Your engine is great but you seriously shoukf consider improving the way materials are handled when we import 3d models. No one wants to have to re add the materials to a very large 3d model of an entire city. Please improve your model import so its like LUMION. All 3d models should import into your engine with the materials ALREADY ADDED. Its a huge pain having to re texture ur models.. Especially for very large models with thousands of parts.

Thats a very light mode comment.

It's only the "community" license that does not allow oil, energy and defense industry. The commercial licenses DO allow those industries. At first glance this seems strange - if you are in the oil or defense industry and have a revenue below 100k you are doing something wrong... From personal experience I know that there are billion dollar corporations out there that outsource some R&D to subsidiaries that operate on a shoestring budget. So technically the subsidiary could develop some cutting edge visualization/simulation for the big company using the free community license as they never make any revenue... From that point of view I clearly see why they exclude certain industries from the community license.

At this point epic needs to be slapped down, they aren't user friendly, heck they pretty much hate gamers, and only like developers. Like WHAT! They need people to buy those games. No one to buy, no cash comming in.

@@tripwire76 , that makes sense. Thanks for the insight.

@@SqualidsargeStudios Unreal engine is mainly a developers tool company. Its natural for them to cater to developers. Thankfully you can buy games from multiple stores so it doesnt matter and its up to to the developers to cater to their customers.

If they made large worlds available it would be very hard for me to justify staying with Unreal. The only reason left would be the access to Megascans you get.

I'll wait for 64-bit coordinates. In the meantime, I'm moving from Amazon Lumberyard to Unreal Engine to see if I can learn how to do what this guy did: forums.unrealengine.com/community/work-in-progress/1432368-real-size-procedural-universe

What are the workflow differences between this and unreal/unity ?

@@YYYValentine it's more intuitive., in my opinion. it is hard to explain. you would have to work with it to see what i am talking about. one thing is for sure, the lighting is far, far superior to Unreal and Unity right out of the box. and that is before any post processing. it is just really nice, hands down. again, try it for yourself, and see.

I wanted to love Godot when it comes to 3D but I find it somewhat lacking.

@@firesoul453 Yea, it is. And to me that's unfortunate, because I can't use these engines on my potato... UE doesn't even run, for that matter. Unity runs "mostly ok", but VS takes a toll on my 2gb ram, and I hate MonoDevelop. Well I hate C# anyway so...

@@skaruts Buy another 2 Gb - all programs will run MUCH smoother.

@@skaruts how do you use monodevelop now? They deprecated it two years ago.

@@vaishnav_mallya No idea. Either it could still be used anyway up to a point after deprecation, or I haven't used unity in longer than that. :)

@BrokenAngel67 Well... I'm not an artist, I'm a software engineer. Using the graphs seems very tedious to me, but I'm considering it anyway, C++ is the most feature rich, and complicated, programming language in the world. I am good at it, but I've gotten used to the easy life of C#.

There is a high-detailed ObjectLandscapeTerrain system in all three editions, together with the editor.

@@UNIGINE_Official Yes, but we were about to create a rally sim which would greatly utilized the ability to generate the terrain based on the real world data. But I understand we can't have everything in the free version, will have to look elsewhere.

Why? you was't forced to use it in other engine?

Maybe you mean "no Visual Scripting ONLY engine - I'm in!"

And no mobile support?

@@ForeverNils If you don't see it - probably it hasn't one :-)

True

I think that there physics and big open world with double precision + VR are going to be very good. Now is it any good atm? No. Double float is not there. VR yea. And physics I'm not sure is open enough to work with. I mean for a game like Kerbal space program or off road game like Spin tires or anything of the sort is going to be a perfect fit. I mean there is allot of nice stuff here. Heck Sim games in general is going to fit very well in this engine. If your not ready to write everything to fit your spin tires game. Well? This engine looks like a good starting point. Given time this engine might make games made in Unity/Unreal instead be made in this better suited vehicle/combat engine. But always online requirement to use the engine is a no go for me right now. And without double precision Unreal is still on top and that is a shame.

Just to clarify. This physics are military grade. Everything is more or less military grade. Wanky physics are a real pain with all game engines. That alone is a big + for this engine. There is no chance that this physics engine they have made is NOT stable and reliable. I'm sure there clients do not find it funny having stuff go wanky and fly out into space when trying to simulate something realistically like connecting a trailer to your SUV or Tank. Whatever.

facts

You mean Source 1.2 ? Well if your into making VR yea. But Valve pretty much can sod off. They do not care about making games. So there tools and IP's we can just forget.

