oil deposits are past civilizations landfills that have been solar flared after resets. why you think they dumpin metals on us?

Man thanks for getting an expert on me for this.

Just ban PET bottles below 600ml and you will have a big impact in landfills and sea. If you look at sea waste, most are bottles.

I have the best solution for waste disposal. we can use a quantum recycler that disassembles anything back into its subatomic particles

for every 100 units of waste that you are recycling, China is dumping 10,000 units of garbage into the environment , and the CCP loves it because it gives the westerners something to keep their hands tied 😂

Like people?

@@maffewranglar9464 Some people in particular.

Plastics bags. . .. even ziplocks and freezer bags. Just get reusable ones literally saves you money too :/

It makes them money, so we the people need to not buy them. This is the only way to stop the production.

the three R's of sustainability: Reduce, Reuse and Recycle. They're in that order for a good reason, it's far easier to reduce and reuse than to recycle

Yes but nobody willingly reduces their lifestyles. People are by nature maximalists, go fast, get more, get better.

This doesn’t make sense. If I am recycling 100% of my waste I get the benefit of using the products and I am not adding the the waste. Whereas if I REDUCE my usage by 100% then I get none of the benefits of using it while also not adding to the waste. Clearly recycling is better than reducing.

Patrick, the basis is that part of the waste process is not just in the product’s breakdown, but also in its production. More items are still being made to be consumed, which requires a lot of raw material and energy waste to produce - just not the type of waste that people press on as heavily since it’s not something you can see as tangibly, like electrical waste (hence why NFTs are such a bad thing for the environment - the electrical usage and waste is enormous). Not to mention, recycling is not a 1:1 - a product needs to meet a high standard to still be viable for recycling. In reality, rather than one can being used to make one recycled can, it probably takes about 5 cans to make one recycled can (not to mention, back to the energy thing, the energy and resource waste of processing those cans). And, eventually, things that can no longer be recycled, and those that couldn’t be recycled to begin with, will end up in the landfills anyway. Not to mention, in our economy where recycling is currently the only emphasized function (much like you propose) our recycling systems are actually overloaded. And what they cannot effectively process in a timely manner, they’re told to turn away and let be taken to the landfill anyway. So basically, recycling is beneficial, but it comes with many gaps, especially when it’s the only proprietor used. The key with reducing is to reduce the need for those waste-heavy products to begin with, so that we’re wasting less resources to produce them to begin with, and to much more greatly reduce what ends up wasted at the end of its life cycle. Buying fewer products in plastic bottles, for example, means reducing the need to produce said bottles, and reduce the wastage it takes to process said bottles at the end of their life span. Ideally, we should also have initiatives at a corporate level to reduce this as well, either by using less waste heavy vessels in general, or (in the US at least) invest more into the use of less waste heavy and more easily recyclable plastics like PET, which are not standardized as heavily here. That also plays into a bit of the “reuse” initiative as well - reusing some of these products while you have it, but (going back to reduce) making an effort not to purchase more which needs to be reused. Instead of buying a bunch of reusable grocery bags for your grocery trips - which with the energy waste for production and how long it takes to break down accounted for would probably need to be used about 5000 times for it to make up for the energy cost of the plastic bags it’s replacing - making your own out of worn clothes or out of material you’ve already owned, to extend that material’s life cycle with further use which elongates the time before it goes into a landfill. Things like that. Much like with recycling, going out of your way to buy products for the sake of either reusing it, or making products for reuse, is contributing to the waste of producing it, so ultimately we should be pushing towards reducing first and foremost. Basically, recycling only accounts for end cycle wastage, whereas reducing accounts for wastage in a product’s entire life span. Ideally we should be reducing our usage - and corporations should be reducing production - of waste heavy products to begin with, and then we should use reuse and recycling as means to address what cannot be reduced.

@@patrick6213 you can’t recycle even most of your waste. Reduce makes sense in that if you use less you’ll generate less waste, and can easily reduce much more material than you can recycle. For example most people can reduce their consumption by 50%, but good luck recycling half of what you use.

