A look at a returned Brymen BM235 with a very unusual fault. Subscribe on LBRY: eevblog.tv Crypto Donations: www.eevblog.com/crypto-currency/
Пікірлер: 290
@markkrutzmann68624 жыл бұрын
I like that you keep investing failures of "your" meters. Makes interesting videos and improves probably not this but multiple lines of devices. Keep on going Dave!
@Matraxea4 жыл бұрын
Did you notice its doing it in a pattern? It goes: 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 pause, repeat. It's extremely consistent. Something in the logic is definitely doing it. Looks like it's timed with the refresh of the LCD too....
@PlasmaHH4 жыл бұрын
My guess would be it has something to do with the autoranging "leaking over", maybe even internally accidentally connecting the reference wrong. Its probably on the asic.
@Chrisamic4 жыл бұрын
Brian I saw that too. It's static on the 5, but flashes the real reading four times quickly and then pauses on the 5. The period for one complete cycle is just slightly over 2 seconds (close to 2.2 seconds, maybe). Only the designers would know what on the processor might be cycling at this speed and with that pattern. Some auxiliary function is bleeding over and affecting the display output, but is otherwise leaving the critical functions unaffected. Another clue is that it is causing a display error on V and A settings, but is only causing some barely noticeable flickering on resistance and diode settings - again that might only mean something to the ASIC designers.
@robbieaussievic4 жыл бұрын
...... It's Morse, I decoded it, "Seven castaways marooned on deserted isle"
@muppetpaster4 жыл бұрын
@@robbieaussievic WILSON!!!!!!!!!
@ChristophPech4 жыл бұрын
It says "Help, I'm stuck in a Chinese multimeter factory"
@SimonCoates4 жыл бұрын
5:31 "Light at the right angle" - no no no Dave, it's all about getting the tongue at the right angle 😁
@AvidiaNirvana4 жыл бұрын
The first time I read that, it sounded dirty. Lol
@1HotLegendLS4 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@PsiQ4 жыл бұрын
there is an electrician imprisoned in a workplace somewhere and he reprogrammed it for SOS but didnt get it done right...
@paulgray13184 жыл бұрын
Aye, that would be 5000 5000 5000 2001 (sooo sooo sooo cool)
@voltlog4 жыл бұрын
Brilliant guess 😁
@megkalapnemadom4 жыл бұрын
try the range button. if it is a 5 V issue then the "5" will jump a decimal, if it is a leftmost digit issue then the "5" will stay on the left
@johnmorgan16294 жыл бұрын
Dave don't see enough sellers doing this, levels of honesty in new nevermind older products that you show.
@thephantom14924 жыл бұрын
Hey Dave, 3:30, you can see why they discharged 'unevently'. Top is a NiMH while bottom is alkaline!
@maicod4 жыл бұрын
quite a careless usage of the owner I might say :(
@Ghozer4 жыл бұрын
I spotted this too, potentially the cause of the failure....
@hotgluegunguy4 жыл бұрын
@@Ghozer it's definitely not a good idea, but how would it cause the failure?
@Ghozer4 жыл бұрын
@@hotgluegunguy asside from the different chemistries of the batteries, one potentially charging/overcharging the other, and different material types mixing, and the potential to cause a fire, the actual current they are capable of is different also, resistances, allsorts, so who knows exactly what issues it could cause...
@hotgluegunguy4 жыл бұрын
@@Ghozer I still don't see what damage it would cause here, as the batteries are not charged by the device. High series resistance could cause unstable operation, but I can't imagine it damaging the meter. I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just curious as to why you arrived at that assumption.
@JimGriffOne4 жыл бұрын
Looks like it's generating some noise somewhere and it is trying to autoscale to the fast fluctuations in the noise. EDIT: So, it shows the correct voltage and toggles range. Then it can't be noise. I'm probably wrong. Definitely looks like a processing issue now.
@grogyan4 жыл бұрын
At 2:30 My guess is there is a broken capacitor attached to the voltage reference
@stevenspmd4 жыл бұрын
And this is why Dave is able to sell meters, absolutely no BS .. I have two already; thinking about a 121gw :-)
@henninghoefer4 жыл бұрын
I have one and I regret buying it. The first firmwares were slow and the recent ones tend to drift. The display hasn't got a lot of contrast (even at max setting) and there's no way to read the SD without taking it out of the meter. I recommend watching kzfaq.info/sun/PLZSS2ajxhiQDDs_mWPLavaveGe0RGEw1M before ordering one.
