666

好吃 🥰

777

Lekor Bite 大家买起来

送货真快！收到你和嘉雯的亲笔签名祝福了 多谢

别忘了，马华也在爪夷文事件操弄华人种族情绪哦。我们华人也必须提防政客煽动我们

别呀 这样的课题一出来 华人塔利班种族主义者就不安分啦 他们觉得没自已没有贪污的到的问题呀 虽然他们中saman还是用duit kopi解决嘻嘻嘻

@@ddma3295 总看不清楚自己和现实，只会看到别方的问题然后肆意地控诉，自己做那些事时却装傻，不是鸵鸟是什么？这种双标的假人真的不少，加上一些民族情绪更加恶心

影片不只是好那么简单，是好厉害。不止点出我们大马普遍选民的对新闻真伪态度、更教会了我们如何以理反驳，是个远比辱骂好太多的方案。

政客负能量满满，多么希望他们能交出一切去别的地方称王称霸但实则却像被骗去柬埔寨的人有去无回 去柬埔寨算是筛掉一些有贪念的人

I am not from Malaysia. Your lengthy argument or statement devotes more than 90 percent of the coverage to defending that the article/paper is outstanding and so on. But the host of this video did NOT say anything to denigrate the value of the article/paper. On the contrary he highly praised the article/paper and direct people's attention to how the 伊党 was abusing the article/paper. Yet, you hid that into only one short clause "是伊党没有了解什么是计量经济学分析，就断章取义", which got buried in the sea of more than 90% of your statements. Why is that? Are you hoping that the reader/audience would not find that short clause? Or, else??? Aren't you barking up on the wrong tree?

@@lexneuron But the comments below doesn't agree with that, they questioned the motive of making this article. They also criticized the paper for not calculate the percentage of bride receiver.

@@KL-uf4we , Yes, lots comments direct the attention to the motive and construct of that paper/article. But the host of this video did not place overbearingly too much emphasis on that. As to why there is no mentioning or even statistics on the percentage of bribe receivers, I have my own speculation on that, which I am not prepared to share with the general public as yet, lest I might get sued in the court. 【One thing I could point out though is that I have my anecdotal experience on multiple instances, based on which one could easily deduct and calculate the percentage of each kind of bribe recipients (i.e, the ones accepting grafts). That is why I chose not to share my own speculation on that matter in public.】 The main point of my comment to the comment by richard teng is that he focused mainly on (more than 90% of his statement) on defending the integrity and so on of the paper/article, while burying one short clause of "是伊党没有了解什么是计量经济学分析，就断章取义" in his lengthy statement/argument, as if he was determined to keep audience/readers from noticing that very fact (that it was 伊党 that was abusing the research paper and twisted the findings to suit their agenda -- relating bribery/corruption matter to racial groups), which is just too "odd," to put it most courteously. 【One could ponder on one of the several possibilities -- were the authors or one of the authors of that paper/article under some sort of coercion or something of similar to the same effect that they have chosen not to include the calculation of statistics on all kinds of bribe recipients in their paper? (P.S. forget about the possibility of their academic incompetency, for any professor or researcher would not have overlooked that aspect of the entire matter! For any bribery to take place there MUST be the giver and the recipient. Any research on "murder" would be a joke if it considers only the one that commits the murder, without also consider the victims of the murder. 】

都講google scholar就找到，就看你會不會用google.

劝大家多读点书，免得受政客的骗

@@user-mn5eq9kx2e 多听一些理性的人说话还是比较好的，毕竟听君一席话，胜读十年书。当然，读书也很重要，但是听多了各种见解才能放下偏见，不然以前孤陋寡闻，偏听偏信的坏习惯很难改过来

@creamy 多读书，没叫你只读一本书，只要有持续关注实时新闻和三观没很歪的话其实不需要担心这点，一个信息不要只看一本书，也从网站或者youtube还是新闻渠道去深入了解，这才是他想表达的意思

