i can help (yo puedo ayudar)

Me too

I would be elated to do voicework.

It needs no commentary. The absence of commentary makes it visually transfixing. We do not need to have the wonder verbally pointed out to us. We do not need our attention or our thoughts directed. Leave it as it is. Let the viewer's own wonder and imagination take them over.

Couldn't agree more with last reply from banned from commenting; can only... the ambient music also goes with the video with no commentary

The force is strong with you o,b,1

Actually, not as strange as the one they want us to believe. Checkout Sumer.

You deserve 1k likes.

Aliens dude.. freaking aliens!!

Much more like Lord of the rings.

Yes it is kind of refreshing. And now here comes the commentary : anyone who thinks that anyone else could cut those curved sections out of solid rock with Machine Tools, (even today!) has got to have rocks in their head

@@grantperkins368 ⁰⁰p¹p 1⁰⁰

It's not about conspiracy theory, is more like, rejecting any hypothesis by the (oficcially established )historyans, I mean any theory that takes them out of their comfort zone .

It makes my mind race just to see them. It must have been something to live in those times.

The scientific community are here to control the information!!!

Yes you are absolutely right. Most of these carvings don't make sense. What the hack happened and why?

I've been thinking maybe it's the areas where they experimented on their techniques. Kind of a "school/lab" forum to work in to develop and refine their methods.

@@rasputinsliver9092 Either that or they were laughing hysterically while they made things they knew would have us trying to make sense of it.

Indeed, it must have been very easy to do..

@@ThomiX0.0 I've often thought however they carved the stones, for whatever reason it must have been relatively easy for them.

Then, it is more accurate to suggest - the 'primitive tools of early man' theory is totally without accuracy or reason. What happened to these real tools then? They were used, used & recycled constantly until societal changes or catastrophe changed the direction of things.

There is NO rock as hard as a diamond.

Today's scientists also tell us that we are responsible for the warming of the atmosphere.

@@tonyheaden9263 But there are rocks like this that would REQUIRE diamond tip tools.

It looks like they cut through it with a hot butter knife.

@Oftin Wong Hard work and persistence is vital when working stone. But what do you use to cut and shape Basalt when the hardest material (assumed) to have existed at that time was copper? Maybe there was some technology or process that has been lost to us through the centuries. After all, people don't do this kind of work on any sizeable scale today, even with current technology. Also, when the stones are cut for these, often miles away, how did they move them up the mountains and hills where they are now? There is something we are missing about all this. I don't go straight to the alien extreme, but they knew something that we don't and I find that pretty compelling.

Here

@Oftin Wong lmfao, the point is you can't cut granite with a fuckin copper or bronze tool. Modern technology cant replicate some of this. So, it doesnt matter how hard you work, how many times you hit these granite stones with a bronze chisel , you ain't gonna form it. Hit it a million times nothing happens.

@Oftin Wong lmfao who said aliens?? Beonze tools is what mainstream says. You can't carve granite with bronze tools.

@George Browning Definitely.

@George Browning my point exactly, this explains the distance of moving things

not carved, CAST, with geopolymer concrete

@@aaaexcavatorsvietnam1128 A lot of it is granite and other natural stone.

Can it be concrete?

@@christianvoss8614 seems there was some type of concrete used in different cultures in the past. 👍 Possibly some mixtures unknown to people today that were like a liquid epoxy that when hardened becomes similar to granite or marble.🤔 At least you have asked the question allowing for the possibility to gain knowledge of something perceived by many as impossible🙏

Hiram abiff

@@christianvoss8614 yes that as well. See hidden formula for marble statues and building facades . Cameron on autodidactic talks about the mudflood and exoteric occulted tech I've discovered relics on a golf course with a mound and unusual similar stone in the surrounding upper levels of the range seems this was a structure from long ago or we are a people with amnesia¿

@@christianvoss8614 Language Watch Edit Roman concrete, also called opus caementicium, was a material used in construction in Ancient Rome. Roman concrete was based on a hydraulic-setting cement. It is durable due to its incorporation of pozzolanic ash, which prevents cracks from spreading. By the middle of the 1st century, the material was used frequently, often brick-faced, although variations in aggregate allowed different arrangements of materials. Further innovative developments in the material, called the concrete revolution, contributed to structurally complicated forms, such as the Pantheon dome, the world's largest and oldest unreinforced concrete dome.[1]

Well spotted young lady.... keep on the path.