@floris_vde4 жыл бұрын
@@henninghoefer Agree with you, I really don't like the 121GW. It messed up some measurements because of a low battery, and at that point you've just fucked up my confidence completely.
@equitimer4 жыл бұрын
I had both types of EEVBlog meters (121GW and BM235). The BM lost all function of its buttons, and the 121GW I barely trust to measure DCV under 10 volts. The AC measurements are downright dangerous to trust when checking if an AC circuit has 110V/230V live voltage on it and trying to measure ripple on something like +24V DC is just impossible. The AC+DC measurements ranges are not specified in the datasheet. The fanboys at the EEVBlog forum thinks this is fine, as they know the inside of the meter by heart...that is NOT what I expect to need when I buy a DMM. I want a datasheet. I bought it from the KS campaign so naturally there was no datasheet at the time. I have learned my lesson, I will never again any instrument carrying the EEVBlog on it...But each to their own!
@larryscott39824 жыл бұрын
Notice the 5 cycles on regular timed intervals.
@Zadster4 жыл бұрын
Internal bondwire fracture - maybe on something related to the voltage reference. Making just enough contact to supply a reference, then draws current and the failed junction goes non-linear, add a tiny amount of capacitance and it oscillates?
@uzaiyaro4 жыл бұрын
Could you test this with some percussive maintenance while the thing is powered and see if anything changes, or is everything kind of set in stone with the packaging? Would be curious to know if this is a viable diagnostic method.
@malgailany4 жыл бұрын
Please spend some time on finding the fault on the BM235, this subject is interesting.
@lcdconsultant52524 жыл бұрын
Since Dave has access to the company he should definitely get a replacement CPU and put it in. What if that does not fix it? Reasons to fix it: 1) You got to be very curious why the meters you sell died. 2) It will probably sell another 50 meters. 3) You can call it a tutorial on replacing SMD components.
@MetalheadAndNerd4 жыл бұрын
I wonder why Dave doesn't put much time into his channel anymore. He said that this is his main job. So what else eats up so much time that he cannot do fundamentals or anything with some work behind anymore?
@computerman2004 жыл бұрын
I have had meters that a voltage reference ic takes a dump after the meter gets hit with high voltage...dose similer things
@cburgess52944 жыл бұрын
I bought a 235 directly from Brymen and 1 month after the warranty expired it developed a calibration error that prevent it from measuring any voltages. Shipped it back to Brymen and they re-calibrated it and sent it back - it did take about 90 days to get it back but at least they repaired it.
@WacKEDmaN4 жыл бұрын
nice job of mixing batteries!... noticed one is rechargable (the low voltage one)
@leonkernan4 жыл бұрын
That's why I stick to Eneloops (and not just because I bought them from DSE like they were toilet paper)
@Thebigmanmetaldetecting4 жыл бұрын
@@leonkernan hahahaha
@5speedfatty4 жыл бұрын
went to check the comments before i mentioned the very same. good eye mate
@sarah13904 жыл бұрын
I seen that too right off the bat. 1.3 V is about as high as a rechargable one gets from my experience
@chocolate_squiggle4 жыл бұрын
Yeah that's a glorious example of terrible marketing by Energizer! First thing I thought when I first saw Energizer "Eco" branded batteries was that they must be rechargeable cells. So I'm not surprised they've been mixed up with an actual Ni-Mh cell. But no, turns out they're just made of a whopping FOUR percent recycled materials. I'm not sure you could get much more disingenuous.
@MrMaxeemum4 жыл бұрын
You must have another scrap unit around that you could swap the processor with just to see if that cures it. it doesn't matter about calibration as you are unlikely to put the unit back in to service. It would just be good to see it through to the end.
@piratk4 жыл бұрын
It is very regular. The pattern repeats. I guess some cross talk from some counter, on a high bit causing a saturated value.
