Vincent Bugliosi on Geraldo Rivera's Show a few days after the OJ Simpson verdict.
Пікірлер: 295
@michaelwalker26765 жыл бұрын
'Outrage' was a brilliant, convincing book about the OJ Simpson trial. All of Vincent's criticism of the prosecution lawyers, the judge, and the defense tactics is valid and true.
@markross2124 Жыл бұрын
I read it also and agree with basically what he stated that it was the total incompetence of the prosecution. Also, he lost a lawsuit and as far as I know he never has had to pay one cent to the Goldman family.
@ryancalhoun29104 ай бұрын
@@markross2124He paid a little bit to the Goldmans. However, and I surely don't mean to suggest Simpson was innocent, but losing a civil case is not evidence that he committed the murders.
@samsca85293 ай бұрын
@@markross2124He has paid them but it’s far lower than they were ordered to have paid to them.
@MrDuds19842 ай бұрын
Clark did not call Jill Shively who saw Simpson leave the seen and ID’ed his license plate number, Vincent missed that one as well.
@MoneyOverFame8 жыл бұрын
I would've loved to watch Bugliosi prosecute OJ at trial, and go up against OJ's legal team. Bugliosi makes a brilliant and powerful argument against OJ in regards to this case ! Too bad he wasn't able to prosecute. R.I.P Vince.
@MoneyOverFame8 жыл бұрын
+Bman Chu I agree ! Vince was a brilliant guy.
@markanderson774 жыл бұрын
It wouldn't have been a different result, because there were no murder victims, and the trial was a huge screenplay. It was a drama. A hoax.
@vincentlem25344 жыл бұрын
I totally agree. Vince would have won and got a guilty verdict.
@lavarball84234 жыл бұрын
Bman Chu Well. OJ isnt a lawyer....
@BOBBYSOX86 Жыл бұрын
@@markanderson77 really? Facts to back up your claim?
@saramonson9903 жыл бұрын
I read his book Helter Skelter as a very young teen. He's the best prosecutor and a genuine seeker of justice for victims. RIP sir.
@Berkmugga Жыл бұрын
He’s amoron. This guy is rotting in hell for all the innocent people he put in jail.
@whataboutrob442 Жыл бұрын
@@Berkmugga Who was innocent that he put in prison?
@alvindlee1 Жыл бұрын
Homer Simpson could have prosecuted Charles Manson
@jvarela9657 жыл бұрын
RIP Vincent Bugliosi greatest prosecutor in LA history
@ryancalhoun29103 ай бұрын
And a great defense lawyer
@Jim_Harwood2 ай бұрын
Yeah sure. Vince believes a guy slashed two adults to pieces on his way to LAX airport. Yeah open and shut case 🤣
@gspendlove13 жыл бұрын
Bugliosi's "Outrage" isn't just the best book on the Simpson case ever written, it just may be the best book ever written, period. If you read it and aren't convinced, then you probably believe in vampires, werewolves, demons, the Loch Ness Monster, Bigfoot, and other nonsense.
@dyates63806 жыл бұрын
I agree. Loved it.
@nattyps3160 Жыл бұрын
Amazing plus his video 100% guilty convinced me beyond all doubt. A big problem for anyone was the trial should have been in Santa Monica once that mistake was made it was over. Clark Said every expert told her that at best w that jury after Rodney king was a hung jury.
@TVstudio17 жыл бұрын
I want to read OJ's book. "If I did It" I can't wait to find out how he really did it.
@gspendlove11 жыл бұрын
Ah, you wisely left out the first part of my sentence, which was "SINCE SIMPSON WAS GUILTY, AND COCHRAN HAD TO KNOW IT." The reason that was the only thing he could do was because he had nothing else. No other suspects, no alibi, nothing but his bogus charge of a racist police conspiracy to frame his client, which, of course, was complete bullshit. If your blood is found at the murder scene, you're guilty. Simpson was and is guilty of those two murders, and the jury's verdict changes nothing.
