🤣😂🤪

Very underrated comment

@@ahmedfaraz1080 best comment so far.

I like your work though. Thanks for sharing the knowledge

@@cervezaway7049 7th Century Arabs would beg to differ.

@Lionel Proctor that's because Christians today don't have the original words as spoken by Jesus (peace be upon him). The earliest scriptures are in Greek which was not the language of the Israelites. Which is why you have numerous contradictions in the bible, such as 2 completely different accounts of how judas died.

😂😂😂

@Lionel Proctor oh so on one hand he gave money back church and hung himself and on the other hand he used the money to purchase a field and fell with his insides gushing out. These are 2 completely different versions of how he died, one is obviously wrong. So how is it not a contradiction, and the bible is full of them unfortunately. Also how Christians follow the same gospels but have completely different creeds for Catholics don't consider anyone who follows the trinity as being Christian and vice versa. It is well known that the Greek Bible was written by people who never ever met Jesus. The aramaic bibles in Jerusalem today were translated from the Greek Bible, there are no scriptures from anyone who was present at the time of Jesus.

Islam has no originality like their book of Quran which was copied from Old and New testament. Muslims cannot tell you who was the author of Quran because their fake prophet Mohammed was illiterate 😢

how do you know, that bible content was updated?

That's nice to hear that. As a muslim, I'm glad people are willing to learn about islam and develop their own view on it. And ignore the negative view that was spread in recent years.

Yes, and there is a whole Chapter named after Merry, mother of Jesus. I am sorry your media and education hides alot of facts about Islam for years

Welcome brother, there is no compulsion in religion. Whoever seeks guidance sincerely will be guided. My best wishes to you

@@qaisjamal ... Btw, the third chapter of Quran Aal Imraan mostly deals with Jesus AS & his relatives. Imraan is the father of Mariam AS (Virgin Mary)

Keep on learning about Islam brother!! 👍🏼👍🏼

نور الله وجهك

@@methree3821 ربي يهديه والله اني حبيته ماهو عشان موقفه تجاه الإسلام لكن لأجل شغفه للبحث عن الحق

No, its just a lamp over his nobel bald head 😂 I love brother Paul for Allah's sake.

Hahahahah ur just an enthusiastic bro, I am afraid Paul should work harder to be thankful and a true believer.

Ur funny

Although orientialist say that Quran has uninspired, mythical stories and legends.. We believe its the word of Allah (SWT)

@@abuhamidal-ghazali5035 orientalists are forefront men for empires

@@Q8ijin don't forget that we are also called to set up a caliphate

Mohammad killed people, had a child bride, tortured people, and took to "wife" a woman whose husband he killed. Can you seriously believe that Mohammad is the last and final prophet of God? Does anyone have a son whom they want to grow up and then go on to killing people, having a child bride, and torturing people? Murder, raping, and torturing are what we as humanity need to be saved from. Mohammad was a sinner who needed a Savior. Islam shows what a terrible state the world is in- that a large group of people think a person like Mohammad is the answer to life's troubles. Read the Sermon on the Mount in the Gospel of Matthew chapters 5 through 7 and you will see who the true answer is.

@@matthewn2559 ok mister brainwashed from cp and others.

I love paul's voice too even i need to read the subtitles to understand the video lol

right.mashaa Allah 😇

@@fedesetrtatio1 The one who did this syncretism of old testament, rabbinical litterature, pagan belives and gnostic scriptures should have been a great educated erudite who spent his life reading books and learning from grand masters. Oh wait. Someone is telling me in the ear that in fact the person who did this syncretism is an illiterate sheep herder living in the desert.

@@fedesetrtatio1 Yes they wrote the Quran in the 9th century then slew the Jabberwocky and went on to save Narnia.

@@fedesetrtatio1 Glad to make you happy. Have a good day sir

Just to clarify: 2 Samuel 11: David impregnated his neighbors wife before conspiring to kill the husband Genesis 19:1-11-Lot lets his daughters get gang raped Genesis 19:30-38: Lot gets drunk and has sex with his daughters in a cave 2 Peter 2:7-8 God says Lot is righteous Genesis 9:21 Noah got drunk and naked in his tent.

