Vought SBU Corsair; The ACTUAL Second One!

  Рет қаралды 11,623

Ed Nash's Military Matters

Ed Nash's Military Matters

6 күн бұрын

I suspect it's a case of false advertising...
Buy my book: amzn.to/3preYyO
Sources for this video can be found at the relevant article on:
militarymatters.online/
If you like this content please consider buying me a coffee or else supporting me at Patreon:
ko-fi.com/ednashmilitarymatters
/ ednash
The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement.

Пікірлер: 89
@BHuang92
@BHuang92 5 күн бұрын
If Vought have a nickel every time they kept naming every aircraft they built Corsair, they might still be around.......
@bigblue6917
@bigblue6917 5 күн бұрын
Well, at least enough to fit a cup holder in the cockpit.
@stephenrickstrew7237
@stephenrickstrew7237 5 күн бұрын
And anyone who has ever worked on the flight deck of Carrier probably has had nightmares about getting sucked into the Corsair’ 2’s intake .. I certainly did…
@bigblue6917
@bigblue6917 5 күн бұрын
I'd have thought dodging an incoming aircraft when things didn't go quite to plan during landing would have been higher. But then again you've probable got more experience of these things than most of us.
@jamesdalton2014
@jamesdalton2014 5 күн бұрын
Ed, if you're getting into recycled names and forgotten biplanes, perhaps you could do a video on the Curtiss Helldiver (the first one, that is). I've always thought it was an interesting aircraft, coming at a similar time as the SBU Corsair, right before the switch to monoplanes. Of course, I usually think of it under its British name, the Cleveland, so as not to confuse it with the later aircraft.
@bigblue6917
@bigblue6917 5 күн бұрын
I wouldn't mind seeing that one myself.
@justarandomf-4gphantom170
@justarandomf-4gphantom170 4 күн бұрын
Oh God the Autism got loose. Sorry man 😅
@UncleJoeLITE
@UncleJoeLITE 5 күн бұрын
From many angles, paint a Rising Sun on & I'd wonder if it was IJA. Just the design language somehow. _Btw, RAN kept & upgraded the [dual use] A4 Skyhawk until the late 80s. They were based at Albatross after Melbourne paid off, then NZ. The Corsair [IV] didn't fit our requirements, as it were._
@iffracem
@iffracem 5 күн бұрын
Weren't the Ozzie A4's sold to NZ, then leased back for a while? The Corsair (IV) as a Naval plane was redundant for Ozzie use, there was no requirement at all seeing we had no carrier after HMAS Melbourne. RAAF had their Mirages anyway.
@bigblue6917
@bigblue6917 5 күн бұрын
I've also noticed a few aircraft from this period where without the markings you'd be hard pushed to tell which navy it flew for.
@comentedonakeyboard
@comentedonakeyboard 5 күн бұрын
Taking a dive after the Navy droped the plane was a logical move.
@olivergs9840
@olivergs9840 5 күн бұрын
How is it you always manage to upload at the perfect time for me to watch new videos immediately? Love the content, and I'll continue to enjoy it
@bigblue6917
@bigblue6917 5 күн бұрын
While the rest of us.🤨
@johnladuke6475
@johnladuke6475 4 күн бұрын
I propose a nomenclature scheme for all these planes: Corsair, Also Corsair, Corsair Again, Still Corsair. Surely this will solve all confusion. Also, no matter how many times Ed says it, 1930s military aircraft evolution is always mind-blowing. Five years between this biplane with possible wooden skin, to Spitfires vs. BF-109s in combat.
@clintonrobinson8070
@clintonrobinson8070 5 күн бұрын
So much bs ai content coming out now. Good to still have content like this Ed.
@goddepersonno3782
@goddepersonno3782 4 күн бұрын
it is truly tragic what is happening to the internet glad we can still subscribe to stuff on youtube and follow creators who we have already vetted ourselves
@mikepette4422
@mikepette4422 5 күн бұрын
The name Corsair stands as a sign of quality.
@scootergeorge7089
@scootergeorge7089 5 күн бұрын
As opposed to "Pirate" and "Cutlass." Crusader was synonymous with "Gun Fighter." I worked on the A-7B as an AD-2 with the Lobos of VA-305. Good, solid aircraft. But the A-4 "Scooter" is cooler.
@spiritfoxmy6370
@spiritfoxmy6370 5 күн бұрын
As a kid, the A-7 was my absolute favorite plane ever. Can't wait for you to cover that.
