US Air Force Testing Brand New Boeing Tiny Supersonic Jet

Рет қаралды 812,492

Ай бұрын

Welcome back to the FLUCTUS channel for a discussion about some of the more important training jets in use by the United States military.
Fluctus is a website and KZfaq channel dedicated to sea geeks. Whenever you are curious or an incorrigible lover of this mysterious world, our videos are made for you !
We publish 3 videos a week on our KZfaq channel and many more articles on our website.
Feel free to subscribe to not miss any of our updates and visit our website to discover additional content.
Don’t forget to follow us on twitter:
/ fluctusofficial
Please keep the comments section respectful. Any spam, insults or troll will be deleted.
To contact us, make sure to use our email in the about section of this channel.

Пікірлер: 190

@alanbadilla7003 Ай бұрын

If it's Boeing then I'm not going.

@r123154 Ай бұрын

I Love It . I say it everytime i have to fly . Always have , always will. Go Boeing..

@asdrubalanibal6853 28 күн бұрын

It’s a Saab. Boeing added its name when “partnering” to produce it domestically for the US military and the Global Market.

@exit1368 25 күн бұрын

@alanbadilla7003 ??? Are you going to pass up your USAF pilot training slot & potential career in military aviation because of this contractor? 🤭 LOL 👎

@alanbadilla7003 25 күн бұрын

@@exit1368 yes

@thetigerstripes 23 күн бұрын

🤣😂😆👍🏻

@VicariousPropaganda Ай бұрын

Those T-38s sure do look like like MiG 28s😂

@ExecuteBrandon 28 күн бұрын

You’ve got security clearance, you can read about it!

@halfpintcustoms3428 20 күн бұрын

That’s closer 😆

@daveberg7091 17 күн бұрын

There never was an official P-51 trainer, and the less than a dozen field modification aircraft, TP-51C, were not used after WW2.

@wzman2006 Ай бұрын

The upgraded T-38 with advanced avionics and upgraded engines is the T-38C. The T-38A is the legacy version that has been around since the 60's.

@sekabkilo22rangedog8 Ай бұрын

Lol "digital design has sped up delivery process".... T-7 is years behind schedule....😂

@jakobholgersson4400 23 күн бұрын

The program itself has been delayed for many years, but the T-7 was developed very quickly. It's delayed by a few months only.

@chul-habaik5649 Ай бұрын

Recently, Boeing has been in a lot of trouble, including with the T-7A, because its production is really behind schedule. Besides, the T-7a is not supersonic. Its maximum speed is 0.97 sound speed.

@GordonjSmith1 Ай бұрын

I think BOEING will have learnt a lot from this collaboration. It may well also influence how they build the software for their commercial jets.

@tomascastillo4676 27 күн бұрын

An armed version of this jet would be ideal for low budget airforces and a good competitor for KAI FA-50 block 20.

@user-gv7xc7mx9q 25 күн бұрын

아음속기가 어떻게 FA50의 경쟁자가 된다는건지? T7은 그냥 정찰기나 훈련기정도밖에 못씀

@Artty-fl8ul 3 сағат бұрын

I like it. I think our back up forces should be reliable and affordable instead of so high tech and expensive. IMHO.

@alanmcmillan6969 Ай бұрын

Interesting new plane. Sounds like a good addition.

@kevinchallinor9116 Ай бұрын

Apart from the tail, looks a lot like the Hawk which the RAF has been using for years

@oxcart4172 11 күн бұрын

U mean the jet at the beginning? That's because it is a Hawk!

@alehandrodel817 Ай бұрын

Wooow! How much I love to get trained with this beautiful!

@petter5721 Ай бұрын

Partly designed and made by SAAB, Sweden. A perfect collaboration 👍🏻

@ExecuteBrandon 28 күн бұрын

Boeing + Saab… 😂😂

@PK-il8xm 27 күн бұрын

65% of the aircraft is SAAB. Produced in Indiana.

@ExecuteBrandon 26 күн бұрын

@@PK-il8xm Even worse… lol

@garymiller5937 Ай бұрын

Super interesting aircraft! Thanks for the video and explanations. 😊😊😊😊😊❤❤❤❤❤ 😎

@alanmcmillan6969 Ай бұрын

Great to see the heads up to the Red tails!

@gaddyify Ай бұрын

👍👍👍👍

@ainsleystones4600 14 күн бұрын

Folland Gnat pilots: "Hold my beer..."

@bradolsen8629 Ай бұрын

That is a cute little jet

@aronsta 17 күн бұрын

4:26 "the highly advanced digital design process..." as an engineer measures a part using dial calipers

@P-J-W-777 Ай бұрын

The T-7 as a replacement for the F-16! 😂😂😂😂 Yea, right! The F-16 would wax that back side!

