so true

Agreed

Not true

Same

Bro you watched a 29 minute video in one minute of it being uploaded? LMAO Bullshit

Blade gets +1.75 agi from lvl, not +1

DragKnight

Hold down ctrl + and git a number key to assign what you have to that. You can select your heros with F1 F2 F3. Personally, I just group my damage dealing hero to 1, my tank hero to 2, and my healer and army to group 3. He likes to have his buildings grouped to 4, but I think geiup 5 is best for the buildings and leave 4 for special units like siege or air or If I have a really big army. Grubby likes to have his army grouped in with a hero or two in 1, but that doesn't work for me. I hear Happy assigns single units to single controll groups so he can micro everything individually using with both hands at once. I like to controll my whole army as one or two groups and select things individually or as groups with the mouse as needed for finer control. Experiment. Do whatever works for you. Watch Grubby's tutorials. As for what hotkeys he hits... Grubby has shown his keyboard use before. You can find it if you search his old videos. It's beat, but not really that helpful for learning micro because of his old layout. Grubby has huge hands and uses default hotkeys from back in the day. You do not want to bother with trying trying to use the horribly and illogical arranged default key layout which was arranged alphabetically, not with use and quality of life in mind. You should use *Grid Keys* layout setting which is way easier to learn, more efficient, more intuitive than the poorly designed default hotkeys. *Gris keys is an easy to find setting now in the game menue.* Just set your keys to grid and don't even bother with trying to do it the old fashioned way Grubby does. With Grid Keys your attack, stop, hold and patrol commands will be grouped together right underneath your controller geoups, and your spells keys will be close below. Your building keys will be grouped together and corospond to the war they're arranged on the screen. Grid vs default is the difference between only having to learn one simple set of less than a dozen closely grouped keys for all the buildings, units, heros, and spells in the game, vs memorizing dozens of different keys scattered all around the keyboard with no useful pattern. Trust me, you do not want to do that. It's the difference between learning just 3 adjacent spell keys for all the casters and heros in the hame vs 3 different and scattered spell keys for each and every different hero and caster. Even back in the day a lot of people modified their hotkeys, but now that Grid keys is a setting in the game menue nobody bothers to learn over a hyndered keys spread all across the entire keyword instead of just a handful of keys grouped in the left hand third.

That’s a awesome reply but I hope 🤞 I can get one from the grubstwr himself 🙏🤘👑

​@@horsemumbler1 is was hella great reply, gj.

orcs. On all levels i bet

Don't worry, the rest of the series is coming tomorrow ;)

Agreed

Maiev goes commando

Did you watch the games at all, or just waste your time on commenting videos that you pause at 0:01? If you get creepjacked so hard, it does not matter what races you and your opponent play, it's gg. Add to this that you play against one of the best players in the World, of course he will utilize that. If Lyn was smarter/luckier and did creepjack Happy same way, it would be ez win for Lyn. Would you write such comment about how Orcs are unbalanced after that? I doubt, cuz you being biased adds to your ignorance.

And not speaking that undead so nerfed to the ground that only Happy left among top players. He buys circlet, cuz he knows how 1 BM can destroy the whole 5000 gold undead army, wich Lyn demonstrated later in this match.

​@@Sindamsc I watched the entirety of these 2 games not the whole series, yet. I watch a lot of wc3 for many years. I hear you man, although what sticks out to me is things like this: - "getting creep jacked SO hard" (to me this highlights the sheer amount the undead must "throw" to make the game competitive/even) - "if lyn was LUCKIER" (...this is an issue) - UD nerfed to the ground (imo... there may be "nerfs," but again, i question how truly practical they are. UD imbalance is hard to address imo without essentially a "page one re-write" of the race...) - im not biased against undeads lol like they didnt destroy my family. its purely observational. and im speaking from years, not this single game my boy. plz dont take personal offense - given a one-sided orc victory... i would NOT write such comments about how orcs are unbalanced, YOU ARE RIGHT - but not because of "IgNoRaNcE" ... but because there is counterplay against them. all of their choices have give/take that allow the opposing player some avenue of compensation... this is exactly my point about UD BaLaNcE... try to understand that - one sided victories happen and are fine. i believe an orc win would be FAR MORE due to skill, and NOT inherent GAPS in balance + ability to counterplay + LACK of strategic compensation my questions would be what is the counter play vs undead who is winning trades so one-sidedly, at most stages of the game, given 'equal' micro ? what is the counter play vs undead? given that the undead opts for A, B, C (like given a strategic choice, what/where is the exposed weakness from choosing A, B, C -> and therefore being (temporarily) "weaker" at X, Y, Z -> "where is the counter play" i didnt mean to personally upset you so as to elicit ad hominem, just discussion haha. i tried to address some of your points of course one can say "you beat undead by outplaying them" ...sure... but to what degree? this is the issue. you ever have a game where you consistently outplay the opponent but you are barely even with them, or possibly even BEHIND? the DEGREE that one must outplay the undead is ASTOUNDING to me cOiL nOvA tOo StRoNg (and much more)

@@jacobg892 if you played the game 1/100 of the time you spent time writing essays on internet you would understand a bit more about the balance. Happy was ALWAYS famous for his micro skills, even when undead were close to unplayable at pro level (for about 10 years), he was always in top 16 of the world, mostly the only undead there with few expectations. So your "equal micro" is just stupid, Happy and Moon at his peak got the best micro in the history of the game, and many pro players said that, including Grubby. Happy's weakest point was strategy variable, partly bc most of undead units were badly balanced and mostly useless at pro level for 10 years, wyrms, banshee, necromancer, meatwagons, even ghouls. When he improved that aspect of the game, he became the best or one of the best at very least. If your opinion is not biased and comes completely from observation, how come most eu finals are not Undead vs Undead, but Happy against players of other races? How come there are only 2 world class undead players on the Globe and like at very least 5+ orcs? You wanna go against statistics or what?

Sweet was quite dominant as well.

There was also 4K.Fury long ago and after him FoV. MaDFroG had the best micro that time. Besides, there was MYM]Susiria, who was a skilled ghoul player. But Happy surpassed them all

@@TheAmnMer Ofc, they retired long and wc3 "reputation" was tarnished since 2005's MBC Map Scandal.

My worm seems huge, too bad its just seems…