@BurtonRdForever5 жыл бұрын
You know if Vincent Bugliosi was prosecuting this case that OJ Simpson would be cooling his heels in San Quentin. Marcia Clark has the brass neck to appear on chat shows like some celebrity when her claim to fame is letting someone walk after committing a double murder with enough evidence to convict 10!? Vincent Bugliosi is Premier League whereas Clark is fighting relegation in division 3.
@pommiebears4 жыл бұрын
Burton Rd Forever 1977 she didn’t let him walk. She made mistakes, as does any trial lawyer. Nothing was going to convince that jury to vote fairly. They thought they had a point to prove....so, they voted not guilty.
@joeb2673824 жыл бұрын
@@pommiebears Pommie bears you are absolutely right. There was NOTHING any prosecutor could have done differently to make that jury actually listen to the evidence and convict Simpson.
@pommiebears4 жыл бұрын
joeb267382 exactly, Happy New Year! 🥳 x
@apebitmusic832 ай бұрын
@@joeb267382couldn’t disagree more. Prosecution made many many mistakes that could have been avoided. And that’s not hindsight. If Bugliosi had tried the case I have no doubt OJ would have been found guilty.
@AmusedChild15 жыл бұрын
If only Vince could have presented the prosecution's case against O.J. Simpson.
@MarceloRomero360 Жыл бұрын
Exactly!
@Indul114 жыл бұрын
Sorry Simpson killed his wife and Goldman, the evidence is powerful and compelling...............Simpson had never met Goldman in his life but his blood was found in Simpson's car....end of story
@daviddavis3389 Жыл бұрын
It's possible that Ron and Nic took OJs ride and went for a short excursion around L.A.??
@apebitmusic832 ай бұрын
@@daviddavis3389 are you for real? You actually believe that could be the truth?
@cm9859 Жыл бұрын
Vincent Bugliosi was brilliant! If he would have prosecuted OJ in criminal court, he would have gone to prison. I agree 100 percent with Vincent. He was so articulate and quickly pointed out his view points. Rest in peace. I want to get book "Outraged".
@TheRickster.4 күн бұрын
No, the race card was against any prosecutors at that trial.
@fabricatedreality82188 жыл бұрын
I love Vince Bugliosi...
@randers7817 жыл бұрын
Bugliosi's book "Outrage" is really good, if you are interested . . .
@enormerschwanz6 жыл бұрын
+Ed Kahler Why not?
@Solitude471523 ай бұрын
Vince likes to write ✍️ books and criticize others. That’s what he is good at. You don’t see him trying the case.
@gspendlove11 жыл бұрын
And anyone who has read "Outrage" knows that with a competent (let alone brilliant, like Bugliosi) prosecutor, Cochran would have been soundly whipped. Since Simpson was guilty, and Cochran had to know it, the only thing he could do was nitpick and try to poke holes in the prosecution's case. And since Bugliosi would have presented far more incriminating evidence to the jury (the suicide note, Simpson's incriminating statement to police, etc.) he would have wiped the floor with Cochran.
@johndeagle43897 жыл бұрын
Mental Poverty. The Jury.
@michaelwalker26765 жыл бұрын
The defense did not even introduce the Ford Bronco chase as incriminating evidence. Nor did they introduce the interview of Simpson by Detectives Lange and Vannatter. It impressed me that Bugliosi wrote that he could have proven Simpson guilty on that one interview. Before I read his analysis, I could not have worked that out from the interview transcript.
@obo77076 ай бұрын
Dont hold back , Mr. Bugliosi , tell us how you really feel!! Boy , what a great mad dog he would have been if he was in charge!
@Tsnore11 жыл бұрын
Considering the preponderance of evidence it is justifiable outrage I would say.
@fabricatedreality82182 ай бұрын
Bugliosi would have wiped the floor with the “dream team”
@markanderson774 жыл бұрын
Another point about the cut finger. Simpson claimed he had cut it by breaking a glass at the hotel room in Chicago. There is a serious problem with that explanation, as that backs up the time of the cut to after the blood is found. So he tries to explain his blood everywhere by saying he cut himself AFTER the blood was all over the place. And then you find his blood at Nicole's condo, which had to have been BEFORE he went to Chicago, and yet he wants pretend he hadn't even been to her condo anytime in the last several days.