@@fedesetrtatio1 The point is Christian prophets are supposed to be holy righteous men chosen by God to guide mankind. If you admit that the prophets were horrible people, then you also admit that “God” made numerous mistakes. But you have another major issue with Paul: The Bible was first WRITTEN by ONE man (Paul) a SIGNIFICANT time (20 years) after Jesus “death” ie a NON-EYEWITNESS. Paul’s’ only claim to authority is a story he told that he met Jesus on the road to Damascus. There is no other source to confirm his story so his word is all that supports it. He claims In Galatians 1:11-12, that he received divine revelation from Jesus. This means all of Paul’s writings must be free from error, otherwise he lied and did not meet nor was inspired by Jesus. Furthermore, Paul made a false prophecy: 1 Corinthians 15:51-52 states not everyone in his time will die before the end of the world and return of Jesus. This is a false prophecy because the world is still alive. Conclusion: Paul was a liar and the origin of the NT was falsified. This is supported by NT Scholar C.K Barrett in first epistle to the Corinthians P. 381. C.S Lewis states about a similar world ending prophecy in Mark 13:30 that it is “the most embarrassing verse in the Bible” in The worlds last night and other essays, P.97. Christians will say this prophecy is false if we understand it literally. If we understood it figuratively then it can work with impacting future people. However if we look at other passages, we can confirm Paul meant his prophecy literally. 1 Corinthians 7:28-31 clearly tells people at the time of Paul to live as if immediate destruction is coming. He used the words “from now on”, “time is short”, and the “world is passing away”. In this verse, Paul urges people to be celibate, emotionless, and ascetic. It makes no sense for Paul to think people ought to behave this way and thrive for 2000 years especially when told to be celibate under the assumption the end of the world would happen in that lifetime. Deuteronomy 18:22 states that if a prophecy did not come true spoken in the name of the Lord, it did not come from the Lord. This shows that Paul did not speak truthful and was not inspired by God. Therefore-Paul was a false apostle. Furthermore, Paul misquoted scripture: Deuteronomy 30:14 states to obey the law. Paul quotes the first quarter of the verse here yet abrogated the obedience command in Romans 10:8-10. So Paul is preaching the exact opposite of what the OT states. Paul is pushing only for salvation via faith but the OT makes it clear that works is extremely important. Another clear contradiction. Furthermore, Paul misinterpreted scripture: Another of Paul’s core teachings stress that all God’s covenantal promises to Abraham were fulfilled by the coming of Jesus. “The promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. Scripture does not say “and to seeds,” meaning many people, but “and to your seed,” meaning one person, who is Christ.” (Galatians 3:16.) Here, Paul is making the argument that god’s promise to Abraham did not speak of seeds in the plural but rather seed in the singular and concludes the single seed is a reference to just one man (Jesus). Genesis 17:19 used the Hebrew word for seed “Zera” which serves as a collective noun that can be used to refer to one or multiple descendants. It depends on the context of the scripture. Similar to the English word sheep which can refer to one or many sheep. So now the question is, how do we know if the context is different and Genesis is talking about one or multiple seeds? In Genesis 13:16, God promised here that Abraham would be blessed with a multitude of descendants likening the “seed” to the dust of the earth. Therefore the correct context of the seed is not singular as Paul incorrectly interpreted it but plural. Furthermore, Paul used wrong scripture: Paul taught that the nation of Israel will be saved from its sins via Jesus. (Romans 11:26). Paul quoted this from the Old Testament book of Isaiah 59:20. There is a clear mismatch here: In Romans, Paul states the savior will remove sin from Israel: “Godlessness away from Jacob”. Isaiah however states the savior will come to Israel after repentance from sin. So why the confusion? Paul seems to have been quoting from the Septuagint. (Isaiah 59:20). Paul’s quote in Romans aligns closely to the Greek Septuagint. However, there are in fact, two variant readings of the Old Testament. There is the Hebrew, and there is also the Greek Septuagint that Paul clearly quotes from in Romans. There is powerful evidence that the Greek Septuagint contains a later reading due to the Dead Sea scrolls which serve as the oldest surviving manuscripts for the Old Testament support the reading that is found in the Hebrew Scriptures. This means when Paul