You can learn even more interesting volleyball rules here - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bteqi9mQ0K7MaJ8.html

I’m stunned by how you could compile the specific video examples in each case. Great video!!

you need to be more clear about which is team A and which is team B. very confusing with the videos, the commentary, and constantly changing angles and also why do you mirror-image the video so much?

Great job as always Nick, you deserve a lot more recognition from the volleyball lovers community. Pt. 2 absolutely needed 🙏🙏

Very useful tool for teaching how to officiate. I think I heard you mentioned in the Libero action in the frontrow that, "However, if the Libero protects the body/face instead of setting, it should be an illegal play.". I even turned on the caption to confirm it. It should be "LEGAL" as what the casebook says. Thanks!

Great video! Very informative and the plays were well chosen. Probably took a lot of time to reseach and make this video happen. Thank you! Would love more like this one when you're able :))

Your channel is unique. Keep doing it!

great video! i'd love to see more like this!

Great video. I have to ref a game tomorrow and in case some weird stuff happens I am now prepared!!!

Amazing video ❤

Great video, nice to know the insides of this plays... it would be nice to make the same video with less plays but diving deeper into them

This is great!

More of this please.

No interference if a hole Body lays between my two blockers at 6:00 ? I doubt it.

I could be wrong, but I think pulling the official off the stand might be some sort of violation!

6:40 the attacking side touched then net not the blocker. The rule cited is correct.

Thanks for the video. But I doubt about the blocking explanation 10:36. The definition of the blocking is not only about the contact point of the blocker is higher than the net or not, but also depends on the opposing side - is it an attack or not? For example, if that's just an overpass, the blocker contacts the ball above the top of net, it should be counted as first touch, no matter he/she can hit the ball back to the opposite side or not. If she/he hit the ball into the net and dig it by herself/himself, like the video, it should be called double touch.

This is a good video. I learnt a lot and im a coach

Amazing video. Can you make a video about double contact. Im having a confusion on setting the ball with spins. Sometimes its called by the ref a double contact and sometimes its not.

If i just have to end up with my hands above the net for my action to be accounted as Block, wouldn´t a lower receive that i transfer into a jump (in one smooth action) be one as well? Seems like one can use the ruling in 10:35 quite arbitrary!

Very interesting video, sometimes hard to follow for non native speakers. More pauses in speech to devide the content, perhaps less or shorter videos… could help me to easier understand. Nevertheless a very good job. Thank you very much for your time!

14:20 libero action within 3 meter, it sounds like you said that one case is fault, second case is an illegal play? I believe you meant that the second case was legal?

12:00

13:31 it's well before the rally finished on the video!

Only the play where the ball hit the opponent's hair on the way out surprised me.

if the libero protects the body or face instead of setting it should be an illegal play. I assume u mean legal here? 14:09 if so that's interesting didn't know about that one

dude who turned with the ref chair had some quick thinking

What if the opponent setter tries two cross the ball with one hand and i penetrate my hands over the net and block it. Whose point it will be

14:43 is js wild 😭

14:12...."if A, then it's a fault. If not A, then it should be considered an illegal play." What? No, if the libero plays the ball in the front zone with fingers and the next touch is an attack above the net, then it's a fault. not sure what you were trying to differentiate there....

I dont like the new rules about stepping over the middle line... Especially on amateur level it can make dangerous situation.

So you CAN touche the net if you're not playing the ball and your action doesn't impact the game ??????????

great video but you sometime mistake legal and illegal as a word

14:21 - don't you mean "instead it should be a legal play"? Since you give the instead and before that you consider it a fault if the ball is played in a setting motion? Also I don't fully get the image of the first blocking example at 10:15. Was the blocked ball on the side of the white team and crossed the space below the net into the black team? Then I understand, that the black team wins - of course. But if the ball repelled from the block sideways and passed in front of the net on the side of the black team, why should the black team [you should really make it clearer which one you call Team A and B] get the point? Weird example to include here - this one is obious. And also, you don't need to mirror the images. This is for educational purpose and falls under fair use so there should not be any copyright strikes against you.

11:30 blocking definition is wrong. It is not counted as an attack hit. It counts as a block if the ball is travelling from Team A to Team B and person from Team B touches the ball while a bodypart is above the net. As long as that is the case it is always counted as a block. So yes, the referee was right to continue the play.

Thats AI voice right?

wrong