Vincent Bugliosi on OJ Simpson Pt.2 (1995)

  Рет қаралды 89,882

Squirt37

Squirt37

17 жыл бұрын

Vincent Bugliosi on Geraldo Rivera's Show a few days after the OJ Simpson verdict.

Пікірлер: 295
@michaelwalker2676
@michaelwalker2676 5 жыл бұрын
'Outrage' was a brilliant, convincing book about the OJ Simpson trial. All of Vincent's criticism of the prosecution lawyers, the judge, and the defense tactics is valid and true.
@markross2124
@markross2124 Жыл бұрын
I read it also and agree with basically what he stated that it was the total incompetence of the prosecution. Also, he lost a lawsuit and as far as I know he never has had to pay one cent to the Goldman family.
@ryancalhoun2910
@ryancalhoun2910 4 ай бұрын
@@markross2124He paid a little bit to the Goldmans. However, and I surely don't mean to suggest Simpson was innocent, but losing a civil case is not evidence that he committed the murders.
@samsca8529
@samsca8529 3 ай бұрын
@@markross2124He has paid them but it’s far lower than they were ordered to have paid to them.
@MrDuds1984
@MrDuds1984 2 ай бұрын
Clark did not call Jill Shively who saw Simpson leave the seen and ID’ed his license plate number, Vincent missed that one as well.
@MoneyOverFame
@MoneyOverFame 8 жыл бұрын
I would've loved to watch Bugliosi prosecute OJ at trial, and go up against OJ's legal team. Bugliosi makes a brilliant and powerful argument against OJ in regards to this case ! Too bad he wasn't able to prosecute. R.I.P Vince.
@MoneyOverFame
@MoneyOverFame 8 жыл бұрын
+Bman Chu I agree ! Vince was a brilliant guy.
@markanderson77
@markanderson77 4 жыл бұрын
It wouldn't have been a different result, because there were no murder victims, and the trial was a huge screenplay. It was a drama. A hoax.
@vincentlem2534
@vincentlem2534 4 жыл бұрын
I totally agree. Vince would have won and got a guilty verdict.
@lavarball8423
@lavarball8423 4 жыл бұрын
Bman Chu Well. OJ isnt a lawyer....
@BOBBYSOX86
@BOBBYSOX86 Жыл бұрын
@@markanderson77 really? Facts to back up your claim?
@saramonson990
@saramonson990 3 жыл бұрын
I read his book Helter Skelter as a very young teen. He's the best prosecutor and a genuine seeker of justice for victims. RIP sir.
@Berkmugga
@Berkmugga Жыл бұрын
He’s amoron. This guy is rotting in hell for all the innocent people he put in jail.
@whataboutrob442
@whataboutrob442 Жыл бұрын
@@Berkmugga Who was innocent that he put in prison?
@alvindlee1
@alvindlee1 Жыл бұрын
Homer Simpson could have prosecuted Charles Manson
@jvarela965
@jvarela965 7 жыл бұрын
RIP Vincent Bugliosi greatest prosecutor in LA history
@ryancalhoun2910
@ryancalhoun2910 3 ай бұрын
And a great defense lawyer
@Jim_Harwood
@Jim_Harwood 2 ай бұрын
Yeah sure. Vince believes a guy slashed two adults to pieces on his way to LAX airport. Yeah open and shut case 🤣
@gspendlove
@gspendlove 13 жыл бұрын
Bugliosi's "Outrage" isn't just the best book on the Simpson case ever written, it just may be the best book ever written, period. If you read it and aren't convinced, then you probably believe in vampires, werewolves, demons, the Loch Ness Monster, Bigfoot, and other nonsense.
@dyates6380
@dyates6380 6 жыл бұрын
I agree. Loved it.
@nattyps3160
@nattyps3160 Жыл бұрын
Amazing plus his video 100% guilty convinced me beyond all doubt. A big problem for anyone was the trial should have been in Santa Monica once that mistake was made it was over. Clark Said every expert told her that at best w that jury after Rodney king was a hung jury.
@TVstudio
@TVstudio 17 жыл бұрын
I want to read OJ's book. "If I did It" I can't wait to find out how he really did it.
@gspendlove
@gspendlove 11 жыл бұрын
Ah, you wisely left out the first part of my sentence, which was "SINCE SIMPSON WAS GUILTY, AND COCHRAN HAD TO KNOW IT." The reason that was the only thing he could do was because he had nothing else. No other suspects, no alibi, nothing but his bogus charge of a racist police conspiracy to frame his client, which, of course, was complete bullshit. If your blood is found at the murder scene, you're guilty. Simpson was and is guilty of those two murders, and the jury's verdict changes nothing.
