I miss Fry’s voice.

This kind of technology creates homeless people by stripping skilled labourers of their jobs. Are they supposed to then depend upon charity or the state to provide homes for their families? Give people skills and then give them the opportunity to work, that's what 'homeless' people need, not disruptive technology that removes humans from the equation.

@@PWMoze I've never met a brick layer that enjoys laying bricks, and I've met a few in my rural town. I still think affluent people will want skilled labour so they can have nicer houses than the rest of us and everything you wear and use is a product of industrial revolution that put billions of people and generations out of jobs and into new jobs. We can do it again.

or, and hear me out.... we use the government for its intended purpose and use tax dollars to build new infrastructure and housing. let's quit this neoliberal bullshit while we still can. #TaxTheRich

This idea of stealing the benefits of innovation and risk from the innovator has to be one of the most stupid I’ve heard. It’s a proposal to poison the innovation process at its gestation. If you’ve got to scratch that static Schrooge McDuck itch of the tax and spend goofs, penalise those wasting resources and money by persisting with old, inefficient practices.

You must be kidding, this is going to create more poor people, not provide homes for them.

I get it.. but its going to eliminate hundreds of thousands of jobs

You will own nothing and be happy 😊

It is all a Illusion in a Great Delusion of a Schizophrenic Soul, he is the so called savior of mankind you know jesuschrist real name Roman, the brein behind all the rubbish shit on Pearl Mother Earth the inventor of religion. Become Aware, the AI (19) are here to take your soul and suck you dry so you are out of order! Welcome into the Dimension of the doggies of Tartarus. This intel👆🏽 is non hybrid human!

Have you ever heard of the first rule of real estate? LOCATION LOCATION LOCATION Homes are cheap to build.

Amen

too utopian. it will improve until some group gripes over it. plus its going to lead to a bunch of new issues.It will be nice for a while. but certain aspects of humanity keep us from enjoying nice things for too long.

That robot might be the big bad wolf, but the smart pig built with brick.

I'm still skeptical about these 3D printed houses. It looks great and fast to build, even at a way lower cost then normal. But still i need to see how it will stand the test of time. Maybe the house will stand forever, but it can also be a ruïne in a short amount of time. I would not give up your profession just yet, this will take years to perfect. And yes , i know they are doing this for years already. It is still relatively new and they still need to figure out a lot of things. Most ideas are good, but only on paper.

@@stephandevriesere3667 there's an interesting video by a woman called Belinda Carr, with a channel of the same name. She kind of tones down the hype quite a bit, while still seeing potential in this kind of technology. Focused on construction and not "3d printing" in general. To me the worst aspect in this video is how homelessness is kind of seen as a technological and economic problem rather than a fundamentally economic and legal/human rights issue. Some estimates give that there are actually more empty homes than homeless people in the US at least. Pindex is cool and generally good, but it will fall for some questionable hypes like "solar roadways" and/or the "hyperloop."

​@@petitio_principii, 100 % agree with you. This tech could solve a whole lot of problems for homeless people anywhere in the world. To bad there are way to many "rich" people and company's that will stop any attemd to use this to solve the housing problems for a fraction of the normal cost. They are to greedy and only want to see more money coming in. As long as the wealthy rich are the ones governments listen to, nothing will be done with this unless they can make lots of money of it.

​@@stephandevriesere3667 It's one thing if the government is too stuck up and profit driven to help people in need in this case the homeless but I think you should never forget that the bigger percentile of rich people come from literally nothing. I think whoever proves himself/herself to become competent enough to "succeed" in this day and age should have the right to keep as much of that wealth and also the right to help where it's needed. The Utopia you envision where nobody suffers is almost impossible to create and the only thing that could save the most poor in this world are themselves and/or good leadership by the government and saint-like "rich" people

A human comes in and does the complex work

@@ezicarus8216 And he does it for free with socialist unicorns bringing manna from heaven and a health care plan from heaven with robotic 3d printers feeding him and taking care of him. Welcome to the matrix.

