The Bible is a reliable collection of historical documents written down by eyewitnesses in the lifetime of other eyewitnesses. They report to us supernatural events that took place of fulfillment of specific prophesies and claim that their writings are divine rather that human in origin. Thank you Brother Voddi. Yay!!! No one can stop us now,. Peter wrote it, and we couldn't put this together. TWO SENTENCES. Glory to God in the highest. So shall it be! 😂

Just C Peter didn't write it actually

Jina Kay Henry Except its not

Is the bible reliable? The dead walked the streets, a man walked on water, rose from the dead etc etc? I mean, these are fantastic claims, but none of them are corroborated outside of the bible. There are living eye witnesses to claims of magic about Satya Sai Baba, or alien abductions and we don't believe that (I hope). But we are expected to believe magical claims in a book, why not the quran or the bhagavad gita?

ok fanriffic The Bible IS the corroboration isn't it? It's right in the sermon -- a collection of books written by eye witnesses over thousands of years by some 40 writers who's testimonies corroborate each other. Not to mention the accurate fulfillment of prophecy which (if I'm not mistaken) was deliberately put forth by God as further proof of the Bible's authenticity.

Go for it!!

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bM-Slq6T29LcY30.html

@@Waynyce hahaha, u believe a guy, wlth no head?

Then you hear someone saying they don't matter. I'll be like come on.

The Holy Bible is the most accurate book of documents on this planet. God's the Master and King of the universe. My CREATOR is AWESOME.

@@jesussaves4317 First off, the Bible is corrupted and it contains many contradictions. Secondly, Jesus (PBUH) is not God. He was a Prophet of Allah (SWT) Evidence: 1. According to Bart Erman, the Bible is corrupted and it contains many contradictions. 2. The Gospel writers are anonymous. We don't even know who wrote them. Mark, Matthew, John and Luke are just names. Where is their biography? Who were these people?

@@rafayshakeel4812 Uh... Read the Bible? The gospels are the same story written by different eyewitnesses. Another thing, saying that another man's word is evidence has to be (with all do respect) the weakest argument for this. I refuse to believe that another man word is evidence for something.

@@rbpost5219 Hi there! The gospels are not the same. They don't narrate the same story. And I wasn't citing an average person on the street, I'm talking about Professor Bart Erman. He's a NT Scholar focusing on textual criticism of the New Testament. As I said earlier, there are many contradictions in the Bible, for example: How did Judas die? I'm not trying to corner you, brother. But you're basing your salvation on a book that is filled with contradictions. I'd encourage you to look into Islam.

also, 1 Cor. 2:14 "But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised."

he eyewitnesses are not even named , the supernatural events are claimed, nothing 2 c here. ps. your book gets the age of the universe wrong by 13 billion years, whoops.

@@christopherianlister5212 They aren't named _in the books themselves_ , but we have reliable sources stating who the writers were. The supernatural events are _mostly_ claimed, however for things like the Resurrection, we know that the apostles really believed in it because they were harshly persecuted and brutally executed for that belief. They saw the risen Jesus with their own eyes, touched Him, spoke with Him, etc. This was not a hallucination because you can't touch a hallucination and 11+ people do not see a hallucination at the same time, in the same place, of the exact same thing. That would almost be a greater miracle than the Resurrection itself. They really believed in this and DIED for this. And how does the Bible get the age of the universe wrong? The Bible doesn't even state the age of the universe, and all man-given ages are theories.

Zach Parisi - 🌈🌈🌈🌈👌👌. The Holy Spirit leaps in you when You do that .😍.

@@christopherianlister5212 nothing 2 c here? Interesting. Is that ur evidence against it?

Which sermon was it?

@@eagleclaw1179 I think Viki would be talking about this video ... kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oZ6EitdytLqtc4U.html

So did I. God bless ❤

He is a great preacher.✝️👍🏻

Amen!

Micah Esther, based upon your comment . . . I believe you will be interested in, enlightened by, helped by, and appreciate, the videos and other information available at this website: boldlysettingcaptivesfree.com.

Topical preaching as a norm has harmed the church big time!

LEGEND!!!

