Steve Knott, Army War College, discusses how and why Confederate Maj. Gen. J.E.B. Stuart ended up in Carlisle while the rest of the Confederates were converging on Gettysburg.
Пікірлер: 862
@Skerdy7 жыл бұрын
This might be the best lecture I've ever seen... this guy not only knows how to tell a story, but you can feel his passion.
@mindbomb9341Ай бұрын
I agree completely!
@matthewdimeola75405 ай бұрын
I always wondered why Stuart did not play a bigger role at Gettysburg, the details of the story are amazing! Great Job!
@atpg52 ай бұрын
Trump "WOW"
@no-barknoonan1335Ай бұрын
@@atpg5What does your politician of choice have to do with J.E.B. Stuart and Gettysburg?
@atpg5Ай бұрын
@@no-barknoonan1335 Trump "Wow just WoW"
@McNair39thNCАй бұрын
@@no-barknoonan1335 you know how those Trump fart sniffers are, they just randomly say shit! 🤣
@daveycrocket48732 ай бұрын
The guy with the camera is excellent at keeping the camera on his smiling face. But is extremely terrible showing us what he's talking about on the big screen.
@7936BarryАй бұрын
As an experienced camera person I noticed this right away. An expert single-camera shooter in this situation would show the viewer what the speaker was talking about once it became clear the viewer would want to see it for himself... perhaps even keeping the speaker in the frame, but not necessarily if close-ups were needed. There's a chance the camera person expected the maps and drawings would be edited in later to show what he failed to show. Otherwise push in to show the maps, pull back when you had a good look and could understand what was being spoken about. It takes awhile to develop the instinct of what to do when you're running a one-camera setup.
@danielaggeler92632 ай бұрын
Thank you Mr. Knott, this is as complete and understandable an explanation of the whole of this battle that is not covered in any literature or media sources I have seen. I am more informed about this topic than before.
@michaelknight40413 ай бұрын
I knew a guy whos name was JB Stuart. On his driver's license application he wrote his name as "J" only "B" only Stuart but when he got his license it said Jonly Bonly Stuart.
@realmikesallyАй бұрын
Excellent lecture! At once educational and highly entertaining. Thank you!
@mindbomb9341Ай бұрын
Amazing talk and energy Mr. Knott!!!! The only tragedy here is that I can't find the part of the talk by Dr. Sommers. :( And there isn't enough of you on KZfaq either Mr. Knott.
@philipstanton15973 ай бұрын
I really love this lecture. I'd like to hear more from Capt Steven W Knott, but I can only find lectures by Dr Steven F Knott, a different historian. Anyone know where I can find more?
@ty98843 ай бұрын
Me, too. I'm a fan.
@jazzjackson98753 ай бұрын
I’m sorry…. I do Knott
@ty98843 ай бұрын
@@jazzjackson9875 Go sit in the corner and think about what you said.
@danmeehan1390Ай бұрын
Brilliant presentation.
@robertallen7186Ай бұрын
Great presentation, but I wish the camera operator had shown the slides when he referred to them.....
@user-ff2kz8cs3u2 ай бұрын
This is pure gold!
@Lizerator3 ай бұрын
So interesting!
@cjduhaime882 ай бұрын
I was referring to the " Lincoln genocide" remark. Otherwise, this presentation was superb!
@McNair39thNCАй бұрын
I take that back 15 minutes into a 30 minute talk. He’s just now getting to JEB Stuart 😂😂
@DavidRamirez-ww5kv7 жыл бұрын
I have heard several lectures on the Gettysburg Campaign. This is the best and most pragmatic assessment of the events leading up to the Battle of Gettysburg I have heard. Very insightful, I wish I could heard the full presentation. As a student of history, This man knows what he is talking about.
@karlburkhalter15026 жыл бұрын
David Ramirez he is a clueless dweeb. Has no clue about cavalry mission or method.
@A1Authority6 жыл бұрын
*HEADS UP CIVIL WAR HISTORIANS!* As of this notification, see what *WIKIPEDIA* has posted as a Confederate Flag!!! It's an SJW nightmare, and you have reason to hound them, big-time! For those of us who hold the lives and the reasons the war was fought as sacred or worthy of respect, this is proof that WIKIPEDIA is a biased, unreliable, history-bending pile of shit. *Rally, men and sisters of the cause!* A wrong needs righting!!!