decided to quote from the Greek Septuagint, he unknowingly used the later incorrect reading. Clearly, “God” would not have inspired him to make this mistake. Furthermore, Paul distorted scripture: Paul argued that nobody can attain righteousness through the works of the Mosaic law. (Romans 3:10-20). Here, Paul quotes 6 separate passages from the Old Testament books of Psalms and Isaiah. The first 3 verses are from Psalm 14:2-3, the next 2 are from Psalm 5:9, the next 1 is from Psalm 140:3, the next 1 is from Psalm 10:7, the next 1 is from Isaiah 59:7-8, the next 1 is from Psalm 36:1. Paul strung these passages together to appear as one quote. Looking at Paul’s quotation of Psalm 14:2-3 in Romans 3:10-20, we see in the original passage in Psalm 14:1-5, it’s talking about those who say “there is no God”. These are the same people said to “do no good”. Such evil doers are then contrasted with a second group of people referred to as “my people” who are said to be the company of the righteous. Paul seems to have distorted this passage. It does NOT say as Paul quotes it “that no human being is righteous, not even one”, rather it says, that those who deny god are not righteous. Furthermore, Paul employs scriptural contradiction: Paul gave a reason as to why God revealed the law to Moses and the Israelites in (Romans 3:19). According to Paul, the law was reveled to make us realize that it is impossible to keep and that we are all guilty before god. If we go back to the Old Testament regarding what God has to say about the law we will find that God says the law is “not too difficult for you or beyond your reach….” (Deuteronomy 30:11-14). This is the complete opposite of what Paul claimed in Romans 3:19. Moreover, Paul has extremely negative things to say about the law. He called it a curse in Galatians 3:10 and also called his last efforts of keeping the law as “garbage” in Philippians 3:5-8. This negative criticism is at odds with what the Old Testament teaches as made apparent in Deuteronomy 30:16. This passage from Deuteronomy states that the law will allow one to live and increase and will be blessed. Paul’s teaching clearly contradict the Old Testament teachings on many aspects here in opposition to the God that inspired the Old Testament. Furthermore, Paul utilizes deception: The Bible says that towards the end of his ministerial career, Paul visited Jerusalem which was home to 1000’s of Christians who obeyed the law of Moses. In fact, senior Christians directly confronted Paul on rumors he was preaching against the law of Moses. We see this in Acts 21:18-21. Now we notice if Paul was truly a genuine apostle, we should be expecting him to be forthcoming about his true beliefs and teachings. If we see how Paul act in reality, we see a completely hypocritical story. We see this in Acts 21:22-26 in which the senior Christians in Jerusalem commanded Paul to undergo a public head shaving ritual that was derived from the law of Moses. Here, Paul submissively complied with their command effectively denying the rumors that he preached against the law of Moses. In the aforementioned point, we see Paul’s extreme negative reaction to the law of Moses (calling it a curse and efforts to obey it as garbage). Therefore, by conducting himself in the manner of obeying the head shaving command from the Old Testament, yet enacting clear animosity and opposition to it, Paul reveals his true nature of being a 2-faces hypocrite as he showed one side to the senior Christians with his behavior and another side in his writings. Paul states that Jews are equal to non Jews in Galatians 3:27-28 and are not bound to keep any of the Mosiac laws so that they can serve in the way of the spirit in Romans 7:6. Here, we can see very clearly Paul taught the exact things he was accused of and deceptively denied them regardless. Conclusion: Via Paul’s own writings in Romans, Galatians, Philippians, 1 Corinthians, Acts… we find a plethora of red flags including: False prophecies Misquotations Misinterpretations Wrong scriptures Distortion Contradictions Deception Not only does this solidify the fact that Paul was not a trustworthy figure, this also shows the Bible has been infected by his writings with over half of its books being attributed to him. So when one reads the Bible to learn about Jesus, they are using the lens of Paul who has been proven to be an unreliable source. This only adds on to the fact, Paul was never with Jesus and wrote 20 years after Jesus further solidifying unreliability and inauthenticity. ***If Paul never existed, what would Christians believe? The Quran was COMPILED (not written) ONE year after the prophets death by MULTIPLE men who were WITH him (eye witness) and were MEMORIZERS of the Quran (Abu Bakr, Zaid Ibn Thabit, Abdur Rahman, etc.)

