underrated comment

I can make a german accent and tell you a bunch of nonsense

Is this also the only video you have watched this year?

@@nahCmeR your comment is bad and you should feel bad

It's a normal title. Maybe you need to find better channels lol.

9Lives have you tried valorant?

@@OnlyMeBeingMe your comment is worse and you should feel worse

I am not surprised tbh. I like Apex, but server structure is not good. Laggy and unresponsive. To be fair, everything we got online these days is amazing. But some things more than others.

hyperscape is super dead

Apex is the best though.

EA sucks nothing new it'd be too expensive for them to justify the effort of even matching pubg which has 60 tic

Probably as bad as apex lol. 20hz server😂

Would love a tarkov one that game is a fuckin’ enigma

He did a video about tarkov like 1-2 years ago revealing such shit netcode that the devs wanted to copystrike his vid to take it down. It probably improved since then but its still shit

What, people are still playing Aimbotland/lag2death? Interesting...

Long story short: nothing changed since his original video for Tarkov. (TL;DR: Tarkov netcode is crap, borderline clientside authoritive and delay values are in their 200-500)

@@Dizintegrator This is absolutely false. Compared to his original EFT video, the netcode has been massively improved. It's still shit, but way way better.

fr

Lul

Or Respawn

Competitive game vs casual game. It isn't in their interest nor it's the goal of the game. Valorant is almost exclusively aimed towards competitive. Besides 128tick servers are costly to maintain.

@@hugopfeffer4175 And they literally make billions of dollars from this one title.

@@hugopfeffer4175 Shooting first, dying first, is COD. Which is why I don't play on those Chinese spyware servers

Yeah. We've gotten used to update / command rate being the tick-rate. Maybe because CS:GO matches those values to the server tick rate automatically. It was quite common back in CS 1.6 days for community servers to run at a tick/sim rate of 1000hz even though max update/cmd rates were capped at 100. I'm quite surprised valorant's update and cmd rates are not 128.

There are netduma routers that you can set to only connect you to low ping servers. Maybe that is the reason.

Sounds like the Warzone servers use different datacenters than the normal multiplayer modes. Hence your ping is much higher in Warzone, which runs on servers much further away. That is the only explanation I have for this. O.o

@@BattleNonSense warzone servers connect me n my frens in same squad to servers with different ping when we have the same ISP and country haha

@@BattleNonSense Could there be a routing issue that happens with Warzone servers to cause such high lag though? Gigabit Connection straight into an SB8200 doesn't improve it. I jump into Blackout and I'm greeted by a 40-50ms match instantly. Even those servers were kind of weird compared to their multiplayer servers.

My issue with Warzone is the packet loss, that I don't seem to get in any other game. According to the monitor in game I get losses of about 15%-20% very often and sometimes spikes of 70%-100%. Again, I don't have this in any other multiplayer game I play like EFT, Valorant, or Overwatch.

100% Hunt has the problem he mentioned after the 10min mark in his 101 video, their servers aren't completing the necessary calculations in the allotted time frame. Anecdotal evidence: Rubber-banding teleportation, being thrown into the air randomly. etc. I've literally been teleported into a building while walking alongside it before, right into that room on the West wing of Fort's North boss lair that has a window that can't be vaulted from outside North and a barricaded door South. Both were closed, unfortunately I didn't have my recording software enabled for that moment, was hilarious. Of course I make this statement as a nobody with no intimate experience in computer networking.

I tested Star Citizen ages ago - sadly since then the networking has hardly changed. They keep delaying the big updates.

+1

For developers? :-) If you are asking about players - how could they fix it!

Apex has insanely high TTK, it does not really need a good netcode

@@sk8erbyern it does instead, especially because of the netcode! It is so easy to get client side hits denied on the server side

@@MasterControl90original the point is that 1/2 lost shots matter less when it takes 8 instead of 3 shots

It says that the date of the test was on June 2019. I think it has probably improved a bit by now

@@mm-rw3hi it matters more instead, I seriously can't understand how you can say it!

Stable frame times feels smoother and easier to control your character

Not really.

@Way Better thats why I include the subtitles. 😉

@@parahodika I find him easy to understand. But I am German, so I am used to the accent.

@@BattleNonSenseI am non native english speaker and i find your accent very clear and easier to understand than a native english speaker. Thank you.

@@parahodika What? He speaks so well and clearly, I don't think it's BN that's the problem lol

He did, it is still there to some degree.

RiotStealthyJesus talked about this on reddit/r/VALORANT/comments/gavoyu/peekers_advantage_strafe_shooting/ I would love Chris to look about it and make some tests too.

this is an extreme issue in EU if you manage to hit FRENCH servers(90% of games for whaterever fucking reason) which is a big fucking pile of trash with massive peekers advantage up to 0.5 second delay usually results enemy appearing in front of you and dying the very next moment as like they prefired your spot deleted this fucking game until i will have ability to choose frankfurt and ban abysmal datacenters

Peekers advantage in Valorant is not a netcode issue, as the game has much higher refresh rates as others and minimal delay. It is mostly a game design issue now, with weapons allowed to fire accurately even when still moving, and model animations being wacky showing a continuous running animations.

@@PoRRasturvaT i could believe that i just know there is some kind of issue im a cs player with like 6k hours so i would like to think i have some idea of how it should feel and valorant just feels off i think the binding shit and shoot to the same button has a lot to do with it

it also makes you lag it's not really good I have it on because my internet is really limited but holy crap it makes things worse most of the times because sometimes you might fail jumps or stutter behind or land at the same place twice or something it's really bad but also I have to leave it on to maintain 160+ FPS or otherwise I have to decrease my FPS to less than 96 FPS so the stupid server doesn't take up my whole bandwidth

I had set it to medium thinking it would help lag spikes

wrong that only happens with phoenix ult

Additionally I tested the ingame frame time metric which increases when activating the ingame limiter (x2 for me), so this suggests no limit is better. Also the frame time remains quite stable with uncapped fps leading me to believe the frame time variance is acceptable, but all depends offcourse on how good/ accurate this metric is ingame.

Yes. But you FPS must be not only high but also STABLE

I played like 5 matches of apex, and noticed how COD'ish it felt. Shoot first, die first, hitmarkers never appear, or I get 27 with no damage, blah blah blah. Multiplayer games with bad servers belong in the trash in 2020.

In online multiplayer games, the agressive player usually has an advantage, especially when that player has low system and network latency. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/a7CRfcaHl5zGoHk.html That is why you want to get the ping of all players on the server as low and equal as possible. Which is where the AWS accelerator network comes into play.

​@@BattleNonSense Got it, thanks for the reply.