Kekekek gotteeeeem

so real

Alan wake chapter was hot garbage 😭

Ligma balls.

Alan wake me up inside

omg this is so frickin true

U nailed it.

The people that play DBD are furries and just weird people. No one with good taste in games would play this game.

That's so on point it's not even funny

Holy shit I'll steal this. It's so true!! I am personally a casual gamer (tm) so I'm rarely the asshole (I think) but man o man have other people in that game done shit to me. After playing since 2017 I grew thick skin. Not much gets me to have a real reaction any more - but sometimes some people still manage.

Dbd is too perfectly balanced for even you to touch.

a perfectly balanced comment. im in awe

Omg, Spiff!

This game is to balance. You wont be able to break it 😂😂😂

@@rndThursday A perfectly balanced Reply!

Call Of Duty

Small correction: rule #1 exists in rocket league and it's a by definition perfectly balanced game

to an extent every game has some form of silent social rules, like griefing your team by blocking things, targetting 1 person or just being toxic is BM regardless of which side you're on. But with that said, yeah DBDs balancing issues are really bad lmao

Magic the Gathering's Commander format:

​@@crack4184cod community has absolutely no rules except in sniper 1v1s

lmaooo. id rather work in the mines than trying to play DBD for any length of time. fun for a bit, but wears you down

@bigmetalfan1 Cringe and go back to working, average discord mod.

@MisterSomeone12271 peace and love brotha, peace and love

@@MisterSomeone12271touch grass 🙏

​@@MisterSomeone12271 Are you okay?

most sensible thing a dbd dev has said

Reminds me of Indie Survival game "The Isle", where the lead dev kept telling people who complained about the game being shoddy to "Just make their own game". Fast forward to now and "Isle clone" has become a niche subgenre that pumps out way more games than the small consumer base can reasonably support

Honestly don't bother. The game has been going in an "objectively" good direction now. It's way more balanced than it used to be. The community still constantly complains and is quite toxic (not everyone but even if they are a minority they're heard all right). To me at least it's become incredibly boring. There's really only one viable playstyle, for both roles.

I played over 200 hours of DBD and when I finally moved to something else I never looked back at it.

"For a week". I think he's just trying to encourage people to spend some time outside of obsessing over this one thing- which actually is good advice.

1000 hour league player 🤝 1000 hour dbd player this game is trash

I've been an onlooker and peanut gallery of the DBD community because I'm so fascinated with their revolving circus of angst, disappointment, boredom, and very rare moments of genuine fun and happiness that seem to fuel the whole thing, combined with the atrocious behavior of the development company in an almost poetically beautiful real life representation of The Entity feeding on emotions. It's fascinating, and entertaining. Kinda like how hating playing No Man's Sky was better than playing NMS when it first released, but stretched out over 8 years with no improvement whatsoever instead of the mud to magnificence story of NMS.

This is so real wtf ahhhahhahahahaa

I quit playing Dead by Daylight due to having the most toxic community and a greedy inept developer. Without licensed content this game would be dead.

Everyone who has 1000 hours in a AAA game hates the game they play, but to feed the addiction they must keep playing. This is how I am with overwatch and siege.

That was such an out of touch comment. Don't think that guy has played a game of DBD in the last 5 years

I want to give him the benefit of the doubt and say that he probably misinterpreted the message, thinking they were saying that killer was getting kinda stale after playing it for so long and not that killer was heavily underpowered

@@DoctorTheo No, he didn't misinterpret, he's done that crap multiple times. The game devs are pretty well known for being either actual morons or a-holes. One dev even snapped at people for them daring to keep asking for a specific accessibility option, only for the rest of the devs reveal said option after the backlash grew massive.

Replies like that are quite irksome. There were replies to questions in a Pokémon magazine I had once. One question asked simply "After catching all of the Pokémon and beating the Elite Four, is there anything else?", and the response they got was "What do you expect? A slap-up meal for two?" Like, what was the writer's problem? These were kids they were responding to

​@@AdiG1to be fair though, that is like the whole point of the games. Like you can't even complete the Pokédex by yourself with just one game

And it appeared like he took it with grace.