@BurtonRdForever
@BurtonRdForever 5 жыл бұрын
You know if Vincent Bugliosi was prosecuting this case that OJ Simpson would be cooling his heels in San Quentin. Marcia Clark has the brass neck to appear on chat shows like some celebrity when her claim to fame is letting someone walk after committing a double murder with enough evidence to convict 10!? Vincent Bugliosi is Premier League whereas Clark is fighting relegation in division 3.
@pommiebears
@pommiebears 4 жыл бұрын
Burton Rd Forever 1977 she didn’t let him walk. She made mistakes, as does any trial lawyer. Nothing was going to convince that jury to vote fairly. They thought they had a point to prove....so, they voted not guilty.
@joeb267382
@joeb267382 4 жыл бұрын
@@pommiebears Pommie bears you are absolutely right. There was NOTHING any prosecutor could have done differently to make that jury actually listen to the evidence and convict Simpson.
@pommiebears
@pommiebears 4 жыл бұрын
joeb267382 exactly, Happy New Year! 🥳 x
@apebitmusic83
@apebitmusic83 2 ай бұрын
@@joeb267382couldn’t disagree more. Prosecution made many many mistakes that could have been avoided. And that’s not hindsight. If Bugliosi had tried the case I have no doubt OJ would have been found guilty.
@AmusedChild
@AmusedChild 15 жыл бұрын
If only Vince could have presented the prosecution's case against O.J. Simpson.
@MarceloRomero360
@MarceloRomero360 Жыл бұрын
Exactly!
@Indul1
@Indul1 14 жыл бұрын
Sorry Simpson killed his wife and Goldman, the evidence is powerful and compelling...............Simpson had never met Goldman in his life but his blood was found in Simpson's car....end of story
@daviddavis3389
@daviddavis3389 Жыл бұрын
It's possible that Ron and Nic took OJs ride and went for a short excursion around L.A.??
@apebitmusic83
@apebitmusic83 2 ай бұрын
@@daviddavis3389 are you for real? You actually believe that could be the truth?
@cm9859
@cm9859 Жыл бұрын
Vincent Bugliosi was brilliant! If he would have prosecuted OJ in criminal court, he would have gone to prison. I agree 100 percent with Vincent. He was so articulate and quickly pointed out his view points. Rest in peace. I want to get book "Outraged".
@TheRickster.
@TheRickster. 4 күн бұрын
No, the race card was against any prosecutors at that trial.
@fabricatedreality8218
@fabricatedreality8218 8 жыл бұрын
I love Vince Bugliosi...
@randers78
@randers78 17 жыл бұрын
Bugliosi's book "Outrage" is really good, if you are interested . . .
@enormerschwanz
@enormerschwanz 6 жыл бұрын
+Ed Kahler Why not?
@Solitude47152
@Solitude47152 3 ай бұрын
Vince likes to write ✍️ books and criticize others. That’s what he is good at. You don’t see him trying the case.
@gspendlove
@gspendlove 11 жыл бұрын
And anyone who has read "Outrage" knows that with a competent (let alone brilliant, like Bugliosi) prosecutor, Cochran would have been soundly whipped. Since Simpson was guilty, and Cochran had to know it, the only thing he could do was nitpick and try to poke holes in the prosecution's case. And since Bugliosi would have presented far more incriminating evidence to the jury (the suicide note, Simpson's incriminating statement to police, etc.) he would have wiped the floor with Cochran.
@johndeagle4389
@johndeagle4389 7 жыл бұрын
Mental Poverty. The Jury.
@michaelwalker2676
@michaelwalker2676 5 жыл бұрын
The defense did not even introduce the Ford Bronco chase as incriminating evidence. Nor did they introduce the interview of Simpson by Detectives Lange and Vannatter. It impressed me that Bugliosi wrote that he could have proven Simpson guilty on that one interview. Before I read his analysis, I could not have worked that out from the interview transcript.
@obo7707
@obo7707 6 ай бұрын
Dont hold back , Mr. Bugliosi , tell us how you really feel!! Boy , what a great mad dog he would have been if he was in charge!
@Tsnore
@Tsnore 11 жыл бұрын
Considering the preponderance of evidence it is justifiable outrage I would say.
@fabricatedreality8218
@fabricatedreality8218 2 ай бұрын
Bugliosi would have wiped the floor with the “dream team”
@markanderson77
@markanderson77 4 жыл бұрын
Another point about the cut finger. Simpson claimed he had cut it by breaking a glass at the hotel room in Chicago. There is a serious problem with that explanation, as that backs up the time of the cut to after the blood is found. So he tries to explain his blood everywhere by saying he cut himself AFTER the blood was all over the place. And then you find his blood at Nicole's condo, which had to have been BEFORE he went to Chicago, and yet he wants pretend he hadn't even been to her condo anytime in the last several days.
