How Aircraft Carriers Defend Themselves From Missiles & More

Рет қаралды 447,918

Күн бұрын

Aircraft carriers are the centerpiece of America's Naval forces - the most adaptable and survivable airfields in the world. On any given day, Sailors aboard an aircraft carrier and its air wing come to the fight trained and equipped across a full range of missions. They are ready to control the sea, conduct strikes, and maneuver across the electromagnetic spectrum and cyberspace. No other naval force fields a commensurate range and depth of combat capabilities.
Check out these top picks for you:
• F-16 Fighter Jet: The ...
• GBU-53/B Stormbreaker:...
• UH-60 Black Hawk: The ...
🔔 Subscribe !
/ @usmilitary_news
Thanks
0:00 Introduction
1:36 MISSILE DEFENSE
3:20 LASER WEAPON
4:22 THE DRONES
5:38 GENS 5-6 AIRWING
6:41 COST MANAGEMENT
🔖 OUR SOCIAL MEDIA!
---------------------------------------------
📲 Facebook ► / usnmil
🐦 Twitter ► / usmil_news

Пікірлер: 257

@Absolut531kmh 2 жыл бұрын

1. The ships escorting it 2. AA systems 3. Chaffs/flares 4. Its aircraft

@agwhitaker 2 жыл бұрын

In 2005 during war games the Swedish diesel-electric submarine carried out several simulated attacks on CVN-76 USS Ronald Regan, and took up close and personal periscope images with clear shots of the flight deck crew. Then it quietly moved off. The pics are in the subs mess room walls today.

@Paul-yw4yr 2 жыл бұрын

And that is exactly what war games are for.

@thebookwasbetter3650 Жыл бұрын

That's because the war games were held close to shore in an area where the carrier would never operate during combat. Also a diesel powered sub could never have the range to catch an ocean bound vessel. They are for shore operations.

@VIDEOVISTAVIEW2020 Жыл бұрын

simulations does not reflect actual outcomes in a real battle

@SMGJohn Жыл бұрын

@@Paul-yw4yr But the US disregarded it as cheating and kept limiting the Swedes until america won. Its all pride and reliance on technology, gee I wonder where we seen that miserably fail hard in recent times....

@colinbclark 5 ай бұрын

I bet the crewman on that Swedish sub were silently pissing with themselves with laughter as they took those images.

@i-on-u Жыл бұрын

it’s a good thing we are not the experts., Super Carriers are NOT yet obsolete, in my opinion. They can still delivery many more planes to the enemy’s than a light carrier, having air superiority is the key in todays combat. Enemy’s still needs to find and track the carriers in the vast Oceans which is not easy to do.

@ghostmofo5829 4 ай бұрын

These things have way more capability than they will ever put on a video. Estimated 2 of these have as much total destructive abilities as the entirety of WW2. Nuclear weapons? Do you really want to guess?

@oneloveeduardo 2 жыл бұрын

You need multiple systems to deal with multiple attacks. Or possibly more of them meaning more of what we already have on each ship double, triple protection from onslaughts. The laser is the forcefield Shield if you only knew how to put it together. It's easy use the umbrella on a pole effect. Rudimentary but, it's a start. Just point the beam down from the pole all the way around the pole. Down towards the ground at an angle.

@chrishisel8815 2 жыл бұрын

Lasers are the future, once laser tech matures ballistic missile defense becomes much much better

@IWETROBOTICS 2 жыл бұрын

I will 1 day be a fighter pilot

@pieter_v.h.3539 2 жыл бұрын

Good luck 🤣💪🇺🇲💪

@m60pattoncovidiot29 2 жыл бұрын

Me to

@5.0joe50 2 жыл бұрын

I honestly believe that the next generation will be unmanned aircraft, meaning you'll likely be controlling your fighter from the ship. And if that's the future, that's fine too.

@michaeltowery2693 2 жыл бұрын

You will be a barrel boy

@f1reguy587 2 жыл бұрын

It would be a good job while things were going well… I’d hate my job to escalate from nothing to fear of either complete or partial detonation from numerous enemies, I’d be happier on the boat as a mechanic or munitions expert… plus better job security, make a couple of mistakes and your flight qualifiers change what you get to touch…

@frankmueller6522 2 жыл бұрын

Go forward, America! Long live the Nato! Long live freedom! Down with all dictatorships and terrorists all around the world! Best wishes from Germany!

