Hey! I saw you on Tom Scott plus. You're amazing

It's all in the beard.

5:30

Gotta say, that's not exactly the disposition I would want from a heart surgeon.

*Confessions* *Of* *A* *Buddist* *Yogi:* Time and Space do not exist in "actual" reality, they exist only in a Human reality. The concepts of Time and Space are mutually complementary, i.e. they only exist commensurate with each other, or, they only exist as they imply each other. Kind of like Left and Right, or, Up and Down, you can't have a Left without implying a Right, or, Up only exist relative to your understanding of Down. "There is nothing good nor bad, but thinking makes is so" (Bill Shakespeare, as Hamlet). When you understand that a Left means nothing unless you infer a Right which defines and describes it, but neither exists alone, then you will see that "Time" is simply the Human way of defining and describing the duration of "Space" relative to an observer, but in "Actual" reality, there is only "Here" and "Now". The "Past" does not exist; the "past" only exists as a memory, but that memory is always being experienced, or happening in the Now. The "future" is nothing more an expectation of what may happen, but when that expectation is realized, it will be happening in the "Now". Get Real, *BE* *HERE* *NOW!*

Right? So we're climbing out of the valley towards the heat death of the universe, but one day in the unimaginable far future we'll be climbing down into another valley of life once again? Big (bounce) if true

The universe is just a big Rubik's cube that keeps getting scrambled. It just seems highly unlikely that it'll ever get solved.

@@honorarymancunian7433 Isn't this akin to Sir |Roger Penrose's idea of Conformal cyclic cosmology?

@@honorarymancunian7433 Yeah, but the expansion of the universe seems to undermine that argument. The classic entropy demonstration of gas molecules in a box doesn't really translate to cosmic scales unless there are some enigmatic walls that the expanding, accelerating spacetime of the universe can bounce off of.

Think of a lava lamp. That is CCC. Or at least I understand it that way. Or is it the Big Bounce? Help... My brain is rusty. 🤯

I hope you aren't working on any critical infrastructure

@@lorenfulghum2393 or or any everyday objects for that matter lmao

@@lorenfulghum2393 Nah just nuclear power stations lolz

It IS very confusing when they talk about Specific Entropy as just Entropy... source of a LOT of confusion when Engineers talk to Physicists.

"Thermodynamics is a funny subject. The first time you go through it, you don't understand it at all. The second time you go through it, you think you understand it, except for one or two small points. The third time you go through it, you know you don't understand it, but by that time you are so used to it, it doesn't bother you any more. "

Yep. Pretty much zero chance of either. Unless one of us is in a collab or something.

Well, from your perspective, it may be an episode of the “past” but it is YOUR next episode. Her statement still stands.

But then the previous episode would be the next episode for you

That will be the next episode then.

Hey hey hey heeey

Watch my video on Boltzmann brains (or any video on it) to learn more about your questions :)

Roger Penrose CCC theory? When all is at maximum state, there is no time as everything is photonic, the universe is a singularity in a sense and expands again into an infinitely larger universe that conforms to the last one in cycles...or something (i am not the best at explaining this, but a flat infinite equilibrium with no reference frames, may as well be a dimensionless point in conformal geometry and progresses to the high entropy state)

Your point is good and seems inline with a pendulum-like state view of the Universe. Another way to look at that however is to revisit the old idea of big-crunch cosmology. We typically focused on gravity as the mechanism for cosmological reversal to a pre-big-bang state. Another option is that the big-crunch isn't induced by Relativistic physics but by QM effects. That is, if you consider the point just prior to the big bang to have a certain (very high) energy state then a ground state transition could occur that results in an emission, aka the big bang. That's a way oversimplified analogy to particle energy states but spontaneous emission is well established in QM so it's an easy if somewhat leaky analogy to start with. Obviously talking about cosmological scale QM isn't very natural with the typical formulation. If you think of extending the graph from the video over a cosmologic time scale with the big-bang on one end with the lowest entropy point and then assuming the universe were to evolve to a heat-death state, then the far end on the right could be a point of total thermal equilibrium. The pace of changes on the chart wouldn't be a constant, things are changing quickly in the beginning and then the dynamism of events essentially stops, or its at least moving as slow as possible at the other end. We can think of the flow of time as the rate of dynamism irrespective to a preferred direction. E.g. the pace that time flows is the rate of changes in the system relative to some minimum value (a cosmological tick, obviously ignoring Relativity). With lot's of changes, time is moving fast, with few changes relative to some fixed slowest process then time is moving slowly. In one sense time slows down to the point that spontaneous quantum events are the only remaining dynamics as kinematics are all in equilibrium. In that state even the extremely long timelines for electron and proton decay are now relevant. This is obviously beyond the area of what we understand and is now squarely in the field of speculation. Continuing to speculate and assuming the universe ends up with a state where particles have all spontaneously decayed into photon's or some other similar boson state then every particle in the universe is at complete thermal equilibrium and is entirely composed of bosons. That would put the entire universe into a Bose-Einstein condensate where most if not all of the Boson's are entangled. The comparison between the pre-big bang state and the heat-death state have some interesting questions. What is the difference in the total energy states from the beginning of the universe and the end? Meaning is the total energy of the systems in the two states the same? Conservation of energy would imply that the total energy in the two states should be the same. If the two states have the same total energy where is that energy bound? Say it's not the same, then we can assign the value |1> to the pre-big-bang state and |0> to the heat-death state. If all of the energy in the universe for either the beginning or the end is evenly distributed and all of the particle(s) are in the same energy level, is there a lower ground state? In the beginning we pre-supposed there was via our extremely leaky analogy. In the case of the universe as a Bose-Einstein condensate, if the universe is in equilibrium (temperature is zero) is there a lower ground state to transition into? If there is a lower energy state then what would happen to the entangled Bose-Einstein condensate if one of the Boson's were to decay to an even lower energy state? If the heat-death universe has no lower ground-state where did the energy get bound from the transition from |1> at the beginning to |0> at the end. If the energy at the end is bound somewhere else, can the heat-death universe in the Bose-Einstein condensate state transition to |1> via a QM absorption? I don't have any answers, just questions. My instinct on this is that the energy isn't really |1> or |0> but possibly some possibility like |1>,|0> and |0>,|1> or even more combinatoins. What I mean is in the pre-big-bang all of the energy is bound in one state and so the big-bang is a transition from the |1>,|0> towards the |0>,|1> state. The question on if the mechanism can reset itself is difficult obviously, though my bias is pulling me towards probably.

