I'm looking to pair them with sub. Can you post the exact model and the model for the stands? I love concertos but they're of course a bit weak on the bass spectrum.

@@alenb9354 T9i

These are the old ones. The new ones are nothing like this. The entire philosophy changed at Sonus Faber after Franco Serblin left. It was less focused on a rich midrange and more focused on A more linear airier presentation and truth be told they are not even close to the same anymore. The top top stuff is impressive don’t get me wrong but they lost their magical midrange.

@@Puroplatino I just started looking into Sonus Faber because of their history and reputation. Whoever took over seems to have effectively killed the entire brand. Am I wrong about this? I hope I am but unless something changes my opinion, I am moving on. Such a shame.

I just bought one for €650. Just waiting for delivery. How's the overall sound of it? Is it really good just like what most people say?

They really are ❤

I have these on the dedicated stands and they are fantastic. Mine are driven by Sugden A21a Series 2 amp which can drive them brilliantly.

💯 percent

@@stephencosta6814still have this setup and love it! 😊

no, they actually help you "smell" the low end better.

audiolab 6000 is actually powerful, it's natural fit for the concerto's , tried that pair when my bro bought the audiolab 6000

Go for it fantastic amplifier go for the 6000A

I think so. I just acquired a pair and they do not have this nasal tone. I doubt it would be in the recording either

Un Instant de Màgia by Toni Solà Quartet is the song.

Maybe, but you are comparing a tenor sax (this song) with a soprano sax (Kenny G)

Hi what's integrated amplifier?

Try Shazam

@@pumaweek169 Un Instant de Màgia by Toni Solà Quartet per soundhound. Thanks for the suggestion.

…not possible!

Of course you're not going to get 'TRUE' piano dynamics from ANY speaker(s). Yes, maybe LOUD piano sound, but not dynamics. It's a very gross generalized comment you made..and I hope you're not being serious. Also, you do not mention the percussion's highly limited dynamic range. Why? Secondly, the piano is put 'behind' the sax on the recordings soundstage for a reason -I'll let you figure out as to why. You can also clearly hear that the sax is played (or recorded) with much more ambiance -thus, the sax sounds more 'alive'. Also, who knows how many times this KZfaq sound has gone through multiple low pass filters. Due to the pianos wider dynamic range, it will suffer the most from any compression. However, let us speak of tone, shall we? How could you possibly know the 'tone' of 'that' piano, in 'that' room, with 'those' mics? You just can NOT say such comments and have it mean anything. There is NO way you can know the correct tone of the piano, it is an impossibility. A simple angle reflections from two walls to the mic, can make tone change. But, then again, you probably have never played THAT piano. I hope you understand. It's like saying the moon is brighter in Spain tonight, than it is in the United States. There are almost limitless variables as to why you can not make such a comment. Does this give you an understanding, of the complexity, to say it has tone that is "slightly off?" I'm sorry J M Lathion, but your comment is based on nothing more than neutrinos zipping through your brain. If the following is incorrect, than ignore it. However, I doubt it, because I found you listed as an Analog Planet viewer. In all honesty, you sound like a typical audiophile making bold claims that they can hear this and that. Stop. Audiophiles contribute nothing to the 'act' of 'creation' or 'creating' music, but you all love to make yourself sound like you do and that you know a little something about 'everything' music... simply because you have a nice sounding system. Can you even hum concert 440?

@@vvcv__00 A whole lot of blah to make yourself feel better. There are better ways to explain something than the way you have here.

@@RennieAsh Wow, so silly. Of course Rennie. Of course there are 'always' better ways to do something. Why point out the obvious?As opposed to being a typical internet rat, running around looking for a nibble, why not come up with your own point and argue it. Please, enlighten us with your grand ways to describe an instruments tone in a recording. Finally, give us that "better" way to explain an instruments' tone and dynamics that has a frequency range beyond that of a device rendering its recording. Then get on with the much more complex acoustical nature of trying to reproduce an instruments timbre/tone from a box that is a fraction of it's size -to say the least. Give us your argument as to what kind of sense it makes for someone to say "A instrument sounds slightly off in tone and dynamics", when that instrument is magnitudes larger, with volume to play along with a symphony and tone so rich that no other device can replicate it simply because it is made up of different 'stuff'. You can't even compare the tone/dynamics of an upright piano next to a concert grand which I'm almost sure was used in this recording. I'm not trying to be an ass to the OP, just trying to point out that phrases like that have people spending thousands of dollars on speakers only because someone states (especially if they're an audiozine writer) it is only 'slightly' off from the real thing. Sorry, but Rennie, enough of the bullshit, it's time for honesty in this industry. And I never said anything about not liking the speakers, or belittling audio gear, it's my favorite hobby which is near semi-professional. Yes, I would rather be in a recording session, or a live performance, but being able to put on a piece of art and listen to it is pretty amazing; and I enjoy it to a great degree. I also know what is being said when it reeks of bullshit.

@@vvcv__00 So you typed all that for what? The point is, you may get your point across better with a kind discussion instead of making out like you're the only one with a brain ;-) People describe the way things sound because it's not always feasible to have a live listening session. You can simply say that you don't believe it's accurate to say you can tell the piano is not in good tone via a recording like this, instead of being condescending towards the commenter. Anyway, I know it's useless to tell old guys to change their ways :)

@@RennieAsh1. Typed all that because 'young' people have yet to develop critical thinking to the point of developing any argument that lasts longer than a twitter post. 2. You are obviously here just to to express how sensitive you are about a subject you have little to no experience with, and are here just to throw pennies around as if they're gold. When you're an adult, and leave home, it's going to be difficult for you i'm sure. 3. Your last statement is truly from the mind of a very young person and simply hilarious. Really, it shows no thinking skills at all. But since you're about 12, I better stop talking with you now. Oh, and if you ever make it into college, take a lot of philosophy classes. It'll teach you how to discuss with reasoning which does not look like something on facebook or whatever social media you spend 90% of your day looking at. So glad I have a youtube ignore app! Go take a walk off the planet, and learn something as you're floating out there....and...ingnored!

Well, not quite the same…or why are you listening then?!

@@bikemike1118 I don't

😂 there is always one rouge isn’t there.🎉

Simply beautiful sound , I will try to hunt some down!!