👏

Although orientialist say that Quran has uninspired, mythical stories and legends.. We believe its the word of Allah (SWT)

Jesus is alive

@@cervezaway7049 call on him in your time of need ....just try it he's waiting for you ...

@@cervezaway7049 have faith... He is soon going to come... Very soon.. lots of prophecies have been fulfilled.. it seems we are the end

I hope so too

I don’t know how it blew up 💣

@@BloggingTheology because those hearts that seek for the truth they ll also look for you (in more knowledge way).thank you

@Jack Wiliam move on from this attitude to be able to accept guidance from Allah.

You copyright the bible

Good point indeed

Amazing masya Allah

@Lionel Proctor The writer of the Bible was ignorant of the fact that during the earlier dynasty, at time of Josef, the Egyptians did not call their ruler as “Pharaoh “ but rather as “King”. In the Quran he is correctly referred as King and not as Pharaoh. During the time of Moses, he is correctly called the Pharaoh. It is obvious if the Quran was copied from the Bible, it would have also copied this mistake. This is just one example of the many mistakes in Bible, but corrected in the Quran.

@Lionel Proctor Brother you’ve misunderstood your own religion. What about Abraham and all the other prophets. Did Moses copy from Abraham or any other prophet before him? Did Jesus copy from a Moses when he obeyed the law? “He who breaks the least bit of the law shall not be of the Kingdom”. He also said “think not that I have come to do away with the law of the prophets, but I have come to enhance strengthen that”. Mohammed preached the same message. He preached like all the other prophets “One God”. No mythology , no son, no daughter, no father or mother. Just One God. You choose to follow Paul, wha had never met Jesus in his life. Paul who preached a religion opposite of Jesus and all the other prophets. You are not even circumcised. You eat Swine, that has been forbidden in all the scriptures. Jesus would never eat swine. You worship three gods and call it One. You worship Jesus, who is a creature himself. You worship his mother, you worship the cross. When the Bible says clearly “Do not make images”. You worship idols.

@Lionel Proctor Christians have always treated the Jewish Nation with contempt in the past. Only in recent times they now come to champion the Israeli Zionism so much so that they completely ignore the cruelty mated out by these Zionists onto the Palestinian people, the original people of Palestine and what is now called Israel. No Christian would claim the Jews were the chosen people of God only a hundred years ago. But the Quran has actually stated this in it’s pages. The Jews have always found sanctuary in Islamic lands. My point is that: Christianity has always been changing its own theology. From Jew haters they’ve become Jew lovers. From worshipping the One True God they changed to three from the fourth century onwards. How can they forsake the teachings of all the Prophets before Jesus and start not following the Law? “The Law is a curse” said Paul. Jesus said!!! “Many will come to me on that day saying “Lord Lord, did we not do all good works in your name? “ and I will say “Begone, for I do not know you” He will be referring to those who call themselves Christians, those who call Jesus Lord

too much

Although orientialist say that Quran has uninspired, mythical stories and legends.. We believe its the word of Allah (SWT)

What do you mean by this?

@@ConsideringPhlebas Did you read the Bible version of Noah?

@@SchuelerCool Are you referring to 'world flood' versus 'local flood' idea?

@@ConsideringPhlebas I would go first with the date. When was the the flood happens according to Bible?

Thanks and welcome

Good points, except scholars of Islam all differ on whether it was Ishaq or Ishmael was the sacrificed son :P

@@servantofgod1374 scholars of Islam are not Islam and not a divine source. We respect them but they are wrong in this matter. Islam is the Holy Quran the words of God not the word of scholars. Mention too, in the Quran, the story of *Ishmael. He was true to his promise* , a messenger and a prophet. (19:54) And remember *Ishmael, Idris, and Dhu’l-Kifl: they were all steadfast* . (21:85) When the boy was old enough to work with his father, Abraham said, ‘My son, I have seen myself sacrificing you in a dream. What do you think?’ He said, ‘Father, do as you are commanded and, God willing, *you will find me steadfast* .’ (37:102) *Conclusion:* There is no mention of (steadfast) word linked to (Isaac) in all of the Holy Quran verses. There is also the context of chapter 37:85-113 mentions that Isaac news was after the offering. There is also the fact the news of Isaac included the news of Jacob altogether at once in chapter 11:71. So, it can't be asking to offer Isaac and Abraham received a promise that Isaac will have a son called Jacob. Finally: It's a weak test to kill your second born child if you're old and you have another child. The test is much harder when you're old and asked to offer your only son. *Another View is in the Bible:* It says "your only son" in Genesis 22:2, 12, 16 ESV. And God Himself said "Ishmael is also your son" in Genesis 21:13 EASY. So, "your only son" statement cannot occur except if the second one wasn't born yet.

@@HD13POWER Mate, you literally used the same set of arguments that Ibn Kathir and others used. Those who believe Ishaq was the one to be sacrificed and yes, there was even a point in history where some scholars claimed there was consensus for this belief have their arguments too. Some of the sahabah like Umar bin al-Khattab, Ali and others believed it was Ishaq too. Are you now going to claim they didn't know the Qur'an?