@@upandatom Pardon my tangent, but the Boltzmann brain argument defeats itself: a hypothetical brain spawning randomly into existence is far, far more likely to spawn with an incorrect belief of the nature of the universe than to spawn with the correct one. By the boltzmann logic, we (as boltzmann believers) must therefore consider ourselves as almost certainly part of the incorrect class, and therefore rule out boltzmann brains.

@@upandatom How would a wormhole to the past work if time is an emergent property?

@SPARKY If you can't explain it simply, you doesn't really understand it. I think R8chard Feynman said something like that. Anyway. If you can explain it comprehensively, then you know it. I guess that's why Jade do these videos!

​@@larsnystrom6698 It's obvious though because any knowledagble person would know the way they understood the topic on the first place but a good teacher or explainer would try to use their methods of whatever they used to understand each topics to the listeners/students. This has been an intuitive process because the human mind works that way. But Feynman was surely the first person to popularise this concept. His learning techniques are still one of the greatest approach in underestanding anything.

I have degrees in maths and engineering, and I find Jade’s videos is amazing too. She is able to choose and break down a topic, and communicate it so well for everyone without dumbing it down at all.

There is also a 4th law of thermodynamics, watch the spinning dancer:- kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i8d4artyrbWsqXk.html Bistability implies duality! Clockwise is dual to anti-clockwise. Left brain dominance is dual to right brain dominance. Master (Lordship) is dual to slave (Bondsman) -- the time dependent Hegelian dialectic. Brain dominance is visual proof of the Hegelian dialectic at work, problem, reaction, solution. The Hegelian (Fichte's) dialectic is dual if it is dependent & independent of time (both at the same time):- Thesis (action, problem) is dual to anti-thesis (reaction) creates the converging thesis or synthesis (solution) -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton (the duality of force or all forces are dual). Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Duality creates reality! The Necker cube is a good example of duality. From a converging, convex or syntropic perspective everything looks divergent, concave or entropic -- the 2nd law of thermodynamics! All observers have a syntropic perspective. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Time symmetry is dual to time asymmetry -- time duality. Space symmetry is dual to space asymmetry -- space duality. Time duality is dual to space duality. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. The Big Bang is a Janus hole/point (two faces = duality) -- Julian Barbour physicist. Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic. Null Homotopic is dual to non null homotopic -- Duality.

@@hyperduality2838 your comments, my anti-your comments. duel that!

@@hyperduality2838 bruh

I noticed that too. How does moving particles the other way cause time to go backwards? It shouldnt, unless Im missing something. Also, note that even in the graph showing increasing and decreasing entropy, the axis it happens on is the time axis, and always in the same direction. I think theres a conflating of ideas between direction of time and arrangement of particles. I also think that even if you were in a frame of reference going backwards in time, you would still perceive it as forward in time for yourself. On a slightly crazier note, dosent it seem like were going backwards through time? We see the past, but not the future, although the future is forward, therefore were walking backwards.

@@jasonlough6640 You're not missing something. Time does not go backwards inside your refrigerator despite entropy decreasing locally. The second law of thermodynamics is not broken because while entropy is decreasing inside the refrigerator, the refrigerator is not a closed system. The back of your refrigerator still ratiates heat into the environment and so entropy increases overall. But if entropy direction pointed time direction, the inside of your refrigerator should go backwards in time and it clearly doesn't. The point of the graph and the link between entropy and time direction is the idea that time should be symmetrical. If you cut out the beginning of the graph, it doesn't matter which way you point the time axis, the graph will look indistinguishable. The problem is that entropy increasing breaks time symmetry so because of entropy, time direction is distinguishable. But that's it. Entropy does not make time move forward, entropy only makes time direction distinguishable. That's why it's important not to fall into misconceptions. One solution to the problem shown by the video is that the big bang was the lowest point in entropy and that if you go back further in time, entropy increases backwards as well. It is possible that the universe started at the big bang but branched out into two opposite directions. 2nd law of thermodynamics is not broken before the big bang if the second branch of the universe ticks time in opposite direction. If we saw the dwellers of that branch of the universe, we would perceive them as moving back in time. But for those dwellers, time would move normally and they would perceive us as moving backwards in time. So yes, like you said, regardless of what arbitrary direction time moves, from our point of view, it moves forward.

@@pasijutaulietuviuesas9174 Yes, but… Would we see people getting younger turning into babies and then into infants and then going back into the womb and then becoming an individual egg and an individual sperm cell? I mean I suppose if that’s how it occurred in our universe we were just accept it and find a way to explain it. And the other hand in the universe which was mirror “backwards“ time-Symmetrical to ours the mechanisms of life and death might operate in a completely different fashion.

@@JohnnyArtPavlou I can't imagine how the 'other' universe would form, so I can't say people would turn into babies and then go into wombs, but what we would observe is a trend towards all entropy decreasing and all matter and energy would trend towards a single point, towards the big bang, their time moving backwards. Whereas we see our universe in the opposite direction, trending away from the big bang and increasing entropy. But the dwellers of the 'other' universe would still see themselves as moving forward in time, they would actually see us going backwards in time. Now, obviously, "seeing" is a bit of a cheat because there would be no actual physical way to observe the other side of the universe. No information could pass between the two sides of the big bang. All we could know is that if such an opposite side of the universe would exist, it would exist reversed in our timeline. But just like different versions of the multiverse theory, this is just another version of speculative universes outside of our own.

@@micahmeneyerji You can. Because you have a direction of time yourself that you can compare to.

the law of large numbers is itself just the fact that an infinite number of random variables between let's say -1 and 1 must have its mean equivalent to the range's mean = 0. This is the definition of the simplest possible random variable.

@@anywallsocket I've never heard ot described like that. I've already heard it described along the lines of "as the number of trials of some experiment approaches infinity, the proportions of each outcome will approach the theoretical probabilities." e.g. If you roll only a few times, it wouldn't be that weird to get, say a 3 each time. But if you keep rolling the die more and more times, the proportion of times each number is rolled should get closer and closer to 1/6. Hmm. Now that I've typed that out, I realize that actually is very similar to how random variables are usually defined. It's been a bit since I've actually used the term "random variable". I'm a stats tutor, hence my familiarity with probability, but I can't remember the last time a student asked me about random variables. Lots of people ask me about the basics of what probability is though.

Speed of time = abs(d entropy / dt) ? ...? Idk. I don't know what t is.