Ditto, let's figure this out

@Kate worth, concrete will not do..an large surface's as the weight is to much to stay in shape. It must have been a 'surface- plasticity' in order to scrape or flatten the stone.. The repairs in the cracks must have been heated to make this toolmarks we see as leftover from it. But how? :-)

@George Browning I have worked much concrete as well. It’s very obvious that geopolymer has been utilized all over earth and sold as ancient high tech to the imbeciles.

@ geopolymer has been debunked many times. If you pour a mixture with small pebbles in the mix. They will pushed in meeting the mould. The strange thing is the pebbles mostly harder are cut right off with the surface. So it was not poured but natural formations and machined like we do now.

c. all of the above

And what destroyed it all?...

I guess time distroys everything in the end. And the earthquakes that came with it.

@@Simonsiempie I feel the same. What destroyed it all was massive amounts of water that came down from the sky. Massive earthquakes, and volatile volcanos like that of Pompeii.. impacts from meteor showers like those that destroyed the dinosaur's. And perhaps even a collision with another body of land from space that neared earth and smashed into it. Causing a pole shift. Along with sudden flash freezing of animals while they grazed off of vegetation. Like the wooly mammoth.

@@Simonsiempie the younger dryas cataclysm

hope I'm reaching you C , first ever replying to a comment . Thinking of Great Pyrimid of Giza and perhaps the Trilithon of Baalbek and it's accompanyying quarry we can atleast discuss limestone . number one there are a great many variations of grain , density , and meta-morphic compressive strengths . You can find a great deal of 19th century building facades made from a super even , fine- grained " brownstone" which is a true sedimentary stone where upon close inspection you can see the tiny exoskeletal remnants , piesces and even whole bodies but then come the limes that have become metamorphic ! you will see the seeming evidence of crystallization , still in evidence the less occasional shape of a somewhat larger variety of ancient lifeforms ... The "bluestone " chips used widely in concrete quarried and crushed expressly for that purpose are of that metamorphosed type , this stuff is practically speaking almost as dense as granite in say a two inch chip format and banged around with a hammer , will split and or granulate similarily . That said and in wondering as to the large-scale operation it would take to either render quarried stone to the dusts and powders and sands and stones necessary to form a slurryable admix equally boggles my imagination . pyroclastic techniques also come into question as regards the use of igneous materials . l am also a carver of stone and certain stone "bruises" namely marbles( another type of metamorphosed limeestone) if a chisel is held and struck too acutely it will micro-shatter the internal matrix and leave a web of weakness that though undetectable at first might only be in evidence after polishing and certainly upon invested age if left to the scour and penetration of water ....pocks and spalls will develop .. l note this because not all of the suspect voids i see ( as yet only through photos) seem aparent to bruising . but so much of it IS apparently the appearance of not only formed but the very occasional voids left where matter was not vibrated well enough or viscosity wasnt present enough to settle completely before it hardened. concrete is in its final product is a man-made conglomerate , even cement which is all-else but the stone , or grouts ( sanded or unsanded ) still in essence a conglomerate. The Romans knew to create concrete with the widest array of agregate , from sand to even small boulders , all heavily tamped into place to remove air. as a kid locked up in the Commonwealth of Kentucky i was essentially handed a trowel and told to get busy , in the meager library at my last facility i found an interesting late 50s book on Masonry and in it was an absolutely astounding photo of two portside concrete jobs on the coast of Italy . one badly eroded bulwark for end of wharf done by Mussolini's army engineers , the other a 2nd century Roman edifice replete with balustrades and rail still in excellent condition . ill never forget that image. much to say but must get to work. anytime i can add-to , aid or abet ...

Your mason history does not apply to this ! Just so you know

They weren't processing " Stone".... it was much softer then. The were carving the Deposits left behind from the flood of the Bible !

@@ggzz6862Really? Do, tell me, how do you know it was much softer then?

D​@@emanjam45『EDEN MEDIA』の『この世界の石は生きていた』を視聴して下さい。

@@emanjam45 It's called the flood of the bible . There are countless indicators as to how deep the deposits left behind were all over the world !....It also lines up perfectly with Occam's Razor

@@ggzz6862 there are three types of stones ..... Metamorphic igneous and sedimentary. Every stone that was left over by the flood would come under the category of sedimentary that has nothing to do with the types of stones we are talking about.... what you need to do is go back to the first grade and start over again because you do not have an education

