US Air Force Testing Brand New $4 Million Fully Electric Aircraft

Рет қаралды 817,627

3 ай бұрын

Welcome back to the FLUCTUS channel for a discussion about how the United States is looking to incorporate electric aircraft for both military and civilian purposes.
Fluctus is a website and KZfaq channel dedicated to sea geeks. Whenever you are curious or an incorrigible lover of this mysterious world, our videos are made for you !
We publish 3 videos a week on our KZfaq channel and many more articles on our website.
Feel free to subscribe to not miss any of our updates and visit our website to discover additional content.
Don’t forget to follow us on twitter:
/ fluctusofficial
Please keep the comments section respectful. Any spam, insults or troll will be deleted.
To contact us, make sure to use our email in the about section of this channel.

Пікірлер: 581

@ocalaguy32195 3 ай бұрын

Will KC-135s now have in-flight charging cables?

@donmason2933 3 ай бұрын

The refueling plane will drop a case of Harbor Freight AA batteries.........

@randywilson944 3 ай бұрын

KC-46 or The Sunshine Band will replace it.

@brucewygal133 3 ай бұрын

lol

@pietpiet7041 3 ай бұрын

Yes, WiFi connetion.

@soulsacrify 2 ай бұрын

No just a fucking long extension cable, plugged into the smoko room

@nalakirkwood4425 Ай бұрын

The Rolls-Royce electric plane is sensational. Looks amazing and so much fun!

@javedkhan1023 Ай бұрын

This technology will change aviation positively. 🚁✈

@rupep2424 3 ай бұрын

Electric supports low noise, heat & maintenance. Add a little stealth & ground-based power (fabric solar panels + batteries?), and maybe you'd have a handy 'flying jeep' etc

@mohamedbaza9573 3 ай бұрын

It is very good. All my best wishes for you and USA

@user-yg1zp8uk4d 2 ай бұрын

Thank you ❤

@jaaklucas1329 2 ай бұрын

Locally here Harbour Air has been testing a retrofit electric on a float plane. The majority of their trips are short shuttle,30-50kish which is perfect for charging between trips. The weight of battery packs has to be considered. The pilot says the torque at takeoff is quite superior!

@bwphotoguy1 3 ай бұрын

This test is probably intended to produce a large weaponized drone from this.

@krasslofw.4393 3 ай бұрын

What's next? Electric tank? Missile? Aircraft carrier? Spaceship?

@hwrdgrn 3 ай бұрын

Yes. Once upon a time ships used sails, then transitioned to steam. Ground forces used pointy sticks, and then found something better. The future belongs to those who are willing to adapt, not those who are stuck in the past.

@krasslofw.4393 3 ай бұрын

@@hwrdgrn your review is correct, showing an development towards use of steadily increasing energy density. The future like in the past will be created by those who accept and use the laws of physics without being corrupted by ideology.

@TomokosEnterprize 3 ай бұрын

They are already there and testing other ideas.

@RealMTBAddict 3 ай бұрын

@@hwrdgrnNo, electric vehicles aren't the future. Maybe do some research.

@spitlikesfire9368 3 ай бұрын

Only thing i dis agree with is electric comab vehicles at least until we get reliable and actually efficient way of charging them and were they can be better then gas@hwrdgrn

@kf7bws 3 ай бұрын

Another thought. Lithium Ion batteries are light and the most energy dense. However it is illegal to transport them by air on commercial airlines. How about all the fires we have seen caused by Lithium Ion batteries. Not a good feature when flying at thousands of feet.

@manfredstrappen7491 3 ай бұрын

1) Lithium batteries are carried on cargo only flights. 2)Know what else you can’t carry on commercial airlines? Missiles, grenades, bombs, etc. You see, the military can do lots of things civilians can’t.

@Hyposonic 2 ай бұрын

Gasoline has 100X the energy density of a Li-Ion battery. In practical terms, that means a 737's range would be 31.6mi instead of 3160mi. That would be 90 stops for a flight from NYC to LAX.

@PitWChannel 2 ай бұрын

So why can't I take a can of gasoline as my hand luggage in commercial flights then?

@darrellmcever340 Ай бұрын

@@Hyposonic NOT USABLE Energy. Go do your homework....

@Hyposonic Ай бұрын

@@darrellmcever340 As I am a designer of high-performance Li-Ion batteries, I'd love to hear your groundbreaking insights.

