Mahamurkh yeh prani , 😂 apne mannn ke Mahabharata likh de aur aap log bewakoof bhi ban gaye

@@roganstone4979 or tune toh soni putra karna dekh ke seekha hai naa 😅😆

@@roganstone4979 😮ll😮p😅o😅

1:06:52 by mistake she said Arjun, it was said by Fake Lower Caste Sut Putr Karn, thank you

The word she used is itihaas. Literal translation would be history but the word itihaas has more depth and meaning, not just a narrative of the past.

​@@rajeshwarikarthikeyan5941 😊wwwwww 😊😘

Sachai bta rhe ho to puri btao na unke real name se bulao na unko.

Mahabharat Is Not Our History It Is Our Past Present Future All Mahabharat Is Happening All Around Us

Thanks for donation sir 💙🙏

👏👏

Ha toh sab ka sab ek tarfa story bana do har jagah bhagwan hi ache dikhao .bhsdk walo esa he toh ye mahabharat ramayan dekhenhi kyu .tumhare god he great he band kardo kuch dekhna ,┐(‘～`;)┌.castist racist logo kabhi tumne apni behen ki bhai ki shadi down caste me ki he .?.aaj char warna nahihe char caste nahihe According to constitution there are more than 2000 castes .koi bhi sadhu guru maharaj kabhi bhi intercaste marriage k liye protsahan nahi deta .agar koi intercaste ki baat kare toh tum logo k dukan band ho jayege .bade aye gyan dene wale kapti hindu

1:06:52 by mistake she said Arjun, it was said by Fake Lower Caste Sut Putr Karn, thank you

Thanks s10 edr bhi bhej do jab mare pass ayega m aggy kisi ko dekar jauga jab Malik de bhai ji tq

Agreed🙏

#sattology pls watch this also. Research base.

Great and clear narration by Ami. She is no doubt an asset to our country. Must be awarded by the Government.

kzfaq.info/sun/PLzT1yw_wugHB8lcho3VBnkkMwl36KwThb 🙏 Hare Krishna Hari bol 👍🙏😀

There are some wrong information in this debate regarding meat eating. There is no meat eating in Mahabharata and Ramayan. Do read sanskrit to hindi translation there is a word in Sanskrit called Maasam, that means fruits inside part....there is no mention of meat or fish at all. All these English translation done by Max Muller and his companions. There are 46 letters in Sanskrit and 26 letters in English. How can someone translate Sanskrit in English. Ye sab Kiya gya sirf hinduon ko badnaam krne ke liye 😡😡😡

I agreed

@@durgeshprasadroutray5289 dissagrred agar jhuth sunne ka Sauk hai toh sunno

@@roganstone4979 She's quoting from Ved Vyasa's Mahabharat, how is it a jhuth?

@@dakshsharma1703 wahi toh problem hai Bhai yeh ved vyas ki Mahabharata se bol rahe hai , jo approx 500sal Pehle nast ho gye thee 😂😂😂. Aur tumlog aise jhooton ke baat maan lete ho , Aur abhi jo version hai vo mostly vaisanpaine ke hai ( student of ved vyas , who used 2000 more shloka's to glorify pandav's, like virat war )...... If you really support our culture and heritage and warrior's which our history has build's you should ask her questions not me 🙏🙏

@@roganstone4979 What's she's telling is inn accordance to Bori which is the most accurate so doesn't matter, she's mostly right. Also Pandavas are the protagonist of Ved vyasa mahabharat too, Arjuna is the main character of Mahabharat!

Agree and people rather than reading real puranas they more believe serials and portray Karn as hero and Arjun as a loser 🤦🤦I was not sure bt always confused about his character and was more inclined towards Arjun... ❤️

That is too toxic serial, stay away from that.

IF KARNA WAS NOT POWERFULL WHY KRISHNA SAVED ARJUN FORM HIM ? HE SAVED ARJUN FORM NAGASTRA, INDRA ASTHRA.

Yes truth will prevail at last

There could be simple wrong interpretations. But BR Chopra did an excellent service to India with the show. We should never undermine his contribution.

Neither is her interpretation real. She and the host outright hate Karna and are hardcore praising arjun Draupadi. Karna in Mahabharat is shown as a positive character only. Nothing is going to change it.

@@siddarth3955 yeah! Would have been better if he brought one more scholar of Mahabharata with a different pov who could ask counter questions... This wasn't vaad. This was just a narrative and one pov.

