He left clues in the shining,unless he was just screwing with people.

yes poor Kubrick die after that .

Stealing other people's comment from Kubrick based videos

Robert Scott Hahhahahahaha ! Nice one.

@Russ Gee We can also rebuild a Model T Ford. Would you want to drive one at 45 mph or less?

😂😂😂 so true how can people disagree

Actually we can't define what a woman is. But as soon as you mention "wage gap" then the women are suddenly identified.

I gotta steal this!!!😂😂😂😂😂😂

@@danielg6566 underrated comment.

@@danielg6566 Best comment!

Yep! Moreover, they tracked, confirmed, and congratulated NASA on the achievements.

@@DemonDrummerand afterwards, both sides resumed the nuclear arms race, because, you know, dick measuring contests are more important.

@@MisterMcKinney Sadly, that they did.

True bill, and the USSR were as crooked as the sickle and as ruthless as the hammer that crossed it lol

Yes because they wanted to claim that they done so as well you idiot🤦‍♂️

he didn't touch on a single anomaly about the moon landing, because if he did, he wouldn't be able to explain it, so instead he goes for this ridiculous cop-out, its a joke

You need an English teacher not a science teacher… na only messing god bless

​@@scabbage1520 How is it ridiculous???? That is the problem with you moon conspiracy proponents, logic is lost on you

@@GammaSouljahdon’t argue it’s the dunning Krueger effect. He thinks he knows more than Neil who dedicated his life to this while he has no qualifications..

Yes he’s a great bullshit artist !!!

But i don't think they follow the same process because of their distinct composition.

@@subhasdh2446 I think the point is that if you have the resources, the money, and the technology to create something that can transform Mars into to Earth, then you should've used it instead to create something that can turn Earth Back into to earth.

I don’t think so.... cause other giant corporations will get in your way.....

That’s such a stupid statement. It’s false.

Kasu are you suggesting that nobody’s currently doing it?

🤣🤣🤣🤣

It was filmed, but it was here on Earth. Stanley Kubrick’s admission shortly before his death. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jMilhttelb_Yg30.html

@@Comedy-Cult Not only is that not Kubrik. That guy seems out of his rocker.

@@Comedy-Cult not even Kubrick 😂

Lmaoo

A very good point. I would just add that greed is a powerful drug. In order to fix the Earth, a lot of very rich people would have to give up their revenue streams.

Starting with the billionaires.

Because it's not profitable to do so , the World is ruled by Money !! And always will be , their called " Globalists " & we are pee ons !!!

The way to terraform Mars is with large thermal detonations at the poles... you can see why we don't do that here. Go research terraforming methods first. You'll see extremely obviously why it doesn't work on a populated planet.

As we see these days, you can invest and be green earth as big as you want , other countries are going to do other things. Sure they will say one thing and do another.

There are only few quotes that can qualify as quotes of the millennium and this is undoubtedly one such.

phenomenal

Earth would still be overpopulated, and at some point we will still need to head out. Or slow down heavily on the reproducing.

Djara Colman that's true but this comment and vid was talking about moving the entire population

Exactly what Ive said before.

i like the irony of how all the conspiracytards quote that, btw there's no evidence that Mark Twain actually wrote this phrase

And by that I asume you mean, it's easier telling people that we didn't go to the moon that to convince those nutheads, that we actually went to the moon.

@@iphoneconpolenta541 how is the pasture doing?.

I've used that quote to describe how Trump got elected, and continues to have supporters.

@Laurence Davighi ha ha sharing your opinion...as if it means anything...LOL

*Going down the proverbial 'Rabbit Hole' of Conspiratorial Thinking* One of the important characteristics of conspiracy theories such as the SIX Apollo Moon Missions were faked, is that they are immune to real evidence. All evidence is interpreted to support the conspiracy. Correct evidence is hidden. Contradictory evidence is planted. And faced with evidence that might disprove the conspiracy, believers move the 'goal posts' and make excuses. This is often seen in the tactic of the 'Gish Gallop'. Example. Changing the subject of discussion. *Generally there's a double standard for evidence. Official sources can't be trusted. But a random nobody guy on You Tube, or a podcast knows the truth* And often the evidence is simply perceived motivations and the vague notion that something must be wrong. If you care about what really is truth, it's important to protect our beliefs from falsification. If a belief is true, it will withstand scrutiny. So scrutinise them. Importantly, there are real conspiracies, but finding them requires critical thinking and evidence. Not conspiratorial thinking. The bottom line is, Critical Thinking is empowering. But conspiratorial thinking is anything but. So it's best to avoid the proverbial 'Rabbit Hole' of delusions.

What's the point of this? Unless there is some evidence that throws the moon landings into doubt, you are wasting your time.

No man has set foot on the moon. AMERICAN MOON documentary is a must watch... on YT free.

If we went to the moon, which we didn't, then it would be as obvious as the dawn and the sunset. There is absolutely no proof that this event ever occurred. I could go on. The people who have highjacked your mind through mandate, legislation, bought media and implied force, have MADE you to believe in a God that does not exist. Keep believing, see where it gets you. There are rocket stages lying in the bottom of the ocean that you are forbidden to investigate, near the impenetrable depths of Antarctica. Realize that God does exist. Not in the way you are trained to believe, but in a way that you may finally rise to understanding of WHAT IS. Religion, as we are trained to believe, is just another money motivated force that seeks to distract us from WHAT IS. Truth works. It works despite belief. As belief is based upon unfounded "understanding". Go ahead and buy the bill of goods that you pay your tax dollars to sustain. Keep paying, and you you will get exactly what you paid for: LIES, DISTRACTION AND UNWORKABILITY. Knock yourself out! p

There is a laser reflecting mirror placed there for measuring the Earth-moon distance. They fire a laser and do just that twice a day. What more proof do you want?

