10 years later, your set of tutorials on PK remains the best. The simplicity with which you teach is brilliant
@drimransaeed20084 жыл бұрын
Thank you for focusing less on memorizing new equations and instead focusing on the concept where they come from. Love your approach.
@delwinlong28002 жыл бұрын
This is the best explanation that I have seen, on KZfaq, about the volume of distribution. Thank you for taking the time to make these videos!
@adamspegele4707 жыл бұрын
Absolutely fantastic overview of the volume of distribution! Thank you so much!
@imthanatmutant4 жыл бұрын
After all these years of vague knowledge about Vd, This video explains everything so clear. You're so amazing! Thank you Professor.
@Lock33312 жыл бұрын
I lived before youtube. My life would have certainly turned out differently if I had such a wonderful resource like this back then. Thank you!!
@J1mE947 жыл бұрын
you are actually the best. The way you do mini tests throughout the lectures really helps too. thank you.
@mesfer1980011 жыл бұрын
I can't thank you enough ! I finally got a grasp of the whole thing
@halfwaygaming74242 жыл бұрын
Now I can define it conceptually.Now I am very happy.Spent 2 hours on that.
@halfwaygaming74242 жыл бұрын
I did mass in case of bioavailability with the help of analysis it's because of you.Thank you sir great jot
@Mellonyy3 жыл бұрын
Here 8 years later and still helpful! Thank you so much
@dr.deathium44872 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU SO MUCH! I watched several videos and read from different sources, but couldn't understand. Your video made EVERYTHING clear. I really appreciates it *smashes the subscribe button*
@bhargavi3683 жыл бұрын
Oh gosh!! Doc u nailed it!!! After long time.. For first time it made sense!! And I got the concepts clear.... Thank u for sharing this knowledge with us!! It means a lotttttt.... Thank u tonsss... 🙏🙏thanks a lot Great presentation and I'm totally into this playlist all this day👌👌
@StratasHai11 жыл бұрын
Concise and effective lectures! Thank you for making these vids; they're amazing
@mma2245611 жыл бұрын
So helpful! I've been confused by this all semester long; you are clearing my questions up with a short
@mace87048 жыл бұрын
This was very helpful. This concept was introduced last semester, but I always felt I had a very poor grasp on it until now.
@Ivan-mw8qk6 жыл бұрын
Thank you for making this video, doing my Emergency medicine primaries at the moment and I have found this invaluable.
@kosdaqjisoo9 жыл бұрын
Much Better than my pharmacy professor I really appreciate it
@vedantsehgal98362 жыл бұрын
Thank You for this, seriously. I finally understood this concept!
@natheerhussein90017 жыл бұрын
really thank you so much Dr. Saffarzadeh your truly amazing 👍👍👍
@salemal-shakliah15683 жыл бұрын
By the end od 2020, my Allah bless u ❤️ Many thanks
@duraivengatesan96749 жыл бұрын
Your videos are very useful and they are very precise.plzzz post more videos in pharmacology.thank you very much...
@indranilmukherjee78488 жыл бұрын
REALLY HELPFUL VIDEOS.THANK YOU VERY MUCH SIR.
@younessbagachoul58968 жыл бұрын
Thank you professor! You're really a lifesaver.
@sameworld19732 жыл бұрын
Best explanation👏🏾
@noorarain23104 жыл бұрын
Literally.. Thank you so damn much.. For making me understand this.... ❤️ ❤️
@MyBLuBb2 жыл бұрын
Very cool video - thank you!
@ahmedelamer23484 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for explaining such difficult objective🥰
@nuranemusayeva79465 жыл бұрын
Fantastic lecture. Thank you very much.
@ranamutaz67864 жыл бұрын
I'm very sorry sir, but i have another question. If a drug has high protein binding. Does this not mean it will bind to proteins and less number of it will actually be free, so theoretically and in terms of calculation, the plasma conc. should be low, and the Vd will be high. (Although it means sense that vd should be low since it never distributed).
@privilegedpotato86555 жыл бұрын
God bless you for such a nice teaching Could you please provide videos of lecturer series 14 and 15
@Xyzzzz1382 жыл бұрын
Great video!