@SNOWDONTRYFAN 2 жыл бұрын

For me it will always be having the ability to park up way over the horizon and operate well beyond the range of your own ships sensors under a kill web of forward flying aircraft example the F35 and E-2D Hawkeye (sensors) and the CSG air and ship defence system ( shooters) all integrated networked via their respective Multifunction Advanced Data Link (MADL) and the Naval Integrated Fire Control-Counter Air concept (NIFC-CA) all designed to tie together target data (links) from the ships and aircraft in a carrier strike group , one serious over the horizon threat which was clearly demonstrated by the new QE V/STOL joint carrier strike group which most certainly rattled the Chinese, note history about to be made by Capt. Amy Bauernschmidt, a helicopter pilot, will be in command of one of the USN 11 nuclear aircraft carriers in 2022. coming off the back of being the first women XO of the USS Abraham Lincoln.

@ariobarzan8714 2 жыл бұрын

US . Militray . Power 🇺🇸 👍👍👍👍👍👍

@paulmartin6895 2 жыл бұрын

Do not underestimate the bird farm . They do have their place . I was on a LHA class that is a helo assault carrier. These are a floating city .

@wli2718 2 жыл бұрын

submarines r probably by far the most dangerous foe to a carrier. unlike missiles, subs are virtually undetectable. the mere suspicion of a sub's existence require immediate response. the best defence is actually keep the carrier far away from enemy range.

@ghostmofo5829 4 ай бұрын

Each carrier group will have at least 1 sub with them. Always.

@goldmembere-commerce8765 2 жыл бұрын

Big blessings

@JamesLaserpimpWalsh 2 жыл бұрын

Nicely rendered graphics over film. Good objective info. Subbed.

@justaguy4real 2 жыл бұрын

1:50 absolutely astonishing the projectile explosiveness sequence occurs and without fail. Just wow

@noahway13 2 жыл бұрын

I was multi-tasking, saw that out the corner of my eye and thought it was spraying a fog or smokescreen or something. I was like, Huh? Had to rewind. Then, "Ooohhhhh"

@Samson373 2 жыл бұрын

A new carrier plus planes, bombs and a year or two of operating costs adds up to roughly $15 billion. Assuming nukes aren't used, can a carrier even do $15 billion worth of damage? Can it carry enough conventional bombs to do even $1 billion worth of damage? The lethality per dollar -- bang for the buck -- seems terrible. I understand carriers were crucial in the pacific in WWII but carriers cost so much less in the 1940s that they made more sense then. No longer. Is anyone in the Navy asking these big questions in a serious way?!

@bthorn5035 2 жыл бұрын

Carriers project power globally. There is a HUGE dollar value attached to that.

@shirazlone5881 2 жыл бұрын

USA air force and USA long live

@f1reguy587 2 жыл бұрын

Imagine a tethered airborne balloon carrying multiple lasers hovering well above a boat as a CiWS.

@f1reguy587 2 жыл бұрын

Lasers have a place, few million on the table if you patent something 😅

@chuckecheese4267 2 жыл бұрын

Everytime I see an aircraft carrier I think of the movie Top Gun. Both are complementary of each other.

@ThatCarGuy 2 жыл бұрын

Best navy in the world by far. It's amazing how the US has 11 super carriers and 9 light carriers we call amphibious assault ships(Wasp and America class) for a total of 20. Crazy how hard they are to sink too, the US couldn't sink the USS America for 4 weeks and had to scuttle it. "The U.S. Navy knows this from experience. In 2005, the Navy itself targeted the decommissioned carrier America in order to determine just how much punishment the vessel could withstand before slipping beneath the waves. "The ship was pummeled by explosions both above and below the waterline," The War Zone reporter Tyler Rogoway explained in 2018. "After nearly four weeks of these activities, the carrier was scuttled. On May 14, 2005, the vessel's stern disappeared below the waterline and the ship began its voyage to the seafloor." "America stood up to four weeks of abuse and only succumbed to the sea after demolition teams scuttled the ship on purpose once and for all, it's clear that America was built to sustain heavy damage in combat and still stay afloat."