Yep! And let’s not forget, the followers for all those gods have the same exact excuses and “evidence” to prove their gods’ existence.

I would follow the God who the entire worlds calendar is based off of Jesus Christ

@@TheDirtymikenation You didn’t get the quote’s meaning…

maturity is when u realize that all those different Gods with different names worshipped by different people is actually the same entity. The same God is known by different names to different peoples

@@Sumit_Sinha347 Actual maturity is when you realize all those thousands of gods have the same evidence to substantiate their existence as any other; none.

Yes. This applies so strongly to Apollo deniers. They’ve watched American Moon, or A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon or whatever, and they have been fooled by it, and there is no reasoning with them.

Well said!

@@paulbeardsley4095 James Bond exposed the firmament and the fake Moon landing back in 1971 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/jcVdjdpyksCmk3k.html

the moon landing happened 100%. it was broadcasted on tv, live, during the cold war. there were absolutely no reason why it would of have been made up or why it would fail. the technology was super advanced back then, they could of have gone to mars if they wanted. nowadays its impossible though, we dont have that level of super technology anymore

It’s sad

@Boxing 101 so your logic is: if all the balls on the pool table are round, that means that the pool table also must be round. right?? lol

@@Qodesheem WTF!?!? get a hobby.😁

@@Qodesheem No. Actually, your interpretation led me to think of the balls as celestial bodies and the table as spacetime itself rather than another celestial body. And yes, celestial bodies are round (balls) and spacetime geometry is pure flatness (table). Of course the latter can be distorted to not me flat, but that's another topic.

@@Qodesheem no, but everything in its original form is spherical (atoms, molecules, cells), it would then beg the arguement that earth would be as well.

@@jamey7003 there is no curvature of the earth..

Dude finally I’ve been telling people to start thinking about it. If we never went to the moon the when russia and China and the other 20 countries that have been there would have said there is no flag or plaques

And we all know they wouldn't lie. Words don't prove things, evidence does, and we don't have reliable evidence. What we do have is a space cult that shuns or ridicules non-believers, which they call deniers and conspiracy theorists (heretics).

What people watched on TV was not a livestream but a film.

@@dharmaqueen7877 You are incorrect. We have overwhelming evidence that proves humans walked on the Moon. Try again? Do better, learn.

@@dharmaqueen7877 Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal. Do better, learn.

I know a guy who worked on one of the recent King Kong movies, but even he's smart enough to know that King Kong isn't real, LOL.

@@scoobtube5746 🫵🏻parisyte

@@scoobtube5746 aka stusue ◁=== And *WHAM !* This HOAXTARD has been *SMACKED DOWN* yet again. LOL 🤣

​@@scoobtube5746 What if he said the King Kong movie didn't exist even though he worked on it? 😁

typos…. I’ve met Jim Lovell and heard his first hand experience of Apollo 13 ! A really engaging Man! CG

i tell my toaster hi every day

🤣😏🤣😭

I say "good day sir" to my dry cleaner for drying my skids

I always tell my alexa thank you after she does something right

@@austinhelton1847 I do as well, and same to the Google Assistant. Though not necessarily because I think they'll take over the world (at least not in my lifetime), but because they'll grow smart enough to comprehend the differences between general kindness and bigotry. General Artificial Intelligence and machine learning. And when that time comes, I want it to be known that I welcome them as equals, and that I mean no harm and would love to learn more from them.

* Geo Engineering. But I don't think that's right... Mars allows failures in the process. Earth doesn't.

I think the ultimate reason of being multiplanetarey or travelling to mars is the human curiosity to discover beyond our world,in other words its really fun

@@AshleyWilsonAU XD oops, I think I just blew up Hong kong so maybe this isn't such a good idea.

It's true, but it might still be a good idea to make a test run on Mars to make sure we get the technology right before we do it on Earth.

I loved that line.

That is the definition of a wet dream.

@@xxgoodboy1499 wow 😂

@@abdullahfahmimagnifico i'll take that as a compliment.

@@xxgoodboy1499 bruh c'mon

He DOES actually concede to "let's keep looking" when it comes to the unknown & someone asks the right questions or someone makes the right statements that are STILL open to conjecture. On every subject. Basically.

Its not

Mars can be transformed into a earth like planet with polution and some other things, mars is cold as fuck but earth is about to get to hot so there is no way to change that

Search: Neil deGrasse Tyson meets Post Malone It’s hilarious!

@@jason54770 i can guarantee u it's not going to

Mmm

Left elbow is about 100 mtrs up from ground level, thats a fuckton of water dude. Dayum

Correction : 44mtrs. The entire statue is about 93mtr

Bahahahahahahahah

You can't terraform earth without someone noticing

That is the problem of using logic. House is not planet so corrupted analogy

No One chills

It is you fool what made the Frisian people leave the coast in the 100-300 AD only to go back after 400 AD was it Romans driving SUV's or natural cycles?

Hmm.....if you have the power to move granite slabs of 10 to 3000 tonnes with apparent anti gravity ease....when building the Pyramids and Sarcophagi...then upgrading it to other structures.......could be a doddle! Why not?

*Elon Musk has left the chat*

Don't get me wrong, i still think that terraforming mars is a good idea

The difference would be there's nothing on mars fighting against the efforts. We COULD change earth, but it would require ALL or at least the majority to be on board.

I loved this as well! We think we are so powerful and so important... it’s like... in comparison to the planet, we are smaller than ants. We are probably the earths germs. Lol good catch!

No one's sure we have the power to do one so who's to say we can do the other :p and good luck getting countries like China, India or Mexico to become eco friendly. Many things are possible but I think change will have to be forced upon us, like a drug addict hitting rock bottom.

Makes sense..perhaps whatever terraform other planets is just doing the same here ,so we know it takes time to do this process howling who knows but I can say this we are f word! We cant stop it .