@user-ip8sw1fr4v7 жыл бұрын
really thanks too much Dr for explaintion .. doctor can u explan the factors that increase and decrease vd .. and the reson for this factor in detail?
@ronald_kim Жыл бұрын
Please make a video on how to calculate patient specific Vd and AUC--perhaps addressed by the Sawchuk-Zaske method?
@ashwinisatpathy81839 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much. Brilliant.
@ronald_kim Жыл бұрын
Also, please make a video on how and when to apply the logarithmic trapezoidal method to calculate AUC.
@Meeraiyyer3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much sir.
@arazmed9 жыл бұрын
just one correcction. IV drug administration is not a kind of absorbtion because it bypasses the absortion barriers and first pass metabolism. So fastest absorptive rate is in inhalation not IV. You have to differantiate the absorbtion rate and bioavailibility. yes bioav of iv drugs are 100% but not absorbtion rate because they are not absorbed. Just a minor thing but sometimes important to understand. thanks for tutorial
@themasry50228 жыл бұрын
Highest absorption rate should be sublingual route Right?!
@mourilshah20545 жыл бұрын
@@themasry5022 all parenteral bypass metabolism that doesn't mean they are fastest IV or Inhalations are much faster
@docvevs10 жыл бұрын
Great tutorial. Most abundant protein in the body-- COLLAGEN. :)
@publichealth16814 жыл бұрын
Excellent video series thank you sir
@manishbhaichampaneriavraj36383 жыл бұрын
Hello professor As you said in the last question that new equation about dose and bioavailability And that exactly match with loading dose equation!! So would like to say that we have to remember only loading dose equation Thank you!!
@taharlekhoua19855 ай бұрын
The best
@nagulandevendran9728 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much,😍😍😍😍😍💙💙💙💙💙💙💙
@taihem201011 жыл бұрын
dude.. u just saved me!!! awesomeee!!!!!!!
@salam79053 жыл бұрын
thank you so much it was super helpful ^-^
@kommurakhila42654 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much...! It really helped out.
@hylianlegends9 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for the explanation.
@mirmirjan2772 жыл бұрын
Great explanation and you made it look so simple. Also, In problem 2 shouldn't the volume of distribution be 200mg? since only 25% of the drug is available after the first pass metabolism?
@veterinarypharmacologyvide23193 жыл бұрын
The amount of drug absorbed in to the body is same as that of plasma drug concentration, then how can we define Vd as the amount of drug absorbed/plasma drug concentration... plz explain
@sinyee77264 жыл бұрын
Clear explanation!!!
@meryamlazrak13293 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir
@songsandnonsongs8 жыл бұрын
anyone know what would happen if you had to calculate Vd of oral medication - would you have to calculate the amount absorbed or use the dose given if this is what you are given. Bit confused cos altho he says use mass absorbed according to the calculations the actual dose given is what the concentration is
@medmoss48 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the great videos
@mawaddashaban4778 жыл бұрын
Good work .Thanks a lot 👍
@ranamutaz67864 жыл бұрын
Areo Saffarzadeh great video sir. The only video that made me understand volume of distribution. But i have a question, how can the plasma concentration be assumed to be the same as target tissue concentration. I mean, isn't a low plasma conc. actually means a large volume of distribution, and so more target tissue conc.???? My question is, how are they (plasma conc. and target tissue conc.) proportional if plasma conc. is inversely related to vd and vd actually determines tissue concentration? Another thing that i can't understand is that isn't the main method of drug transport in body passive diffusion, so shouldn't there be an equilibrium between plasma conc. and target tissue concentration. I know the two questions are contradicting each other, but can anyone help. In desperate need of answer
@nalialm32487 жыл бұрын
You saved my life !
@moonibasem32264 жыл бұрын
Thank you alot
@77amams11 жыл бұрын
Thank you, wonderful video
@kimt583911 жыл бұрын
Great video, for the drug sequestered in the the fat and muscle are they active?
@doctorofpharmacologytoxico95563 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@caramel_honey2 жыл бұрын
Some books quote VOD in L per kg, can you please explain why?