@@Depressed_Spider yeah, kinda wish he kept that humility, that "go play a diffrent game" thing was nasty

The real painful part is the implication, that the dev wasn't even playing the game or even aware of what was actually happening to his players. What were the the play testers doing? Was anyone on his team playing the game at all and aware of these issue? How was he so oblivious to such a common issue, that he only changed things once he was personally put on the spot? Watching the video i just get the idea that the developers have no real clue what they are doing

@@bigdumbfatcat2869 Maybe the playtesters were playing the game "normally" hence don't see the degenerate shit being pulled off in real play, which reminds me of a saying in Magic the Gathering: "Just as Richard Garfield (the creator of MtG) intended". And similarly had a famous story where Richard was playing with a "fan" who was gushing about the game while infinitely locking Richard out from playing the game.

Reminds me of when the Anarchy Reigns Devs got whooped publicly on their unbalanced game Link: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/h5h7hsaimKrXpo0.htmlsi=Laam1z-1iETdGksQ

Genji’s rival

Nerf pig. She can move more than 1 MPH. Nerf pig again.

@@Echoe-14 Irelia's rival

We can call that The pig syndrome

yeah same i want idv players who constantly whine about the game being unbalanced to watch this video (although gamekeeper and priestess do desperately need adjustments)

Ahahah yeah idv players don't know what unbalanced looks like

Idv has survivor roles that specialize in actually rescuing survivors. Also tunneling and camping is effectively incentiviced as it is an effective strategy as well but not as effective as it was in DBD. At its core idv is more balanced than DBD ever will. And that's saying something of a gacha Chinese game.

Legit, i could never get into dead by daylight because of this issue and played idv instead. Idv has its issues with balancing but it is in a much better state currently then DBD…

the fact that being camped is something you have to just expect and accept in idv sucks tho. players keep saying it’s a strategy, or that it’s required to win as killer, but that fact doesn’t make the experience more fun. it’s definitely one of the biggest reasons i lost interest in idv. both as a killer and survivor

The community is really what puts me off of this game. Even League doesn't have a community that hates the game so much they actively try to ruin it for others. From in-game to the Subreddit to the forums, everyone who plays this game sucks all around.

The Left 4 Dead 2 Versus community in a nutshell

@@ThorDude it helps that League actually has a decent structure. "assymmetrical" multiplayer game just sounds like a funamentally bad idea

My fav thing was asking how to get into comp lobby's for practicing, and was told you need at least 1000 hours before you can even join. Thats just there rule. they wont even let you PRACTICE with them until you have 1000 hours. Funniest thing is, ive actually got in one because they said "we will show you how high the skill ceiling is" only for them to get 3ked by a killer who had 400 hours, while the had 7000 collectively. The only reason i didn't 4k was because of the hatch. They are legit delusional. None of them were particularly good might a add, not even as a dig, ive legit had more trouble in solo que, it was such a weird experience i just noped out of that scene right away.

@@heavensgate2245 the L4D2 versus community isn't as bad, of course you will get called an idiot and a dumbass for simple mistakes sure but that is roughly tame.

exactly this. all it does is force players to pick a specific killer or insta-lose every match, which just saps the fun out of the game. wanna main X? too bad! the only way to win games is to play our brand new killer!

**Cough loudly** Money.

Nurse is free killer, so they could maybe only sell skins, but still that makes other killers sell less skins if nobody plays them. So lose/lose situation for devs and players.@@ultimaxkom8728

Sounds like identity V

@@ultimaxkom8728The nurse was a free DLC

This is every multiplayer game that is not balanced closely or has pros that help, while I am indiferent about tft (riot games) , mortdog the main guy working on it is challenger (highest rank) and while he isn't the top 50 players from what I remember he has a very good idea of the game

Valve should do a think where for like a year they hand CS2 over to a brand new cabal of devs who preferably don't play the game, or if they do they are not be allowed to have over 10K ELO. Just to see what kind of bullshit happens and break the brains of the pro scene. Train bots using Donk demos. Fuck it.