Yes it is very frustrating to see what we cannot explain, the marks on that Jaguar bowl look just like the rock was dissolved or vapourised. There are impressions in the surface that look like a hot bar was pressed into it but that is physically impossible to do for a number of reasons. First we don't have any metals that can take that much heat without melting and second when rock is heated to melting it's molecular structure changes so when it cools it becomes very brittle and does not return to it's previous state. The general carving out of the granite sculpture was done with regular stone tools by chipping it away bit by bit but the fine detail around the face and claws was done using an entirely different and unknown method and it looks as though the person making the carving was doing it for the first time and learning the technique. Some areas appear to have had some king of thick liquid dripped on it which ate away at the stone but what we know about granite makes this explanation impossible, the more you look at it the more you see ! I don't like the alien theory because that's too simple and impossible to prove, I believe the people who did this developed the technique through trial and error and meditation under psychoactive substance trance, it has been shown that many unexpected things have been learned using these techniques and the human mind is capable of much more than we realise. At one time this was the normal way to gain information and learning but in modern times it is frowned upon as 'Devil Worship' and 'witchcraft'. The only way to retrieve these technologies would be to use the same psychoactive substances and trances that the ancient people knew about and learned from.

To add more mystery, in ancient Peru only bronze, plate and gold were worked, but that kind of tools cannot carve the rocks like shown in the video ... i just can't imagine how they moved the giant blocks without the use of the wheel

I laugh when I hear someone say the ancients used copper tools to cut marble and granite.

@@calculator1841 I agree. Assertions like that are short sighted at best. Its a testament to the level of cognative content our so called experts are working with. They are all suffering from the Dunning Kruger effect.

It blows my mind to try to work out what kind of techniques would produce these results ! The rock looks like it was very soft when it was worked and in some places it looks like it was molten and then re-solidified but rock does not melt and re-solidify like metal because it has a crystalline structure. If you heat rock to melting point then let it cool it crumbles and breaks apart, yet there are signs all over those rocks that something was pressed against them while they were in a soft state ! Freeze the video @13:34, take a screenshot and zoom right in to see impossible results in solid granite !

They were highly advanced when it came to flowing water. I wouldn't be suprised if they ancient hydrolic tools and machines. Some of the marks around some sites with the largest of stones look as though the stone was pressure washed away. All you need to do is look at how address rocks are carved and look at what a water jet(water and sand) can do and then use your imagination. I mean people make water powered hydrolic tattoo machines in jail/prison powered by a sink which requires you to constantly have 1 person pushing a button and other materials most would regard as trash. Also I'm sure giant squids and etc. were much more prevalent. Giant squids have claws and beaks that can gouge lines out of steel ship hulls and are about as hard as diamond. These organic materials would be perfect for making tools where diamonds couldn't be had.

Try a parabolic mirror on dyorite melts it instantly . 3,6,9... All is frequency, resonence, osculation. Let's consider radiant energy and liquid batteries?

@@virtualmoyda7221 see VICTOR SHAUBERGER, MAKES EDISON LOOK LIKE A PUPPY. ALSO SEE HUTCHINSON EFFECT ITS THE 9.11 ON MELTING ANYTHING OR LEVITATING IT THIS IS '*"OLD HAT TECH MYSTERY SCHOOL OR IVY LEAGUE

@@hokeypokey1109 I'm highly familiar with the Hutchinson effect. The rocks that have Hutchinson style fissures looks more like part of the remnants of what destroyed the original structures more so than how they were made in my opinion. As in a massive solar flare or mass coronal ejection that triggered all sorts of electro magnetic anomalies struck the area as well as blowing mass amounts of debris into the planet which also triggered the rapid melting of ice and caused mass amounts of global flooding. Some sort of freak event or weapon went off judging by puma punku and the other megalithic sites in South America. The patterns and nuclear glass found around other megalithic sites also tends to point in this direction as well as the flash frozen mammoth graves.

Tom Jeffries. Unbelievable naieve fantasies about malleable stone. All the stone was cut. It is as simple as that.

Like I mentioned in another comment, looks very "clay" like as though after a deluvial flood and sedimentary rock is laid down, would it take time to harden?

No, they look pounded not melted. I too have seen them. If they had advanced tech, where is it? Why is nothing else advanced? Why did they fight wars with stone axes? People have been working stone in Peru for 3000 years, at least. By 500 years ago, they were really good at it.

@@honeysucklecat Questions are not, in and of themselves, answers or solutions. It's difficult to say what an ancient people may or may not have had. While there are many questions, I doubt we will have any definitive answers. I'm not one of those people who thinks that alien civilizations gave hidden technology to people centuries/millenia ago. But I do know that if you pound on a rock face, it's likely to look quite different from what we see. But I'm also not a geologist, just some person on the internet. 🙃

Obsidian , dude used it to copy ancient Egyptian carvings . Was easy for him.