@lordprivateer49656 жыл бұрын
Could you explain further?
@kvltizt5 жыл бұрын
@Andrew Layton The kind of person that calls experts " clueless dweebs " is generally sufferng from the Dunning-kruger effect wherein those who have less knowledge of a subject tend to have the loudest and more arrogant opinions regarding the topic.
@250txc5 жыл бұрын
He called Lee personally a terrorist and said Lee set the war strategy for the south, same as modern day terrorists? Why would you smooch this guy? He smooched you with that southern accent line and sorry, I hear no southern accent; What an easy crowd most of you are to smooch that guy -- kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jKmBjNqprsncmX0.html
@3storiesUp5 жыл бұрын
You have got to admire the passion and enthusiasm with which this wonderful history is told by Steve. Thanks man. Loved it !!!!
@Inquisitor63215 жыл бұрын
Those little details - the inter-personal relationships and jealousies - although insignificant footnotes, they played a BIG role in the outcome of one of the most important battles of the war. I love the details!!! I often wonder about this in the ranks of the Wehrmacht in WWII how many battles went awry because of similar circumstances.
@sofly76345 жыл бұрын
@Inquisitor---you can believe big egos helped defeat them---their worship of aryan supremacy, know it all, etc
@StephenPaulTroup7 жыл бұрын
What a fantastic presentation! I have been a civil war buff my entire life and did not understand the real reason for Stuart's actions in this campaign. I want to hear this guy speak more!
@karlburkhalter15026 жыл бұрын
Stephen Troup but he is wrong about so much i wouldnt waste my time.
@StephenPaulTroup6 жыл бұрын
Could you waste a little time and tell us what he is wrong about and why?
@karlburkhalter15026 жыл бұрын
Who he left with Lee was irrelevant since he thought Mosby, Stringfellow or Conrad was available to contact the spies in Union HQ, This information had been vital in all previous campaigns. Lee needed Stuart in his role as espionage Chief, not cavalryman. If you miss that, you miss everything.
@StephenPaulTroup6 жыл бұрын
"Who he left with Lee is irrelevant"...That is a ridiculous statement. Assigning 2 corp of inexperienced cavalry on an invasion of enemy territory and leaving your experienced corps behind to guard supplies is simply bad strategy no matter who you are. "He thought..." That's sloppy planning on Stuart's part (assuming your point is correct)) to let his plan depend on "He thought..."
@karlburkhalter15026 жыл бұрын
Stephen Troup they were not inexperienced at all, they were very battle hardened veterans, just militia, border guards like Mosby and Niel, you are the inexperienced one, read a few books on CSA Cav. before playing in the big league.
@devilsadvocate581710 жыл бұрын
Great presentation, especially in defining the Clausewtizian utility of will and its utmost importance.
@wlh2276 жыл бұрын
Perhaps the best presentation that I have hear in my 75 years on the lead-up to the Battle of Gettysburg. Very informative.
@tk-ix5lw6 жыл бұрын
First of all, I am infatuated with the civil war; this guy is fantastic and as I read a moment ago from another comment, he knows how to tell a story. I already knew the economic factors and lack of materials and men that plagued the South. Steve Knott really explained in great detail what happened in Gettysburg; I would absolutely love to sit down and talk to this guy, and could listen to him every day and never tire.GREAT JOB STEVE!! I hope they pay you fantastic money there, it is well deserved.
@radamus2105 жыл бұрын
I wish I had teachers like this guy- He would have me on the edge of my seat all day
@Belongia776 жыл бұрын
Steve Knott was one of my favorite teachers in High School! Great teacher, coach, person and friend!
@thedryingco6 жыл бұрын
Steve would have the same passion for this subject on a street corner or anywhere that you spoke with him. This is the right person for The War College.
@superspectator1237 жыл бұрын
Great video. The battle finally makes sense to me. Thank you.
@retepish10 жыл бұрын
I would like to see the whole presentation.