@@ezicarus8216 Precisely. It's also much more difficult and time consuming to run mechanical and electrical in finished walls. Might have to resort to having everything surface-mounted, which means $$$ for armoured conduit and the like.

Chased into the floors and wall by manual labour.

You just watched a video of a robot extruding material. It never occurred to (any of) you that your concerns are pre-programmed?

Indeed. There are more empty houses than homeless people. The only reason homelessness is a problem is because it is not profitable to house them.

We'll need all these houses for the homeless bricklayers.

What does a society that cares about people look like? And how does it differ from the current one? IDK

@@michaelstreeter3125 it would be a society where everyone has a house, everyone has enough food to eat for starters We have enough food on this earth to feed every single person, we have enough houses to house everybody- it is just not seen as profitable to do so

@@michaelstreeter3125 For sake of argument i assume you know some of the horror stories of US health (un)care system, where you can go broke just because you have some complicated health issues, now imagine a system where you do not go broke under similar conditions, and this will scale throughout much of

If you invest in real estate in Nigeria,Africa, youll have luxurious home here. Its possible because of exchange rate.

@@graceo9825 Australia is far too expensive, I have been considering leaving if I have to but I’m not giving up just yet.

Buy a tent!

@@time2kickarse ...then move to San Francisco.

@@jntj3007 lol your tent will fit right in the streets of San Francisco.

I'm sick of people acting like removing the labour cost of housing will make housing affordable . There's very little material and labour cost in a house. Avarage house is 60k labour and materials the rest is developer profits . Removing the labour cost just means more developer profits and less jobs the workers 😡 I still won't be able to attend a house I allso won't be able to build them for others to get food.

@@avancalledrupert5130 I hear you man, but it depends who’s in charge of the housing market, doesn’t it? If resources allocation is handled between the State and housing developers (both of whom are quite often self-serving parasites), you can bet that prices will hike on. If resource allocation is designated to a benevolent & impartial AI, without such self-serving impulses, then this might be the greatest thing you’ve seen in the last 40 years!

no in most places the limiting factor is bureaucracy and corruption rather than land value or construction costs.

George Carlin had the answer --GOLF COURSES!!

@@TheSuperappelflap no its land cost and zoning

Yes. In my personal experience it's simply that the worthwhile jobs/careers are in "cities", places of high density where land costs a fortune, so you must pay high or live poorly if you want work to earn an income. I worked in 4 big cities for 53 years and then bought rural, cheap, 50 miles from any town/city just 20 days after retirement.

@@ezicarus8216 no he didn't. He blamed corruption and red tape, not the actual land value in areas not reserved for factories.

They should open up fully. Their own policies created their problem.

And that's why any innovation is soon sucked up by increasing land prices. The free market simply doesn't work. The sooner that's acknowledged the sooner the clock turns back to sane housing prices and rents.

Ownership of land, is soon to become worthless. The mass majority, will have control of it's use. !! Mega Structure: Land Isolation

Get ready for 10 storey skinny homes. I hope there is an elevator.

Maybe they can also start 3D printing lots to go with the printed house.

@@brynleytalbot778 lmao. free market. you living under a rock lately? Housing prices have been propped up by Quantitative Easing and low rates for decades. those 300k dollar houses would be 120k in a normal market with a normal 4-8% interest rate rather than a 1-2% one.

Code enforcement, zoning permits and building inspections can cost thousands before you even nail two boards together! And you usually have a finish deadline of two years via the building permit, otherwise you get to start the whole shakedown process all over. No building and improving as you can afford it in this made to fail racket! The system is set up to keep poor people trapped in wage slavery paying tribute to landlords, lenders and tax collectors for decades, until the poor person drops dead.

land is quite cheap in many rural areas. you are just picky in terms of location.

Makes me sick

Yeah it's the fact that industry is becoming robotic and all this is not about helping homelessness this is pushing human out of the work force no middle class no unions 9 to 5's tougher to make a living.

@just another human bingo!

Why is it scary .?

