US Super Hornet Squadron With AIM-174B SM-6 vs Chinese J-15B Squadron (WarGames 228) | DCS

  Рет қаралды 27,942

Grim Reapers

Grim Reapers

Күн бұрын

AIM-174B + MAKO + LRASM Anti Ship: • AIM-174B (SM-6), LRASM...
AIM-174B (SM-6) Air to Air: • US Super Hornet Squadr...
AIM-174B (SM-6) Anti-AWACS: • Could US Air-Launched ...
AIM-174B (SM-6) Air to Ground: • Could Ukrainian F-16s ...
AIM-174B (SM-6) Anti Ship: • US Super Hornets With ...
With TWS's recent article showing a Super Hornet carrying a version of the ship-launched SM-6 naval missile, I run a simple squadron vs squadron aerial battle where the US aircraft use the SM-6 as a straight up Air to Air weapon.
Article: www.twz.com/sea/super-hornet-...
Mods: • Free DCS Mods (download links in the relevant video)
PATREON: / grimreapers
0:00 Overview
1:31 Scenario Details
3:46 Predictions
5:03 Battle
USEFUL LINKS
GRIM REAPERS (KZfaq): / @grimreapers
GRIM REAPERS 2 (KZfaq): / @grimreapers2
GR PODCASTS: anchor.fm/grim-reapers
DCS TUTORIALS: / @grimreapers
DCS BUYERS GUIDES: • DCS World Module Quick...
DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
MERCHANDISE: www.redbubble.com/people/grme...
PATREON monthly donations: / grimreapers
PAYPAL one-off donations: www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDona...
SOCIAL MEDIA
WEBSITE: grimreapers.net/
STREAM(Cap): / grimreaperscap
FACEBOOK: / grimreapersgroup
TWITTER: / grimreapers_
DISCORD: / discord
THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx
#WarGames #GRWarGames #SuperHornet #AIM174B #SM6 #AviationGaming #FlightSimulators #militaryhistory #DCS #DCSWORLD

Пікірлер: 196
@grimreapers
@grimreapers 19 күн бұрын
AIM-174B + MAKO + LRASM Anti Ship: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rsmHerSqm7PMdpc.html AIM-174B (SM-6) Air to Air: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hZ94Zrtkx6u1goU.html AIM-174B (SM-6) Anti-AWACS: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rKd_pM-Y3bKwY58.html AIM-174B (SM-6) Air to Ground: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rZxlnMqYtbqrh5s.html AIM-174B (SM-6) Anti Ship: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gp5znKaXuM7RXaM.html
@Musix4me-Clarinet
@Musix4me-Clarinet Ай бұрын
Lately, with your illnesses coming to the fore, it brings a smile to my heart when I click on the Grim Reapers video and here your voice, "Hello valued viewers. I hope you're all doing very well!" Thank you for your persistence and I wish you the best.
@stefanfluit8709
@stefanfluit8709 Ай бұрын
Yes, thank you so much!
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Roger doing my best.
@sidv4615
@sidv4615 Ай бұрын
what happened to cap? how'd you get to know?
@Musix4me-Clarinet
@Musix4me-Clarinet Ай бұрын
@@sidv4615 Well, a while back he had to deal with therapy for cancer (testicular, I believe, or something in that area). He seemed to have recovered, but has off-n-on illnesses (likely related) that he reports in comments during videos, and most recently, he posted a video about having something going on in neck/throat area. If you look back through the videos, it should only be about 7 or so back where he made an announcement about the latest.
@rokpertrovic940
@rokpertrovic940 Ай бұрын
What a silly video wrf 😂😂😂
@rre9121
@rre9121 Ай бұрын
It seems like a lot of money until you shitcan the entire enemy strike package for no losses. Spend money, not blood.
@bonedoc4556
@bonedoc4556 Ай бұрын
And they'd only need to fire a third of what they did to take them out so what, around 90 million to their 1 billion, entire squadron lost and beating a hasty retreat. Win win.
@herptek
@herptek 9 сағат бұрын
This is what pacifists often don't get. If it is not money during time of peace then it will be blood during times of war that is the cost. Defence budget works like insurance.
@haroldbenton979
@haroldbenton979 Ай бұрын
SM6 only weighs 3300 pounds 1500kgs and the F18 Super Hornet can carry 4k per underwing hard point as they are rated for the 500 gallon drop tanks which when full are 4k pounds
@jorehir
@jorehir Ай бұрын
Yeah, but it's not recommended to go full load if you want to go places. Or even take off. Good news is that SM-6 doesn't weigh that much without booster. Maybe less than 800 kg, which is equal to 5 AMRAAMs
@aqsunqar
@aqsunqar Ай бұрын
Per attention 1500 kg weight includes rocket booster. Without booster SM-6 or SM-2 Block IIIC weighs around 750 kg no more.