@GVK-jm9sg 2 жыл бұрын

I thought the other 9 were helicopter carriers

@ThatCarGuy 2 жыл бұрын

@@GVK-jm9sg Yes and no. The America class holds: "They can carry about 20 to 25 AV-8B, F-35Bs, or a mixture of the two" The Wasp class holds: "The size of the air combat element varies depending on the operation: a standard air combat element consists of six Harriers or six F-35B Lightning IIs and four AH-1W /Z Super Cobra /Viper attack helicopters for attack and support, twelve Ospreys and four Super Stallions for transport, and three or four Bell UH-1Y Venom utility helicopters.[10][8] For a full assault, the air group can be maxed out at 22 Ospreys, while a Wasp operating in the sea control or 'Harrier carrier' or 'Lightning carrier' configuration carries 20 Harriers or F-35Bs (though some ships of the class have operated as many as 24 Harriers), supported by six Sikorsky SH-60 Seahawk helicopters for anti-submarine warfare."

@john-ze7eu 2 жыл бұрын

They don't have to sink it.. A missile or two hits the deck... It's a floating tin can

@ThatCarGuy 2 жыл бұрын

@@john-ze7eu You act like it's easy to get passed a CSG which has around 1000 missiles. Carriers are one of the most defended assets in the world, combined with they have two catapults meaning you need to disable both or in the wasp/America class case they carry f35b's which don't need any runway...

@john-ze7eu 2 жыл бұрын

@@ThatCarGuy and completely untested vs hypersonic missiles. Very likely an outdated and expensive concept. Hell, a tiny Swedish diesel sub pretty much took out an entire US carrier group all by itself in a recent war game. And yes, the US was concerned with that - we proceeded to lease that sub from them for 2 years. That's embarrassing

@nhlsgreatestfan3222 2 жыл бұрын

I’m from Canada and I am so thankful The USA is are neighbour. Just wish are country would spend some money on are defence spending instead of social programs. IT SUCKS!!!!!

@rajenpapang6455 2 жыл бұрын

GOD Bless the All US military,,,,

@zhutupac6682 2 жыл бұрын

美国从来不跟有核武器的国家打

@bunnyonabunwithagunnicepun5689 2 жыл бұрын

U.S: "Okay, so, we have devastating battleships, and extremely effective aircraft... What if we just... Combined them...?" See you in 50 years when we have planes that can drop submarines into the ocean, that can then launch VTOL strike drones. Seriously, I love these things!

@robertburton9473 2 жыл бұрын

I served on a carrier in the pacific for near 4 years this carrier had the best menu of any of the carriers, there was one thing, If I went out on deck and looked up into the sky, if I saw no albatross or seagulls in the air, it seems when that happened we had chicken on the menuI was not the only crewman to notice that. Also we saw duty in war zone. With great success. Also carriers have more defenses than just being a very large ship. Carriers are multiple hulled ships hits by enemy arms do not penitrate but 1 0r 2 hulls. The ship can then be balanced by flooding comparative areas on opposite side and steam to a repair facilitie. .

@aliasfred 2 жыл бұрын

Targeted "EMP" weapon would be great.

@ichabodon 2 жыл бұрын

Go, the US navy.

@andrekuhr8036 2 жыл бұрын

Maybe 10 or so amphibious ships with vertical take offs say about 50.000 tons instead of a 100.000 ton of air caft carrier . More ships, save money plus less vunerble?

@landonwood3977 2 жыл бұрын

If the US goes to war with any large, industrial nation, its natural to assume that ships will be lost. The thing people forget is that any enemy would need a means of delivery. Strike fighters would be met with the carrier wing well beyond the ideal range to release their payloads. Submarines would be detected by escorts (especially if the group is on full alert and at battlestations). A ship based attack would mean that the ship would need to bypass air defense patrols and the strike group escorts to launch. Even then, inteception is most likely. Even with hypersonics, the missile would have to calculate the path of the carrier (which would be impossible if it was executing evasive manuevers) and that would mean the missile would likely miss as the time for mid flight adjustment would be dramatically shorter. This, in turn with the strike group using EW or even spoofing the radar on the warheads guidance system would make it even harder. In summation, a fully armed and fully alert strike group would be VERY difficult to stop. When you factor in other services contributing to any operation, there would be a serious fog of war for any enemy. This is why China is shit out of luck. If the carrier group wont enter a kill zone but can remain at a standoff distance, it can operate alongside B52s, B1s, B2s or even aircraft from the USAF to truly pack a mean punch. The strike group would also likely be accompanied by newer technologies that take into account what the US knows about Chinas newer technology.