@bobgilbert73625 жыл бұрын
The lecturer, Steve Knott, is a very accomplished speaker and historian.
@philidox5 жыл бұрын
As a U.S. military officer he was 100% correct about officer putting their rivarly above the greater good. Hell, I've done it myself without even noticing it but that's how people are and officers are no different.
@mountainmanws5 жыл бұрын
I just blundered into this presentation. Magnificent! An animated, enthusiastic, and well-written class. This presentation needs to be seen by every high school student studying (If they still are studying American History) the American Civil War. I do agree with Blaze Callahan. Would have been nice to see the map. Thank you for posting.
@Torquemada852389 жыл бұрын
The contradiction of "They weren't after shoes.", and Stuart slowed his column with a captured mule trail of wagons, is troubling. They were after supplies. They were attempting to capture whatever materials of war and provisions whenever and wherever possible. Secondly, the "second largest city of the Confederacy" was marching, and marching a couple hundred miles on dirt and thru water and mud ruins shoes. So, yes, one of the reasons they chose Gettysburg was because of a chance to seize supplies there and one of the chief supplies of the city at that time, was shoes. The cargo of the mule train isn't mentioned, but it was significant enough that a senior commander slowed his march to keep it, and deliver it to the Confederate Army. The interpersonal relationships angle of the lecture is well done and valid. That has been well documented in the Union army, how favoritism adversely affected the progress of the war for the North.
@cjduhaime882 ай бұрын
Excellent comment about shoes and other supplies.
@davidkeely4321 күн бұрын
There were no shoes at Gettysburg. That story was a complete fabrication of the journalists following the battle who did not understand Lee’s strategy or orders. The mule pulled wagons was absolutely a problem - Lee reprimanded Stuart over the issue.
@johnmassoud9307 жыл бұрын
Fascinating analysis. Thanks for posting
@TheKenPrescott4 жыл бұрын
Given some of the silliness that was going on in some of the units I was in during the final years of the Cold War, I am profoundly thankful that we didn't go to war with that leadership roster. A fascinating presentation.
@james64954 жыл бұрын
EXCELLENT presentation! I'd love to hear the full version!
@ddjay13636 жыл бұрын
It's good to see a historian animated and speaking with passion.
@blazecal10 жыл бұрын
Nice presentation but frustrating to not see the map!
@dave95646 жыл бұрын
or split
@joeahearn44136 жыл бұрын
Seeing the maps would help make the lecture clearer for folks who haven't studied this campaign.
@WelshRabbit6 жыл бұрын
Just so. The camera followed Capt. Knott (USN) so carefully keeping centered on him while ignoring what Knott was trying to show on the map. It's like the cameraman was told "follow the speaker no matter what," to which he dutifully obeyed -- with his actions completely devoid of judgment and personal initiative.
@A1Authority6 жыл бұрын
*HEADS UP CIVIL WAR HISTORIANS!* As of this notification, see what *WIKIPEDIA* has posted as a Confederate Flag!!! It's an SJW nightmare, and you have reason to hound them, big-time! For those of us who hold the lives and the reasons the war was fought as sacred or worthy of respect, this is proof that WIKIPEDIA is a biased, unreliable, history-bending pile of shit. *Rally, men and sisters of the cause!* A wrong needs righting!!!
@WelshRabbit6 жыл бұрын
Don W, of course it is generally known that Wikipedia is just a do-it-yourself encyclopaedia. It is representative only of the last wise and learned expert -- or obnoxious & ignorant buffoon, to touch it. Wikipedia articles are sometimes superb. Sometimes they are just a pile of worthless detritus.
@georgiamule6 жыл бұрын
Very informative and enjoyable. Makes me reevaluate my admiration for Gen Stuart.
@t44florida10 жыл бұрын
Is there a video that continues this lecture.... from the point that the speaker ends and the next speaker continues the lecture?????????????????????
@johngoerger89965 жыл бұрын
Custer & additional Union Cav units prevented Confederate Cav units to assist Pickett's Charge thus preventing the Confederates from winning at Gettysburg
@sofly76345 жыл бұрын
@John--go Wolverines! Unfortunately this may have been what stoked Custer's ego to try Little Big Horn.