@nixxonnor4 жыл бұрын
The white lead on the input connector board looks a little toasted (visible between 9:11 and 9:20)
@Yrouel864 жыл бұрын
It looks to me like a hardened drop of rosin flux not a burn mark
@Kyle-Veilleux4 жыл бұрын
@@Yrouel86 Yeah, I think so too, I dont see a skid mark on the pcb near that wire. So probably flux.. My bet is an internal fault of the prosessor and that flashing 5 four times, then pauses and repeats consistently. Is some sort of fault indicator. Like maybe the eprom has corrupted somehow. It's weird for sure
@ronniepirtlejr26064 жыл бұрын
I noticed the same thing!
@cda324 жыл бұрын
Just some stray flux or conformal coating
@stargazer76444 жыл бұрын
@@Kyle-Veilleux Except that the folks that built the thing said there is no internal fault code.
@ianc49014 жыл бұрын
It's an interesting and very unusual fault, the fact that it is a repeating pattern makes it fascinating ! I would like to see a scope reading to measure the frequency of that pattern. Most of these guesses here show that most people really don't understand what they are seeing and either didn't watch the whole video or are assuming that Dave knows nothing about electronics and that he can't see what we can see in the video !
@devrim-oguz4 жыл бұрын
It looks like it blinks every 500 milliseconds for 4 times than stops for a second
4 жыл бұрын
Always very interesting videos. Thanks Dave for the time you spent for us. I just have a quick question : I saw on your PCB some resistors that is labeled RM in place of R. What is the meaning?
@Kyle-Veilleux4 жыл бұрын
the way the 5 flashes from 5 to 0 is almost like some sort of error code.. like it flashes 4 times then pauses then flashes 4 times and so on. almost like the check engine light on a car
@piotr864 жыл бұрын
My theory is the LCD driver is damaged. The segments change each time the processor refreshes the display, more often when measuring resistance than when measuring voltage. It looks like some bit of some internal counter (frequency divider or memory address counter) has a short to memory area of first digit's segments.
@yambo594 жыл бұрын
Ive got a similar lower model to this one, a 210A I think but in the Greenlee brand, and so far its been perfect, love it.
@nigeljohnson98204 жыл бұрын
Maybe ESD damage to the micro. Might be worth scoping the meter supply and comparing its current draw against a known good one. If the chip is damaged, its supply current may be higher.
@paulgray13184 жыл бұрын
"Let's switch this puppy on", bless, not heard that for too long, brilliant. Thank you for that happy nostalgia thought.
@jeffm27874 жыл бұрын
Both fuses good? Voltage spike perhaps trashed the asic driving the display? I had a Uni-T that someone blew the fuses which caused a voltage skip that got past the input protection and took out the main IC. Spot on except it had all the wrong ranges. Replaced the IC and it's been perfect.
@MatthewSuffidy4 жыл бұрын
Just guessing. It is showing the correct voltage intermittently, so the downstream of the ADC is ok. It is weird how the display is messing up which may show an electrical issue, like voltage leaking on a line, or dropping. It could be some kind of ADC communication breakup which is going to the max value.
@mcuembedded4 жыл бұрын
It could be a problem with the voltage reference. Or it could be an op-amp with a cracked solder joint or feedback resistor somewhere. Those are the only 2 things that could shoot the reading to the roof and back I would guess.
@diggitroman4 жыл бұрын
Hi, I've had a *very similar problem* with APPA305. Reason was, it somehow managed to erase its' own calibration EEPROM. Because I got it free with this error and it had some decent amount of counts, I decided to dig into this. It took me several hours to reverse engineer eeprom data mapping, and in the end, I've mapped all calibration data (I think except of temperature) and recalibrated it.
@steverobbins48724 жыл бұрын
Is there a voltage reference chip in there somewhere? If Vref is dropping to zero the display might read full scale.
@steverobbins48724 жыл бұрын
It looks like U2 is a LM385-1.2 voltage reference diode from Texas Instruments. Looks like it's being fed bias current via R27.
@station2404 жыл бұрын
@@steverobbins4872 I was looking for the reference voltage, U2 looked like the candidate for being one. A scope probe on that, and a few on the power pins for the micro should sort out where the issue is.
@Max-kc2rc4 жыл бұрын
@@station240 I couldn't agree more. Scope the shit out of that - Hook up a good meter right next to it, and just compare what is going on at various voltage-rails. (where you find deviations that rhythm of full-scale readings). My opinion is: having a non-broken copy of the device might be even better than having a schematic ;-)
@ThePoxun4 жыл бұрын
Is it possible its switching in a reference voltage for self calibration and the switching signal is not functioning? Or is there a pin on the ASIC that's pulsing at that frequency? Is there any ghost signal coming out of the input connections?
