Indeed! It contrasted the rash youth with the inveterate patrician, the latter being so steeped in opulence and high society that they can’t even be bothered to remember dates 😊.

@@crypastesomemore8348 Nah, I'm a factory worker and I forget what day it is all the time.

Gambling superstitious nonsense huwoman

It showed his nerves had gone haywire

BC

Before Clyde!

what would happen to you in a downtown bar if you tell to the other players (3 a.m.): no problem, dude, let me write you a check

Now THAT'S FUKKING FUNNY!!

Not really. .no breasts.

He would have made a superb baddy in a Bond movie.

Soames Forsyte…

dead

That guy Dominion was a Napoleon wannabe, he was obsesed with the French Emperor.

Lmfaorofl

I don't always comb my hair but when I do, I use toilet water...lol

Oh shut up! The HUBRIS of people such as you is vomit-inducing! You’ve watched EVERY poker movie" and you’re so SUPERIOR you really think that?? Good gawd--you MUST be the most boring person ever! Like Cliff in “Cheers” you are insufferable! Just watch the movie!

No, the writers.

jesse lee: and this is coming from a degenerate gambler expert???

Helen Eschenbacher 🙄

Jesse Lee Haha! You’re just a baby! Waaaah!

Nope, you can tell by the way he mangled that jack that he was going to make good on the cheque.

Beatty always full of himself

yeah lol best part of this show. sounds like a warm sunny day

Notice how he runs out to cancel the cheque?

Everything you do at the poker table gives away information!

I think he is terrible .. he didnt muck the folded hands also the whole thing of someone searching in their pants to cover a bet is ridic .. also beatty raising to something the other player cant cover is dumb he has him covered already .. its just not how poker is played

@@silverkitty2503 it depends what's agreed upon. games which are not table stakes are really rare these days but i think the further back in time you go the more you encounter them.

Which makes no sense since the game was to be "Table Stakes"; meaning, that only the chips on the table are in play. They could not bring in extraneous money- like Mr. Dimitrios tried to do to 007 in Casino Royale.

@@PopDisplay1 Had to watch "part 1" to see if you're correct, and it turns out you're wrong. The game was NOT Table Stakes. It was a cash game with any money allowed.

every poker movie made before the 90s involved the chequebook.

I don’t understand how a guy writes a check for an amount for more than the other stack and the guy has to bring out a check to call. Makes no sense, u play till u out of chips. Rebuy after a hand. Not only is it no limit stud, it’s no max buy in and u can add to ur stack during the hand.

@@chevy4x466 As long as you learned never to play outside the walls of a casino, you've learned a valuable lesson.

He might look slimy, but Eric Porter could act most people off the stage and especially Warren Beatty.

Gump McGrath you mean Mr. Widows peak

I'd like to have seen him flip over a card with two Kings printed on it is the other guy had the case ten.

It’s the hair- his hair is horrible, giving off sinister, dark vibes. Beatty, on the other hand, has perfect hair. Hair makes the man. Baldness is a curse. Just sayin’.

in the context of the film there is a real expectation that Beatty might lose because up until this point in the movie he has been cheating at cards using special glasses and marked decks which he devised by breaking into a printing factory that printed playing cards for major casinos around Europe and England, and marking the printing plates and so in all his previous games he is winning easily because he knows what his opponents have, but in the final game the porter brings up some old dusty playing cards from the basement stock that have not been recently printed and so they are not marked and Beatty finds that he has to play the game for real without cheating...up until this point in the movie we never see him lose but he has been cheating in every single game...so will he actually be able to win without cheating is the question......ah I guess you need to watch the film from start to finish to get the tone of it.

I deal poker at a big casino. It gets like that.