@noahway13 2 жыл бұрын

Valid argument, but I disagree on some minor points. Hyper-sonics are improving by the day. Just because China does not have an accurate one yet, does not mean that others don't. Cruise missiles are getting so much range that you don't need plane or ship-based launches. And these missiles are being taught to recognize certain ships, just a different kind of 'facial recognition'. None of these videos I've seen even cover long range smart torpedoes. And considering the cost and capabilities of a carrier, a nation could send 200 missiles, torpedoes all at once and many will get thru. And no one will even mention or game-plan for nukes. I live in Norfolk, VA, and I have a toe in the water on the topic, not just a casual observer. And to myself and others, many are coming around to the idea that Super Carriers are putting too many eggs in one basket. PLUS, I'd say in a decade, all planes will be turned into drones. The Air Force has a squad of F-16's in Florida that it automated, and they can take-off, dogfight (and win) and then land. Look up QF-16 on KZfaq. And most of those videos are 8 years old, think about what they can do now. Anyway, sorry reply went so long.

@omarionbayley9721 2 жыл бұрын

Who the fuck is reading that?

@adamspeier585 2 жыл бұрын

No internet provider no data breaches

@thebookwasbetter3650 Жыл бұрын

Gen Xer here - Go ahead kids - name that video game. 3:58

@BlueRidgeGuy 2 жыл бұрын

I seldom comment on KZfaq vids, but damn, your stuff is so good! The narrator is top shelf & the content is always both interesting & educational. Thanks for providing such a great view of our incredible men & women & machines that protect us & others from those that want to do harm to us.

@zhutupac6682 2 жыл бұрын

塔利班表示不服

@kevinschuurmans7738 8 ай бұрын

Totally disagree!!

@amincasanova 2 жыл бұрын

God bless America 🇺🇸🇺🇸

@Cheka__ Жыл бұрын

They tape bubble wrap to the inside of the hull. This cushions against impacts.

@mrkca222 2 жыл бұрын

You need to review the chosen title to this because it has ZERO to do with defense against missiles etc... 🤔

@OutnBacker Жыл бұрын

Given the advances in CHinese missile technology and the large amounts of munitions Chinese Type 055's carry, I tihnk the the most important thing v- and the cheapest and fastest thing to do, id immedeatly install 5 Phalanx on each side of all the carriers and double+ their magazines. I would also double the Phalanx mounts on ALL vessels that currently have them. There's going tobe too many incoming missiles for the US Navy to deal with.

@mattfavaloro350 2 жыл бұрын

Speaking of missile defense of the aircraft carrier I have a question? The hatches that keep the missiles secured and away from the elements that it looks like they have either or small explosive to blow the doors off or some other mechanism to eject them from the front and the rear of the missile what happens if that hatch doesn't eject properly? Would that missile still fire? If that missile does fire I know it wouldn't explode because all of the modern missiles have I set timer or distance that they have to travel before they arm themselves after being fired but could it not damage the launcher? If there was enough function in the hatches would that disable the missile from launching? Just seeing the image of the missiles firing I wondered what if don't know if anybody has the actual answer.

@mrking7608 2 жыл бұрын

Everything looks good on paper but they didnt mention the Aussie and Swedish and Chinese subs that took out carriers in exercises.

@clickhereforshowittoothers2184 2 жыл бұрын

First plan on the Georgia Guidestones is for 93% of all people to be disappeared. (That includes blacks, whites, Mexicans, Asians, Christians...and even many Democrats.)

@jinpark1092 2 жыл бұрын

Powerful megawatt Laser weapons should be enough to knock out Chinese hypersonic missles. . .