@hawkman302
@hawkman302 Ай бұрын
The super hornet also has a max weapon loadout of 17,750 lbs. which means, if they can carry 4 without being close to max.
@weasle2904
@weasle2904 5 күн бұрын
SM-6 weighs half that much
@Musix4me-Clarinet
@Musix4me-Clarinet Ай бұрын
Okay. B-21s loaded with SM-6s. *_"Fck your Air Force."_*
@DefaultProphet
@DefaultProphet Ай бұрын
Seriously stealth missile truck go brrrrrrr with a rotary launcher
@dobster5819
@dobster5819 Ай бұрын
This would be fun, hope your doing well Cap.
@danconway660
@danconway660 Ай бұрын
Figure if the B-21's payload ends up around 40,000lbs, that means about 12 SM-6 missiles... So a flight of 5 Raiders could launch the same # of missiles and hit a mix of air and ground targets... absolutely insane.
@ShootBlueHelmets
@ShootBlueHelmets Ай бұрын
I used to use B-2 with Phoenix in Jane's ATF back in the day. It allowed such things. Quite effective.
@ObiWanShinobi917
@ObiWanShinobi917 Ай бұрын
That sounds like a terrifying nightmare to have as a Chinese pilot Oh wait. It isn't a nightmare. The air launched SM-6 is REAL 😂
@dwarvensmith80
@dwarvensmith80 Ай бұрын
They went "AEGIS big RED fire everything" button
@timotakaluoma5613
@timotakaluoma5613 Ай бұрын
Hi Grim Reapers, please do scenario Finnish Air Force F-18 vs. Russian Northern fleet avaition, since there is beautiful map of north Fin/Nor/Swe, maybe add to the mix some Swe AF Gripens and Norwegian F-35s. Cheers!
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
OK
@kreidefelsen
@kreidefelsen Ай бұрын
@@grimreapers 👍
@trentvlak
@trentvlak Ай бұрын
"wiped them all out with room to spare" heck yeah. SM6 rules.
@SmilingCamperVan-dd8cb
@SmilingCamperVan-dd8cb Ай бұрын
Always a pleasure seeing Grim Reapers naval fights. I am absolutely craving more Super Tomcat content, especially against Super Bogs.
@pike100
@pike100 Ай бұрын
Tomcats fighting Super Hornets? Noooo! No blue on blue battles.
@HT-Blindleader
@HT-Blindleader Ай бұрын
Me thinks Dark might have installed the "fire everything" button from an AB.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Yarp.
@totalNERD-eo7wx
@totalNERD-eo7wx Ай бұрын
Now try this against Su-35s with R-37Ms, please!
@totalNERD-eo7wx
@totalNERD-eo7wx Ай бұрын
@@patrickwoxen3894 What do you mean? Both are 4th gen
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Roger, that will be a good fight actually.
@patrickwoxen3894
@patrickwoxen3894 Ай бұрын
@@totalNERD-eo7wx seems like my brain was in the toilet when i wrote that comment lmao
@totalNERD-eo7wx
@totalNERD-eo7wx Ай бұрын
@@patrickwoxen3894 fair
@MrNakedweasel
@MrNakedweasel Ай бұрын
I very much appreciate how connected you are to current events and contemporary warfare developments. I have been a quite vocal proponent of this concept for almost 10 years.
@shannonfracisco4074
@shannonfracisco4074 Ай бұрын
Have you tried this with F-15 EX yet? Please?!
@totalNERD-eo7wx
@totalNERD-eo7wx Ай бұрын
Yes, when they did the AWACS snipe video
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Air Launched SM-6 vs AWACS: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rKd_pM-Y3bKwY58.html Air Launched SM-6 vs Moscow: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rZxlnMqYtbqrh5s.html PL-17 vs AWACS: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mdpjYLqVy5qYfI0.html
@FleetDefenderRA5
@FleetDefenderRA5 Ай бұрын
Thank you; I learn a lot from watching these. Thank you!
@Raptor1970
@Raptor1970 Ай бұрын
Reminiscent of the phoenix tests….massive missile, massive range and devastating.
@grav4315
@grav4315 Ай бұрын
Man I really hope DCS has fixed its target de-confliction problem.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Agreed
@cuz129
@cuz129 Ай бұрын
This content is unmatched in quality and creativity. Your whole team is greatly appreciated by us, your fans!
@ctaviationvideos4926
@ctaviationvideos4926 Ай бұрын
Interesting that the F/A-18 being shown at the beginning has the CAG colors of the electronic warfare squadron that flies the E/A-18G Growler. Overall very interesting and cool video, there’s so much that can be done with DCS
@DefaultProphet
@DefaultProphet Ай бұрын
Wut. They’re really just trying all the things now huh? PAC3 in VLS, SM6 in A2A, wild stuff
@emfournet
@emfournet Ай бұрын
My favorite question! Great stuff.
