This is a genuine cinematic masterpiece. It's insane how real it feels.

I couldn't sit through this and listen to someone talk non stop for an hour

I have to do a mock voir dire in my class today and this was extremely helpful, thank you so much

I stumbled upon this accidentally, but upon doing so I got tied up doing a few other things so it ended up playing for a bit in the background. Now, I don’t have any reason to comment here other than for the pure appreciation I have for the group that made this video in such a realistic manner and for the individuals (actors) that did such a fantastic job portraying their particular roles within this video. So, with that said, I wanted to commend everyone that was involved in making this video for their efforts that went into it. This was perhaps the best example of taking a mock situation and presenting it in a manner that didn’t seem “Hollywood” or “amateur”, but authentic and real (barring the naming of the plaintiff and the defendant, as well as, the subsequently named key witnesses and associates of course. However, given the facetiousness of the names used in this mock scenario, one must give props to the absolute professionalism displayed by all of the actors involved in this production because this so easily could’ve lost its effectiveness if any of them were to crack up at the hilarity of the fake names used. If they would’ve succumb to this and broke character, even for the slightest second, this wouldn’t have been the very real representation that this is.) Now then, I know that this is a rather long comment that no one will really care to read and I know that my opinion doesn’t matter much here, but that’s neither here or their and therefore isn’t the intent of my comment anyhow. That comment is meant for those individuals that made this and it is to express my appreciation for their efforts. Although this not something I needed education on nor is it anything that applies to anything I do for a living or that really appeals to my interests, the fact is that this is a very important event within the legal process. For that point, it is quite evident that the education that this video provides, by way of its superb accuracy in depicting all aspects of this Voir dire process, will assist countless people, albeit attorneys, judges, law enforcement, legal or judicial professionals of any kind or citizens that may be summoned to participate in this process, and that assistance will be paramount in the assurance that such a process will run smoothly and efficiently in the future if this video is properly provided to any of those individuals mentioned that may be unfamiliar with what to expect in this kind of situation the education they may need. Eliminating any hiccups or factors that may slowdown this process is, in my opinion, is extremely important because time is money and that means tax payer’s money...in other words, the faster that this process can be carried out, the better. And, I think everyone can agree that freeing up more funds to be adequately allotted to other things that it could be more necessarily appropriated to is, without a doubt, always a good thing! So once again, AWESOME JOB 👏🏻 to everyone that created this educational video. You’re work will be greatly appreciated by citizens across the nation, IF THIS VIDEO IS CIRCULATED APPROPRIATELY OF COURSE, whether or not citizens that never have to be a part of this process know ever know about this video or not. For that, I thank you and I say that on behalf of all Americans, for your time and efforts for that went into making this. Now...if you can only make an educational video detailing the events that were involved in the Mueller investigation. Lord knows that would save tax payers a fortune and, even more so, it would eliminate a plethora of headaches that far too often become unnecessarily abound when proper legal procedures are hijacked and turned into circus proceedings that are filled with nothing more than nonsensical garbage at the behest of corrupt agendas, albeit personal, political or otherwise! Haha In all seriousness though, thank you fir what you’ve done with this video and for any and all other educational videos you have made in this likeness! 👍🏻🙏🏻🙌🏻👏🏻👌🏻👍🏻🤓

Not the best episode of Seinfeld I’ve ever seen but I’m sticking with it.

A rough breakdown for future viewers: 29:50 strike for cause 32:20 objection 1:00:00 strike for cause 1:00:34 peremptories strikes

Wow. The person who made this must be a huge Seinfeld fan.

Educational. Always good to see a pro forma process carried out.

Did you catch what the Defense Attorney said at 43:51 ? This is not yet a trial, yet he is already stacking the deck in his favor. He is describing why his client acted in self defense before the trial has started. He has already putting a thought into the jury's mindset.

This was very helpful for me to understand Voir dire better for my v Class, and helped put me to bed as well. I will say, good acting. I thought it was real at first then started hearing the names.

How about the guy that claimed his kids are "perfect" and never fight? I would have flagged him as dishonest, sarcastic, or inappropriate.

My Jury selection for 2 days went exactly like this

In King County (WA) the bailiffs line the jurors up before entering the courtroom for voir dire so that the lineup is smooth and efficient.

This is a fascinating insight into the Voir Dire process.

At about 47:00 the defense attorney mentions several jurors that worked for or with himself, yet in the beginning the jury was asked if they knew any of the people associated with the case and they said "no".

Stacked that jury with the ladies for sure.

this is just the type of social situation id close up in. i wouldnt say anything and if called on, say the least possible. id feel more comfortable if it was just one one one.

Well put-together demonstration of voir dire, though I was also kind of hoping that the overall group of jurors would be a little bit less "perfect". I still salute your video, though! :)

the judge is sticking it to me, Jerry!

Wow. That's some lame voir dire. Both of these lawyers present excellent examples of how to get jurors to reveal absolutely nothing about their biases.

Well done!

This video gave me significant shrinkage.

10:46 "when Kramer told the police that SIENFELD was a CRACK PUSHER and then shot him" Me: 🤣🤣🤣

She summed up thirty minutes in 10 seconds..... Wow.

What are the chances of everyone involved in the case having the same name as sitcom characters?!? I’m stunned! Life imitating art I tell you!

Jury Nullification is a legal concept attorneys and judges don't want you to know about as a juror. Regardless of what the jury instructions are, you can still find a "not guilty" verdict in lieu of a hung jury/mistrial.

