OFF-GRID MY FRIEND, LOUD & PERFECTLY CLEAR. BUT THERE LEADERS & LEADERS, THERE ARE FEW, VERY FEW WHO ARE WILLING TO SACRIFICE THEIR LIFE FOR THEIR PEOPLE. " THAT IS WHY, "THE CHRIST" IS ETERNALLY OUTSTANDING!!!!!. HE DID NOT RUN FROM HIS ENEMIES ---- & HE MADE NOT A SOUND WHEN BEING CRUCIFIED ---- THE ETERNAL CONQUERER!!!!!!! I ADMIRE THE "IMMORTAL" NOT THESE PETTY MUNDANE RULERS!!!!!!!

That is one of the smartest things I’ve ever heard. I’m on board with that.

How would putting the UK leadership in harm's way help prevent an attack by an adversary?

@@yuchoob I didn't specify just UK leadership. Wars are started by elites for their own benefit and pose no real risk of death to them. If they were the very first to be eliminated you can be sure there would be very few wars.

LOUD AND CLEAR!!!!!!

Same, put me at the epicentre

And miss out on the finest radroaches, brahmin, and deathclaw recipes??

That was the problem in UK/EU most countries just didn't bother because they needed too many bunkers and not much point in the end. But the swiss.. one place for every citizen in every town..

@@Xiph1980 Don't forget Mirelurks.

same, I've seen the movie Threads

Additionally all power plants unmanned would overheat and explode adding further radiation for tens of thousands of years.

Yes-and you rarely see that effect on many nuclear videos.

It was. In the present, Britain is edging closer to nuclear war than ever before. The main reason for this, apart from acting as a vassal to U.S. empire, is the unstable situation where a much larger and more powerful U.S./NATO now has enough hubris to no longer fear a nuclear confrontation with Russia. NATO is not a defensive alliance but a framework of U.S. empire. It is a tool designed to defend U.S. interests first and foremost, as its European members are even pulled into U.S. imperial wars that are detrimental to own interests e.g. the Iraq war (which led to terrorism, economic damage and refugee crises in Europe). However, NATO's expansion to former Warsaw pact and now ex-Soviet countries was always about weakening and isolating Russia, with a long view to disintegrate, disarm and ultimately plunder the former superpower. The main problem with this plan is that they are still armed like one. A large part of NATO, including Britain, does not posses adequate defence against Russia's modern nuclear weaponry. I believe our masters might be quite safe behind concentrated defences with their GMD, THAAD, Aegis, Patriots etc. But what about us? Our current leadership is convinced they can survive that, probably in some deep bunker. But what about us? When do we get to vote on all the incredible political stupidity that puts us collectively at risk? Oh yes, there is no vote on NATO. That sort of Brexit is not allowed. But the master did appreciate an economical Brexit from the EU, since a more divided Europe is easier to control and allows American businesses to make more profits here.

My uncle was in ‘Threads’. Well, his hands were lol, he was the milkman near the start of the film.

@alxgu198 lol 😆 oh dear, his fate was sealed the morning he went on his milk round.

@@chrisholland7367 😂👍

@@odineproci2455 what is all this drivel? have you not got anything better to do or anything more worthwhile to contribute?

"HAAAMMMMMMOOONNNDDD!!!"

It's time to end

What could go wrong?

Still, could be worse.

And on that terrible disappointment ... for you!

No one expects the nuclear option!

​@@koshintokoshinto nobody expected the Spanish inquisition

That’s different.

Was this a whole video to show that Mike can’t pronounce the word Nuclear?

As long as its in the USA or the UK the world would be better off after

Lol yeah I say if one is coming for Manchester I'm watching it.

Its near!

Cancer would be the least of your problems

@@owthattickles8738 yeah, mutants and zombies must be the Worst

Famine

Oppenheimer....odious criminal.

Imagine being so intellectually lazy as to think a single government can "control" the world.

Did you expect a cooking video?

🤓

🧀

but only if adequately supplied with lurpak.

​@@gewglesux invented in 1901

The council issued white bread stays fresh for decades.

