pay to win 40$... too much

bjir org indo

bang bang

Bling Bang

If you go right it, you lose in cqb. If you start with an ambush, you win 9 out of 10 times.

That’s what I’m thinking too

Missile bloom = love.

It's called a guided missile battleship, they have cruisers too. They're devastating.

​@@OhhGeeehes calling it an arsenal ship bcuz real world US navy had a future ship design like this that was eventually canceled due to the price of it.

It's cute that you think they deemed something too expensive. They have ALL kinds of stuff that they don't want us to know about.

@@OhhGeee Im just telling you what the video said about why it was discontinued.🤷

​@@brianawilk285 Though Japan and South Korea are looking into the concept.

how does a small frigate like gorshkov can fit a fricking nuclear ICBM inside

@@Loli4lyf idk

Clearly inspired by the Zumwalt class ship.

@@AleksanderKomentator Tumblehome hull design is the Future of Navy ship design....

buff its grenade launcher to 1x3 slot maybe, hard to counter torpedo spamming nowday especially poseidon...

Tbh the only people I see who complain about it are trash players who can't use it right and just charge in. Literally skill issue. Imagine being so bad at the game you want one of the strongest ships in the game to be buffed. ☠️

I guess it's not that much about skill but more about what you get for 20k artcoin, I mean, it's a really good ship but still worse in every aspect that Moscow or ageis which have the same prices so I'd just get those over the Hampshire. Yes, Hampy has better chances of hitting at long ranges but that still gets outclassed by someone that knows how to pre aim with a normal bb cannon, plus, all other bb's have secondary cannons and better aa, while this has just 4 worse versions of the Marlin autocannon. Definetly devastating at long ranges but nothing really compared to other market bb's in terms of pure damage and versatility.

@@Endel-ionI bought aegis back in days for 20k and about week ago sold for 35k old buddy cant keep up now. Long range is what matters you hit ships before they get close. Before buffs at point blank range hampshire vs aegis were about whos better player now yesterday i literally ate some chinese try hard sweaty aegis in close range. Btw even missouri now is better than moscow pretty sure at direct fight old yamato aswell claps

@@naikiklis well, you can hit just as reliable with ageis/any other bb than with Hampshire at long ranges, you just need a bit more skill at pre-aiming, about Moscow VS Missouri i highly doubt it, maybe In a 1v1 Missouri has a chance of winning but overall Moscow still remains way more versatile against many threats. Also yes, range matters but not as much as you might think, average engagements still happen between 5-8km so it's pretty rare to exceed the 10km line, unless you go opposite direction and camp at the maps edge.

My Moscow's six rocket launcher: Hi.XD

@@benjaminli4235 sometimes it need luck bro, poseidon durability is 60000, and UET-1 durability 10000 - 4salvo per fired, so total 100k durability....need help from teammate some situation

What if sws comes with 4x spearfish Infront of belgorod 😂

@@benjaminli4235 Aegis appears. Say hello to my little friend

F126 with ASW 🔥

agreed. this is what our property taxes should be going to

💀

@@capitandelaswafflesss5351🤨 what does the skull emoji meaning that you sent?

@@valcanoman1829 just imagine that kind of weapons in a modern warfare

The USN almost did with the proposed BBX Arsenal Ship (same hull program that got them the DDX Zumwalt, but it was all missiles, no cannons), but the Cold War ended and budgets evaporated & doctrine changed, almost caused the Zumwalt class to be outright cancelled too.

Won't happen. Too big an expensive. Although Japan is constructing two 20,000 ton Arsenal Ships which they claim to be destroyers to skirt politics. And South Korea is building 3 Arsenal Ships of the 8,000 ton range. But these lack rail guns. Also from what I know of future US Naval policy, it's going in the direction smaller vessels such as Corvettes. In case you're wondering, 80 Corvettes are planned. What's cool about these Corvettes is they're going to be the main bodies of fleets of Drone warships. In fact, I design vessels known as Corvettes. And if you're going as me to draw up the prints for a battleship, I won't because nobody is going to build the design.

Wait next month for global release

​@@Fiocing1how you have got this?

He's gets early access from devs

​@@Fiocing1PC requirements?

friendly fire is not a feature here

USS Massachutsset

​@@Fiocing1Massachusetts**

RF Moscow

yes putting that many big ballistic missile on one ship is really bad idea it will explode in chain reaction that's why we put on sub

Missile destroyers have VLS tubes like this, and the days of naval fights within gun range of each other are pretty much over. Generally a naval engagement is going to be fought over the horizon using aircraft, anti ship missiles, CIWS and SM interceptors. No one uses battleships anymore because they’re too big, slow and vulnerable for the modern battlefield

@@mikalcobbs9402 battleships are much smaller and faster than carrier what make them obsolete is there gun there gun max range can only reach 50km while anti capital ship missile can go over 1000km

@@drsm7947 the advent of aircraft and torpedoes made battleships obsolete. The US hasn’t produced a battleship since the Iowa class which last saw service in the gulf war and are all now either museum ships or scrap metal. A harpoon missile has a range of 278km not 1000, aircraft like the F/A-18 hornet carrying ASGM’s can fly from a carrier from 500 miles/804km away launched the anti-ship payload and return to their carrier. Not to mention the US operates 11 nuclear carriers with air wings of around 70-80 aircraft per ship in coordination with their strike groups which can comprise destroyers, cruisers, frigates, submarines and various supply elements.

@@mikalcobbs9402 also some of missile cruiser specially those Russian missile cruiser are same size and weight as a battleships also some anti capital missile can go over like 1000km range and its currently BGM-109 Tomahawk, BrahMos-II and Nirbhay

go setting > Sound > Scroll down > Use Event

yes

Aegis is better on full on engagements, Hampshire is better for passing by and do 1 round of damage

padahal kapal ini enak loh

@@Fiocing1 di akhir live banting kursi astaga kaget gw 🗿🗿

yes im buying in antoher account

ini versi PICI

Tester

@@Fiocing1 ah ok, is it possible to apply for this?

i wish someone could tell me

Part of it is that modern warships are so wildly capable that battles would last hours and if we went strictly realistic, anyone who picks Americans would win, even if we went based on paper capabilities and not real world capabilities. We need to have more arcade-y style games to make it fair and balanced and not take half a day for a single battle.

There are more realistic naval warfare games, like Sea Power: Naval Combat in the Missile Age. There are other simulators available too, if you just bother to Google. But for an multiplayer game that's similar to this but more "realistic" in terms of damage & dynamics, then War Thunder's Naval part of the game is that.

@@CheapSushi War Tinder is just like World of Warships. Unrealistic, full of problems.

114k

Massachusetts

now...

@@Fiocing1 pengumuman GA ya dimana ???