@joistein 3 ай бұрын

How is the battery made and where does the power come from?

@ViolentKisses87 2 ай бұрын

You are thinking about it too hard it's ZERO EMISSIONS!

@fetB 2 ай бұрын

how is fuel made and where does the power come from to make it

@ViolentKisses87 2 ай бұрын

@@fetB details, details. Look not at the man behind the curtain.

@krisspkriss 2 ай бұрын

It comes from the blood of children and is made by dark magic rituals lead by the Great Orange One.

@pumpedupdart6859 2 ай бұрын

@@fetB so you're admitting both require fossil fuels??? Nice self own. LOL Plus we have to deal with dirty batteries, lower speeds, much longer refuel times, more weight, all new infrastructure....

@Justwantahover Ай бұрын

10:00 At last a clear shot of a UFO! 😅

@joeottsoulbikes415 3 ай бұрын

I recently saw a video on a plane going the complete opposite way. It had the stock Rolls rotary motor taken out and a super charged LS swapped in with a custom transmission gearing it so it could fly at 3,000 rpm and nit the usual 6 or 7000 rpm most plane motors spin at.

@Wm200 2 ай бұрын

All very cool but the big issue why we will not see them anytime soon is simply the power. Less than a hour flight time?

@hanneslimbach2505 2 ай бұрын

Which is more then enough for many situations, emergency helicopters often have gas for less then 45 minutes on regular missions to be able to perform in difficult conditions

@brucebaker3523 2 ай бұрын

Using portable diesel generators to charge EV aircraft makes complete sense to me!

@PitWChannel 2 ай бұрын

What if the goal is aircrafts which are more quiet?

@brucebaker3523 2 ай бұрын

@@PitWChannel That's what drones are for!

@douglasdavis3603 3 ай бұрын

The plane of the future, and always will be.

@patstenzel 2 ай бұрын

Dream on

@carlbeaver7112 2 ай бұрын

Who sees a KC-135 dangling an extension cord out the rear to do a mid-air recharge? ;-)

@PiefacePete46 4 күн бұрын

An excellent compilation, thank you. 👍

@daciamcv1026 2 ай бұрын

would make a great air ambulance depending on price

@thatbeme 3 ай бұрын

It's great. I will own one, one day. 😊

@matthewspry4217 3 ай бұрын

Lean green killing machine, even the tree huggers are happy

@stevecam724 3 ай бұрын

Maybe nuclear fueled electric planes but not rechargeable. How would you recharge hundreds at the same time and what do you do about the extended turn around times?

@nalakirkwood4425 Ай бұрын

Yes, micro nuclear would be next level!!

@DJAYPAZ 2 ай бұрын

I wonder if a TCAS like system will be incorporated into the Joby aircraft.

@MarkBarrack 3 ай бұрын

5:36 I have been following Beta for years. Congratulations to them f9r their hard work.

@blhplays5107 18 күн бұрын

They released their transition video a few hours ago, go check it out!

@iliketacos6067 2 ай бұрын

thats one of the sexiest air planes i have ever seen

@garymiller5937 3 ай бұрын

Hmm. Interesting video. 😊😊😊❤❤❤

@southpark4151 2 ай бұрын

The main thing is always - how long can we fly for with a battery. And how to totally avoid over-heating, electrical fire, running out of juice due to wrong data about the energy level, ending in tears etc.

@JohnDoe-lt6ty 3 ай бұрын

what charges the batteries? (a diesel generator behind the building)

@soaringeagle 2 ай бұрын

Solar, wind, clean energy. Don’t be stupid.

@frankyyaggabot6222 22 күн бұрын

@@soaringeagle Yeah smart, because today's Armed Forces only want to operate when the sun is shining!

@nevilleoliver1883 3 ай бұрын

The horse drawn carriage will never be replaced!

@ayamhitam9794 3 ай бұрын

Yes! A flying horse could replaced airplanes. Scientist should find a way to bring back to life Pegasus and those prehistoric flying reptiles

@Dave-ty2qp 3 ай бұрын

Peguasus, and Santa's Reindeer could do much to relieve our fantasies in transpoeration. And it's amazing what Fairy Godmothers can do with pumpkins. 😀 @@ayamhitam9794

@mahmoodsoleja9068 3 ай бұрын

Superb ! 🌟

@arnaldoborghi2194 16 күн бұрын

War Cenario: Please wait a minute, income missile, I have to land to charge!!!