@TmanjoeR 2 жыл бұрын

i couldnt imagine being the drone pilot that had to land one on a carrier for the first time.

@noahway13 2 жыл бұрын

Is this a joke or not? Not sure, but I believe the drone is automated with cameras and sensors to land itself.

@dwaynejohnson9554 2 жыл бұрын

Cool

@Conn30Mtenor 2 жыл бұрын

Every war is fought with the previous war in mind. For our sake I hope that the USN is thinking on this.

@jamescole3152 2 жыл бұрын

Don't forget the shields.

@JJ-rf7dg 2 жыл бұрын

Go Navy, Hooyah!!

@goldmembere-commerce8765 2 жыл бұрын

Hi Allllllllll there showssssss

@user-ow2fo1xr9l 2 жыл бұрын

Improve the aircraft carrier's the ability attack and defense, generally it's R&D of cutting edge technology; however, cost management, it's even more difficult, it's about design and improve current bueracratic system to deal with the complexity of human nature.

@denispatachi2247 2 жыл бұрын

I. Will. be. a. Playlist

@felixmeyer1972 2 жыл бұрын

Wir sollten eine größere Anzahl kleiner Träger haben als weniger große oder sogar größere Träger als heute. Ein Verlust einiger großer Fluggesellschaften könnte lähmend sein, und ich würde in einem Peer-Konflikt den Verlust mehrerer Fluggesellschaften erwarten. Defensiv sollten Sie darauf achten, UUMV zu entwickeln, das einen größeren Bogen und eine größere Distanz für das Situationsbewusstsein schaffen könnte. Die Träger haben derzeit keine wirksame Verteidigung gegen Hyperschallraketen, die wirksam wäre. Sollen kleinere Träger eingesetzt werden, müssten sie dennoch genauso viel elektrische Leistung erzeugen können wie die größten Stromträger.

@lightningmcqueen181 2 ай бұрын

WHY?! My 1st Combat Deployment to Iraq 05 thru 07 (17months) Just as we got extended one of the Wives sent us a "FUTURE WEAPONS" episode that had our STRYKER'S , WITH EVERY VARIATION MADE,on the show!! They would ahow a Digital X-Ray of the outside & inside layout where EACH individual soldier sat inside these vehicles, our capabilities etc,etc... ALL WHILE WE WERE STILL A BRAND NEW PLATFORM..My Brigade being only the 3rd Stryker Unit in the Military. And all three S.B.C.T. were exceeding ALL EXPECTATIONS! & Combating the negative publicity our vehicles initially got prior to Adopting the vehicle.... By the time Strykers made it into Afghanistan, they were fully aware of How and where they could exploit the vehicles weaknesses... Unfortunately, their leadership was poor as well so they lost quite a few guys & a few of my friends who had PCS to that New Brigade due to experience..... I DO NOT BELIEVE THE AMERICAN PUBLIC & ESPECIALLY THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY DOES NOT NEED TO KNOW WHAT WE ARE CAPABLE OF... SO W H Y DO WE C O N T I N U E TO DO THESE TYPES OF VIDEOS EVEN EXIST?! Makes no sense

@cornbreadfedkirkpatrick9647 2 жыл бұрын

LIt, what about resonance?

@echo_049 Жыл бұрын

Why don’t we just make a floating fortress? Kinda like a base in the middle of the ocean 😂

@semco72057 2 жыл бұрын

Those ships are floating cities and have to be protected by the rest of the fleet and that is where the other ships and submarines come in. They launch missiles at enemy aircraft coming too close to the fleet and knock them or missiles out of the sky.

@infinitotourismo Жыл бұрын

Go Army.

@ericclausen6772 2 жыл бұрын

Rebuild the Nimitz class carriers

@mr_villan 2 жыл бұрын

is this WATOP SECOND KZfaq CHANNEL 🤔🤔

@anacondaeunectes1854 2 жыл бұрын

Please explain what is a inner ear navy?". Thank you.

@Kitchguy 2 жыл бұрын

What the US needs to do is come up with stealth drones undetectable and smaller. If you build many of them you can launch 10 or 20 at a time towards a target so it's hard for the enemy to get them all. At least a few would get through enemy lines to hit their target.

