As you wish!

I offer this comment to the algorithm. All praise the algorithm! Also...thanks for the video!

Why cant warhammer 40k be like this?

Woah. Best showcase of the game I've seen so far. How are you getting these amazing angles?

I think you might have meant the empire of man instead of the imperium of man

W

Thank you for his service

May his bravery and courage forever be immortalized in a video game!

When the fuck rat doing revolution?

Ww1 Germany vs France

@@TB.167ww1 German imperial vs rattouille rats

WW1 rats won on both sides of the trenches

"Despite this victory, however, the human soon realize the horror they are facing as the army they were just facing was merely a bait" Reference to how many skaven players uses bait armies of lower tier troops to soften and waste the enemy ammunition which might also be canon by the virtue of always bringing meatshields. This is assuming that the skaven advances at the same rate as, if not faster than, the imperium. Making doomwheel, jezzail, and ratling gun the same tier as clanrats and skavenslaves was while also being more common. Furthermore, every middle ranking clanrats now has access to warplock pistols.

You should write a full story about this scenario

@@noahmasi9368 You know what maybe I will

@@HistoricalWaifus Send me a link when you do!

This isn't Warhammer fantasy right? Hence the WW1 uniform of the Imperial units?

Thanks friend

KZfaq algorithm :) it might not like it, but we LOVE the content!

Yeah they really are

@@WarAndHistory. there's a fan fiction on KZfaq AFanWithTooMuchTime is currently doing, STAR WARS VS WARHAMMER 40K you think you could bring those battles to life?

E

Thank you for such an awesome mod. I was speechless while working on it, soo much detail, the tanks are amazing. I added a little FX change to the machine gun trail and it looks soo good. thank you again.

Doubt it, even though WW1 was very linear compared to later wars, it's no where near linear enough to be replicated in a total war style

​@Pos3id0n it would literally just be clicking attack move and watching lines of guys be gunned down by machine guns. Trench warfare is not about strategy or manoeuvre, its just purely about numbers and willpower to suffer casualties

Try Napoleon Total War's Great War mod.

Total war 40k ain't gonna happen get over it bud 🤡🤡

@@Pos3id0n. great war western front game is like total war

Pyrrhic? More like another day at the office for the guard!

And there's that one probably traumatized officer standing about all the bodies of his previous unit xd

Any Imperium victory looks pretty much like a defeat.

@@Aldarinn Thats why its called a pyrrhic victory

E

Actually if he would have used "traditional techniques" he might have saved his infantry, which got whipped out leading a charge with the tanks hanging back doing little. Artillery first, (since theres no air power for him to use) then tanks with infantry protecting them. No need to just send your infantry without protection all alone into the hordes, lost cause. Tactically it gets a D. Makes for a great video though.

@@MrSneaksful that is very true! 🤔if they used more modern tactics they could have saved more of their soldiers. Overall they unnecessarily lost many of their troops doing infantry charge then if they sent the tanks in with infantry following. Plus the tanks would have done better if they were moving more to make it harder to hit them.

@@MrSneaksful I agree. That was some kind of ancient hand to hand combat tactics. Modern/WW1 would have dug defensive positions, not built defensive positions that can be blown up and provide no protection from shrapnel. If the infantry could have been sent out, but only to fix the position of the enemy for the artillery to kill. Why did the enemy attack head on when they could have flanked those defenses? Whichever side used it's artillery would have won without taking much loss. If both, it would have been an artillery battle.

E

E

E

Roger

E

No. It's literally just a reskin. No cover system, no urban battles, no squad control, small scale, etc. I could go on. Current TW is not capable of simulating 40k.

@@marcusweathers3070 it doesn’t have to simulate 40K, warhammer 40K epic is easily achievable within the total war ballpark

@@rileyfreedman And only a complete mouth breather would want 40k Epic. It would literally just be the same game we have now, just with more guns.

Yea, i see. Scavenburger good name.

Hahaha seriously... "THEYRE WAVERING!!!" meanwhile, your entire forward element is being obliterated

... Yes, yes

The imperium skaven wars of attrition would go on forever.

"Ratlings (Homo sapiens minimus) are small, loud, hungry and lecherous Abhumans who often serve as snipers in the Astra Militarum, a role at which they excel. Ratlings also serve as cooks for Astra Militarum regiments, a skill they no doubt learned in order to feed their own seemingly bottomless stomachs; and they also have kleptomaniac tendencies, as commissars report petty theft and illegal gambling rings increase substantially when Ratlings are attached to a platoon, company or regiment. One named Ratling homeworld is Ornsworld, which was attacked by Abaddon the Despoiler during the Gothic War. Ratlings are a mutant sub-branch of the Human race, like the Ogryns, who adapted to living in underground tunnel systems on worlds with hostile surface environments. Due to their small size, they often bear the brunt of normal Human soldiers' jokes, although more than one soldier has been saved by the Ratlings' superior marksmanship. Essentially, Ratlings are the Warhammer 40,000 equivalent of Warhammer's Halflings." -40kWiki

They go by a designation, not a name, and they're confined to a single planet, but ratmen do exist in 40k. Their planet is quarantined because something there devolves the intelligence of those that stay too long, which is why the ratmen are there, was once a spacefaring race the planet didn't let go.