@fritzrentsch9943 3 ай бұрын

Never forget: A dream is a dream. The things take time, a lot of time

@soaringeagle 2 ай бұрын

They are developing fast and will be the norm in 5 years

@amitmadhu5440 2 ай бұрын

Yeah, it needs time. But people also trying reducing time.

@lcfflc3887 2 ай бұрын

Not on lithium.

@soaringeagle 2 ай бұрын

@@lcfflc3887 why not? But they are developing new technologies all the time. NASA has a new battery that’s impressive. But lithium puts out a lot of power fast, so it’s great for the use

@ralphbuschman3364 3 ай бұрын

Electric motors may have start up advantages. Where in application like elevator they do well. In a plane or drone how well does power transmission to individual user get done?

@soaringeagle 2 ай бұрын

You never drove an ev? They are vastly superior.

@daytona3927 Ай бұрын

When they can fly from CA to the Philippines let me know.

@joells371 3 ай бұрын

So.. is there a tactical solar panel system that is laid out in a tactical, bomb-proof arrangement?

@MrSaemichlaus 2 ай бұрын

They will tactically push the airplane around on the ground in circles for two days to tactically recupe enough energy to then fly to the next tactical diesel generator with tactically hotwired charging plug.

@jollyroger7624 2 ай бұрын

Extra mileage available with an extension cable.

@tubeviewerX20 2 ай бұрын

This is cool. But I think for now hybrid aircraft will be the best immediate answer, especially when solar power becomes more reliable.

@SemourKlitz 3 ай бұрын

Awesome innovation and your content presented with the epitome of professionalism. I immediately subscribed!

@stevecam724 3 ай бұрын

FANBOY alert 😁😁😁😁

@duanium 2 ай бұрын

I envision an aircraft propulsion system utilizing plasma jets for faster speed than propeller air propulsion. But as to whether the Air Force and the Space Force has any plans for such a situation for future air and space dominance largely depends on the kind of energy plant research for aircraft and spacecraft that is feasible.

@Mixologist-fc4sc Ай бұрын

How is this aircraft going to recharge in the field. Seems very impractical, unless you need to go stealth mode.

@hakonhalldorsson6673 3 ай бұрын

The dream of flying cars always amuses me. While generation of lift is done with propellers of any shape or form, the noise will render the concept a non-starter. We've had 3 helicopters ferrying tourists to see a local volcano when it is active and they fly over the capital every 30 minutes or so. Just 3 of them are driving everyone nuts here. They are small 4-6 passenger light helicopters. Also consider the limits set on drone flights because the sound they make bothers people at tourist attractions (not to mention hazard of falling onto someone). All videos trying to present flying "cars" as a good idea always cut out the sound and play some gentle music instead. These things would be crazy loud if you consider they are just really big drones.

@chipcook5346 Күн бұрын

How does the graph go? A line for every year and a parallel line nine years to the right labeled "flying car"?

@John-nc4bl 3 ай бұрын

Will an e-drone have any advantage(s) over an e-helicopter-?

@galactuscausandoimpactus9521 3 ай бұрын

O custo por hora de vôo 👍

@sbeasley4263 Ай бұрын

What was used to make the power to charge the batteries?

@Tr3vor.7he.K1d 3 ай бұрын

Move us forward!!!! We could be just using power of wind. Lol

@brucesmith5426 20 күн бұрын

Where are the aircraft with windmills above the wings? I'll bet these electric expensive play toys will be good targets.

@kf7bws 3 ай бұрын

I am very much in favor of new technology and innovation. There is a place for any or all electric vehicles. However electric has a big short coming, energy density. Battery technology does not have an even close energy density to carbon based fuels. Energy density in batteries will continue to improve but in my view it will be many years before it approaches that of carbon based fuels. So for a very long time there will be a market need for both. Unless great detail to safety and backup systems are payed attention to a single fuse could down an aircraft. As a former military person and an Electronic Engineering Technician, in a combat situation a fast recharge will still need to be accomplished by carbon based fuel generators mitigating the zero emission aspect. I should suggest helical toroidal propellers which would increase efficiency by about twenty percent. Keep moving ahead this is impressive technology.