@markmac2206
@markmac2206 3 жыл бұрын
in his recorded interview BEFORE they had his blood sample he admits he dripped the blood at his house. his lawyers ended up claiming that was planted by Vannatter. not playing the recording in court might not have changed the biased jury's verdict but it was a huge mistake.
@jacktorse28
@jacktorse28 13 жыл бұрын
i've never agreed with his jfk take but I absolutely have always loved listening to this guy talk.
@MyTony40
@MyTony40 2 жыл бұрын
I agree .. but he nails it with the OJ case .
@Sumbolon3301
@Sumbolon3301 Жыл бұрын
Did you even read it? I doubt it
@jacktorse28
@jacktorse28 Жыл бұрын
@@Sumbolon3301 I did, all the footnotes too.
@Sumbolon3301
@Sumbolon3301 Жыл бұрын
Ok, with a conclusion in RH you disagree?
@7beers
@7beers 14 жыл бұрын
Geraldo should not have interrupted him at all. Bugliosi is speaking beautifully, saying what needed to be said. Just let him go, man.
@jlorde8838
@jlorde8838 Жыл бұрын
Because he doesn't want the truth spoken.
@lisafoos3948
@lisafoos3948 9 жыл бұрын
Geraldo needs to learn to be quiet and listen.
@phizap
@phizap 9 жыл бұрын
Lisa Foos youve intrigued me to watch this lol ahhh geraldo,,,,i read his bio years ago,,,,,,,,,i told the librarian, "i didnt find his book so amazingly controversial" she says....thats why its on the "books for sale, 25 cents each ! table lol
@phizap
@phizap 9 жыл бұрын
Lisa Foos plus...i seen a clip of defending casey anthony !!! omg !
@lisafoos3948
@lisafoos3948 9 жыл бұрын
lin reynolds No way! Is he out of his mind?
@Mike-01234
@Mike-01234 5 жыл бұрын
Love to see him in action against OJ "Dream team" or any prosecution he retired before cameras were allowed in court rooms.
@gspendlove
@gspendlove 11 жыл бұрын
As you should know, "not guilty" does not mean "innocent." It only means the jury felt the prosecution hadn't met its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt (because Clark and Darden's performance was incompetent. "Monday morning quarterbacking?" Afraid not. Bugliosi brought up every point he makes here about the prosecution's poor performance in interviews DURING THE TRIAL, not after. He knew the prosecution was making grievous errors while the trial was going on, not after it was over.
@TDKiller415
@TDKiller415 2 жыл бұрын
He sent Marcia Clark some advice on what to cover in her closing argument but apparently she ignored it.
@15Hamster
@15Hamster 15 жыл бұрын
Amazing how OJ got off with it.. only in America. Vincent is exactly right!
@TDKiller415
@TDKiller415 2 жыл бұрын
The UK is going the same way. The Sun called Johnny Depp a wife-beater based only on allegations by Amber Heard, he had not been tried and convicted of any kind of domestic abuse at all. What the Sun did was libel/slander. Depp took them to court, but because the justice system is now compromised by issues of sexual orientation and gender (Amber Heard is a bisexual woman), he lost the case and lost his roles as Jack Sparrow and Gellert Grindelwald. In all irony, Heard has a record of physically abusing her previous lesbian partner, but her sexuality and reproductive organs won her the case here in the UK. Travesty of justice.
@MrFrankBullitt
@MrFrankBullitt 16 жыл бұрын
This makes me want to go to law school.
@fromaggiovagiola9128
@fromaggiovagiola9128 3 жыл бұрын
You know Darden is now a 'Law Professor'.
@Mr_Bones.
@Mr_Bones. 2 жыл бұрын
@@fromaggiovagiola9128 🤮
@Tita-gh3fl
@Tita-gh3fl 2 ай бұрын
Very interesting person allows one to study law in a more detailed and comprehensive study. Which some states or provinces Deny Deny deny
@anthonystick
@anthonystick 17 жыл бұрын
O.J SIMPSON IS GUILTY AS HELL!!!!!!!
@fabricatedreality8218
@fabricatedreality8218 6 жыл бұрын
R.I.P. Vincent Bugliosi
@gspendlove
@gspendlove 11 жыл бұрын
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
@chrissellers3516
@chrissellers3516 7 жыл бұрын
The jury taking only 3 hours to come up with a verdict just shows that they didn't even care to pay attention to all of the evidence, It should've taken at least a week to come up with a verdict to a high profile trial like this one that lasted almost a year.