With a hand that can easily be beat pls

Word

At that lofty level of high society, your integrity in honoring your debts must be without question. Renege on any marker in any game of chance, & you'll not only be barred from gambling everywhere, but no one will transact business with you, of any kind. Essentially, you'll be ostracized in the business world, & blacklisted from elite social engagements hereafter, as good as dead to that level of society. Nobody commits social suicide over a handful of cards, unless they're genuinely off their rocker, & that's a whole different barrel of monkeys.

Lolololololol

I wonder what the Rake was for this monster hand!

@@toptenguy1 The last 2 bets totaled 500,000 pounds.

cincinnati kid?

One of the worst poker scenes ever, incorrect betting, multiple string bets which are illegal in ANY game, no table stakes, etc. etc.

@@markw3598 String betting didn't become widespread "illegal" until the 1990s. Prior to that, it was everywhere (even in the casinos).

its called high stakes poker .. however normally you play the money you are bought in , pulling out a checkbook and adding money on the table is quite unordinary at least today .. and if this was a real game with real better one of the players would have already smash a bottle on that chinese dealer for making those sounds

@@TheBarbahaba the dealer stole the show in that scene. Wears the sunglasses 😎, he peels them off in a big moment. Does the stare down. The cherry 🍒 on top was when that fucker laughed as the dude got cleaned out on a hand he dealt 😂😂😂😂

@@chevy4x466 like i said , in real life he would have got a bottle smashed on his forehead .. lol

True poker fan right here

I'm just stoned, to be honest.

@@FirstNameLastName-bu3hi - Marijuana: WEED with ROOTS in HELL

why not both!

Eric Porter Fan actually

Strange comment

AgainName of movie is unknowm

@@pomingkoo7040 Rounders

Poranee Boonlue kaleidoscope movie full

the other guy beside him had king and 3, super low odds for a third king on warren beaty

Yeah, this 100%. Silly mergy mergy bet. He should polarize to air or T here. Either quads or bluff makes sense for slim guy.

Lincoln doesn't have to have a full her. He could just have an ace or a queen in the hole and believe it is good - wich is mostly the case in 5-Card-Stud. In fact a full house is very unlikely, as a king as well as a three are already gone. But this makes the last bet even more stupid, because Lincoln will in the most times never call, knowing that he is beaten. When he calls, villain loses half the time. Even if villain had quads here, he should never bet but check to maybe induce a bluff.

@@karlhollerung8198 never bet with TTTTJ? no way. easy value bet!

People who lack experience, why did he raise so much is probably more important.

I call, let out a sigh, and another 2,000.

There was no such thing in those games

Bluff? What bluff are you talking about? The rich man had a full house. That's a very good hand, and is super rare to get. Warren's character just had a better hand; in fact, the only possible hand that could beat his was quad 10s. Both players would have gone all in had this been a real hand (you can't just pull out a checkbook irl) and it would have been just down to luck.

@@jyashin the bluff was in Warrens expression, i.e the choking on his drink ,making his opponent believe he’d won , not in the his hand of cards.

He was turning his full house into a a bluff trying to represent TTTT. Pretty stupid imo. Just check and evaluate.

@@dochmbi You can see by his expression when he shows the jack that he wasn't bluffing, genius. Also, why would any accomplished player try to bluff someone off the best hand he ever has in that spot?

@@dochmbi that wasn’t a bluff. You’re trying to use current poker logic on a 60 year old film. He didn’t think, can I get kings full to fold. He didn’t think, the guy can only call if he has kings full. He thought, I have a full house and he has two pair or a smaller full house, even though Beatty played it like he had the King under there the whole way which is muddling your thinking even further because aside from the fact it’s a film, it’s obvious he check raises 4th street with 3 kings in case his opponents does have the ten.

Started from the bottom now we here

He actually can call with 3s full if he thinks the other has three 10s only.

U r so riight

He watched another opponent fold a King. The odds of Beatty having the last king is astronomical.