@@bu11ymaguire He wouldn't. He hates Karna so why would he do that? He had previously also insulted Karn. Also this so called author cherry picked verses and is acting as if Karna is negative character and saying 'I am not anti Karna, Vyasa Mahabharat is'. This one verse from Vyasa Mahabharat destroys her argument: """Thus fell that hero who was a Kalpa tree unto those swarms of birds represented by suitors. Solicited by suitors he always said, "I give" but never the words "I have not!" The righteous always regarded him as a righteous person."" -Karna Parva, Section-94, Vyasa Mahabharat. Also her claim that Karna wasn't low caste or casteism didn't exist just to belittle his humiliations are also false. Karna was insulted for his caste in many places, once he even tells Bhishma not to insult him as 'low born' since he has always followed practises or Kshatriyas alone. All in all, it's just another dumb writer with her own interpretation. Not just this, there are also places where Pandavas actions were extremely questionable like Arjun burning Khandiva forest. In actual epic it was basically a genocide of all the innocent naga people and animals in the forest but somehow we aren't supposed to question it. Any person with two brain cells would be shocked at the description of the genocide mentioned in the text but we are still supposed to accept unquestionably like abrahamic faith. She also spoke as if Karna abandoned Duryodhan with gandharvas while in reality Karna destroyed half the Gandharva army and was overcome with illusion, all his weapons and chariot was destroyed, etc. That's when he retreated and the so called gandharvas were themselves sent by Arjuna's father Indra to humiliate Kauravas and protect Pandavas. Arjun also did the same thing when Dwarka robbers attacked but she wouldn't mention that. I would only suggest, read actual epic. You will find such KZfaq channels or authors everywhere. This particular author even seems to totally take her knowledge from Quora. She also said Satyaki defeated Karna but it never happened. As per BORI CE, on 14th day Karna made Satyaki satyaki chariotless. Then the latter got on lord Krishna's celestial chariot and he inturn made Karna chariotless, then Satyaki defeated other kaurav warriors who came there. Karna then got on a new chariot and resumed his fight with Satyaki, how is this defeat? Karna made satyaki chariotless and Satyaki did the same for Karna. These are just some small refutations of her rants against Karna. Even Arjun was defeated by many. Victory and defeat is not constant in war. That's why Mahabharat is realistic but this author has made it into Bollywood masala flick where one hero is undefeated and rest are all villains or side characters.

महाभारत में कर्ण भले दुर्योधन की तरफ था फिर भी महान था.

@@sanatangyan1056 Tv serial dekh kar bol rahe hain aap. Mahabharat padhiye. Tv serial par vishwas mat keejiye.

Par mujhe isme tark ki baat to kahi nahi bhai

Agar karn aur duryodhan itne powerfully hai jo itna bada yudhdh karwa De ye baat kujh hajam nahi hui

she is justifying casteism which is not whole truth because she must know as per vedas upper caste man (upper verna) can marry lower caste women (lower verna) , even it is allow in manusmriti, but not allow lower caste/Verna man to marry upper caste/verna women: that was discrimination: can easily seen in Mahabharata.

How do you say she is saying correct?

If any soul simply want to raise doubts without any proper authentication or reasons, on the credibility of any proven scholar, then anyone is free to do so.! Even such persons can raise doubts on Lord Krishna, Vedas Rushis like Vyasa, or latest like Swami Vivekananda and so on...! Have your own ways and pleased yourself!

@@rashmigaur617 why don't you put forth a video with information that you know of after studying the verses. Please share the link. You are being negative for the sake of it else make a specific valid point.

@@rashmigaur617 What do think BR Chopra's Mahabharat is correct?

@@andhkasur It is Ami ..... who is putting down B.R. Chopra....without any DOCUMENTED PROOF. Others have the same RIGHT to say ..... AMI is WRONG!!!.

How you reached this conclusion she has deep knowledge. I can also use same number of Sanskrit words.

👍🏼yes

@@yellowglove793 so you have ego problems with her?

Abey kuchh nahi hai. Bas dikhawa hai isko to koi bhi aasani se debunk kr skta hai

@@yellowglove793 Abey chutiye what precludes you for doing so then

she is also having foreign point of view, she is not able to hold the viewpoint that bheeshma age could be 150+ at time of mahabharat war

@@sharmaabhishek202020 Yeah, but it's very common to find people aged 102-3 years in Nepal, Bhutan and India also Bheesham lived very early when air food etc must have been great

@@shikharverma5669 bhai mein sirf yeh kehna chah raha thaa kee... 1) interviewer is giving reference to B.R Chopra mahabharat(which will never be/ and should not be, reference point of itihass) 2) writer Ami is not able to hold her view point strongly that bhishma was 150+, as before pandavas bheeshma had seen 3-4 generations of kuru rajvansh.