@@patrick6213 OP didn't say it was better, they said it was the most impactful. If you reduce by 100% it's literally 0, which is more impactful then reusing repeatedly

Well, waste engineers aren't picking up leaking bags on the street during pre-dawn winters. Also garbage collectors get paid pretty good at least in NYC, not because it's such a great job but because it's difficult and not too many want to do it

Yeah... They are... But why would you want to be that person collecting trash if you could do something else, where you don't collect trash?

If your passion is helping to keep this world alive then I don't see why not.

I urged both sons to learn as much as they can as young as they can because it never gets easier. Also my job was to raise productive citizens. If they are happy being garbage man and live within their means and not being a burden to society. But with education if they change their mind they will have more options.

According to a National Geographic article, only 9% of all plastics are recycled. The remainder is either incinerated or sent to landfills.

I hear this in my town, but I tell people, it gets you into the habit, and then when the tech is ready, when the infrastructure is there, when the cost to not recycle rises above the cost to recycle we're already doing what we need to.

It's probably because those things can't be recycled

@@lettuce1626 Right, many people don't realize recycle needs to be completely cleaned and dried before turning it in. More often than not, people are just throwing their plastic trash and packaging with food still in it in a bin and calling it a day.

Most people who are adamant about recycling don't really care about the planet to begin with, they care about their own safe clean space. Not to mention the worry of the planet isn't the actual problem, it's only harming us. The planet is fine and always has been fine. The earth is 4.543 billion years old and through all of that there's been catastrophic natural disasters. Volcano eruptions, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and tornados, meteor strikes, tsunami's, things that if we had the major cities we do now back then they'd have been completely wiped out. The earth is still here. But yeah the plastic bags and styrofoam is gonna be the end of it all, mhmm. Everybody in our current lifetime worried about saving the planet will never experience a catastrophic event capable of leveling an entire state. So when you see somebody freaking out over recycling and saving the planet think if they actually care about nature and the planet or if they're just worried their living space is gonna become dirty. Cause I don't think the earth needs us to care for it, it's gonna shake us off like a bad case of fleas one day and we'll have been a small blip in the grand scheme of things.

One of those phrases in English where the position of the primary stress _really_ matters for the meaning.

This is a joke, it's totally inappropriate, cringy and weird. I'm sorry. I'm sorry I'm a horrible person. I already know this. I don't have to write this at all... But she can call me Oscar anytime.

I'm so sorry, you don't have to forgive me. I know I'm scum. My brain just couldn't let it go. I'll report myself to HR.

@@kekz0r Huh?

This video wasn't total garbage; she also talked about recycling.

Exactly, even if everyone starts recycling, that won't change anything, it's the companies waste thats got us f****d

THIS!! Because even though yes, we are able to choose what to buy and whether or not to recycle, we actually have little to no control on “reducing our carbon footprint” due to companies and manufacturers not really caring about the environment and would rather go with cheap routes for saving money purposes.

THANK YOU! Someone who understands life through a systems point of view!

Given her comments at 0:50 and 11:10 I imagine she agrees with you - it's possible the lack of focus on systemic change in the video comes more down to editing than to her actual responses to the questions.

I absolutely agree. It's like an adult giving stuff to a child and saying "here, now like it. No, you cannot substitute it. No, you cannot hand it back to me once you're done. Stay with it. Like it. Deal with it. But you can never, ever get rid of it. It lives longer than you ever will..."

You should, where do you live, under a rock? USA??

FWIW the even more zero waste version of Starbucks is to bring your own cup. I think Starbucks gives you a discount too

And if you really want a crap your pants, do you know that all aluminum cans whether it's soda or food or soup or anything else are really just plastic bottles with an aluminum coating for durability? It's still plastics you're ingesting aka cancer. Glass is always better.