@JoeB-mv7pg9 жыл бұрын
At time 10:32 It's fifteen thousand litres Or One hundred and fifty hundred litres Not one hundred and fifty thousand litres Just a correction ;)
@ameersaied8949 жыл бұрын
+Joseph Butawo Or one hundred and fifty thousand liters ***
@erebsargames96844 жыл бұрын
@@ameersaied894 doesn't matter how you spell litres/liters, same as aluminum/aluminium
@922sahar11 жыл бұрын
great video, i just missed this point: does increased capillary permeability lead to a high or low Vd and why?
@yasminwalid42342 жыл бұрын
please can you continue explaining pharmacology
@geminiflux012 жыл бұрын
you are wonderful!!!
@nicoshea-korbut10846 жыл бұрын
If you say Vd= amount of drug absorbed into the body/plasma drug conc, What is the difference between the value of the amount of drug absorbed if it is p.o form vs the [plasma]? wouldn't it be the same value? Earlier in the video you say Vd=dose/[plasma] but the dose (mass) would not be the same as the absorbed mass? I'm just really confused.. Does Vd equation use the' dose (mass admin)/ [plasma] or 'amount drug absorbed/plasma' Thanks for the videos though! they are amazing!
@areosaf11 жыл бұрын
good catch, thanks!
@ranamutaz67864 жыл бұрын
Areo Saffarzadeh great video sir. The only video that made me understand volume of distribution. But i have a question, how can the plasma concentration be assumed to be the same as target tissue concentration. I mean, isn't a low plasma conc. actually means a large volume of distribution, and so more target tissue conc.???? My question is, how are they (plasma conc. and target tissue conc.) proportional if plasma conc. is inversely related to vd and vd actually determines tissue concentration? Another thing that i can't understand is that isn't the main method of drug transport in body passive diffusion, so shouldn't there be an equilibrium between plasma conc. and target tissue concentration. Please forgive these inconveniences of mine, i know my two questions contradict each other, but i really can't understand. Hope you help me, i know you posted this video 7 years ago, but let me just hope for a reply, and i appreciate your efforst so much
@ranamutaz67864 жыл бұрын
@Areo Saffarzadeh I'm very sorry sir, but i have another question. If a drug has high protein binding. Does this not mean it will bind to proteins and less number of it will actually be free, so theoretically and in terms of calculation, the plasma conc. should be low, and the Vd will be high. (Although it means sense that vd should be low since it never distributed).
@Elka92111 жыл бұрын
these are amazing, thank you!
@vague-28145 жыл бұрын
Hi doctor Areo Saffarzadeh, I really highly appreciate all of your efforts in this and other videos. I’m wondering about the last question which is asking about the plasma drug conc. overtime while there is no elimination, is the drug gonna be in a high conc. in the plasma, because there is no elimination ? or it should be low because of the extravascular conc. is high?
@AhmedMostafa-kn7ii5 жыл бұрын
Very helpful !
@areosaf11 жыл бұрын
Stick with what you got its a good book
@lameckluwanda35063 жыл бұрын
You are good man! Can you help me with how to make a simple video like this?
@zeeshanmansuri371411 жыл бұрын
Brilliant..
@MikeyWahl016 жыл бұрын
10:31, I'm pretty sure that's 15,000, and not 150,000... No big deal! Excellent video!
@kanishkajayasooriya59703 жыл бұрын
15000 it is
@Ydaadsp11 жыл бұрын
What books do you recommend? I'm now studying Basic and Clinical Pharmacology, B. G. Katzung
@Daniel-rk2qz9 жыл бұрын
i love you. in every way.
@savitact79606 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot sir!
@Chelsea-gs7qj7 жыл бұрын
thank you so so much.
@missii14329 жыл бұрын
Areo, what program do u use to make these videos. i also teach pharm so i was curious to learn some of your experiences with prerecordings. i use doceri. what abt u?