Read the comments, @mark lewis said FRESNEL LENS @12:48. Look it up.

Modern humans invented 500 genders. There is no way beings smart enough to perform task we incellectuals can't replicate today ever existed. Now stop thinking and be dumb you are out of line.

@@trashpanda7859 Bro I have no what idea wht u tryna say

I agree totally.. i think its a bit crazy to think man kind is the only intelligent beings to be here within the last idk 100% of time like everybody we known and studied is less than 5% of earths history imagine that

@@4TroneOfficial @TrashPanda is pointing out that those in power wish us to be dumb and follow everything they say and that we shouldn’t question their knowledge

Yep I totally agree….as it’s been stated by others before that the ancient civilisations were very advanced but in ways us humans can’t fathom….as we need science, sense and proof that unfathomable things can exist. What we don’t understand, we will fear! And with fear we cause death

Make ya wonder if they had some kind of light saber or something similar?some pretty amazing cutting tools that’s for sure! Definitely some technology that we’re not yet understanding?obviously we don’t have that technology today,definitely something that we are missing here?

@@raymondomit6257 Look at the elongated skulls & hybrids. We are missing the alien connections.

I see the same: a flat 3mm blade, a curved blade, and rods. Assuming they had the tools, I can't imagine how these were adjustable tools of varying size and why there isn't slag everywhere.

but some lines on the puma claws are very straight, but at the same time also looks like melted. it looks like they used the tool for cutting the stone, to carve the litlle puma. was the stone melting like styrofoam?

I agree, I've thought about that as well. I have a theory --- I think some of these sites were classrooms -- students being taught how to use the ancient tools and perfect the techniques. That's why I think you see some of those obvious little protrusions on some of the stones in walls, but not others. They stuck some kind of melting device into the stone, made the stone like a bread of dough, but the timing had to be just right to pull the device back out again and the younger more inexperienced workers were left with the pull out marks. Other stones you see some square indentations -- this is because the stone was sagging -- maybe because the devise was withdrawn too fast and they pushed the stone back up into place with pieces of wood. Just a theory

Really good point, actually

Hey kids, check this shit out! Have a fun new toy. Go bananas!

I watched a video that claims it was like cement.. But some of these.l I don't think so

that looks like soft rock it can easily can be carved with axe or chisel i have seen the same stone work in midas city turkey which was worked on soft rock .the real mystery is the granite in egypt

@@sbk162 For sure, I have done a lot of research on Egypt. That's my favorite place on earth

@@Mike-mp8ce why would it be a mystery as they had all the slave labor as a workforce and were rulers with proven high skilled engineers

@@onnietalone3181 I don't believe it was slave labor.

I just saw it too. Maybe YT let it up out of the noise because it was trending.

The commentary is 'how was this created' ? We have no explanations for any of these cuts, shapes or holes, all we have is speculation and guesswork.

Lol

👍

I'm right there with you~!!! Maybe God sent down the rock cutting Angels.

​@@RickaramaTrama-lc1ys I really do believe it is ego. I think people couldn't handle the idea that older civilizations were more advanced and that we're deteriorating, not just morally but technologically. So much for evolution, which runs contrary to the idea that we're farther from perfection than when we started.

Greetings from beautiful Esquimalt, BC Canada! At 77 and a 65 yrs student of history, I concur with everything you've written, so I won't repeat any of it, except to say that your reasoning is 100% sound. Many people, when they cannot come up with an explanation, would rather stand back and say almost anything, except that they don't know and must wait for an explanation. What's worse, some of them makeup incredible fictions & fables, as if make-believe is a basis for belief and action!

Highly compelling

@Nick Sothep I can't say for sure how they did it but as someone with over 20 yrs experience in concrete and stone masonry, I see extreme similarities between this stone and what concrete looks like when it is tooled and formed as it is drying. They showed examples of what looked like puddles of hardened stone, perfect joints in the blocks, and stone slag with apparent ruptured gas bubbles, similar to volcanic rock. So as I said, I do not know for certain how they accomplished these wonders of construction but if I had to make an educated guess, I would have to say that in every example shown, it appears that they somehow knew how to heat up the rock or somehow turn it into a malleable consistency to shape and lay it while building.

@@digitalninja85 truth

Thank you for a rational, eloquent and heartfelt plea to an increasingly deaf world

And becoming dumber after this experience !