@hanswallner2188 2 ай бұрын

You need much less energy in an electric aircraft, even todays lithium ion batteries are able to provide around one hour of flight time for electric aircraft, there are already certified electric planes out there, and they have 10 year old battery technology. As right now energy density goes up by the month, in the very near future flight times around 2 hours will be possible, which is more than enough for many tasks (short range passenger flights, emergency services, package delivery...) electric aircraft will have tremendously reduced costs per flighttime, as all the hot section engine problems go away, electric motors do not need regular maintenance, cost reduction will be HUGE !

@kf7bws 2 ай бұрын

@@hanswallner2188 Lift is determined by the shape and size of the wings. Pound for pound it takes the same amount of energy to get identical panes in the air regardless of whether it is fossil fuels or electric. "You need much less energy in an electric aircraft," is not true. Getting an aircraft in the air is not the issue maintaining flight is the issue. As you stated "lithium ion batteries are able to provide around one hour of flight time" fossil fuels have a much higher energy density, meaning they can stay in the air longer. Someday it may be a reality that we will have long range electric flight, it is not today.

@chipcook5346 Күн бұрын

You make complete sense. However, the video maker as well as a number of Pentagon brass have a hardon for this. But don't worry. Once a dozen lives are wasted in a serious situation, they will dial it all back.

@John-nc4bl 3 ай бұрын

Drones are cumbersome with their sprouting support arms for propellers. Kinda like antlers on a deer. In comparison, helicopters are compact.

@nabilalanbar 3 ай бұрын

They aren't drones.

@replica1052 3 ай бұрын

a stratolaunch with a lifting body between the fuselages flying high, fast and efficiently while dropping empty batteries as autonomous planes would certainly make it across the pacific

@spxram4793 3 ай бұрын

it made much more sense to use electrical drives and brakes on the landing gear, to avoid using the turbines for taxiing and gain some energy when braking.

@replica1052 3 ай бұрын

@@spxram4793 an electric a-10 would have no heat signature and the batteries would be extra armour

@garygeorge9648 3 ай бұрын

talk about polluting the ocean.

@replica1052 3 ай бұрын

@@garygeorge9648 (you can land autonomous planes wherever you want them to land )

@npmetzy5737 2 ай бұрын

😆

@juanar4305 3 ай бұрын

4:18 It reminds me of the Supermarine S.6B, or its successor, the Spitfire of WWII.

@aisulutursunbekovna6275 3 ай бұрын

Будьте осторожней, скачки температуры на высоте, могут сыграть плохую шутку с электричеством и батареей. Проверил на тесле-тележке, ездит нормально, но на температурный режим тележка никуда не годиться.

@galactuscausandoimpactus9521 3 ай бұрын

Obrigado pela informação 🙂

@robertbetancourt1386 Ай бұрын

So why is the Civl Air Patrol(Air Force Auxilarry ) using Cessna aircraft made in Mexico with the fewest young pilots?

@kimkeam2094 2 ай бұрын

I applaud the emphasis towards technological changes in the aviation industry however it will always come down to practicality. Electric isn’t ready yet, not only due to capacity but also safety. Battery design has to change dramatically to reduce risk overall. Can you please review the negatives as well. I see only the spin on the positive side of electric with your site.

@user-zd5ki9dn5t 24 күн бұрын

It would make flights in volcanic ashes.🌋

@nexe7271 3 ай бұрын

How long is extension cord???

@simons.2948 2 ай бұрын

I’m a pilot & I’m pretty good at it, proof being solo record in my club & winning competitions. I can say pilots are like car drivers, some good, some average & some not so good. I really can’t imagine lots of citizens of the world flying around together, would be chaos & dangerous. I guess safety systems would eventually cure that though?

@ristube3319 3 ай бұрын

10:20 If that was a real thing, I’d sell a kidney tomorrow. 😂

@jslevenson101 22 сағат бұрын

It helps if a plane can glide to the ground.

@gregbumgardner3006 3 ай бұрын

On that white military craft i saw only one big prop on the back. Were there two on those round wing pillars up front??

@TeslaBulldotcom 3 ай бұрын

It should have 4 lift props, I think that was old footage where they were just flying the plane conventionally using just the pusher at the back, as can be seen it can be flown conventionally from an airstrip and will have VTOL capability as well.

@norad8u 2 ай бұрын

Why are the top facing rotors being hidden from view?!

@lewissimpson4020 2 ай бұрын

Someone payed off somebody!

@ristube3319 3 ай бұрын

4:54 This has to be the future of commercial helicopters.