@nightshadelenar4 жыл бұрын
might be an issue with one of the registers getting an improper clock and/or ref voltage.
@uzaiyaro4 жыл бұрын
Can you measure the input to the logic side to see if something is feeding 5v into it? Although this kind of failure doesn't explain the A/mA weirdness to me. I'm brand new to electronics, green as grass, so I'd love to learn more about this, and if this develops into anything. Will scoping any of the logic test points (if there are any?) help at all? I'm probably talking complete nonsense, but I'd love to see more diagnosis of this.
@RobertSzasz4 жыл бұрын
Just a random thought. But could there be a 5v rail connected to a mux? I assume it's in package package on die so there's not an external chip to replace but might that be doing it?
@chrislott19944 жыл бұрын
When I saw this, I wondered if the design has a auto-cal, or sanity check circuit, that’s executed on boot up. I can imagine a built-in circuit, like BIT, that switches the input between ground, 5V, etc. If the control signals for such a circuit went berserk, it might cause these symptoms.
@zebedie24 жыл бұрын
If the measurement is spot on, could it be the communication between the processor and the lcd? if it's an spi or i2c, could the processor be reading the values correctly but experiencing noise when sending that over to the lcd controller? 5 is 0101 in binary btw
@LazerLord104 жыл бұрын
Maybe a stupid suggestion, but could it be the most-significant bit (MSB) of their custom ASIC going weird? IDK how they make their ASICs or what each of the pins does, but maybe a bond wire somewhere that's related to the MSB is faulty. Not that I've ever heard of them failing, but it's all I can think of. The randomness makes it look like a floating pin or something.
@Okurka.4 жыл бұрын
Time to get the nitric acid out and decap the ASIC.
@ThePoxun4 жыл бұрын
Its not random. On voltage anyway. Its a regular sequence of 5 pulses. its four pulses showing the correct reading then the 5th pulse just shows the max range. edit: the other ranges have a pattern too but different from voltage.
@neosandi62 жыл бұрын
5:59 J1 or U5 looks some thing burn out
@bobert45224 жыл бұрын
@eevblog2 I would probably take another meter out of the scrap bin and swap the processor. Not too many pins so shouldn’t take too long I don’t think. Would be interesting to see if it persisted, might be the silicon.
@gregclare4 жыл бұрын
I was going to buy one of these, but I got no reply to my question on the EEVBlog Store, or on the eBay listing. So, I figured that support communication would probably also be nonexistent. So, didn’t end up getting one.
@Petertronic4 жыл бұрын
That's a weird fault, I'd be fascinated to see more in depth troubleshooting...
@soothcoder4 жыл бұрын
Could the clock frequency on the processor be off enough to stuff up the ADC? Or could the clock be erratic?
@jaredwright59174 жыл бұрын
My first guess on seeing its behavior, and the fact it happens in any mode, is that it has dual ADCs that it alternates between to get measurements and one of them is not working anymore for some reason.
@AussieJeepBasher4 жыл бұрын
The meters that get sent back for repairs, do you then sell them on at a reduced price? If so ide be keen on one.
@donreid3584 жыл бұрын
What happened to "always check power supplies"? If the processor is given an out-of-spec supply voltage then it may misbehave.
@dl7majstefan7534 жыл бұрын
I had a fault in a scope, where a rubber key was stuck inside and made a permanent contact. Couldn´t be seen from outside. So the reaction on any input was weird. Check all rubber keys for correct operation.
@KeanM4 жыл бұрын
Seems like a internal silicon issue to me. Not sure how the main processor and LCD driver communicate and the format of display data, but it could be just a display data corruption considering it only affects the most significant digit and in a repeatable way.
@Mecalas4 жыл бұрын
Shot in the dark here - Is the reference crystal on spec? Can they be fractured internally yet still 'function' ? Will replacing the crystal still require re-calibration?
@TheFrenchMansControl4 жыл бұрын
@Dave if you can, try giving it a re-flash. What's the betting of a random bit flip in the firmware that causes a jump to the wrong part of code or some crap?
@stargazer76444 жыл бұрын
Dave didn't design or build this meter, Brymen did. He isn't going to have the code or hardware to flash it with.