I’ll try my best to answer, so I’ll be using something I’ve heard as a response to a question like this. Finding a book that is historically accurate is common. Finding a book that has tales of supernatural events is common. Finding a book the speaks about a divine being is common. But one thing that separates all things from the Bible is Jesus Christ Himself. What all religions have in common (at least in my knowledge) is the way to salvation. It is usually works based or in other words, humans doing what THEY can to get to heaven/salvation. Jesus on the other hand, came to US so that we may have eternal salvation through Him. He is the only one that came to us, became a servant for us, and died for us. I guess your question also depends on your view of truth. If you believe there is an objective truth (which is what I heavily emphasize is true), then only one religious text can be true, not all. If you believe that truth is subjective, that it matters of perspective and opinion, then it becomes difficult to answer. If truth were subjective, it wouldn’t be truth, it would just be opinion

@@mariamargiyeva531 i don’t see why this difference (jesus christ) makes the bible valid tho? i don’t really like this argument as i see it preached time and time again at my church. it’s not really valid because it assumes that there is a “heaven,” and it also assumes that the way people live their lives affect the place they ultimately go to. it’s honestly a straw man and begging the question fallacy. these are all unsubstantiated claims i have no reason to believe. i don’t see how jesus’ existence (if he even existed) proves that an actual deity and afterlife exist.

@@dilfhunter5645 I have to look into this more deeply myself but historians do claim that Jesus existed, it’s a fact. The problem is the resurrection. That’s why this video is so important, because Voddie stated multiple claims as to why Jesus is true and reliable. That’s why I started talking about truth, Jesus can not be true while Buddha is also the way to salvation ykwim? All I can say is, after accepting that Jesus is Lord He hasn’t let me down in the slightest. Always there when I need Him, and always there to guide me. Long story short, if you can provide sufficient proof that Jesus did in fact resurrect, then other religious texts would not be valid or true because Jesus showed that only through Him can someone reach heaven. Sure, some religious texts do have truth or teach things like kindness or generosity, but once again, if Jesus died on the cross and resurrected, He is the only truly reliable source.

@@dilfhunter5645 I’m actually also reading Matthew 27 currently, and it talks a lot of Jesus’ resurrection. If you wanna learn more about what they did to Him and how He died, I recommend reading it. It’s also a really good history book since it has been claimed by historians to be very accurate history wise.

@@mariamargiyeva531 i respect that. but another reason i don’t really believe in God is bc the way religious people live their life is all the same. the impact their god or religion had on them is basically the same between all religious people. what motivates muslims to do charity work and go to mosques? what motivates buddhists to separate their selves from the world and live a humbled life? and if one religion is true and all others false, then how do you explain the impact other people’s religion and god had on them? in the bible, it says that true religion is someone who takes care of widows and orphans and abstains from immorality. this applies to most devout people. not just devout christians, but devout muslims, hindus, buddhists, jews, etc. and again, ur using the same reasoning as baucham which i said i had problems with, since that applies to all major religions.

Black preachers? ... you need to be more like the white preachers that I've heard that preach the true gospel as well as the Black. Actually just more like a Christian and realize there is only one race the human race and there are those in Christ and those who are lost. Why you would think that black preachers cannot raise up to be biblically sound is beyond me but I'm glad you're learning and growing in Christ. God bless you

STL CLEAN; l did not say black people cannot be sound. please, do not read between lines, it makes us both look like jerks. if l can truthfully say that every black preacher who has ever tried to teach me taught word of life lies then that is simply how it is. I can also say that about all female preachers, would you use that to state that l believe all women to be liars who cannot be saved? I should hope not. however l cannot agree with what you said concerning race. while there is indeed one specie and one church and even one America there are still many many races. I am proud of my race, it has a very rich history. you should be proud of yours, l guarantee yours has just as grand a history though possibly very different than mine. The gentleman preaching above also has a rich history worth of pride as does all who can trace their ancectory back to the tower of bable where God invented race in the first place. As Aslan said into Caspian "You are a son of Adam and that is enough to raise the head of the lowliest beggar or humble the mightiest king."

MelodyAMc14 I love black preachers because they are so passionate about the Word of God.

The color of one's skin has nothing to do with the level of passion.

True, but all the black preachers that I have heard seem to have more.

Because most of the black community does not want to hear him .