@markmac22063 жыл бұрын
in his recorded interview BEFORE they had his blood sample he admits he dripped the blood at his house. his lawyers ended up claiming that was planted by Vannatter. not playing the recording in court might not have changed the biased jury's verdict but it was a huge mistake.
@jacktorse2813 жыл бұрын
i've never agreed with his jfk take but I absolutely have always loved listening to this guy talk.
@MyTony402 жыл бұрын
I agree .. but he nails it with the OJ case .
@Sumbolon3301 Жыл бұрын
Did you even read it? I doubt it
@jacktorse28 Жыл бұрын
@@Sumbolon3301 I did, all the footnotes too.
@Sumbolon3301 Жыл бұрын
Ok, with a conclusion in RH you disagree?
@7beers14 жыл бұрын
Geraldo should not have interrupted him at all. Bugliosi is speaking beautifully, saying what needed to be said. Just let him go, man.
@jlorde8838 Жыл бұрын
Because he doesn't want the truth spoken.
@lisafoos39489 жыл бұрын
Geraldo needs to learn to be quiet and listen.
@phizap9 жыл бұрын
Lisa Foos youve intrigued me to watch this lol ahhh geraldo,,,,i read his bio years ago,,,,,,,,,i told the librarian, "i didnt find his book so amazingly controversial" she says....thats why its on the "books for sale, 25 cents each ! table lol
@phizap9 жыл бұрын
Lisa Foos plus...i seen a clip of defending casey anthony !!! omg !
@lisafoos39489 жыл бұрын
lin reynolds No way! Is he out of his mind?
@Mike-012345 жыл бұрын
Love to see him in action against OJ "Dream team" or any prosecution he retired before cameras were allowed in court rooms.
@gspendlove11 жыл бұрын
As you should know, "not guilty" does not mean "innocent." It only means the jury felt the prosecution hadn't met its burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt (because Clark and Darden's performance was incompetent. "Monday morning quarterbacking?" Afraid not. Bugliosi brought up every point he makes here about the prosecution's poor performance in interviews DURING THE TRIAL, not after. He knew the prosecution was making grievous errors while the trial was going on, not after it was over.
@TDKiller4152 жыл бұрын
He sent Marcia Clark some advice on what to cover in her closing argument but apparently she ignored it.
@15Hamster15 жыл бұрын
Amazing how OJ got off with it.. only in America. Vincent is exactly right!
@TDKiller4152 жыл бұрын
The UK is going the same way. The Sun called Johnny Depp a wife-beater based only on allegations by Amber Heard, he had not been tried and convicted of any kind of domestic abuse at all. What the Sun did was libel/slander. Depp took them to court, but because the justice system is now compromised by issues of sexual orientation and gender (Amber Heard is a bisexual woman), he lost the case and lost his roles as Jack Sparrow and Gellert Grindelwald. In all irony, Heard has a record of physically abusing her previous lesbian partner, but her sexuality and reproductive organs won her the case here in the UK. Travesty of justice.
@MrFrankBullitt16 жыл бұрын
This makes me want to go to law school.
@fromaggiovagiola91283 жыл бұрын
You know Darden is now a 'Law Professor'.
@Mr_Bones.2 жыл бұрын
@@fromaggiovagiola9128 🤮
@Tita-gh3fl2 ай бұрын
Very interesting person allows one to study law in a more detailed and comprehensive study. Which some states or provinces Deny Deny deny
@anthonystick17 жыл бұрын
O.J SIMPSON IS GUILTY AS HELL!!!!!!!
@fabricatedreality82186 жыл бұрын
R.I.P. Vincent Bugliosi
@gspendlove11 жыл бұрын
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
@chrissellers35167 жыл бұрын
The jury taking only 3 hours to come up with a verdict just shows that they didn't even care to pay attention to all of the evidence, It should've taken at least a week to come up with a verdict to a high profile trial like this one that lasted almost a year.
