@manuellubian5709 Kilgallen was needing to go down to N.O. in order to replenish her stock of pills and booze which she felt was getting low. Turns out she had enough after all.

@@stddisclaimer8020 Totally unnecessary comment. By all accounts she wasn't a 'pill popper' or a 'boozer'.

@@manuellubian5709 Kilgallen was one screwed-up dame. She had insecurities galore, was married to a closet gay man, indulged in a long term extra-marital affair, drank and used drugs, excessively on occasion; and was essentially a quite unhappy individual. Like many showbiz/gossip columnists she could be mean spirited and vindictive. Her colleagues from "What's My Line?" stopped having personal conversations with her or in front of her after things they said ended up in print. If you have no respect for the concept of, "off the record," then you will stop being liked or trusted. She got lucky at an early age but fame & sorrow ate her alive, ruining her happiness, and self-administered drugs and alcohol finally did her in.

@@stddisclaimer8020 So, you really believe she decided to 'unalive' herself right before she was getting ready to go to a school meeting for her kids?

@@manuellubian5709 Kilgallen succumbed to a fatal barbiturate/alcohol interaction, either suicidal or (most likely) accidental. There was no evidence of a break-in, violence, or foul play. The incident was twice investigated: once by the NYPD and then the HSCA; and the case closed. In nearly 58 years, no one has been able to adduce solid evidence that would lend credence to any different conclusion.

Lee shot at JFK. We don't know if he actually hit him. If you think Oswald was innocent then you only believe what you want to believe. You don't believe he shot tippit either do you. Do you even believe he was arrested in the theater with a pistol he attempted to shoot at an officer who manages to stop the hammer with his hand? You're a fool

I heard he still leaves cookies and milk out for Santa at Xmas as well, after all the evidence that’s came to light I question anyone who believes in the lone gunman theory

What a bought and paid for CIA, disinformation agent! He must have no integrity whatsoever in light of all the evidence for a massive conspiracy and for the use of Oswald as a patsy!!!

@@stevendodd1987 Then you must tell us about the "unofficial" story; you know, the "other" gunmen version. Fully delineate it, and describe the methodology employed. Name the alternate assassin, then tell us what became of him. Identify the weapon used, and explain what happened to it and to the bullet(s) or fragments therefrom. Then go write an 800+ page report based on your compelling evidence. But how come in 59+ years, neither you nor anyone of your disreputable ilk has been able to produce Page One?

@hitchkick2795 You must believe in the" fairy tale” of a vast n' complex Kennedy conspiracy necessarily involving scores of police, military personnel, FBI, Secret Service, doctors, witnesses, x-ray technicians, Oswald family members, ballistics experts, shoe store clerks, reporters, investigative commissions & Congressional committees,-- a plot about which after 59+ years, not one of so many conspiring souls has come forth to spill even a single word. Of course there's not a speck of credible evidence much less proof of any such thing. Yet, that's what you want to believe?

Would that be a burgundy, or closer to plum?

The heck it has. All bullet and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind. Kennedy is clearly seen to suffer a massive exit wound exploding at the temple, consistent only with a shot from behind. Connally's said the shots came from behind. Autopsy shows the shots came from behind. Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos. It's utterly implausible anybody would ever assume they would frame this on a lone shooter while firing from multiple directions with different guns.

@@aaronz7056 How can the Z film possibly show that all victims were hit by the same bullet? Connally, whom you quote favourably, firmly disagreed with that idea. It was, after all, a theory that was only concocted when an earlier version broke down under the weight of new evidence. The idea that the person(s) who did the firing was/were the ones who tried to "frame" a lone shooter is a logically unwarranted assumption: remove it and the whole incident becomes much more enigmatic.

@@chrisbirmingham5132 Within 1-2 frames of Kennedy being hit, Connally's lapel pops out, his hat flips up, his shoulder is driven down and his expression violently contorts between frames as his lung is collapsed. One bullet, and from behind. In addition: Connally was demonstrably seated lower, inboard and turned sharply to his right. The victims' wounds demonstrably line up on a trajectory and track straight back to the sixth floor window. View of the entry wound on Connally's back would have been demonstrably blocked by Kennedy's body, meaning the same bullet has to have gone through both of them. Bullet recovered from the stretcher is badly crushed at the nose and flattened down one side. That condition is consistent with going through Kennedy without hitting bone, slowing and tumbling on leaving him, then broadsiding its way through Connally's ribs, as medical and forensic evidence clearly demonstrate. That bullet was matched to Oswald's rifle. "A logically unwarranted assumption..." No, it's not. If it was, you're saying multiple shooters fired at Kennedy knowing full well it would be obvious there was more than one shooter, and ergo, a conspiracy.

Nonsense. Please provide the proof that Ruby and Oswald knew each other.