@danporter11762 ай бұрын
@@sofly7634 well he was trying to run for president and get a big win heading in
@lebarosky7 жыл бұрын
Very good presentation. Cadre attrition was a terrible problem for Lee, and it bore fruit against him at Gettysburg.
@abhcoat5 жыл бұрын
Loved the presentation. I wish I could see the rest of this.
@johnnyllooddte34155 жыл бұрын
ive listenned to this 3 or 4 times.. this gentleman is brilliant.. not all his conclusions are correct..but he knows his business.. hes about 95% correct here on lee and 100% correct on human nature
@francisebbecke27276 жыл бұрын
I know why Jeb Stewart went to Caslisle. There is a great Italian restaurant in the downtown area.
@justeremiahsjourney5 жыл бұрын
I used to work there. Piazzo.
@QuantumRift5 жыл бұрын
Jeb didn't like Italian food.
@mobilechief5 жыл бұрын
I know I have been there
@user-xy8qk9gz7gАй бұрын
@@mobilechiefnear the recess rm
@johnr72795 жыл бұрын
Awesome video and starts off good right away. The way he is presenting information makes the history interesting and puts things into context. I remember when the History Channel used to be like that. This presentation would make a great program there!
@baconfatlabs9 жыл бұрын
Who was the largest Southern manufacturer? Tredegar? I have fond memories of visiting Tredegar Iron Works.
@kaycox55555 жыл бұрын
Outstanding presentation, thanks for posting!
@oarfrost6 жыл бұрын
That was great, particularly the bit about the second largest city in the Confederacy.
@davidjsouth2314 жыл бұрын
I lived relatively close to the war college in Carlisle for 20+ years, just never had the opportunity to go tour the displays and what not
@L8Pilot5 жыл бұрын
I love the comment: " When I say we, I mean the Confederates".
@Vlad65WFPReviews6 жыл бұрын
Tremendous lecture. The opening on Lee's war aims helps explain why he was so headstrong about giving battle at Gettyburg instead of threatening Washington as Longstreet recommended. Similarly why he committed to Pickett's attack - all due to his obsession with obliterating the Army of the Potomac. This presentation is a nice adjunct to Chernow's excellent new biography on Grant. Well done, Mr Knott.
@philipwolf36195 жыл бұрын
Remakably insightful !! So glad Steve Knott is on our side. So right about "who's who in the zoo."
@skipsassy18 жыл бұрын
See why Shelby Foote is so, so popular - the Elvis Presley sound of the PBS Civil War Series - and his 3 set Civil War books are the best.
@HambonesAdventures4 жыл бұрын
One of Sun Tzu’s first teachings is exactly what the professor started off with. 👍🏽 love this professor Ive learned so much. This is my favorite channel. i enjoy comparing the professors lectures to Sun Tzu’s teachings. One of My questions on today’s lecture is for the professor. Gen Longstreet “Lee’s old war horse” suggested to Lee several times that they regroup so to gain better ground also Stuart “the eyes of the confederate army” had finally arrived that being said why did Lee one of the greatest most beloved generals decide to attack the center? Do you think he really believed his army was invincible? Love your lectures keep posting thank you sir. Hampton Y
@Zoetropeification5 жыл бұрын
Very good presentation, I learned things I did not know about Stuart's relationship with his subordinates.
@williamculverhouse66397 жыл бұрын
Outstanding presentation! But- now that my curiosity is piqued- where is the presentation of "the esteemed Dr. Sommers"?
@tk-ix5lw6 жыл бұрын
Thank you, my thoughts exactly!!
@larrydugan13765 жыл бұрын
My question also
@marsta19805 жыл бұрын
@Phillip Hiller The South had only one chance to win the war and that was to exhaust the North, which, as this presentation notes, was possible, however, they had very little margin for error. The personality issues in the Western Confederate armies were even worse. The Confederate generals hated each other and, most of all, hated Braxton Bragg, the commander of the Army of the Tennessee. That Army's disarray did much to ensure defeat in the West for the Confederacy. That along with Grant's brilliant Vicksburg Campaign, of course.
@kevinwheatley63425 жыл бұрын
even braggs wife stuck it up him.a case of who you know not what you know.