@@rauljrlara9994 that working class start become useless for some people... vaccine

think you need a 3D brain printing!

When you lose your job for whatever reason, you find another. Im 55 and Ive had to do it more times than I can count. Noone bailed out the pony express riders or the telegraph operators

There is still going to be a ton of work in the finishing/carpentry industry.

Retrain them? Let them indulge in living rather struggling for life?

UBI

Just forget all of that important stuff. Ooh! Ahh! ...Follow along.

Well if you’re only earning $3 a day, then you’re probably also on government assistance receiving unemployment checks or other checks that can cover electrical, water, and other bills.

@@dinomightstudios4119 ....He’s not talking about how to pay the bills,,,,,, He’s saying that the house wiring, plumbing, windows, doors, heat & A/C..... all missing from the video.

@@boomstick4054 Oh, but didn't you hear? These will use passive heating/cooling. No need for all those expensive "luxuries". The people "living" in them won't have money for "utilities", because they wont have jobs. These are essentially glorified stone huts. What this video really overlooks is the environmental impact of mass producing "soil based material". Vast amounts of "soil", even if "locally sourced", means massive digging sites. Where is all this "soil" going to come from? How much natural area will have to be sacrificed to make all this? According to www.davidmoore.org.uk/21st_Century_Guidebook_to_Fungi_PLATINUM/Ch01_03.htm#:~:text=Only%20about%207.5%25%20of%20the,centres%2C%20land%20fills%2C%20etc. , only 7.5% of Earth's surface is covered in "soil", and a growing population will need all of it for food production. This site has an even grimmer picture. www.earthsciweek.org/classroom-activities/how-much-soil-there "The last section (1/32nd or 3 percent of the apple) represents the area of the world developed by humans. Now, carefully peel the last 1/32nd section. This small bit of peel represents the portion of our planet that is soil on which humans depend for food production and similar uses. So, like water and air, soil is a very important and limited natural resource." Just saying.

@@dinomightstudios4119 Why not using those guys which cannot afford the house as work force to their future homes. In the end the printer is using more or less the same materials. The houses are not affordable because of high cost with labors? Then you have the solution. Don't teach people to be lazy, I think:D.

It's Los Angeles, for crying out loud. Palm trees.

@@edennis8578 What about AC then?

Former construction worker cant afford kids :)

That's how they'll be built until humans are extinct. Nothing has changed.

Future kids will be plugged into the A.I. mainframe, they'll no longer be thinking for themselves and the A.I. won't want the kids learning about the days when people thought for themselves and then screwed over the later generations... Oooh, they're already connected.

@@reggiep75 I hope not...But it's going that way already.

@@reggiep75 There'll never ben an AI mainframe. There'll never be AI. True AI would be worthless to us or anyone else. Kids will be plugged into a network, though, one full of distributed-computing nodes that use video games to get kids to process data for free.

Okay sir, noted.!

I can already imagine Mars being Tatooine

4:42 hold on a sec. Overwhelming majority of homeless people are men. California - the most woke socialist state has around the same number of homeless people as the rest of them combined. And you say it's because of DOMESTIC VIOLENCE or BANKRUPTCY? No. In all of those cases the reason can be summarized in just one word THE LEFT. Morally elevated idiots of no known knowledge of anything practical living a 170 years old dream. Houses are too expensive? Obviously! Millions are flooding in from Latin America. What would you expect? And no. A house IS NOT build in 2 days for half the price. Construction, which this idea is so about is a least cost, time, effort consuming stage. The WHOLE rest is done by hand.

