Tank trailers carry more weight, but Scania P and Volvo FM are light-duty trucks. They are not suitable for such loads. Also look at the front tire width at 9:55. It is very small. Trucking companies should have a good understanding of cargo handling with suitable trucks. 🤔🤔🤔
Bad configuration, 6x2 doesn't work there, those trucks have to be 6x4, they should also use reducing hubs, they would avoid many problems, not to mention using trucks with 500hp or more and not trucks with less than 400hp as those engines are designed for half of weight.
Ten wheels head but one axel is follow axel so really axel must be reduced pushing force
@user-uc1sp7yr9g2 ай бұрын
รถเสียแมนบอกจ้า
@user-fs6dr4ls9xАй бұрын
มันขึ้นไม่ไหวเข้านะผุ้หญิง😅
@user-fd8mq1un9i25 күн бұрын
中國軍用6×6越野拖頭最適合用,拖坦克用!😮
@ballaki2 ай бұрын
What is the probelm of both volvoes? someone tell me
@outofreach37202 ай бұрын
The problem is that the trailers are too heavy compared to the performance of the trucks. Volvo FM, and Volvo FH 440 are light duty trucks. Not all trucks in this video are suitable for this weight, not just the Volvo. At least a 540HP engine is needed to load that much.
@ballaki2 ай бұрын
@@outofreach3720 i think the problem is drive system of trucks i think both are 6x2 not 6x4. but not sure
@ballaki2 ай бұрын
@@outofreach3720Look at first one scania 360 is climbing easily. but it is 6x4.
Wat een prutsers een 6x4 en ze kunnen er niet mee overweg 😂
@forestofgames9043Ай бұрын
Isuzu more better then volvo😂😂😂😂
@Dirilis16212 күн бұрын
volvo 👎 scania 💪
@sandrocanali635915 күн бұрын
Per fare questo lavoro in salita in italia enni 60 / 70 ,si usavano solo autotreni , 4assi la motrice piu il rimorchio a 4 assi anche con soli 209 cavalli andavano su in qualsiasi salita,con un solo asse motore , no mai autoarticolato le ruote davanti per il grande peso gravante solo sulla Ralla non toccano terra galleggiano .