@Vinamra Singhai and from where leftist ideology came from mr singhal?

Mahabharata is history or mythology..? bcoz majority of people said tha Ramayana and Mahabharata is a mythology not history.

So sweet, 😂😂😂😂. Knowledge ...... A 9 class child could understand a character after reading a story, but she's just . Meri Mahabharata ,😂😂😂

misleading information dont follow her narrative, she is saying that karna donate his kavach kundal for his selfishness. Foolish girl

Ha toh sab ka sab ek tarfa story bana do har jagah bhagwan hi ache dikhao .bhsdk walo esa he toh ye mahabharat ramayan dekhenhi kyu .tumhare god he great he band kardo kuch dekhna ,┐(‘～`;)┌.castist racist logo kabhi tumne apni behen ki bhai ki shadi down caste me ki he .?.aaj char warna nahihe char caste nahihe According to constitution there are more than 2000 castes .koi bhi sadhu guru maharaj kabhi bhi intercaste marriage k liye protsahan nahi deta .agar koi intercaste ki baat kare toh tum logo k dukan band ho jayege .bade aye gyan dene wale kapti hindu

Exactly bro us time itna bada puran likhna bhot bdi bat h

its not written its actually happened you dumbo

Lol. History my a$&. Plagiarism from Homer’s Oddesey. Mixed with Persian stories

@@uprightwalkingape3483 wow chutiye you mean all those microscopic details are from Persia? Persia ke paas sand ke alawa kya tha? You are a moron of Highest order.

There are some wrong information in this debate regarding meat eating. There is no meat eating in Mahabharata and Ramayan. Do read sanskrit to hindi translation there is a word in Sanskrit called Maasam, that means fruits inside part....there is no mention of meat or fish at all. All these English translation done by Max Muller and his companions. There are 46 letters in Sanskrit and 26 letters in English. How can someone translate Sanskrit in English. Ye sab Kiya gya sirf hinduon ko badnaam krne ke liye 😡😡😡

Ur history and identity r essential for ur existence. If anyone tells u otherwise, know that either they’re a f00l or a t00l

@@abhimannukumarsingh8068 meat can be eaten only by Chatriyas if it was hunted by the individual chatriya or their family members not by others.

And as an individual one should believe in proof's and their own intellectual's and consciousness too . Rather then just believing whatever one is speaking out of his mouth . ( She very worng with many characters most with karn and Arjun)

She is very knowledgeable

@@account-su5ic tum batao tumhare hisab se gyanj vyakti ki definition

@@nitin1202 यह किसी के लिए ‘तुम’ ‘ तुम्हारा ‘ जैसे शब्दों का प्रयोग सभ्य और असभ्य होने का परिचायक होता है।

There are some wrong information in this debate regarding meat eating. There is no meat eating in Mahabharata and Ramayan. Do read sanskrit to hindi translation there is a word in Sanskrit called Maasam, that means fruits inside part....there is no mention of meat or fish at all. All these English translation done by Max Muller and his companions. There are 46 letters in Sanskrit and 26 letters in English. How can someone translate Sanskrit in English. Ye sab Kiya gya sirf hinduon ko badnaam krne ke liye 😡😡😡

@@abhimannukumarsingh8068 agree

Great idea - there are Mahabharata books for kids which are fully illustrated and available. One of them is sold by Ramakrishna Matha (you can find them online under the title' Pictorial Mahabharata' ) and another is sold by Amar Chitra Katha. Of course, these editions will vary in terms of the style, story telling, visuals and content. So would love Ami ji to create her own version which is perhaps more authentic and keeping in line with the original version.

@@AshwinSriram I don't think original version would be suitable for children

@@sarvathavicharsheel7487 kyun nahi

@@sunilbalooni5137 I don't think the elements like human staking, brutal killings or even Niyoga could be a part of children books

@@AshwinSriram thanks for sharing this. Will definitely check those out.

And also in Starplus and Suryaputra Karn

In Rashmirathi too...but I like Rashmirathi alot but not for karna but for Dinkar Ji's poetic magic.

