There is no cure for jealousy. Our neighbors couldn’t accept India's victory yet.

catch is perfect,,,, suryakumar yadav is the man of the worldcup

Superb clarification! Also, when the ball falls on the ad rope without touching the ground it is considered six and the white line or any other previously marked line is insignificant in that case. Ad rope is always considered the boundary in ICC T20's. Third umpires with high resolution tv camera replays are not fools to give OUT. Only, dimwits who hate India's success create such controversies.

1. If the toblerone boundary was few inches before, SKY would have adjusted the catch accordingly 2. 3rd umpire had all the time to rule either way factoring in the rules. once it was adjudged out, no point arguing

Inzamam: India did boundary tampering 😢

surya took an exceptional catch and he did it according to rules

He was a honest guy before and do all analysis very accurately. India still is winner but be honest when u post videos.India is still champions.

Catch of The ERA ❤❤

Catch is well taken and legitimate.

Thankyou for clarifying

आदर करो सत्कार करो सूर्य को नमस्कार करो🙏♥️🇮🇳

It's very funny that they call it a six only when the ball pitches on the rope or crosses it but doesn't call it a catch when the fielder's foot doesn't touch the rope!

THANK YOU VERY MUCH SIR FOR CLARIFICATION AND TO SHUT THE HATERS OF INDIA 🇮🇳 AND INDIAN CRICKET TEAM.

Rope was distributed by klassen in the first inning while fielding

🧿🧿🧿.........just imagine Surya Kumar's UNISON CONCENTRATION OF MIND....BODY....EYES.....AND OUTSTRECHED HANDS IN AN ETERNAL EFFORT ENSURING A DREAM CATCH.........heartiest congrats from me ( at 81+ ) 🌹 🌻 🕊 🎉

Hey I have checked it every single thing, that line doesn’t make any sense as you can clearly see that white line is slightly faded & not properly aligned. Next you can clearly see some boundary personnels were sitting there if the boundary was moved then they would have moved it back to their original position. If you see surya’s catch from top angle you can clearly see the boundary is perfectly aligned. If you put boundary cushion on white line then it doesn’t make any proper alignment. Last but not the least if you see the catch in a slow motion you can clearly see surya’s shoes didn’t touch any boundary. Guys it was a marvellous catch ❤

I was also confused about the boundary line. Guess luck was favoring India this time

Well no one talks about the wide balls not given when SA were bowling but wide was given when India was bowling within the line

Man of the match Surya Kumar Yadav (SKY)

❤❤❤........such was the involvement ( heart & soul ) And The Will""; To Win Of Team India 🎉🎉🎉

Boundary rope is the triangle shaped form cushions, which was not disturbed. Secondly, it was a divine catch, for taking the title.

The greatest cricketing catch ever. I have seen such catches only in American Major League Baseball, even where they occur rarely. Got to be eternally called “The Catch” in cricket.

Perfectly right Sir.

Thanks for the clarification. It was a legitimate catch and was examined by the third umpire from different angles before pronouncing his official decision. If that catch had changed the life SA team is not our problem. Out of two teams one team must win. SA was unlucky as they were closer to the win but we were lucky. Our win also was genuine. Hence let's stop debating on the unworthy topic. Even 50 over World Cup finals last year in india many were saying the catch of Rohit sharma was grounded by the Australian fielder, that means his wrist was on the ground while catching Rohit Sharma and hence he was not out. But third umpire gave him out. Had he been batting continuously we would have won that final also.

Where is the front side angle..... I want india to win... Such a high profile game, where is the front Angle... Then only we can say foot has not kissed the board....

Boundary pushed a bit back to add more advertisements(ads).

Excellent Explanation. Puts all Controversies to Rest.

ICC still has the film/video of the catch. So for all doubting people plz go and check and make sure. SKY catch was completely LEGITIMATE and India won the game fair and square . By 7 runs. Welcome to the next tournament and be very well prepared.

Thank you for the great review and honest analysis.

The boundary was disturbed when kohli hit jansen a straight drive and nortje chased it.

whatever the jealous lot is saying, if the third umpire declared the batsman out, he is out. likewise in the last world cup also, in the final match between New zealand and england, the umpire's decision about runout in the last over was questioned. But that time the same people kept their moths shut. At the same time, whatever the decision, it has to be accepted.

Brilliant clarification of the rules! Let us cut out the peripheral noise

What stupid logic.. they moved the boundary by few inches for final.. really?? The board was moved early in the game after straight four by Kohli.. 1st over 6th ball.. India won.. these things happen..umpire missed it so India won fairly. Indian fans should not come up with such stupid excuses.