I always liked Dr. Carroll's explanation until I realized that it seems very unlikely we could have any awareness of the overall state of entropy in the universe. I'm beginning to wonder if the explanation of time's arrow has anything at all to do with entropy.

@@notgary1111 -- Time only matters to people who have the ability to think about time. Rocks don't care. Chemical reactions don't care. None of them understand "before" or "after". So, in that sense, time only exists as a construct of a mind that is capable of considering the difference between past and future. And since your memory is ALSO formed via physical processes, processes which if flipped would be undoing your memory, then you can only ever experience these processes in one direction. But secondly, your experience of time doesn't depend on your knowledge of the entire universe, just on your knowledge of what you are capable of perceiving at any given moment. The overall state of entropy in the universe doesn't matter to the person making observations, in other words. If I see an egg splattered on the floor suddenly put itself together inside a shell which then unbreaks, then I'm going to need to come up with an explanation for it. However, I strongly suspect that any part of the universe where a broken egg puts itself back together probably exists in the same state where an observer watching it happen is going to forget that the egg was ever broken "before" since whatever energy is needed to flip all of those physical forces is probably going to be flipping the physical forces recording memories too, such that the person who experience it in this framework is going to be "forgetting" instead of "remembering" things.

There is also a 4th law of thermodynamics, watch the spinning dancer:- kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i8d4artyrbWsqXk.html Bistability implies duality! Clockwise is dual to anti-clockwise. Left brain dominance is dual to right brain dominance. Master (Lordship) is dual to slave (Bondsman) -- the time dependent Hegelian dialectic. Brain dominance is visual proof of the Hegelian dialectic at work, problem, reaction, solution. The Hegelian (Fichte's) dialectic is dual if it is dependent & independent of time (both at the same time):- Thesis (action, problem) is dual to anti-thesis (reaction) creates the converging thesis or synthesis (solution) -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton (the duality of force or all forces are dual). Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Duality creates reality! The Necker cube is a good example of duality. From a converging, convex or syntropic perspective everything looks divergent, concave or entropic -- the 2nd law of thermodynamics! All observers have a syntropic perspective. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Time symmetry is dual to time asymmetry -- time duality. Space symmetry is dual to space asymmetry -- space duality. Time duality is dual to space duality. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. The Big Bang is a Janus hole/point (two faces = duality) -- Julian Barbour physicist. Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic. Null Homotopic is dual to non null homotopic -- Duality.

@@peterpike yeah so its kind of the same with the conundrum "if a tree falls in the forest does it make a sound"? ...BTW this question was featured in this channel some time ago... which leads me to my point, something about the Copenhagen interpretation .. so is there a possiblity that because,us, humans, are able to measure time has made all the difference why we experience increase in entropy with time rather than the opposite? But, of course, were nonexistent during Bigbang so who was culprit? GOD? .. would want to hear your thoughts about these questions ...I dont even know if these questions are valid.... lol...

This woman is incredible: beauty never goes with intelligence, never. I see these two things in this woman. It's not supposed to happen. What is going on?

@@seanleith5312 I don't know what you think you were doing here, or if you thought I was going to agree with you ,but this comment is disgusting and reeks of misogyny. Don't say shit like this.

@@harperthejay misogyny is hatred against women in general Beauty and intelligence not going together first of all has little to with women in particular, it can be applied to men just by changing beauty to handsomeness. Even that shouldn't be strictly needed but its unusual to use beauty in the context of males. Secondly, it's clearly not saying that women are on avg less or more intelligent or anything like that, just that for any one individual it's either of the two. So the statement is really just an expression of a statistical truth, assuming a high enough barrier for what we consider beautiful and intelligent, say the upper 1/10th of the entire population for each trait. Then, the probability for someone to be in top 1/10 for both would be 1/100. Ofcourse it's not really never, but that was just hyperbole If you're wondering why i even bothered wasting my good 3-5 mins writing this comment, its because I'm tired of people labelling everything misogynistic without actually giving any thought to if that even makes sense

@@seanleith5312 There are many forms of intelligence and beauty, and about as many ways to find those in a woman if you're actually looking for them.

@@TimJBucci I am aware of that. I just don't see beauty and intelligence that often. Do you?

There is also a 4th law of thermodynamics, watch the spinning dancer:- kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i8d4artyrbWsqXk.html Bistability implies duality! Clockwise is dual to anti-clockwise. Left brain dominance is dual to right brain dominance. Master (Lordship) is dual to slave (Bondsman) -- the time dependent Hegelian dialectic. Brain dominance is visual proof of the Hegelian dialectic at work, problem, reaction, solution. The Hegelian (Fichte's) dialectic is dual if it is dependent & independent of time (both at the same time):- Thesis (action, problem) is dual to anti-thesis (reaction) creates the converging thesis or synthesis (solution) -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton (the duality of force or all forces are dual). Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Duality creates reality! The Necker cube is a good example of duality. From a converging, convex or syntropic perspective everything looks divergent, concave or entropic -- the 2nd law of thermodynamics! All observers have a syntropic perspective. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Time symmetry is dual to time asymmetry -- time duality. Space symmetry is dual to space asymmetry -- space duality. Time duality is dual to space duality. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. The Big Bang is a Janus hole/point (two faces = duality) -- Julian Barbour physicist. Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic. Null Homotopic is dual to non null homotopic -- Duality.

If the future would have lower entropy instead, we would call it the past. The definition of a low-entropy state (=grouping of microstates) is arbitrary. Every state is special. Quantum mechanics time evolution is reversible. Quantum computers are computers, where the state does not change entropy during the computation. There is no reason, why the past (or the time with lower entropy) should be 'more' fixed than the future (time with higher entropy). The people making probabilistic arguments about the past, and saying that a low-entropy state is so improbable (if a state is chosen at random) are basically (if one applies their thinking) also saying that it is 1:(10^high power) more likely that all humans are manipulated than that our research and logic and rememberance of our past and experience of the present or any deduction of physics law or mathematics is true. So it is an argument, which denies its own logic.

Actually, the video stated that time having a direction is an emergen property, not time itself. I'm not saying that time isn't an emergent property, but this wasn't what the video was about.

@@Zuzezno yes you're right about that. Thanks for pointing it out.

Welcome!!!!!

@@upandatom Hey Jade. I hope you can respond to my question about quantum entanglement when you can. Thanks very much .