Haha, yep. I immediately thought of Homer Simpson. "Nuculer. It's pronounced nuculer"

You could make a drinking game out of it

@@fdsman lol.

@@405pugMi *pronounced Oh, the irony!

@@Okurka. fat thumb syndrome strikes again..

Think BIG..... Mortgage!!

Absolutely, if politicians didn't have bunkers to hide on they would think twice about using nuclear weapons

Agreed 🤝

Money talks. Unless humanity launches dozens of nuclear weapons simultaneously and renders the world uninhabitable, the rest of the world outside the blast zone will still exist and money will still hold its value. That is what I assume at least.

Biological weapons are FAR more effective,, witness CoVid

I’m glad our leader get to survive, let them eat cockroaches and scorpions when they crawl out of their little hidi holes, let them enjoy the dark world where rotting flesh taints the air.

This was Donald Trump's argument, when it was suggested that North Korea should be nuked. Trump didn't see why US taxpayers ought to fund infrastructure improvements in NK......

🤣

🤣

If it was dropped on Bradford that definitely would be the case.

You couldn't make Wolverhampton any worse even with a nuke.

Putin would....he's a narcissistic gangster living in his own psychotic bubble....he 'thinks' he'll live for ever. The 'creature' ruling North Korea would...

A certain country led by a lunatic might just press the button, wait and see. Look to the East.

An excellent video. It was only distracting hearing the guy say "nucular" instead of "nuclear" every minute.

You only need one lunatic on the trigger! Unfortunately, Putin is a lunatic!

That’s why we have our nuclear deterrent.

Except for the bit where he keeps saying "new-que-lar".

They say it's because of the rock that Cheyenne Mountain is made of. It creates a fused shield when exposed to extreme heat. It's also really obvious which mountain is Cheyenne. 😂

@@darrinnoble this is true lol. It’s not exactly hard to spot.

Even during the design phase it was accepted a direct hit would destroy it. The belief of the time, now validated as true, was such levels of precision were not possible with initial guidance systems.

@@JG54206 Not hard to spot, unless you are trying to calculate ballistics from a few thousand miles away using inertial guidance systems. Then it is very hard to spot.

@@bertram-raven I would imagine that scenario would add quite a bit of difficulty and complexity to the equation.

I originally subscribed for the Bugout Bunker, so we've kind of come full circle

Cheery stuff😂

One small correction to your correction, Leuchars is no longer an active RAF station either. The Army have control of what was RAF Leuchars now.

Somewhere else will certainly be the new equivalent

it will not fall 1 , but thoussands of them over uk,,, you ahve been warned.

@@robertokandal well; if the Russian aim is as terrible as your spelling and grammar I think we will be just fine thanks. Off you go now 😊

@@robertokandal that's what we get for sticking our nose into a War that has nothing to do with us -'we're like a subsidiary of the US in this Country. Everytime they say 'jump', we say 'how high' !?

fusion bomb 'impressive'? The works of JS Bach are impressive, the works of Shakespeare are impressive , not fusion bombs.... fusion bombs are the stuff of nightmares.

@@jamesbarbour8400 and Belarus and Serbia? 😂

Thorm ONLY HE WHO MADE THE WORLD 🌎 CAN DESTROY IT!!!!!? THIS WORLD DID NOT MADE BY CHANCE OR BY GUESS!!!!! THE SEASONS COMES & GOES IN FAULTLESS ACCURACY, LIKE WISE THE SUN & MOON!!!! WHY DOUBT THE POWERS OF ----- THE ALMIGHTY!!!!!.

The human species has always made war. Horrible species in that regard. it shows no signs of stopping. Putin invades a peaceful democratic neighbour and goes about demolishing and drowning it. Warlords fight with modern weapons in Sudan and, as the man said, 'so it goes'.

Keep hoping because that will never happen. War always has been and always will be a part of human civilization. To expect otherwise is naive

Test y

@@AnarchAngel1 yes you are all thinanadams sons

@@AnarchAngel1 a lot of things change. We used to do human sacrifice for the Gods. Capital punishment is slowly going away. To say war will always be a part of life is a bit pessimistic.

