ATOMISWAVE

@@JEY74 To be honest most of the games for ATOMISWAVE seem to be low-medium budget... there are Dreamcast games from 1999 and 2000 that are better graphically

@@JEY74 Its not the same as what was released on the Dreamcast. Most of those Atomiswave games look worse than most of the games that came out in 1998. They were not trying to push the envelope of the system like the other consoles, just trying to make a quick buck.

exactly@@Marchand12

The cancelled port of Half-Life gave us a good idea of the uphill battle the Dreamcast would have faced.

Not really up to par at all but 1st party games were great graphically. Not enough RAM for something with huge level and draw distance like Ratchet and Clank. Maybe an upgra.... nm, lol.

Not enough main system memory and 1gb discs were a handicap also. They would've eventually had to design a proper dual analog stick pad as well...I loved the dc but once Microsoft formally entered the race it was all but dead

​@@eponymous7910Game Cube tinha praticamente a mesma capacidade de armazenamento de Mídia e durou até o fim, então só porque o Dreamcast usava GD não é desculpa, ele duraria tranquilamente a Sexta Geração...

​@@atinimaedigresylnão está mesmo não, o do Plastation 2, é bem mais inferior mesmo, isso com 2 anos de Software novo, larga de fanboyisse, o Dreamcast sempre foi graficamente melhor que o Plastation 2, quando o assunto era port para ambos dos mesmos jogos, e não confunda Arquitetura diferentes com capacidade de receber ou não ports...

If SEGA had simply released the Dreamcast as a "64X" $100 addon for the Saturn for Christmas of 1998, they wouldn't have lost EA, they wouldn't have burned so many buyers who'd just shelled out $400 for the Saturn, and they'd have a machine that could play the 1,000+ titles already developed for the Saturn. In fact, with the Saturn finally getting pushed to its graphical limits, it could've been used to draw backgrounds while the two SH4's and NEC PowerVR could've been used exclusively to draw the foreground layers, ultimately giving gamers much better graphical fidelity than the PS2. And developers could gradually ease in to the new, beefier hardware as they became comfortable with it. Not only that, but many PS1 games that were too difficult to port to Saturn would've ended up just using the Saturn and 64X addon. It's only because the $160 32X (and Sega CD) was arbitrarily killed off by SoJ in October 1995 that gamers and developers walked away from SEGA. The company had considered several different accelerator cards for the struggling console ranging in price from $35-60.

Does Redream have wheel support? 😮

@@IronicSonic83 Yes

Why not Flycast?

Sega mortally wounded the Dreamcast. Sony just delivered a mercy blow.

just skybox and colors vibrancy

Pero en Dreamcast se ve mejor aunque te arda el ojete.

You can , if ya find the modded version with cheats and burn it! I think it used to be on the emu paradise and not sure now!?

A vitória do Dreamcast era normal de se esperar, quando o assunto está relacionado a qualidade gráfica de um mesmo jogo, que saia para ele e o Plastation 2, pois mesmo o Plastation 2 tendo 32 mb de ram, sua memória de vídeo era apenas 4 mb, então ele tinha que pegar "emprestado" com a ram principal, enquanto o Dreamcast mesmo possuído 16 mb ram, sua memória de vídeo era de 8 mb, o dobro da memória de vídeo do Plastation 2, então não é de se admirar vitória a vitória do Dreamcast, frente a muitos portes, que sai, tanto para ele e o Plastation 2, a não ser que o devs, fizesse um port preguiçoso, sem querer usar os Kit de desenvolvimento reais do Dreamcast...

na verdade o GT4 não roda em HD o jogo continua sendo processado em 480p e somente o sinal é em 1080i... tanto q o resultado final o jogo é mais bonito em 480p que quando exebido em 1080i via upscaling. Se vc tiver um PS2 destravado vc pode forçar quase qualquer jogo a rodar em 1080i com o software GSM.

De onde você tirou isso ? GT 4 rodando em HD ? No máximo um upscaling, o primeiro GT a ter modo online que seria o 4, foi prometido, e até hoje nada, estamos esperando o GT 4 com modo online.

@@pires7spc o Marketing da Sony na época dava a entender q rodava em 1080i nativo... coisa q não é verdade. Mas tem gente q ainda acha q é verdade

@@megaigor Verdade, fãs cegos da Sony.

@@megaigor O marketing na Sony era tão forte, que muitos achavam que o Playstation 2 era mais potente até que o Xbox clássico.

Ps2 did a lot of cool tricks in software though and could chuck particles around without any performance hit. You couldn't run something like Burnout 2 or 3 with sparks, heat haze and real time deformation on a DC at anything close to 60fps

@@eponymous7910 The PS2 is better in Software. but Hardware wise, the PS2 lacked a lot of graphical features than what the Dreamcast had. resulting many PS2 games looking worse than the Dreamcast, with worse textures, worse anti-aliasing, & lower resolution.

@@Mr.Atari2600 And for whatever reason, noticeably less vibrant colours.

There were only about a handful of games on DC that used SSAA, and only on the horizontal axis. So that is not much of an advantage... almost never. DC's texture compression is a very nice and advanced feature for it's time. But it was not lossless, it cost a bit of details and colors. And depending on the geometric complexity of the scenes, you had about 3 to 4 MB of memory left for textures in VRAM if you also consider the 1.2 MB of memory for the two framebuffers. VQ-texture compression ratio depends on texture size, you end up at about 5:1 compression on average, that means about 15 to 20 MB for textures on DC on average. Now, on the PS2, you get 32MB of RD-RAM (plus about 2 MB for textures on the cache at the GS) where you would store your textures. So, again depending on how much other data is held in (V)RAM, the end result is quite comparable to the DC and certainly not as bad as the 8 MB vs 4 MB would seem. Resolution... a lot of PS2-games used the full height 480 framebuffer and many games were able to output 480p. Don't just look at the launch games. Tile rendering is a very nice feature of the PowerVR chip indeed, it certainly helps to reduce bandwith for z-buffering (which the DC needs since it did not have very fast memory bandwith).

​@@MH-yp6wg aver programate un juego y te creería un poquito. mucha información errónea y rebuscada.

0:06

Tem o arcade até hoje em São Paulo. Vai no Lord's no Tatuapé, vc vai ver essa belezura ao vivo. Isso é simulador, não é arcade. É bem dificil.

Not at all.. this is a pretty hardcore sim, despite its looks!

yeah right, each has advantage over other in some parts

Dreamcast nao teve atualizações nos kits de desenvolvimento e software, mas levando em consideração o hardware dele rodaria sim adapatado pra ele o desafio real era o gd rom com 2gb em comparativo ao dvd o maior trunfo do ps2 e o dvd muito mais espaço q a concorrência

Es un hack lo dice en el video

designed for naomi, dc is port

As well as Ecco and Code Veronica.

The PS2 is easy to underestimate. But even Konami struggled to get their AAA ports running on Xbox without compromises. It's not until the next generation of hardware and standardized engines that you begin to see anything even approaching genuine equality in the most advanced multiplatform games.

Must look exponentially better than the upcoming Forza then.

i know, but it suits the vibe