@@upandatom @Up and Atom you are such a living walking piece of garbage I can't believe you just took this video and spun it into anti Big bang propaganda BS! One of the biggest problems with third dimensional existence is the fact that we think that whatever we can see we can measure accurately... This is completely untrue! If we sent out a enormous amount of spaceships that we could actually accurately track the distance in which they have traveled from this Earth and we mapped our entire galaxy it would be nothing but a tiny little speck compared to the entire universe of everything we can see. Accelerating expansion of the universe pass the speed of light and constantly picking up speed is an illusion caused by dark matter... Contrary to popular belief dark matter does interfere with regular matter. I think it's pretty audacious of the scientific community to say that dark matter has no interaction with regular matter when they haven't even identified what dark matter is comprised of and have never even found a dark matter particle!!! Everything bust forth from the singularity the problem is science wants to move itself away from the singularity because it realizes that the singularity is "God". Ultimately everything is one. Dark matter is the counter action force to the expansion of the universe... Let's say that dark matter is comprised of hooks instead of strings. This is the reason why we cannot view a dark matter particle and I've never found one because we are composed of strings these hooks can rip off tiny fractions of those strings of all material that pass through it and convert it into hooks. Light has mass this is the reason why I like cannot escape a black hole it is mass in motion when it comes to a resting point it no longer contains mass and it no longer exists. Light sheds its mass to maintain its velocity just like everything else. The reason why light cannot escape a black hole is because guess what it contains Mass anything that contains volume contains Mass... You cannot give something volume without giving it Mass! If you take a two-dimensional plane and you put it in any direction in any position near a black hole wherever you want to put it it will have absolutely zero interaction with a black hole! Do you know why because guess what in the second dimension there is absolutely no mass and therefore black hole cannot have any interaction with that two-dimensional plane! I'm not disagreeing with you on the fact that time can reverse and roll backwards but to think that anything ever started from anything other than a singularity is just insanity! This anti Big bang mindset is totally insane! Also this accelerating expansion of the universe pass the speed of light mindset is equally insane! And I completely understand what the idiot say about how since it is expanding into nothing it can pick up speed past the speed of light but that's just total garbage! Dark matter is absorbing bits and pieces of all energy that pass through it it is surrounding our entire solar system our entire galaxy and is constantly growing by absorbing bits and pieces of energy that pass through it ripping off strings fractions of a penny of mass and slowly increasing it's density... This is happening equally as this does happen and dark matter increases its density it creates an illusion of accelerating expansion of the universe past the speed of light! It is far more logical and far more reasonable to say this than to say any of the BS that people spout about anti Big bang! Sorry but I just couldn't let you get away with it especially when you leave it on a cliffhanger like that and obviously really don't know anything... There's a reason why your video got pushed to me by the KZfaq algorithm because it's nothing but BS propaganda anti Big bang anti-singularity anti-god BS crap! Then again none of us are immortal beings that have existed from the very beginning of time and will exist to the very end of time so none of us can experience real objective truth and objective truth does not exist here in the third dimension... So guess what I'm wrong and you are wrong and every single person here will be wrong and it is completely pointless to even try to figure anything out because guess what they will be wrong too!!!!!

The only problem is that she has fallen into a trap of just accepting some ideas such as the "big bang" as fact and is building a straw house on a foundation of shifting sand. Most scientists are now either rejecting the big bang or at least questioning the theory in response to the fact that the outer extents of our observable universe are accelerating away from us and are travelling faster than the speed of light. A common theory recently was the "big crunch" (it started a few decades ago and gained acceptance over time just like the big bang theory did before that), might I mention that the big crunch disregarded the laws of thermodynamics, and now is totally rejected by almost all scientists as just a weird idea that doesn't hold water.

@@pb6801 yes yes it's actually sky daddy. run along now.

It's probably the 5th dimension Did I answer in terms of probability to a question about probability? 🤔

@@lvmbk3755 Probably

the price at which one would buy or sell a bet that pays 1 unit of utility if event E occurs and pays 0 units of utility if event E doesn't occur.

Consider that the state of particles and energy in your mind also follows these laws, so you do not experience the reversal because your makeup and memories are part of the system.

@@davidpetersonharvey Precisely!

If we are already being visited by "us" in the future. These "us" beings with human like qualities have achieved this coveted state of equilibrium to be able to traverse the sea of time in both directions. They can go either way.

You are observing your thought process time is psychic.

@@davidpetersonharvey true! If you reversed the speed of every snooker ball exactly soon after the initial break, they would not return to to form a triangle and push the white out back along the table. Because some energy has been lost as sound making air molecules, your eardrum and cells in your brain vibrate forming a memory.for time to reverse you would have to lose that memory in a exact reverse procedure

And so catchy!

Thank YOU for watching :)))

There is also a 4th law of thermodynamics, watch the spinning dancer:- kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i8d4artyrbWsqXk.html Bistability implies duality! Clockwise is dual to anti-clockwise. Left brain dominance is dual to right brain dominance. Master (Lordship) is dual to slave (Bondsman) -- the time dependent Hegelian dialectic. Brain dominance is visual proof of the Hegelian dialectic at work, problem, reaction, solution. The Hegelian (Fichte's) dialectic is dual if it is dependent & independent of time (both at the same time):- Thesis (action, problem) is dual to anti-thesis (reaction) creates the converging thesis or synthesis (solution) -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton (the duality of force or all forces are dual). Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Duality creates reality! The Necker cube is a good example of duality. From a converging, convex or syntropic perspective everything looks divergent, concave or entropic -- the 2nd law of thermodynamics! All observers have a syntropic perspective. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Time symmetry is dual to time asymmetry -- time duality. Space symmetry is dual to space asymmetry -- space duality. Time duality is dual to space duality. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. The Big Bang is a Janus hole/point (two faces = duality) -- Julian Barbour physicist. Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic. Null Homotopic is dual to non null homotopic -- Duality.