Often how devs *expect* players to play the game isn't how they actually *do* play the game - or something that is a minor issue if it happens infrequently becomes a major issue to any player unlucky enough to experience it many times in a row. Devs are always flying partly blind, no matter how dedicated they are. Even devs who play their game constantly can run into issues because they get USED to the problems and they start to feel 'comfortable' with them. Often playing a game too much numbs you to the major pain points, while exacerbating minor annoyances that might not even bother most players. It's important to regularly play competing games in the genre for this reason, to learn what the standards actually are and remember there are better ways to do things. You also should watch new players, expert players, and a lot of other players streaming to see how they experience the game, read community feedback, etc... All that is completely doable. If you don't have a dayjob. But you also have to make the game. And you should have some hours for things besides the game too. It's a constant resource management puzzle. Very easy to miss things.

what does the phrase "best weapons" mean if a bunch people don't have them. you're meant to feel bad if you didn't buy the best things.

What no QA testers does to a mf

good riddance if you asked me, i did the same for L4D2 Versus

Good thing bro the people that play this game and the game itself is garbage I might put it in my list of the worst overrated game of all time its that bad along with fortnite league ect

There is absolutely a bias, presumably because the game wants a 4:1 ratio, meaning Survivors being happy with the role is more valuable to the devs that Killers' enjoyment.

It's to make the game better for new players (mainly new survivors)

Ruin/Undying killer meta lasted three months. Unbreakable/Decisive strike meta lasted 5 years. There's a pretty clear bias, like you said.

@@athrielleviera678 only three months I thought it was at least a year

i wonder what the person who wrote that is doing now

​@@rndThursday hopefully playing Civ VI

@rndThursday youd think playing something else

@@yannickgrignon2473 Civ 6 was so shit that they had to give away free copies of it in order to get a player base.

​@@SyndicateOperative as a civ noob ive always liked it, whats so wrong with it?

I mean, playing the game is important cause you can then see how you can improve your balance decisions on the game in the future until you decide to stop it

DBD devs are the most out of touch devs out there. They proudly admit that they dont play their own game and have no idea about anything. They just use some flawed statistic for their work.

​@@someaccount5200 That would be a good point, but that only happens if the devs can maintain impartiality and objectivity when researching potential balance problems or coming up with improvements; those who are not just play testing but consuming their own product tend to fall victim to the same biases that consumers do.

@@Darkstar198 I'd even argue that devs generally have stronger but more hidden biases than players at large. That's why outside feedback is important.

@@robertnomok9750the final decision is up to lead designers and they almost never play their own games. Even if the game studios had a big round table weekly meeting where they consulted all their employees on game balance you would still have a majority of people have no idea what they’re talking about. Imagine working on a game, staring at character models, playtesting the content, coding, receiving community feedback (death threats) AND going home and launching the game that you work on. If someone does it, it’s like 2-3 people in the company who do not represent the playerbase with its varying playstyles and skill levels. What you’re left with is relying on community feedback, but look at any community of a pvp game, these people couldn’t give a crap about “balance”, they want their main to be strong and screw everybody else who’s trying to enjoy the game. Especially in DbD where everyone wants their own. Not only are skill levels juxtaposed but the roles aren’t your Overwatch variety of “character archetype” in a team of 5-6, it’s one strong character chosen from a roster with drastic differences in power levels and a team of four weak characters who function the same. Imagine asking someone who mains an F-tier killer in mid-ranks for their opinions on balancing the whole killer roster in *all* ranks. It’s not possible to keep the no-lifers who spend hours on the game daily happy while not scaring the beginner players with the likes of Pig who still absolutely stomps noobs while getting nerfed every few months. The devs are very much average in how they treat the game balance compared to other companies, the game itself just has an extremely peculiar design and a playerbase that is never happy and doesn’t actually know what it wants.

Oftentimes the issue for me isn’t even the balance of the asymmetrical game I’m playing, it’s that usually one side is way more fun to play than the other which means 50% of the time I’m guaranteed to not have fun just on a base level. In DBD I’d want to play the killer all the time because that sounds more fun to me than playing walking away sneakily simulator, like if ykyk

@@collinsnow2203 Survivor is like only fun with friends.

I think left 4 dead had the right approach. Every match players swap sides and play as both the infected, and survivors. Even if survivors were stronger than infected at high levels, it didn't matter as much because both sides had to play rounds as infected.

