Hey Dragos! I am glad I could help. I ordered off of ebay and it arrived sooner than they said, so that was cool. But I did check the tracking alot to see how it was doing. Now I have ordered some binoculars from visionking as well. I will do more research into visionking but so far I really like them.

Well, I bought it ! I purchased this model : www.aliexpress.com/item/382312614.html?spm=2114.12010612.8148356.8.61871459v6Jp2a . There, you can read MY review........It's the 3 * one........

OK. That's not weird.

This is exactly what I was wondering - I just bought a Maven 15-45 spotting scope (about $1k CDN), which was a bit more than 2x the price of the Visionking 30-90x100 reviewed here. So it appears that had I done a bit more searching, I could have bought twice the scope at half the price. But after reading your note Teleman01, I'm curious if you did indeed see any appreciable change at the gun range between your 45x Vortex and the 90x Visionking? The gun range is exactly where I'd be using these scopes as well, BTW I hope you can provide a response to this question, I am very interested to see what your results were.

@@Kismetix I actually took it to the range. Looked out from 100 to 500 yards. The scope is every bit as good as my Vortx, as far as optics. But I only see about 15% more magnification. A little more picture with that huge lens. But not as much as I thought. Crazy how 90 X isn't showing more magnification. Other than that, I ended up selling my vortex and made about 450 USD. That paid for the 90x scope and I put money in my pocket.

@@Teleman01 Many thanks for your excellent response Teleman01, which is greatly appreciated. I guess from what you say, I'll hang onto the Maven because it is quite compact - but I'll buy the Visionking anyway as a backup and maybe take it to the range for distances past 500 yards (that extra bit of magnification and field of view may be helpful).

Buy a better quality low magnification spotter and use your phone zoom. The Athlon Ares UHD G2 15-45x65 is the same spotter as the Maven version and a lot cheaper.

Hello! I have had the visionking for a few weeks now and I am still impressed. I have used it on the moon through the window from inside the house and it was great. This weekend I will take it outside to the lake and also out at night to see which stars and planets I can see. I do not have any experience with the celestron 100 ultima but I have just watched a few video reviews here on KZfaq and it seems very nice also but I think you would not be disappointed pointed with the visionking. Are you thinking of attaching a camera? I will see how that works this weekend.

@@1hughbetcha Yes I'm planning to use a camera with it. Is it possible to exchange the eyepiece of this scope?

I will check the eyepiece this weekend and let you know!

@@1hughbetcha Hi, i will buy this scope, and once again, thanks for your video. Do you recommend any full size tripod compatible with it?

Hey Fabio Cool that you have decided to get this scope! So i do not think it possible to remove the eye piece to install a camera adapter. Also at the moment I am using a regular camera tripod but I would like to upgrade to something a little stronger. Let me know what you think when you get yours!

hello Shahid! So, because I own a Visionking scope i can verify that the zooming is very good! the svbony looks good but I have not had a chance to try it for myself. So I would recommend the Visionking! Let me know what you think when you recieve it!

@@1hughbetcha sir I have ordered vision king 25-75x70 spotting scope....but one thing I have heard that Celestron C100 spotting scope zoom power is upto 75x but it can reach 150x by changing it's eyepiece . So what do you say about 150x Zaman of Celestron c100 in comparison with Vision king 75x spotting scope. Regards

Hello Shahid! I cannot find any information on the Celestron C100 spotting scope. I can find the Celestron C90 MAK spotting scope and the Celestron Ultima 100mm spotting scope. Did you mean one of these two? Mark

@@1hughbetcha yes sir I mean to ask both of these that you mentioned above. Regards

@@shahidzaman4955 Hello Shahid! So the celestron ultima 100 is very close to the visionking spotting scope and uses the same kind of technology. My visionking 100 has zoom from 30x to 90x. The Celestron has a 22x until 66x zoom eyepiece included but it seems you can put in other eye pieces and even attach a camera so that is pretty cool! The Celestron c90 MAK is a spotting scope that is more like a telescope but you do see the image normally and not upside down as in a telescope. With this one you can change eye pieces just as you would with a telescope. It would be interesting to try this one out, Let me know what you choose!

hello Jeremy! when you say 223 holes on paper, what does this mean? is this something like a standard target paper? let me know and I will get some and find out for you. but until then, here at the lake I was able to clearly see the face of a bald eagle at 2 kilomètres across the water. let me know!

@@1hughbetcha just holes about thr size of a pen cap tip.

Yes just plain white target paper.

@@jeremyd2003 great I will find songe and let you know!

@@1hughbetcha thanks!

สวัสดี! ไม่ทราบว่ามีขายในไทยหรือเปล่าครับ.. ฉันสั่งซื้อของฉันออนไลน์จากอีเบย์ ฉันมีของฉันในมอนทรีออล แคนาดา! ฉันรักมัน!

أهلا! أعيش في مونتريال ودفعت 400 دولار أمريكي بالدولار الكندي

I think 400$ Canadian equals 23,758 indian rupees

مرحبًا! لقد دفعت حوالي 400 دولار أمريكي بالدولار الكندي

هل تستطيع ان تبعثلي واحد كم السعر الى الجزائر

Andy! very close! yet I tend to think of it more as min[imum+] Payne

@@1hughbetcha I do not know English well, perhaps there is a play on words in your answer, but I did not quite understand it. Did you mean that you think you have minimal resemblance to Max? When I saw the preview, I thought it was him: D

@@Andy-hf7hm hello Andy! No trouble! But I did not know who Max Payne was, so I had to find it on the internet and now I know. And no, I am not Max Payne!

