spot on

Democrats literally called everyone didn't agree with them deplorables. Biden was just as divisive as Trump, and in certain area's even more.

Agreed.

If the USA give the EU their bit of NATO then the EU could have a EUTO

@@gavinmc5285 If the felon gets elected, they'll likely have to do something of that nature. If nothing else, free Europe will need reliable partners to share classified documents with, and members who will give military aid rather than trying to give away their territory to score points with Putin.

This well paid warmonger would get us into WW3. NATO couldnt win the Afghan War. They will defeat Russia😂😂😂😂 What stuff are these guys on😂😂😂😂😂 Peyote😂😂😂😂

@ slavenaljinovic America has 12 airplane carrier groups,and they cannot control the Houthis in the Red sea, but keep talking about attacking China as if that move would not immediately involve Russia, Iran and North Korea among others.

@@slavenaljinovic1162 NATO wasn't fighting in the Afghan war. Get your facts straight before you break out the laughing with tears emoticon. Some of us don't think that war is such a laughing matter.

@@djordjelezajic8435 America has no interest in attacking China (that's ridiculous). The US would probably help Taiwan defend itself against a Chinese attack (big difference) but so would Japan, South Korea, Australia and others.

@@IusedtohaveausernameIliked Yes NATO was on a picnic in Afgganistan. Yes US proxy wars have resulted in millions of dead civilians plus trillions of dolara of taxpayers money wasted. So now the same sheme in Ukraine. Who cares about the hundreds of thousands of dead. US arms sales booming. US LNG sales booming. Control ove Ukrainian minerals secured.

eh?

@@risacademics Pivotal for what. Endless American hegemony.

Hawk Wolf diplomacy

The USA is the big threat to the rest of the world..

Biden or Trump : Cracker or Biscuit

Vote Phil T. Fealty

He did piss off Trump when they were visiting Japan or South Korea. Trump immediately sent him to China to find tea leaves.

He criticized Trump on many other occasions.

He does criticize Trump..Bolton straight shooter

You're (not) supposed to be particularly nice or kind in politics

He wrote a book. "The Room Where it Happened". Reading it as we speak. Remember despite his criticism of Donald Trump, he refused to testify at White House impeachment. hearings. 50O pages of saying how important and smart he is and talks incessantly, almost obsessively, in my opinion, about North Korea and Iran. Give it a shot! I am persevering. 😉😉

With a punk like bolten , not sure ppl care😎

Probably.

Unfortunately people seem to be more interested in click bait and propaganda. People who speak realistically and logically don't get much attention. In this particular case people on the left hate Bolton because he's been on the right and people on the right hate him because he doesn't support their ridiculous nominee. I'm with Bolton and I think the majority in the country, thinking that being stuck with these 2 candidates is a disgrace.

@@jerseyshoredroneservices225 i agree 👍

Bolton has no influence any more and is irrelevant.

Presidents don't get elected to do work

NO JOHN DOES NOT HAVE ANY SUCH QUALIFICATIONS! BOLTON IS A HAS BEEN, A NEVER WAS & NEVER WILL BE!! JUST ANOTHER STUPID DUMMKOPF

Not even a dog will vote for this guy, Yale alumnus😂.

The most important subtext of NATO is currently the Kremlin

@@gavinmc5285 The Kremlin isn't a subtext. It has renewed the alliance.

Right. I wonder how John Bolton would feel if everyone around him would try to deter him all the time and at all costs.

You'd vote for WWIII.

Bolton as a strategist has zero credibility if he can't recognise that Trump/Biden is a binary decision. He outlines the drastic consequences of Trump taking the US out of NATO but ducks the implications - that he has to endorse Biden.

You obviously know nothing about russia.

And who is the druggie here? Not Bolton, of course.

😂😂😂he has what, experience? Experience in warmongering. The rest of the world is fed up with US forever wars.

Vote Dick for Terror

stop this Russian propaganda. US doesn't constantly attacks Mexico, doesn't force English language, doesn't kill Mexicans, doesn't lecture Mexicans on Nazism, etc.

The good thing is that situation in Ukraine has nothing in common with your imaginary situation. Ukraine was no where near joining NATO in 2014 and still russia robbed Ukraine of its territories. Btw, I'm from Sevastopol (Crimea), I know what I'm talking about. Btw, think why russia was ok with the Baltic states being parts of NATO for decades.

I wonder why after one million of Iraqi deaths he is still not sentenced

@@NKomarov worried about justice? Get ready to be judged for backing up russian atrocities in Ukraine, комаров.

They'd like to upgrade to sirloin

Old Europe or New Europe?

Nuclearpath

You're the first psychiatrist who's commented on this clip

Look who is talking.

The wimp that stood up to sedition do you mean?

Stop the Bolts

Sounds better than Trump.

Like Putin?