Pandavas too and Arjun too

She is lying all about Karna

@@GoKu-yh7ks ok , than what is recounter ? pls point out from scripture of mahabharata im waiting , otherwise you r a blind blady fool not more then 🤣🤣🤣

Dhanyawad

Nala is not from Nishaada tribe, Nishadha was his Kingdom, Eklavya was from Nishaada tribe, son of Hiranyadhanu.

@@dakshsharma1703 nishadh tribe ke leader ko nishadhraj kaha jata hai. Satyavati k pita ko bhu nishadhraj kaha gaya tha, jaha tak muje yaad hai

@@jojosoni Here they distinguish between nishaad (निषाद) and nishadha (निषध). Nishadha seems to have been a kingdom. Nishaad is a forest dweller/ Hunter tribe sort of. Ekalavya was a nishaad but nala was from Nishadha kingdom. They may however have correlation. See Kingdoms participating in the Mahabharata war nishaad on the Pandava side but nishadha on the Kaurava side.

@@dakshsharma1703 i don't know how much is your answer true, but your last line is confusing. Nishadh is like caste, it's not a tribe living in a fixed place. So, did every nishadh tribe joined kaurava 🤔? Also, if there is a distinction between them, why did u use 1 word for both of them in previous comment. I'm not arguing with u here, just wondering

Exactly!

Totally different from what i believed about karn 😥😥

Satyam bruyaat, priyam Bruyaat Na vad apriyam Satya...... Have you not heard this Sanskrit shloka..???. Ridiculous

Suta Putra nhi Surya Putra Karna

@@eashmishra2960 Suta Putra, Surya Putra, Radheya ye sab naam Karna ke he hai Mahabharat mein aur inme se ek bhi naam kahi chotta nahi hai. Its your choice to call him Surya Putra and my choice to call him Suta Putra. Hope you know the meaning of Suta Putra, if not watch the video 😀

There are some wrong information in this debate regarding meat eating. There is no meat eating in Mahabharata and Ramayan. Do read sanskrit to hindi translation there is a word in Sanskrit called Maasam, that means fruits inside part....there is no mention of meat or fish at all. All these English translation done by Max Muller and his companions. There are 46 letters in Sanskrit and 26 letters in English. How can someone translate Sanskrit in English. Ye sab Kiya gya sirf hinduon ko badnaam krne ke liye 😡😡😡

@@abhimannukumarsingh8068 Hindu mass khate he khte the. Agastya muni ne ak bakri ke vesh dhari asur ko khake vadh kia tha. Veda vyas ki mata macchli pakrti thi, wo macchli to khane ke lie hi hain

bhai itna b bhavnao mai mtt baho

Arey bas kar pagley. Aakh me aasoo aa gaye 😂

Mujhe v inke face me draupadi hi nazar ati hain

एक झाल ख़रीद लें! फिर प्रशंसा भजन गाते चलिए

In most of case i disagree with her .. Inhonne karna ke daan ko jo kavch kundal daan kr rha h usse ese bataya h jasse bhut choti baat h uski importance pta nhi shayad inhe ..kavch kundal dena matlab life threat tha khud ke liye ..apni jeet ko dena matlab usse inhonne bhut chota krke bataya dusri baat inhone bola ki karna ne drona ko kaha ki brahman h ye toh derrpok h ...usse pahle batati h karna ki mata bhraman thi .. Matlab koi apni maa ke liye esa kyu bolega ? 3rd inhonne jis hisab se yudhishthir ko defend kiya kamaal h matlab inhonne ese dikhaya ki bechara yudhishthir kya kr skta tha juwa khelne ka mann itna kr gya ki bhai patni aur khud ko lga diya ..aur usse hum dharmaraj bol rhe h jisne sbse bda dharm kiya ...ye esa h jaisa apni patni ko bazaar me paiso me bech dena ...usko mai kbhi dharm raj nhi keh skta hun ..balki mai usse duryodhan jitna hi adharmi manta hun ...