@yezhang2947 3 ай бұрын

Can it win a war?

@dumitrulangham1721 3 ай бұрын

It’s a start

@ristube3319 3 ай бұрын

4:11 3000 feet is basically a half of a mile? The bar was that low for Guinness World Record people?!

@mxr572 3 ай бұрын

where are you getting Epower on the battlefield? gas/ diesel generators. new fuel copters and tilt wings more useful and reliable.

@tmharperjr 3 ай бұрын

The V-22 tilt rotor aircraft are currently grounded because they keep crashing. 😂 Where are you getting gas / diesel on a battlefield? ⛽️ It’s explosive, heavy, and expensive. 💥

@kirairce Ай бұрын

4:38 GOOD shape!!!

@logicalthoughts 2 ай бұрын

Would work if they can swap the battery after each use. Better idea for a plane than a car, like Nio.

@royalscot4116 16 күн бұрын

Lots of money in back door defence contracts! Cessnas are not heavy on fuel.

@williamdrake2315 2 ай бұрын

Would think if the batteries hit by shrapnel it would catch fire.

@homevids 2 ай бұрын

Great video flupdup

@MM-mo2yc 2 ай бұрын

I suspect it wont be stationed in Alaska.

@Dons166 3 ай бұрын

Mid air recharging?

@calanmacleod3948 3 ай бұрын

Zero emissions? Really how did you generator produce the electricity.

@phasor50 2 ай бұрын

Can use any means to generate the electricity. wind, solar, coal, nuclear, in the future it will be fusion.

@chipcook5346 Күн бұрын

Don't be silly. All they have to do is build a wall. There's automatically electricity in every wall. Just plug in.

@edutaimentcartoys 3 ай бұрын

wow electric planes

@jamesripley 12 күн бұрын

I can`t put up with continuous beat , music?

@edlinke2368 2 ай бұрын

why doent it have solar panels on it to see how long it can fly

@Pilotc180 Ай бұрын

This will be about as dependable as the horrible Osprey tilt rotor

@drgeoffangel5422 3 ай бұрын

Few emissions where the craft is, but not at the power station!

@RealMTBAddict 3 ай бұрын

Nevermind that!!!!😂

@MachinecoMachines 3 ай бұрын

You are REALLY uninformed. the "power station" is more and more solar, wind and nuclear, if not hydro and geo thermal. AS solid state batteries improve, storage of peak and over windy and sunny days, will even it out and we can ONCE again rely on the sun- directly instead of waiting 60,000 millions of years for sun grown vegetation to turn into coal and oil. Recently one MAJOR European country experienced enough solar and wind, it could power the entire country!

@scottleggejr 3 ай бұрын

@@MachinecoMachineswell we have a lot to look forward to I suppose. Until then, this is just a massive waste of time and money 😂

@flyer617 3 ай бұрын

@@scottleggejr Yeah the horse and buggy people said that about automobiles too.

@scottleggejr 3 ай бұрын

@@flyer617 no they didn't. They were thankful that their "horses" didn't get sick and need food and water anymore. This is the dumbest argument when people talk about the merits of EV vs the established standards existing today.

@thomasweilbacher1812 2 ай бұрын

thank you for the post

@GalenSkinner-iq6ff 3 ай бұрын

This will be good for movement from point a to b😂.....

@gmc2016 Ай бұрын

What is the name of the soundtrack in the beginning?

@vsznry 2 ай бұрын

One of the biggest reasons theyre investing in this is because of the lower weight of putting a bunch of these in that C-130 transport plane or within carriers. .Weight = fuel = money.

@brucewygal133 2 ай бұрын

You really think they are lighter with all the batteries they require. EV cars are not lighter than gas fueled cars.

@chipcook5346 Күн бұрын

So, a petrol powered airplane with drained tanks weighs so very much more than a plane with batteries? What about the diesel generator that will produce the electricity for the fantastic batteries? I know, it's a rub between diesel and aviation fuel weight.

@chipcook5346 Күн бұрын

And since when does the Pentagon care about money?

@user-hg2rz6dr7j 3 ай бұрын

I’ve questions people, how do you think, where there are take power for it? Coal, oil and nuclear fuel? And how are batteries produced and disposed of?

@fma116 3 ай бұрын

Weight and Earth's gravity are the main enemies of flying objects. It would be a leap in technology if someone or somebody can invent anti-gravity technology to defeat Earth's gravity.