We had raves in the “secret bunker” back in 2002-2004 - Bangin’ indeed. Ffs I’m old now.

The Blast Doors are deliberately placed at right angles to direction the blast would come from, to reduce the impact to the door.

Except that he can't pronounce "nuclear" correctly, throughout the whole thing.

all those who are righteous will increase And all those wicked will act in righteousness in order that they will not be cut off As wicked does not support those righteous They will lie down and not get up.+They will be extinguished, snuffed out like a burning wick. How have the anointed shown themselves to be people for the name today To worship and serve Jehovah accept Those who are not spiritual how was this foretold in bible End the son of man ? For angels , to separate The sons of the kingdom Look! I am doing something new; I will make a way through the wilderness The wild beast of the field will honor me, The wild beast of the field will honor me, For I provide water in the wilderness, For the ostriches For my people to drink I formed for myself The people Who grew You have not called me I have bought And I have not compelled I am the one bring me Prove me your right side The one for my sake Taken from my own body For her sake - Bring me a gift

To be fair, over 2000 bombs have already been detonated, above ground, underground, under the ocean, in the atmosphere, you name it. We are living in a post nuclear environment. Makes you wonder doesn't it.

I agree, better more loss of human lives then than this monstrousity threatening the very existance of our world as it is now. I think somebody took the wrong decision and they didn t have much forsight to see what would happen.

Depends on the wind direction, most will probably starve if there is a nuclear winter.

Someone was going to develop them eventually. I'm glad it was the US to do it first rather than certain other nations.

Not sure on 50% as I say it as new clear . Not to mention it’s literally English and you’re complaining English saying English wrong

Unfortunately, it's likely because of The Simpsons.

The weird thing is he can say "nucleus" correctly (he doesn't say "new-que-lus"), but he does say "new-que-lar". I would agree that it's at least 50% of British English speakers say "new-que-lar". It dates far before the Simpsons; most of my school friends used to say it and now so do almost all the politicians and journalists. And yet, most of them don't say "skelington" or "Specific Ocean".

We didn't Oppenheimer did.

@@Terminator- ha you beat me to it - I was going to reference the Terminator movies. Oh well - great minds obviously think alike 🤣

​@@stevezodiac491oppenheimer couldn't look himself in the mirror ever again after Hiroshima and Nagasaki

@@tadhggoreyoneill13666 He was the lowest of the the lower... using a brain smarter than the average for evil.

@@stevezodiac491only because Werner Heisenberg was attempting a nuclear weapon for the Nazis. They actually had a several year head start but the program was vastly underfunded. The Americans didn’t know how far along they were with it though.

And jobs would still be forced necessary.

.. and that 3 million people in the UK will die.......... unemployed! Credit to NTNOCN

Especially with the subject of nuclear It is best to not allow misunderstandings or dyslexia.

@@paulbrouyere1735 This isn't dyslexia. This is a bizarre mispronunciation of a word by a significant number of people. And it's not even consistent: He doesn't mispronounce "nucleus" as "new-que-lus", so why does he insist on saying "new-que-lar"? Does he also say "skelington"?

Next he'll be axing questions about new-que-lar skelingtons in the Specific Ocean.

@@yuchoob oh great, you found a way to train spelling control😂

@@yuchoob I am internally grateful for your reply.

Right?! Lol embarrassing

I am a younger person I don’t understand what ur talking about I understand all the risks and possibilities and how devastating it is and I am in no denial at all

@@water4826 I'm glad you say that but I think you are the exception rather than the rule, judging by the average comment by peopl on the internet in the West.

@@cdeford I have had many conversations with friends and people about my age tho who do also understand

@@cdeford tho I do understand that there are some people that definitely have no idea what it’s capable of

@@water4826 I think it's more that people who lived through the Cold War believed in nuclear war as a real possibility, but in the safe (for the West) unipolar world we've had since 1991 that possibility has become too remote. People in the West have become used to running the world and ordering everything for their benefit. They can't imagine things not always going their way.

Isn't there a movie or TV show with that scenario?