@@upandatom @Up and Atom you are such a living walking piece of garbage I can't believe you just took this video and spun it into anti Big bang propaganda BS! One of the biggest problems with third dimensional existence is the fact that we think that whatever we can see we can measure accurately... This is completely untrue! If we sent out a enormous amount of spaceships that we could actually accurately track the distance in which they have traveled from this Earth and we mapped our entire galaxy it would be nothing but a tiny little speck compared to the entire universe of everything we can see. Accelerating expansion of the universe pass the speed of light and constantly picking up speed is an illusion caused by dark matter... Contrary to popular belief dark matter does interfere with regular matter. I think it's pretty audacious of the scientific community to say that dark matter has no interaction with regular matter when they haven't even identified what dark matter is comprised of and have never even found a dark matter particle!!! Everything bust forth from the singularity the problem is science wants to move itself away from the singularity because it realizes that the singularity is "God". Ultimately everything is one. Dark matter is the counter action force to the expansion of the universe... Let's say that dark matter is comprised of hooks instead of strings. This is the reason why we cannot view a dark matter particle and I've never found one because we are composed of strings these hooks can rip off tiny fractions of those strings of all material that pass through it and convert it into hooks. Light has mass this is the reason why I like cannot escape a black hole it is mass in motion when it comes to a resting point it no longer contains mass and it no longer exists. Light sheds its mass to maintain its velocity just like everything else. The reason why light cannot escape a black hole is because guess what it contains Mass anything that contains volume contains Mass... You cannot give something volume without giving it Mass! If you take a two-dimensional plane and you put it in any direction in any position near a black hole wherever you want to put it it will have absolutely zero interaction with a black hole! Do you know why because guess what in the second dimension there is absolutely no mass and therefore black hole cannot have any interaction with that two-dimensional plane! I'm not disagreeing with you on the fact that time can reverse and roll backwards but to think that anything ever started from anything other than a singularity is just insanity! This anti Big bang mindset is totally insane! Also this accelerating expansion of the universe pass the speed of light mindset is equally insane! And I completely understand what the idiot say about how since it is expanding into nothing it can pick up speed past the speed of light but that's just total garbage! Dark matter is absorbing bits and pieces of all energy that pass through it it is surrounding our entire solar system our entire galaxy and is constantly growing by absorbing bits and pieces of energy that pass through it ripping off strings fractions of a penny of mass and slowly increasing it's density... This is happening equally as this does happen and dark matter increases its density it creates an illusion of accelerating expansion of the universe past the speed of light! It is far more logical and far more reasonable to say this than to say any of the BS that people spout about anti Big bang! Sorry but I just couldn't let you get away with it especially when you leave it on a cliffhanger like that and obviously really don't know anything... There's a reason why your video got pushed to me by the KZfaq algorithm because it's nothing but BS propaganda anti Big bang anti-singularity anti-god BS crap! Then again none of us are immortal beings that have existed from the very beginning of time and will exist to the very end of time so none of us can experience real objective truth and objective truth does not exist here in the third dimension... So guess what I'm wrong and you are wrong and every single person here will be wrong and it is completely pointless to even try to figure anything out because guess what they will be wrong too!!!

There is also a 4th law of thermodynamics, watch the spinning dancer:- kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i8d4artyrbWsqXk.html Bistability implies duality! Clockwise is dual to anti-clockwise. Left brain dominance is dual to right brain dominance. Master (Lordship) is dual to slave (Bondsman) -- the time dependent Hegelian dialectic. Brain dominance is visual proof of the Hegelian dialectic at work, problem, reaction, solution. The Hegelian (Fichte's) dialectic is dual if it is dependent & independent of time (both at the same time):- Thesis (action, problem) is dual to anti-thesis (reaction) creates the converging thesis or synthesis (solution) -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton (the duality of force or all forces are dual). Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Duality creates reality! The Necker cube is a good example of duality. From a converging, convex or syntropic perspective everything looks divergent, concave or entropic -- the 2nd law of thermodynamics! All observers have a syntropic perspective. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Time symmetry is dual to time asymmetry -- time duality. Space symmetry is dual to space asymmetry -- space duality. Time duality is dual to space duality. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. The Big Bang is a Janus hole/point (two faces = duality) -- Julian Barbour physicist. Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic. Null Homotopic is dual to non null homotopic -- Duality.

There is also a 4th law of thermodynamics, watch the spinning dancer:- kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i8d4artyrbWsqXk.html Bistability implies duality! Clockwise is dual to anti-clockwise. Left brain dominance is dual to right brain dominance. Master (Lordship) is dual to slave (Bondsman) -- the time dependent Hegelian dialectic. Brain dominance is visual proof of the Hegelian dialectic at work, problem, reaction, solution. The Hegelian (Fichte's) dialectic is dual if it is dependent & independent of time (both at the same time):- Thesis (action, problem) is dual to anti-thesis (reaction) creates the converging thesis or synthesis (solution) -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton (the duality of force or all forces are dual). Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Duality creates reality! The Necker cube is a good example of duality. From a converging, convex or syntropic perspective everything looks divergent, concave or entropic -- the 2nd law of thermodynamics! All observers have a syntropic perspective. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Time symmetry is dual to time asymmetry -- time duality. Space symmetry is dual to space asymmetry -- space duality. Time duality is dual to space duality. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. The Big Bang is a Janus hole/point (two faces = duality) -- Julian Barbour physicist. Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic. Null Homotopic is dual to non null homotopic -- Duality.

That sounds like a bounce.

How do we know if it's extreme at all?

How did your students cope with the revelation that a system in equilibrium can spontaneously fall out of equilibrium?

Forward time primarily, amirite?

Thanks I spent 3 months on it :)

@@upandatom omg 3 months But it's worth it

@@upandatom So it'd take three months in the other direction to destroy this video.

@@vigilantcosmicpenguin8721 lmao

Thank you! Hmm I don’t know there are already so many great videos about fermi’s paradox!

@@upandatom well, not enough include the The Lucky/Rare Earth Hypothesis. And if we are so unique maybe we should really be taking better care of our environment (I initially wrote planet, but the planet will be fine). But also important to point out: the more conditions we add to the Rare Earth Equation, the more we limit our view to 'life like our own' instead of life in general. Something else to consider: are you trying to educate your audience (your current subscribers) or are you trying to grow your audience ? Because if it's the first then it doesn't matter if other videos already exists just the probability of them having already seen it

indeed. perhaps the global entropy of the greater universe is like the Weierstrass function, always increasing or decreasing, depending on your level of zoom.

Bear in mind that when you say 'a dip in entropy' on that scale, you are describing time running backwards for our entire universe for its entire 15-odd billion year lifespan so precisely that every single particle in it just happen to all end up at a single point in spacetime. I think you could safely argue that it's almost infinitely more likely for countless universes to simply pop out of the vacuum state by pure chance than for an existing one to 'reset' itself by chance in this manner - unless we can posit a more realistic mechanism for it to do so.