Hey don't be embarrassed, it's an honest mistake and you shouldn't have to be second guessing that kind of stuff! that's on starbucks, not you now you know, and you can plan accordingly. nothing to be embarrassed by at all

I don't know what country you are in, but in the US it is problematic to even do this because what is or is not recyclable varies by town. Even whether or not you need to rinse things out varies.

Ah man I’m going back to school to get my degree and become an environmental engineer. Super excited to step into the world you’re living in!

Hey fellow environmental engineer!! ☺️

When I worked in office, there were signs of what went where because so many people were throwing coffee cups in recycling.

You guys just ship it to China anyway.

😱your so right

or Idiocracy

That was my first thought when she answered that questioned.

The whole world will never be landfills lmao. Do you realize how much space we have.....

And ready player one

Are you based in Europe or the US?

@@andreadahl441 both fall victim to this

"They’re all outdated and way over their designed capacity." - Literally every public infrastructure/service everywhere.

Civil engineer in usa, you mean. What a stupid blanklet statement.

@@tony5422 yup!

Recycling at that scale usually costs money, which means goods would be more expensive, which consumers don't want. Few companies are willing to add that to their overhead. The government doesn't seem interested in mandating it because it's bad for business which we can't have and consumers mostly only half-heartedly push for it

They must be *responsibilized*, 'cause they won't do that willingly. Plastic must be regulated (world wide preferably)

@@supernova622 places like france have government sponsored initiatives for companies to recycle, and a similar thing for grocery stores not throwing away food and their recycling rates shot up by a lot but i cant remember specifics because i learned about this in my french class last year

Not only companies, but humanity in general, we were all involved in this damage.

Just curious though, why are we as consumers not responsible, at least for some huge portion of it?

Recycling is pointless when gas-powered trucks haul them off, spewing gas fumes in the air

@@nimzi4479 yeah but you got keep one thing going while the other is still in improvement.

@@nimzi4479 improve the system a step at a time. That's what engineering is my friend. We didnt get to where we are today with any of our technology or processes by making it perfect on the first try.

@@nimzi4479 you are a certified silly head if you really believe recycling is pointless

@@epiclexi1234 the 'purpose' of recycling is to clean up the environment by re-using materials. We put more co2 producing vehicles, dirtying the air we breathe, and we put out more plastic by putting out the recycling bins.either it's pointless or we're robbing peter to pay Paul,so to speak.

I live in the U.S. and for the past few weeks I've seen our garbage truck also pick up our recyclables the past few weeks...

@@emankcin1334 the recycling truck completely skips the neighborhoods in my town 99% of the time

In Escondido, California, we are very interested in recycling and my niece works for the company that collects the "clean greens ", the trash, and another container for all recycling. Three different trash containers. It really works. My niece's company gives tours.

This is a first global problem clearly

Yay learning! 😂

It is good but has too little social momentum behind it Just look at the plastic to paper movement in straws. It's all because a turtle having a plastic straw in its nose got social attention, not because of any actual pro-environment reason.

You can see how humans are a disgraced bunch when you think it's fine to enslave the nature to keep consumption. Just stop using packaging. Use big containers... And a scale... That's all.

@@luminaspargo4630 I'm sure most people here would agree w/ your initial sentiment about our behaviors being somewhat shameful but what I was referring to is utilizing the properties of nature to accommodate a situation that will not go away. Way more reasonable than insisting everyone to just stop using packaging .. Doesn't even make sense and not a practical suggestion in the slightest.

@@angrydragonslayer People on Reddit constantly post images being angry about unnecessary plastic use, even when the material turns out to not even be plastic (such as constantly complaining about cellulose book covers as wasteful plastic use).

@@angrydragonslayer Yet despite all that kerfuffle, we still don't have a good alternative to the simple plastic straw. We don't need social movements to back what's effective, we need corporations to buy into it and pour money in to R&D. "Imagine the branding of being styrofoam free!" or "100% natural packaging!" and other attractive gimmicks. We need manufacturers for appliances to have mycelia products available on the cheap to easily make the switch.