@ricardomartinez1871
@ricardomartinez1871 Ай бұрын
Good to hear you Cap!!!
@ObiWanShinobi917
@ObiWanShinobi917 Ай бұрын
America deciding to use the SM-6 as an air launched missile is China's worst nightmare. The one slight advantage China had (until the D-3 is in full production and operation) just got obliterated, and now China themselves are hopelessly outranged by American fighters. The worst part is that we don't have a lot of AMRAAM D-3 missles yet, but the U.S. has thousands of SM-6s. The one thing China had going for them. Ripped away. Its hopeless now ❤ Edit: I just thought of something even cooler. Hear me out lads: Rapid Dragon But with SM-6
@AmirShafeek
@AmirShafeek Ай бұрын
That only matters if the Americans can get theirs carriers close enough to launch there fixed wing aviation.
@hughmungus2760
@hughmungus2760 Ай бұрын
these can't be carried internally on stealth aircraft and are so heavy you'll be lucky to carry 2 per plane and still have enough room for fuel tanks which you'd still need for your fighters to be at all useful.
@Humblebeginningsfarmstead
@Humblebeginningsfarmstead Ай бұрын
Can't wait to play this game. After watching all your videos, I ordered myself a win-wing f18 Orion system. It's going on to a full motion rig with a 49-in monitor and a 4K VR headset
@hunterwyeth
@hunterwyeth Ай бұрын
I was hoping you’d cover this!
@deterdettol
@deterdettol Ай бұрын
Hello valued Cap, I hope you’re doing very well.
@MM22966
@MM22966 17 күн бұрын
Putting in a vote now: AIM-174 needs to be called "Phoenix II".
@tanksoldier
@tanksoldier Ай бұрын
The F18s should have gone cold after firing, and might have been able to fire cold using data from AWACS. The Chinese might never have a target at all. Try it with Chinese and US stealth fighters.
@nealfryling619
@nealfryling619 Ай бұрын
Cap, with 16s due any day now, it would be interesting to see: Present state blues vs red glide bomb run: 1). Can blues intercept and deter red glide bomb run with what they (currently) have? (Probably not!) 2). Can blues intercept and deter red glide bomb run with the 16s they’re about to get? (Maybe?) 3). If blues can win “2).”, can blues strike a red air base? I’d posit that the blues degradation of the red AWACS and air defense etc. would make these somewhat plausible…, to spice it up, on “3).”, a blue strategy may need to simultaneously strike a thin red air defense… ( overlapping threat rings are probably stretched, ie s300/400 mutual support is probably less ideal than it would have been because of the blue’s consistent strikes against such assets) Love these videos! Get well soon!
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/e9CTosJ4y7bTnI0.html
@Jeffrey.1978
@Jeffrey.1978 Ай бұрын
@grimreapers - Thanks again for the video! Sounds like your voice is holding up, Cap. I hope you are doing better.
@captainfoxythepiratefox8874
@captainfoxythepiratefox8874 Ай бұрын
Did we find the new replacement for the AIM-54C Phoenix? New Tomcat when? Lol love your videos Cap cant wait to see these in a war game.
@Wyomingchief
@Wyomingchief Ай бұрын
The aim 260s coming out, actually should be reaching the fleet soon if not already. And the F-14 Tomcat is an old analog fighter that has seen its Day come and go
@mavrikmavrik3032
@mavrikmavrik3032 Ай бұрын
That was impressive.
@WW-zj6bj
@WW-zj6bj Ай бұрын
Flawless victory.
@petertyson4022
@petertyson4022 Ай бұрын
Am only learning about modain missiles from this channel. 👽👍
@themuaddib
@themuaddib 14 күн бұрын
It's not the plane. It's the missile.
@Lyndonberg_Gaming
@Lyndonberg_Gaming Ай бұрын
Could the fire everything be from the launch cadence if you ripped them off the ships
@CRAZYHORSE19682003
@CRAZYHORSE19682003 Ай бұрын
The Navy is also integrating the Patriot PAC-3 into the MK-41 and MK-57 VLS system. The advantages to that is they can QUAD pack the PAC-3 in a single MK-41 VLS cell compared to just one SM-6 Or SM-3ER. This could over the Navy a quantum leap in capability and missiles carried. The PAC-3 is also quite a bit less expensive so they can save the Standard Missiles for more high value targets.
@hughmungus2760
@hughmungus2760 Ай бұрын
now comes the production problem. Pac3s are being drained at a conspicuous rate in ukraine and are already running dangerously low on stock. They're only produced in the hundreds per year and get used up in the dozens every time Russia does a missile salvo.
@nevisstkitts8264
@nevisstkitts8264 Ай бұрын
1:08 "primarily a naval missile" ... and the F-18 is a naval strike and naval air superiority aircraft
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
lol yes.
@pierreaudiffred3703
@pierreaudiffred3703 11 күн бұрын
Yeah, a B-21 filled up with these would be basically unstoppable.