@arvos215 жыл бұрын
Fascinating. Thanks for posting this.
@PolymerFlute10 жыл бұрын
This is the best presentation on the Civil War I have seen. Thanks for posting.
@gus66858 жыл бұрын
Great lecture!
@OHexpat125 жыл бұрын
The War College has moments of levity in discussing war. Very palatable!
@tubularfrog5 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation. I love the highlighting of the interpersonal conflicts in the Confederate leadership and the effects it had on the tactics. This is something seen later with the rivalry of Patton and Montgomery in WW2. I would really like to see a production of Steve Knott in a more detailed analysis of the battle as narrator in a more graphics intensive video.
@robertdavenport54574 жыл бұрын
Can you say Arnhem or a Bridge to Far. It was a direct result of Monty's need to outshine Patton. So unlike his other battles. Monty was excellent but not usually daring. Lots of courage in the battles but lives could have been spent elsewhere for greater advantage
@kaycox195 жыл бұрын
Terrific lecture, thanks for sharing.
@harivikraman98219 жыл бұрын
I do like the way he talks about the war, as he keeps it interesting and engaging; however, I would like to see the camera focus on the projector screen when he uses his laser pointer on points on the screen. I can't see what he's pointing at when he uses his pointer.
@BadWebDiver6 жыл бұрын
If you've seen any historic battle maps of this point in the Civil War campaign, it's pretty easy to know what he's talking abut.o
@christophertaylor11539 жыл бұрын
I stand corrected. It was Buford and his Union cavalry that was first arriving at Gettysburg. Yes, they had repeating rifles. And Longstreet's infantry had a hard march on the way to the battlefield and his forces were probably exhausted from the march. So it was Buford's forces that were holding back the Confederate forces at Gettysburg on the first day of the battle.
@JRobbySh6 жыл бұрын
That Buford was able to go toe-to-toe with an infantry brigade long enough for Reynold’s to come up was something that would have been unthinkable a year earlier. The Union cavalry had good weapons but obviously they were now the equal to Confederate cavalry.
@tomdefranco8166 жыл бұрын
Buford’s troopers did not have repeaters. They had a variety of single shot breech loaders which gave them an advantage, but not as big an advantage as the repeaters would have. Only a couple companies of Custer’s Wolverines carried repeaters at the time - perhaps some units of Berdan’s sharpshooters.
@indy_go_blue60486 жыл бұрын
Both responses are correct. Actually Buford fought a marvelous delaying action as Judy says, lasted long enough to allow Reynold's to bring up his two leading brigades, those of Cutler and Meredith (the fabulous Iron Brigade) which were reinforced during the rest of the morning and early afternoon by the remainder of the 1st Corp and the 11th Corp. Hooker's reorganization of the Union cavalry turned it into the elite organization that stood toe-to-toe against Heth's division and Stuart and later to dominate the worn-out Confederate cavalry.
@jason60chev6 жыл бұрын
The breech loading Sharps carbines gave the Federal troopers superior fire power and their mobility allowed them to defend the NWest and Northern approaches to the town. If Reynolds had taken longer to arrive, Buford would have exhausted his ammo and have to pull back.
@AudieHolland5 жыл бұрын
Having watched a documentary about the war between Prussia and Austria in 1866, I can tell you that the major advantage of a breechloading rifle is that you can remain in cover or very close to the ground. A musketman can only reload with efficiency if he remains standing up, easily targeted and hit by the opposing infantry.
@lomax3439 жыл бұрын
This would be better if the camera focussed on the display rather than the speaker.
@michaelpedersen59136 жыл бұрын
The beginning of this lecture is so good, this guy can end all misconceptions about the war
@wombat73665 жыл бұрын
I’m always amazed by knowledgeable military historians who pronounce “cavalry” as “calvary”.
@sofly76345 жыл бұрын
Went to school on this one. Very informative. Would never read in the history books that Jeb had interpersonal relationship deficits that cost the south the war!
@Dalbert3427 жыл бұрын
Awesome presentation :)
@MegaRebel1005 жыл бұрын
zeer zeer goed gebracht en uitgelegd dank voor de upload groet uit Holland u weet wel daar waar Longstreet van daan kwam
@zuto9610 жыл бұрын
This was good learned a lot!
