I am just so Blessed to have a Latin Parish available to me. We are open full time. Reconciliation twice a day. Full Mass schedule. More Daily Masses are available Mon. Thru Sat Than all of the other Perishes. Just no contest. The Latin Mass is so Beautiful and much more Reverent. The closest place to Heaven on Earth.

all concerned and unconcerned Catholics should take the time to watch these videos, thumbs up!!!

Thank you for your elegant explanation of the sad state of our church. Lord have mercy Precious blood of Jesus wash over us

JESUS CHRIST WILL RESTORE HIS CHURCH IN DUE TIME.. MORE PATIENCE IS NEEDED.. AND PATIENCE IS POWER THAT THE MODERNIST DON'T HAVE.

Thank you for helping lay Catholics understand the manipulation of Vatican II. Bless you!

God bless you Mr. Guimarães and the Tradition in Action team! Looking forward to the next video! Greetings from México.

What an absolutely beautiful and informative video! Great and holy man. God bless you for sharing your wisdom. May our Lady of the Miracle and her heavenly angels, multiply the fruit of your work.

Remember: Pray for our Holy Father, that he will understand his wicked ways and do whatever is necessary to win this war against the Devil and his agents.

Outro orgulho é saber que és meu conterrâneo, e não havia ouvido falar de vosso trabalho, conheci algumas obras de Gustavo Corção mas temos outro carioca de alta cultura e elevado intelecto tratando das obras de Deus. Paz em Cristo!

My dear TIA -- Paula told me about this video, and we watched it together: she at her home and I at mine. Beautiful! Magnificently done by all, and it was a joy to be 'connected' to you all through this surprise video. Of course, the scenes of NO were too painful for me to watch, so I turned away until they went bye-bye. I could not afford to buy any more books, so that's why I'm short of volumes - but know my prayers are always with you, and I thank God for allowing me to know you personally, even though the time was too short. Love to all, jje

May I add my sincere thanks for putting these videos up. All we need to do is spread the word about this channel. I just came upon it while looking for something else. God bless you all.

Informative, systematic and well presented. Thank you!

This is a great collection, congratulations!!!!

LORD SAVE US FROM THIS PAPACY...AMEN!!!✝️📿✝️

Our one true living god almighty will rectify his own catholic truth in our beautiful church ⛪️ in his own glorious way 🙏

Thank you for this perfect video. From Italy, Cristo Regni!!

Thank you, I watched every episode of wcbohio priests when they were young, very interesting.Thank God for Marcel Lefyre. The Ottaviani Intervention. Etc Bella Todd. Thank you for your time and help.God bless you

Very timely n helpful

Sr. Atila. Salve Maria! Parabéns por mais esta iniciativa do TIA. Fica a sugestão de videos em português para os amigos do Brasil, creio que muitos brasileiros que não dominam o inglês seriam agraciados.

Can anyone advise which document was removed by Paul VI that made 17 become the 16 final document and where can I find it online?

Ave Maria, gratia plena, Dominus tecum. Benedicta tu in mulieribus, et benedictus fructus ventris tui, Iesus - "Qui Spiritum Sanctum misit" - Sancta Maria, Mater Dei, ora pro nobis peccatoribus nunc et in hora mortis nostrae. Amen.

Saudações do Brasil professor Atila, gostaria que disponibilizasse seus vídeos para o nosso idioma para que mais pessoas tenham acesso a esse conteúdo.

Thank you so much for sharing this information, may God bless you for the work you do for His holy church. Pope Francis surely is the head of the Conciliar church but I doubt he is the true pontiff of the true Catholic church.

Vatican 2 is Mystery Babylon

Given the substantial change that occurred in the church, implemented by Vatican II, I cannot understand what TIA has against sedevacantism.

The more I watch I see that “ The Church of Christ” replaces “ “The Catholic Church”. In its wording.

28:27 It must be said of Johann Adam Moehler that he provided a very competent Catholic criticism of Protestantism in his work Symbolik (Symbolism). I have to wonder at your identifying him with the V2 tendency. What work of his do you draw your conclusions of him from, and was he ever subject to any official criticism by the pre-V2 Church authorities?

this dude's name is atila? so cool! why didn't i name any of my kids that?

So if the Church is invisible, if membership in the Church depends on a person's interior state (such as love), then it is impossible to know who belongs to it. Indeed, if I were to claim that an individual was not Catholic, then I would be "judging" them, because how could I know what they were feeling inside?

greatest body of counter theology ever. only ABL has something similar or ABP Vigano

May Jesus Christ bless you! His church will prevail. The Holy Catholic Church is the TRUE church outside of which there is NO salvation !