@Jim.Jim.32
@Jim.Jim.32 5 жыл бұрын
the jurors probably understood the DNA evidence far better than many of the people (like you) who have condemned them. For example the bloody sock was examined three times and each time no blood was found. Then, weeks later, they find blood on the sock. The prosecution argued the blood couldn't be seen due to the dark color of the sock. But when the defense allowed the jurors to examine the sock in the courtroom (even under poor lighting conditions), they could clearly and easily see a blood stain. A BOMBSHELL in the case.
@scottclark8856
@scottclark8856 5 жыл бұрын
@@Jim.Jim.32 ok so this hardly the bombshell you talk about. The dna testimony put many of watchers to sleep 5 mins in, and as a jury forced to watch it all unfold in its entirety must have been mind-numbingly painful. I bet they couldnt wait for thst part of the trial to end. A pair of black socks laying on the floor in his bedroom didnt, unfortunately for the prosecution didnt get the attention it deserved. Had they been socks of another color of course things would have been different. It was a lame attempt by the prosecution to attempt to explain why they missed it in the first place. However, it was stored in evidence the entire time and again, unless there's a conspiracy it offers a legitimate explanation for how the story unfolded. I also found it interesting that when the detective called OJ at the hotel to tell him his wife was killed, OJ went on and on grief stricken but only once, at the very beginning of the conversation did he ask how. He wailed on the phone shes dead numerous times, he cried shes been killed a dozen or so times but only once at the beginning did he ask how. Just the one time. I find that strange. Here he is a broken man, inconsolable with grief yet he asks just once.... how? I dont know about you but thats extremely telling.
@Jim.Jim.32
@Jim.Jim.32 5 жыл бұрын
The sock was the most egregious plant in the entire case. In addition to the sock stain (which was examined 3 times by 2 labs and they all found no stain), a video of Ojs bedroom was taken the day after the murders which showed no sock on the floor. 30 minutes later when the criminologist came in and took another video of OJs bedroom, we now see the sock on the floor that wasnt there before. During that 30 minutes, Mark Furhman was in OJ's bedroom in that video. Whats more, the sock blood contained EDTA in such high concentrations to kill. The sock also had a wet transfer on the opposite side, meaning that if Oj was wearing them during the murders, the sock blood couldn't travel through his ankle. Ask yourself WHY would OJ leave a bloody sock in the middle of his bedroom floor if he was so careful to hide the clothing, shoes and murder weapon? Further, WHY would OJ be wearing $400 dress shoes and dress socks to begin with, when we know he was wearing Reeboks eating burgers with Kato just 45 minutes before the murders?
@scottclark8856
@scottclark8856 5 жыл бұрын
@@Jim.Jim.32 ojs blood was not taken until 6 hours following the detective telling oj your blood is at the murder scene, in the bronco, up the driveway and in your house. How do you explain this oj? I dont know. How did u cut yourself oj? I dont know. But yet arguments from your camp state witnesses were looking at oj on the plane, his rings, autograph sessions and no one reported anything unusual - but heres oj himself admitting when he couldnt explain away the blood how he must have cut himself at home before he ever left for Chicago. Btw, socks wet with blood when taken off will transfer blood. And please stop reporting the case facts out of sequence to bolster your theory.
@scottclark8856
@scottclark8856 5 жыл бұрын
@@Jim.Jim.32 and as you say be logical.... if oj was planning the murder wouldnt he want an alibi, wouldnt he indeed change his clothes and the italian loafers he was wearing were his everyday shoes. Expensive to u or I but his normal day to day shoes.
@Tsnore
@Tsnore 14 жыл бұрын
Did Geraldo Riviera ever find anything in Al Capone's vault?
@MarceloRomero360
@MarceloRomero360 Жыл бұрын
Nope.
@randyharris3175
@randyharris3175 2 ай бұрын
The jury let him go.
@kailashpatel1706
@kailashpatel1706 4 жыл бұрын
American people should proud that this man was a great citizen of theirs...An idiot would understand Simpson was guilty..
@jerrymarbury9365
@jerrymarbury9365 6 жыл бұрын
Oj walks because a bunch of racists let them off
@johndeagle4389
@johndeagle4389 7 жыл бұрын
Judge Ito was a disgrace
@fabricatedreality8218
@fabricatedreality8218 4 жыл бұрын
Yes he was.
@stephenouma
@stephenouma 3 жыл бұрын
Furhman was the culprit, Clark was stupid, Darden was an idiot for asking OJ to try on the gloves.
@daviddavis3389
@daviddavis3389 Жыл бұрын
@@stephenouma Ito was brilliant.
@Tom-lv2mv
@Tom-lv2mv Ай бұрын
@@stephenouma prosecution did a fine job,it was the jury that was stupid
@stephenouma
@stephenouma Ай бұрын
@@Tom-lv2mv Marcia Clark was terrible. F- for sure.