@jbragg868 жыл бұрын
Question for you Areo. I understand the concept of APPARENT Vd b/c of low plasma concentrations of a drug. But how do we know that a drug that has a low plasma drug concentration is b/c of a HIGH Vd? What if the plasma concentration is just low because of metabolism & elimination? Thanks for helping to clarify this question. GREAT VIDEOS BTW, I USE THEM FOR MY NURSE ANESTHESIA CLASSES AND TEHY HELP SO MUCH!!!!!!!!!
@xDomglmao7 жыл бұрын
Very good question raised also by others - I would like to know also.
@aqilahishakhebat6 жыл бұрын
I think it's because he is using the IV route as an example, hence the first pass elimination is not taken into account because we assume that all of the drugs are absorbed directly into the systemic circulation. If you want to consider the metabolism and elimination factor, you have to include bioavailability in the equation, like in the second example he did.. I'm not sure if it's correct though..
@timkaseycharles4315 жыл бұрын
Hi Joe, To go into further detail there is a few Vd that you can talk about, Vd initial- i.e. prior to metabolism and redistribution into other compartments. This underestimates the Vd as there is still most of the drug in the bloodstream (i.e. blood samples taken at 1-3 min). Vd steady state relates to once the equilibrium with the major tissues is reached- this is the one most commonly used, this is samples taken at around 5-10 minutes (depending on the speed at which the drug redistributes out of the blood). The final Vd is the Vd elimination phase, which is once ALL the tissue compartments have reached equilibrium and the drug is only leaving the body by metabolism/excretion (and coming back into the blood from the tissues once the blood concentration is lower!). This greatly overestimates the Vd as the plasma concentration will be very low (and there will have been some metabolism and excretion in the time taken to reach this point). Keeping in mind, these Vd are referring to a 70kg fit and healthy male- to be able to apply them to another person they must first be divided by 70, then multiplied by the patients weight- other age / pathological features must be factored in such as: low plasma albumin in age and starvation, high body fat percentage in obesity, body water composition changes (decreasing TBW with age and dehydration), pregnancy and water/fat content changes.
@saleemaly376411 жыл бұрын
superb
@tiffanybusscher879911 жыл бұрын
I was wondering the same thing!
@timkaseycharles4315 жыл бұрын
Hi Areo, Very useful lecture! Would it be worthwhile noting the provided Vd for drugs are based on a 70kg male, and hence the dosage would also vary with patient weight? (and less so with gender and age). T
@reemelshazly354210 жыл бұрын
very useful
@Vsrika211 жыл бұрын
Thanks!!
@vudat1893 жыл бұрын
stay in plasma some book said it 5L is enough
@ameersaied8949 жыл бұрын
From Al-quds university? Thumb up
@Bindasjhakyass10 жыл бұрын
thanks
@Chris2749511 жыл бұрын
Well, no because the plasma concentration of that drug will be low since it will go to its site of action and therefore have a low plasma concentration... This means the Vd will be High since it has low affinity. But, if a drug has high affinity to plasma proteins, they are "trapped" in the plasma hence, their Vd will be low due to high concentrations of plasma. I.e. They are not distributed well through the body.
@danielavinueza51247 жыл бұрын
FREAKIN LOVE YOU
@rajendramishra77474 жыл бұрын
Sir make videos on pharmacodynamics 😌
@mrmhmd199111 жыл бұрын
thanks :)
@themasry50228 жыл бұрын
What is the meaning of drug plasma concentration? Free or albumin bound drug Or the total drug concentration in plasma
@kimphat188 жыл бұрын
+The Masry It means the total drug concentration in plasma (free drug in plasma and drug bound to plasma proteins)
@themasry50228 жыл бұрын
kimphat18 ok thanks alot
@xDomglmao7 жыл бұрын
So you take the bound fraction in consideration while measuring the drug concentration, even though the bound part won't have any effect?
@shallukhatri45928 жыл бұрын
Good one sir..helped me a lot :-) Just one doubt how low molecular weight drug has high Vd?
@georgeburchell8 жыл бұрын
+Shallu Khatri low molecular weight means the molecule will be relatively small, this increases its diffusion rate which would explain its high Vd. :)
@shallukhatri45928 жыл бұрын
George Burchell ohkay..got it now .. :-) Thanks :-)