Thanks 😊🌱

Sounds good 👌

🙏🏻❤️

thanks ❤️❤️

Always welcome

🙏🏻❤️

Yes, this item works. thanks

Thanks for your comment. 💕 You need enscape 3.5.6 and higher and vray 6.2

With the help of this transition, you can use the full capabilities of vray to get the output.😊

❤❤

Thank you for your comment. This comparison is done in cpu and basic and beginner settings. In the following comparisons, we will consider more parameters for comparison. 🌱

Great point!

Thank you for your comment. Yes, it definitely is. We will definitely make a video about this. ❤️😊

good bro

but vray 6.2 too fast now

If you do with Bucket sampler and Lightcache+Irradiance Map, then the quality of realism will be far worse than corona, even less than chaosvantage. That method was only used 5 years ago

thanks for your comment

Thanks buddy 🤍🌱

Thanks 🤍

Yes, it cannot be ignored. It is true.

Absolutely 👍. Thanks for sharing your opinion.

Thanks for your comment 🤍 This comparison is done under the same conditions and with the default criteria. Definitely, with more changes and the passage of time, I can reach the right output. In Corona, you can see the output of the work with a faster speed and reach the result.

Yes, this item was introduced in Chaos Unboxed. 💕💕

Yes, you are absolutely right

Thank you for your complete and expert explanation. ☺️❤️🙏🏻

you can enable path rendering in v-ray (experimental feature still)

Thanks for your comment 😌❤️

Yes ofcourse.

CPU Intel 12700k GPU RTX 3070Ti Memory 32

​@@MIMVizStudio Corona time is with cpu cores and vray with gpu corse? Strage result... gpu should be faster... thanks

no my friend Corona is faster if we put both engines on cpu. If you pay attention, the gpu in Viri is one of its most attractive features.

True

Yes, this is very good news.

Thanks for sharing your experience 🤍🙏🏻

First of all, thank you for your comment. These two rendering engines have many similarities. vray provides us with more possibilities in general. Of course, Corona is getting closer to vray day by day. I myself switched from Vray to Corona, but currently I use each depending on the needs of the project. In general, learning both is very convenient.

@@MIMVizStudio ok great...thank you for the valuable reply..🙂

Thank you for your comment. You spell it right and this is the policy of this company so that it can have specific customers for each rendering engine.

thanks for your comment

In the future, we may produce its video

Thanks for your comment and your explanation 🙏🏻😌

Thanks for your comment 🤍🌱

Thanks for your comment ❤️🌱

Thank you for your comment.

vray has a lot of power in other cases and more control in the render setup, which was mentioned in the summary video, and in the future we will provide a video with more details.😌🙏🏻🌱

ai is developing a lot and is scaring many people day by day. And we must try to accept it and add it to our work.

Please express your opinion fully and with reasons🙂🙏🏻

how much experience you have ?@@MIMVizStudio

how much your experience about rendering field @@MIMVizStudio

The recorded video is a comparison between the mentioned items. And during the video, it has been said many times that both rendering engines have their own advantages and the user can choose it according to his needs.

Our team has 7 years of experience in the field of rendering. Again, tell me something that you think can be useful for others. Thank you for your opinion

Thank you for sharing your opinion with us. We hope that in the future, the problems of both rendering engines will decrease and create a user-friendly environment for everyone.

On the contrary, I feel using blender is counterproductive to me. Importing from sketchup often gives me inconsistent accuracy (missing objects, improper quads, etc). And what makes me want to stick to 3ds max is the ability to group objects flawlessly and separate them by layers. In blender, you can use container, but putting objects in container takes lot of time. In my projects, grouping is a must, I have to make around 300+ groups on average before I start working on my scene. Also, the ability to access multiple professional 3d assets such as 3dsky, bendtrade, etc. is what separate professional archviz artist from hobbyist using blender.

Thank you for your comment and opinion🙂@@sambagyarta

@@sambagyarta Yeah I agree on the sketchup part but a good archviz artist will never look towards SketchUp other than just to import some assets which work quiet seamlessly with newer versions of sketchup importer plugin. I have never used grouping so I wont know how that works or make the life easier but I think most of those can be taken care of with the collections and also parenting. Different workflows I guess, but what I like is the ability to work without even moving my mouse to fiddle with the tabs and buttons and that clumpsy autodesk UI. Its the UI that bugs me the most and it just gives me headache. Also having a huge library is good but its also so much time consuming to select the objects. But blender is also catching up pretty fast with blenderkit and other libraries. Also the professional libraries have already started giving out their blender versions so that's not much of a big deal. So lets enjoy what we have build the best we can. All these opinions are my personal. I started by learning 3ds max but was quickly bored with so many windows, tabs and buttons and the UI that I had to drop and move to Cinema4d. And after that to blender. But its good that Vray is coming to blender too. Hopefully we will be able to enjoy the best of both the worlds.

i agree woth you with the interface of 3d max , thats why i use c4d :) and sometimes blender for modeling