@@etherospike3936 speak for yourself

@@clarencehawkins9503 the parallel wasn't the most appropriate as if television can enlighten someone...And yes when I wach tv I feel a bit stupider , because I know they are speaking crap- especially CNN -therfore TV would not be of use for any medieval man, I would recommend him to read some books !

@@etherospike3936 I understand

Lol

@Oftin Wong Too bad for Inca empire, they were really underdeveloped. However, my thoughts are about the first ones who built those megalithic marvels.

@Oftin Wong I'm not proving anything, just observing facts. And since you mentioned it, I'm considering geopolymer concrete theory as well. What I'm certain, those were not Incas.

@Oftin Wong So, man made rock is not a choice either. Interesting. Are you suggesting that the megaliths were carved by Incas with some primitive bronze/copper tools? Letting alone perfect drill holes and traces everywhere of "molten" rocks.

@Oftin Wong I don't say they were stupid and incapable, just pointed out their level of development acknowledged by mainstream archaeology. And why do you put into the same basket hand made axe heads and anomalies like perfectly drilled holes, circular saw marks, molten stone, and much more... Let alone the sheer size of these blocks. You don't have answers. Take some time to see the difference what Incas really built and what they found when first came there.

@Oftin Wong Molten rock is the way to describe how it looks now, all the rest is just your fantasy. Anyway, your point is quite clear, the megaliths of hard stone were carved and polished by primitive societies (including "molten" rock, circular saw, and core drill anomalies randomly applied everywhere), they've just spent enough time to wear down those rocks with no clear reason why would they waste themselves on such difficult projects. And with these claims you feel reconciled? Obviously, you don't really comprehend the amount of work required to wear down a granite or basalt megalith and apply above mentioned anomalies. I'm not ready to tell who exactly built those sites and which techniques they used (although the timing of at least 12000 year ago seems more and more plausible with new discoveries popping up here and there), but I'll not accept barren claims of mainstream archaeology that go against the common sense.

Yes he is awesome! And Roger Spurr from Mudfossil University does a great job too.

Hey man, just wondering if you can point me to a timestamp of one of these testing rocks. I don't have an artists eye, but I'm curious if we can narrow down our speculation on what form these tools took. Thanks

@@askmeaboutfreewill5791 I’m not so sure I see the artistry either but the idea they were testing their tools at some of these locations bring a whole new to why so many of these seem random with no purpose; like why carve into the side of a mountain or giant stones with no intended purpose?

Been a l o n g time since, appen the waste is now as tangible as the wind.

NO. I think it was a simple process like cement and sand and water, but still we can't figure out what it was... because most of those ancient 'primitive' people could do that almost everywhere...

Philip Kraker We need a time machine

You don't understand what you say . You don't understand who did this and you wouldn't sit at their feet either . You see their offspring today and you call them derogatory names so you'd donthe same with the originators !

These are some of Earth's greatest creations.... it would be awe inspiring just to see them do their work.

The human mind; it 😂would explain how near Nazca they've found so many skulls that were operated on in areas we would not attempt today. Yet the skulls show these individuals survived years afterward. I believe they were being mind manipulated to a higher consciousn🎉ess of being and able to melt and move these up to 3,000 ton stones with their minds with the aid of giants. Human shamans on ayahuasca and giants. There are oral tradition legends of such pairings. People say, "How can it be oral tradition when the people that did it are no more, gone"?,like the Maya. But some remnant skeleton crew, like the Maya, chose to stay and passed on legends to other tribes, and them, to still later generations so on and so on.The majority whisked off world like the Maya. The tribes no longer exist but some few oral scanty, random stories remain and the Megalithic structures themselves stand testament to these ancient builders. It is no accident these sites exist on earth's highest mtn. ranges like here and like Gobekli Tepe. Thanks ❤️ Mario SirSirReal Villarreal AKA Marman ❤️ Thanks ❤

Just cement

that was done , glassing is result of quartz enrichment deposition onto limestone

Thank you Francois

You are right! It's a similar technology for cutting stone. I following Praveen Mohan...very interesting India, too...you have a lot of archaeological treasures there! Greetings from Romania!

sEARCH...

Look at us; we still cannot explain how this was done...

What about a laser beam that functions off a certain level of radiation

I noticed the same things. Something melted those rocks on specific places. Like a soldering iron or something. Lazer maybe?

​@@GrandmaBev64can it be a hot acidic smoke blaster that does this, because a direct laser or plasma causes stone fragmentation which is not what they would use. Unless there's a plasma that we don't know about that doesn't Involve heat at all.

"eleusian mysteries" look it up. The place they used to go to inside their minds is where all knowledge comes from