@Jim.Jim.325 жыл бұрын
the jurors probably understood the DNA evidence far better than many of the people (like you) who have condemned them. For example the bloody sock was examined three times and each time no blood was found. Then, weeks later, they find blood on the sock. The prosecution argued the blood couldn't be seen due to the dark color of the sock. But when the defense allowed the jurors to examine the sock in the courtroom (even under poor lighting conditions), they could clearly and easily see a blood stain. A BOMBSHELL in the case.
@scottclark88565 жыл бұрын
@@Jim.Jim.32 ok so this hardly the bombshell you talk about. The dna testimony put many of watchers to sleep 5 mins in, and as a jury forced to watch it all unfold in its entirety must have been mind-numbingly painful. I bet they couldnt wait for thst part of the trial to end. A pair of black socks laying on the floor in his bedroom didnt, unfortunately for the prosecution didnt get the attention it deserved. Had they been socks of another color of course things would have been different. It was a lame attempt by the prosecution to attempt to explain why they missed it in the first place. However, it was stored in evidence the entire time and again, unless there's a conspiracy it offers a legitimate explanation for how the story unfolded. I also found it interesting that when the detective called OJ at the hotel to tell him his wife was killed, OJ went on and on grief stricken but only once, at the very beginning of the conversation did he ask how. He wailed on the phone shes dead numerous times, he cried shes been killed a dozen or so times but only once at the beginning did he ask how. Just the one time. I find that strange. Here he is a broken man, inconsolable with grief yet he asks just once.... how? I dont know about you but thats extremely telling.
@Jim.Jim.325 жыл бұрын
The sock was the most egregious plant in the entire case. In addition to the sock stain (which was examined 3 times by 2 labs and they all found no stain), a video of Ojs bedroom was taken the day after the murders which showed no sock on the floor. 30 minutes later when the criminologist came in and took another video of OJs bedroom, we now see the sock on the floor that wasnt there before. During that 30 minutes, Mark Furhman was in OJ's bedroom in that video. Whats more, the sock blood contained EDTA in such high concentrations to kill. The sock also had a wet transfer on the opposite side, meaning that if Oj was wearing them during the murders, the sock blood couldn't travel through his ankle. Ask yourself WHY would OJ leave a bloody sock in the middle of his bedroom floor if he was so careful to hide the clothing, shoes and murder weapon? Further, WHY would OJ be wearing $400 dress shoes and dress socks to begin with, when we know he was wearing Reeboks eating burgers with Kato just 45 minutes before the murders?
@scottclark88565 жыл бұрын
@@Jim.Jim.32 ojs blood was not taken until 6 hours following the detective telling oj your blood is at the murder scene, in the bronco, up the driveway and in your house. How do you explain this oj? I dont know. How did u cut yourself oj? I dont know. But yet arguments from your camp state witnesses were looking at oj on the plane, his rings, autograph sessions and no one reported anything unusual - but heres oj himself admitting when he couldnt explain away the blood how he must have cut himself at home before he ever left for Chicago. Btw, socks wet with blood when taken off will transfer blood. And please stop reporting the case facts out of sequence to bolster your theory.
@scottclark88565 жыл бұрын
@@Jim.Jim.32 and as you say be logical.... if oj was planning the murder wouldnt he want an alibi, wouldnt he indeed change his clothes and the italian loafers he was wearing were his everyday shoes. Expensive to u or I but his normal day to day shoes.
@Tsnore14 жыл бұрын
Did Geraldo Riviera ever find anything in Al Capone's vault?
@MarceloRomero360 Жыл бұрын
Nope.
@randyharris31752 ай бұрын
The jury let him go.
@kailashpatel17064 жыл бұрын
American people should proud that this man was a great citizen of theirs...An idiot would understand Simpson was guilty..