@loucyphers_nightmare
@loucyphers_nightmare 12 күн бұрын
The AIM 174B (Sm-6) is already in theater
@shveylien7401
@shveylien7401 Ай бұрын
What if you put a small JDAM on the end of a large discarding solid fuel rocket and made a weird HIMARS?
@SmilingCamperVan-dd8cb
@SmilingCamperVan-dd8cb Ай бұрын
I wonder how the Super Bogs would fare if the naval Flanker was equipped with the PL-17?
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
The way we have everything set up, it would be about even.
@SmilingCamperVan-dd8cb
@SmilingCamperVan-dd8cb Ай бұрын
@@grimreapers Cool, keep up the great work!
@Anarchy_420
@Anarchy_420 Ай бұрын
Yo Cap Futuristic, Hypersonic, and Stealth battle!🙏 The Boy's and Yourself are in F/A-XX's starting airborn with AIM-260's and AI HAVE GLASS F-16 Loyal Wingman! They are representing smaller aircraft and maintain low observable by either having 4 Peregrine's plus 2 AIM-9X or 2 AIM-120D's plus 2 AIM-9X! Ford Class Carrier with few F/A-XX's with AIM-260's however mostly F-35's with Mako's! LHD carrying F-35's with AIM-260's! 2 Arleigh Burke's, 2 Ticonderoga's, and 1 Constellation Class! 2 SR-72's with AGM-183's! 3 B-21's with JASSM-ER's! Opposition! off the coast 2 Type 055's, on the coast DF-26's, protecting them and an Airbase near the coast HQ-9, S-350, and S-400! The Airbase has SU-57's with R-77M's, SU-35's with couple R-37M's and R-77M's, and MIG-31's some with R-37M's and some with Kinzhal's! Inside/further protection for Airbase, Iglas, Tunguska's, and Pantsir's! To the south away from the action Carrier with J-35's with PL-15's and 1 Type 055 for protection! Finally further inland away from the action small Airfield with J-20's with PL-15's and few J-15's with PL-17's! Mission-- as stated The Boy's and Yourself are responsible for air superiority with immediate help from the F-35's on the LHD, however Ford Carrier will launch F-35's with Mako first then the few F/A-XX's will launch as last support/clean up! The Mako F-35's are tasked with taking out ALL air defenses! Before that The 2 SR-72's are tasked with hitting the 2 Type 055's off the coast! B-21's are tasked with taking out all DF-ZF's! Optional last strike, Tomahawks from the Ships (if any survive;) smash Airfield!👍
@Wyomingchief
@Wyomingchief Ай бұрын
Yeah do you have a server that can support that many units😂😂 I think if you watch enough videos from Junior you'll realize that server capabilities tend to limit how big they can make their recreations.
@richardluck6054
@richardluck6054 Ай бұрын
B!, B2, or B21 loaded with SM-6 and used in sniping mode. Loiter time and low observability!
@swayzefan3600
@swayzefan3600 21 күн бұрын
SM-6 on super hornets would make a great quick reaction anti-ship missile as well.
@CRAZYHORSE19682003
@CRAZYHORSE19682003 Ай бұрын
Imagine if the outfit C-17's with rapid dragon crates of SM-6's flying in support of F-18's.
@togoso
@togoso Ай бұрын
Could you image a C-5 Galaxy with however many of these just flying around, chucking them out when needed. Crazy
@hughmungus2760
@hughmungus2760 Ай бұрын
At that point china converts its DF series missiles with radar seekers and produces the world's first intermediate range anti-aircraft ballistic missile. Or programs its WZ8 hypersonic drones to into an air to air kamikazi.
@lenn55
@lenn55 Ай бұрын
I would think since the SM-6 is so expensive ande so few would be purchased for air-to-air roles it would be reserved for high value targets like Russian/Chinese AWACS, Recon, heavy bombers, ect. Kinda like a modern day Phoenix missile but even more expensive.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Agreed.
@johnsilver9338
@johnsilver9338 Ай бұрын
That's what Raytheon's LREW and Boeing's LRAAM are for. SM-6 may just be an interim solution before those go operational.
@Wyomingchief
@Wyomingchief Ай бұрын
​@@johnsilver9338yep you nailed it
@HalfLifeExpert1
@HalfLifeExpert1 19 күн бұрын
With this missile we finally have the true successor to the F-14 if you load 4x of these onto a Super Hornet
@damienhealy6590
@damienhealy6590 21 күн бұрын
The F-18E/G Super Hornet's are one of the best multi role fighters you will see/ use. You guys will love it!
@user-en8dk9fh6o
@user-en8dk9fh6o Ай бұрын
Where to get a link to this mod?
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Mods: kzfaq.info/sun/PL3kOAM2N1YJcbzwU5FCo0DRmCdF3owO1o (download links in the relevant video)
@marinuslubbe3993
@marinuslubbe3993 Ай бұрын
I recall you have PL-17 modeled and used it in a video. Why not give J15s PL-17s ? Then it would be fair.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Yup, I guess I could do that, but TBH I wasn't really wanting a fair fight.