Congrats Sports Today for the correct explanation. I wish this video to go viral throughout the world. Already a fake video portraying ABD's voice on Surya touching the rope is under circulation.

Good point Bro. Jai Bharat! Jai hind! Proud moment for all Indian.

This is not the moment, match was over when Klassen nicked behind!!!!

His foot touch the tip of the foam advertising rope/ boundary. It should have looked at closer... definitely a six but congratulations to India. They played exceptionally well throughout the tournament. Jai Hind.🇮🇳

Boundary पर तीन बार T 20 w c लिखा है । तो पहले camera angle से left पैर दूसरे print - जो t20 wc लिखा है उसके सामने है जो कि सही है क्यों कि सामने से दिखाया गया है और दूसरे camera angle से Left पैर अगले print जो कि तीसरा print है उसके पास दिखाई दे रहा है जो कि पिछे से side angle की वजह से दिखाई हे रहा है। और जो movement Boundary पर दिखाई दे रही है जो की shoes कि वजह से मिट्टी के खिसकने कि वजह से है - तो यह साफ - साफ OUT है।

SKY’s catch is legal and Indian victory is real and worthy. India haters may bury themselves.

HE ACTUALLY TOUCHED THE BOUNDRY COUSHIN WITH HIS FOOT WHILE HOLDING THE BALL, GO SEE IN SLOW MOTION THE BOTTOM OF THE COUSHIN MOVED SLIGHTLY WHEN HE WAS HOLDING THE BALL! ITS A SIX. the umpire missed it and its poor that he lied about it

India had won the game❤❤❤

Well, i am very disheartened to say this but the boundary rope was clearly moved, i checked it again , and when Miller hits it in the air, you can see from the above angle that the ropes were clearly moved further. (I am not talking about replays, i am talking about real time from the above angle over Surya's head)

Thanks a lot, this was very comforting. You guys give the proper analysis after all the research and reasoning. Kudis and appreciate your good work.

Brilliant catch well played India 🇮🇳

new rules must be made..once u catch ..u can't step out of boundary...that will stop this controversy

Thank you for clarification

Is there point discussing this nonsense just to gain few views. No need to raise this point.

It's not out touch the boundary line World cup winner south Africa

Forget the white line his foot touched the boundary with ball in hand

Finally you guys fixed your audio. Watching this channel after long time. Good audio quality.

Wonderful explanation.

For 4s & 6s what was considered is the boundary

Excellent clear information to those who are in doubt

O I understand,Thanks for explaining i

It's stupid to say that boundary is moved..if thats the logic of giving a six then how many places in the ground would have the boundary that is accurate and not moved? Not a single place is accurate and is continuously moved by the fielders. All that is practically possible is to accept the boundary rope or the toblerone to be the boundary line and not the actual line.

Awesome clarification brother.

You are only looking at the boundary line. What about the foot position. Zoom into the foot position. He actually touch the rope with his foot while holding the ball. Sir please look at all possibilities not only the position of the rope.

That was brilliant. Finding fault is jealousy Momin hate brilliance

We have seen so many such catches at the boundary When those were legitimate then this is 100% legitimate End of story Jealous souls cant accept this fact and if it's their country, then they will accept it

If that was boundary tampering, then it's for the whole match right It's the duty of the ICC, ground men and umpire to watch for before the game started And to end it, the unbeaten Indian team lift the trophy So there ends the debate The two teams are not a part of it

There are a certain number of pitch in the ground, boundary is marked according to pitch so the dimensions changes and leave mark on boundary as multiple matches are played in a ground with different pitch

India is always great very well explained thanks bro

Boundary line clearly peeche push ki gayi hai, pure stadium mein dekhlijiye kahi bhi woh white boundary mark nahi dikh rhi, par jab woh boundary push ho jaati hai tabhi dikhti hai aur clearly jab Surya ne catch pakda wahi par boundary thoda peeche push ki gayi hai, yeh agar upar waale Spidey cam se dekha jaata toh six hota woh,

Thanks for your explanation, It has cleared my doubts.

The GAME CHANGER in the match wasn't that spectacular catch.. it was the LONG BREAK that DISRUPTED South Africa's momentum.

Thanks a lot

This catch is live looking three comentor person one is ian smit, Ravi shatri and third is SA old player is shan polak.

India won by cheating and fixing. Why the 2nd over to maharaj when he took 2 wkts in his first over? Why markaram bowled himself? why markaram did not bat well? all because was fixed match

No sir. The was no replay of foot position. I you zoom into his feet position, his foot touched the rope

THANK YOU.