@rkeppler3633
@rkeppler3633 16 жыл бұрын
If you like Harry Potter, you'll love the Warren Commission Report. It's got everything; rubies, magic bullets, and the prince of camelot!
@sosueme66
@sosueme66 12 жыл бұрын
VB- so smart!
@hus390
@hus390 2 жыл бұрын
Blaming judge Ito for what?? Fuhrman didn't just used the "n" word. He confessed to having a bias against black men dating/married to white women. And the fact that he been to the property before in the domestic abuse case in 1989. You can try to convince the jury that race and OJ wasn't part of Fuhrman mindset but Judge Ito would have committed a reversible error if he didn't allowed Fuhrman to be questioned on his racial beliefs. ⚠️If OJ did it, he owes his freedom to Mark Fuhrman.
@Iiheosnjabskidbxbd
@Iiheosnjabskidbxbd 6 жыл бұрын
See, CNBC just does not wanna others say evidence and truth !
@gspendlove
@gspendlove 11 жыл бұрын
I'm afraid you're very much wrong. Vincent Bugliosi was an active defense attorney at the time of the Simpson trial. He had not been a prosecutor for years, it is true, but he remained informed and up-to-date about any changes in the criminal law. And then there's his record: 105 convictions out of 106 felony jury trials, and 21 murder convictions without a single loss. Cochran? Never won a murder case before he represented Simpson, and was primarily a civil, not a criminal, attorney. (cont.)
@NkrumahTure
@NkrumahTure 11 жыл бұрын
"...the only thing he could do was nitpick and try to poke holes in the prosecution's case". Johnny Cochran was a DEFENSE ATTORNEY...that's what they're supposed to do. It would have been tantamount to malpractice if that defense team did not pursue the strategy that it did. Defense attorney's are supposed to zealously defend their client. That's their job. You should appreciate the fact that defense attorneys exist, you never know. You may need one of those attorneys yourself one day.
@Maestrohbill
@Maestrohbill 10 жыл бұрын
@rockett- okay I'll bite. Let's assume Fuhrman's credibility is the issue. What's OJ's level of credibility?
@4ourthofjuly
@4ourthofjuly 16 жыл бұрын
This may sound odd, but I read that a lot of good came from this verdict. In that crime labs had to standardize aspects of their inquiries, this has helped our criminal justice system enormously. Wierd.
@ezekielmajor5511
@ezekielmajor5511 Жыл бұрын
Vince could not get over the fact that the prosecution got their asses whooped. He's trying to come to their rescue. Too little to late Vince.
@ezekielmajor5511
@ezekielmajor5511 Жыл бұрын
Yes, Ito was correct in stating they owed the jury a debt of gratitude. They were sequestered for a year. Unheard of in the legal realm. Away from family, work, friends for over a year. Shut up Bugliosi.
@Solitude47152
@Solitude47152 3 ай бұрын
I agree. Vince is full of himself.
@NkrumahTure
@NkrumahTure 11 жыл бұрын
That makes Cochran's legal performance all the more profound. He was as much an expert in criminal law as he was in tort law. Indeed he was a prosecutor himself as he had formally worked in the L.A. City Attorney's office, and the L.A. county District Attorney's office. He tried criminal cases there, and had ample experience.
@tom8715
@tom8715 Жыл бұрын
As Vincent pointed out in his three-and-a-half-hour summation on the o.j. Simpson case Johnnie Cochran was by no means an expert in criminal law. Cochran made most of the name for himself as a civil lawyer. Cochran also exhibited his superficial knowledge during the criminal trial.
@theliberatedmimi
@theliberatedmimi 6 жыл бұрын
But we know how he got that cut.
@88jmct
@88jmct 13 жыл бұрын
@whisky beauty 2 It was Clark and Darden's incompetence.
@PurpleHounding
@PurpleHounding Жыл бұрын
Why didn't they go to Nicole's next of kin? That wasn't OJ.
@user-ct3rq5om1j
@user-ct3rq5om1j 2 ай бұрын
Best ever !! Viva Italia
@gvran71
@gvran71 14 жыл бұрын
This guy is a stud.
@johnfox9169
@johnfox9169 2 жыл бұрын
I agree Bugliosi would have been a razor-sharp prosecutor, however, given this jury, would he have been able to secure a conviction??
@Tom-lv2mv
@Tom-lv2mv Ай бұрын
Unlikely
@randyharris2559
@randyharris2559 2 жыл бұрын
Even if the jury was inclined to let Simpson go a better prosecution would at least got a hung jury.
@anjie_j7026
@anjie_j7026 11 жыл бұрын
Its ok , johnny Cochran,robert k. those who helped defend O.J died . I guess they got paid back for helping oj get away with murder! karma is a bitch!
@founder287
@founder287 17 жыл бұрын
Still waiting for your point?