@user-it8mt3zg9f Ай бұрын

Jeeze...I'm sure the taxpayer got 'a real deal'.

@jwagner1993 Ай бұрын

This'll never replace anything but the talon trainer. It's extremely limited. Was designed to be cheap and easy to maintain. And the old days of the freedom fighters market are gone

@mdfarooqkhan7631 Ай бұрын

Informative video

@gtv6chuck Ай бұрын

The fact that it is not yet operational 8 years after its first flight is an embarrassment. It took less than 4 years from first flight to operational for the F15.

@chrisgoblin4857 21 күн бұрын

I've read that in the short time of development of the F-15, 2.5 million man hours of work took place. That's insane but it was seen as a huge priority for the USAF at the time with the perceived threat of the Foxbat. I'm sure the amount of man hours allocated to a trainer will be a lot less than a mainstay strike fighter with the capability of the F-15. I do agree though, they are definitely taking their time.

@davidogden7157 28 күн бұрын

hope the wheels don't fall off lol

@cdnpont Ай бұрын

Looks like it would be a joy to fly. Looks right. I have not read any comments below.

@DanO530.8 4 күн бұрын

So cool to see the red tale airmen the T GUYS

@miroslavantonic8705 Ай бұрын

Looking like Yugoslav G4 except two tail back !(?)

@omarjassar4650 Ай бұрын

Make sure you give the pilot some duct tape and super glue to make sure parts don't fall off 😊😊😊

@jinkenz6459 Ай бұрын

ejector seats. LOLOL.

@omarjassar4650 Ай бұрын

@@jinkenz6459 it's a Boeing

@DanDan-os6hd Ай бұрын

Your not the smartest knife in the drawer obviously. @@omarjassar4650

@josebrown5961 Ай бұрын

They are finally putting the T38 out to pasture. It was one of the first jets I as a kid fell for. My dad took me to see the Thunderbirds and they were flying T38s. I wonder how much one would cost you?

@BernieGolgo13 2 күн бұрын

Saab had already built the plane. Boeing just licensed them.

@user-jq5fx2me9e Ай бұрын

確かに、小型でドローンを破壊する戦闘機って必要かも。

@josephgunter2563 Ай бұрын

I think there's 4 arresting wires..and number 3 being consider the best to hit..

@user-en9zo2ol4z 27 күн бұрын

The Red-Hock? What ever it is called, it is truly beautiful.

@paulsteaven Ай бұрын

They're still testing the T-7A when USAF could've flying their new trainer if they chose the T-50A.

@craigjones2162 Ай бұрын

Not necessarily. The holdup is the ejection seat 💺 for lighter pilots. I.E. women

@paulsteaven Ай бұрын

@@craigjones2162 that problem has been fixed by KAI/Lockheed Martin decades ago. Female ROKAF fighter pilots uses their T-50 in LIFT.

@YourAirworthiness 11 сағат бұрын

The P51 was never used as a basic trainer.

@Terracotta-warriors_Sea 23 күн бұрын

This jet has the potential to be a light fighter in league with Saab Gripen, FA-50, JF17, Tejas. Exportable to countries that can’t afford F16.

@JesseJames-kv7xc Ай бұрын

excellent video as usually. thank you.

@yuexue1964 20 күн бұрын

FA-50같은 쓰래기보단 확실히 디자인도 멋있고 성능도 좋아보임 가격도 저렴하고

@diogo9365 Ай бұрын

legal! Mas acho que a fuselagem é inferior a do f22 e f35.

@luffirton 27 күн бұрын

I totally understand the Military for investing in trainer aircraft’s with more and more advanced fighters going single seater having a two seater trainer aircraft will help tremendously with flight training of pilots

@asquare9316 21 күн бұрын

all trainers have always been 2 seaters, at least since WWI.

@RonyHO-kd4lh Ай бұрын

Make sure all bolts are tighten and no extra bolts on the ground. Lol.

@mastrsk8 8 күн бұрын

I’d say something about Boeing, but I want to live!

@british_772 Ай бұрын

The A-10 Thunderbolt II is a beautiful supersonic all-weather stealth fighter aircraft~♥

@parthasur6018 Ай бұрын

The A10 It is a subsonic ground attack aircraft.

@craigjones2162 Ай бұрын

Supersonic... LMAO 😅

@gregparrott Ай бұрын

Whoa! While I'm sure you're trolling, you're right that the Warthog is beautiful in its own right. The TOP SPEED of the A-10 is 420 MPH. The transition between subsonic and supersonic is at 767 MPH (at sea level pressures) So, you're a tad short of supersonic - by 347 MPH to be reasonably precise

@gregparrott Ай бұрын

Evidently, you've yet to hear about the latest stealth, supersonic Cessna.

@ratanroy5699 Ай бұрын

U chikii that's new tactics to get attentions

@oxcart4172 11 күн бұрын

At least the doors can't fall off!