@jerrymarbury93656 жыл бұрын
Oj walks because a bunch of racists let them off
@johndeagle43897 жыл бұрын
Judge Ito was a disgrace
@fabricatedreality82184 жыл бұрын
Yes he was.
@stephenouma3 жыл бұрын
Furhman was the culprit, Clark was stupid, Darden was an idiot for asking OJ to try on the gloves.
@daviddavis3389 Жыл бұрын
@@stephenouma Ito was brilliant.
@Tom-lv2mvАй бұрын
@@stephenouma prosecution did a fine job,it was the jury that was stupid
@stephenoumaАй бұрын
@@Tom-lv2mv Marcia Clark was terrible. F- for sure.
@rkeppler363316 жыл бұрын
If you like Harry Potter, you'll love the Warren Commission Report. It's got everything; rubies, magic bullets, and the prince of camelot!
@sosueme6612 жыл бұрын
VB- so smart!
@hus3902 жыл бұрын
Blaming judge Ito for what?? Fuhrman didn't just used the "n" word. He confessed to having a bias against black men dating/married to white women. And the fact that he been to the property before in the domestic abuse case in 1989. You can try to convince the jury that race and OJ wasn't part of Fuhrman mindset but Judge Ito would have committed a reversible error if he didn't allowed Fuhrman to be questioned on his racial beliefs. ⚠️If OJ did it, he owes his freedom to Mark Fuhrman.
@Iiheosnjabskidbxbd6 жыл бұрын
See, CNBC just does not wanna others say evidence and truth !
@gspendlove11 жыл бұрын
I'm afraid you're very much wrong. Vincent Bugliosi was an active defense attorney at the time of the Simpson trial. He had not been a prosecutor for years, it is true, but he remained informed and up-to-date about any changes in the criminal law. And then there's his record: 105 convictions out of 106 felony jury trials, and 21 murder convictions without a single loss. Cochran? Never won a murder case before he represented Simpson, and was primarily a civil, not a criminal, attorney. (cont.)
@NkrumahTure11 жыл бұрын
"...the only thing he could do was nitpick and try to poke holes in the prosecution's case". Johnny Cochran was a DEFENSE ATTORNEY...that's what they're supposed to do. It would have been tantamount to malpractice if that defense team did not pursue the strategy that it did. Defense attorney's are supposed to zealously defend their client. That's their job. You should appreciate the fact that defense attorneys exist, you never know. You may need one of those attorneys yourself one day.
@Maestrohbill10 жыл бұрын
@rockett- okay I'll bite. Let's assume Fuhrman's credibility is the issue. What's OJ's level of credibility?
@4ourthofjuly16 жыл бұрын
This may sound odd, but I read that a lot of good came from this verdict. In that crime labs had to standardize aspects of their inquiries, this has helped our criminal justice system enormously. Wierd.
@ezekielmajor5511 Жыл бұрын
Vince could not get over the fact that the prosecution got their asses whooped. He's trying to come to their rescue. Too little to late Vince.
@ezekielmajor5511 Жыл бұрын
Yes, Ito was correct in stating they owed the jury a debt of gratitude. They were sequestered for a year. Unheard of in the legal realm. Away from family, work, friends for over a year. Shut up Bugliosi.
@Solitude471523 ай бұрын
I agree. Vince is full of himself.
@NkrumahTure11 жыл бұрын
That makes Cochran's legal performance all the more profound. He was as much an expert in criminal law as he was in tort law. Indeed he was a prosecutor himself as he had formally worked in the L.A. City Attorney's office, and the L.A. county District Attorney's office. He tried criminal cases there, and had ample experience.
@tom8715 Жыл бұрын
As Vincent pointed out in his three-and-a-half-hour summation on the o.j. Simpson case Johnnie Cochran was by no means an expert in criminal law. Cochran made most of the name for himself as a civil lawyer. Cochran also exhibited his superficial knowledge during the criminal trial.
@theliberatedmimi6 жыл бұрын
But we know how he got that cut.
@88jmct13 жыл бұрын
@whisky beauty 2 It was Clark and Darden's incompetence.
