@Sacto1654 Ай бұрын
It was still a monumental achievement considering the *ENORMOUS* difficulties Hawker and Rolls-Royce experienced developing the Pegasus engine and the P.1127 Kestrel airframe around the engine. Even more so considering the technology of the Tumanski engine was less advanced than the Rolls-Royce engine.
@rose415 Ай бұрын
Ty for sharing
@RaySmith1662 Ай бұрын
Good little video!!! 👍👍👍
@allgood6760 Ай бұрын
Thanks for this 👍✈️
@bergkongs Ай бұрын
Harrierski…..
@towgod7985 Ай бұрын
LMAO! Well said.
@isokabooks3758 Ай бұрын
Not to mention F35sky
@maxsothcott4484 27 күн бұрын
The first failure in a series of three failures! Yak 36, yak 38 and yak 141! Soviet era expensive disasters!
@rehanansari3581 Ай бұрын
Very informative
@charlestaylor253 Ай бұрын
Highly-flawed, subsonic prototype that never stood a chance at mass production...
@Sacto1654 24 күн бұрын
It was more a technology demonstrator than anything else. The fact it actually worked had to surprise a lot of Western observers considering the many issues Rolls-Royce had to overcome to get the Pegasus engine to work with the P.1127 Kestrel prototype.
@angusclark8330 19 күн бұрын
Theft.
@abominabelle 22 күн бұрын
Pretty similar set up to Harrier. Who was first?
@davidjames1063 24 күн бұрын
Equally as effective as F35 today. As in NOT VERY !😊
Aviation Highlights
Рет қаралды 64 М.
Not A Pound For Air To Ground
Рет қаралды 215 М.
Not A Pound For Air To Ground
Рет қаралды 255 М.
Aviation Republic
Рет қаралды 628 М.
Not A Pound For Air To Ground
Рет қаралды 174 М.