@Zalthook5048
@Zalthook5048 Ай бұрын
Wweeee!
@anngo4140
@anngo4140 20 күн бұрын
They're calling it the AIM174 now too I think, I mean still testing and all.
@WWCephas
@WWCephas 12 күн бұрын
We need the new LRAAM missile simulated with its late-stage booster giving it great terminal performance.
@heirofcarthage3368
@heirofcarthage3368 Ай бұрын
Yes!!!!
@samuellord8576
@samuellord8576 Ай бұрын
Hey Cap, Always use about 660mph for Mach 1 above 11km altitude! STP (sea level at 25deg C) Mach 1 speed is about 761mph, and is _incorrect_ for higher altitudes. Mach speeds decrease with altitude until around 11km, when they roughly settle at ~660. So the closing speed of the first SM6 (1900kts IIRC) was a tad above Mach 3. Thanks!
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
I've always just divided the number by 700 to keep it simple. But I do see your point.
@MaxQ2989
@MaxQ2989 16 күн бұрын
You keep using 200 miles…that’s the range of the AIM 260. This AIM/SM6 is closer to 400. With AWACs or F35 support
@sp00f64
@sp00f64 Ай бұрын
If you could put 2 SM-6 on an F-16 or F-15 and launch at mach 2, would/could you get any more range etc, as assumed? (F-18 mach 1.6)
@ArizonaAstraLLC
@ArizonaAstraLLC 28 күн бұрын
PLAAF been real quiet since this vid dropped from GR
@seanmataya2290
@seanmataya2290 Ай бұрын
What happens against the Blackbird?
@freddiejohames8332
@freddiejohames8332 Ай бұрын
i find it quite funny how once the hornet fired one it was lopsided in the air.
@stug77
@stug77 Ай бұрын
Are these better than AIM-54 Mk 60? Can we see a tomcat firing SM-6?
@user-sz4hg1zx3v
@user-sz4hg1zx3v Ай бұрын
They said yolo with the sm6s
@tanksoldier
@tanksoldier Ай бұрын
You made a point in the Israeli anti-drone mission that one side could use inexpensive threats to force their opponent to use expensive defenses, thus making the war too expensive to prosecute and forcing concessions without actually winning. The expense of the SM6 reminds me of that.
@wolfgangamadeus1246
@wolfgangamadeus1246 Ай бұрын
Google tells me that a J-15 is 61 million a copy. The loss of 16 J15s is then 976 million at the cost of 279 million in missiles and no loss of any F-18s, and in a real situation they would not fire all of the missiles like the AI did. Also given the added fact that the J-15s are probably not replaceable in less than 6 months (highly optimistic), the SM-6's seem very cost effective.
@johnsilver9338
@johnsilver9338 Ай бұрын
That's what Raytheon's LREW and Boeing's LRAAM are for. SM-6 may just be an interim solution before those go operational.
@wolfgangamadeus1246
@wolfgangamadeus1246 Ай бұрын
@@johnsilver9338 There is an old saying: "One operationally certified missile that actually works is worth two in development." :)
@hughmungus2760
@hughmungus2760 Ай бұрын
@@wolfgangamadeus1246 china operates an extensive fleet of drone fighters based off ancient J6s If they're mixed in with J15s and used as a meat shield that could easily balance out the equation.
@EWElife0313
@EWElife0313 Ай бұрын
The rate of missiles firing theory: The simulator is following the same doctrine as naval SAM SM-6s. (Blanket defense) You would probably have to change something in the programing to have it follow the parameters of a standard air to air missile. (Choosing its target)
@Wyomingchief
@Wyomingchief Ай бұрын
No because the aircraft mod just treats the sm-6 as a standard air-to-air missile. The programming from the ships firing sm-6 missiles is completely different than what the aircraft mods use
@andrewjohnson6162
@andrewjohnson6162 Ай бұрын
You could try this with 1xSm6 on each aircraft and AWC visible. I say AWC visible so the supers could go after that to.
@geraltofrivia8529
@geraltofrivia8529 Ай бұрын
"Thats 20 out or 1/4 of a billion dollars" or 1/10 yearly production.
@winelive5500
@winelive5500 Ай бұрын
I have wondered if the Ukrainians had trialed using a s300 missile from their old jets or even an AN26 (icbm launch style) against those awacs as they must have a huge range if fired high and fast
@totalNERD-eo7wx
@totalNERD-eo7wx Ай бұрын
No, S300 is Way too big for anything that isn't a bomber
@atomf9143
@atomf9143 Ай бұрын
S-300 missiles are much too big to be carried by a fighter, not to mention the compatibility issues. The prevailing theory is that they used an S-200 or Patriot for the first AWACs shootdown, and that the second was friendly fire from a local Russian battery.