How about aliens living underground of mars

tambem sempre gostei deste tipo, fiquei admirado por ver alguem a falar daquele tremor de terra que matou cerca de 100 000 pessoas, Lisboa ardeu dia e noite durante 5 dias.

Too true. That's why conspiracy theorists are like cultists: once they've been convinced that they're "awake" and "know the truth", it's nearly impossible to bring them back to reality, no matter how many times their leaders are caught lying and their evidence has been proven to be wrong or even outright fabricated.

@@kevinskinner4986 Wow, that went right over your head!

@@magnus4346 I think it went over yours. I'm well aware that most of the people saying that are conspiracy theorists going "Ha ha, you're all brainwashed and won't believe it." My point is that most of the time, it describes themselves. It's called "irony". Here's another Twain quote to ponder. "Never let the truth get in the way of a good story."

@@kevinskinner4986 if you a Sunday Christian stop it, you all are under strong delusion

Kevin Skinner Could not have said it better, All the retards think they are right when in reality, they are just idiots that like to think the opposite just because the government said one way, and oh lord the government lies about everything.... Well Actually, no, theres a thing called science and history records, where such things are obligated to publicly release to the press, The woke ones are the people who actually read and educate themselves based on what theyve learned, which is fine because thats the truth. Could not have said it better, Its Ironic, It reminds me of trump supporters

xc5647321 xc5647321 um what

I wouldn’t say genius. Just common sense.

Within your context, "ingenious" might have been the more accurate term. With that now clarified, I ask you: Is it ingenious to conclude the Earth is no longer Earth?

What how? Lmaaooo this kids inspired by Neil Tyson omg the cringe 😭😭

@@1Morpheus cringe? Explain

Nope. Just had very well planned missions. Read up about it in an honest way, how they accomplished the SIX Apollo Moon Landing Missions. Educated yourself all about it. Stop being willfully ignorant.

Dumb

the lunar rover needed to fill up right? btw, did they park that in a good spot and does it need a jump start?

@@CFIBarrySeal-vl5jc Hush Mr Ignorance Personified, your idiocy is on public display here.

@@apolloskyfacer5842 i would buy one of those steering wheel locks for that rover....china about to inpound it for illegally parking it on china land for last 65 years

you poor thing.What did the police say?

@reign That's what I thought. I was expecting a video on the moon landing not all the other stupid questions.

@@richardarkwright1224 I think that you are missing the point here. I hate such clickbait titles. Don't you?

@@p.s6742 No, to be honest. It want that long ago these professional, free videos were not widely available. Id feel like a spoiled, entitled moron if I were to complain that that the mastermind Im watching goes off topic here and there. Im assuming the video is titled as such because its the first thing he spoke about. It never fails to amaze me how people get angry or even slightly pissed off that the video that cost the producers money was not tailored for that individual.

yep

There are a number of YT videos that explain why there really is no such thing as true Artificial Intelligence. It's really SI (Simulated Intelligence)

Yeah. I don’t think it’s nearly as advanced as “they” proclaim it is. Don’t get me wrong it is literally astronomically more advanced than it was 50yrs ago. However, that is combined with the advance of design and data input. I personally think, at least to a certain degree, it’s great marketing by the tech industry.

"can we be kinder to one another ?" You're asking a bit too much there, buddy.

@@tomsriver2838 delete twitter first and maybe

Toms River was about to comment the same. Turning Earth back into Earth is possible but being kind to one another nope. I almost got knocked out by a woman because of toilet paper.

Yeah, the united states was built on hatred. And yet it's the #1 county in the world 🤔 (slaves)

Mason Ulrich I'm aware of America's history but the lady that tried to uppercut me Tyson style was German, I'm from there. Btw: I think Denmark, Iceland and New Zealand are the top 3 countries in the world. America ist the most entertaining

well they went to space first and came back ?

Bro I hear people ask questions like this all the time and it makes me really fear that people Don’t believe thing because they truly understand anything. No we just built a rocket a took a big guess. Good luuuccckkk

Holy shit we sent unmanned ships monkey manned ship we did test we used science because it’s real and it works

Carl Sagan i believe was one of his inspirations

@@adarsh7914 And if I can remember well, as heard on some podcast, he actually met him...

@@matshu I thought he actually, like, mentored him.

That's exactly what he is.

Will Fishing kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mK2Ci7VpmsmVg4U.html

Same

Eduard Ritok ... Thanks, I wrote the first one a month ago and for some reason it became a thing... by the way, the statement I wrote that 15% of Americans think chocolate milk comes from brown cows is true, and not a joke...

@@yamman4482 Yeah, you're the top comment, mate

Can someone tell me please is the moon landing was really faked

r explore i dont think so we would have the technology for that and even when it was fake why would the government hide the truth? I wouldnt fucking care if they made it or not! But in space there are even lifestreams from the ISS

Not many light noggins will undestand you when you say touche....

I would love to have him over for a weekend. No TV, internet just intelligent conversation.

What's grandstanding? Sorry I'm stupid

Alex Myladoor Never a stupid question. Just people stupid enough to let their egos or other people’s judgment stop them from asking. Grandstanding means trying to impress people through what you’re saying or doing. In this case it would mean some smart person using unnecessarily big words to explain something, or complicating a topic for no reason. Neil just speaks and explains things as understandably as he can.

i think its beccause he is black. LOL

@@marcuseriksson3732 If you're kidding, ok. If not, that's moronic.

That's why Thais never went to the moon.

@@Devolgane4 Nor did we.

I feel kinda bad for you bro

Fuck the Moon where can I get me a Thai woman that cooks breakfast?

@@slickric2176 In Thailand. I get my omelets, American breakfasts, french toast.. and pancakes. The trick about finding a good woman in Thailand is don't choose the woman choose the family.

Well they certainly didn’t have the technology to fake it at the time.