@athosbulgari6571 3 ай бұрын

Waiting for next EMBRAER...

@hypersonicmonkeybrains3418 2 ай бұрын

interesting design but they should build a military version that runs on kerosene. Would have better power density.

@rickgeller6043 3 ай бұрын

Another Green Energy Flight Contractor is in development of a rubber band powered aircraft.

@markmaugle4599 3 ай бұрын

Where do they get the electricity they need on the front line of a war? It is much quicker to fuel up a plane than to recharge it.

@MarkBarrack 3 ай бұрын

Hot swap batteries. Shouldn't take longer than refueling. One problem is an entire infrastructure and supply chain needs to be created. Maybe a battery standard so different vehicles can share? Just my thought.

@timothyjburton 3 ай бұрын

@@MarkBarrack How does that work out when the weather is super cold. Those Telsa trucks have been doing great in Rockies this winter.... /s

@textech4056 3 ай бұрын

Pretty sure there won't be electric flying things until they come up with a light weight battery.

@robertweekley5926 3 ай бұрын

High Probability that Hybrid, or Plug-in Hybrid will be a "Starting Point" on that Path, Which Will allow for Multi-Mode Operations: - Pure Electric, Straight Generator, and Supplemental Generator Operational Modes. IE: Whisper Mode, Range Extended Modes, and Battery Emergency Boost Potential. (Like Nitrous, at the track!)

@oronjoffe 3 ай бұрын

As the presenter said “it doesn’t have much potenrial use in the military as yet”. It’s work in progress. You need to start somewhere…

@samanthajones4877 2 ай бұрын

If war breaks out, I hope our enemies would be considerate and allow us at least 8 hours to charge our batteries before the fight begins.

@mehere8-32 4 күн бұрын

EMP? Never heard of it.

@chipcook5346 Күн бұрын

That would knock out regular fuel planes, too.

@terencegreen3399 2 ай бұрын

How it zero emissions where your electricity come from

@felixaudet5860 3 ай бұрын

Beetles also feature electric flight, in the form of ionic charge. Shouldn't we copy nature? Advanced aviation doesn't need lifting surfaces.

@MegaGeorge1948 Ай бұрын

The LiOn battery has a very long way to go to equal the energy density to do the work of a fossil fuel.

@bernardjones6162 3 ай бұрын

And just where do you think they get the batteries charged and by what? Nuclear or coal fired generators!

@--.--.-- 3 ай бұрын

Hope it doesn't get caught in the rain...

@matthewspry4217 3 ай бұрын

Imagine airdropping a hexa to downed pilot so they can escape to a war zone

@steffanjansenvanvuuren3257 3 ай бұрын

Does the place the generated the electricity have zero emissions...yes/no?

@benp439 3 ай бұрын

I think the military is probably interested in reducing the reliance on fuel. They don't care about the environment very much. Transporting fuel is a vulnerable and expensive part of military logistics. Reducing reliance on one specific fuel is an advantage.

@SpectreNight 18 күн бұрын

Once battery capacity isn't an issue, this market will explode for military first, then civilian.

@Mark-oj8wj 2 ай бұрын

Zero emissions??? Where do they get the electricity to charge the batteries?

@hanneslimbach2505 2 ай бұрын

Obviously as much as possible out of renewable energy, but even when powered by a coal plant electric flight is still much cheaper and more environmental friendly as efficiency of electric propultion is completely in another league.

@garygeorge9648 3 ай бұрын

So that plane can fly out around 100 miles and then return to be charged and maintained for a couple of hours before being used again. Maybe good for short hops but that is about all.

@MarkBarrack 3 ай бұрын

Seems that's about right. Beta is building out landing pads mostly in the northeast.

@zvorenergy 2 ай бұрын

Batteries just dont have the energy density. However, if you beam the power onto the craft from a C-band maser it changes the game. The best fuel is no fuel. The best battery is no battery.😁

@MrFritzzz666 3 ай бұрын

Rolls Royce is known primarily for its luxury cars. How you could mess that up is just plain confounding.

@kf7bws 3 ай бұрын

Rolls Royce has been providing aircraft engines long before the second world war. Every commercial aircraft builder in the world has used Rolls Royce engines.

@MrFritzzz666 3 ай бұрын

@@kf7bws And how many 'common folk' know this? virtually NONE. So my assertion stands as accurate in the context of the common man