@@servantofgod1374 Yes, they are wrong in this matter. I don't think you believe that Isaac and Ishmael were both the offerings? One opinion is true and the other is false and there is no doubt about that. They did ijtihad and maybe Israelites stories affected their judgment but it's clear that Ishmael was the offering in the Holy Quran. His name means "He heard God".

@@HD13POWER You're saying they were affected by Bani Isra'il but you're literally saying his name means what you said it does. Brother where from the Qur'an or any hadith can you prove his name means that? Imam al-Tabari and the biggest of scholars who explained the Qur'an believed it was Ishaq, you think they didn't know the Qur'an? There is a difference of opinion on this, end of. Nobody before Ibn Taymiyyah ever said that the other side were sympathetic towards it being Ishaq because of Bani Israil, infact countless scholars said there is agreement amongst them that it is Ishaq. Watch Yasir Qadhi's video on this and you will see him explain this differing in thorough detail.

Wow thanks!

And for sure you are in my duaa for rest of my life.. thanks for saving my drowning emaan...

The Quran gets the Trinity wrong, mentioning Jesus and Mary and not mentioning the Holy Spirit, because the false Angel Jibril was trying to steal the identity of the Holy Spirit and create Islamic Jesus (Isa). Three Quranic verses may directly refer to this doctrine.4:171, 5:73, and 5:116-118. So... Allah got it wrong because false Angel Jibril was masquerading as the Holy Spirit for Islamic Theology, that is why Jibril then created a false Jesus that was not divine or crucified in the Quran. Jibril (Demon) , Messenger of Allah, tells Muhammad to take 6 year old Aisha and marry her, and Muhammad in his lust for a child totally overrules Abu Bakr's Objection to marriage! Aisha reported: Gabriel came to the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, with her image on a green, silken cloth and he said, “Verily, THIS is your wife in this world and in the Hereafter.” Source: Sunan al-Tirmidhī 3880. Grade: Sahih (authentic) according to Al-Albani. Narrated Hisham's father: Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married 'Aisha when she was a girl of SIX years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old. Source: bukhari 5: 58 236 Muhammad was over 50 WHEN HE MARRIED A SIX YEAR OLD. In addition Sahih Bukhari 1:1:3 states that Waraqa said the Angel Jibril Muhammad saw was the same Moses saw, but the angel Moses saw, NEVER identified itself as Gabriel to Moses in the Torah, EVER! Muslim theologians also falsely try to make Muhammad the Comforter (The Holy Spirit) from John 14 v 15-17 and v 25-26, as well as John 15 v 26, John 16 v 7-8 and John 16 13-15. Muhammad could not point to a single Biblical scripture he could find himself in, unlike Jesus, and Islamic thought denies the Father and The Son... 1 John 2:22‭-‬23: Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also. Secondly, Allah has NEVER come to earth and ever proven he can live above sin, so he is nothing but false in proving he himself can live above sin and granted Muhammad to marry Zaid's wife when Jesus says we should not divorce and remarry in the Bible. Matthew 19 v 9. Thirdly, neither Muhammad or Islamic Jesus ever rose from the grave to prove the resurrection and eternal life and Allah could not make this happen as he has no power over death, Allah and Jibril are just false demons. Why Muhammad is a false prophet/not a prophet of Yahweh, The God of Abraham and The Bible? There is no promise of salvation through Ishmael's lineage, 'hence him being cast out after mocking Isaac in Genesis and going to the Zam Zam well in the first place!' There is NOT a single claimed prophet from the lineage of Ishmael in the Bible, and until Muhammad's false claim 500 years after Christ had resurrected, and all the disciples had passed away completing the canon. Paul tells you if an angel brings another gospel to you contradictory (such as Jibril supposedly brought to Muhammad in a cave), in which