Rubbish.

Are you serious? Because they don't believe in Garrison's hypotheses they are on "payroll".

Still waiting for my check.

@@andycummings-music Fred litwin is a hypocrite of huge proportions. He calls oliver stone a homophobe yet he retweets ben shapiro tweets regularly. Litwin is a right wing rainbow zionist. He's a demagogue himself. He's got an entire website dedicated to stalking oliver stone and attempting to whip up anger at oliver.

Jim Garrison said in 1967 that this was a homosexual thrill killing. Keep in mind though Jim Garrison was likely a pederast.

That's my favorite theory. The Warren Commission had to ask quite a few witnesses, "Are you homosexual?" and "Do you think he was homosexual?" because these people around Oswald had a nutty habit of inviting good looking young people they just met to stay in their homes.

The "mysterious deaths list of witnesses" is an hilarious hoax where everybody on it either had little or no connection to the case or else their causes of death were misreported to sound more "sinister."

I never understood why Marcello hired such an unreliable nutcase like Lee Harvey Oswald. Though, he did get the job done.

The music lasts 2 minutes and 13 seconds at the very beginning of the video.

Garrison said the thought the assassination was carried out by gays and masochists pulling off a "homosexual thrill killing."

a trio of Jacquameaux's

Leaving aside his mountain of demonstrable lies, Garrison "claimed" variously that ALL of the following were conspirators and accessories in murder and treason: FBI CIA Dallas PD Secret Service Lyndon Johnson Chief Justice Earl Warren entire Warren Commission staff Cuban guerrillas neo-Nazis White Russians Governor Rhodes of Ohio Governor Tieman of Nebraska Governor Ronald Reagan of California John Birch Society BOBBY Kennedy Johnny Carson NBC CBS Washington Post Los Angeles Times Newsweek NASA 13 State Regional Democratic Organization oil industry aerospace industry lawyers defending people he suspected a man who'd made inflammatory comments about JFK & been in El Paso Nov. 22 a Marine buddy of Oswald's Garrison decided was an Oswald "lookalike" [read all about it in conspiracy author David Lifton's classic article, "Is Jim Garrison Out of His Mind?"] conspiracy authors critical of him (at behest of CIA) the telephone company ("an extension of the US government") gays and masochists pulling off a "homosexual thrill killing..."

"Do your homework" where, at crackpot conspiracy sites? lol

Stone: - promotes self as crusader for truth and justice for Kennedy - lets his murderer off the hook - falsely and obscenely paints innocent people as conspirators - tells more than 80 demonstrable lies in his script Marrs: - spent years giving his middle finger to the family of a decorated police officer slain in the line of duty as he accused the man without evidence of being a conspirator so long as it suited his crackpot "theories" - made up a fake "mysterious deaths list of witnesses" where everybody on it either had little or no connection to the case or else he misreported their causes of death to sound more "sinister" - gave us the "multiple clones of Oswald running around Dallas" idiocy - proved flying saucers are real...

In that case we look forward to you explaining what really did happen.

@@aaronz7056 what happened is just like trump , 3 different hit teams and non of them Oswald , from the building next to book depository, from in front by the under pass bullet left a hole in the windshield ( goggle it there pictures ) and final blow head shot behind fence grassy knoll . 100s of books Jim Mars is good and Mark Lane lecture at UCLA i believe 1964 or 66 Is even better

@@knickyak7268 ... and there's zero evidence for any of that crap. None. So somebody desperate to frame this on Oswald stood in front of the limo, fired through glass (!), and shot Kennedy in the face... Yeah, that's brilliant. Since you are championing Marrs and Lane, here are their records: Jim Marrs: - spent years giving his middle finger to the family of a decorated police officer who lost his life in the cause of his duty as he accused the man without evidence of being a conspirator in murder and treason so long as it suited his crackpot "theories," to hell with the pain his despicable words caused them - made up a phony "mysterious deaths list of witnesses" where every person on it either had little or no connection to the case or else he misreported their causes of death to sound more "sinister" (some of them weren't even dead) - came up with the "multiple Oswald clones running around Dallas" idiocy - proved flying saucers are real Mark Lane: - SOUNDLY condemned by TWO commissions for misleading them with conspiracy theories he coyly refused to back up with evidence - disgusted interview subjects with his omissions and leading questions - described by Charles Brehm as "a despicable liar" - described by John Connally himself as "evil" - packed his books with demonstrable fabrications - right-hand stooge to Rev. Jim Jones - misled the public and the authorities about what Jones was getting up to - made no attempt to warn Leo Ryan and Jackie Speier about the death trap they were visiting at Jonestown - gave top priority to running away and saving his own worthless ass while they were getting gunned down at the airstrip - subject of Bob Katz's Mother Jones expose, "Mark Lane - The Left's Leading Hearse Chaser..."