I have prayed for all nations and areas that have yet to find the gospel -I believe you have been blessed to find it :)

AMEN

Is there a way to send Bibles to you?

Hey brother , how can you send the local tribe bible for our country ? can you please send email to me ??? my email ads uttam.mollick@gmail.com love in Christ

uttam mollick I don't know what I can do, but we sure can try!

Amen Brother, Jesus said they would hate those who love Him and stands for His Truth, for they hated Jesus first. Praise be to God!!!

@vilcantroper your response is exactly the kind of response to expect from what Paul writes about the bible being foolishness to the eyes of the dying. Instead of seeking your own heart and listening to whats written in your heart its. "Oh I need to be able to calculate, put God inside a test tube and measure him, research him until I'm satisfied, then maybe I'll believe. What is it you need to research exactly? State your terms, what would satisfy you enough to believe? Chances are you won't be able to define, because this is a heart issue, not a head issue. like you say it is. Also your statement about we sound ignorant is a circular argument, do YOU know how ignorant YOU sound when stating OUR ignorance? to state that we are ignorant about you, is to say that YOU yourself is enlightened to NOT be ignorant about this topic.. . meaning that the person that makes this statement is exempting themselves from the argument cos the argument is truly an obvseration about persons. aka humans and has nothing to do with the topic at hand. but at the same time you falsely equivocating it so is just intellectually dishonest. "Of course you don't" again another statement which imply that the statmenet maker aka YOU, indeed know some WE don't. again circular reasoning.

oh for giggles my favourite is "you ought not judge!" then why you judging me for judging! Love it how atheists have ZERO to ADD to the discussion other than just ad hominem attacks, circular reasoning, rhetorics, poorly contrived theories and whats even funnier is that they BELIEVE THEIR worldview is true! cos to say the Bible is false is to be aTRUE BELIEVER in the opposite, that THEIR WORLDVIEW is true. Off course mr atheist here will probably say something like "you mis representing my position" blah blah blah. classical matt delihunty style Or try to wiggle out by redefining what they DON'T believe lmao. I don't have enough faith to be an atheist.

Modesta, based upon your comment . . . I believe you will be interested in, enlightened by, helped by, and appreciate, the videos and other information available at this website: boldlysettingcaptivesfree.com.

An Ilinstruction manual for reTURNing to Father.

No need to brag now...

You are very blessed!

jbraxton11 he's not a New Testament scholar or a historian, as evident by his claims

jbraxton11, yes he is. Eric.... Read the book yo!

Engage the Broken - Read Bart Ehrman, Richard Carrier, Bruno Bauer, or John Remsburg YO!!

i guess title Dr. means he does not have an education....

@vilcantroper So our judicial system is completely faulty.

You didn’t watch the full video did you?

Don’t forget Dr. Chuck Missler...one of my favorites, GOD rest his soul!

Also listen to Charles Stanley and Paul washer my dear brother they are very good preachers 💓

YES!!! Please use as much as you like! Spread the word!

"The new testament is true because the new testament says so" is an example of circular reasoning. "The new testament is true because it was written by eye witnesses in the lifetime of other eye witnesses is not circular reasoning. However, "I don't believe the bible because it's claims are false" IS circular reasoning (I don't believe the bible because I don't believe it's claims").

And? You do not believe his message?

About that part where u say the baby crying sinning against the mother and the holy spirit departing from the baby, where in scripture is that found???

Alabama Lady does it matter?

And they will use the majority argument too, the dude who does lost Christianities explains the mistakes and confusing copying of biblical text. Though when answering questions he commits logic fallacies

But yet you teach things about ancient civilizations that are backed up by documents which are much less reliable the the NT? The earliest manuscripts of the NT was written decades after the original but the earliest manuscript for Ceasar's conquests was written 900 years after the original. Why do you believe things about Ceasar but refuse to believe things about Christ even though the manuscripts are more reliable?

I assume you take most Roman history to be reliable

Amen 💓💓you are blessed brother 💖.God bless you 💓

wish i could help but i got it from my pastor at south Reno baptist church. you can also find programs on the internet that convert you tube videos to video you can play on a dvd player.

Ikr. I want a "Bad Voddie" t shirt