They are not planing to make mobile, it's not in their priorite

@@jeckster25 I mean? I sure want to run my IOS game at 1fps. No shit that are not their priories. XD

Look at this kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nq6TiLyCutKrYGQ.html Show case of their C# component system. It looks very similar to Unity

Yeah thats the one.

Having tried it today, it feels way more like Cryengine (cleaner UI, though) than Unity. I like using it, though.

@@perregrinne2500 hmm never tried cryengine myself. i just hope it has alot of tools for making games which unity really weirdly lacks...

Haha, yea i feel ya. Only thing is, Unity community is second to none.

Don't call it a "dark mode". It is called a modern adequate design. Unity has a design of 20 years old Excel spreadsheet

@@brutal6129 good comment :))

I get a MUCH stronger Xenko vibe personally.

@@gamefromscratch I also get CryEngine vibe

With always network requirement. High end PC's. And no community or double precision. No good way to learn or look under the hood as much is not open source. And it is a de lite to choose server to connect to when logging in. China / Others. Feels safe.

@@gamefromscratch can i use this the same as blender for youtube videos without getting in trouble

you can use it for non comercial and comercial under 100k is that hard to understand?

@@again8550 That's now what it says at 8:40.. It explicitly says eligible for: Non-commercial projects. I believe there is some ambiguity / confusion with the website info.

@@ccgb92 No ambiguity. you can use it for non comercial and comercial under 100k is that hard to understand? Its one thing to misunderstanding it for the first time. Understandable. But you keep repeating it on and on even when people are explaining it to you. stop spreading your misunderstanding everywhere. Read the whole context for fuck sake Free Community edition eligible for: - Non-commercial projects. - Academic use - Revenue or funding less than $100K in the last 12 months Not eligible for some industries: - Energy - Defense-related projects - Mining, Oil & Gas industries - Gambling And in the paid community pro edition, its eligible(must be upgraded from free edition) for: - revenue or funding is greater than $100K in the last 12 months If that still means commercial purpose cant use it, you better go check your brain

@@blazkify You sound raged for no reason, it's definitely ambiguous wording. Calm down.

@@ccgb92 Its ambigous if you just read without thinking. when I explain it on and on again for the fourth time and you refuse to understand(and even keep spreading misinformation), it hard not to rage

Well if youre a gamedev you already have at least 32...

Yeah you're right , 32 Ram DDR 4 , 16 core amd cpu , RTX 2060 super, nvme 1 To

It needs a good decent machine to run. Not much tutorials yet. Cryengine is still best if you don't want to code, then you can do flowgraph. If you want to code, then C++, or a bit of c#.

Visual scripting is hell and I'm sick of it. I wish it wasn't a thing. These "game developers" who have a fear of programming piss me off, tbh.

@@yourzombiemop8259 SHUT UP - and get off my comment thread since you don't like it. Go make your own comment thread and complain over there.

@@vlweb3d Lol ok You're a hella angry person Guess I struck a chord Have a good life 👋

Unigine is perfect for large scale games, like space simulations. You can make our solar system with millimeter positioning precision, which is freaking awesome. Otherwise ue4 is the BEST engine ever, imho. I think Unigine it's the only engine that supports double precisions.

Firnekburg I get that the paid versions are great at simulation stuff. But that's hardly what one wants with a game engine. And not even provided with the free version. Heck, like 90% of my projects would be impossible without runtime data export and import. Doesn't even seem like you could work with projects that takes advantage of Cuda or OpenCl.

I gave it a try just this morning for the first time, so my understanding of this engine is a bit limited. From what I have used so far, the engine ships with various things to cut down the workload (haven't explored everything though). It has a handful of commonly-used premade materials for example, and they all are very realistic. The main draws to 3D-specialized engines such as Unigine, Unreal, and Cryengine are that the engines come with plenty of things that are very common in the 3D games you might want to make. Many of them ship with either templates or classes (or both) for 3rd-person or 1st-person character games, vehicle classes, AI perception classes or prebuilt AI sequences, water (materials, caustics, post-process), etc. , which are things I have found that Unity and Godot don't come with, forcing you to create them for each 3D game that you make. I will definitely need more time to figure out using this engine, but from what I've seen so far, it has great potential to cut down a decent chunk of workload in a realistic 3D game. I do look forward to using it more later on.