@@MTLRNN space hobbits

I hope they also give bretonnia a ww1 type makeover with a french ww1 theme. Perhaps to make them still different form the empire they can be early ww1 inspired with bright red and blue uniforms, and the later units would be the blue helmet troops from later on.

Ahm...so...I don't know how I should break this to you but we (the Central Powers) lost the first world war partially due to Germany's aggressiveness and shortsightedness (attacking Belgium, sinking an American transport). And Prussia's rise to power a fluke of fate (see Miracle of the House of Brandenburg).

@@chrismath149 I agree attacking belgium was a mistake, but the sinking of american vessels was justified. I say this as an american myself. The ships were caught numerous times carrying weapons and they were supporting the british war effort. You can't smuggle weapons and brazenly give support in a war then cry when your ships start getting blown up. As for the rise to power being a fluke, numerous wars prove this to be false. The german people won multiple wars and were quite close to winning ww1. The beat the french not long before and proved they were the strongest land army in the war time and time again. They definitely had a lot of problems and made a lot of mistakes, but they were not the fools or weaklings you make them out to be. They had to be dogpiled and embargoed to beat.

@@resentfuldragon The damage of American weapon shipmeants was preferable to us than an American entry into world war 1. The inability to protect your homefront and starting a war that relies on the homefront is a foolishness in itself. Furthermore, there is an issue with what people generally remember and what is history.* (see at the end of my responce; it is not terribly important to give an example). When you study German as well as Prussian performance you see that a lot of times a victory was gained not due to excellence but superiority compared to the enemy (what I mean is that a Prussian advance or victory succeeded despite several flaws because the enemy was acting even more flawed which does not support the narrative of an excellent German/Prussian Army.) To provide specific examples I would have to dig out those facts and sadly I lack the time. Anyway, good enough does not equal good. I might still be biased here because I have not yet put much effort in studying other wars to this detail but to me it seems that Germany didn't really do that good of a job during the Franco-Prussian war (particularly logistically). I still have to give credit: Developing talents, using a General Staff as it is meant and training NCOs are good ideas. Regarding world war 1, the German Army did a lot of things well but proved to be quite stuck in its ways (see how they regarded tanks during world war 1). But a bigger issue was arrogance. The start of world war 1 (or rather) the refusal to end the war on somewhat favourable terms which would be survival (as Austria-Hungary had preferred in 1917 - see Sixtus Affair en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixtus_Affair ) proves that Germany was too arrogant to foresee the danger the war presented to Germany and its hegemony. World War 1 sent four empires into the grave and would cause a lot of damage futher on. You might say Germany could not have foreseen the consequences but when has a lost war ever lead to good blood between peoples? FYI: *To name another example: Austria won (around) 66 wars, lost 37 and 16 were inconclusive, but today it has the reputation of a third rate military power mainly due to world war 1. Winning around 2/3s of the military campaigns you are involved in, isn't terribly bad imho. Austria also did a good job on the italian front but was defeated due to failures on the Eastern Front that were unrecoverable and the situation on the homefront. Again: Nowadays history is simplified again. I am sure I have my own blind spots where I over- or underestimate some nations military strength.

@@chrismath149 How the fuck is it an army's quality at fault if that army managed to overcome logistical problems and had a competent general staff that allowed them to outnumber the enemy in their own home territory? One of the most notable greatness of the Prussian Army in the late 19th century was the ability to quickly mobilize against the enemy through railways which allowed them to rapidly advance against them in numbers. If you complain about Prussia only winning against opponents they outnumbered then you obviously haven't read about the 7 Year's War or Tannenberg but in the end, no army specifically only ever focused on quality, they needed numbers as well in the battlefield to ensure victory (at least this was the case until the existence of automatic weapons which now allow a few soldiers to hold off against a larger enemy force attacking them)

It's a Warpspider

It wouldn't. It's not just about aesthetics.

The battle map and unit controls will be vastly different. Battle map will probably be like starcraft or ground control or starship troopers.

Thanks for the sub!

@@WarAndHistory. you earned it sir. Great channel.

With treads that appear to have been welded in place

the rats of course

mistake i think 🤦‍♂️

Does Bretonnia survive till 1900?

@- MR GLADIUS - Yeah, sure, it's Britan, after all.