You don't need a mass for Reconciliation

No, Ubi Primum of Pius IX never said what you quote at 12:52. I have checked the Latin, Italian and English version of Ubi primum

Vatican II - A normal council? Hermeneutic of continuity or hermeneutic of inversion? The mind of the early Church was specific although her formulated doctrine was less specific. For that reason the formulated doctrine needed to be constantly specified to better articulate WHAT WAS ALREADY BELIEVED. Whereas the post-conciliar trend is to modify the mind of the Church to conform to a more generically formulated doctrine. Did Vatican II leave out or ignore some essential Catholic Doctrine? A consideration of Vatican II using the concepts of genus and species. Without getting into the historical background, inner workings and doctrinal details of the Vatican II documents and rather relying on what most Catholics know about it, the following analogy I think is most revealing: Aristotle says that the natural way of learning and coming to know things is from the generic to the more specific. Just as when we see something moving in the distance we first identify it as a body and then as it moves closer an animal and even closer a man and finally as this particular person; Socrates. Now it needs to be understood that there is a difference between our knowledge of a thing and the thing itself. Furthermore if someone were to give the definition of the species of a thing instead of giving the definition of the genus of that thing one would give a more precise and fuller account of the thing. In other words, the more specific our knowledge becomes of something the closer our knowledge resembles the thing, the truer our knowledge is. (Truer, in the sense of having more truth. Adeguatio res et intellectus) This is the natural way man comes to know. To try to move in the opposite direction is unnatural and against human nature. To try to forget what one already KNOWS about something in order to know it more generically is an act of violence against oneself. It would entail force that goes against one's own nature. Using an analogy this would be like a seasoned cavalier who has known horses his whole life attempting to not consider a horse anymore as a horse but rather as an unspecified animal. Now what is more generic and less specific is more universal. Whereas as what is more specific is more exclusive, in the sense that an essential difference is added to the genus in order to define the species. This sets it apart from other species. In the same way when one says the word animal it can apply to many things. Whereas, when one says man it excludes many things and applies to just one type of animal. Now, things that exist in reality ARE NOT generic they are specific. The Church founded by Our Lord is a real existing reality. It is something specific with its own essential elements and properties. A specific account of the Church includes more essential elements than a generic one. The Councils, pronouncements and doctrines throughout the ages became more and more specific. The Church's awareness of itself approached more and more the reality of its own being. It is impossible to move in the other direction. In other words it is impossible to move from a specific knowledge to a more general confused knowledge. A generic knowledge of anything is always more confused than a specific one, just as knowing something only in so far as it is an animal is more confused than knowing it specifically. Instead, our knowledge specifies as we gain acquaintance and experience of a thing. One may object that the Apostles or early Christians had a very clear and specific knowledge of the Church. This is true. However the Church's formulated doctrine was not as specific. Throughout the centuries this doctrine became better formulated and more specific. This was necessary especially to rule out heresy and error. A more generic knowledge on the other hand leaves out essential elements since it can never define as well and as close to reality as a specific account can. Take for instance the treasure of Dogmas the Church has and considering for instance the doctrine of Transubstantiation or the Immaculate Conception. These are very well defined truths of our faith. To try and forget about them and return to a more generic explanation would, at this point in time, leave out essential elements. One may ask, why say "at this point in time" would entail leaving out essential elements? Its necessary to say "at this point in time" since one could object and say that the early Church's catechising was not as formulated as it was post Council of Trent, yet we cannot say that the Church left out essential elements in its teaching at that time. This is true and that is the point. When heresies attacked the faith of the Church, as what happened with Luther's idea of the Real Presence during mass, the older formulation of what happens during the consecration was no longer specific enough. Therefore the Church better and more specifically defined this miracle using the concept of transubstantiation. Any teaching now on the Real Presence which left out the concept of transubstantiation would at this point in time leave out what has become essential elements. Unless we would pretend that the threat of heretical interpretations no longer persists and a generic account would immediately render a correct understanding. However we know this is not the case. Now, in order for Vatican II to be less divisive, open to non Catholics and ALSO IN ORDER FOR THERE TO BE CONSENSUS AMONGST THE COUNCIL FATHERS, THE COUNCIL HAD TO REVERSE THE NATURAL PROCEDURE AND PROCLAIM SOMETHING MORE GENERIC THAN PREVIOUS COUNCILS. Now, one could argue that the council taught no error. Entering into this debate is not easy and not for the most of us. However knowing that the council purposefully decided to be less specific and more generic is known by all of us. Can we say that a generic knowledge of a thing is deficient compared to a fuller specific knowledge of a thing? Trying to go against oneself and forget what one once knew or defined creates the impression that one must have been wrong once upon a time. Because why else would one try to forget or forget to mention what one once knew or defined? How many people do we know who have used Vatican II to look back and interpret older Councils? Anything more specific than the Council is frowned upon as superfluous and outdated. But does truth age? Never the less can we blame them for acquiring this habit when this is a natural consequence of artificially regressing and not progressing in knowledge? Of trying to be less specific and more generic? Furthermore, there is a prevalent assumption amongst "post conciliar" Catholics that Vatican II attempted to strip Catholicism of whatever is non essential. But, this leads to a contradiction since to hold this view would be to believe that a specific account is less essential than a generic account. This is the same as saying that the definition of man as rational animal is less essential than defining him as an animal. I would therefore like to ask: Why do we think Vatican II is supposed to be a type of update of Catholicism or a type of refocusing of the Church on what is really essential? Did the Council Fathers intentionally want to be less specific for the sake of truth or was this a consequence of trying to find consensus both internally and with the outside world? Was the Church's self awareness and identity diminished on account of this? Following the proverb Lex orandi lex credendi and its just as true corollary lex credendi lex orandi is it fair to say that an analogy can be drawn: as the new council (specific to generic) compares to the organic evolution of doctrine (generic to specific) so does the new mass compare to the organic evolution of the ancient mass? This leads to the next question: in trying to reverse the natural progression from generic to specific and trying to return to the more generic with the excuse of returning to the mode of expression of the early Church does the real danger exists of actually becoming more generic than the early Church itself? There is an essential difference here: the mind of the early Church was very specific although her formulated doctrine was less specific. For that reason the formulated doctrine needed to be constantly specified to better articulate WHAT WAS ALREADY BELIEVED. Whereas the post-conciliar trend is to modify the mind of the Church to conform to a more generically formulated doctrine.

