Underwater Cities - Board Game Review

Рет қаралды 5,178

Күн бұрын

Pulsar 2849 was the biggest surprise for me from last year. A bone dry point salad from an unknown designer that I ended up loving. Can this designer make lightning strike twice and produce another solid hit for me?
0:20 - Intro & Overview
03:45 - Duration
07:06 - Ease of Play
10:16 - Tactics/Strategy
14:44 - Aesthetics
18:19 - Immersion
20:33 - Longevity
25:04 - Final Thoughts
What do you think of Underwater Cities and Pulsar 2849, let me know in the comments!
Please check out the other videos on this channel as well as my official blog page.
brokenmeeple.blogspot.co.uk/
And also please check out my podcast at:
/ luke-hector-br. .
Find me on Facebook and Twitter.
Support my Patreon page at:
/ thebrokenmeeple
Also taking Paypal donations direct to:
xperiahector@gmail.com
Trolls will not be tolerated and any comments that aren't discussing the topic or providing useful constructive criticism will be deleted. If I'm feeling nice, you'll get a warning.
Credit to BGG & Scott King for imagery.
Credit to MotionArray for Adobe based templates/music

Пікірлер: 25

@TheClootie 5 жыл бұрын

New shirt, hair combed! Are you going on a date after this??

@TheBrokenMeeple 5 жыл бұрын

Ha ha I recorded this after work! 😂

@rsmu1439 5 жыл бұрын

Fun fact: "suchy" in Polish means "dry", really! And it's funny when the author with a "dry" surname makes another dry game, and what's more, it's located thematically underwater, but it's still dry 😊 By the way, Pulsar got an advanced game of the year award in Poland last weekend.

@scyldscefing3913 5 жыл бұрын

I agree with you on Pulsar. So I'm looking forward to your views on this one.

@Thomas-kx9op 5 жыл бұрын

Great review

@seanmorgan2257 5 жыл бұрын

Was a bit weirded out by the new look at first but awesome review thank you

@steveweshinskey2117 5 жыл бұрын

I like Pulsar 2849, Terraforming Mars and Underwater Cities. I own all 3 and play them all regularly. I find UC to be about half way between TfM and Pulsar in feels anyway.

@alam1000malam 5 жыл бұрын

I've played the game plenty of time. It seems everyone always highlighted about the cards, and forgot that the actions worker space on the board are (the most) important. Yes playing the cards is fun but I've had many situations that the best thing to do is taking the board action and ignore the cards. Think the cards just a bonus you can get and your most important goal is to build your cities, and how you do it mostly rely on those action space on the board. I love the game.

@rikhavok 5 жыл бұрын

I love this game. I feel the theme with every card play. I couldn’t wait for it to come out. My only problem is that it’s a long game. It doesn’t need to be so long but that is easy to mitigate - it’s three acts. Just play 2 or 1 act instead.

@MeepleMentor 5 жыл бұрын

I got to play this game twice now. It's very, very good!

@mbrochh82 5 жыл бұрын

Damn. I wasn't aware that you do such in-depth reviews. The game was on my buy list for a while just because of the hype but your review convinced me to better stay away from it. I'll stick to Pulsar :)

@vincentvanbeelen837 5 жыл бұрын

Try Shipyard! Also a very nice game of his.

@TheBrokenMeeple 5 жыл бұрын

Played it a while ago, didn't latch on to it, a bit too far down the dry camp and the "fall off the map " rule left a sour taste.

@monomundo 5 жыл бұрын

Thank you Luke - watched/listened a lot of reviews on this one - and I finally got how it works. I will probably pass on this one - it looks cool but nothing really exceptional :)

@nosarcasm1 5 жыл бұрын

The Card limitations is only for one Type of card. Your hand is limited to three cards at the beginning of your turn. I don't remember which ones but you not limited to five cards in sum in your player area.

@TheBrokenMeeple 5 жыл бұрын

On further read throughs it's 4 x action cards. But yeah that could have been written better, like I said the rulebook is not perfect. Further research reveals I'm not the only one to make that error. Doesn't change my feelings though, still like the game and frankly if anything that probably makes resource production even worse. You already get so much stuff that it no longer feels tight, this revelation will make it even less.

@elijahfuller9693 5 жыл бұрын

I have to admit I was tempted to get Underwater Cities but the time per player really puts it against other games we have that I really like amongst our collections, so it would get played less. I also wasn't in love with Terraforming Mars, I didn't hate it but it felt very slow and I was always broke throughout the entire game each time we played. After three plays and when the time would come for our group to make game suggestions, the words Terraforming Mars never seem to leave our lips. Speaking of heavy Mars games, are you backing On Mars? I backed it but I'm a little nervous on how heavy it is, my group hasn't yet played a Vital Lacerda game. Our heaviest games are probably Founders of Gloomhaven, Brass Birmingham, Argent the Consortium and Rising Sun. Do you have any suggestions for teaching heavier games and assisting in the first game be more enjoyable?

@redeyedghost1406 5 жыл бұрын

If your group can play Brass Birmingham and Founders of Gloomhaven successfully, you should be fine with a Lacerda game. Definitely check out a play through or two though.

@i4m3rr0r 5 жыл бұрын

Well it's not about whether your group will be able to play on mars (of course they can) but rather if they enjoy that complexity. I think experience is a bit overrated when it comes to boardgames, sure it helps, but it is not required and it is a lot more important that everyone in your group wants to learn it. But even if your group doesn't like On Mars, you should be able to sell it without a big loss.

@plush99999 Жыл бұрын

How is the expansion?

@TheBrokenMeeple Жыл бұрын

Worth getting if only for the player powers, extra cards and fixing those player boards by giving you dual layer ones.

@plush99999 Жыл бұрын

@@TheBrokenMeeple Thanks! It's expensive, but sounds like its worth it if you enjoy the game.

@CoyoteStarrk88 5 жыл бұрын

I feel 30 minutes for one game is too long even with useful timestamps (thanks for that). I'd rather watch a tight 10-15 minutes review at max next time. Or pick up similar games and make a comparative review.

@TheBrokenMeeple 5 жыл бұрын

Some complex gamesneed more time. When I see people take 5-10 minutes to talk about a giant game I feel like they don't give enough info. However that's why I include the time stamps now, after all why would you need a stamp for a ten minute video?

@CoyoteStarrk88 5 жыл бұрын

I think if a video is long you lose potential viewers. Being exhaustive can be good and I definitely appreciate your effort. However, I'd only watch a 30 mins game review about games that I'm interested in the highest level while probably watch shorter videos about lesser known ones.