@charlesvan13
@charlesvan13 12 жыл бұрын
Vince made that point that OJ wasn't a part of the black community. So you're speaking of defending him out of pure racism.
@devinwatson4594
@devinwatson4594 Жыл бұрын
Yeah I can’t take buglibozo serious after reading part of his book that he was insistent that Oswald was the lone gunman in Dallas 😂rofl
@MarceloRomero360
@MarceloRomero360 Жыл бұрын
Oswald did it alone. The JFK film is fiction.
@ezmereldaglutz9151
@ezmereldaglutz9151 4 жыл бұрын
I agree with everything Bugliosi says however no mention of the gloves not fitting Simpson, which in my view, was the turning point of the trial!
@TDKiller415
@TDKiller415 2 жыл бұрын
Oh he's commented on that too. He does say that having OJ try the gloves on was a terrible mistake in the eyes of a biased jury, but he also points out that the prosecution provided photos of OJ wearing the same gloves before he killed Nicole and OJ and they fit him just fine. They were his gloves. There was a receipt in Nicole's name because she bought them for OJ as a christmas present. Thats the proof they were OJ's gloves, they just didn't fit because they had shrunk from the blood and being frozen and unfrozen.
@bernardtugar2965
@bernardtugar2965 Жыл бұрын
#### oj.
@jbzzl48
@jbzzl48 8 жыл бұрын
If you have not seen the photos, of 'the bloody glove' found @ oj 's place, please try. The cobwebs on either side are undisturbed. So oj jumped his own gate dropped a glove...then managed to not break one codweb, that would have been in his path, no matter which way he went. left or right after hopping wall, with those bad knees. really people? don't talk trash just look at the photos. Dr. Ler said "something wrong"..He's right.
@parker6022
@parker6022 8 жыл бұрын
+jbzzl48 What do cobwebs have to do with anything? You'll ignore O.J.'s cut on his finger that he admitted he didn't know how he got but you'll present undisturbed cobwebs as evidence of his innocence?
@jiggleykrowzer8768
@jiggleykrowzer8768 8 жыл бұрын
+jbzzl48 Don't ever have kids... don't function in society either... your mentality is frightening... that nigga is GUILTY AS FUCK... ROT IN HELL OJ
@jbzzl48
@jbzzl48 8 жыл бұрын
+Chad Hansen it's called evidence...no sense going any further with you.33, & du.b ad a post.
@parker6022
@parker6022 8 жыл бұрын
Evidence of what exactly?
@jbzzl48
@jbzzl48 8 жыл бұрын
try thinking...here we go...supposedly, oj hops a wall behing his house, where he drops a glove, he runs to the right or left after jumping the wall, goes around house enters his home. Now where the glove was found, there are old cobwebs on either side of the glove that are unbroken. no foot prints either, ruffled dirt leaves etc. the photo of the globe(fortunately)was taken from the outside of the wall, with the photographer leaning over the wall. are you getting this?...evidence colldctor, not furhman got the glove..he said he broke through cobweds to get to it...are you getting this..? ahole!!
@88jmct
@88jmct 13 жыл бұрын
@whiskybeauty2 yeah what prosecutor in their right mind would leave out the chase and the suicide letter. The letter alone was a huge admission of guilt.
@glutinousmaximus
@glutinousmaximus 11 жыл бұрын
Who is Charles Mansion? But thanks for your query - deary.
@peterdurkin8980
@peterdurkin8980 Жыл бұрын
It doesn't matter Vincent. The black didn't care about guilt
@jasontroy4723
@jasontroy4723 Жыл бұрын
Oj has a new book out titled . ( If i didn't do it )
@jbzzl48
@jbzzl48 8 жыл бұрын
You slick but not that slick Slick!!
@peterdurkin8980
@peterdurkin8980 Жыл бұрын
Vincent is wrong about santa monica
@nattyps3160
@nattyps3160 Жыл бұрын
So true b4 they drew blood oj admits he dropped his blood everywhere & says I have no idea. Cochrane as quoted by Kardashian who says " I have doubts about the dna & it's impossible the whole police force the forensics team the lab the da were all in on a conspiracy. " so that's his own lawyer & long time bff who ended their friendship. Cause he unlike the other lawyers knew & loved Nicole knowing her since she was 18. Ac also cried during the deposition when showed a pic of battered Nicole. He was so conflicted cause he loved Nicole knew oj beat her which he admits taking her to the hospital once cause he was so worried about her headaches frimom where ojs literal fist imprint was. Anyway Cochrane didn't believe Simpson either b/c oj on tape to the detectives & Cochrane himself kept saying I havd no idea how I cut myself & bled all over the night b4 ??? Cochrane Said " this man remembers every minute detail of his life since childhood yet can't " remember " how he got a deep gash on his finger the same night Nicole & Ron were butchered ??? Omg oj is so guilty. Finally that one woman in oj made in America said as one of the jurors she voted guilty " for payback that 90% of the jurors felt that way " & the documentarian was so taken aback he asks " is that right " & she did the ol lift the arms up shrug. Like it is what it is man.