@kurttate9446
@kurttate9446 4 күн бұрын
I’m pretty sure (but not absolutely sure) contrary to Ed the A7 was not a USMC aircraft.
@dakchang63
@dakchang63 Сағат бұрын
I worked A-7ds luv them in till you.need to change these eng seals razor blade city...
@robertgriffin662
@robertgriffin662 5 күн бұрын
The A-7 Corsair 2 was only used by USN,USAF. And a few foreign countries.
@EricCoop
@EricCoop 4 күн бұрын
You're right about the construction. Sometimes, aviation historians will write, "all-metal airframe," meaning the airframe is all metal but sometimes covered in fabric.
@EdNashsMilitaryMatters
@EdNashsMilitaryMatters 3 күн бұрын
Yeah, I've always referred to "all-metal" as just that, and call metal and fabric "mixed construction", especially on the fuselage. I'm probably wrong with that 😁
@9Apilot
@9Apilot 5 күн бұрын
The Marines never operated the A-7.
@Nightdare
@Nightdare 4 күн бұрын
Indeed, that was the F-8
@sugarnads
@sugarnads 4 күн бұрын
I went to the RTAF museum 2 days ago. Fantastic. Saw the only mk1 corsair left.
@colorpraeterita3824
@colorpraeterita3824 5 күн бұрын
I hope you do a general A-7 vid but if not then one specifically about the YA-7F prototypes would be awesome 👍
@lancerevell5979
@lancerevell5979 4 күн бұрын
Eventually we'll get a stealth Corsair. Gotta keep the tradition going! 😎👍
@EdNashsMilitaryMatters
@EdNashsMilitaryMatters 4 күн бұрын
NGAD? *fingers crossed*
@SoloRenegade
@SoloRenegade 5 күн бұрын
coincidentally, the F4U Corsair turned out to be an excellent dive bomber.
@gregorybiestek3431
@gregorybiestek3431 4 күн бұрын
In answer to your question at 4:45 of the video, I refer to the following information from Jane’s All the World’s Aircraft of 1938. Quote: “The Chance Vought V-142 Corsair is the identical export version of the SBU-2 ….. Fuselage - Welded steel structure with drop-forged fittings, covered forward from the nose to the cockpit and along the deck with metal panels and aft covered with fabric…. Wings - Wings structure is made of metal with fabric covering.“
@SoloRenegade
@SoloRenegade 5 күн бұрын
Corsair Corsair II Corsair Crusader Crusader II Crusader III Corsair II
@andrewpease3688
@andrewpease3688 5 күн бұрын
You’ve missed out a corsair
@SoloRenegade
@SoloRenegade 5 күн бұрын
@@andrewpease3688 oops, fixed
@franklester4011
@franklester4011 5 күн бұрын
I'd say we are due to add another.
@SoloRenegade
@SoloRenegade 4 күн бұрын
@@franklester4011 too bad Vought doesn't exist anymore.
@SoloRenegade
@SoloRenegade 4 күн бұрын
@@franklester4011 Perhaps something like a Northrop F-24 Corsair?
@gusframe2259
@gusframe2259 5 күн бұрын
What happened to the FU2 !?!?! .lol 😂
@migueldelacruz4799
@migueldelacruz4799 5 күн бұрын
Great video sir!
@johnhudghton3535
@johnhudghton3535 4 күн бұрын
Yes, very interesting Ed Thank you
@johndavey72
@johndavey72 5 күн бұрын
Thanks Ed.
@TheAmazingCowpig
@TheAmazingCowpig 5 күн бұрын
Guess they wanted a Corsair for every generation of engineers they had, haha. Can't blame them for reusing the name so much if they seemingly liked it that much.
@Eatherbreather
@Eatherbreather 5 күн бұрын
These Corsair biplanes look a lot like the Curtis's SOC-3 Seagull (to me they do anyway). Same designer possibly?
@starfish370
@starfish370 5 күн бұрын
Don't get the naca's in a twist.
@FAMUCHOLLY
@FAMUCHOLLY 5 күн бұрын
Thanks for the video.
@bigblue6917
@bigblue6917 5 күн бұрын
I love the 1930s aviation industry. Another day, another aircraft. Or three.
@michaelhowell2541
@michaelhowell2541 5 күн бұрын
Built the A-7 in Dallas in the late 60's.