@@1hughbetcha It is clear that not Max, but there is a similarity)

привет Ха-ха! Да, бесплатно включенный штатив не самого высокого качества. Но меня все равно это удивило. Я быстро купил новый штатив и сделал обзор на него здесь. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ea-KobeBytHRpqc.html Дайте мне знать, что вы думаете. Но для самого размаха это очень хорошо. Нет никаких сомнений, что если вы потратите в 3 раза больше денег, вы получите прицел более высокого качества. Этот прицел обошелся мне в 400 долларов в Канаде, и я им очень доволен. Я использую его днем, я использую его ночью, а также использую его в сумерках и на рассвете! Вещи, которые вы упоминаете, верны, но не так важны. Я определенно использовал x90 ночью при съемке луны и звезд, но потеря деталей в сумерках - это нормально даже для человеческого глаза. Это не космический телескоп Джеймса Уэбба! Но я впечатлен этим, и я не нахожу, что у него много ограничений по этой цене. Hello! Haha! Yes the free included tripod is not the highest quality. But I was still surprised by it. I did quickly purchase a new tripod and did a review of that here. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ea-KobeBytHRpqc.html Let me know what you think. But for the scope itself it is very good. There is no doubt that if you spend 3 times the amount of money you will have a higher quality scope. This scope cost me $400 in Canada and I am very happy with it. I use it in the day, I use it at night, and I use it at dusk and dawn too! The things that you are mentioning are true but not so significant. I have definitely used x90 at night on the moon and stars, but losing detail at dusk is just normal even to your human eye. This is not the James Webb deep space telescope! But I am impressed with it and I do not find it has many limitations for this price.

​@@1hughbetcha Штатив покупается для конкретных целей и по ценовому диапазону. Vanguard Alta Pro 2 адекватный и нормальный, но его органы управления в виде кастрированных маленьких рукояток... ну так себе) Я думаю за этот ценник можно приобрести более надежную и проверенную модель от Манфротто, что-то вроде 290xtra но это дело вкуса. Штатив и голову я подбирал отдельно. Я лично люблю штатив на зажимных клипсах. У меня в принципе классика. Это Манфротто 055 и голова mvh502ah вот она суперская. до 6-7 кг плавный ход и полноценная большая рукоять это очень очень приятно. Ещё и система контрбаланса с панорамным регулированием. Вообщем полный контроль и удовольствие за вменяемые деньги. Моя Зрительная труба на этом штативе стоит Сваровски STX 30-70X115 прямая не угловая, куплена ещё до роста цен за 5300$ сейчас цена в России улетела за 9600$..... Про трубу скажу в чем разница. А именно изображение не уменьшается с увеличением. И как была яркая, резкая и сочная картинка на x30, так и на x70 она великолепна от края до края. Это истинное удовольствие от процесса наблюдения. Так же можно поставить фирменный Телеконвертор, но там уже темнее будет. Хотя днем все так же отлично.

@@Potniyfallujah спасибо за описание 👍🏼 а вы из какого города ? Ваша труба на 70х все равно же темнеет ? Зрачок выходной же вдвое уменьшается …. Резкость я понимаю за такую сумму наверно в порядке ) но как она может оставаться светлой ?)

@@user-sw7mb1ke1d Я из москвы. Но сейчас живу в Турции на удаленке работаю. Взбираюсь на местные горы и наблюдаю в трубу =) Небо кстати куда лучше и чище. Точнее много чистых дней для наблюдений не закрытых облаками. Владимир, разумеется темнеет. если будете в сумерки повышать кратность вы конечно заметите, но результат не будет кардинально отличаться. Вообще... это сложно так словами описать, что значит темнеет для такой трубы с таким большим стеклом и с чем сравнить. Не очень корректно получается и у человека остается недопонимание, так как в его понимании, изображение становится существенно темным и он основывался на своём опыте использования оптических приборов. Опять же разные условия наблюдения. За звездами, по наземке где есть искусственный свет, свет луны или его нет. Потому что проще именно посмотреть, чем так описывать темнеет или не темнеет. Телеконвертора у меня нет. Но он подразумевает дневное наблюдение. Но был бы не лишним =) Мне вполне хватает базового увеличения.

Hello! Maybe 15 minutes is too long, bit it is easy to fast forward to the end! But thank you to say it is a great video! I try my best! Mark

@@1hughbetcha I found the review insightful, some people want more some people wat less, you ca get less out of more but you can't make more out of less. Thanks for this great review!

Ha ha! Ok let's see your images.

i am still alive! thank you for asking. i bought one of those cell phone holders to take pictures to be able to show you but it is a terrible holder i cannot get very good photos. but! the other day I saw a bald eagle at 2km and i could see his face! so that was pretty good!

@@1hughbetcha será que essa marca visionking é original eu comprei um comprei um desses e estou esperando chegar sou do Brazilian🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦

@@1hughbetcha привет. Когда новое видео будет? Очень жду. Тоже хочу такую заказать.