@DS40764
@DS40764 4 жыл бұрын
One of the best Prosecutors there was; gone too soon. Yes Furman was not on trial and he did everything by the book and people witnessed to this fact(no conspiracy). Simpson engaged in other criminal behavior later on,as we know. I'm waiting to learn of the next offence,and I hope he doesn't murder again. He's a Sociopath.
@louishumphreys5451
@louishumphreys5451 15 жыл бұрын
I think is truer to say...only in California, and maybe a few other state(s).
@founder287
@founder287 17 жыл бұрын
And what's your point?
@88jmct
@88jmct 13 жыл бұрын
@Tippersnore LOL
@LetFreedomRing
@LetFreedomRing 16 жыл бұрын
So?
@cedricbeard4609
@cedricbeard4609 Жыл бұрын
He’s dreaming if he thinks the cop using a racial slur would have been inadmissible has he been the prosecutor.
@Clyde177
@Clyde177 12 жыл бұрын
Who are you to give up on us,it doesn't matter how you feel about black people.well,it doesn't matter to me, maybe a few conservative black people are concern how you feel. it's how we feel about ourselves. we have a lot of low self-esteem in our community that's what I'm fighting. I felt the same as lot of people that OJ was guilty but was very glad he was acquitted because of the LAPD Treatment of black people.. hate begat hate,remember that.
@bh1935
@bh1935 11 жыл бұрын
wow, this is so obvious.
@founder287
@founder287 17 жыл бұрын
WTF does that have to do with Bugliosi, claritycounts? How about backing up your words with... ANYTHING?
@nytbrd
@nytbrd 17 жыл бұрын
Your mother should be proud of you.
@sosueme66
@sosueme66 12 жыл бұрын
he sits in jail-finally!!
@jbzzl48
@jbzzl48 8 жыл бұрын
Accusing me of twisting info!! So typical the Serpant. Presenting oneself, as trying to be a voice of reason, & true interest. While the while having as biased an opinion as any other.
@oakjazz
@oakjazz 17 жыл бұрын
I've seen his sort so many times, never as good as they make themselves seem, almost always overrated with over sized egos. Denigrating his fellow attorneys and the judge was just wrong.
@spearfisherman308
@spearfisherman308 3 жыл бұрын
wheres your proof if you watch his short film on the case he knows what he is talking about.
@jamesmcgove
@jamesmcgove 14 жыл бұрын
@Tsnore Great simpsons joke
@peterdurkin8980
@peterdurkin8980 Жыл бұрын
Jury
@alexvanoverSlashTraxNetwork
@alexvanoverSlashTraxNetwork 6 жыл бұрын
Stop acting put out that Vincent wants to educate you geraldo!!
@BK-uf6qr
@BK-uf6qr Жыл бұрын
Bugliosi is an ego maniac. He filibusters frequently during his interviews. 3:34
@archangelvvv
@archangelvvv Жыл бұрын
GO OJ GO!
@MikeHunt-rw4gf
@MikeHunt-rw4gf 2 жыл бұрын
Algorithm.
@nath8282
@nath8282 13 жыл бұрын
Didn't OJ give the statement without a lawyer on June 13th? I think that is why they didn't bring it up in court. Also, anything about suicide could easily be seen as effects of Medication and losing a close loved one. The letter did not reek of guilt. This guy should know all of this.
@spearfisherman308
@spearfisherman308 3 жыл бұрын
bullshit arthritis medication does not induce suicide.
@oakjazz
@oakjazz 17 жыл бұрын
LOL, you seem a little bit upset, such language, you must be exactly what your abusive words suggest, with the right spelling of course.
@csdr0
@csdr0 7 жыл бұрын
Vincent, that deep cut on the knuckle of his left middle finger was not noticed by Kato, Allan Park, and the 4 witnesses: the two airport couriers, the plane passenger who was sitted behind OJ who was specifically looking at his left hand to see if he is wearing a championship ring and the plane captain on his way to Chicago. Some of them even asked for his autograph. Their testimonies were not challenged or impeached by the Prosecutors. The following day the deep cut was so conspicuous that it was immediately noticed by a fellow plane passenger sitted beside OJ on his way back to LA because of the bandage with blood visible on the sides. That deep cut could not have been sustained on the night of the murder. It happened inside his hotel room. Vincent obviously does not know all the facts of the case.