@tundahking 8 күн бұрын

They are trying to make sure the door don't fly off.only flying airbus from now on.i don't want to die

@PapiCthulu2 Ай бұрын

But it's a Boenig!!

@lorimarcopulos7576 Ай бұрын

Spellcheck? Last I heard it was "BOEING"

@user-rp2nq1ev6x Ай бұрын

The United States Air Force was not established until 1947.

@ExecuteBrandon 28 күн бұрын

T-38… aka MiG-28 from Top Gun. 😂

@gusgone4527 25 күн бұрын

It's a good trainer but not in the same league as the Aeralis Advanced Jet Trainer. Just you wait and see!

@PBRCars Ай бұрын

Jim bede would be proud of his bd10

@bethzarin6439 Ай бұрын

Why not US make a WAR version of this for the Philippine Air Force. With features intended for Naval defense and naval interception. Large fuel tanks and can carry anti ship missiles. And electronic warfare system. It doesn't need to make dogfight or air to air battle as it will be the job of the US supplied SAM's, it just need enough speed to back away after delivering its ordnance and the SAMS will do it's job when the enemy catches up. We need at least 120 Units of this jets to cover the entire WPS.

@yokoyoko191 14 күн бұрын

Keren sayapnya.

@wintergarten3860 25 күн бұрын

T-7 Red Hawk trainer developed by Boeing and Swedish Saab.

@RichNotWealthy Ай бұрын

The P-51 Mustang was widely used as a trainer?? Where did that come from? There were rare two seat conversions during WW2 but never a fleet of TP-51s that i know of. Civilian owned P-51s have been converted to two seaters to provide flight experiences and to sell rides. Makes me wonder what else the vid gets wrong

@jct1616 Ай бұрын

regarding the TP-51C two seat trainer, Found this exact quote on several websites: “The TP-51C was a field modification that added a second seat with a full second set of controls and instrumentation that could be used for training purposes. There were at least 5 TP-51Cs that were built during WWII for training purposes, and VIP transport.”

@RichNotWealthy Ай бұрын

@@jct1616 Yes, 5 TP-51s. But this vid gives the impression that the USAF used Mustangs widely as trainers until they were retired. The last Mustang in USAF service was an F-51D of the WVANG. Retired in 1957. If the vid creators felt the need to review past trainers there were several piston engine trainers more appropriate to a discussion of training aircraft. The T-6 and T-28 for instance

@charleslee58 24 күн бұрын

Tom Cruz has one

@williamallmon3713 12 күн бұрын

Exactly right. The Mustangs were not used as trainers! 6:31

@jct1616 12 күн бұрын

@@williamallmon3713 the video is 100% correct about Trainer Mustangs. TP-51 existed as fighter pilot trainers with controls in BOTH Front and Back passengers long after WWII until enough Jet Trainers were built in the 1960s. Some confusion comes from regular mustangs center seat tank removed allowing room for a passenger, but with no flight controls. This is what Tom Cruise owns. Toms mustang was built in 1946 as a P-51K modified to appear like WWII iconic p-51D but with center tank removed allowing for a passenger seat (no flight controls in back) Found this quote with a bit of search “After WWII, the USAAF consolidated much of its fighter aircraft. Most piston powered fighters served substantially reduced roles as more advanced jet powered aircraft emerged. The Mustang still proved useful serving in the Korean War and state-side in the Air Force Reserves and National Air Guard. TF-51D Mustangs (two-seat trainers) were used to train fighter pilots until the jet-trainers such as the T-33 Shooting Star were fully utilized.”

@ytn00b3 27 күн бұрын

WHy do T7A need two stabilizer wings? it only has single engine, this only adds to weight

@redkrawler Ай бұрын

Artificial intelligence will soon replace these pilots.

@amykuehnl8463 Ай бұрын

Drones

@billmccaleb7481 Ай бұрын

I heard the canopy will just depart the airframe at a whim.

@DDaoust429 29 күн бұрын

those were some choppy VR computers,, id never

@agoodlife2 Ай бұрын

Looks like a SAAB

@Georgi_Slavov79 2 сағат бұрын

And T-50

@slohn6025 Ай бұрын

What is the difference between an F5E and a T38 talon?

@mojoron Ай бұрын

Leading edge and hardpoints if I remember correctly

@MrRipper1956 24 күн бұрын

A T-38 is a two-seat advanced flight training aircraft with a later added capability for weapons to drop practice bombs. An F-5E was a single-seat adaptation of the T-38 with internal guns, external fuel, and bomb capability. The USAF and USN used the F-5s in the 1970-90s as adversary air for combat training against other aircraft. There was a 2 seat fighter version, the F-5F for conversion fighter training, and a proposed F-5G. That was a single-engine fighter proposal for a low-cost alternative to the F-16, renamed as the F-20.