That shocked me…

that shocked me, now I know not to toss that "bio degradable shopping back in with my compost, they didn't last long but every once in a while the grocery store has them pop up.

😮

@@David_Quinn_Photography Shopping bags make great mini garbage bags, reducing the need to purchase (just to throw away) as many new "garbage" bags. Paper grocery bags make great recycling bins as they stand up on their own and can easily be carried out and Tetris'ed into the bin.

yeah I was ignorant too; what shameful false marketing... it's all purely buzz-words to get consumers to buy their products.

And I'm kind of mad this wasn't referenced. The main reason why recycling doesn't get recycled is because people put the WRONG THINGS in the recycling and it ends up jamming the equipment. So countries stopped taking the recycling. It's genuinely not as simple as putting things into the recycling bin.

@@ayannababii maybe a way to help sove this is to make it a requirement to have the material type or recycle type of every material so consumers can easily differentiate and properly place the right things into the right boxes

@@lesussie2237 most people don't want to have 3 different recycling bins in their house and don't have the means to take those separated containers to the appropriate place. Even if it was clearly labeled, people have to care AND have access to a recycling center AND other countries would have to trust the US again and be willing to accept our recycling

@Eric excellent obvious point. A less obvious point would be that she knew and intentionally avoided the question so why is that and how much is she being paid to pollute our planet?

That is the sad fact that I learnt very recently. Most people assume all that they give for recycling gets recycled.

Also corporations don't do their part and somehow its consumers fault for not recycling

@@bluehornet197 It falls more on consumers. Individuals actually produce far more waste than the companies do. Also keep in mind, most companies are to get stuff to you, now you hold all the waste, should the company do something about your waste now, or should you?

@@OmniscientWarrior thats purely false corporations produce 10yrs worth of household waste in one year many studies back this up most people know to recycle and actually do but corporations and companies can get away with not recycling cause they are industry and these corporations are sending the plastics overseas and having them dumped I would like to know how thats on individuals? When clearly these plastics were put into the allocated trash heap did individual people haul that garbage overseas to rot? Or was it corporations that had the means and facilities to dump said plastic?

@@bluehornet197 And how many more households are there than corporations? We outnumber them by a large amount. That is why you don't need to hit a large customer base to become very wealthy and have a large business.

@@OmniscientWarrior lol are you trying to debunk the studies that have been done that actually say corporations produce more? Regardless if there are more households AGAIN all the research shows corporations are polluting the planet more then households are and corporations have far more resources to produce the rubbish and pollutant and far more resources to send it overseas but I guess all that research is wrong because you a random dumbass on the internet disagrees? Lol you're a joke

Why are you using lots of soap and water? You fill up the container with water for a soak and put it through the dishwasher later.

@@nunyabusiness3786 the obvious response to your question is that not all of us have dishwashers. In fact I’d wager most of us don’t lol

@@nunyabusiness3786 respectfully, this was fairly tone deaf.

Cleaning it out definitely is better. I try to rinse out things I recycle like milk jugs, plastic containers, etc. For the peanut butter example, you put soap and water (make sure the lid is closed so water doesn’t leak out) and shake it up. Even letting water soak in it several hours helps.

Cleaning it out definitely is better. I try to rinse out things I recycle like milk jugs, plastic containers, etc. For the peanut butter example, you put soap and water (make sure the lid is closed so water doesn’t leak out) and shake it up. Even letting water soak in it several hours helps.

I think the solution is to literally force them to take on the cost by making the alternative more expensive thru fines AND by incentivizing everyone else to do better. as more people become interested in true sustainability, the companies that do right by the environment will be more profitable than the ones that don't. and to be fair, there are a lot of companies genuinely interested in doing good. it's just a matter of making them more accessible to everyone and penalizing the ones that aren't making efforts to do better.

She's got a great voice for it too

I support this. It's been 3 minutes and I'm already obsessed with her.