@johncrowerdoe55274 жыл бұрын
@@stargazer7644 They might have given him a sealed black box flashing tool like you do for untrusted field techs.
@Metalhead-4life2 жыл бұрын
Did the broken inductor issue you made a previous video about turn out to be a common issue or was it a one off?
@scotthewitt60474 жыл бұрын
Very nice that you sent him a new one
@thamarv454 жыл бұрын
I've got the same problem with my old school Keihtley 175. Don't have clue what it is yet.
@Skauber4 жыл бұрын
Swap the asic (processor) with a good meter and see if it fixes it. Might be an internal fault in the asic, perhaps even reflashing it, if possible, with new firmware would fix it.
@neosandi62 жыл бұрын
5:59 J1 or U5 looks some thing burn out
@Skauber2 жыл бұрын
@@neosandi6 J1 is a jumper
@neosandi62 жыл бұрын
it look 's you are right , but it still look burned at place J1
@einarht214 жыл бұрын
Hello, did you try freezing the processor a little bit to to see if there is any change?
@hypersonicfox4 жыл бұрын
The thing is it doesn't appear to be random. On voltage mode you can see a pattern.
@Kyrad7774 жыл бұрын
8:10 - The surface of the black component in the lower screen just right of center.
@Okurka.4 жыл бұрын
R13?
@SidneyCritic4 жыл бұрын
I wonder if that half dead battery is a clue, ie, is something dragging the processor voltage down so it doesn't work correctly.
@riesmoos4 жыл бұрын
Maybe there is something wrong with the screen you use to watch this video, or you are just as blind as Dave himself. That is not a half dead battery, that is a rechargeable NiMH battery. It's just a different chemistry.
@kfitch424 жыл бұрын
Try swapping the main chip with one from a good meter?
@dragonfli0694 жыл бұрын
p.s. could this be made into a how to use your oscillisucope lesson to trace down the fault?
@antoniopetito4 жыл бұрын
R33 near the lower fuse looked as if it had a hole in it?
@KrotowX4 жыл бұрын
Definitely look like exceeded range measurement due to different ASIC chip properties in this particular multimeter or it can be software bug too. I'm curious are this glitch is only BM235 specific or it affect all BM2xx line? I ordered BM257s at yesterday and hope it will not show these funny 5-s.
@iamdarkyoshi4 жыл бұрын
Swap the asic with another meter, my bet's on a damaged asic... It toggles at a consistent frequency
@dennisseuferling8154 жыл бұрын
Do the eeprom chips carry any write data. I had an incident where a character byte was accidentally written to the wrong address on an eeprom and it caused the display to output the wrong character when called. Just something to check.
@alexmirica4 жыл бұрын
I have a 25q series EEPROM with similar weird behaviour, it bit flips at MSB every exactly 16 bytes sent. It was used as a font lookup table memory and a particular character on the display changes, as Dave's multimeter does. I exchanged emails with the manufacturer several times and they refused to believe that their EEPROM was delivered as faulty, they carefully test them, etc. The EEPROM was delivered with factory programmed fonts and I never used it. Just plugged it in my flash reader and bootloaded the fonts in my code. I had instantly saw the weird glitch, with exact repeatability. I copied its content in a blank EEPROM and it works flawlessly. It's not my circuit design fault, as the manufacturer claimed.
@dhpbear24 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure if' it's affecting the other digits, since you didn't connect up anything to measure, they show as zeroes (with the least significant digit 'bobbling'). Measure, say, 1.234 volts and see if it alternately displays "1.234" and "5.000"
@kjur184 жыл бұрын
It does measure fine, he said that then it alternates between measured voltage and 5.
@Tobinindustrial4 жыл бұрын
Very interesting issue. Following with interest.
@michelfeinstein4 жыл бұрын
Can you put it under the oscilloscope and see if any of the controller's pis are oscillating?
@piotr864 жыл бұрын
My other theory is a short circuit on the zebra stripes connecting the display to the board. My meter alternately displays 0.000 and -0.000. Maybe in this Brymen there is a short circuit between the driver lines of the minus symbol and the G segment of the first digit.
@ArnoldSzathmary4 жыл бұрын
😂 😂 😂 😂 😂 That's Good
@jordanwaughtal76494 жыл бұрын
How does the reset line of the chipset look?