Very well articulated.

There is no question of the boundary line. Point is why a much clearer and close replays were not shown? You have such repeated replays on boundary/six or a ground catch, but why there is no much clearer version of the catch when the match was at such crucial stage? This would be dispelling the doubts of the bouncers.

I am not a hater, i am truly happy with India's win, but one question when Surya took the catch on the second attempt he wasn't in the field of play as his last contact with the ground was outside the ground, please make a video explaining that

excellent clarification

In the first innings nortje pushed it, while diving, and put it back hastily, that is the reason.

A bit of common sense... its a rope. If it is pushed out from direction then it would be pulled in (shorter) from another direction. The boundary is the rope. It was not changed after the all was moved. That is why the rope is there.

Great answer for all the bafoons out there who think India cheated.

We dont want your rule point gimmicks, where is the front side angle in such high profile game... There is no clarity whether foot kissed the board...

As rule says the object or flagposts are not considered as boundary and the actual boudary is all that white line , and here, Surya Kumar Yadav crossed the white line so it's a six and not catch .All that i said in accordance with the ICC rule as shown .If someones want to deny my words reply me I am a coach in cricket academy.

What does the rule say if the fielder touches the boundary

first all the haters & naysayers cried that Surya touched the cushion, then they said the cushion was moved from its original position.

Boundary was moved about 1.5 to 2 feet away... Umpires didnt check. Sorry south africa

Superb explanation.

Still not clear. Need footage of that boundary section during that match before the incident.

Leg touch ho gaya tha boundry. second time dekh hi nahi Indian cricket fan hun but sach to bolna hi hoga

Who was talking about the boundary line was moved back or not our aurgument is sky touched his feet to the roof and is absoultely legiment "6" no question about that donot spread your misconception or deliberating manupulating the matter of the fact.

But in the footage it was visible the the boundary board was moved when he was about to release the ball back to air

Excellent explanation❤

Bhai nice clear explanation

Rule sab ko pata Siddharth Bhai but leg touch boundry hamare ind player ne catch Kiya isliye hum side le yeh galat baat clearly seen on camera

This guy has interpretted rule 19.2.2.2. incorrectly....the conjunction "and" implies that line serves as the legitimate boundary. So, its not about being disgruntled at India winning, its about fair play. On another matter, the BCCI-controlled ICC ensured that team India had the best advantage behind the scenes, in terms of logistics of the tournament. Did you ever hear of Indian team being stuck at the airport for 6-10 hours? Did you ever hear of the Indian team travelling 2 hours to their practice sessions? Ask Afganistan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and South Africa. Not to mention the horrible pitches these teams had to play on. So, yes, accept that India has highly advantaged logistically for this WC, just like in the 2023 50-over WC. So, I think people are not jealous against India winning, but against the umpiring and unfair advantage that India seems to have over other teams (not to mention their per-existing knowledge of playing venues and opponents). Lastly, why schedule matches at 10.30am , during work times, only to appease the Indian population? Results could have been different if matches were played in the evenings.

How can you be sure that it wasnt disturbed? Was there a camera on that rope throught the match making sure the boundry was not disturbed?.....you just proved it was a six cause the white line is the orginal boundry and that holds even if the physical boundry is pushed back.

Good explanation, Just for interest why would the boundary have been shifted before the game? The rest of the boundary seemed to be on the line?

It's clearly a six .....but only if surya wasn't there😂😅😅

Well said, Sir. Kettleborough's decision was bound to be contentious. Even considering if he was unaware of this rule, I felt his decision was made rather hastily.

Bro he touched the boundary line with his feet .plz look with all angles

Catch caught caught... it's not caughted

1:55 even the board was behind from the beginning but as per 19.2.2.2 rule the white line is to be considered.. you are saying that white line was for previous occassion .. this is verbal and white line is final for all occassion as per 19.2.2.2

There was no white line near the boundary , there are videos available that can be watched . Like and dislike could form a nation all by itself !! What the big deal about a photo shopped line on a photo !! Umpires officiating the match were ICC umpires ( not India umpires) and they asked for third umpire’s decision considering that there is no way on field umpires could see clearly what happened at the boundary line !! 3rd umpire had reviewed from 2 angles and confirmed that catch was legitimate!! Umpires are from England whose team was beaten by india !! Why would any ICC umpire help team India , that too in a World Cup finals?? ( as it would be scrutinized 1000 times ?? ) As someone has correctly pointed out there is no cure for jealousy!!

It is a Six, not Out