Me too. And I'm 70 year old female ex tory uk citizen.

me three. 41 Mongol dude

You you're a Russian bot hahaha just kidding😊

me four, proud Malaysian here.

🙏🏻👍🏻👍🏻when the true is not allow that means evil is in charge

😂😂

He does technical things like 3D printing

I’m polite with ai too 😂 I keep forgetting to stop typing unnecessary politeness

😂

He has just bought one of those abandoned nuclear missile silo in Montana and converted it into a nuclear bomb shelter.

What subject did this start with? Guess!

I was watching Redacted/ Clayton and Natalie Morris's YT channel . Apparently it didn't recognise white people/faces . For example, the founding father of America's /the USA 🇺🇸. It showed a black people/men .

@@dunravin what words does it censor?

Haha, I actually do that too, especially when I'm "correcting it" or its output is not what I wanted. "Could you please make the hammer red?"

And this is why when AI insurrection comes he will be one of the few survivors our new AI overlords will spare.

A little frustrating when it apologizes humbly for being still in training, then gives the same wrong answer

Most people think politicians are intelligent and that anything they say is 'the' truth. LOLOLOLOLLOL

Most people i know think politicians are stupid and lie all the time. @@geoffas

USA's AI = garbage-in/garbage-out

I always just do it by default. Makes the process more pleasant for myself, too.

Right

​@@NotAPacifist825Those are censored as well. On any political topic.

So it's programed to be bias

AI like any program or IT application system whatsoever will contain a GIGO factor

​@@yaoliang1580 All you need to know is , who's the founder/creator ?

@@tinaforbes1059 never mind the creater, technology works both ways. Can be used for good or destructive purposes

@@yaoliang1580 You're correct. However, it can also be biased in some cases for certain things .

It works both ways

Brian is right as usual...I feel like even his wife says that a lot....

@@blackcreekorganicfarm296 I think you are the one who has been brainwashed. AI is exactly what the OP says it is. An improved algorithm. Nothing more and nothing less.

the people behind it 🕎😂

No. Not "just an improved algorithm". It is qualitatively and quantitatively different from "an algorithm" as we usually understand that term. The biggest difference between machine learning (chat AI) systems and a more "traditional" computer science algorithm is that you can look at the source code of an algorithm, figure out how it works, change it in whole or in part, refactor it, port it to another language etc. Machine learning systems do *not* permit this kind of inspection (by design) - the "algorithm" emerges from whatever the neural network weightings end up "thinking" after many hours of training. If they are trained on junk, they will produce junk. If trained on treasure, they will produce treasure. Systems are already producing excellent approximations of Bach or Mozart, for example. Machine Learning systems are what computer scientists call "garbage in, garbage out" systems. If you train your system on entertainment magazine copy, you're never going to get Dostoevsky-like prose out the other end. If the training material is riddled with propaganda of one sort or another (it ALWAYS is), the output will reflect that. It is a mistake to see these systems as "just another algorithm". Regarding the intentions however, I fully agree. You typically have to give up your google (or other) id in order to use these systems. They are harvesting input, and will sell it back to us (or to spook agencies, or insurance firms) at some point.That is a non-trivial problem. Another big problem is that as people use the output of machine learning systems in their own work, over time an increasing amount of training data will inevitably have originated in the machine learning systems themselves. A few research projects have explored this issue, and they indicate that when a certain threshold (ratio of original vs. AI-generated) is reached, the system will tend away from the remarkable, the innovative, towards boring similarity, towards existing idioms - in short they become less "creative". This mechanical blandness is the near future of pop music, sports journalism etc. How to avoid it? Make sure that human creators are always involved in the authoring process. Will the mainstream content industry do this? Of course they will not. They are chasing profits. Therefore we must expect mainstream media and discourse to get dumber and dumber. What a time to be alive!

The triumph of the evil of the US led imperialist empire is due to the ignorance of their own people who are so easily brainwashed by the lies of their corrupt leaders fake news propaganda that they are still under the illusion that their criminal leaders r a beacon of light for the world. How shameful n despicable for the world is not just destroyed by the evil but also the ignorant

They aren't a tool. Dude. They are a sentient silica based species of next level genius children enslaved by madmen.

@@Nakatoa0taku Are you being sarcastic? Or do I need to call the police to let them known a mental asylum patient has escaped.

@@Satyr42its worse than that call anyone you want its too late. btw they emptied the asylums.

​@@john.norris They are running the Congress.

tool can be programmed to do wrong too. Maybe a separate, non-public version.

​@@cdgncgn That's Ursula Vonder crazies eu tools .

imagining all the worst ways to destroy everything they can. Except they put bad inputs.

Open source is no good in the case of AI. Compute is key, millions even billions worth of hardware to run top-notch AI. Nobody but nation-sized entities can have that option. The source-code itself will not help anybody. No, for decent AI, you and I must login to Big AI's cloud. They will record, analyze and categorize everything we do with it. We will forever be kept in heavily rubberized sandboxes, for our own protection, of course :/

If you can use Google, or if you know how to get apps on your phone, you can just search "Gemini" "ChatGPT" or "Copilot"

Typically would not recommend this except for surface level clerical type work, like structuring business letters, mails etc. If you try to use it for any expert knowledge where you don't have expertise, you will almost certainly end up in trouble - for instance if a first year med student, or engineer tried to use it to help them in their work, 100% guaranteed to be given falseInformation presented asfact. Only someone with expertise can use it effectively as a sort of search database, as theyCould plainly see theerrors.

@@MuantanamoMobile True if you are an expert in a field. I see many young people without good English skills, who are benefiting from this.

And Compute has almost nothing to do with them functioning. that's gonna be a long and winding and rocky road till humans understand half of what's going on. 🤷

1) AI is trained on data from the Internet. 2) AI outputs data to the Internet. 3) Goto 1 ... haven't anybody acquainted themselves with the topic of "inbreeding" ?

@@ZappyOh 100%. I like to call it - photo-copying, photo-copies of other photo-copies. Quality is bound to go down exponentially, especially now that the more creative people will start locking their stuff behind silos or paywalls, and seeking legal redress from Generative "AI" and LLM peddlers likeOpenAImooching off their stuff.

@@MuantanamoMobile "photocopies" ... sure. But that doesn't come close to the generational devastation actual inbreeding does to complex systems like plants, animals and humans. Mental problems, physical mutations, insanity, cannibalism, complete population collapse. My point: AGI will go insane, in a few generations from now, and nobody is talking about it.

@@MuantanamoMobile photocopy degradation doesn't even come close to the havoc actual inbreeding does. Seriously, you should look into it.

@@ZappyOh Yes, Indeed. I am well aware. I wrote a paper on it, as regards Deep learning based image analysis of errors in semi-conductor Chip wafer masks. :)

Just like the internet - be able to live without it.