@christiaancoetzee2964 10 күн бұрын

Did I see Boeing? Oops, big problem.

@cherchezlesoir7166 Ай бұрын

In fact it looks like an Alpha Jet of Dornier

@chadmtemple Ай бұрын

Looks like the BD-10

@ekuche8335 Ай бұрын

Why does the gear look sooooo messed up?!

@comitatus111 17 күн бұрын

Boeing, when it absolutely, doesn't have to to get there on time....or at all.

@user-dr6vs7ot3q Ай бұрын

Of all the air combat units through the years that contributed MUCH more than the "Tuskegee airmen" were "chosen" to be tributed with the red tail.they painted aircraft in that manner to indicate they were novice aviators to be avoided

@asquare9316 21 күн бұрын

T-7 Redhawk, it's been around for quite a while but production has been delayed. It is NOT new.

@Ali_Ercan Ай бұрын

👍

@christianklein5774 Ай бұрын

that is what i miss in europ i woud cancelk al compbat helicoper programs for a high end groundatac as multirollelight jetcraft , ...

@AccordGTR 29 күн бұрын

Boeing...oh great!

@waynebarnett7467 Ай бұрын

It’s a nice touch they painted some of the plane red …… be easier to find when they fall off mid flight.

@pokerEEUU 29 күн бұрын

🇵🇷PUR*EEUU🇺🇸I Prefer Tom Cat F-14... Or maibe..F16 XL..??🙄👆nice one..

@BudoReflex 21 күн бұрын

Boeing, lol. Wheels, doors, and whole aircraft falls automatically from the sky. Features asked for by shareholders.

@davidkim3215 Ай бұрын

T-7 is a major headache for USAF. Boeing has been doing wrong with this new aircraft. Production delayed twice already and this delay causes a lot of troubles within Air Force and Navy.

@robtriton 4 күн бұрын

Boeing? So it crashes on its own?!

@RuiLeTubo Ай бұрын

Boeing?! Oh no! Ruuunnn!!!

@jollyroger7624 5 күн бұрын

Where can I get one?

@FunnyOneFunnyOne Ай бұрын

Oof... Boeing, aye?

@mattfgln 28 күн бұрын

Manufacturing is so advanced that this plane is still not operational after 8 years 😂😂 and it’s only a trainer what a joke 😂😂

@jazzmandan7056 Ай бұрын

T7 for 🇨🇦

@jimmysmall3905 Ай бұрын

Wow! Are main gear from F-16?

@SkyhighStarlight Ай бұрын

From f35. Mostly electronic systems.

@Timbothruster-fh3cw 29 күн бұрын

@SkyhighStarlight The main gear is from the F-16!

@SkyhighStarlight 29 күн бұрын

@@Timbothruster-fh3cw Main gear you mean what? Like hydraulics, avionics or electronics?

@hkmp5kpdw 24 күн бұрын

Can you add a few more DEI comments into the video?

@problactive285 18 күн бұрын

Add deez to your chin.

@pruephillip1338 13 күн бұрын

Replacing the F16's! Really? Where are the hard points for missiles and such?

@user-kf5kq3bx2c Ай бұрын

🇺🇸😇🙏🕊️👍🦅💪

@user-fj1pk1xm3i Ай бұрын

❤

@mitchjohnson9240 Ай бұрын

Why don’t they just use the same jet trainer as the Navy and USMC?

@virusfreedo 29 күн бұрын

This is F 20 right

@JoseMartinez-pl6vb Ай бұрын

Just below supersonic speed…

@fingerprint8479 Ай бұрын

And still Americans lost all wars they fought since ww2... How come? 😂😂😂😂😂 How comic!

@user-ov5zm5rz3v Ай бұрын

Nor Boeing's,nor supersonic,nor US Air force.......

@augmanok131 8 күн бұрын

So is what I am hearing is Boeing can make great military aircraft, but cannot build a decent commercial airline passenger plane.

@amuktadir1991 Ай бұрын

THAT IS M NEWYORK CLASS AIRCRAFT CARRIER.AND RULE AND ORDER.3.1.Cost.2.1.each.Billion.

@carlosnavarro3725 Ай бұрын

Good for Boing, but if US Air Force tries Pampa III , this little piece of crap will be quickly forgotten.

@gevang4538 27 күн бұрын

AT 00:24 Maverick in Real life.

@Ghfvhvfg 6 күн бұрын

civilian possbilities?

@AlexanderRatz-xn9dx Ай бұрын

ach ja wie GT das es Werner gibt

@amykuehnl8463 Ай бұрын

AF isn't 100 years old

@andreaboaretto5609 Ай бұрын

for me....mb346

@grumpyoldfart3891 17 күн бұрын

If a plane has no doors, then doors won't fall off.

@lastsailor 27 күн бұрын

American "Tejas"