@rtk35435 жыл бұрын
Great speaker and made a good presentation of Lee's motives for the Gettysburg campaign, but likes others have said, shame we were not shown the map.
@stevefowler21125 жыл бұрын
Outstanding presentation...this battle like most lost battles come down to poor Command, poor Control and poor Communication.
@ralphdye4516 жыл бұрын
Excellent lecture. I wish I could have seen this before watching the mini-series "Gettysburg", it would have explained a lot. For instance, why Lee was so insistent on fighting the Union army "here and now".
@BadWebDiver6 жыл бұрын
And I loved the way that movie showed the interaction between Longstreet, Lee and Harrison at the beginning. And the use of re-enactors for the period extras.
@250txc5 жыл бұрын
Might be a little propaganda in there somewhere, so be careful and never heard anyone say Lee was no different than a modern day terrorist
@sofly76345 жыл бұрын
@Ralph--without these notes you still would not be fully informed about motives though.
@cameronwalker27225 жыл бұрын
Damn i needed this class in college
@malafunkshun80865 жыл бұрын
Interesting presentation...and a very lively speaker! 😊🤙🏼
@danyaradimacher658110 жыл бұрын
I thoroughly enjoyed this tutorial, the lecturer was very enthuasiatic, excellent eye contact with his audiece and possess excellent volume of speech and he thorough knows his stuff, but just a small note is that the camera should have been directed at the overhead project or the presentation. Part from that, its an extremely interesting lecture :)
@newcars115 жыл бұрын
Great presentation. Nice to understand what happen to Jeb Stuart.
@Komnenos12345 жыл бұрын
This is such a great lecture.
@frankdawe51565 жыл бұрын
This guy knows his material. It really puts things into perspective to know all these little sub-stories.
@johnmcnett92415 жыл бұрын
This is a great presentation. Thanks.
@andrewsilverstein61866 жыл бұрын
Great analysis, excellent presentation
@philipbuckley7598 жыл бұрын
excellent presentation....a true professional...
@250txc5 жыл бұрын
Really? He called Lee a terrorist? And acted like Lee set the entire military plan?
@citizen20twenty448 жыл бұрын
Why does the cameraman fixate on the speaker as he's constantly referring to a map, but not show the map?
@adamschrepfer10865 жыл бұрын
yeah whoever graciously recorded this (thank you!) needs a video editor to put in maps and stuff
@GAME4WAR5 жыл бұрын
The cameraman was engaged to the speakers wife before the engagement was called off so he is purposely trying to sabotage the video of his lecture.
@simpleman56884 жыл бұрын
Citizen20 Twenty Well, obviously the cameraMan is gay for this guy! Thanks for asking.
@zipstermorris80556 жыл бұрын
What a good presentation.
@story19516 жыл бұрын
I knew J.E.B. messed up, but didn't know the details. Great lecture. In truth, Lee should have known to take cavalry he trusted. Why take cavalry you were not going to use?
@Kevin-qn2kw5 жыл бұрын
Is there a part 2?? Great presentation!
@prestonrenify6 жыл бұрын
Excellent talk...please have camera pan to maps the next time. Perhaps a college student might edit video to add maps and markers to your audio. Will look for more of your CW talks. Thanks
@williamhopper11349 жыл бұрын
Interesting, but the camera work could have been better and actually show the projection.
@bhoffman645079 жыл бұрын
William Hopper You are right, William. There is relatively inexpensive software that allows you to split the screen so you can see the speaker in one box and the slides in another and package it into KZfaq format. That is one of my pet peeves with taped lectures. I don't really care to see the speaker. I want to see the visuals to which they are referring.