Plus so many people don’t think, or care, about what ultimately happens to waste. As long as it goes away they’re happy thinking it’s all fine and dealt with. Shooting waste into space just means there will be a bunch of waste in space. It isn’t like it’ll break down and disappear just because it’s in space. Even traditional garbage dumps are basically a pit you pile everything in and wait for it to break down.

They never watched WALL-E, apparently

I imagine one day, when energy becomes massively easy to produce, we will have to resort to some sort of accelerator system to just auto-fling all the garbage into space.

Billionaires rotted their minds

Most people are idiots.

Seems like you didn't throw hard enough

What if you throw the object tied to a rock?

Most thing catch on fire before it even touch the magma it would be useless.

And a lot of organic waste would simply explode.

Nice try. I’ve seen the Lord of the Rings. Gollum obviously sinks

Yeah, she really floated over that question and didn't address real concerns about recycling efficacy. Not only is China not taking our recycling anymore, but the amount of energy and pollution that occurs because of recycling -- does it balance out? Or is it just making people feel better about themselves, instead of encouraging them to do what really makes a difference (buying fewer new things).

She did address it, just in a big systems way instead of a small way. That's part of what she meant by making sure that the recycled goods were accessible and didn't have to travel as far. (That means having recycling facilities closer to a) the place of collection and b) close to the places of production that are using recycled goods.

It’s a marketing ploy by plastic manufacturers to make you feel better about throwing it away

nerd out! 🤘

Lmao what nerd, she doesn’t know anything about her supposed “field of expertise”

@@annaSHRRR What do you mean by that?

Yes! I'm loving it. She's geeking out for sure

@@annaSHRRR you're in another comment section I saw... what a capitalist shill. Not everything is a conspiracy or "Marketing Strategy," this includes the Recycling Industry/Movement. Its time you confront your Capitalist biases and adopt a different view... maybe you'll learn something that doesn't revolve around greed, selfish behavior, and predatory ideals.

Yeah she did kinda touch on the circular economy concept near the start tbf, I guess you can't go in too deep in a video like this

It's already WILD!!

@@SlightlyDazed. it should be about going deeper about those things, 'cause it ppl don't get to know those concepts they probably gonna stay inside libraries never to be used

@@Cangaca777 it can always get wilder

Cradle to Cradle (the book) should be required reading. It really is the kind of stuff most of us would not dream up, but it makes perfect sense and could revitalize a lot of the economy in addition to reducing waste. Things like a pair of running shoes where the soles are made of organic compounds blended specifically to enrich the ground you’re running on.

Glad to see someone point that out, that was the one bit that struck me as quite strange. It really is so subjective to just generally say everyone can do it too as some people are on septic systems for example

Such a hard agree I wish they'd delete that part of the video, even with her caveats its just such bad, bad advice.

I dunno. Like chili is a good example of something that's fine. Like if it's a food that's generally quite sloppy, mostly liquid with very small solids, there's no real risk. But if you're thinking of putting chicken bones down there or a whole meat loaf then you're an idiot.

I would even say toilet paper is a no-no for most cities. I certainly know that in my country you should throw used paper in a bin as most cities are not prepared, infrastructure-wise, to receive toilet paper. Remembering that toilet paper can add-up in fatbergs.

You don't put toilet paper down the drain, you put in a sanitary waste bin. Here, we don't use toilet paper, we use hand flushes - not a problem for us.

People please use bidets, cleaner and greener.

@@wilhelmpaulm Why does it matter to you how other people clean their asses? Are you just a big weirdo, or what

I cringed when she said flushing chili down the toilet would be okay. That can cause major issues, as you stated. For me, that one statement discredits everything else this "expert" said.

She already mentioned composting, why wouldn't she tell people to compost their food waste.. flushing it down the toilet is literally the last thing you would do.. If you're that concerned about just throwing it in your trash, throw it out in the woods and let nature take care of it

Even toilet paper can be troublesome

This is the part I needed to know. Thank you for adding!