@@huckmart2017 That’s good example of proper asymmetrical balancing. Too bad they couldn’t make Back for Blood as good as that.

@@collinsnow2203Survivor is only really fun to play with at least one friend I feel.

we need a group therapy session cuz same

Same. And on the same killer too. I try to hook everyone at least once before deciding how sweaty I’m going to play. But if I double hook everyone at 5 or 4 gens I normally just let them all go. Matches like that aren’t really fun for anyone. And then the next match I’ll get curb stomped by a bunch of no migher bunny fengs with sniper rifle flashlights and head on. The matchmaking bands must be incredibly wide.

​@@danirodriguez3682 it bothers me that tunneling is just the best strategy in a lot of situations, just knock this survivor out and gens (on paper) go 75% speed, especially if you can manage to hook them next to an already partially repaired generator, and then just play within a certain area of the hook until theyre dead, only giving chase if you know for a fact this survivor will be downed. Shit, you dont even have to hook camp them all the way just to second stage and then remember whos on their last. Like I have yet to see a proper counter to just "fuck this guy in particular". You have to bodyblock and even then, its not hard to get around a bodyblock or simply just take the free hit and continue tunneling. Shame to admit I did this when I was new, nowadays i dont really bother doing anything boring i just chase survivors and kick a gen if its convenient. I just play to win chases because the chase is the fun part of the game, and i dont care about my rank? Its literally more fun in lower ranks where people are running weird builds, gens are done at a reasonable rate, ect. billy aura build still the most fun thing on the planet, crossmap chainsaw hits are the best thing to do its so fun, esp with the perk that lets you see survivors at the start of the game, they dont realize im coming right for them off the rip

IMO, it's fine for the same killer to be top tier for multiple years as long as that killer is fun to play as/play against/watch. Dunno if the Nurse meets that description, mind.

@@athath2010 yeah exactly. I'm fine with Spirit, Blight and Huntress being so high-tier because they're interesting to fight and actually interact with the map geometry

Intermediate to hard but yeah. You know what's funny? One day, someone's gonna reply with a nerd emoji to this reply here.

​@@linkibear8644 👰🏿‍♂️

​@@linkibear8644😎

​@@linkibear8644🤓

🤓 ​@@linkibear8644

Predecessor is even worse, believe it or not. I don't get t-bagged and flashlight clicked into oblivion there, but everybody hates their own teammates just as much as they hate the enemy team.

Then how to properly balance a game as a game developer? You don't think of balancing a game, is that all?

@@razorback9999able I think nonsense decisions come from relying too much on stats, games are too complicated to treat it like a balance sheet where they try to hit magical 50-50 win rates on everything. Stats don't come close to telling the whole story of why things are the way they are. The best way would also be the most time consuming so I understand why they don't do it - playing the game with the community and taking feedback

IMO the main issue with trying to balance through stats is that it ignores making the game actually fun to play. Players don't actually notice or care a lot of the time if something is statistically slightly better than something else but feels similar to use. However, they will notice if you nerf said thing in tangible ways that make it less effective. The goal of balance shouldn't really be to make it as even as flipping a coin, but to be as enjoyable for the players as possible.

​@@KittyTheKat441the stats didn't also take into consideration the time allotments the players had. Prolly need to separate players with 30 hrs experience from the newbies. 50 hrs separated from 30 hrs, 100 hrs separated from 50, etc.

every dbd player be like: "true"

@@rndThursday true

true

True

no you did not, npc comment

he basically said "skill issue" before getting *MASSIVELY* _skill issue'd_

Death is not an escape

Me with Warframe

Dead by Daylight's toxicity really is magnificent. Never in any other game I've played (No, I haven't played League) have I encountered such excessive vitriol. And I played Overwatch competitive.

I escaped for over a year and a half and mistakenly played a match after missing it like you would miss a line of cocaine. Now I’m trapped again 😢

@@LilacHeather I'm so sorry to hear.

it was his favorite actually! idk if it still is, just remember him saying that at the time

2024 and you still don't know his name?

@@siei3i37What does the year have to do with knowing an obscure developer’s name?