No one is going to mars

You can get one if you are holding Dogecoin

and everyone else soon as AI takes over all jobs

Sadly yes. Containers and mobile homes (vans are already built by robots) are already there since 90's. People keep reproducing. I was born in most polluted region of Europe. Sad place, but because pollution noone wanted to live there. After population boom this place has population density of 200ppl/km! Radioactive, dirty place with acid rains and no hope for cleanup ever, as you got waste all into buildings, trees and just quite much everything. Did it stop people from reproducing? Most still believe some wonder tech or political system will save them, riding straight to abbys and getting children to school, with dumb narcissist pride brlieving chidren can be dumbed down not to see what their parents are building. More propaganda of success please! alcohol! bullshit jobs and hate. Just blame it on immigrants 😅 they actually had to pay extra to import immigrants because no sane person would immigrate there, so their scapegoating line did not hold with only locals 😅 Then You have Chelyabinsk, Magnetogorsk and other proud and dirty cities wchich are becoming memes on their own (like Gary, Detroit and Norilsk)

@@piotrcurious1131 cairo is 17k per km, try that

@@yousefabdelmonem3788 Haha yes, it might sound low compared to capital cities 😅 Forgot to explain it's not even a city. And it is in North - not really place habitable for crowds, as one depends on loads of energy , supplies and nature to just survive winter - it goes on huge ecological debt.

My grandfather purchased his home near Seattle for $30,000 in the early 1970's. It's now valued at over $500,000... the housing market is out of control

Whatcom county

...and vast energy and plumbing and electrical and roofing and flooring and cabinetry and drywall and painting and septic and water and civil work and driveway...

Just leftist logic.

@@user-xv4id9xx7u that would be a contradiction in terms...

@@kevincrosby1760 I'm afraid you're right, I haven't thought it through.

The idea is, if Biden’s $200 billion housing project uses this technology, everyone will have a home, thus reducing the prices of the things people need and thus effectively giving even people on $7.25/hour a massive effective pay increase.

2030, we own nothing and we are happy… F the new world order.

"Depend on the government", you're kidding, right? Government is just the place where power is organised, the interface between the powerful, and the sections of the population hired to protect the powerful, like police etc, and protect and project their power, like military and intelligence agencies. That's why we have things like "rights", we fought their wars, but when they don't even need people to build bigger and bigger prisons, and machines that never get tired and cannot be bribed guard them, there'll be no need for a government that you can depend on. The power hungry are never kind to the people they have no need for.

Moronic summation .. at best.

Funny how ignorant you are.

This will be really good - only needs a few economic migrants, vaxxed out of their mind's and into dull submission to push buttons for pennies. (That's after they have buried all those that died of vaxxinations!!!). The WEF elite and their slave survivors; to act as maintenance men. The are saving the planet - but not the inhabitants. Wakey wakey folks - they ain't doing this for you!

This. Things are worth whatever supply/demand dictates and whatever the perceived utility value of that thing is. This will ultimately just make housing developers more profitable.

@@ezicarus8216 When? You ask as if education begins and ends on exact points in time. I never stop learning. Can you explain how supply and demand is a fallacy? In my city, house prices are skyrocketing recently, because the demand is outstripping the supply. That's no fallacy.

@@ezicarus8216 How is that relevant to your assertion that supply and demand is a fallacy?

@@ezicarus8216 Okay. I don't live in North Korea. Ready for your explanation.

Labour costs, plant costs, manufacturing costs and more are all deduced massively from this type of production. The material itself doesn't even need to be made in a factory! It also would produce houses faster, flooding the market and making your average house cheaper thanks to lowering demand. M+E, roof and substruct might still be the same price but you've eliminated almost every other cost. Your comment is short sited at best.

Prices for land in Canada skyrocketed also.

Prices are mostly determined by demand and supply. In Los Angeles, everyone wants to live close to the Bay Area due to economic opportunities. Demand has gone up. But there's no more space to build more houses. Supply has remained the same. This causes prices to rise fast due to demand. The world recently passed the point where more than 50% of the global population now live in cities. So, more people are cramming into smaller areas, competing for housing. Hence why housing prices have gone up significantly. The problem is it a lack of houses. The areas we're trying to all cram into is too small to facilitate that much housing.