@curtisbryce5096
@curtisbryce5096 5 күн бұрын
They sure liked that name.
@eddiemckee349
@eddiemckee349 4 күн бұрын
Does anyone know what. squadron that is on the aircraft at 5:15 and 7:27? That walking bird logo is a new one to me. Another great video Ed! I really enjoy these interim period types where the designers were trying out all kind of ideas. It was indeed a period when what is cutting edge one day is obsolete a year or two later......
@user-tu7yi5yw9x
@user-tu7yi5yw9x 4 күн бұрын
The Argentine ones were known as "Corsariazos" (big Corsairs)
@michaelmoorrees3585
@michaelmoorrees3585 5 күн бұрын
And the boxer George Foreman thought he was novel naming all his sons "George".
@andrewcoley6029
@andrewcoley6029 10 сағат бұрын
Great stuff.
@williammagoffin9324
@williammagoffin9324 5 күн бұрын
USMC never operated the A-7, they kept flying A-4s.
@paulbarthol8372
@paulbarthol8372 4 күн бұрын
George Foreman of aircraft naming.
@whyjnot420
@whyjnot420 5 күн бұрын
I imagine it was hard to say "...the first Corsair II." with a straight face.
@mathewkelly9968
@mathewkelly9968 5 күн бұрын
Vought and the Corsair , name a more iconic duo
@jims4539
@jims4539 5 күн бұрын
Did planes like the one described and other obsolete planes get used for coastal patrols in the US so new aircraft could go to front line use? Seems like at least on the east coast more could have been done against German U-boats.
@shawnmiller4781
@shawnmiller4781 5 күн бұрын
I want to say yes but don’t have a specific example I know that Bolingbrokes where used on the west coast for sub patrol into the later part of the gear
@dallesamllhals9161
@dallesamllhals9161 4 күн бұрын
Homelander + Sturmfront = Still best of Vought.
@petesheppard1709
@petesheppard1709 4 күн бұрын
Thanks! So the development of the A-7 from the F-8 was not the first time Vought built a bomber based on a fighter.
@EdNashsMilitaryMatters
@EdNashsMilitaryMatters 3 күн бұрын
Good point!
@anthrax2525
@anthrax2525 5 күн бұрын
Corsairs, corsairs, everywhere!
@johnladuke6475
@johnladuke6475 4 күн бұрын
But not a drop to drink.
@moss8448
@moss8448 4 күн бұрын
Thanks for turning me on to Rowland White he IS A HOOT.
@exharkhun5605
@exharkhun5605 5 күн бұрын
Calling everything Corsair is just the Navy trying to justify their existence by refusing to use the wonderfully elegant, intuitive and simple system developed by the army of calling everything M1, M3 or M4.
@voiceofraisin3778
@voiceofraisin3778 3 күн бұрын
Its a noble US Navy tradition. If you ever want a laugh check out Drach's video on the shenanigans the Navy used to have to use to crowbar cash out of the 19th century congress, basically Congress refused to pay for new ships but they would allow repairs to existing ships. Once a ship was judged to no longer be capable of use, ie even the rats wouldnt serve on it becasue it was so rotted and Congress was finally convinced it needed a refit the navy would drag it up in a drydock, strip it down to parts and reuse about three planks and the name plate. What went in as a rotten twelve gun sloop came out as a shiny twenty four gun frigate that was, in literal ship of theseus mode, the same same ship! Honest! Navy funding in the 20s was just as bad, theres probably a Navy planner still trying to explain how those biplanes have given good service, look how easy they are to modernise with the new monoplance conversion. Same name, Same plane though! Honest!
@janwitts2688
@janwitts2688 5 күн бұрын
XFU those were the days
@RemusKingOfRome
@RemusKingOfRome 5 күн бұрын
Did anyone think of placing the cockpit infront of the huge radial engines, to give pilots far better views ? (cylinders would extend out of the fusilage for cooling)
@EdNashsMilitaryMatters
@EdNashsMilitaryMatters 5 күн бұрын
There were a few, but this one was particularly frightening. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eNGmm5iS2qjThmQ.htmlsi=txtHzaB0bUhYi20z
@RemusKingOfRome
@RemusKingOfRome 5 күн бұрын
@@EdNashsMilitaryMatters LOL! ok that was scary, but I meant prop infront of the cockpit (at the front) but large radial behind cockpit, linked via a shaft (like the AirCobra)
@iffracem
@iffracem 5 күн бұрын
@@RemusKingOfRome They probably did think of it, but then preferred water cooled inline, as there's be less engine "poking out" into the airstream. After all, the water cooled engines a re designed to be totally covered by fuselage and cowlings. Whereas, except for very few, radials are air-cooled and the cylinders require a lot of exposure to said air.