@@siei3i37 who needs to

@@angel_of_rust I mean if he still plays DBD then it's kinda crazy that he still doesn't know his name

LOL

It takes a lot of class to admit something like that publicly. Good on you.

I was in the same boat. Wth

i clicked and watched fully and just prooved myself it was a waste of time

Been playing dbd since 2017. Every part of this video rattled me, it's like going to a senior center with Vietnam war footage

i like to domesticate the survivors i play against

​​​@@rndThursday ​ 01. is, that....the eve online franchise's (00:00)? 02. '-of The Worst Balanced Game Ever'. (Shortly, for now): Feh. those 'fellows', Majority on the Destinyverses franchise's (More so about their own PvP/player-only multiplayer. one of the root causes of bungo's current IP's state) section is relatively Fitting for that, yes (to This Day still. meanwhile, a bit sad for the Destiny 1 game's then. still having a forever, update-less, Broken Crucible section of modes ever since bungo and us all moved forward into the 'sequel''s lifespan). for a Big Example. (Gameplay-wise speaking).

@@CaptainPilipinasAre you okay?

@@blazaybla22 Keep in mind his comment was edited. So this unreadable brain diarrhea is what resulted from them trying to fix what was presumably worse before. I shudder to imagine.

​@@CaptainPilipinaswhat the fuck?

I would love a show where the devs of games that have horribly unhappy communities are forced to see the problems in their game live.

next step is make the executives who order microtransactions and lootboxes to be added into games be forced to obtain all the random items without spending money

Call it "The Grind" and challenge devs of games with a lot of backlash to reach one of the highest MMR tiers. If they win it's a big sponsorship bundle but if they give up they have to live with the shame of it being televised.

it should be noted that Soren Johnson was the lead designer of Civilization IV "It's a good game, just play that!"

Yup its important to make your game have reliable vector of enjoyment that are parallel to those of success.

I firmly stand behind the fact that players ruin games just as much as devs do. People have been meta slaving and tryharding since before streamers and the big KZfaq boom simply because people will do anything to win because their fun isn't drawn from the games they play, its from how well they do at said games. It's a people problem, from the devs lack of legwork to the abrasive playerbases who make playing these games insufferable. People need to teach their kids not everything is about winning and the experience of doing what you like is more important than perceiving yourself as being really good at doing what you like.

@@maybelater2010I don’t really mind people who try their best to win. That’s on the devs to make the meta non-toxic. When I blame the players is things like bully squads who aren’t trying to win and just waste as much time as possible

@@maybelater2010 From a young age it's drilled into your head that you get rewarded for doing the correct thing / giving the right answer, and punished if you do anything but that. I think some people may be very susceptible to this and don't have the space in their mind to consider why they have to do this or any other option. They just have to exploit, cheat, metaslave and ruin any semblance of fun or variety. Now combine this with basically 0 consequences in online gaming and most importantly; unable to choose who you play with (If you act like a dick, nobody is gonna play with you anymore in real life) and you end up with a small % of toxic players ruining it for the rest.

bros skull can hardly contain that massive brain

@@rndThursday the webcam had a filter on he'd look like megamind if there wasn't a filter

he actually didn't get up at all, he levitated away from the desk

He used his massive IQ to edit his stream in real-time and make it look like he left

That shit cracked me up, what an intellectual chad

There is much more money to be made from survivors

the only essays i can make (im illiterate)

CRAZY PSYCHO FORCES innocent (and very handsome) audience into watching his INSANE RAMBLINGS (true story) (very scary)

forsenLevel yourself

I am max leveling

@@rndThursday The pyro pipeline

funny u say that cuz thats what they almost did with the twins rework lol (they decided to cancel it after the community response)

To be fair, there are a few killer things that stayed in the game long past their welcome. Blight and Nurse were absolutely cracked for far too long to be healthy, Spirit's original design was horrifically uninteractive, old Undying, Shape's tombstone+piece (while that could be argued as a license decision, they _buffed_ tombstone, and tombstone piece still exists along side it for no real reason). That's not to say that there wasn't problems with survivor mechanics, too. Both had-and in some cases _have_ , mechanics that aren't designed well. This isn't even a "one side is favored more" thing, this is a "there is a non-zero chance that the current devs can't understand the code of the game enough to make meaningful changes" problem. And that's concerning for the overall health of both the game and the company. Rant over, thanks for reading; if we met I'd offer you a firm handshake-no hard feelings, your opinion is valid.