@Likeaworm
@Likeaworm Ай бұрын
Those missiles are the size of telephone poles but I like your thinking
@atomf9143
@atomf9143 Ай бұрын
@@Likeaworm S-300? Bigger than that.
@notsureyou
@notsureyou Ай бұрын
The mass and length is similar to the RIM-161 just saying, you might want to use a Strike Eagle (from memory that has the better radar of the F15's) 🤷‍♂😂😂😂😂
@zlayo_cro
@zlayo_cro Ай бұрын
Why wouldn't the missile be able to go faster than Mach 4 when launched from high altitude? It can go almost Mach 4 when launched from a ship, starting from altitude 0 and speed 0. so one would think it could reach a higher speed when launched from close to Mach 1 at 40k feet.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Maybe, I'm not sure TBH.
@hughmungus2760
@hughmungus2760 Ай бұрын
maybe the seekers and control surfaces aren't designed to handle hypersonic speeds. Missile might literally start melting
@Thewhitetile
@Thewhitetile Ай бұрын
When you fire a heavier missile it doesnt lose as much speed when it comes down from the loft.
@jimreynolds2837
@jimreynolds2837 Ай бұрын
Wouldn’t the SuperHornets stay outside of the PL-15 range and never get fired upon since they out range J-15 by roughly 100 miles?
@hughmungus2760
@hughmungus2760 Ай бұрын
can't detect the targets? in real life you'd never want your AWACs to be on the first line of defense.
@valuedhumanoid6574
@valuedhumanoid6574 Ай бұрын
Didn't the British try something like this with their Sea Dart SAM? I was in the USN from 1986 to 90 and ran many NATO exercises and I remember preparing target drones for a NATO shoot-ex where they were firing Sea Darts that were guided by surface radar from a Type 82 destroyer. Like a buddy lase. I remember the event but it's been so long ago I can't remember the details, like what aircraft was the launch platform. Oh well, that's what Wiki is for! I will try to find something about this if it was even a thing.
@terencyowens9491
@terencyowens9491 Ай бұрын
This, but with B-1b loaded with SM-6s and meteor.
@notsureyou
@notsureyou Ай бұрын
I'd use the RIM-161... go big or go home 🤷‍♂😂
@corvanphoenix
@corvanphoenix Ай бұрын
The PK is going to be much better for a Mach 2.5 terminal speed than a Mach 1.5. The target just doesn't have the time to do much to lose the missile.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Yarp.
@hughmungus2760
@hughmungus2760 Ай бұрын
since you're doing ultra long range air to air missiles, why not equip the J15s with the PL17?
@aarya_gaming9606
@aarya_gaming9606 Ай бұрын
Try the Chinese J-16s with PL-17 missile too, it may be a closer battle. And also maybe let yhr Chinese have a near full or full loadout, having them at half payload is kinda unfair.
@TheStormpilgrim
@TheStormpilgrim Ай бұрын
Chinese commander: "Stay at least 150 miles from naval ships to remain out of range of those SM-6s." American commander: "Yeah, you do that. Stay away from those SM-6s. (chuckle)" F-18 pilots from 200 miles: "Say hello to my little friends!"
@Zalthook5048
@Zalthook5048 Ай бұрын
Omg do it with the B-1R lol.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
ooo nice.
@TreldarForPresident
@TreldarForPresident Ай бұрын
Assuming the deconfliction goes perfectly AND you hit all targets, F/A-18's only have to shoot 16 SM-6's at a taxpayer cost of $69,600,000 (nice) and then they can just immediately go defensive, while the chinese side would eventually lose $1,054,675,000. That's an insane cost efficiency even if each individual missile is outrageously expensive.
@johnaikema1055
@johnaikema1055 Ай бұрын
cost of the missiles vs cost of airframes destroyed= viable, yet rather silly.
@Wyomingchief
@Wyomingchief Ай бұрын
Yeah the cost of the missiles are way cheaper than the cost of the aircraft taken out. Not silly at all in fact it's very cost-effective, especially if they really do have it in service as a stopgap measure until some of the new Raytheon missiles reach the fleet
@svenskdod
@svenskdod Ай бұрын
Still, 278k but took out a billion worth of hardware.
@AEFisch
@AEFisch Ай бұрын
Not so unrealistic as the Navy is using F35c under stealth to be forward air controller for FA18's carrying the weapon. Don't think a SM-6 is in use but no one is saying how they are employing this strategy. To take out a hi value target instead of a fighter....
@Wyomingchief
@Wyomingchief Ай бұрын
The sm-6 is very much in service and in use and as he said at the beginning of the video they've already spotted f-18s carrying them so yeah I would say if they're not in use they're pretty close to being able to do it if not already
@CaptainSpacedOut
@CaptainSpacedOut Ай бұрын
R-37M vs SM-6?
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Agreed.