MODERN AGE OF 60s/70s It's quite obvious you didn't even exist back in the 60s and 70s. It was in fact a very modern day and age. A time of great innovation and scientific discoveries. Yes, we didn't have personal computers and 'smart' phones. But we did have the Boeing 707 Airliner and the successful development of the Concord Supersonic Airliner. The 747 Jumbo commercial jet was just been built, n and the last one has just been rolled off the assembly line. The fastest jet aircraft ever built was the Blackbird SR-71 Reconnaissance Military plane. It's record of 2000 mph (Mac 3.2) plus and altitude of 85.000 ft has never been beaten, other than the Rocket Planes as follows. There were several of those manned Rocket Planes that actually went faster. The X-15 was one of those. It set a record for speed (4.520 mph/Mac 6.7) and an altitude record of 102,100 ft. It was designed to be dropped launched from beneath a B-52 . And that was just the advances in Aeronautics. Then there are the two Pioneer Deep Space probes which are now well beyond the outer limits of the Solar System. That smart phone in your hand, and your personal computer had their beginnings back in that time. It was indeed a very modern technological world. 😎

They did though.

Kickex We cannot go to the moon and here is proof: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/opN7fJBjypbDfoU.html. So it is easier to go to the moon then to make the video yet we have the video and they cannot go to the moon. So their excuses they do not want to go to the moon while they spend all of the money and resources the world has to offer trying, but they don’t want to? So all of the worlds nations could go to the moon, but they don’t want to because America did it and has a video? Is that really the stance of all the boomers and the boomers children? Let me know when you were all denying GSI and the worlds leading particle physicist as well as all of space bearing nations fact that show we cannot leave the thermosphere and that ionizing radiation is why. Good luck denying climate change just like you deny the Moonlanding you stupid nationalist zealots.

@@joemaddoxrx7 yup you're 100% right👏 now go back to smoking that crackpipe

Tomi D The only crackhead here is the one denying science and that is you. They cannot go to the moon but they can fake a moon landing. If I was wrong we would be on the moon. We cannot go to the moon no matter what excuse you come up for it’s impossible.

@@joemaddoxrx7 way to be a sheeple. There's footprints and the flags, but most importantly, they placed a reflector on the surface, which if you shine a lazer on it it'll reflect said light back. Thus, proving we've been there, i.e. manmade objects there. I probably worded that a little incorrectly, but it doesn't matter. It's okay to be skeptical, that's why evidence exist. Due diligence and thinking for yourself are important. Also, stay off the crack pipe. Thank you, have a good day.

midoribishi No there are not, because GSI has proven Apollo never left the thermosphere. You cannot sign a laser on a mirror that is not there. Apollo only went 230 miles up. Only denial of science and your cognitive dissonance is why you believe we went to the moon.

FKalo Hey quote mining is MY job! Lol. With that being said, nicely done 🍻

...and she said, _'No it's not, you're just inadequate.' _" -Alice Young

There's a lot you don't understand. Go read up about the Apollo Moon Landings in an honest way. Get educated.

Crews on the ISS stay much longer than 12 days. Some stay up to 6 months _and_ they are in “zero” gravity the entire time unlike the Apollo crews.

@@SolarChronicle The woman who fainted at the start of this video had passed only 12 days in space: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gLZmn71j1p_UcaM.html

And she spent the entire time in ZERO gravity. Also, she wasn't on the ISS. @@GirlGeekLovesStampin

@@GirlGeekLovesStampin Interesting video. It's no reason to be skeptical about the Moon landings, though. Some people run up mountains; others get dizzy from running upstairs.

just don't buy shots of tequila

What's a beer going to do?

Or a joint

Naah whiskey is better he will start spiting physics itself

@@micahkiker3041 for some people it will help on having a much better time.

Me too. I've heard it before, but never framed in a psychological sense. Makes you think that there have likely been LOTS of lottery winners who prayed to God beforehand that they win, and lo and behold - God granted them a miracle. And nobody interviews the 2 million people whose lottery prayers got ignored :)

Yeah, but there is a catch... The catch being there is a plausible possibility that when a small group of people are still standing they all throw a tail. Granted, the average would be 50/50 for heads and tails. But a small sample size is not reliable. That is why we always (should) use large sample sizes. If and when we want to conclude something scientifically meaningful.

@@wimahlers Well he did qualify that, when he wrapped it up with "And every time you do this experiment - basically - you get one person left standing". But I get what you mean. And there's as much a chance of two left standing at the end with heads as both the "finalists" flipping tails and sitting down. :)

exAMEN🌈FIRM'amen'T, ☝️👀 The rocket always follows the curvature of the firmament. Dr.🌏ip 👀☔ Psalm 118:8 It is better to trust in the Lord than to put confidence in man. anD The sun needs oxygen to breathe in space space men. My brothers and sisters are going to figure it out. HeavenO hellO

@@rainbowrocket3981 ?????

And speaking privileges…

understand the radiation would kill humans before they could reach the moon.