@perfidiousalbion59857 жыл бұрын
This fellow is is an awesome lecturer! He really draws you into the story... and it can be about anything.. Steve Knott weaves the story and basically brings in the real reason why JEB Stuart failed Lee. In the end we know that intelligence is absolutely crucial for the success of an army, and without the Cavalry (back then) as its eyes and ears Lee was blind. Lessons learned, Cavalry must be act as the whiskers of the main force and be in constant communication to the main force.. Stuart failed in this in colossal way by being completely out of touch with Lee for several crucial days. Had the Calvary been deployed more effectively, Gettysburg may not have happened or if it had happened it would have been on Lee's terms. The irony was that it was during this engagement that the Union Cavalry was most effective in their role. Buford's Cavalry provided the Army of the Potomac with advanced intelligence so vitally needed and was able to screen Lee's advanced elements until the main body was able to consolidate the high ground.
@karlburkhalter15026 жыл бұрын
Perfidious Albion darn if dont get it, most of these fools cant spell horse.
@karlburkhalter15026 жыл бұрын
in other word yes you are correct.
@jameshorn2706 жыл бұрын
In fact, what was missing was Stuart, not cavalry. Lee still had three brigades of cavalry with him, but not an overall leader to use them efficiently. One brigade was sent to the northwest, into the mountains where they did some damage to the railroads, and may have scarfed up enough supplies from scattered farms to support themselves, but contributed nothing to intelligence and did not participate in the battle. What a brigade did could have been done by detaching a regiment. The rest of the cavalry seems to have been used to clear the way to Harrisburg before being recalled. Some of that force could have been better used scouting east of the Mountains. When Early headed toward the Susquehanna, some of that cavalry should have established a screen south of the Maryland border to watch his flank. That would also more likely have allowed an earlier hookup with Stuart. Lee had cavalry. He did not use it properly.
@makayllercher87935 жыл бұрын
The real reason Stuart failed Lee is because of his ego. The Flora Cook saga, combined with the Battle Of Brandy Station. Where the Union Calvary fought the Confederate Calvary in a pitched day long battle. The Union withdrew but not in headlong flight as it had in the past. Stuart was angered that they dared to challenge his men. As a result, he felt he had to regain his "honor" and humiliate the North again. Thus the ride around the Army of the Potomac.
@clockmonkey5 жыл бұрын
Greatly enjoyed that.
@suburbanwisdom4 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation! The lead up to Gettysburg is as amazing as the battle itself, and great explanation of Stuart's actions beyond he was just showboating and goofing around, but how his ego really screwed things up. Also good to see Bernie Sanders front and center in case he actually becomes POTUS and has to deal with such a situation.
@markoldendorf53935 жыл бұрын
Finest presentation on The back story of Gettysburg.
@tassovarvarikos3845 жыл бұрын
Excellent Presentation!
@randym75116 жыл бұрын
This is a most excellent teaching. As a complete aside: did anyone else notice his consistent substitution of "calvary" for "cavalry"? I find it interesting. Perhaps it's a Freudian slip.
@piescespiesces6027 жыл бұрын
Terrific lecture !
@glennanderson71204 жыл бұрын
This was a very interesting presentation. How can I get more?
@jrcastrorwc7 жыл бұрын
I like this guy's energy
@waiting4aliens6 жыл бұрын
very informative and well presented.
@philipbuckley7598 жыл бұрын
how does one find the follow up to this video...
@tomservo53476 жыл бұрын
Credit to Joseph Hooker for the reforms he made while in command. The most important one was he took cavalry that was attached to various regiments, and consolidated them into their own force. Yankee cavalry was starting to feel it's strength by the time of Gettysburg. Hooker was also responsible for the positioning of the various pieces of the Army of the Potomac that he screened Lee with and they were positioned superbly. They were able to keep an eye on Lee and concentrate fairly quickly when contact was made. All the pieces were in place when Meade took over.
@alexsuarez4855 жыл бұрын
Brilliant teacher.
@hellcat81377 жыл бұрын
At the beginning the speaker says he normally does a longer lecture- would love to hear the full version.
@karlburkhalter15026 жыл бұрын
The men needed horse shoes, not people shoes, he is dead wrong about too much to be taken seriously.
@moncorp15 жыл бұрын
@@karlburkhalter1502 ~ and you are??? Let me guess, a guy who's read some books.
@karlburkhalter15025 жыл бұрын
moncorp1 Inc and got a degree in history, a few books? many hundreds, actually.
@kenmurray84765 жыл бұрын
And that's why you are an instructor at the Army War College, no doubt.