@PurpleHounding Жыл бұрын
Why didn't they go to Nicole's next of kin? That wasn't OJ.
@user-ct3rq5om1j2 ай бұрын
Best ever !! Viva Italia
@gvran7114 жыл бұрын
This guy is a stud.
@johnfox91692 жыл бұрын
I agree Bugliosi would have been a razor-sharp prosecutor, however, given this jury, would he have been able to secure a conviction??
@Tom-lv2mvАй бұрын
Unlikely
@randyharris25592 жыл бұрын
Even if the jury was inclined to let Simpson go a better prosecution would at least got a hung jury.
@anjie_j702611 жыл бұрын
Its ok , johnny Cochran,robert k. those who helped defend O.J died . I guess they got paid back for helping oj get away with murder! karma is a bitch!
@founder28717 жыл бұрын
Still waiting for your point?
@charlesvan1312 жыл бұрын
Vince made that point that OJ wasn't a part of the black community. So you're speaking of defending him out of pure racism.
@devinwatson4594 Жыл бұрын
Yeah I can’t take buglibozo serious after reading part of his book that he was insistent that Oswald was the lone gunman in Dallas 😂rofl
@MarceloRomero360 Жыл бұрын
Oswald did it alone. The JFK film is fiction.
@ezmereldaglutz91514 жыл бұрын
I agree with everything Bugliosi says however no mention of the gloves not fitting Simpson, which in my view, was the turning point of the trial!
@TDKiller4152 жыл бұрын
Oh he's commented on that too. He does say that having OJ try the gloves on was a terrible mistake in the eyes of a biased jury, but he also points out that the prosecution provided photos of OJ wearing the same gloves before he killed Nicole and OJ and they fit him just fine. They were his gloves. There was a receipt in Nicole's name because she bought them for OJ as a christmas present. Thats the proof they were OJ's gloves, they just didn't fit because they had shrunk from the blood and being frozen and unfrozen.
@bernardtugar2965 Жыл бұрын
#### oj.
@jbzzl488 жыл бұрын
If you have not seen the photos, of 'the bloody glove' found @ oj 's place, please try. The cobwebs on either side are undisturbed. So oj jumped his own gate dropped a glove...then managed to not break one codweb, that would have been in his path, no matter which way he went. left or right after hopping wall, with those bad knees. really people? don't talk trash just look at the photos. Dr. Ler said "something wrong"..He's right.
@parker60228 жыл бұрын
+jbzzl48 What do cobwebs have to do with anything? You'll ignore O.J.'s cut on his finger that he admitted he didn't know how he got but you'll present undisturbed cobwebs as evidence of his innocence?
@jiggleykrowzer87688 жыл бұрын
+jbzzl48 Don't ever have kids... don't function in society either... your mentality is frightening... that nigga is GUILTY AS FUCK... ROT IN HELL OJ
@jbzzl488 жыл бұрын
+Chad Hansen it's called evidence...no sense going any further with you.33, & du.b ad a post.
@parker60228 жыл бұрын
Evidence of what exactly?
@jbzzl488 жыл бұрын
try thinking...here we go...supposedly, oj hops a wall behing his house, where he drops a glove, he runs to the right or left after jumping the wall, goes around house enters his home. Now where the glove was found, there are old cobwebs on either side of the glove that are unbroken. no foot prints either, ruffled dirt leaves etc. the photo of the globe(fortunately)was taken from the outside of the wall, with the photographer leaning over the wall. are you getting this?...evidence colldctor, not furhman got the glove..he said he broke through cobweds to get to it...are you getting this..? ahole!!
@88jmct13 жыл бұрын
@whiskybeauty2 yeah what prosecutor in their right mind would leave out the chase and the suicide letter. The letter alone was a huge admission of guilt.
@glutinousmaximus11 жыл бұрын
Who is Charles Mansion? But thanks for your query - deary.