Think about what it would look like to live in a universe during such a period of statistically unlikely anti-entropy. The rules of physics and math would be no different from ours, and their derivations would tell them that entropy should increase - but against all possible chance, nothing would behave as it should. That world would seem utterly magical, with vases unbreaking, animals undying, people being unborn - not because the laws of physics say it should happen, but because pure chance must generate such thermodynanically unlikely miracles one after another for BILLIONS OF YEARS on end to get back to that ultra low entropy state. In our universe any one of these events would be so unlikely as to have almost no realistic probability of happening even once before every star in our universe undergoes complete baryon decay.

@@Vastin your understanding is weak but your imagination is strong

@@anywallsocket Well, go ahead and describe an extended period of steadily reducing entropy in our universe then. I'm all ears.

There is also a 4th law of thermodynamics, watch the spinning dancer:- kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i8d4artyrbWsqXk.html Bistability implies duality! Clockwise is dual to anti-clockwise. Left brain dominance is dual to right brain dominance. Master (Lordship) is dual to slave (Bondsman) -- the time dependent Hegelian dialectic. Brain dominance is visual proof of the Hegelian dialectic at work, problem, reaction, solution. The Hegelian (Fichte's) dialectic is dual if it is dependent & independent of time (both at the same time):- Thesis (action, problem) is dual to anti-thesis (reaction) creates the converging thesis or synthesis (solution) -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton (the duality of force or all forces are dual). Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Duality creates reality! The Necker cube is a good example of duality. From a converging, convex or syntropic perspective everything looks divergent, concave or entropic -- the 2nd law of thermodynamics! All observers have a syntropic perspective. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Time symmetry is dual to time asymmetry -- time duality. Space symmetry is dual to space asymmetry -- space duality. Time duality is dual to space duality. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. The Big Bang is a Janus hole/point (two faces = duality) -- Julian Barbour physicist. Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic. Null Homotopic is dual to non null homotopic -- Duality.

“Time may not exist” Does anyone knows a way to prove it does exist? Because it doesn’t seam necessary indeed I can say “I’ll arrive in 24h” It only means Earth is gonna round around itself once It’s actually space based

@@gabrieltomaz6034 Time existe! Movement is a changing of states. Your "Earth round itself once" is measured in other axis which register that space changed states: time axis. dx=v.dt. Like the videos of thesseract, using one (unproved) Space time of 5 dimensions, where the 4d space object change states measured at more one time dimension.

@@gabrieltomaz6034 I also cannot justify the existence of time. It is a useful calculation of kinetic energy's effect on a mass.

@@micahmeneyerji hours definition are exact by a multiple of the exact definition of second by the ceasium 133 Atom transition. But to be coherent with rotation of Earth the difference in seconds from 24 is counted and in some point adjusted, as the yearly translation time is adjusted every 4 years. So the reference hours institutions know at each instant the difference to a perfect 24h day and perfect 365 days year.

Okay, that's a fascinating idea. If a hypothetical being from the Q continuum rearranged all particles to a previous state, say, one year ago, including all photons, unfusing nucleii in stars, pulling all absorbed photons out of particles and sending all emitted photons back into particles, resetting all particles positions and every states, which resets all chemistry including resetting all brains back to previous configurations (meaning most recent stored memories are from one year ago), technically the universe would be in March 2022 but in the state of March 2021. So is that in any way distinguishable from the ACTUAL 2021, or is the process of rearranging the particles indistinguishable from actual time travel? Though the rearranging would probably have to be universe-wide at the same time, right? Otherwise if the Q being went planet by planet or galaxy by galaxy, new light from Star A would fall on the Planet B while Planet B is being rearranged, and now rearranging Star A means having more undo-work to do on affected Planet B, so Q would be stuck in a never-ending task running around and re-tweaking things that keep affecting each other. Anyway, fascinating.

@@kenten wow, nice answer. It's like something impossible from our perspective. From that Q being's perspective, it can be something like resetting the computer game to some previous state (every bit in that computer's memory). Or what if we have done it more locally, on macroscopic scale? Let's say that you live in a cave and never go out. You have few things in there (bed, cup, watch...). You go to sleep and I enter the cave, arrange everything in the cave the way it was let's say two days ago. An I leave. You wake up and probably would feel like some time traveller who travelled two days backward in time (keeping your memories and also aging normally)

All particles of mass have a corresponding wave-length, and so act like clocks - which are themselves irreversible. Indeed, it's thought that even elementary particle will all eventually decay. To understand this consider the fact that no matter how efficient you think your 're-arranging', it will never be 100% efficient, and therefore you will waste heat trying to fix things, and more heat trying to fix the heat you wasted, etc., like trying to sweep the last bit of dust into the dustpan -- it's impossible.

@@kenten WE would never know that that had happened!

@@kenten Dude, if there are any hard sci-fi authors reading this, this HAS to be the premise for a time travel story.

Just figuring this out myself, but does the heat/energy not reverse as well? If you added energy to the particles at the time of collision, they could leave at a faster rate than they arrived. Jade's ball example is very similar. In forward time, energy was released to propel the ball and then energy was absorbed when caught. In reverse time, the energy that had been absorbed is now released to throw the ball in reverse time.

Great thought. I think that the video was a simplification of the theory. I think the point is that for any position of the particles, there exists a set of velocity vectors that will bring them all back together into a lattice. (the initial conditions change depending upon what factors you are considering (heat/sound/gravity/drag), but there is always a solution set that will work, actually there are probably an infinite number of solution sets) Anyway, I don't know why that would make me believe that time can go backwards.

It doesn't make sense. Particle can't lose heat energy 'caus it is the particle themselves who posses heat in bigger system. colliding particle lead to two thing : if their velocity is hight enough they'll merge into bigger particle by losing neutrino and other particle OR have an elastic shock. in both way it's possible that things can happen in reverse but quasi improbable. Due to the stable statesment of the universe that everything tend to have lower energy. The universe can't gain or lose energy he is stable finite with finite energy.

Not sure it's relevant but... I'm really astonished that people discuss time reversibility. Forwards or backwards, the particles will always lose energy by colliding. Reversibility does not work with time (only time invariance, different topic). Everything flows in one direction, with time. I would say, the basis for this is causality. Describing colliding backwards in time is a nice one. Time reversibility is a childish star trek myth. This is what entropy is about, what second law of thermodynamics is about and what time is about. AND: what causality is about, you cannot reverse CAUSE and EFFECT. First cause, after some TIME, we have the effect. Also existence and energy preservation is dependant on time. Also, there are no time wormholes, this is nonsense, only space wormholes. No going back in time, and no "faster than light" speed of particles. This all should flow from the current physics. Or am I missing something?