Christ never died on a cross or was resurrected let him be accursed: Galatians 1:8 KJV But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. Next.... In Sahih Bukhari 4480, Jibril is stated to be the enemy of the Jews and makes a scientific error when stating why a child will resemble one parent more than another. Science has shown that we are more likely to look like our Fathers than mothers and there is no scientific validity to the notion that which ever parent discharges first the child will look more like this parent. Narrated Anas: `Abdullah bin Salam heard the news of the arrival of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) (at Medina) while he was on a farm collecting its fruits. So he came to the Prophet (ﷺ) and said, "I will ask you about three things which nobody knows unless he be a prophet. Firstly, what is the first portent of the Hour? What is the first meal of the people of Paradise? And what makes a baby look like its father or mother?'. The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "Just now Gabriel has informed me about that." `Abdullah said, "Gabriel?" The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "Yes." `Abdullah said, "He, among the angels is the enemy of the Jews." On that the Prophet (ﷺ) recited this Holy Verse:-- "Whoever is an enemy to Gabriel (let him die in his fury!) for he has brought it (i.e. Qur'an) down to your heart by Allah's permission." (2.97) Then he added, "As for the first portent of the Hour, it will be a fire that will collect the people from the East to West. And as for the first meal of the people of Paradise, it will be the caudite (i.e. extra) lobe of the fish liver. And if a man's discharge proceeded that of the woman, then the child resembles the father, and if the woman's discharge proceeded that of the man, then the child resembles the mother." John 4 v 22, additionally says salvation is of the Jews, NOT the Ishmaelites! Jesus, as the son of God, and as God in John 1 v 1, is who we are saved by, Acts 4:10‭-12 KJV: Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God RAISED from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole. Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved. Leviticus 17 v 11, and Hebrews 9 v 22, let you know there is no forgiveness without bloodshed for sin atonement but Islamic Doctrine says no sin atonement is needed and Christ never died on the cross, which is a lie. Psalms 147 v 19‭-‬20, shows the Lord only gives his statutes and judgements unto Israelites (which would include Paul and The Apostles) only, being able to give laws, and doctrine (including for salvation) unto Gentiles, as in Acts ch 10 and Acts ch 15, NOT to Muhammad! Ishmaelites like Muhammad have no entitlement or validity in contradictory revelation (such as on atonement), and God passes his message even unto salvation through Israelites ONLY, then unto the Gentiles: Psalms.147.19-20.KJV He sheweth his word unto Jacob, his statutes and his judgments unto Israel. He hath not dealt so with any nation: and as for his judgments, they have not KNOWN them. Galatians 3 v 8-14, shows you a crucified Christ, who later rose from death was 'the promise' to Abraham. V8: And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed. Galatians 3 V 14: That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith. John 1:29 KJV, says.. The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world. The Passover Lamb is also mysteriously missing from the Quran, despite the Quran mentioning Moses 135 times, and mentioning Moses’ confrontations with Pharaoh 27 times in the first 89 of its 114 chapters. Not even once in the exodus saga accounted in the Quran is there any mention of the Passover. The Passover Lamb is a picture of the task and process to bring us back to God, which would become complete in Jesus as our Passover Lamb. Christ was crucified at Passover, as an eternal sin atonement, and The Passover Lamb, this foreshadowed the shed blood of Christ for a believer's sins to seal them in the Lamb's book of life. Hebrews 9 v 27 and John 3 v 16.