@@knickyak7268 Needless to say, there's no evidence for any of that garbage and a mountain of hard, credible and demonstrable evidence for Oswald's guilt. Let me get this straight: you've got some conspiracy framing Oswald in the Depository by standing in front of the limo, firing through glass, and shooting Kennedy in the face... In fact: All bullets and fragments ever found were matched to Oswald's rifle. Victims' reactions in Zapruder's film clearly demonstrate they are hit by the same bullet, and ergo, from behind. Kennedy is very clearly seen to suffer a massive exit wound exploding at the right temple, consistent only with a shot from behind. Connally's said the shots came from behind. Autopsy shows the shots came from behind. Parkland doctors had no particular problem with the autopsy photos. Witnesses directly under the sixth floor window firmly said the shots all came from directly overhead. Those witnesses had a clear view behind the knoll fence and would have plainly seen any gunman there. Zapruder's secretary was only yards away from the fence and heard and saw nobody there. Windshield is still in the National Archives and its only damage is a bad crack caused by a bullet fragment that also damaged the chrome plating... from the inside. As for Jim Marrs and Mark Lane, who you are championing as crusaders for truth and justice, let's review their actual records. Jim Marrs: - spent years giving his middle finger to the family of a decorated police officer who lost his life in the cause of his duty as he accused the man without evidence of being a conspirator so long as it suited his crackpot "theories," to hell with the pain his despicable words cause them - made up an hilarious "mysterious deaths list of witnesses" where everybody on it either had little or no connection to the case or else he misreported their causes of death to sound more "sinister" [some of them weren't even dead] - gave us the "multiple clones of Oswald running around Dallas" idiocy - proved flying saucers are real... Mark Lane: - soundly and publicly condemned by two commissions for misleading them with conspiracy theories he playfully refused to back up with evidence - disgusted interview subjects with his omissions and leading questions - described by Charles Brehm as "a despicable liar" - described by John Connally himself as "evil" - packed his books with demonstrable fabrications - right-hand and highly paid stooge to Rev. Jim Jones - misled the public and the authorities about what Jones was getting up to, until it was too late - made no attempt to warn Leo Ryan and Jackie Speier about the death trap they were visiting at Jonestown - while they were getting gunned down at the airstrip, Lane gave top priority to running away and saving his own worthless ass - subject of Bob Katz's Mother Jones expose, "Mark Lane - The Left's Leading Hearse Chaser..."

Needless to say, there's zero evidence for that implausible rubbish. Windshield is still in the National Archives and its only damage is a bad crack caused by a bullet fragment that also damaged the chrome plating... from the inside. As for Jim Marrs and Mark Lane, who you hail as champions for truth and justice, here are their actual records. Jim Marrs: - spent years giving his middle finger to the family of a decorated police officer who lost his life in the cause of his duty as he accused the man without evidence of being a conspirator in murder and treason so long as it suited his crackpot "theories," to hell with the pain his despicable words cause them - made up a bogus "mysterious deaths list of witnesses" where everybody on it either had little or no connection to the case or else their causes of death were misreported to sound more "sinister" - gave us the "multiple clones of Oswald running around Dallas idiocy - proved flying saucers are real... Mark Lane: - soundly and officially condemned by two commissions for misleading them with conspiracy theories he playfully refused to back up with evidence - disgusted interview subjects with his omissions and leading questions - packed his books with demonstrable fabrications - described by Charles Brehm as "a despicable liar" - described by John Connally as "evil" - right-hand stooge to Rev. Jim Jones - misled the public and the authorities regarding what Jones was getting up to until it was too late - made no attempt to warn Leo Ryan and Jackie Speier of the death trap they were visiting at Jonestown, but at least while they were getting gunned down at the airstrip Lane did an admirable job of running away and saving his own worthless ass - for more see Bob Katz's Mother Jones expose, "Mark Lane - The Left's Leading Hearse Chaser..."

They were CIA HELLO!

He did? How so?

@@djquinn11 Listen to TRUCKEN that's how

@@craigmignone2863 garrison is referenced?

Busted down on Bourbon St. Ahh Garrison, the original Slippin' Jimmy.

And Garrison lied his ass off in that interview. He later decided both NBC and Johnny Carson were part of the conspiracy. No word on whether this lunatic believed Ed McMahon was involved too...

Whether they have the release year of Garrison's book correct or not, doesn't mean what they are saying about Garrison isn't true.

@@robertweingartner2055 the release year? couldn't be further from reality if are you implying thats what was wrong with his wikipedia page, because thats where the info matters which is sometimes in correct.

@@robertweingartner2055 have you read Garrison's On the trail?

@@TheHeavensFellen Yes, i have.

@@robertweingartner2055 So, within it, there are statements which you disagree with?