Userwish - Dome - Kuppel - SolidWorks 2017 Training

No video

Userwish - Dome - Kuppel - SolidWorks 2017 Training - Part Design

Рет қаралды 23,087

6 жыл бұрын

Very similar to the other versions - enjoy!
If you want to see more, please give it a like or leave a comment down below. If you liked it please subscribe to my YT-Channel and to my Facebook Cad Page as well.
For better a overview regarding my youtube videos - head over to my blog.
My blog: www.walden-wolf...
My facebook page: / wolfgang.walden
My facebook cad page: www.facebook.c...
My LinkedIn profile: / 694
My Xing profile: www.xing.com/p...
My Video2Brain profile: www.video2brai...
My Google+ profile: plus.google.co...
Complete ordered list of my YT Autocad Trainings www.walden-wolf...
Complete ordered list of my YT Autodesk Fusion 360 Trainings www.walden-wolf...
Complete ordered list of my YT Catia v5/v6 Trainings: www.walden-wolf...
Complete ordered list of my YT Inventor Trainings: www.walden-wolf...
Complete ordered list of my YT Onshape Trainings: www.walden-wolf...
Complete ordered list of my YT Siemens NX Trainings: www.walden-wolf...
Complete ordered list of my YT SolidEdge ST Trainings: www.walden-wolf...
Complete ordered list of my YT SolidWorks Trainings: www.walden-wolf...
My old geman company website: www.wwmc.de

Пікірлер: 56

@davidallen7858 Жыл бұрын

Best solidworks dome tutorial I have viewed - no magic numbers. But it is not geodesic. You can do great things with your layered domes that are impossible with geodesic domes but the geodesic ones have much greater repetition and simplicity. Much better are Sketchup tutorials that start from natural rectangles - fundamentally simple from start to finish. It shows the difference in use of a package that was designed in 3D from the start compared to one that converts 2D thought to 3D.

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training Жыл бұрын

I know, it was a userwish, He sent me a drawing with specific dimensions, so no calculation wanted and needed.

@joshpit2003 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks for making this. I followed along and made some custom domes in CAD. It's fun playing with the different variables to create some really funky shapes. I'll probably stick with the domes based on normal polyhedrons though, but it's good to know this method of control exists.

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training 6 жыл бұрын

You´re welcome.

@designwarp9117 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much Wolfgang !!! This was super easy to follow, my dome came out first try :)

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training 2 жыл бұрын

Great 🙂 yoou´re welcome

@crazycasseer 3 жыл бұрын

Great Video. Can you please tell me how to calculate the sizes of polygons and distance between planes for domes of different sizes.

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training 3 жыл бұрын

Sorry, I didn´t calculate those dimensions. I was sent a drawing with dimensions by mail. If you want to calculate those dimensions search for "geodesic dome"

@M4573rm05h 5 жыл бұрын

Hello Walden!! This is a great vid, thank you for posting it : )) Just one question: Once that the dome is created, can it tell you the total perimeter of the sum of those solids? I want to build a wire structure and I would like to know how much wire I will need and at which point or coordinates I have to solder so it turns out perfectly. Thanks again in advance!!

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training 5 жыл бұрын

I think you have to do that calculation on your own.

@ExtemporeMuzzzz 6 жыл бұрын

Thanks this was great video. Really came in need. I got question if you can help. I wanna use this to build greenhouse and I gonna need to get right shamfer angles for triangles. Any easy way to calculate right shamfer?

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training 6 жыл бұрын

Sorry, what would be the "right" chamfer angle??? You need a certain angle?

@ExtemporeMuzzzz 6 жыл бұрын

Nothing wrong with sketch. Your sketch was amazing. I am talking about when adding thicken in triangle outer diameter is larger then inner diameter. I was wondering how much I need to chamfer from both sides of different triangle to make it perfect fit. Wood starts for square so need to adjust it. So looking way to know how to calculate chamfered angle for each triangle.

@ExtemporeMuzzzz 6 жыл бұрын

I think I maybe got it .Have to test it later thou. 180-160,51= 19.49/2 = 9.745 angle I think...

@bpetnoi1472 Жыл бұрын

Wolfgang am I correct in that his is a 2v design. If so then there are only two distinct triangle sizes correct? If that is true could one not safe a lot of time by just drawing the two different triangles and then assembling them into a dome. The vertex of each triangle could just be mated to the points of the sketch. I might be wrong in that the time to mate all triangles might take as long or longer than drawing the dome as one part. Please advise.

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training Жыл бұрын

Sorry, what is a 2v design? I was sent a drawing with these exact dimensions so I did it this way. If those triangles would have all the same dimensions you could do it much faster with just 2 patterns.

@bpetnoi1472 Жыл бұрын

@@wolfgang.walden.cad.training Wolfgang, A dome of 2v design just means there are only two triangles sizes used in the construction of the dome or sphere. I was just wondering if you knew if your drawing was a 2v design. I liked your work and found your approach very interesting.

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training Жыл бұрын

I see, sorry I don´t recall. But assume there were more than 2 different triangles, otherwise I would have done it in a different way

@kavinganseemaan5860 Жыл бұрын

This is very usefull video. And many thanks for you Hi friend i like this video. But I have small one Doubt, can you solve it. Very urgent

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training Жыл бұрын

How could I solve it?