@peterdurkin8980 Жыл бұрын
It doesn't matter Vincent. The black didn't care about guilt
@jasontroy4723 Жыл бұрын
Oj has a new book out titled . ( If i didn't do it )
@jbzzl488 жыл бұрын
You slick but not that slick Slick!!
@peterdurkin8980 Жыл бұрын
Vincent is wrong about santa monica
@nattyps3160 Жыл бұрын
So true b4 they drew blood oj admits he dropped his blood everywhere & says I have no idea. Cochrane as quoted by Kardashian who says " I have doubts about the dna & it's impossible the whole police force the forensics team the lab the da were all in on a conspiracy. " so that's his own lawyer & long time bff who ended their friendship. Cause he unlike the other lawyers knew & loved Nicole knowing her since she was 18. Ac also cried during the deposition when showed a pic of battered Nicole. He was so conflicted cause he loved Nicole knew oj beat her which he admits taking her to the hospital once cause he was so worried about her headaches frimom where ojs literal fist imprint was. Anyway Cochrane didn't believe Simpson either b/c oj on tape to the detectives & Cochrane himself kept saying I havd no idea how I cut myself & bled all over the night b4 ??? Cochrane Said " this man remembers every minute detail of his life since childhood yet can't " remember " how he got a deep gash on his finger the same night Nicole & Ron were butchered ??? Omg oj is so guilty. Finally that one woman in oj made in America said as one of the jurors she voted guilty " for payback that 90% of the jurors felt that way " & the documentarian was so taken aback he asks " is that right " & she did the ol lift the arms up shrug. Like it is what it is man.
@DS407644 жыл бұрын
One of the best Prosecutors there was; gone too soon. Yes Furman was not on trial and he did everything by the book and people witnessed to this fact(no conspiracy). Simpson engaged in other criminal behavior later on,as we know. I'm waiting to learn of the next offence,and I hope he doesn't murder again. He's a Sociopath.
@louishumphreys545115 жыл бұрын
I think is truer to say...only in California, and maybe a few other state(s).
@founder28717 жыл бұрын
And what's your point?
@88jmct13 жыл бұрын
@Tippersnore LOL
@LetFreedomRing16 жыл бұрын
So?
@cedricbeard4609 Жыл бұрын
He’s dreaming if he thinks the cop using a racial slur would have been inadmissible has he been the prosecutor.
@Clyde17712 жыл бұрын
Who are you to give up on us,it doesn't matter how you feel about black people.well,it doesn't matter to me, maybe a few conservative black people are concern how you feel. it's how we feel about ourselves. we have a lot of low self-esteem in our community that's what I'm fighting. I felt the same as lot of people that OJ was guilty but was very glad he was acquitted because of the LAPD Treatment of black people.. hate begat hate,remember that.
@bh193511 жыл бұрын
wow, this is so obvious.
@founder28717 жыл бұрын
WTF does that have to do with Bugliosi, claritycounts? How about backing up your words with... ANYTHING?
@nytbrd17 жыл бұрын
Your mother should be proud of you.
@sosueme6612 жыл бұрын
he sits in jail-finally!!
@jbzzl488 жыл бұрын
Accusing me of twisting info!! So typical the Serpant. Presenting oneself, as trying to be a voice of reason, & true interest. While the while having as biased an opinion as any other.
@oakjazz17 жыл бұрын
I've seen his sort so many times, never as good as they make themselves seem, almost always overrated with over sized egos. Denigrating his fellow attorneys and the judge was just wrong.
@spearfisherman3083 жыл бұрын
wheres your proof if you watch his short film on the case he knows what he is talking about.
@jamesmcgove14 жыл бұрын
@Tsnore Great simpsons joke
@peterdurkin8980 Жыл бұрын
Jury
@alexvanoverSlashTraxNetwork6 жыл бұрын
Stop acting put out that Vincent wants to educate you geraldo!!
@BK-uf6qr Жыл бұрын
Bugliosi is an ego maniac. He filibusters frequently during his interviews. 3:34
@archangelvvv Жыл бұрын
GO OJ GO!