@@timelord54able which is why they had visors and other equipment that reflected the sunlight

@@timelord54able (Sigh…) The claim that the Van Allen radiation belts were deadly is false, a gross exaggeration and simply not supported by the data. Radiation was indeed a definite concern for NASA before the first space flights, but they invested a great deal of time, money, and research into it and determined the hazard was minimal in the scope of the mission. It took an Apollo spacecraft a little less than an hour total, to pass through the least severe parts of the radiation belts twice - once on the outbound trip and once again on the return trip. Read that again. The combined time passing through the edges of the belts, once going outbound, and once coming back, was about one hour (each way). The total radiation dose received by the astronauts was about one rem. A person will experience radiation sickness with a dose of 100-200 rem, and death with a dose of 300+ rem. Clearly, the doses received fall well below anything that could be considered a significant risk. Despite claims that "lead shielding meters thick would have been needed", NASA scientists found it unnecessary to provide any special radiation shielding. The Command Module structure was two layers of stainless steel, plus one layer of polymer honeycomb, plus three more layers of aircraft aluminum with phenolic resins in between each layer, along with several layers of mylar and kapton insulation and heat shielding. This does not count the resins used in the ablative heat shield on the bottom of the spacecraft. The walls of the Command Module were roughly three to four inches thick, as they differed in thickness in places. The total thickness of the walls of the Command Module is actually irrelevant, since lead or any of the heavier metals do not protect against the type of radiation of which the Van Allen belts consist. An aluminium alloy was used due to the very fact that the lower the atomic number, the less Bremsstrahlung (electromagnetic radiation normally in the form of X-rays produced by the acceleration, or especially the deceleration, of a charged particle after passing through the electric and magnetic fields of a nucleus). The aircraft aluminum-phenolic resins (which were specially designed to shield from the particular type of radiation found in the Van Allen belt) and the polymer honeycomb of the shell of the spacecraft were more than enough to adequately shield against the minimal radiation through which the spacecraft passed. Let me say that again, so the hoaxers will be sure to see it. The amounts of radiation the spacecraft passed through were minimal, primarily because they passed through the thinnest edges, and because the types of radiations found in the belts were shielded against. Why? Because those belts are donut-shaped, or toroidal. That means they're shaped like a giant Cheerio surrounding the earth. They also thin out significantly in terms of the density and flux of the radiation levels as they reach their outer edges. Hoaxers also make the ignorant and uninformed mistake of limiting themselves to two-dimensional thinking. Given that the belts are toroidal (imagine that giant Cheerio around the equator) and that they extend to an angular path of 26-28 degrees from a line drawn through the center of the planet to the equator, the trajectory of the spacecraft through the belts would not have taken the astronauts through the thickest part of the belt in the first place. The Van Allen belts are not like a shell surrounding the planet, they are a fairly narrow band. They begin about 600 miles above the surface, and extend out to around 3700 miles from the surface. Here's the important part: Since the belts are almost non-existent on an angular measurement exceeding 28 degrees above the equator, and the translunar trajectory of all of the Apollo spacecraft were inclined a little above 30 degrees, (in addition to the tilt of the earth on its rotational axis of 23.5 degrees) then the spacecraft missed the belt almost entirely. They only passed through the very edges of the belts in the first place. That's right, they missed almost all of the region of radiation entirely. Hoaxers never think of this. To monitor radiation exposure during the flights, Apollo crews carried dosimeters on board their spacecraft and on their persons. And these readings confirmed NASA had made a good choice. At the end of the program, the agency determined that its astronauts had avoided the large radiation doses many feared would ground flights to the Moon. In no case did any astronaut experience any debilitating medical or biological effects. Do better, learn.

​@@timelord54able indias chadrayaan 2 orbiter took pictures of both the apollo 11 and 12 sites with the lunar decent phase modules clearly visible and u can even see tracks from the astronauts.

The wow of missing the point.

Nope Wrong. Next

Your inability to understand his point is “just wow.” Do better, learn.

jesus that comment is just gold

@@thesenate9564 I second that

Science Q&A video: Slinging stuff onto the other bodies Guy on internet: Slinging shit onto other people 🤔

@@caiheang are you a fan of Billie eilish

@@thesenate9564 she probably is a 14 year old

Klabron Hames --- Congrats on your optimism, but there is a fatal flaw in the "If you can turn Mars in to Earth, you can turn Earth, back into Earth" theory. Mars is EMPTY. People LIVE on Earth. You can terraform a barren planet, but when you want to make sweeping changes to a planet FULL of people, you have to get ALL the people (governments) on board. Our only obstacle to stop the trashing of the planet is to get ALL the inhabitants on Earth to AGREE, and then, COMPLY. ---- So I don't have high hopes for that.

Plus. We’re good at heating not cooling😎

@@kathleenr4047 If everyone began meditating EVERY day..

The subliminal message here will go over most people's heads unfortunately..

The big word there is "IF". Because we don't.

Great comment, kid! I really hope your generation will put an end to this growing hysteria of basing beliefs on disinformation, misinformation and hearsay. It's critical for the well-being of society and the progress of humanity that future generations like yours prioritize critical thinking annd evidence-based reasoning. We need a culture of skepticism, fact-checking, and intellectual integrity so we can combat the spread of falsehoods and ensure that decisions are made based on reliable information rather than hearsay or the echo chambers of social media.

Yup, that was totally written by a child. All children type and think in that type of pattern. I'm sorry, but that was a terrible attempt at manipulation.

@@SolarChronicle Oh you may put all your hope in that fake user account all you will, but gen-z and gen alpha will easily be able to see that the scam you protect is just that.

@@redditsucksyo

@@SolarChronicle "I don't want to grow up into a world where people are so irrational and make decisions that affect others, guided by false beliefs." Well, with 8.0 billion people, you're going to have all kinds.

“they is statistically almost impossible” Almost impossible? So in other words possible.

@@SolarChronicle Correct, lol.

they dont want to clean up the mess...they dont want to clean space debrisw or trash we dump into oceans. So its inevitable we will choke ourselves with our own waste

Why not do both?

@@espada8077 I don't see why not!

think this guy was paid to keep silence about moon landing. Even though there is lots of footage of moon landing they won't make it public because they probably faked the landing instead of proudly showing the documentary videos and photos they are keeping most of footage classified because the more footage they show the more the reality will be exposed.if they were really confident in themselves they would have boldly shown the documentary of videos instead of hiding them. The more footage they show the more their faults will be seen .also all old good moon conspiracy videos are being removed and only few trashy videos are kept something fishy is going on

@jon pork I don't know about that . But I do know that NASA said on 2006 that they have no idea where the original tape of Apollo 11 is and the present existing videos of Apollo 11 are edited videos. Also they say they can't remake Apollo 11 and the technology for going to moon is lost. Their excuse is that the engineers have died and it's too expensive. I mean America gave free money of 1.8 billion in charity how hard will it be make a rocket of 1.5 billion And are you sure NASA can't classify things . I mean many record of Apollo 11 to 13 are missing or lost. Is this coincidence

But of course they do.