@@vikas312yadav @vikas yadav कर्ण को कैसे याद करते हैं? दानवीर कर्ण...!! महादानी तो एक कर्ण था, कोई बराबरी कर सकता. कवच-कुंडल एक दिव्य उपहार जो कि जन्मतः कर्ण के देह से जुड़ा था. जानते बूझते कि याचक स्वयं इन्द्र देव हैं, उसने रत्ती भर समय नहीं लगाया और कवच कुंडल को शरीर से अलग कर इन्द्रदेव को दे दिया... अमी ने इस दान को कमतर आंका... मुझे ऐसा नहीं लगता!! कर्ण की माता के लिए जो कहा, उसे शायद आप समझ नहीं पाए... एमी ने आज के परिपेक्ष्य में कहा, क्योंकि ऐसी भ्रांतियां एक षड्यंत्र के तहत फैलाई गईं की कर्ण को एक रथी के परिवार में हुआ... ज़रा ध्यान से सुनिए, जो वर्ण व्यवस्था थी वह व्यक्ति के प्रोफेशन को लेकर बनाई गई थी... ना कि जन्म के द्वारा !! अगर ऐसा होता तो कर्ण को तो फिर रथ संचालन का स्पेशलिस्ट होना था... ? ये बातें कपटपूर्वक डाली गई, ताकि आप अपने पूर्वजों पर गर्व नहीं करें... विकास, ये जो स्वयम को लिब्रान्दू कहते हैं जिनसे बड़ा सनातन धर्म का नुकसान हुआ... अपने पूर्वजों पर गर्व करो... आज यही मैसेज हम सब हिंदुओं को समझना चाहिए!! समझदार लोग गलती नही निकालते, अपितु मेसेज क्या है, उसको समझकर उपयुक्त आचरण करने की अपेक्षा रसखि गई... आप यंग हो इसलिए जो कहा जा रहा है उसे सही context में समझना होगा... शुभकामनाएं

@@samitmathur007 sumit ji apne jo samjha aur jo kaha mai uska aadar krta hun ...aur mujhe pta karn kshetriya aur bhraman ka putra tha ..mujhe pta h usse samaj me aur logon se acha aadar mila hoga ..kyuki vo kisi aam sarthi ka putr nhi tha..usse samaj me auro ke barabar pr raja aur yuvraj se kam aadar mila hoga ..prantu ap mere baat samjh nhi rhe h ..ami ji jo explanation de rhi h usse hi contradict kr rhi h ..hame pta h karn ki mata bhraman thi, karn ka guru bhagwan parshuram bhraman the ...toh vo kisi aur bhraman ko darpok kese bol skta h ? Ami ji ki language esi thi explain krne me ki unhone bola ki yudhishthir je juaa khela ho gya excitement me vo samjh nhi paye ..lekin vo juaa khelna hi sbse bda adharam ..kyuki usme unhone khud ko , apne bhaiyon aur yha tak ki apni patni ko juee me lga diya .. Matlab isse bda adharm kuch nhi h ..toh mujhe lgta h duryodhan aur yudhishthir dono ne uss sabha me sbse bda adharm kiya tha. Aur jaisa apne btaya ki karn ne apne body ke part diye the daan me matlab ek hisab se khud ki zindagi de di daan me ... Isko ami ji ne ese bataya ki daan diya toh kya ? Inder se vapis sakti bhi toh le li thi .....unhone shi se explanation nhi kiya mahabharat ka ..main bhagwan krishna ka follower hu jo shi h vhi bolunga..... Mahabharat me har character me kuch na kuch achi quality bhi thi aur kahrab bhi .. krishna ji ko chhod kr kyuki vo beyond the limit h..

Jo lena hai lijiye.ye aapki soch par chhor diya gaya hai

Vikas shudra banke keh rahe ho toh Nishakhraj ko aur Maata Shabri ko yaad rakho Mahabharat mein Matsyagandha ko vi yaad rakhna barna chup rahna. Kuchh Janna nehi hein. Chuslam khalistani terroristani librandu jahil jihadi lefti ultra secular 72 hoora gang vrishchianism jaysa banna hein.

Good decision 👍

There are some wrong information in this debate regarding meat eating. There is no meat eating in Mahabharata and Ramayan. Do read sanskrit to hindi translation there is a word in Sanskrit called Maasam, that means fruits inside part....there is no mention of meat or fish at all. All these English translation done by Max Muller and his companions. There are 46 letters in Sanskrit and 26 letters in English. How can someone translate Sanskrit in English. Ye sab Kiya gya sirf hinduon ko badnaam krne ke liye 😡😡😡

Bow , 😂😂😂 ...... Isse acha hai ki admai gadhe se yaari karle .

It shows sri ram and pandavs did not discriminate....but caste discrimination 10,20,30,40,50etc years ago happen and continue to happen now too...

@@fakeking8860 Ravan was brahmin....also rakshas.