@noahway13 2 жыл бұрын

But the same tactics will be used against carriers. Overload the system with cheap, but ever-increasing lethal missiles.

@fredsmith4134 2 жыл бұрын

unsinkable like the titanic ?

@seriystrelcov7754 2 жыл бұрын

in Afghanistan, aircraft carriers performed very well

@zhutupac6682 2 жыл бұрын

世上没有不沉的航母

@GrxyWzrd 2 жыл бұрын

I just wanna mow the opposition down wit that super gangster Gatlin gun

@arazduhoki225 2 жыл бұрын

God bless America

@Christer885 2 жыл бұрын

👍

@necronlord52 2 жыл бұрын

How can you explain the fact, that one shot from Ukrainian "Stugna P" costs 20K USD, while one shot from similarly efficient "Javelin" costs about 1M USD? Here goes your cost efficiency.

@DanielBrown-sn9op 2 жыл бұрын

Greed. And effectiveness

@yoda55555 2 жыл бұрын

Because they are made in the US of A. ❤️ ❤️ ❤️

@burninpowder8503 2 жыл бұрын

What happens if a 2000lb missile going Mach 20 hits it?

@howardhdavidson 2 жыл бұрын

Carrier’s will soon be a thing of the past.Long range Drones/Missiles will supersede them, they are now vulnerable to submarines,hypersonic missiles,and large airborne attacks.

@tbyrn444 2 жыл бұрын

Full-length flight deck?

@ghostmofo5829 4 ай бұрын

Yeah. It's only 1000 feet long. Shorty.

@armyquite4348 2 жыл бұрын

Negara USA sahaja yang mempunyai kapal induk yang banyak

@adamkennedyripon Жыл бұрын

Don't forget hypersonic weapons. They need defensive and offensive hypersonic weapons.

@kamiabadi4554 2 жыл бұрын

Reason 1: Most powerful cuntry in the world. No need for other resons

@sigmundlisiza9484 2 жыл бұрын

Please cut the water noice in the Background :)

@dack4545 2 жыл бұрын

Above water defence or offence is lame underwater gives you a certain degree of Stealth over above sea level military equipment

@MrMarkhall1 2 жыл бұрын

These guys have been watching too many Star Wars films.

@franciscosamath12 6 ай бұрын

I feel like the other war ships should be farther apart

@MrMarkhall1 2 жыл бұрын

Pearl Harbour 2,the plot goes something like hypersonic missiles destroy all of Americas aircraft carriers.

@1Alphaofallalphas Жыл бұрын

My opinion, if the carriers are targeted. I would definitely aim for all land bases, including shipyards, military academics, every floating vessels, the capital, government buildings and Xi with entire family, it’s my opinion of course.

@DanielBrown-sn9op 2 жыл бұрын

Our fleets worst enemy.......Greed.

@alexandersan1073 2 жыл бұрын

MARINE SWAT ETC. YOU GET ME! YAY. TEXAS HOLD EM UP TILL THE SUN SHHINES. LOL

@whiteandnerdytuba 2 жыл бұрын

Didn't our carrier die quickly in the last war game?

@clickhereforshowittoothers2184 2 жыл бұрын

First plan on the Georgia Guidestones is for 93% of all people to be disappeared. (That includes blacks, whites, Mexicans, Asians, Christians...and even many Democrats.)