@jamison884
@jamison884 Ай бұрын
Thanks for the video Cap! A couple thoughts. First, given the general capability of SM-6 and the expansion of missions (more are needed for VLS cells, more are needed for the US Army Tphon launchers, and more are needed for other services looking to use them as general anti-surface, anti-ship, and anti-air missiles), they just need to boost the hell out of manufacturing. 500% production please! It really is a wonder-missile of sorts, given the range/speed/sensors and the fact it can be used for any mission basically. I think they also have a greater range given the distance they travelled after impact and the engagement speed. Is it a limit of DCS code, AWACS range, missile battery life? I'm curious to know. I'd also really like to see if it's possible to find whatever code is resulting in all missiles being fired and correcting that so they fire one per target. Finally, it does appear to be overkill, as the missile is ridiculously large and heavy, plus expensive. A middle ground between SM-6 and AIM-120D (and even AIM-260) would be ideal. Would you be able to modify this SM-6 missile into an SM-2 variant to see how that would do in a test, since we have many more SM-2 missiles in the inventory? I believe the latest variants all have active radar guidance. Thanks again Cap!
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
TBH I just made the rough calculation of 210 miles in my head and asked Dark to make that. We could probably get 250 miles, but not sure until we try it.
@johnsilver9338
@johnsilver9338 Ай бұрын
That's what Raytheon's LREW and Boeing's LRAAM are for. SM-6 may just be an interim solution before those go operational.
@newbievonnewberson7390
@newbievonnewberson7390 Ай бұрын
I've wathed a ton of these vids, and I'm obviously missing something. WTF is with the Hornets being called "bogs?"
@bohan9957
@bohan9957 Ай бұрын
If you give Super Hornets SM-6s, shouldn't the J-15Bs get PL-21s?
@Anarchy_420
@Anarchy_420 Ай бұрын
PL-17?
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mdpjYLqVy5qYfI0.html
@Anarchy_420
@Anarchy_420 Ай бұрын
@@grimreapers was thinking SM-6 VS PL-17;)
@doubleaplays8450
@doubleaplays8450 Ай бұрын
Why Don't the Hornets crank or go cold after they shoot
@Wyomingchief
@Wyomingchief Ай бұрын
Because it's DCS and the core programming for the AI Fighters kind of does what it wants to do. You got to remember gr is making DCS to do things that it's not really intended to do LOL😂
@ShootBlueHelmets
@ShootBlueHelmets Ай бұрын
Okay, Cap, once more for measure. I tried to hint to you while keeping things a bit of a hint. I guess i could not get your, nor busy CH's attention. I have since discovered that the ideas I have had are not completely novel, so I will let it out here in hopes CH is willing and that modeling such here would inspire its reality. I had some ideas for modernizing battleships. I heard sonce that adding VLS was considered on BBs in the 80s, but I am unsure if they envisioned everything the way that I have. Remove the main gun turrets completely! My calculations put about 1,000+ x 22' boxes in 1 and 2 barbettes and 500+ 25-foot strike boxes in #2. That doesn’t even include updates for the 5" gun slots and decking. Modification of 4 Iowa Class dreadnaughts as such would cover all CG in the Pacific, and provive an offensive capabilities with equal might. Imagine 1,600 plus SM-3, SM-6, etc, plus plus plus. Are you paying attention yet?! The BB are in game, as are the missiles. This is literally the most needed mod that could be made to affect a possible real world, needed thing to become real. It could literally save thousands of lives FFS. Thanks.
@Wyomingchief
@Wyomingchief Ай бұрын
Yeah they actually did look at that back in the late eighties and again in the 90s before they completely decommissioned the Iowa class. I think if you go to the New Jersey Battleship KZfaq page, they may have done a video about it? Or maybe it was Dranchfil(sp?) Who did a video on it also. But the short of it was, it was not feasible without massive reconstruction of those ships, and it would have been far cheaper to literally try to build a new battleship instead. Which obviously would be a waste of money because you can build enough frigates and Burke class destroyers to more than makeup for the amount of missiles they could get on an Iowa, and do it cheaper. Part of the problems are, those barrettes that the turrets sedan or too small to put an adequate amount of VLS tubes in, without completely ripping them out which then gets into issues of structural weakness. And they did look at it in multiple configurations. Doing it only with turret number 3 or all three of the turrets and maybe one other configuration.. Also you couldn't do anything with the 5 inch mounts or the place where the 5-inch mounts were located. I believe they had already removed part of them during the refit to make room for other equipment including the Box launchers. Also those turrets set on a very small barbet, that would be functionally useless without tearing them completely out. And one of the Least Complicated part is you would literally have to rip up most of the decking on the battleship because they had teak, wooden, coverings on their steel decks Again it's a very cool idea and I know a lot of people are absolutely fascinated and would love if we still had Iowa-class battleships in the inventory. But their day has long passed, there's no Financial feasible way to get any use out of them at this point in time. I mean seriously you literally have to gut the ship down to the hull, and again it would be cheaper just to build a new one. Which would still be way too expensive
@danieljones7843
@danieljones7843 13 күн бұрын
Downside: expensive Upside: US navy pilots score kills while back on the carrier snoring in their bunks…
@kangaroohybrid5633
@kangaroohybrid5633 Ай бұрын
Hello Boys....I see the French are sending Mirage 2000 to Ukraine. Could you please do some scenarios using the Mirage please, thanks
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
Mirage 2000D vs Russian SAMs: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/b5OAlsyQ3L3Xdn0.html
@stevenmiller184
@stevenmiller184 Ай бұрын
Why don't the Hornets turn around as soon as they've launched their missiles? The Chinese would never get a lock or fire their missiles.