'Political correctness', be it deeply bad-intentioned or just unintelligently naïve, has been the potential doom of Catholicism as we know it. There's a LOT to be done, possibly we won't have time. Miserere nobis, Domine Iesu.

why do bishops and cardinals and benedict xvi always look so sinister?

And one has to differentiate between individual statements by popes, such as some of the quotes in this video, and the statements made exCathedra- meaning the pope in union with the bishops of the Church speaking about matters of faith and morals.

Traditional vs Modern

With all those Bishops together at Vatican 2, the consecration of Russia should have been done.

So true, Jesus our Redeemer, Lord and Savior, warned us about the wolves dressed in shepherds clothes. Saint Paul advised the church to test the fruits to discern its fruits. Us the church militants must stay secured in the Holy Traditions, Practices, Dogmas, Beliefs based on what Jesus Himself instituted and built His Bride the Catholic Church. No clergy, no theologian or entity can change the principles of the Catholic Church as the Only means of salvation. Vatican II gave birth to the Masons infiltrators to come out of their dungeon and to the main altar of the Seat of Saint Peter. Since Vatican II, the fruits of the masons and their instruments are evil and corrupt. It is our obligation as the church militant to preserve and persevere in these times of trial of our Holy Mother the Church. Jesus words will never pass, His words are living streams of water, which will never cease, no matter who or what tries to stop the flow of the Living Water.

Jp2 had two faces.

At the same time, the very Scriptures of the Bible are interpreted differently, as hey too can be ambiguous. Thus we must listen to the teachings of the Church, not the teachings of the Internet.

As you said, you are no Theologian. If you are going to present a particular point of view, please present your case supported by evidence of wider reading on the subject which will then enable you to support your point of view with sound logical arguments. There was very little reference to the scriptures, and no reference to the writings of the Church Fathers and great Theologians of the early church. The Documents of Vatican 11 are very much scripture based. I am also wondering if you have heard about the MERCIFUL God.

Urgency is needed…

Devastating. Horrible. I got an anti formation. Except for1st Grade Sister. Then darkness

true restoration website has a video vatican ii what the heck are you/ has lyrics you may agree with/ also mary ball martinez undermining the catholic church takes humanist modernism back to freemason cardinal rampolla/ father luigi villa chiesa viva supports her claims both very underestimated authors and unknown TO THE DEVIL DELIGHT

Feces and Vaseline is all you have to know about V2!

Cutting and pasting comments GET A LIFE

According to Vatican II we have to praise and even worship Pachamama as Pope and monks/nuns did at Vatican Gardens in October 2019 but it is an ABOMINATION according to the Bible.

The Vatican 2 is from the 👿👿👿👿👿👿

The BIBLE itself is interpreted in different ways too. So how can you complain about the Vatican II documents?

This is not true. It was already believed before Vatican II that non-Catholics could be saved. Pius IX himself told in Singulari Quidem: "Outside of the Church, nobody can hope for life or salvation unless he is excused through ignorance beyond his control". And in Quanto Conficiamur Moerore, he said: "There are, of course, those who are struggling with invincible ignorance about our most holy religion. Sincerely observing the natural law and its precepts inscribed by God on all hearts and ready to obey God, they live honest lives and are able to attain eternal life by the efficacious virtue of divine light and grace. Because God knows, searches and clearly understands the minds, hearts, thoughts, and nature of all, his supreme kindness and clemency do not permit anyone at all who is not guilty of deliberate sin to suffer eternal punishments."

Error's are contained in your evaluation: Vatican 11 LG on Eccuminsm has to do with Baptised Christians of other denominations. It does not refer to non Christians. These come under the heading of the Declaration of non Christian religions. Other Christians by virtue of Baptism possess the Holy Spirit. However these gifts of the holy Spirit rightfully belong to the Catholic Church. However, because they have separated themselves they do not possess the fullness of the faith. The Holy Spirit will not be pinned down, He goes where He wills. Example in both Testaments in the OT Eldad and Medad the two outside the camp received the Holy Spirit. In the NT Jesus defended those who where not disciples outsiders who performed miracles in his name saying, "Do not stop them for anyone who does a miracle in my name cannot speak evil of me". To deny that the Holy Spirit operates in other Baptised Christian's is wrong. They cannot be lumped together with non Christians. This is where you err and go wrong.