@MikeHunt-rw4gf2 жыл бұрын
Algorithm.
@nath828213 жыл бұрын
Didn't OJ give the statement without a lawyer on June 13th? I think that is why they didn't bring it up in court. Also, anything about suicide could easily be seen as effects of Medication and losing a close loved one. The letter did not reek of guilt. This guy should know all of this.
@spearfisherman3083 жыл бұрын
bullshit arthritis medication does not induce suicide.
@oakjazz17 жыл бұрын
LOL, you seem a little bit upset, such language, you must be exactly what your abusive words suggest, with the right spelling of course.
@csdr07 жыл бұрын
Vincent, that deep cut on the knuckle of his left middle finger was not noticed by Kato, Allan Park, and the 4 witnesses: the two airport couriers, the plane passenger who was sitted behind OJ who was specifically looking at his left hand to see if he is wearing a championship ring and the plane captain on his way to Chicago. Some of them even asked for his autograph. Their testimonies were not challenged or impeached by the Prosecutors. The following day the deep cut was so conspicuous that it was immediately noticed by a fellow plane passenger sitted beside OJ on his way back to LA because of the bandage with blood visible on the sides. That deep cut could not have been sustained on the night of the murder. It happened inside his hotel room. Vincent obviously does not know all the facts of the case.
@jeffw12677 жыл бұрын
O.J. ADMITTED that he got the deep cut, and also stated that he didn't know how he got it. This doesn't make sense! I don't care about the witnesses: they are mistaken for some reason. How did O.J. get the cut, which he admitted to? Even if he didn't admit to it, the detectives could see the evidence for themselves.
@michaelbarlow66105 жыл бұрын
@ csdr0. You obviously fail to remember (or deliberately and very conveniently ignore) the fact that not once but twice during the approximately 32 minute interrogation of Simpson by Detectives Lange and Vannatter, Simpson stated that he did not know how he cut the middle finger of his left hand , which as Vincent Bugliosi accurately pointed out demonstrated an unmistakable consciousness of guilt on the part of Simpson. When Lange and Vannatter first asked Simpson how he cut his finger he said, "I don't know" and later in the interrogation when asked a second time how he cut his finger he said, "I have no idea man". His statement that he did not know how he cut his finger very badly reeks of guilt because his cut was not a paper cut or just a scratch but was a deep gash on the middle finger of his left hand!
@advantagetennisinternation24275 жыл бұрын
They made the mistake of charging OJ himself. He was with someone. Still to this day if you redo this case and charge him alone, hes not guilty
@NkrumahTure17 жыл бұрын
Bugliosi wan an outsider to that case, up to that point he hadn't tried a case in 20 years.
@NkrumahTure11 жыл бұрын
Bugliosi would have lost, up to that point he hadn't practiced law in 20 years. Johnny Cochran would have ate him alive, he would've loved going against Bugliosi. Bugliosi tends to get easily agitated in a trial, the dream team lawyers would have exploited that.
@jeffshepherd9855 жыл бұрын
NkrumahTure you’re an idiot.
@TheGBPM9 жыл бұрын
Bugliosi is full of opinion, speculation and conjecture, he has no facts, it's amazing.
@doppelbanger57979 жыл бұрын
i doubt you have read his books as he cites everything he says, he is kryptonite to conspiracy kooks
@HugoDuchovny9 жыл бұрын
You're either a total fucking idiot or have no understanding of the case and evidence.
@aran1256 жыл бұрын
This dude was a total Schmuck. How bout this Vince? The Prosecution lost, and reasonable doubt is reasonable doubt. We get it that you are very unhappy with the verdict, but just cause you feel that way doesn’t make you “right”.
@garethwilby40335 жыл бұрын
But he IS right, there is zero doubt that OJ is guilty,it’s impossible for him to be innocent with his blood at the murder scene
@SebMenard6 жыл бұрын
Bugliosi was bias on this matter... he JUST FORGOT that Furhman, asked the 5th about planting the evidence in this case. This speaks LOUDER than guilt.