@voidtempering8700
@voidtempering8700 Ай бұрын
DCS doesn't work like that.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
It's just difficult to get them to turn quickly. They kinda do it when they want to.
@rickjames18
@rickjames18 Ай бұрын
If the Navy can get the SM-6 working for long range Air to Air that would be huge IMO. Especially with all the threats and CCP aggression in the Pacific.
@Wyomingchief
@Wyomingchief Ай бұрын
Oh I'm sure it's quite capable of being used right now. But again it's just a stopgap measure Intel the new Raytheon come online within the next year or two
@rickjames18
@rickjames18 Ай бұрын
@@Wyomingchief You mean the 260? I wonder if they could use the SM-6 as a long range AWAC interceptor? Maybe the SM-6 has more range but who knows..
@TheSithTeacher
@TheSithTeacher 21 күн бұрын
Raytheon is making money while taxpayers are loosing it
@bpop2148
@bpop2148 19 күн бұрын
That is indeed how it works
@jude431
@jude431 18 күн бұрын
simon whistler
@barneyklingenberg4078
@barneyklingenberg4078 Ай бұрын
I think it just shows AI is stupid. When the AWACS operators detect 16 planes and 64 missiles launched at 200 miles. They know the bogeys are probably out of ordnance. So break contact get some distance let the missiles tyre out. and try to go back in. Worst case the Americans wasted loads of munitions.
@Utubesuperstar
@Utubesuperstar Ай бұрын
The Chinese shouldn’t have ever had a chance to fire since the awacs is targeting and guiding the second the hornets fired they should have gone fully cold
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Ай бұрын
True, but it's never that easy to do.
@Wyomingchief
@Wyomingchief Ай бұрын
DCS core programming controls the AI aircraft and what the awacs is doing with the missiles. And they do what they want. Which is kind of a nice way of saying that cap is making the DCS programming for the AI do things that it's really not intended to do in the first place😂😂
@Utubesuperstar
@Utubesuperstar Ай бұрын
@@Wyomingchief no i know that and completely agree, but it does bear saying in the conclusions and during the mission that china even getting a shot off would be an impossibility if dcs was operating realistically
@donkeysunited
@donkeysunited Ай бұрын
AIM-260: 200 km range Air-launched SM-6: ?? range (estimated at 320 km range for this video) PL-15: 200 - 300 km range PL-21: 300 - 400 km range PL-17: 400 km range (250 miles) Russian R-37M: 300 - 400 km range China and Russia have access to missiles that can compete with the SM-6 but they're all intended for shooting down AWACS and refuelers so it's unlikely they'd be chucking large numbers of them against fighters.
@Wyomingchief
@Wyomingchief Ай бұрын
Yeah don't get enamored with Russian propaganda along with the chinese. They really tend to over-promise and under deliver quite frequently😂😂 And yeah good luck getting any new advances out of Russia until they can figure out how to modernize their t-34s😂
@sequwlm9904
@sequwlm9904 Ай бұрын
I think the PL17 would be a better comparison
F-15EX With AIM-174B vs J-15 With PL-17 (WarGames 233) | DCS
32:42
Grim Reapers
Рет қаралды 30 М.
MISS CIRCLE STUDENTS BULLY ME!
00:12
Andreas Eskander
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
아이스크림으로 체감되는 요즘 물가
00:16
진영민yeongmin
Рет қаралды 60 МЛН
USA vs China: To Sink a Carrier
31:30
HypOps
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
The F/A-18 Hornet: Unsexy but Unmatched
20:56
Megaprojects
Рет қаралды 585 М.
The F-35 in Gaming
25:13
Mimiaga
Рет қаралды 70 М.
New Recipe for Pi - Numberphile
14:29
Numberphile
Рет қаралды 286 М.
Pilot Refuses to Land
17:49
74 Gear
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
Rolling Thunder - 94 Thunderchiefs Attack the Dragon's Jaw Bridge, 1965
18:12
The Operations Room
Рет қаралды 324 М.
skibidi toilet 76 (part 2)
4:28
DaFuq!?Boom!
Рет қаралды 16 МЛН