​@creamy 心知肚明就好。只要达到效果且不会引起不必要的争端，甚至是麻烦。 这是智慧型的评论，有水准

@creamy 确实，读历史书也是多读点书，而我们都知道现今大马教育有些科目就只是政客为愚民量身定制的

然而很多人根本没有达到这个层次的思考，可以参考评论区

@@ee3171 所以才需要盧卡斯這樣引導觀眾如何理性和利用數據去思考

@@sweekeetan6421 问题就在于这篇视频的引导，依旧改变不了大部分人的非理性思考

@@ee3171 當然，這個也是時間上的問題。畢竟我們都已經習慣當前的環境。短時間內是不可能做出任何改變的。初步行動還是扮演重要的角色😂😂

说的对

固打制所造成

华人专贿，马来人受贿，两者皆有罪

82%受贿 的是 穆斯林， 非穆斯林為了生存才行贿， 因為國陣政府幾十年都要給錢才給你方便，合約， 不然就處處為難你逼你給錢

刚看时也在想：行贿固然有罪，但受贿却是罪加一等吧？

周杰伦表示：med'uh g'n lvkusi xiao'in wo ba nee xiehj'n woduh gur lee diss nee 词：方文山

我不落泪~ 情绪零碎~ 2022 周董新专辑依然好听 ❤

网路上看到事件的都是片面的，有些或许是分享自己不好的经历，有些则是别有心的散播。总的来说，大部份人都不会特别去针对谁，只有少部份团体会有这样的偏见，一个人只要正常不乱来，没有人会介意他是那里出生吧？如果有，那个介意的人才是个怪人吧

@@user-dy4rh5vz4w 你是认真的吗

史俑作者是那个族人？

@兼明 语言从来不是问题，我们华人文化也很好，特别是道德教育，儒家思想，但是社会价值观已经发生变化，那么是不是也要普及一下，免得学校教的是一套，社会实践的却是弱肉强食，你讹我诈。现在的人为什么特别喜欢找快钱，无非缺乏自信，缺乏认同等观念，社会好像容不下这些人一般，大部份人都是被推着走，幸运的找到理想成就事业，不幸的浑浑噩噩躺平过日子，想钱想疯了就捞偏出国跳飞机，为什么就没有老老实实做人的，老实打工的就要被压榨。教育很重要，不分种族，最重要是让孩子有自信，而不是分什么种族的，语言只是媒介，从语言中找到的价值才是现在孩子需要的，不是简单的禁止就能达到的，大人也需要和小孩一起成长，社会才能改变

无可否认这篇研究存在一定的survivorship bias，可是已现有可取data来分析，加上算严谨的method，还在有名的杂志发表，不可以说是不可靠，只能说缺陷是多的，改进的地方还有。

但是数据可以表明，官职越大，贿赂涉及的金额就越大

要付钱的

@@rewer 电脑版和手机网页版的KZfaq可以。

还好看到这留言 原来是那个意思 🤣 abang 有没有好介绍

@@chookoya 哈哈我也沒有cable

還有那些外國車牌的..

你的数据又是哪里来的呢？😂

@@ddma3295 刻板印象 至于那些尽责的警察 不我看不见 假的怎么可能警察会清廉

@@ddma3295 親身體會

@@ddma3295 source: trust me bro

I have tried to find the option of auto-translate but it looks like this function is not available for all video. I don't know that is it caused by the difference of device or something else.

Yes : Pekali - is coeficient

@@stay2435 Translation is set by video owner, it can be disabled by option.

@@NK_Khoo-Malaysian Oh, thanks for your explanation

一个点不是10% significance level吗，根据p-value来讲for malay的假设出错率小于1%

也有是马来版的koefisien，lucas也没有错

@@dchoo1207 明白，少做了点功课

@@jingtong 哦没事，大家互相学习。也谢谢你的分享

it can allow auto translation for people who want subs in other language.

因为学术界没办法拿政府的资料了查

可信度跟国家有关系吗？？ ，可信不可信根据的是样本数量，统计方法，这片论文也有提到了局限性，算很好的论文了。还有你认为那个国家的学术可信度高？

只要有用到正确的方法，学术不论国籍，只是准确度的差异而已，任何数据都只是参考，实际都会有落差，而一个参考用的数据能证明什么？如果对比后面的数据，只能说曝光的贪污事件越来越多，我国需要更有效的监督和执法，更有效的举报管道，更透明的工程招标和各种政府收费，更好的人民教育和素质

i think you should just write entirely in english, it's hard for people who want to translate

I can help in malay subtitles, of course with payment. 😁

很明显证明伊党不过是标题党，不然就是他们的英语不好🙂

巫统也就只能贬低他族来抬高自己

@@user-hv6pk8do9y Hadi Awang是伊斯蘭黨啦XD 雖然巫統也是abang adik

@@Meowie-OvO 誒靠背，我把這兩個當搞混了www

盧卡斯自己本身就會馬來話不是嗎？

@@AZ-zk6fr 会和会翻译是不一样的层次哦

警察黑你什么罪名？

什么事被逮到？

去JB驾错lane进到去singapore lorry的关卡，他们escort出去一直说要开saman

@@garylee6545 虽然但是 车驾在lorry lane确实违反了交通规则 是真的会被saman的😂

@@0610gemining 我没拒绝saman啊，一直叫他们开，可是拖了15-20分钟都不开，一直和我解释开了后我很麻烦要去还什么的😅

雖然我是台灣人，但因為常常看盧卡斯的節目，所以我第一個想法也跟你一樣