@@tylerdurden3722 The goal of Agenda 2030 is to reduce land and allow wilderness and smart cities to create urbanized housing for the masses so they will all live as renters. The goal is to destroy all aspects of production and capitalism so there won't be any energy for food, travel or really anything at all. The goal of Agenda 21 and leaders like Canada's prime minister and Biden is to destroy the economy and private property and consumer markets, to create a world wide destruction of the free world. They will squeeze and squeeze and offer half baked tech solutions that don't work because they cannot be powered by a missing power grid, a missing credit and economic grid and a missing food grid. Corporations and dreamers who produce these wonder gadgets will still try to innovate, but you will hear things like in one POST CARBON institute webcast that things are so much better under Covid because we all learned to live off 10 percent of what we were living off of. But nobody is living and supporting their taxes and house payments on 10 percent of what they were getting pre-covid, it's all funny money bailouts. Without real production you have NO ECONOMY and even the farms are being taken over to create a natural land for wilderness. Which means setting aside resources for countries like China which are producing cities. pouring as much cement in three years actually 40 percent more than the USA poured in 100 years. So capitalistic countries like China will continue to rise with their authoritarian capitalism and NAZI like harvesting of donor organs from their oppressed class and they will pollute 7 times more to produce steel we could have made here in the USA, with no bounds on pollution they will continue to pollute and create far more C02 30 times more than every volcano for three years in the world with C02 output alone. As they do this they will continue to grow a real economy while the US and other five leading nations of the "evil" first world are destroyed by Agenda 2030 plans which are NOT SUSTAINABLE Economically but designed to take away farm land, private property and cram the starving survivors into stacked small rooms in "smart cities" which is a keyword for a controlled population in planned high rise hell like the former Soviet Union or Failed dense population housing in the third world. With Uganda like farming goals of destroying farming to "save the world" from global warming, it's not wonder some hope some kind of robotic housing can be built on the cheap for the drug addicts and poor souls destroyed by their own party spirit or the outsourcing of all jobs to China as we feed, obey and observe the commands from our overlords in China. Some dream of robotic 3d buildings on Mars hoping to get away and 3d printed homes and construction is much like primitive MUD earthen houses, but its' poured via robots. In many countries of the world cement is the worst form of building material. It's even looked down on by Agenda 21 planners seeking to destroy America and capitalism under a guise of false sustainability. Nice technology ideas, but they almost never scale to something that can help people. But with a goal to steal, kill and destroy capitalism all these upstart businesses will be swept away into a sea of unsustainable economic profit as the destruction of the US economy is the key anyway and the goal anyway for Chinese and communist domination. It's cool stuff the tech no doubt, but much of that tech is then used against the masses by the central powers. For example learning about low cement produced compressed earth block was done a lot by the US military as they created houses and complexes in their bases to practice on so they could replicate housing in Iraq. So the Army for example learned a lot about how to make earthen and compressed earth houses, because they needed to develop munitions to shoot through the walls of earthen wall houses in Iraq. So much of the new school technology is just a twist on the old school technology of earth based housing used in the third world. We add a robot instead of making walls out of compressed earth blocks and act as if it's an advantage. By the way they even have compressed earth block building machines that make the blocks which use 10 percent of the cement in a cement block house as less cement is needed when mixed with earth. 10 percent or less cement means a lot less fossil energy is needed to create the same volume of housing. So compressed earth or mixed earth 3d printing might be a cool thing. But then again in America and first world countries the average real estate agent and city assessor likes more traditional housing often being stick framed housing and block houses bring less tax dollars. The high level of taxes and prices of bubble economies for flipping and creating greater value housing to support the central planners or local planner government is also an issue. If you make housing to cheap, they won't be able to tax it and the political push back can be immense. And much of the cool stuff we see from alternative housing livestyles is cool but the embedded energy and large footprint of those structures can't always scale to meet the needs of denser city populations the average earth ship house costs a TON Of money but tries to save on energy efficiency from solar gains. And the average home or self sufficient crop farmer with biofuels, gardening, crops for animals food and energy for their lifestyle is unsustainable via PEAK OIL theory which of course has been proven to be a false energy crisis as well, but much wisdom is piece together in small pieces as they act as if they don't have a plan and are doing things in different approaches. . . I don't condemn all the approaches, but the overall plan is often hidden it's agenda 2030 based on a 1000 page plan which requires the destruction of the capitalistic world and the destruction of farming and capitalism without any alternative system that can work. So this is NOT A SLAM on the GOOD INNOVATION they are trying to do here, it's just a quick warning to tell you these solutions are not perfect nor necessarily based on a solution that is well thought out. You still need raw materials, work, and energy and wealth to make this work. The overall problem is the far right and far left almost have the same goal for the average person.