@ThatCarGuy 2 жыл бұрын

How many did they win before losing? Anytime a nation beats the US in a wargame it's huge(Look when France finally beat a f22 in a wargame) where it had the advantage and got to start from the rear. The UK royal marines beat the US marines recently, why do you think that is? Rarely ever do wargames start neutral but to try to learn how to get out of a bad situation, which goes for all nations, hence why war games dont matter. Look at the old Gotland submarine war game as another example, the US was in shallow water and couldn't move, where a carrier would never be unless docked. We do these games to learn what to do in the worst possible scenario. Otherwise it looks like this in 2018, the Battle of Khasham where 40 US special ops killed 200-300 Russians. Battle was so large F22s were called in... There is audio and some limited video on youtube if you want to look or want links, source: "According to the U.S. military's official statement, around 10 p.m. local time on the night of 7 February 2018, a force of 500 pro-government fighters consisting of local militiamen, government soldiers, Iranian-trained Afghan Shia fighters, and reportedly Russian contractors launched an assault on a Syrian Democratic Forces headquarters near the town of Khasham, located on the Euphrates River in Syria. Supported by T-72 and T-55 tanks, the pro-government troops first shelled the SDF base with artillery, mortars, and rockets in what U.S. military officials described as a "coordinated attack." Around 20-30 shells landed within 500 meters of the headquarters. According to the U.S. military, the presence of U.S. special operations personnel in the targeted base elicited a response by U.S.-led coalition aircraft, including AC-130 gunships, F-15E Strike Eagle fighter jets, unmanned aerial vehicles (MQ-9), AH-64 Apache attack helicopters, B-52s, and F-22s"

@monicapierce4088 2 жыл бұрын

Happiness 😁❤️🇺🇲

@lauriedooker1031 2 жыл бұрын

With vertical lift craft why do we need huge aircraft carriers ?

@2Sage-7Poets Жыл бұрын

the problems are not those ordinary missiles.. but missiles loaded with nuclear warhead..

@user-nl5md6cg9u 2 жыл бұрын

BUDIES how much do you guys need

@mightymoyan4788 2 жыл бұрын

Can I get one of these close-in systems for my neighbors tiny ass dog?

@lionelphillip8763 2 жыл бұрын

Mmmmmmm............ maybe have them separate into 1/4s or.......... phasing tech so energy beams , rockets middles etc pass through..... teleportation technologies move it out of harms way just some thoughts 💭!

@alexandersan1073 2 жыл бұрын

DAD SAID LIVE TOGETHER DIE TOGETHER. EACH CARRIER US NAVY ONLY (FOR NOW) GETS A DEATH STAR. CELEBRATE =)

@mohawksniper79 2 жыл бұрын

lazers. I wonder are they in use in space as well. with all those satellites they sent up in the last years must have a purpose and better internet I don't believe is what they are doing I mean they were able to do that with 5 or 6 satellites why were they sending 80 at a time up there over the past years from the defense force. i couldn't understand at the time but now it makes sense 🧐

@dinola3268 2 жыл бұрын

Submarine? 💥

@RHR-221b 2 жыл бұрын

@@LoadOShite *Das Boot* ... 👍 Stay free, L. R 🍻 😎 🎲 🌠

@KK-ol5ov 2 жыл бұрын

They need lasers

@kanlu5199 2 жыл бұрын

Lasers are too expensive and too slow to build for USA

@bertiewooster3326 2 жыл бұрын

Hey looks like you guys were right "" That car guy"" just can't handle an accurate and balanced reply from someone who served 36 years whereas he's either still at senior school dreaming of going in the USN but is unlikely to pass the medical or entrance exam or just reading reports that he cannot grasp or comprehend!!

@noahway13 2 жыл бұрын

*OMG*! Bertie! Ask Jeeves what we should do! Seriously, are you British? Where are you from? I'm living where all these ships are built and maintained-- around Virginia Beach. I listen to P.G. Wodehouse to drift to sleep most nights.

@Kelv_Nganga Жыл бұрын

chaina wondering how to destroy it :)

@JoseHernandez-lw7re 2 жыл бұрын

S400 is intheway

@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723 2 жыл бұрын

Ahhhhh,......they have planes and are accompanied by destroyers & frigates,

@gen.barnakey__ 7 ай бұрын

I can't listen to this military salesman in a matter how interesting the topic looks. Click.

@swiftusmaximus5651 2 жыл бұрын

LMAO, Carriers havent had to defend themselves since 1945

@simondsouza6348 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks For the Flirt Aircraft Carrier. Well I Worked Airfield With AirWork Ltd Co .I'M SIMON UBAL D'SOUZA Praise Lord Jesus Christ Amen Allelulia.

@goldmembere-commerce8765 2 жыл бұрын

Do dissssssss

@ivanostellato9478 2 жыл бұрын

hey guys .. want to buy time travel engines and anti gravity tech?? how about faster than light propulsion systems both mechanical and non mechanically based ?? guys ... u there guys ???