The things to keep in mind is that the "I Win Button" largely comes in the form of perks, and how you get perks? You buy characters and grind to unlock perks. The game is technically p2W BUT you still have to grind like it's a mobile game. DbD is a unique abomination in gaming.

​@@FreeArtFreestheWorldNot to mention DbD has the monetization of a F2P game despite being pay to play

​@Clown_the_Clown Don't mean to be that guy but it's despite

Yep I love to watch streams but the gameplay is just simply not fun. You either stomp or get stomped.

don't play it

I've heard people speak ill of it a few times over the years but holy crap I didn't know it was THIS bad. I actually thought it might have been a decent game that just had salty players, after watching this video I realize how wrong I was. And how fortunate I am that I never decided to try the game. You're right in that it's fascinating how much salt the game produces yet people still play it anyway.

@@JohnDoeWasntTaken You should look up its tournament history lmao

Basically Tf2, OW, Paladins

It's why the game basically devolved into smurfing to pubstomp newbies who then quit the game. Ultimately destroying the long term playerbase.

The problem is that a stealth focus gameplay would still be tedious than what we currently have, just in a different way You get survivors who can get hooked a total of 3 times before they die, on huge maps - you'd still likely lose as a killer, but with zero player interactivity in that regard. I think other asym games tried to remedy this, like Texas Chainsaw Massacre, but then those games also suffered from the playerbase complaining about players being too stealthy which led to them speeding the game up a little.

@@cattysplatthe game has a consistent player base, it’s not dying or dead, and I haven’t seen a game where there are as much players with thousands of hours.

Look man I’m sorry but this sounds like a massive skill issue, if someone is really lopping your ass to the point where it is no longer beneficial to down them, then finding some else is a better idea because you might find them on a part of the map with easier loops and pallets or even complete dead zones. If you still cannot down them then play a different killer, there are more than 30 each with unique abilities that excel at different tactics. Want an early hit mixed with hit and run stealth? play Wraith. you want fast paced high adrenaline gameplay with great movement? Pick up Blight. you want strong anti loop with zoning ? Then pick up the pyramid head. Also on the matter of stealth, it become increasingly boring the more stealthy the player base gets, we can see that now with the perk “diversion” where it basically negates all aura reading perks and suppresses your scratch marks afterwards. There are several stealth perks that can work well but is that really what you want? To never interact with the killer and have them looking around for you until they spot you in a corner halfway through the game? With so many killers and so many abilities you would choose to just do gens and not interact with the most fun part of the game.

The problem here isn't stealth (as others already mentioned), but the MMR system being so broken Killer, especially newbies vs newbies, should easily get 2~4 kills (as in 6~12 hook stage) as this game is and should pro killers. Survivor should be terrified of the killers and do nothing their whole game until they finally learn something. But since MMR and balance issue, there is always some good survivors/killers in the match ready to destroy the opposite team, or killer just bring NOED and raise their MMR incorrectly. I still play this game as there is no game feels like it, but I seriously have no hope in their balancing

i've literally only heard of the game's title before (never saw any gameplay) and yet it was explained so nicely so that I knew what was going on.

Same here. Never seen footage before now, but am now morbidly fascinated by this game.

you certainly sound like someone who's never played paper mario and the thousand year door

lmaooo. somebody noticed. f that killer

@@rndThursday based and tinfoil-mask-pilled

@@rndThursdayI’m absolutely convinced that skull merchant was at one point a predator collaboration even that fell through during development

Mf sounds like she is from Dead -V- Cells

​@@rndThursdayi actually did the same thing, purposely ignoring her and getting her perks as teachables from the shrine of secrets. i'm currently on my all achievement grind and want the two achievements related to her to be the only ones i'll never get

He must have been very alpha smegma kekpilled individual not to womp womp

​​@@buggothTruman was in fact, pretty based

More like TrueMan

This is factually incorrect.