Trust me... you never want to live in a 3D printed house.

@@firecatgreg Nice novel...

Cool, lol

glad I'm not alone!

You definitely need to fool KZfaq's algorithms if this is the most profound video you've seen.

Then go to different ET channel, this technology is longtime out for us 🙃

This is almost entirely fantasy.

@Naymul Islam not the OP but I think I get what he's referring to. In my country there's a huge incentive to keep housing supply low and costs high because a lot of people make a lot of money out of property and even for those with just one house, a loss of property value is a vote loser. We've had the technology to build more houses for a long time but it didn't happen anyway. However this video highlights other benefits to this technology so its still cool.

@Naymul Islam Yes it helps but to end the problem or at least make it so small and insignificant you have to fight the route causes. (wich are a bad health care system. barrely any worker protection, very expencive education, etc)

Yo two of your examples (expensive health care and education) are literally technological and will one day be solved with technology. The problem the video outlines is houses being expensive and this makes houses cheaper. What's the beef

@@garethhobday3601 ÄÄÄMM I live with cheap healthcare and pricy houses can be solved just look for Vienna. The housing prices are low becouse the comune goverment (city goverment) owns most houses and rent is pretty cheap. Those problems can surely be solved by technology but Patents make most things even Insulin (wich can cheaply be massproduced) very expencive So Yes tech can solve those problems but waiting until this happens doesn´t excuses doing nothing until it becomes feasebul. And Healthcare that is expencive is a problem that cannot be solved with technology but has to be solved with policies that must shatter monopolys and price contol by companies. Even the drug that can heal everything and can be mass produced cheaply doesn´t help anyone if no one can pay for it Sorry for the long text

@Naymul Islam Well we are all civiliced people we just forget it sometimes

Thats a very nice story but stay on topic man !

He's on topic. He exposes one additional reason for homelessness. And the primary causes - Affordability and utilities. You can't afford to save if you're paying property taxes and utilities. It's a perpetual state enforced on the low paid.

Me too. I'd like to order the face of Brad Pitt to replace my existing face.

That's every jump in technology ever though

"humans need not apply"

Knew I'd find this somewhere.

Excellent! I think this is the second best thing that gets people out of a job. The first, of course, would be making lawyers obsolete.

It's a hard transition between capitalism and socialism. But we are amongst it.

Wiring will be a major bitch as well.

As a person with a spinal cord injury and chronic fatigue, I am extremely thankful for my aids. There is no way I would be able to maintain my living standards otherwise.

@@M33f3r you are a sample of the people which are ment to get support. some serious injury which prevents you from taking care of your lifelyhood onyour own. but the application of the most broad brush possible .. give people money/houses and the problem is solved .. is just naive and void of any common sense. fanatic idealism waiting for the utopia

If Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram promoted "failure" as enthusiastically as "success" then maybe society wouldn't be so imbalanced towards excess profiteering on the backs of decent working people. Our societal morals and ethics are so bankrupted by politicians and their paymasters that this system has evolved to profit them. It was once fine to be poor and proud.

@@brynleytalbot778 yeah it's called humility and it is entirely lost on the average American who is COMPLETELY self adsorbed with the BULLSHIT principal of self worth being defined by how much you own or how much money you make instead of how much you care and do for the people around you. These degenerates didn't learn this in kindergarten what is going to make them change? (yes I'm talking about the OP and the many others who fall in line with their Fox 'News' talking points)

All those problems become minor once rent and mortgage payments are eliminated. People get depressed and drink because the financial situation has them working 2 jobs with barely enough for rent or food.