Like Janus

WORLD STAGE: NATO #postlive

*cheney

Bolton Wanderers FC

The Russian sub-Empire of Putin's regime. In times of its greatness, the Imperial Russia consisted of layers, like an "onion", due to historical development - the internal empire and the external, changing one, based on the conquest of national formations. The internal part is now the Russian "federation", the external part now consists only of Belarus, parts of Georgia and Moldova, and the situation in the Caucasus is still unclear - there are other factors there. The external empire preserved the structure of the internal part, but this is no longer the case now. Therefore, Putin's regime represents a part of the historical Russian Empire, and this is what distinguishes it from other empires. The stable structure of the Russian sub-Empire, now? What do we have - an ongoing war in Ukraine, inflation (as of 24.07.24 the official rate is 8%, Central Bank rate is 16% - a clear trend towards an increase), two financial-trade flows at the borders - dollar/euro and yuan, problems in the provinces of the internal empire (a "parade" of problems since the beginning of 2024), military expenses. Add to this a power bloc for maintaining the situation in the internal empire, which also fuels inflation, even if the war on the Ukrainian border suddenly stops. Moreover, all these factors act together and have a cumulative effect of escalating inflation to hyperinflation (around 30%), which speeds up events. So, the Kremlin may once again witness a second geopolitical catastrophe, but this time the cause will be the actions of the Kremlin itself. With hyperinflation, troops in Ukraine will die faster than they are paid, and the power structures in the sub-Empire will lose motivation to work for the metropolis when there are financial-trade flows nearby, such as the yuan. Inflation of 8% and the Central Bank rate of 16% - playing with the exchange rate and increasing empty money supply do not change anything, just like it didn't save Germany in 1918. The only way out is optimization or cessation of the war in Ukraine, reduction of military expenses after the war, and receiving inflows into the budget and investments. But on what terms is this possible? Are the borders of Ukraine in 1991 sufficient for the stability of Russia's quasi-empire in its current form? Currently, there are two financial-trade flows - the dollar/euro and the yuan. The dollar/euro is the foundation of Ukraine's resilience in the war and the basis for sanctions against the Kremlin's quasi-empire. It is closed as a possibility. Behind the dollar/euro flow are the so-called Democratic standards and institutions, with which the quasi-empire has come into conflict. Sanctions based on the dollar/euro flows have changed markets for Russia's quasi-empire, and these markets have reflected back on Russia itself. An example is the oil trade. Russia has been pushed into Asia for markets in India and China. In February 2024, there were too many oil tankers in the Indian Ocean with dumping prices. This affects the interests of the Persian Gulf, which has triggered activity from the "green genie". These events in Russia in 2024 based on "Islamic radicalism" and elsewhere can be explained. This was not happening in 2023, factually. If "these tankers" continue in the Indian Ocean, we can predict terrorist attacks in Russia and elsewhere in the fall of 2024. The financial-trade flow - the yuan, which is China, does not have Democratic standards behind it. It is part of China's mixed imperial policy. There is territorial expansion and the development of the yuan as a basis of influence and market expansion without territorial conquests. China's military program falls under the concept of Tirpitz, for expanding competitive capabilities without war. It actively operates in the Dollar/euro zone and is tied to Western markets. In other words, it is a "chameleon" that changes its "color" - methods based on the market it operates in. This financial-trade flow sets China's policy - more or less, whatever is more profitable.

A vivid example of how it acts during the war of the sub-empire and Ukraine. Supplies exist to both sides of the war, integration into economies is absent. "Yuan" likes to parasitize on the dollar/euro, but at the same time, by using its standard procedures, the dollar/euro create a symbiosis of interests with it where it is profitable. China is clearly in a state of evolution, with ideas of Xi Jinping about the middle class being just one example. The path China will choose is not yet clear. If the "yuan" is at the border of Russia, it will influence the provinces of the internal sub-empire through socio-economic connections, as the dollar/euro once influenced the whole of Ukraine through Western Ukraine. But Ukraine is a country, not an empire. For an empire, this means the emergence of separatism. The sub-empire itself used the "ruble" in Crimea and the Donbas in 2014 to start aggression, but encountered a much stronger flow of "dollar/euro" and did not make a retreat. For the Kremlin, as the center of the "federation", it is necessary that the operator of the "yuan" be the Kremlin, not processes in the province. If China does not allow the Kremlin to be the operator of the "yuan", then it clearly has plans that are not herbivorous, while there is no need to fight - the "fruit will fall into its hands" in time. There is also a question of what China wants - influence on territories or the territories themselves? The answer will be given in 2025. For China to not lose more or less in logic, it is necessary to coordinate its position in the West - the key condition is the borders of Ukraine in 1991. In addition, the "Yuan" has already established itself in Central Asia. In the end, Russia's near-imperium has problems not only on the front with Ukraine and the unavailability of the dollar/euro as a flow, but all around - "green gin" and the influence of the yuan. Simply returning to the borders of 1991 does not solve the problem. This is a trap for the imperial Russia in 2024, simply stopping the war does not give anything in the near future. From this, there are two scenarios. "Crimson endgame" - optimization of borders and expenses or exchange of interests. Returning to the borders of 1991 and allowing the Kremlin to be the operator of the "yuan". The problem of the "green gin" is solved by reducing tankers in the Indian Ocean with a reduction of military expenses. For the history of the Russian Empires, this is not the first time. Catherine II did this - she sold Alaska to avoid conflicts of interest on the American continent. While currently the near-imperium is at its maximum strength in the West in Ukraine, it can do this with greater advantage and containment of processes in the imperial structure itself. This scenario does not solve all problems, it directs events into a manageable channel and is a prerequisite for the evolution of Russia itself. The "Crimson endgame" is beneficial to everyone. Ukraine gets the borders of 1991 and development in the EU/NATO. The West gains influence over China, China gains resources, the near-imperium Russia remains within internal borders with stabilization of processes, with the possibility of evolution.

Left then right. Or right first, then left.

No Hawkers, No Traders

"You were given the choice between war and dishonour. You chose dishonour, and you will have war."

@@ad.infinitum.per.aspera Even you choose honor in the beginning, get dishonor in the end.

Can't hear you