@ejomatic7480
@ejomatic7480 5 күн бұрын
There was a mid engine radial experimented with in Italy but it had overheating problems
@lancerevell5979
@lancerevell5979 4 күн бұрын
The Japanese J7W Shinden had a mid-mounted radial, but a pusher prop. It would have made an interesting jet conversion.
@steveshoemaker6347
@steveshoemaker6347 4 күн бұрын
Charlemagne's Elephant 🇺🇸
@frjonathanhill9817
@frjonathanhill9817 5 күн бұрын
I'm getting confused by all these Corsairs:)
@peaceraybob
@peaceraybob 4 күн бұрын
If Vought had a nickel for every time the Navy changed their specifications AFTER the aircraft had already been designed and built, they might still be around...
@malcolmgibson6288
@malcolmgibson6288 5 күн бұрын
Fabric cover over a metal frame is still all metal construction the covering material makes no difference.
@nigelsmith7366
@nigelsmith7366 4 күн бұрын
You are very good at contradicting yourself 🤣🤣 unless there is a new type of flexible metal fabric
@malcolmgibson6288
@malcolmgibson6288 4 күн бұрын
@nigelsmith7366 The all metal construction refers to the load bearing structure of the aircraft ie there is no wood.
@IvorMektin1701
@IvorMektin1701 5 күн бұрын
The NACA is pronounced En A Sea A. Not like NASA.
@erikwellerweller8623
@erikwellerweller8623 5 күн бұрын
not by me or anybody else who uses the term which I have heard hundreds of times in my life.
@joshuabessire9169
@joshuabessire9169 5 күн бұрын
Is the M1 pronounced Garand or Garand? I've also heard it pronounced Carbine, Thompson, Abrams, Combat Car, and Motorway.
@IvorMektin1701
@IvorMektin1701 5 күн бұрын
@@erikwellerweller8623 My dad worked for the NACA and later NASA, a 39 year career.
@nigelsmith7366
@nigelsmith7366 4 күн бұрын
You are so wrong lol
@IvorMektin1701
@IvorMektin1701 4 күн бұрын
@@nigelsmith7366 No I'm not
@mombaassa
@mombaassa 5 күн бұрын
1st
@drstevenrey
@drstevenrey 5 сағат бұрын
Do they really not come up with another name. Seriously lame.
Bristol Bulldog - The 'Pilots Dream Fighter'
26:56
Rex's Hangar
Рет қаралды 62 М.
F4U-5 Corsair Superprop!
39:04
Greg's Airplanes and Automobiles
Рет қаралды 153 М.
Вечный ДВИГАТЕЛЬ!⚙️ #shorts
00:27
Гараж 54
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
Неприятная Встреча На Мосту - Полярная звезда #shorts
00:59
Полярная звезда - Kuzey Yıldızı
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
ОСКАР ИСПОРТИЛ ДЖОНИ ЖИЗНЬ 😢 @lenta_com
01:01
Cruiser and Destroyer Actions of WW2 - Small but Vicious
33:21
Drachinifel
Рет қаралды 106 М.
The Vought Corsair; Forgotten Original
16:11
Ed Nash's Military Matters
Рет қаралды 22 М.
World's Most Valuable SS Helmet Found?
14:13
Mark Felton Productions
Рет қаралды 554 М.
The Vought V80; A Poop Fighter
9:30
Ed Nash's Military Matters
Рет қаралды 14 М.
Cold War Motoring: The Communist Cars of the Soviet Union
22:06
Ed's Auto Reviews
Рет қаралды 299 М.
Why Five Stroke Engines Are More Efficient But Still a Failure
18:18
driving 4 answers
Рет қаралды 492 М.
This Is Why You Can’t Go To Antarctica
29:30
Joe Scott
Рет қаралды 2,3 МЛН
D-Day Tanks: Operation Overlord's Strangest Tanks
31:18
The Tank Museum
Рет қаралды 511 М.
What on Earth is a Motorjet?
10:33
Flight Dojo
Рет қаралды 268 М.
Хотела заскамить на Айфон!😱📱(@gertieinar)
0:21
Взрывная История
Рет қаралды 4,4 МЛН