@kevincozens68374 жыл бұрын
Not that it matters, but what firmware is in that meter? I noticed the RM1, RM2, RM3, and RM4 positions on the PCB. They look like option jumpers. I wonder what would happen if you played with them. I have two of the BM235 meters and they have different firmware revisions. That is one thing about the 121GW over the 235. Easy update of the built-in firmware.
@Audio_Simon4 жыл бұрын
ADC bias fault? My audio ADCs usually run with 1/2 VE bias.
@AngDavies4 жыл бұрын
What happened to: "though shalt always check voltages"? :P seriously though, isn't 5v a standard digital voltage value? Something being polled at regular intervals and it's somehow leaking onto the main sensing line/one of the grounds being weak and unable to sink enough stray voltage, would be interesting to see whether the relevant pin on the micro was actually seeing any stray voltages? One interesting thing to note: the volts reading is dc, and the millivolts is AC, but they both show something that looks like 5 to some exponent, that's important, because the only waveforms that have the same peak to peak and RMS values...are rectangular waves, i.e. some kind of logic and it's quite a regular pattern too
@muppetpaster4 жыл бұрын
Bit unlikely that it is 5 volts bang in everytime.....
@AngDavies4 жыл бұрын
@@muppetpaster 5v seems equally random otherwise it's not too of the range and it's not a power of two, plus it's a multimeter-i'd imagine it has to have precision voltage sources floating around to even work properly, and it's not quite bang on 5v every time anyway- sometime it shows a .01/.02 if I recall correctly Edit: hard to say it's switching to fast to say whether that .01 is tied to the 5v or to the 0v reading
@bigjd2k4 жыл бұрын
Dual slope integration lost its integrating part (cap)?
@cameronsteel61474 жыл бұрын
The alternating between 0 and 5 does seem to have a bit of a rhythm to it...no idea if that's relevant.
@devrim-oguz4 жыл бұрын
Not just a bit, it is completely regular.
@Marzec3094 жыл бұрын
Is there a bit from the ADC that is flickering?
@morphx6664 жыл бұрын
I think it is because I've seen many faulty ADCs doing the exact same thing
@1kuhny4 жыл бұрын
Possibly get a new asic and solder that in. As everyone said it is flickering at regular interval. Atleast putting a new one would eliminate some faulty silicon
@TheDefpom4 жыл бұрын
Op amp blown or open pull down resistor
@paulf10712 жыл бұрын
What about an unstable crystal o/p? Worth a quick probe ??
@mohammadr7974 жыл бұрын
Seems the best solution is to replace main chip with another good DMM ic's and do some comparison ...
@wdavem4 жыл бұрын
Maybe give it some crazy vibration and see if anything changes?
@germimonte4 жыл бұрын
Probably a stupid solution, but have you tried connecting it in parallel with another multimeter? Maybe it's working fine but leaking power to the measuring side somehow?
@kjur184 жыл бұрын
What happens when you switch ranges? Let's say, 50V instead of 5? Will it flash second digit or first?
@devrim-oguz4 жыл бұрын
It is an auto-ranging multimeter. But maybe applying a higher voltage might help.
@johncrowerdoe55274 жыл бұрын
@@devrim-oguz There's a manual ranging button in the row under the display.
@devrim-oguz4 жыл бұрын
It could be a both programmatical and hardware error. Because the digit 5 blinks with a constant pattern. (It blinks 4 times then stops for a while) Why don't you replace the MCU to see if it helps?
@alexmirica4 жыл бұрын
Dave, check the EEPROM. Read and check its contents several times. I have a 25q series EEPROM with similar weird behaviour, it bit flips at MSB every exactly 16 bytes sent. It was used as a font lookup table memory and a particular character on the display changes, as your multimeter does. I exchanged emails with the manufacturer several times and they refused to believe that their EEPROM was delivered as faulty, they carefully test them, etc. The EEPROM was delivered with factory programmed fonts and I never used it. Just plugged it in my flash reader to check if their fonts are fine and bootloaded the fonts in my code. I had instantly saw the weird glitch, with exact repeatability. I copied its content in a blank EEPROM and it works flawlessly. It's not my circuit design fault, as the manufacturer claimed. Maybe you have similar issue.
@p23q4 жыл бұрын
replace the chipset. take one from another broken bm235. would love to see you repair it and give it away to someone in need!