If the Moon is only 3000 miles above the flat Earth (their usual claim, before they started getting stingy with figures), then you'd think it'd be a piece of cake going there. On the other hand, landing on the firmament would be a challenge.

They have to, their unfounded, erroneous religious dogma relies on it. Do better, learn.

What he's saying is, on average, roughly half of people will flip tails (or heads) every time a flip is made.

@@SolarChronicle Correct.

😂😂😂😂

AI I am your master now bitch

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

This is why im polite to my phones virtual assistant.

I dont think we ever have to worry about a time that robots gain feelings or tale control, technology is programmed so unless we programme it to do so it is highly unlikely to ever happen. Dont be surprised to see humans become almost robotic through the advancement of technology though.

I found that when You make sense on social media... No one responds🤔 *When You fake Who You are... You get likes & responses😱

732RECCS I don’t understand honestly..I’m just summarizing what I’ve seen in a few comments on this video I’m not trying to get likes or responses I don’t care about those. I’m just saying what I see

That’s a good way to handle jealousy. You try to get to he’s level in stead of bringing him to your.

@@raintaken7610 That mindset is... THE--'I'm afraid to use My brain cause I might get slandered on the internet for being weak'--/afraid to openly get ridiculed for having a DIFFERENT opinion, mentality😕 = People are afraid to be Themselves nowadays🤔

732RECCS. It’s not that I am afraid. My point was that I like and respect this man so in stead of talking shit about him and try too seem better than him. I’ll rather learn from he’s words and try to be more like him in stead of just trashing him just to make my self feel better about my self Bc of jealousy and envy.

You’re correct. Instead, the Soviets literally tracked, confirmed, and congratulated NASA on the achievements.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 fake as fuck

He could have just not tried to explain and prove it with reliable evidence that doesn't have to be filtered through NASA.

@@dharmaqueen7877 Proof humans have walked on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the Moon landing missions that could not have been faked. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the Moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the Moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the Moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the Moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the Moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal. Do better, learn.

SIX times actually.

I'm not joking 1% here; I guarantee you know not a single human that works on AI (if you do give me a name, I'll match you with cal tech and MIT post grads). In fact I don't even think you know the scientific field which develops AI. So I'm going to help you, The scientific field is known as machine learning. And they utilize advanced mathematic algorithms in what is known as discrete choice. Which is essentially optimization of making the best choices IE ethics in relation to the data set present. Machines don't have feelings They have objective analysis based upon data sets which then drive them to make the most efficient choice based upon the information as it is presented. Essentially they are unbiased humans.

Forrest Outman give me some names from MIT and Tech.

@@jacksji8912 Sommer Gentry Doctorate in Engineering with focus on Machine Learning, professor of mathematics at US Naval Academy Annapolis and Johns Hopkins University, Scout Croft of Cal Tech jet propulsion laboratories, and Kyle Killough NASA engineer... I know each of them personally and there are more I can roll off my tongue. Ok your turn! I bet you thought I was Bullshit, wrong dude to call out. I nerd hard

Forrest Outman. Wow. You can name some engineers. You don’t have to bust a nut over it smh. And like all I was asking who you knew. I was being curious. Sorry I might have come off as a smart ass, mb.

@@jacksji8912 after seeing this post today, I realize I over reacted to your simple statement that was likey made in jest. In truth A.I. could be a threat to humanity, but in a different way than sci-fi films usually portrait. Automation has replaced some manual labor and semi-skilled workers and that will continue, but likely on a much larger scale. Autonomous vehicles will slowly begin to replace professional drivers. A.I. programs are already beginning to take writing jobs online for sports columns for example. Cashiers are increasingly being replaced etc. A.I. will eventually be able to self replicate through use of 3D printing. For now that's not a threat, but likely in our lifetime it will begin.

Forget the moon landing, we still have people who think Ricky Gervais is actually funny.

alieighty he sure it XD

@@simeonclark8825 He used to be ok about 15 years ago but most of his jokes are just crap now.

@@alieighty he wasn't being funny, he was telling the truth

@@PEDROKA47_ Yes I've noticed a lot of angry impotent people seem to like him.

I agree, somewhat, but ultimately “good” and morality is subjective.

People who think we are in a “Matrix-style simulation” need actual psychological help.

No offense but your name definitely proves that you're 81

thanks for working on a piece of history

@@AaryanGamer no the fuck it don’t his names cool as fuck Jealous kid

Thank for your work dude!

yes because the deep state knows how to find people that can talk right that's why he's getting paid to spread deceitful information. or do you actually believe we went to the moon or that the Earth is round?

@@xTROLLINGx Yes I do and I know its True 100% to think otherwise is rediculous

Try his audio book. It's free on KZfaq.

Yes!!!

Exactly

@@MaNuLaToROfficial Still being cute. A Bot calling others bots. 🤣

@@MaNuLaToROfficial You: *_”Everyone that challenges me on my baseless claims is a bot…obviously…”_* 🤣😉 Do better, learn.

A robot could have put it there.

@@gives_bad_advice Could have? Yes. Did? No.

@@DemonDrummer I agree.

@@gives_bad_advice ❤️

You would need extremely sophisticated robot to place a delicate instrument like that on the surface without damaging it. The technology at that time was not that good enough. You would need human hands to place the device@@gives_bad_advice

Josh there are a few of us that do and you seem to be one of us But every generation thinks they need to disprove the older generation to make them feel relevant .