@@debtanupatra3385 yes that's what I said i agree about ramayan and mahabharat times....talk about present and recent past I.e few decades ago ...I'm interested in the dicrimation that is present now

@@fakeking8860 that is politics.

@@debtanupatra3385 that is the reality not just politics...but may be I am wrong to bring it in this context...thus is about distant history

There are some wrong information in this debate regarding meat eating. There is no meat eating in Mahabharata and Ramayan. Do read sanskrit to hindi translation there is a word in Sanskrit called Maasam, that means fruits inside part....there is no mention of meat or fish at all. All these English translation done by Max Muller and his companions. There are 46 letters in Sanskrit and 26 letters in English. How can someone translate Sanskrit in English. Ye sab Kiya gya sirf hinduon ko badnaam krne ke liye 😡😡😡

@@abhimannukumarsingh8068 Do you mean no Hindu should ever eat maans (meat) or that there is no rule about what you can eat?

Abe lawre Hinduism is not a vegan religion.. Shakta traditions offer fish and meat to goddess and Bali is important part of the rituals ... Take your North Indian sensibility up your ass ​@@abhimannukumarsingh8068

@ProDoge he was kutni putra.

@ProDoge Assuming it is true, that would say that he was technically proficient in fighting. It says nothing about him being a role model for dharma.

@ProDoge har baar bhag jaata karna arjun se bachke 40 to chodo .004 baar bhi nahi haraya

@ProDoge mb ka sabse bada fraud tha karna

@ProDoge koi logic nahi kuch bhi bolna hai.

Konse prashn

But that was the Best Mahabharat till date

There are some wrong information in this debate regarding meat eating. There is no meat eating in Mahabharata and Ramayan. Do read sanskrit to hindi translation there is a word in Sanskrit called Maasam, that means fruits inside part....there is no mention of meat or fish at all. All these English translation done by Max Muller and his companions. There are 46 letters in Sanskrit and 26 letters in English. How can someone translate Sanskrit in English. Ye sab Kiya gya sirf hinduon ko badnaam krne ke liye 😡😡😡

Sanskrit Bharathi, The Sanskrit Channel (Uday Shreyas), Govt Sanskrit College in your own state. Plus several books by Geeta Press Gorakhpur

There are some wrong information in this debate regarding meat eating. There is no meat eating in Mahabharata and Ramayan. Do read sanskrit to hindi translation there is a word in Sanskrit called Maasam, that means fruits inside part....there is no mention of meat or fish at all. All these English translation done by Max Muller and his companions. There are 46 letters in Sanskrit and 26 letters in English. How can someone translate Sanskrit in English. Ye sab Kiya gya sirf hinduon ko badnaam krne ke liye 😡😡😡

@@abhimannukumarsingh8068 It wasn't Max Muller working by himself, we have to accept that medieval Hindus, particularly Brahmins are major cause of downfall. Just to get coveted jobs in Islamist n subsequently British states it's the Hindu Brahmins that forced changed the concept of Varna to mean caste. These Islamist Brahmins also reduced women to nothing.

When you listen to this person and then start getting brainwashed. Go and actually read it, Karna is not as weak as these people are calling him!

@@suparna5177 Yeah, and who didn't!

@@suparna5177 arjun was a very strong warrior physically also during the fight with mahadev , he uprooted a tree to throw it towards mahadev and threw heavy stones also

@@taruntac4347 but karn was also not as shown in serials

​@@suparna5177arjuna can never be in physical fight ..archery he can for sure

Of course you can learn too! Do look up The Sanskrit Channel here on KZfaq. Other sources for learning is Sanskrit Bharathi, and govt Sanskrit Colleges in many states.

There are some wrong information in this debate regarding meat eating. There is no meat eating in Mahabharata and Ramayan. Do read sanskrit to hindi translation there is a word in Sanskrit called Maasam, that means fruits inside part....there is no mention of meat or fish at all. All these English translation done by Max Muller and his companions. There are 46 letters in Sanskrit and 26 letters in English. How can someone translate Sanskrit in English. Ye sab Kiya gya sirf hinduon ko badnaam krne ke liye 😡😡😡

@@abhimannukumarsingh8068 Very true Prabhu Ji

Mahabharat agar aaj khud se padhi hote toh yahan , bless ki jagah kuch aur likhte. How Fake she is , and distorted her Mahabharata is .

@@roganstone4979 you are literally replying to everyone's comment and writing the same thing over and over that this not real , why are you so much bothered which you think is a wrong information? stop this propaganda nonsense..