@@HebrewsvJohnv we don't belive in your book, and we don't believe this is what Isa (AS) came with, why are you quoting your book...

@@k00lmoh The Koran is plagiarised from Jewish, Christian, Arab paganism, Zoroastrianism, Apocryphal/Gnostic Gospels, Protoevangelum of James (140-170)AD and the Gospel of Pseudo Matthew. a) . Q18:8-25 “Surah Al Kahf” The Companions of the Cave The entire tale was plagiarised from a Christian myth called the “Seven sleepers of Ephesus”. First recorded by Jacob of Suarag in the 5th century in Syriac, then into Latin in the 6th c/y by Gregory of Tours in his work “The Glory of the Martyrs”. The story was slightly altered by the authors of the Koran from Christians being persecuted by Romans for not following their Gods, to Muslims being persecuted for not following Pagan gods. b) The New Testament Apocrypha is a collection of “extra canonical Christian writings.” The Koran plagiarizes many tales of Jesus (like making a clay bird come alive and speaking as a new born) and Mary straight from these. I.e. Surah Al Maeda 5:110 and Surah Al E Imran 3:49. In roughly June 2021, on his show let the Quran Speak, entitled Did The Quran copy from the Infancy Gospels, says 'Historians in looking at pre historic accounts for The Quran for infancy stories of Jesus see there must have been elements and traces and stories from which the Quran developed from,' sadly he said "Muslims celebrate these stories" and shamedly Muslims 'boast of these as a source of pride'. Even worse though is that Shabir Ally then goes onto say, 'is that even if you say from a historical perspective there is a connection between this and that Allah only guided Muhammad (in plagirizing from these non canonical absurd sources) to retain only that for The Quran which is compatible for Islamic theology, so stealing from the core but adapting the rest. c) The Korans “heaven” is plagiarised from a cycle of Christian Hymns called “Hymns of Paradise” written in the 4th c/y by St. Ephrem of Syria, 300 years before the time of Mohamed.i.e Q76 (Al Insaan) , Q77 (Al Mursalaat) , Q 78 ( Al Naba) , Q 83 ( Al Tatfeef) d) The Story of Solomon and Bathsheba: Q 27: 17-44. This exact tale comes from an earlier Jewish story from the “Second Targum of Esther” , “Targum Sheni” e) Abraham Being delivered from the Fire: Q 2:260 is the same as “Midrash Genesis Rabba” from the 5th c/y. Genesis 15:7, but with an interesting twist. When originally translating this story from Hebrew to Aramaic, which says Abraham was brought from” Ur of the Chaldeans”, Jonathan Ben Uzziel in his Targum wrongly rendered the Babylonian word “Ur” , which means “City” into the Aramaic word “fire”. , confusing it with the Hebrew word “Or” meaning light or fire. The original story still found its way into the Koran without Allah spotting this error. Note: Nimrod did not live at same time as Abraham. (5000-4500) BC Q21:50/70+ Q37:95 f) The Quran maintains that Jesus was not actually crucified and did not die on the cross. Despite these views and no eyewitness accounts, most modern scholars have maintained that the Crucifixion of Jesus is indisputable. The view that Jesus only appeared to be crucified and did not actually die predates Islam, and is found in several apocryphal/gnostic gospels such as The Second Treatise of The Great Seth, the teachings of Basilides, The Gospel of Matthias and The Coptic Apocalypse of Peter. Ibn ‘Abbas (d.68/687) a paternal cousin of Muhammad and esteemed by many Muslims as the “father of Quran commentary” and “the Ocean [of knowledge]” commented on Quran 4:157-158, that they slew Tatianos, a Roman soldier instead of Jesus. Ibn Kathir, follows traditions which suggest that a crucifixion did occur, but not with Jesus. After the event, Ibn Kathir reports the people were divided into three groups following three different narratives; The Jacobites believing 'God remained with us as long as He willed and then He ascended to Heaven;' The Nestorians believing 'The son of God was with us as long as he willed until God raised him to heaven;' and the third group of Christians who believing; 'The servant and messenger of God, Jesus, remained with us as long as God willed until God raised him to himself. Ibn Ishaq stated: 'that Jesus was replaced by someone named Sergius, while secondly reporting an account of Jesus' tomb being located at Medina.' Al-Masudi, reported the death of Christ under Tiberius. Tabari, divided the early reports regarding Jesus crucifixion into two groups. According to the first, one of Jesus disciples volunteers to take the form of his master and is crucified. According to the other, the Jew mistakenly carried only an empty resemblance to the cross. Al-Tabari also records an interpretation transmitted from Ibn Ishaq Bishr: "God caused Jesus to die for seven hours". Ibn al-Athir forwarded the report that it was Judas, the betrayer, while also mentioning the possibility it was a man named Natlianus. 10th and 11th-century Ismaili Shia scholars Ja'far ibn Mansur al-Yaman, Abu Hatim Ahmad ibn Hamdan al-Razi, Abu Yaqub al-Sijistani, Mu'ayyad fi'l-Din al-Shirazi and the group Ikhwan al-Safa affirm the historicity of the crucifixion, reporting Jesus was crucified and not substituted by another man as maintained by many other popular Qur'anic commentators and Tafsir. Shabir Ally, Muslim Apologist states: ‘I have followed the thinking of many who feel that it is not necessary to have the belief that someone else was substituted for Jesus. I distinguish between two meanings of crucifixion. One means simply “to hang on a cross”, but I believe the word crucifixion as used in the crucifixion as used in the Koran means to “kill a person by that means”. Shabir Ally in effect, admits that Jesus was put on the cross, but that he did not die on the cross, and therefore the koranic and biblical accounts are, to some degree, in harmony. He goes on to support his contention, saying: ‘There is a subtext, which points to the fact that Jesus could not be verified to have died on the cross. He may very well have been taken down while still alive.’ Shabir Ally points out that Jesus wasn’t on the cross for very long, whereas crucifixion normally took days to kill a man, noting Pilate’s astonishment that Jesus was apparently dead before nightfall. In this respect, Ally subscribes to the ‘swoon’ theory of the crucifixion: that Jesus passed out on the cross, but later revived. So, after years of denying plagiarism by the Koran, Dr Shabir Ally , one of Islam’s foremost debaters now admits to plagiarism giving the laughable explanation that “Allah wanted to convey his final message by using stories already familiar to us,” mistakes and all. Hebrews 9 v 27 and John 3 v 16.