Thanks, Sonic!

@@josephdietz3446 yeah we just have to not be idiots and that's all we need to accomplish.

@@chickenflavor9880 yes you understand that the people before us learned so much during their time why would we suppress it The IQ factor hasn't been on an upward trend mankind is as smart right now as he was 200 years ago . I think some of this is from the every participant gets a trophy just for playing coddling that some parents adopt about their children then try to live a 2nd life through the child not letting them have the choice of life . Nice talking to you Josh

That’s pretty insightful for a blue hedgehog...

cool no more bills to pay

Not after 5 billion years from now

@@fayasamd5204 more like 2-3 billion, since the Sun will expand and consume the rocky planets (mars might survive, but even then it might be vaporised due to proximity to the Sun's surface) the plus side to the Sun's red giant phase is that Jupiter and Saturn's moons might warm up enough to get life cooking, hopefully some humanoid Earth scientists are stationed there to observe the new era of our solar system

You think that your scientists are teaching you everything, they teach you that there is infinite universe that have no begening and no end and yet at the same time deny that a creator (God) who is litteraly everlasting has no begening and no end, they have become foolish to deny God but I think that we all will see him one day, either he is happy with us or he is really angry but I want you to know that there is no way to God but by Jesus christ only and you can't have everlasting life without Jesus.

@@user-vi4oj4de7q "what if we pick the wrong religion? Every week we’re just making God madder and madder" 3000 religions to choose from.

laser beam can be reflected by moon surface.

@@32hotmale Not accurately to the source. Take any laser point it directly at a mirror and it will reflect back to your body. Point it at a wall, even a white one and most of the beam is absorbed

*23 PROOFS THE APOLLO MOON LANDINGS HAPPENED* 1. There is over 18,000 photos available to the public of the moon landing missions. 2. There is thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astrologists and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retro reflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, that can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base and the flags. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched apollo missions all the way to the moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messaged FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports. 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal. *Comment courtesy of DemonDrummer 1018* 😎

@@apolloskyfacer5842 You could add that analysis by physicists of various pieces of Apollo footage has concluded that it was filmed in an environment with no atmospheric resistance and within a gravity field where g = 1.6 m/s2. A perfect example of this is the "Rooster Tail" dust trails kicked up by Apollo 16's John Young during his "Grand Prix" in April 1972. This very situation has been analysed, studied and the published results are easily obtained online. "Ballistic motion of dust in the Lunar Roving Vehicle dust trails", Hsu, Hsiang-Wen, Horányi, Mihály, (University of Colorado), American Journal of Physics, Volume 80, Issue 5, pp. 452-456 (2012). They conclude that the lack of particles’ deceleration along the x-axis of their coordinate system, could only be the case if Apollo 16’s rover footage was filmed in a vacuum. Take care.

Than to fake it such that the fakery is undetectable? Yes.

@@TheWokeFlatEarthTruth The 23 Proofs are what DemonDrummer put together. He gave me permission to use it as well. Yours would be an excellent 24th Proof.

Haha, dudes a fraud

You could read his books

Ray Bradbury. Amazing writer

Benjamin Franklin

You want to meet Ray Bradbury? Well, you can If you believe in the afterlife and IF afterlife is real and IF you and Bradbury ends in the same place AND IF both of you remember everything in the theoretical afterlife... Better read his books. Those are awesome.

@@setsunaes what da heck

Theodore Bierbauer r/woosh

@@noambelder5850 he's just saying facts

Theodore Bierbauer but isn’t gaining knowledge allowing you to gain IQ? 🤔

Joker 7 nice , now you have an iq of 10.

Great...u have 20 now

Nailed it! 💯🎯

Funny how you moontards worship money grubbing Shlomos like Ben Shapiro, LOL.

@@scoobtube5746 aka stusue ◁==== And *WHAM !* This HOAXTARD is going to be *SMACKED DOWN* yet again LOL 🤣

Well said. 👏

​@@scoobtube5746 You got to be kidding me. Even Daily Wire did a video on Apollo 11 which they took down after many paranoid comments like yours). You're all over the place.

Generally speaking, that 'mindset' goes 'hand in hand' Nincompoopery seeks out nincompoopery.

They're different flavors of the same brand of stupidity.

Not really but I’m willing to bet my life savings the Venn Diagram for the two is basically a circle.

😄😄

I called Alexa a bitch and she told me "that was not very nice".

@@mont7481 good thing she isnt controlling things in your home! Hi I'm Alexa and here is my demonstration of karma! Hot showers can get too hot!

@@Mk-cl3il 😂lol

@@robertkamenoff3918 or how about my garage door not opening or not being able to shut off alarm...scary thought! 😂😁😊😔😞😭

Natural stupidity is the main ingredient to thinking the Earth is flat & the Moon landings were faked. Oh.. and, and uhm.. Building 7, yeah.

You must be very be very terrified of our government and the current state of our society then

@@brandynkoogler4500 code brown!

@@pforbom1844 don't tell me you're a libtard. You realize the only other time in the history of our country that we were worse off was the civil war? And not by much. And its all thanks to the biden administration because of their complete and total stupidity. You may not like trump because of his policies or because he was loud and obnoxious but the dude is hella smart. Biden and the democratic party have royally fked our country so much I don't even know where to start. If you're calling me a brown noser. Where's the brown nosing? I simply see it for what it is. America is a sh** show. We are the laughing stock of the world, well maybe not quite as bad as russia losing to Ukraine but its bad.

Exactly, the democrats are more scary than AI.

Not if you are English, we had one of the biggest events in our history in 1066.

Invasion by Normandis and colonization by Cromwel? Revert if you understand what iam talking about.

"A11 work and no play makes Jack a dull boy."

@@nunyabiz1780 "All those Astronaut names makes you a nobody"

@@apolloskyfacer5842 sorry, that is debunked. go back to school and learn something.