Perregrinne Ah, ok. That does seem interesting.

@@firnekburg4990 It only supports doubles in the Engineering and Simulation versions of the engine, the Community and Pro versions are just 32-bit floats. I was bummed about that too, but still like the engine, from what I've used of it so far.

The new landscape system is fully available for the free version, including tools. The paid version has a specific implementation for GIS.

You've got cryengine or unreal

The same thing happened when I installed it but appeared several hours later. It's a matter of time to download.

you can

1:00 non-commercial was next to eligibility so they was referring it as people who do not plan on making money with their games can still use their engine for free.

I see... I was lost. Thanks guys

Godot is better lighter try that bro

Godot 3 is VERY light!

As others have stated, go with Godot. That thing will fly even on Pentium and 128K RAM :)

Ok,thanks everyone,can you give me some tutorials or sth like that?

@@ticubogdan4236 There are a few on KZfaq. That one is not bad: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rauEjJiQntGqpHU.html

Don't pay anything, use the completely free UNIGINE version for any VR application you want. We're not charging anybody unless the project hits the revenue of $100 000 per year

^

yes, Unbelievable

It doesn't have mobile support (but I may be mistaken).

This is engine focuses on high performance and realistic graphics so mobiles are out of question.

No, wording is just poor. Under $100K earned OR used for non-commercial project.

@@gamefromscratch Yes, $100K earned BY YEAR.

I wish Unreal offered c#

@@firesoul453 - Well, perfect time to learn it or just use Unreal's Blueprints.

C++ is ok. I'm just much more productive in c#. Blueprints get hard to manage when doing more complex stuff. There are so many game engines out there but none hit everything I want in a game engine/workflow.

@@firesoul453 yeah I understand. C++ is very tough to pick up. I'm sometimes having hard time with C# too. But performance wise, C++ is more performant.

@Pataxu - giving 5% of earnings sounds better. subscription based platforms are not future proof and since UE4 is very far in terms of features, it sounds very reasonable. uniengine seems like godot with a price tag.

It would be very sad if no new engine could ever be a hit.

@@bexplosion True. Hope it works out for those using it.

@@surfacedfox I was referring to the video where he said they missed the boat on how it's become the norm for game engines to open their software to everyone. Rather than sticking to the paywall barrier to entry elitist crap. But then, it is from Russia. This is what I found on their Wiki: "Unigine is a proprietary cross-platform game engine, developed by Russian software company Unigine Corp. Apart from its use as a game engine, it is mainly used in enterprise area: simulators, virtual reality systems, serious games and visualization." Not sure who wrote it, but what are "Serious games" anyway? They have a list of their 'serious games'.. lmao... on that page. I've never heard of a single one and it's been around for 15 years apparently. I think the only software I have used was Super Position and Haven benchmarks. I hope it does well in the "real gaming" market that they are trying to get into... Call me pessimistic but I've learned to expect patterns with companies. If they just now came around to the idea then what else are they hiding behind a paywall? I'm assuming it's something like Terragen. Where it's used in blockbuster movies, and you can use the software. But trying to learn the software requires a paywall and contacts with people in the company who keep their methods to themselves. In other words, if you get hired by the company you get to learn their proprietary software. I could be wrong. But that's what it smells like at this moment.

You can if your funding/sales is under $100k or you buy a paid license.

@@firesoul453 it is said that NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMMERCIAL PROJECTS. It didn't specify that it is available for commercial use unless you make 100K/ year. That's it. Learn to read.

@@brutal6129 Firstly, you're only talking about FREE pricing. Secondly, there's no mention its not available for commercial project. Go read through the FREE pricing again. That's it. Learn to read PROPERLY. And think about it let me make it easy for you. Not eligible for some industries: Defense Gambling Energy Mining, Oil & Gas No mention its not available for commercial project. Eligible for: Non-commercial projects Academic use (education only) Revenue or funding less than $100K in the last 12 months "eligible for non-commerical projects" =/= "not eligible for commercial projects".

@@blazkify Free version says it's only eligible for non-commercial projects.

@@ccgb92 Their website is unclear - you have to read the EULA to get the full picture. According to their EULA, to be eligible for Unigine Community (free version) you must meet one of (as in one or the other, not both) the following requirements: You earned less than $100k in the past 12 months, OR the final product you develop with the engine is for non-commercial use only (education, science, charity, etc.).