⁠@@SergeantExtremewhile I agree with this, Beatty check raises 4th street with 2 kings showing. So he’s repping that he has the case king as his hole card. Making the ridiculous over bet on fifth street really bad. The ONLY hand he can get called by is kings full

The guy should have had a fourth ten to make the additional bet. KKK33 is beaten by TTTTJ. The full house KKK33 wasn't the nuts at that point.

@@commenter6722 absolutely correct.

Actually, he has the best hand the whole time. Everyone would probably raise spilt ten’s in five card stud on first street

Utter you nonsense

He’s so vain

He had a Napoleón wanna be appearance..

casino royale

And what if jeff bezos is there playing also.

Saw Billy Gates playing blackjack in Vegas alone at a table a short distance away ; in 1988. At the time he was arguably the richest person in the world. He was playing , as I recall, with mere 25 dollar chips.

@@timothyernest6429 because he is smart with his money

If Bill Gates will go all-in with his 10 billion stack I will just wait AA and call him with my 100$ and double it)

I don't think you understand how poker works, pete

Sounds awful

and beyond.

I wish he would cut his fingernails.

Eric Porter actually, a fine Shakespearean actor and Professor Moriarty To Jeremy Brett's Sherlock Holmes

rsteine91 yea but he saw someone fold K3 earlier so the odds are damn near impossible

@@Noles4life77 ye but i rest my case still, once hes getting called it's either gonna be a 3 or a K in the hole.

A 3 in the hole loses to 3 tens full @@rsteine91

Right? The play at the end is just for dramatics for the movie's sake. Not how it would really go at the tables.

@@rsteine91 would have to be kings

The Carly Simon song and yeah some thing that song was about Warren Beatty. But than again it could be the singer James Taylor.

Stingier than string chese.

Neither do they

As in, it's awesome?

Shahbaz Sheikh table stakes my ass. “Let me fetch the deed to my house. I’ll be right back!”

Someone doesn’t get sarcasm, hmm

Did you know string betting is legal in cash games unless other players call it

@@sheldenadkins9773 Not in the casinos. The dealer enforces the no string bet rule.

Sepemini is that why he giggled when he revealed his last card as in he was surprised himself?

Do you know the name of this movie? I want to see it.

Mike Kirkland it’s in the video description. I’d write but the title is too long

@@obiwon76 Except in this scene he's not wearing the glasses that can tell him what the cards are. If you'd actually watched the movie you would know that he needs his glasses to read the markings on the cards that he put on them in the factory. This particular hand is played straight up.

@@thisismyyoutubecommentacco6302 Close but not quite right - the key details is that the deck of cards was changed to one he COULDN'T read (hence no glasses).

Yeah that was a nasty slow roll lmaooo builds tension in the movie but in real life that guy probably would have tried to murder him after that

hard slow roll

rd711 its not allowed

@@1SheepishWolf back in the day there were no rules... No limits was no limits if the table allowed it. People got killed all the time in the wild west over card gsmes

lol, yes he met his Waterloo.

Casino Royale was written in 1953, perhaps the inspiration for this film came from that novel.

@@joeebloggs6356 Wasn't it Baccarat in Casino Royale?

For sure, the sweat was real. He could have had the case ten for all he knew. Hardly a poker player that hasn’t lost an all in to a one outer.

He seemed like the kind of guy you hang call up when you are bored- "hey, bro, what you up to?"

This scene was the reason why I wanted to watch this movie. Unfortunately, it was a bit blander than I expected. Everything in this scene looked so awesome, the villain, the tension, the main character's quirky acting. I felt like there could've been more to this movie then as directed. Look at the guy at 3:39 I mean LOOK at the guy. He has a face and acting that defines charisma. Just the way he swallowed that thing was perfect, I was expecting him to be best friends with the main character and tell jokes and be the be-there-with you-till-you-die friend. Same with 6:46. Look at his fucking smile. Maybe i'm just nit picking the cinema, but I feel it could've been a lot better :(

@@uncleruckus9670 What is the name of this movie, could you tell me please?