Lord of the Dance?

Or he could pay the 36 quid like anyone can aha

@@HerbertAckermans , they need to give Charles Lord a danceship

yaaaaaassssss

David Mitchell has already been asked to be on Taskmaster and said no: "I've been asked and I've said 'no thanks', explained Mitchell. 'It's a very good show but I don't want to be on it. My feeling is that I'd be shit but not in a funny way.'"

I'm loving Miles Jupp and Mickey Flanagan on the panel of anything cause they have my two favorite laughs in all of UK comedy

My God this absolutely needs to happen it would be fantastic but they're all men so won't happen probably

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p5iCnaiS0LrPfac.html

No there's not, it's equivalent to saying there's only one way to drive on a public highway in the county of Devon. If one assumes many things, such as wanting as little damage to skin & underlying tissue as possible, wanting to use blades as opposed to chemicals, etc etc ad nauseum.. then one might eventually say there is a 'best way,' but it is not the same thing as there being 'one way.'

A catfish. To skin a catfish is what the saying is means.

True dat. He also thought atheists absolutely denied the existence of a god, rather than just denying the validity of any 'evidence' which 'proves' his/her/its existence.

@@urbanskiboguslabsrecording7531 Had I meant omniscience I would have written omniscience but thanks so much for joining in. I'm sure we are all elevated by your input.

David Michell is not 'posh'. And no, proof was never needed, we have the House of Commons.

It's ironic that you're trying to bash Mitchell for being 'posh' here, when using such pretentious phrasing. It's also revealing of course, that you believe somebody can only be 'intellectual' if the grounds of their intellectual experience are the same as yours.

@@pseudonayme7717 The meaning of the word 'atheist' has *always* meant to deny god. If 'you atheists' who have discovered the ridiculous childishness & arrogance of your earlier position want to redefine the word.. tough shit. Get another one. Frankly though, your phrasing shows you are still the old breed. No doubt you claim to be some variant of scientific rationalist when you say such things as 'denying the validity of any evidence which proves x.' Your position is no more based in factual observance or rigorous analysis than the most backwards of theists.

No. One successful film does not make a genius, as his subsequent career path demonstrates. Talented with much potential in 1975 maybe. If he had directed too, and gone on to write and direct further Oscar winners then the case could be made. But really, no. As for his paintings... discuss!

@@domb8448 You seem to be (wilfully) entirely missing the point - which is that when people 'snuff it' after a partial, critical or cult success - they're often given credit for a future that never existed(So often it's not just normal, it's almost guaranteed). Hell, it even happens with people whose careers die a death but for whom, for one reason or another- people choose to credit their failures to something other than themselves.. such as when people blame 'alcohol/drugs/bad relationships' for the failure of a given person's career, when every person who succeeds has to succeed through their own often similar troubles. Of course this love affair with the counterfactual/ridiculous predictions based on spotty & almost irrelevant data is not exclusive to actors & directors... Still though, the kind of people that pretentiously call artists 'genius' for doing what millions of others would if they had the time, support & funding.. are not the kind of people to hail Rambo or any of Stallone's pictures even good, because true 'art' & 'genius' are not supposed to be penetrated by the unpretentious, they have to be in some way exclusive.. & for the true critic.. arbitrarily exclusive is the best kind.

I assume you mean First Blood, not 'Rambo 1'. I think Stallone made a conscious choice to go the route of creating an image as an action star and making a ton of money rather than pursuing more artistically satisfying work. He could have gone either way, as his performance in CopLand attests. But most people even now don't remember how good those early films were. If he'd died then, I think he'd be largely forgotten by now.

@@WalterLiddy you picked the perfect image Walter, Mitchell is a pedant and he'd make the same critique. I changed it to First Blood just for you. Thanks for the heads up. Copland was well made, and it did showcase his talents, but I think Rambo and all his work including The Expendables actually represent his "artistically satisfying" efforts. Andy Warhol painted soup cans, I don't like the images, don't care for his vision, but that's Andy's work. I don't think Stallone's case is like that of Scott Fitzgerald who wound up typing out scripts for Hollywood shows long after The Great Gatsby was ''borne back ceaselessly into the past.''

just noticed this channel has reuploaded the same couple episodes several times, very weird

😂 electric chair

Power chair* An electric chair kills you. A power chair helps you live your life.

I would watch that show.

The internet says Hawking had ADHD, but I can't find him talking about it

"Prevalence of Neuropsychiatric Disorders in Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis" published in 2022 in the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation found a high rate of ADHD and autism in participants with juvenile muscular dystrophy. Fascinating

Boohoo

Three of them have degrees from Cambridge University, so I doubt it. But I also don’t know if you’re being sarcastic, as sarcasm doesn’t read well over text in some instances.

@@danielarthur3137 Stallone is worth over $400 million totally self made. Three degrees from Cambridge equals no more than one expert on buggery. You can move along now.

@@ZIGSVIDS Because, of course, money is the ultimate gauge for intelligence and personal fulfillment. It's why every football team in Europe is filled to the brim with geniuses.

@@soppero No Intelligence is defined by how many times the uppity fools been on a stupid English panel show. You can move on now.

​@@ZIGSVIDS if money defines intelligence, then I feel very sorry for you