@@eugenkeller that’s what i think too

There is also a 4th law of thermodynamics, watch the spinning dancer:- kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i8d4artyrbWsqXk.html Bistability implies duality! Clockwise is dual to anti-clockwise. Left brain dominance is dual to right brain dominance. Master (Lordship) is dual to slave (Bondsman) -- the time dependent Hegelian dialectic. Brain dominance is visual proof of the Hegelian dialectic at work, problem, reaction, solution. The Hegelian (Fichte's) dialectic is dual if it is dependent & independent of time (both at the same time):- Thesis (action, problem) is dual to anti-thesis (reaction) creates the converging thesis or synthesis (solution) -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton (the duality of force or all forces are dual). Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Duality creates reality! The Necker cube is a good example of duality. From a converging, convex or syntropic perspective everything looks divergent, concave or entropic -- the 2nd law of thermodynamics! All observers have a syntropic perspective. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Time symmetry is dual to time asymmetry -- time duality. Space symmetry is dual to space asymmetry -- space duality. Time duality is dual to space duality. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. The Big Bang is a Janus hole/point (two faces = duality) -- Julian Barbour physicist. Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic. Null Homotopic is dual to non null homotopic -- Duality.

Me toooo ❣️

Time is really a fascinating creature

Ah! Me too anxiously waiting for the video

Because gravity isn't the only effect at play, in fact it's the effect that contributes to entropy decrease. There is a negative pressure effect in the universe, currently coined dark energy which little is understood about, that drives mass distribution and therefore mass distribution towards a diffuse state, so opposite of what gravity tends to do. The disbalance in the strength and magnitude of the way these effects can affect the system dictates towards which state the system is heading towards on the grand universe scale.

Are our cells affected by gravity or just our bodies? Meaning they flow all around without a need for gravity. And inside cells atoms and protons etc do the same thing. It's the observable plane we are on.

@@ThatCrazyKid0007 Objects trapped in a gravity field can be consider as pocket of trapped entropy, like water trapped in a cup. However give enough energy from an external force can release trapped entropy. For instance if another large mass traveling very fast hits the earth it can scatter matter out of the earths gravity well. Although the matter trapped on earth still undergoes entropy (for instance chemical reactions: burning fuel). The Earth does constantly gain energy from the sun (external source), to offset energy losses.

Physics girl is way more fuckable.

OMG,you made my day. Whenever I watch a video and don't understand something, I feel like a dumbass😂 Sometimes I try to make myself understand that I'm only in 12th grade,It's okay if i don't understand something of higher level... Now knowing that others also don't understand something despite having degrees, made me feel good😂😂

Time does not flow backwards. Time travel is impossible. God shall never permit it.

you would like to see her ball skills i think?

Well... A second is not always a second to being with. That is what that fellow Einstein figured out. Though, this is a dumb way to dodge your question. Since whole length of time can contract and lengthen, there is still an idea of a length of time. If all things are being equal, a second is as long here as any other place. Relative to where I am, a second is always a second. It does not speed up or slow down locally. I am not sure if I am equipped to explain why this is. But I will try. And I will bring it back to those symmetries mentioned before. The quantiles of the system is preserved. That includes the motions. So even if something would start to change faster, you would have to trade it off with something else. Preserving the whole symmetry of the system. Again, I am not sure if this helps at all to explain it. Edit: Try to think of it like you did not have time at all in your model of the universe. Just states that changes continuous, but is always in symmetric.

Same as space, what defines the amount is what can happen/be in between.

Well - it isn't? Thanks to relativity, a second gets shorter when you go into orbit, and it gets longer when you hang out too close to a black hole. In terms of perception, time can also vary significantly. Many species perceive time at different rates. A bird that evolves to fly through dense forests at high speeds should perceive the world at a significantly different 'frame rate' than we do, simplifying their view of the world but also slowing it down so they can make decisions fast enough to not go splat. Even a pro-sports-ball player most likely sees the world at a very slightly slower rate than does the average person, and there are a few drugs that can more dramatically change your perception of time (and other things...) As for the objective measurement of time, I think the core value there is Plank Time, which is the theoretical shortest amount of time over which any change at all can happen - but even plank time is affected by relativity, so there is no perfectly fixed unit of time.

I’m glad it finally clicked! Unfortunately I don’t at this time

@@upandatom thank you so so much and it is fine that you do not at the moment have the explanation, I assume you must be occupied with other important things. Keep it up! :>

There is also a 4th law of thermodynamics, watch the spinning dancer:- kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i8d4artyrbWsqXk.html Bistability implies duality! Clockwise is dual to anti-clockwise. Left brain dominance is dual to right brain dominance. Master (Lordship) is dual to slave (Bondsman) -- the time dependent Hegelian dialectic. Brain dominance is visual proof of the Hegelian dialectic at work, problem, reaction, solution. The Hegelian (Fichte's) dialectic is dual if it is dependent & independent of time (both at the same time):- Thesis (action, problem) is dual to anti-thesis (reaction) creates the converging thesis or synthesis (solution) -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton (the duality of force or all forces are dual). Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Duality creates reality! The Necker cube is a good example of duality. From a converging, convex or syntropic perspective everything looks divergent, concave or entropic -- the 2nd law of thermodynamics! All observers have a syntropic perspective. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Time symmetry is dual to time asymmetry -- time duality. Space symmetry is dual to space asymmetry -- space duality. Time duality is dual to space duality. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. The Big Bang is a Janus hole/point (two faces = duality) -- Julian Barbour physicist. Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic. Null Homotopic is dual to non null homotopic -- Duality.