@higihups4 жыл бұрын
18:10
@byronwatkins25654 жыл бұрын
If it should measure the reference, the result would obviously be full scale. But I don't know why it would measure the reference unless it alternates between signal and reference using a switch.
@HomelabExtreme4 жыл бұрын
I would be nice if you would try to swap chips, just to confirm whether the fault follows the main CPU or the PCB, calibration wouldn't be important for that.
@t0nito4 жыл бұрын
It's a consistent pattern, that's for sure.
@GeorgeGeorge-xj2bc4 жыл бұрын
I would try to resolder the cpu chip to see if this could fix the problem.
@ahbushnell14 жыл бұрын
I did it. I bought you meter. It's really nice. Great for the price point! :)
@adriansrealm4 жыл бұрын
Looks like it is losing its ground. Bad pull up or pull down resistor?
@Audio_Simon4 жыл бұрын
Why are some traces un solder masked? 7:20
@proluxelectronics74194 жыл бұрын
The fault produces a repeating fixed pattern not random, internal cpu crosstalk fault??
@sanguchito73814 жыл бұрын
Was about to comment the same. Doesn't look random, there's an actual pattern for some reason.
@bernhardreinel4 жыл бұрын
#12 Freeze Spray the ICs #13 Send it off to the hydraulic press channel and get lunch.
@1HotLegendLS4 жыл бұрын
I'm looking to buy either the BM235 or the 121GW, just not sure which to get. I mostly do some Auto/Home DIY and minor electronics repair, nothing too deep.
@KeanM4 жыл бұрын
The BM235 is an excellent meter. I have 3 (one at home, 2 at the office) and they're the first meter I tend to reach for. If you need more advanced functions then the 121GW is good, but I generally prefer the BM869S or a bench meter in those cases. The 121GW is pretty impressive for feature set vs size.
@EEVblog24 жыл бұрын
The BM235 in that case. No need for anything fancier.
@1HotLegendLS4 жыл бұрын
@@EEVblog2 thank you Dave, cheers
@1HotLegendLS4 жыл бұрын
Ordered the BM235
@1HotLegendLS4 жыл бұрын
@@EEVblog2 Got the BM235 in today, excellent bit of kit. Had fun testing it out on a few things. Thanks Dave!! Lenny from Boston USA (Soon London UK)
@thsinger4 жыл бұрын
At round about minute 10 you can see a hand above the input jack, look like making high 5. I guess this is what the meter want to say. 🖐
@neosandi62 жыл бұрын
posible pul up / pull down R... ???
@albedo20204 жыл бұрын
1.check OP amps input stage. 2. check Ref. Voltage input stage (ref diide). 3. clean the contakts of the rotary switch (oxyde). 4. Glitch in the memory or cpu register?. 5. re-solder pins specially Opamp and mpu.
@michaelhawthorne86964 жыл бұрын
I've used a Mantis for years and I agree they are the 'Ducks Guts'....RM3 looks almost unsoldered on the left side (11:39) got to be a problem
@michaelhawthorne86964 жыл бұрын
14:40....If you get a proper reading when an input is connected and an erratic one when nothing is connected....suspect an input ground fault or an input fault of another kind.
@ianwalker37464 жыл бұрын
Batteries are mixed, rechargeable and ordinary, thats why voltages are different.
@sysghost4 жыл бұрын
Question: I see that some traces on the PCB are without soldermask the whole length. Why is that? What benefit does it provide?
@icestormfr4 жыл бұрын
Lower trace resistance due to the extra solder metal, I think Dave made a video about that practice. P.S. found it kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gp-haNmoqKu3dYU.html
@sysghost4 жыл бұрын
@@icestormfr Neat, but here they have no solder on em. Just bare traces.
@icestormfr4 жыл бұрын
@@sysghost ahh, ok, I thought you meant the traces seen at 8:37
@icestormfr4 жыл бұрын
@@sysghost ah, I see which one you meant. Hmmm, I know only two other reasons, but the traces don't look like that would apply here... (1. to improve heat conductivity to air, 2. acting as guard traces/rings, actively driven to the same potential as they are guarding, to get very high insulation/ultra low leakage from other parts of pbc, e.g. ultra low current/charge measurements => leakage flows over the PCB into these traces)
@TomStorey964 жыл бұрын
Less capacitance perhaps? I've seen that kind of thing in RF voodoo situations before.