@jeffw1267
@jeffw1267 7 жыл бұрын
O.J. ADMITTED that he got the deep cut, and also stated that he didn't know how he got it. This doesn't make sense! I don't care about the witnesses: they are mistaken for some reason. How did O.J. get the cut, which he admitted to? Even if he didn't admit to it, the detectives could see the evidence for themselves.
@michaelbarlow6610
@michaelbarlow6610 5 жыл бұрын
@ csdr0. You obviously fail to remember (or deliberately and very conveniently ignore) the fact that not once but twice during the approximately 32 minute interrogation of Simpson by Detectives Lange and Vannatter, Simpson stated that he did not know how he cut the middle finger of his left hand , which as Vincent Bugliosi accurately pointed out demonstrated an unmistakable consciousness of guilt on the part of Simpson. When Lange and Vannatter first asked Simpson how he cut his finger he said, "I don't know" and later in the interrogation when asked a second time how he cut his finger he said, "I have no idea man". His statement that he did not know how he cut his finger very badly reeks of guilt because his cut was not a paper cut or just a scratch but was a deep gash on the middle finger of his left hand!
@advantagetennisinternation2427
@advantagetennisinternation2427 5 жыл бұрын
They made the mistake of charging OJ himself. He was with someone. Still to this day if you redo this case and charge him alone, hes not guilty
@NkrumahTure
@NkrumahTure 17 жыл бұрын
Bugliosi wan an outsider to that case, up to that point he hadn't tried a case in 20 years.
@NkrumahTure
@NkrumahTure 11 жыл бұрын
Bugliosi would have lost, up to that point he hadn't practiced law in 20 years. Johnny Cochran would have ate him alive, he would've loved going against Bugliosi. Bugliosi tends to get easily agitated in a trial, the dream team lawyers would have exploited that.
@jeffshepherd985
@jeffshepherd985 5 жыл бұрын
NkrumahTure you’re an idiot.
@TheGBPM
@TheGBPM 9 жыл бұрын
Bugliosi is full of opinion, speculation and conjecture, he has no facts, it's amazing.
@doppelbanger5797
@doppelbanger5797 9 жыл бұрын
i doubt you have read his books as he cites everything he says, he is kryptonite to conspiracy kooks
@HugoDuchovny
@HugoDuchovny 9 жыл бұрын
You're either a total fucking idiot or have no understanding of the case and evidence.
@aran125
@aran125 6 жыл бұрын
This dude was a total Schmuck. How bout this Vince? The Prosecution lost, and reasonable doubt is reasonable doubt. We get it that you are very unhappy with the verdict, but just cause you feel that way doesn’t make you “right”.
@garethwilby4033
@garethwilby4033 5 жыл бұрын
But he IS right, there is zero doubt that OJ is guilty,it’s impossible for him to be innocent with his blood at the murder scene
@SebMenard
@SebMenard 6 жыл бұрын
Bugliosi was bias on this matter... he JUST FORGOT that Furhman, asked the 5th about planting the evidence in this case. This speaks LOUDER than guilt.
@smurfarooney2003
@smurfarooney2003 14 жыл бұрын
oj is fucken innocent man
Vincent Bugliosi on OJ Simpson Pt.3   (1995)
8:59
Squirt37
Рет қаралды 72 М.
Dave Chappelle Thinks OJ Simpson Might Be Chasing Him | Netflix Is A Joke
9:37
New model rc bird unboxing and testing
00:10
Ruhul Shorts
Рет қаралды 25 МЛН
아이스크림으로 체감되는 요즘 물가
00:16
진영민yeongmin
Рет қаралды 62 МЛН
Alex hid in the closet #shorts
00:14
Mihdens
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН
Best KFC Homemade For My Son #cooking #shorts
00:58
BANKII
Рет қаралды 61 МЛН
O.J. Simpson: Endgame | Full Episode
43:25
48 Hours
Рет қаралды 881 М.
Howard Gives His Thoughts on O.J. Simpson’s Death
6:43
The Howard Stern Show
Рет қаралды 412 М.
O.J. Simpson: The Closing Argument
59:06
The American Law Journal
Рет қаралды 71 М.
Barbara Walters 1996 interview with Robert Kardashian
11:57
Curtis88
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Joe Rogan on OJ Simpson
11:46
JRE Clips
Рет қаралды 2,9 МЛН
VINCENT BUGLIOSI & DAVID TALBOT ON "HARDBALL" (MSNBC)(MAY 29, 2007)
13:55
David Von Pein's JFK Channel
Рет қаралды 38 М.
Marcia Clark weighs in on OJ Simpson parole
7:29
FOX 11 Los Angeles
Рет қаралды 81 М.
New model rc bird unboxing and testing
00:10
Ruhul Shorts
Рет қаралды 25 МЛН