Source: I saw it in a movie

he thought he cooked

hes not the CEO his last name is CETO

Sweaty players really should do this tho

@@Starpotion Whether or not that's the case you, as a dev or any other salesman, should not be directing your audience to a rival or different product. It's bad for business and can even lead to bankruptcy because no one will be interested in your product, causing sales to plummet and leaving your company in financial stress.

I want to believe that the day before he bought a bunch of stocks in Sid Meier

they wanted fun by making spending money never was about balance

Its because of the spreadsheet deving they do, they legit just made a whole revamp to twins, only too have the revert the whole things within hours because it was so bad. They are no redoing the whole thing and the community's response was "Hey how about asking us next time instead of wasting all this time and money on this?

thats definitely a big part of it

Unfortunately DbD reverses this. Survivors get a ton of information, and Killers really don't.

@@Clown_the_Clownyea that’s what they just said

@@Clown_the_Clown killers CAN get a lot of Information with perks and If they pay attention to their surroundings

@@aWigglyssame time though, SWF isn’t a perk and breaks the game

I played this game years ago and I got to say, this is not a good suggestion because DBD is not played as a party game. In party games it is fun to have a RNG factor that can shift things around, but DBD is played with a really serious and competitive mind set, both sides hate vehemently when things go wrong to them. Some things as simple as a bad totem spawn already make killers go mad during a match. Survivors moan when a windows doesn't spawn where they want, even. In the case of the tripping, one of survivors greatest prides and achievments is being able to loop the killer for a long, long time. If you take this from them they might actually start DDOSING the devs, if not worse.

Ego.

thats what happens when the fanbase just complain

The funniest part? He was absolutely right

What do you expect him to say? If you don't enjoy DBD, then leave. If you used to have fun and now don't, you're probably burned out. Once frustrations overtake fun, quit. The devs are doing their best to mitigate frustration and make it more fun but not everyone is gonna like it.

​@@famulanrevengeance3044that just prove the game is complete garbage lol who in their right mind would play a game which even the own dev tell you to play something else

@@DOGEELLL The developer tells you to play something else if you're getting burned out and frustrated. He is not responsible for your emotions. It's a difficult, competitive game with many factors outside of your control. Deal with it, or leave.

spitting fax yuri. annoying that some killers have god tier addons that make them overpowered, but then you got trapper addons that make traps not hurt you

The problem there is that you get communities like League of Legends' where players insult devs for nerfing things they hate as abuse of power. E.g. the ping incident where a dev was accused of removing pings because he got spam pinged in a game, or when Pyke got nerfed a month after a dev got absolutely owned by a Pyke player. They were unrelated, but players are gonna make shit up to cope anyway.

@@jonaza2105 You are delusional if you think developers don't have favourites based on what they play.

@@cattysplat you are delusional if you think that a) single devs have enough power to push biased balance changes by themselves and that b) these balance changes aren't made by entire balance teams based on multivariate analyses (eg winrate, player satisfaction, rank distribution, etc). Either way, you didn't disprove my point which was exactly that because Devs can be personally biased, that's why they tend to balance with math rather than just throwing out opinions. + Even in a perfect world where devs arent biased, players will still accuse them of being biased.

@yuri_8368 hey where did you get your profile pic from

So "Legion is not powerful and is bad" but at the same time "You will still die regardless what you try to do"

@@wickermind6668 Legion could only guarantee one kill, maybe two max, per match because the process took so long. Meanwhile these were the days of hillbilly instasaw where you were dead within a second of him catching up to you It was horribly slow murderer with a spoon shit. You would die eventually but your team would be fine if they weren't brain dead.

@@commiekin - Uses a lil shaft - Built like a twink - Still manages to be able to down half the survivors team before the match ends Legion the Gigachad

yes, and just like DbD, the survivors are at an advantage granted the L4D2 survivors CAN defend themselves properly unlike the DbD ones, but still, military sniper op lol

You can succeed without being an asshole in DBD if you just put in a little effort and realize that you're not always going to win the match. Yet, good performance will lead you to ranking up regardless. But people don't want to do that. Face camping used to be a guarantee of a kill. I guess some killers were so childish they couldn't handle the survivors having even the smallest victory and putting in effort to hook someone else was too much. And yet it made the game boring as fuck as EVERYONE now sits afk- The killer, the hooked person, the people doing gens and the person trying to rescue the hooked person, literally of them are afk because of this. It's insane how anyone accepted this, including the devs, should've been punished with suspensions. If a soccer team scores a point and then refuses to play, they don't automatically win, they get suspended and lose.