@@apolloskyfacer5842 Impressive list of Freemasons and Mormons.

@@nunyabiz1780 ⬅*MESSAGE TO A MOON HOAX ENTHUSIAST* So, what is more plausible ? That you nobodies with zero experience in space travel,and having a propensity for fallacious logic that informs your presuppositions and erroneous desired conclusions, have uncovered some history-changing conspiracy that would quite literally change the world ? Or that you’re all suffering from an array of intellectual and psychological issues including, but not limited to, raging insecurities, trust issues, problems with authority, delusions or grandeur, and identity-protective cognition. All of which makes you somehow think you know better than every scientist and expert in the world, who are working in the field of space travel, and that you can refute the mountains of overwhelming evidence that is presented. ? *Talk about being delusional !* 🤣

You never thought of that?

I was more interested in thinking about how they might stabilize mars. I didn't look this up but I think I read that Mar's has a very wobbly orbit and it's gravity is way lower. Ii think the first thing we'd have to fix would be the planet's lack of shielding against the sun's dangerous radiation. I think getting a large number of people up there along with a lot of supplies and equipment would be the easy part. Hard part is keeping them alive long enough to get anything started.

Total head rinse

@@winterrain1947 You really believe man been on the moon?

@@fredmcfadden9979 May I inquire the reason for your question? 'Believe' is a misleading word. "Belief" is placed in the intangible, such as ghosts or demons, neither of which can be proven or disproved. People often 'believe' in that which they choose to believe, because they like that bit of data and accept it without first asking questions. On the other hand when they hear a fact that they dislike, they refuse to believe that fact simply because they don't want this to be true at all. Or maybe they don't 'believe' in something because its too complicated and they are too lazy to think about it. I prefer to 'accept' facts based on evidence. I do not always 'like' the facts that I find to be true, but must accept them as truth. I mean, for example, I do not like the fact that US currency is quickly becoming useless and worthless, but it is a fact. If I disregarded such a fact, then I put my nation in danger because disregarding facts would cause me to vote for the wrong individuals. As a science enthusiast myself, and a responsible citizen, I know that I do not have the luxury of simply 'believing' in anything without first checking facts. Nor do I have the luxury of 'refusing to believe' in facts that I do not like. As for your question; The evidences that I have seen so far in museums and videos are strongly indicative that humans have in fact visited the Lunar surface.

Same.

What about we do both

@@BIAKANOORWorld yeah after all the planet is kinda overpopulated

@@turtlesarefantastic9620 How many plants have you planted this year ? Everyone can participate directly to turn Earth back into Earth but for exploring Planets we need scientists and engineers. No offense but space exploration is a must. It is not about Geoegineering the Earth or Mars. Everything is in it's motion in space. There are a lot of chances of collision between space rocks and planets and moons. We have to try making multiplanetary beings.

@@BIAKANOORWorld you say that as if I disagree with you.

That troll has taken his bat and ball and gone back to his mom's place in her basement 🤣

It was only funny the first 700 times.

Shhh! Don't refer to him - you might end up summoning him, and I, for one, am glad he's not polluting our screens any more.

@@critthought2866 Agreed. After years of arguing with 9/11 troothers, YECs, and their ilk, I've developed a pretty thick skin. But I've seldom encountered anyone as toxic as our mutual nameless friend here.

@@therealzilch He's nothing compared to the troll Narajuna aka Wide Open aka Wild Boar. That one mostly infests the YT video Apollo 11 Press Conference by Motherboard. Even I have decided to stay away from the insanity. No fun to be had there.

yeah it kinda made me think of things differently

I would be more concerned with Wintermute.

We may have no choice but to let AI control humans. This way no corrupt lying phony greedy politician or billionaire control freaks will be able to screw taxpayers.

@@efrainrosso6557 lol

ai won't decide we are dangerous. it will decide we are inefficient.

Rebel09 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mK2Ci7VpmsmVg4U.html

Facts

#Fax

Irrefutable argumentation there. Excuse the sarcasm.

You're an idiot just like this liar Neil

So many assertions about Neil from people who can't even get his name right!

It's not.

Why is the moon footage in Fake motion

@@ciupacabraciupacabra6442 Again. It's not. Learn about things you're so ignorant about.

@sebastian Sm geographically yes.

brasto 06 not impressed by this dummy.

That's what she said!!!!

@@robertwalker7010 k

Robert Walker how is NDT a dummy?

Robert Walker Maybe not but the entire scientific community agrees with him. So... do you care about you’re children?

Yep. It's not just the documents you'd have to fake. Go read up on the subject you're so ignorant about.

Don't forget - the thousands of still photographs and the hours of film and TV footage are all part of the documentation too. And they all have to be consistent each with the other. And within all of that, the fakery has to be undetectable. Still think it's easier than just going?

Yeah. Try to think about it.

I don't think so, they are about nuke Mars to create a terrain which could make a stable atmosphere for life to thrive..so.... building the atmosphere is not same as fixing it

@@RR-gr1ni it would be possible to melt the poles of Mars to create an atmosphere but it would take over 100.000 years

Iron Man actually it is

@@carter7100 oh... so let's nuke the North Pole then

@@lucbalr do eloborate with evidence please

Your comment is underrated

But did you listen to some of them like how you actually make a flag that flaps like its on earth on the moon there shouldn't be so much crap for them to have to debunk

You are right they erase lot of them i watch a lot before they want after them because they did have a very strong argument like jarrah white and other with logic science a nd commun sense . The moon landing NEVER HAPPEN

Nasa taking down all the conspiracy videos. 😁

Yeah all good videos gone, it convinces me they never went to the moon:) it's easy to prove they went just send rovers and give us the live videos of stuff left behind but they never do it:) the most important is the huge telemetry data was gone its unfakable :)