@@upandatom @Up and Atom you are such a living walking piece of garbage I can't believe you just took this video and spun it into anti Big bang propaganda BS! One of the biggest problems with third dimensional existence is the fact that we think that whatever we can see we can measure accurately... This is completely untrue! If we sent out a enormous amount of spaceships that we could actually accurately track the distance in which they have traveled from this Earth and we mapped our entire galaxy it would be nothing but a tiny little speck compared to the entire universe of everything we can see. Accelerating expansion of the universe pass the speed of light and constantly picking up speed is an illusion caused by dark matter... Contrary to popular belief dark matter does interfere with regular matter. I think it's pretty audacious of the scientific community to say that dark matter has no interaction with regular matter when they haven't even identified what dark matter is comprised of and have never even found a dark matter particle!!! Everything bust forth from the singularity the problem is science wants to move itself away from the singularity because it realizes that the singularity is "God". Ultimately everything is one. Dark matter is the counter action force to the expansion of the universe... Let's say that dark matter is comprised of hooks instead of strings. This is the reason why we cannot view a dark matter particle and I've never found one because we are composed of strings these hooks can rip off tiny fractions of those strings of all material that pass through it and convert it into hooks. Light has mass this is the reason why I like cannot escape a black hole it is mass in motion when it comes to a resting point it no longer contains mass and it no longer exists. Light sheds its mass to maintain its velocity just like everything else. The reason why light cannot escape a black hole is because guess what it contains Mass anything that contains volume contains Mass... You cannot give something volume without giving it Mass! If you take a two-dimensional plane and you put it in any direction in any position near a black hole wherever you want to put it it will have absolutely zero interaction with a black hole! Do you know why because guess what in the second dimension there is absolutely no mass and therefore black hole cannot have any interaction with that two-dimensional plane! I'm not disagreeing with you on the fact that time can reverse and roll backwards but to think that anything ever started from anything other than a singularity is just insanity! This anti Big bang mindset is totally insane! Also this accelerating expansion of the universe pass the speed of light mindset is equally insane! And I completely understand what the idiot say about how since it is expanding into nothing it can pick up speed past the speed of light but that's just total garbage! Dark matter is absorbing bits and pieces of all energy that pass through it it is surrounding our entire solar system our entire galaxy and is constantly growing by absorbing bits and pieces of energy that pass through it ripping off strings fractions of a penny of mass and slowly increasing it's density... This is happening equally as this does happen and dark matter increases its density it creates an illusion of accelerating expansion of the universe past the speed of light! It is far more logical and far more reasonable to say this than to say any of the BS that people spout about anti Big bang! Sorry but I just couldn't let you get away with it especially when you leave it on a cliffhanger like that and obviously really don't know anything... There's a reason why your video got pushed to me by the KZfaq algorithm because it's nothing but BS propaganda anti Big bang anti-singularity anti-god BS crap! Then again none of us are immortal beings that have existed from the very beginning of time and will exist to the very end of time so none of us can experience real objective truth and objective truth does not exist here in the third dimension... So guess what I'm wrong and you are wrong and every single person here will be wrong and it is completely pointless to even try to figure anything out because guess what they will be wrong too!!!!

@@hyperduality2838 james joyce did this sort of thing. only his references i think all were coherent. i don’t have the time to check all yours unfortunately.

Coin can roll on edge so doubt it is less entropy.

Coin does not generally roll far it usually flips to one side or the other where there is less entropy.

Whenever I start giving up on my goal (same as yours), one of these videos pop up on my feed giving me the much needed inspiration to keep going!!

@@anandsharma967 Good luck, Anand!

Watch my video on Boltzmann brains to learn more about your questions :)

There is also a 4th law of thermodynamics, watch the spinning dancer:- kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i8d4artyrbWsqXk.html Bistability implies duality! Clockwise is dual to anti-clockwise. Left brain dominance is dual to right brain dominance. Master (Lordship) is dual to slave (Bondsman) -- the time dependent Hegelian dialectic. Brain dominance is visual proof of the Hegelian dialectic at work, problem, reaction, solution. The Hegelian (Fichte's) dialectic is dual if it is dependent & independent of time (both at the same time):- Thesis (action, problem) is dual to anti-thesis (reaction) creates the converging thesis or synthesis (solution) -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton (the duality of force or all forces are dual). Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Duality creates reality! The Necker cube is a good example of duality. From a converging, convex or syntropic perspective everything looks divergent, concave or entropic -- the 2nd law of thermodynamics! All observers have a syntropic perspective. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Time symmetry is dual to time asymmetry -- time duality. Space symmetry is dual to space asymmetry -- space duality. Time duality is dual to space duality. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. The Big Bang is a Janus hole/point (two faces = duality) -- Julian Barbour physicist. Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic. Null Homotopic is dual to non null homotopic -- Duality.

There is also a 4th law of thermodynamics, watch the spinning dancer:- kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i8d4artyrbWsqXk.html Bistability implies duality! Clockwise is dual to anti-clockwise. Left brain dominance is dual to right brain dominance. Master (Lordship) is dual to slave (Bondsman) -- the time dependent Hegelian dialectic. Brain dominance is visual proof of the Hegelian dialectic at work, problem, reaction, solution. The Hegelian (Fichte's) dialectic is dual if it is dependent & independent of time (both at the same time):- Thesis (action, problem) is dual to anti-thesis (reaction) creates the converging thesis or synthesis (solution) -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton (the duality of force or all forces are dual). Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Duality creates reality! The Necker cube is a good example of duality. From a converging, convex or syntropic perspective everything looks divergent, concave or entropic -- the 2nd law of thermodynamics! All observers have a syntropic perspective. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Time symmetry is dual to time asymmetry -- time duality. Space symmetry is dual to space asymmetry -- space duality. Time duality is dual to space duality. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. The Big Bang is a Janus hole/point (two faces = duality) -- Julian Barbour physicist. Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic. Null Homotopic is dual to non null homotopic -- Duality.

There is also a 4th law of thermodynamics, watch the spinning dancer:- kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i8d4artyrbWsqXk.html Bistability implies duality! Clockwise is dual to anti-clockwise. Left brain dominance is dual to right brain dominance. Master (Lordship) is dual to slave (Bondsman) -- the time dependent Hegelian dialectic. Brain dominance is visual proof of the Hegelian dialectic at work, problem, reaction, solution. The Hegelian (Fichte's) dialectic is dual if it is dependent & independent of time (both at the same time):- Thesis (action, problem) is dual to anti-thesis (reaction) creates the converging thesis or synthesis (solution) -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Action is dual to reaction -- Sir Isaac Newton (the duality of force or all forces are dual). Mind (the internal soul, syntropy) is dual to matter (the external soul, entropy) -- Descartes. Syntropy (prediction) is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics! Teleological physics (syntropy) is dual to non teleological physics (entropy). "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Duality creates reality! The Necker cube is a good example of duality. From a converging, convex or syntropic perspective everything looks divergent, concave or entropic -- the 2nd law of thermodynamics! All observers have a syntropic perspective. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. Time symmetry is dual to time asymmetry -- time duality. Space symmetry is dual to space asymmetry -- space duality. Time duality is dual to space duality. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. The Big Bang is a Janus hole/point (two faces = duality) -- Julian Barbour physicist. Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic. Null Homotopic is dual to non null homotopic -- Duality.