My exact thoughts. Only other time I've played this game aside from when it first launched was when pyramid head got added. I then uninstalled the game after realizing what a sweat fest the game had evolved into😂

I find this to be true. The most fun survivors have in this game is fucking around with the killer, which... on its own isn't bad if the community was more friendly, but it's not.

Evolution of the meta is the most fascinating yet horrible thing to witness in multiplayer game development. I've seen your tf2 vids before so I know you have much familiarity with that 😂😂

democracy never sleeps

@@rndThursday that's one more video for the right side of history.

Liberty has seen this video through

Title??

literally every meta was bullshit

And that's what makes dbd the best. The meme material is ENDLESS!!!

people quite literally make those exact jokes, "We've noticed nurse has been far too oppressive at the higher levels of the game, so we have decided to nerf the pig"

as an oldschool LoL player, my first thought was "better nerf twitch" because, my god, at the beginning of LoL, twitch was nerfed again and again and again

@@Dr.AvenVon Stealth being nerfed in LoL constantly because kid casual doesn't understand how stealth works or how to counter or play defensive.

Better nerf blackbeard

better nerf genji

Tbh nurse calling should have never worked with doctor power to begin with lmao. Perks should never affect directly powers or balance becomes problematix

making a perk reveal healing on any killer while also revealing one particular action on a certain killer makes no sense at all

@@broextraordinary4063 Agree to disagree. Personally, I think designing perks to meaningfully interact with a killer’s unique design adds flavor, depth, and variety to the game. I’ll concede that this is clearly contrary to the direction BHVR wants to take the game in (as recently evidenced by the nerf to STBFL), but I nonetheless believe that their binary approach to perk design has played a massive role in the game’s stagnant killer meta. Call me a contrarian, but I think it’s a good thing when some killers can make better use of a perk than others.

@@Undkor it is right that some killers should gain more value from s perk than others. But perks shouldn't affect the power itself or that becomes a mess. Example: Third seal and Ruin are top tier on twins because they almost always use victor and as such these two perk synergies with what the power causes but not with the power itself. OR Wesker gain more value from starstruck, but that's because he has 40 meters terror radius and it doesn't affect directly his power

Pigstep by Lena Raine (From Minecraft)

@@alicetheaxolotl how could i forget about pigstep

💖

dbd has a lot going for it that keeps it so popular (almost nothing to do with the game itself) 1. licenses for very popular franchises 2. lots of entertaining content creators 3. (probably most importantly) nearly no competitors in the market. games like VHS or Friday the 13th were promising but shut down it has tried improving the jank and visuals over the years, but at a snails pace tbh

@@rndThursday I guess that makes sense. I tried getting into it briefly because I liked Otzdarvas DS2 content so much in the past, but I just didn't get it. Good luck kicking the habit, and good job on the video!

DBD Is obviously so popular cause It's fun to play for a ton of people, also partly because people can play some cool characters from their favorite franchises.

@@rndThursday For the devs and their apparent lack of talent at making a game or even remotely balancing it, it probably was the right decision to just overlay counter upon counter for the previous unbalanced stuff instead of putting in lots of hours into still failing to fix it and instead pour the money into licenses that let them get people to play "as their favourite killer".

​@@b130610 the Otz Dark Souls to DbD downfall has to be studied

im like a tree

Evolve may had terrible monetization but at least you had stuff to do during a match

bro's just a bad teammate

Yea that’s all I can think of when I watch DBD clips… it’s like evolve with pallets

Evolve deserved better

I miss evolve it was very fun. There just wasn't a player base. After just a few months it became very one sided either the monster couldn't do squat or the survivors couldn't do squat. I enjoyed the three months I had 🤣