@samshendo9209 5 жыл бұрын

I've got to the point you are at at 17.35 (ready to circular pattern the combine's) but when I tried to pattern the sections the error message "unable to pattern the selected feature combine1" , any ideas why?

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training 5 жыл бұрын

Sorry, can´t tell without seeing your model. Did you try to pattern the bodies? If you try the features it will not work.

@richardschmid235 4 жыл бұрын

I am not able to combine? Do you have an idea? Thanks

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training 4 жыл бұрын

Without seeing your model? Maybe there are some gaps between your solids, than you could not combine or it is a parasolid problem, meaning your soilds touch only with an edge.

@intiferino 2 жыл бұрын

Very great video!

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks :)

@DjeSiBila 6 жыл бұрын

Hallo Herr Walden. Super Videos. Danke! Bin dabei mein uraltes Inventor-Wissen aufzufrischen und zu vertiefen. Nun habe ich von Solidworks erfahren. Welches Programm finden Sie denn besser: Solidworks oder Autodesk Inventor? Viele Grüße.

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training 6 жыл бұрын

Danke fürs Lob! Inventor ist benutzerfreundlicher und intuitiver zu bedienen. Solidworks ist bei der Flächenkonstruktion besser. Beide sind für Maschinenbauer mehr als ausreichend. Für Flächenkonstruktion : Catia oder NX.

@DjeSiBila 6 жыл бұрын

Danke für die Rückmeldung. Welche der Programme werden denn auf dem Arbeitsmarkt am meisten genutzt?

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training 6 жыл бұрын

Hängt von der Branche ab - Fahrzeuge, Flugzeug, Schiff : Catia und NX der Rest dann Inventor, Solidworks.

@DjeSiBila 6 жыл бұрын

Sie kennen Sich ja wirklich gut aus. Inventor wird aber nach wie vor in vielen Branchen gerne genutzt? Frage deshalb so direkt, da ich mich ungerne in eine Software einarbeiten möchte, die vielleicht spürbar an Relevanz verloren hat.

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training 6 жыл бұрын

Schwer zu sagen, fragen Sie bei den Firmen die Sie im Auge haben einfach mal nach. Ich denke dass sehr viele Firmen Inventor verwenden.

@dionismarku8272 3 жыл бұрын

Hallo Hr. Walden. Wie entscheidet der Programm die seitliche Wanddicke, wo Sie ein Shell auf beide Seiten machen?

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training 3 жыл бұрын

Wie bei jedem "Shell"-Tool. Die Flächen welche nicht entfernt werden erhalten alle die ausgewählte Dicke. Aber vielleicht meinen Sie auch etwas anderes.

@dionmar1 3 жыл бұрын

Hallo Hr. Walden. Ja klar, das weiss ich. Ich meinte die übrigen seitigen Wanddicken, nachdem Sie das Shell gemacht haben. Die haben eine bestimmte Dicke. Wie wird diese Dicke vom Programm entschieden?

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training 3 жыл бұрын

Sorry, welche "übrigen seitlichen Wandstärken" meinen sie denn?

@dionismarku8272 3 жыл бұрын

Hallo Hr. Walden. Ich meine, die "leere" Dreiecken, die übrig geblieben sind, nachdem Sie den Shell 25 mm pro Seite gemacht haben. Nicht die 50 mm vom Befehl "thicken" am Anfang, sonder die übrige Wandstärke senkrecht, z. B. min 14.32. Das wollte ich wissen, wie der Programm entscheidet, was soll diese Wandstärke sein.

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training 3 жыл бұрын

Ganz einfach, dass sind einzelne Solids/Volumenkörper. Wie schon gesagt dann bleiben alle Wände mit der gleichen Dicke stehen. Jedes "Dreieck" ist ein Körper, die sind nicht zusammengebaut/vereinigt. ;)

@teresastbarros Жыл бұрын

Great tutorial!

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training Жыл бұрын

thanks 🙂you´re welcome

@tobyqaws 5 жыл бұрын

Hi, I am an university student and I do need a help. I am struggling on the dome design for my final year project. I worked for 3 weeks already and I got nothing done. I am not going to be a civil engineer in the future therefore I think there is no point for me to know how to work on the dome design with solidwork. However, I need to finish this project for my graduation and I want to finish it. Can you help me for the drawing part please? I can pay you for that because I do need some help right now.

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training 5 жыл бұрын

So what kind of problem do you have?

@tobyqaws 5 жыл бұрын

@@wolfgang.walden.cad.training I need to draw a dome but have a different shape compare to the dome that you designed in this clips. The dome that I design is circular dome with 5 layers and 20 bricks in each layer. The objective of the final year project is to use a 3D printer to print out the bricks and combine it into a dome. The problem I have is that I couldn't draw a curve surface of the dome and draw it into 100 bricks in total rather than a huge dome with lines on it.

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training 5 жыл бұрын

@@tobyqaws I seems you should use an assembly not a part. Do you have a picture of your "dome" ?

@tobyqaws 5 жыл бұрын

@@wolfgang.walden.cad.training yes I do have a handcrafted drawing of it. Do you mind if we talk about this with email?

@wolfgang.walden.cad.training 5 жыл бұрын

@@tobyqaws mail: info@wwmc.de