@@taimatsuko thank you for adding, I wanted to know if it would be a theoretical option, not if it's morally okay...

Thank you for the info !

@agentid36 Your proof?

So surface perturbation does not demonstrate that the volcano is more or less dangerous without it. There are quite a few factors that are not given consideration here. How much perturbation is caused? Does 100 liters of water create a magnitude of surface disturbance greater than 10 liters? That is an extremely important question to consider. Given that a volcano that could be used for incineration is extremely unlikely to have people or vegetation in close proximity, how much does surface perturbation “matter”? The entire topic was treated in a most cursory of manner. This is minimal effort theater and I was hoping for more substance.

Wow that’s lazy on a whole new level. 😳

Just don’t replace it i guess

Good lord. People are awful.

I don't really think one can incentivise a moron. It's really like talking to a wall.

Yes and we only recycle certain materials and #s if plastics in our local areas, I try to buy products that will for sure be recycled and locally when possible

democrats.

@@robert9595 Sure, OK.

@@crankfastle8138 We continue to sell our resources to china, and than buy the products they make with our resources. Obama sent more jobs overseas with his policies that affected production (those "green" laws made it very expensive to manufacture over here. Thats why companies went over seas, less environmental laws..less cost of manufacturing) Now that the democrats hold congress they're free to pass and restrict any measures they so choose, especially since they have a puppet in office to sign off on these bills instead vetoing them due to their costliness. But aye, if you wanna sit there and say "Sure, OK" when you can very easily get informed on the negative impact these green laws cause, insyead of following blindly bcuz "We GoTtA sAvE tHe EnViRoNmEnT (even though other countries contribute far more pollution than the US even without our "environmentally friendly" laws) Than so be it.

The reason why we don't recycle it here is because we can't. If we kept it here, it would keep piling up. And instead, we dump it on other countries when they can hardly handle their own. We make Americans feel good about recycling, but it just gets sent off to other countries that may not have strict environmental standards. The stuff they can't recycle gets illegally dumped into rivers and then flows into the ocean. Or they burn it in illegal burn pits that cause toxic fumes for the local communities.

For one, it's dangerous like you said(yes they do spurt the trash back and they'll be burning and accompanied by lava to top it off). Second, volcanoes give off harmful gasses as is, we don't need to add more harmful gasses by burning trash. Also there aren't a lot of volcanoes with active lava lakes.

well the obvious is burn pits for United States military base or 9/11 word trade center terrorist attack and all the cancers that follows for both but it kind of break the mood...

Kcup has a recycling program specifically for the cups

@@emzealous It doesn't take a genius to know it't a cop-out. No company actually recycle stuff like this because of the perceived "biohazard" that's inherent in such designs. All heavily subsidised "waste management" companies love schemes just like this.

@@emzealous I'll have to let my building manager know. At this point, they all just get dumped into the trash (right next to the recycling bin). All of the coffee bar stuff is delivered by a coffee-service company, (Parks). I wonder if they have a program tied to the cup recycling. Another question for the building manager.

"Not to seem too progressive" -- heaven forbid you'd want to be seen as an intelligent person who wants to improve the world. Jesus Christ what is happening to people...

Even the inventor of those coffee pods regrets doing so.

I see what u did there

So says a youtube comment lol

Ayyyye

You got a snort out of me. Good one.

That's why they recycled them into a KZfaq video

My supermarket has a soft plastics bin. Once I started doing that I only put one very small bag of rubbish a week in the normal bin. And that's mostly food scraps that can't be composted and dirty tissues.

@@em84c yes

Thank you for answering the question clearly, she did a little sneaky on us! :D

That's honestly the first thing I was concerned about. Messing with nature like that doesnt sound smart or safe. But honestly I dont think she intentionally didnt mention this, she probably just didnt know the answer because that sounds more biology knowledge based.