I’m not a scholar so my opinions are just my feelings.

@@BloggingTheology respect to you sir ! Not many speakers (even arab) are aware of the fact that opinions in islam must come from people with the status of at least a well known scholar. Maybe you may talk about it in a future video ?

@@BloggingTheology Thank u Sir for your statement..

If only Muslims could be aware of that fact.. it is all about revelation not their own points of view ! We should learn only from trustworthy scholars. As Ibn Seereen says: "The knowledge (of hadith a d in the same manner all other religious subjects) are included in the deen. Therefore before acquiring knowledge, be aware from whom knowledge is acquired".

@@fedesetrtatio1 how ? Can u explain ?

@@rickastley5321 Bible New testament is 600 years older than quran , it has copied many prophecies .

Welcome aboard

Just a token appreciation .. I will not skip any advertisements on your channel

Thank you!

Salam from London

@@scoops2382 Yes, it's full of baseless stories like the bible. All respect to Ireland; would love to visit it one day.

@@nho2x113 We know all the dynasties. Where did you get this percentage from? How do you say 30% if you don't know what 100% is?

Anything to make yourself feel better 😂

Glad you enjoyed it

Hieroglyphs?

@@nho2x113 Check it out

@Hamza Akram kzfaq.info/get/bejne/j6mCa9iFupOVZaM.html

@Hamza Akram you expected me to post you documents? Here of all places?

@Hamza Akram well you can find that in books that are hundreds of pages long. However you'd have to pay for it.

Glad it was helpful!

True a better mic would be nice. I can’t hear him when I’m at the gym.

Let's buy him a propher Mic setup.. But I don't know his address

or you can use the subtitles . easy

Use headphones.

Are u kidding there are lot of human attributes given to Allah.

Interesting

If you understand arabic i have a beautiful video for you from a palestenian cheikh who explain the importance of jeruselam.

@@marsolo1193 send it to me brother

most, yes

"Deaf, dumb and blind. So they will not return" (Quran 2:18)

Great

This shows that you haven't read the bible in context and your statements are mere copy and paste arguments.

@@iamanazarene9046 I'm sorry to disappoint you. Not only i read it but i read the apocryphal scriptures too and some others texts about it. For the Coran i almost memorised it. And so you remind me another difference : The hole coran is easy to memorise. There are millions who did it all around the word. Can you say the same for the Bible or make it simple for the new testament ?!

@@chooba7948 That's good to know you have memorised the Quran. Well done! I would encourage you to memorise the Torah and the Gospels. It'll help you to understand everything context.

@@iamanazarene9046 Your are the Christian here so it's on you to memorize your books. I told you it's clearly impossible to memorize all the Bible. I read about pastor Andy Davis who memorized about 42 books but he can't remember the old books memorized. I'am not judging here i'am just noticing differences. There is explanations of this difference in momorization. But the subject here is that the Coran is not copied from the Bible. Even the stories of the prophets are clairely different in large parts. It's not about understanding the Bible or it's context.

I did not know that.

the subtitles are available already brother

How is it undeniable? Mohammed lived hundreds of years after Jesus, in an area near to Palestine, and spoke a related language.

🤫don't degrade Bible There is verse called there will be more fake prophets and u should not take care of them So many books may come 😜but truth is truth 😜 The one who believe 🤗 will be shined Hint: no offence 🙏🤗

@@wandamaximoff9885 The number one fake person in the history of Christianity is Paul, and then Early Church fathers.

1. The Bible was revealed to the people of that era. 2. The current Bible has been currepted.

@@missabmv2614 I don't think God will let his message be corrupted.

@@jhondumaop1311 Allah promised to preserve the Quran because it was the final revelation.

@@missabmv2614 1, Which year was Bible contradicted ? 2, Who contradicted the Bible ? 3, If Bible were contradicted then were is the real Bible. People who says Bible is contradicted can never answer these questions.

@@missabmv2614 then where is the real Bible, you can never say Bible is corrupted if you didn't show the incorrupted Bible .

Are you a christian?

I see another possible copy

I don't see the issue here? There are no contradictions.

@@ebrahimadel4468 But I see why you don't see the issue here. And I did not include any koran contradictions in my comment. only substantive similarities.