The guy with the perfect kids and step-kid, oh brother! Lol

COSMO KRAMER!! Hell Yes!!

Peggy Hill? This is brilliant. 😂

Most boring Seinfeld episode ever!

like jerry would say "good luck with all that"

I have jury duty orientation tomorrow too. Sigh

OMG, I stumbled upon this video because I just received a jury summons, so I thought this video was real until I heard that the defendant was Kosmo Kramer and the victim, Jerry Seinfeld. 😄

cosmo cramer? really? lol

Better actors than the real show.

5:40 "Mrs. Bush will be representing the state" (gag *fart noise*)

I should have known that this was a mock selection when I realised that Michael J Fox was the judge

Good acting! It seemed real.

Even better, find a documentary “Inside the jury room.” First time real jury deliberations had been filmed.

Versus Cosmo Kramer. Beautiful.

I watched the entire video and was a little disappointed. I was half expecting the procedure to start out with the Judge asking specific questions to specific perspective jurors. Questions like where do you work, what you like to do with leisure time, hobbies, travel experiences, etc., as well as some legal questions. And then the attorneys would also move right down the line asking various questions. That was my experience when I went through voir dire. That didn't happen at all here. It's been a long time since I've been called so maybe it's different now. Maybe the juror questionnaire covers all that now. I don't really remember filling one out.

called in to answer under oath questions about you and your family ? seems ridiculous and unconstitutional to me

Three people on the jury say they have worked with the defense attorney. If I was the prosecutor those three would be red flags to me to start.

What are the red and blue things pulled from the box when selecting jurors??

17:06 good one - goes to the probability of faulty eyewitness testimony -

Jerry drives a coupe deville?

29:00 The gentleman in the back can't put his hands where they belong

Forgot the rest of his name. He's Cosmo Kramer "The Assman"!

What if I'm not fair and impartial and quickly jump to conclusions and stick to them through shear stubbornness?

That women in green looks so chill.

Hmmm, I like the way in which this court is organized. Wow defensive murder is a super heavy one. Must consider all evidence, plaintiffs character, history, circumstances leading up to this and so much more. Peoples lives are on the line. I Mean defensive murder how? Who attacked or presented imminent threat to life first? Why? So much that you got to consider here.

That defense attorney knows half the city.

This has Arkansas written all over it.

@19:40 "If you have a reasonable doubt in the graver transactions of life such that you would have in a graver transaction of life then we have not proved our case" I have no idea what she was trying to say. I'm not convinced she knew 🤣

These must have been the scenes cut from the final Seinfeld episode.

For the people that got excused to leave at the end around @1:10:46 the judge mentions to call before Thursday. Is that so they can be part of another trial questionnaire? Or just to be informed they don't need to come back? Like until the next time they are called for jury duty?

Wait... that guy is 70 years old?? What???

I get this is a "Mock Trial" but did they have to use Seinfeld characters?

What have you done Kramer?!

Well done. Except real voir dire is never this, uh, thrilling.

Why was the women in the black vest wearing a shirt sporting a cat wearing a witch’s hat?

Sound was indeed bad, yet the TRUTH was told! Clearly, unjust...

In Texas we pronounce it as Voir Dare. . .

Ms Hill played the mommy card

Hearing "Kramer" got my biases triggered. For one thing, he could at least knock.

Is this an actual void dire?

OR SHOULD HAVE TO ASK ABOUT THE JURY BELIEVES IN THE CON > OF AMERICA ??? and their 1st AND 5th AMEMENTS ?????? PLEASE RESPOND !!!!

And there is someone by the name of Goerge Kostansa testifying, where is Elaine? haha

Newman did it! He always hated Jerry, and was jealous of Kramer.

Ahh yes. The classic “contest” episode.🤔

Is the defendants name Cosmo Kramer??? Seriously?

Hearing the names of Seinfeld characters really takes me out of it, lol

Holy shit this looks so real!!

Where is Dolores?

Uugh, all these coughers 😖😷 and throat clears on and on again and again and again. The same couple of people !! It was all I could do to stay and watch 😠

Is it necessary for the defendant to sit through the entire trial proceeding.

12:43 a lil Freudian slip

George Costanza Jerry Seinfeld LOL

Since when is voir dire the conduct a class in basics of criminal procedure? I thought it was a matter of SELECTING A JURY not teaching the jury all about the evidence code and so forth. Seems very much not at all like real voir dire.

I'm confused on the blue and red chips I'm under the assumption is Democrat or Republican if I was on one side or the other then you should be one solid color for my appears

I bet it was Bob Sacamano

Giddy up!

Does the black guy die?

hot judge

"Neuman!!!"

this is annoying, i don't wanna be there.

17:00 what is the foreman?

This is a real case an I Michael Beal will study the case in a real room.

poor jerry, rip 😕

The judges face is funny..

Why should they be impartial since it's the government that is threatening them with jail time?

15:35 "We do have a very good system of justice in this country" that was fucking laughable.

I knew Kramer would eventually kill Jerry Seinfeld.

That judge is easy on the eye, anyone? no? just me?

lol, how is that lawyer knows half of the jury?

They do a murder trial in one afternoon there?

Damn dude, Kramer did Jerry so wrong.

Wait a second! Is this a real courtroom voir dire? Jerry Seinfeld and Cosmo Creamer?

Anyone who said they didn't hear any this case would be telling the truth!! Best kept secret! LMAO!!

Lot of Seinfeld lore in here Lol