Probably because she’s not a geologist

@@jonathansilvestri7648 agree, she's answering her field

@@jonathansilvestri7648 Yep, I never thought about it lol

There are also charities that collect old electronics, especially cellphones, to give to needful families, refugees or people living in very poor countries. Also, sometimes it is possible to upcycle something, if you are a craftsman. I once upcycled an older computer into a MAME arcade emulator machine that looks just like a typical arcade machine :) An old iPhone can be made into a baby monitor for example. Upcycling is great because often times it means you also reduce waste. Because if you use an old iPhone as a baby monitor, you don't need to buy one, so one less item that needs to be produced and might end up as e-waste down the road.

you're right about one thing: it's important to be aware of what you're doing and not just rely on a company's sales pitch. doing just a little research into your options can pay off in dividends.

​@@Sicho84people like you are so inspiring! I wish I had the skills (or the time and energy to learn these skills) to do cool stuff like you. this isn't to say I don't have skills, but unfortunately I do have to rely on companies and organizations to make use of my old and broken stuff

I love how, NO matter what, nerds will be nerds and get stuff that's really cool but also unnecessary for what they actually need. but we're nerds! we gotta have our nerd stuff lol

just do what I do - come back to this video every so often for a refresher! that's the beauty of KZfaq. unless a channel deletes a video or it is taken down for TOS reasons, it'll always be here with its information. and you can always write down the most important parts to you so you can bring them along long term in your life! :)

Please tell it's not something like this kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mp59bKiQvamXg6M.html

bc most recycling just ends up in a landfill, and people have been recycling for years and years and nothing has changed. More pollution is happening, wasteful packaging hasn't changed. People are exhausted trying to help the planet, but at the end of the day it's all about money those in charge of facilities for recycling see no real profit in trying to do sustainable recycling. The amount of plastic in the world has already did enough damage to last millions of years, and companies are just making more.

@@rutela3668 I think they meant "how can people think it's difficult to put plastic in the plastic bin, paper in the paper bin, glass in the glass bin, etc?? It's literally so simple"

You're right. People who are willing to recycle their waste have no problem discerning different types of waste. It's just that most of us are aware of how insignificant effect it ends up having.

@@rutela3668 Yup. Technology is useful to us and we cannot realistically wean off of it. `we shouldn't have to. The problem to solve, and quick, is to achieve a complete turnover of waste in order to limit the use of processes that build new things out of virgin materials. Recycling may be a big part of it but it's never gonna cut it on its own. I say we burn what we can't recycle. Responsibly.

@@rutela3668 I was just clarifying what the commenter in the video was saying because the presenter didn’t understand their question. The question “why is it so hard” is rhetorical. The person who replied to you worded it better than I did lol I wasn’t asking the question or making a point, just trying to clarify what was being asked in the video

You never watched The Sopranos

My little local pizza shop used to offer a free medium pizza when you brought back 10 empty boxes for recycling before my town had curbside recycling.

That’s great to hear! Just make sure to never recycle the greasy parts of pizza boxes because they cannot be recycled if they’ve been contaminated with food residue.

@@pronalitysangles6027 so basically.. the pizza box.

The upper lid of the pizza box may be clean and recyclable if the little plastic table in the middle did it's job to not let it sink on to the pizza, so just cut the lid off and recycle it

@@pronalitysangles6027 You are wrong. The county stated you could recycle the whole pizza box. I'm guessing they figured out how to recycle the box even with some grease on it.

not sure who you're hanging out with but there's so many regular people out there who are doing their best. just because you may not care much to learn how you can do your best doesn't mean other people are the same way.

good on you for doing that!

Actually we just send it to China.

Unfortunately the US only cares about money & how to get more of it. Everything they do revolves around money. War, recycling, waste removal, water, fuel, EVERYTHING is a business & absolutely nothing is for the greater good.

Could they use bining systems similar to mail services? Like take a reusable standard-box-sized bin and pack it with smaller boxes (or, even better, thin padded envelopes)? Seems silly to ship something like a single toothbrush in an otherwise empty giant box.

You mean they pick your console apart for spare parts and sell them? lol