All we need now is to print cheap building lots.

What r u doing here lol!!! To the moon!!!

@matt Wallace

What r u doing here !!! To the moon!!!

Yup, I really want a 3D printed house and have for a while!! 👍🏻😃

I can believe that, but for someone that wants their dream house, yet couldn’t afford to do it in one go, I feel I could build the weatherproof shell first, and then outfit the home with vitals second: bathroom, bedroom, kitchen. Thereafter I can add interior “modules” as I acquire more from income. This is the same as buying a home outright, but the costs incur at a much more slowed and planned rate. If I don’t finish my home theater, no big deal for now. Maybe in the next three months. Either way, the bank loan was for just starting the project and acquiring the land. What are your thoughts on this modular concept? I just made it up, but that’s how I’ve been feeling about all this 3D stuff.

And you can incorporate ducting for water/electricity/heating while printing, even insulation if you go with that Spanish approach. If you go for a flat roof and don't have to any post processing on the walls you're done with 80% the work. All you need is a bit of equipment and cosmetic stuff. This has the potential to eliminate almost all the physical labor.

@@UltraBadass What’s the “Spanish approach”?

@@headbanger1428 it's in the video, I dont have time to rewatch and give you a timestamp, but it was creating a bunch of layers that intersect at points furthest from the next intersection, creating airpockets that can be filled with insulation

@@UltraBadass I’ll check it out, but I think you’re referring to the Italian company WASP using rice husk as insulation. I want my next home using this tech, so I’ll rewatch. This tech is so promising! 😆

If it was 3D printed, it would be both disgustingly expensive and terribly badly built.

No it's the permits and nonsense of government that is the real issue.

@@dcohn99 You mean the permits and nonsense that prevent your next-door neighbors from setting up an open cesspool and a tinderbox right next to your property line?

@@timhofstetter5654 And ugly

@@sdrc92126 And ugly. True story right there. 8)

Van Nuys would be my guess...

mud huts made from cow shit ...OH can't use cow shit they fart and pollute

@@snapon666 Well that just put Alexandria Ocasio "Cowfarts" Cortez right out of a useful job.

'in old Africa". Africa's a whole continent dude...

because these 3d printers can make concrete with hollow sections that help with insulation and save material

Finally an intelligent comment. I think they meant that it would cut away our current kind of concrete, but we can make more sustainable forms of concrete out of nearly anything, including dirt and clay. They should certainly have shown more of that.

They 3d printed some houses in new york and iirc they're on the market for 350-500k each.

And the need to move away from money and capitalism.

I used to think same thing but now we can't find any construction workers so i am thinking we kinda need this type of thing. Of course, I have the benefit of living in the future and addressing a comment made in a much different world of mid 2021. When the labor crunch hit, i felt like a fool for not anticipating it because i knew that after the Black death the plague made a tour of Europe, peasants had bargaining power for like the first time in centuries. Why? because so many had died that the ruling class had no choice but to pay almost a living wage. And peasants had options. A neighboring lord would protect and value a good worker, welcoming if they decided to leave their lord. But me, my lord treated me fairly well when my life fell apart during the worst of this disaster. And now that my money is worth 20% less than what it was a few years ago, i got a raise to almost cover that (of course the govt says it's only like 8% inflation but other than my mortgage, anything i go buy is 20% to 100% more expensive than it was a year or two ago.. Literally anything. I can't think of a single good that hasn't increased by at least 25%. Services have as well....)

Since by definition capitalism is run by the people instead of the government your comment is nonsense. People invest in themselves. Capitalism has moved more people out of poverty than every other system combined and by a wide margin.

@@RS-ls7mm Really? Is that why the US has increasing numbers of homeless? Trickle down economics from neo-liberalism has been demonstrated to be false so many times it's unreal. Yes some people better themselves but when there are less jobs available the parts of the population who are not capable of getting a degree ar all scrambling for the same dwindling supply of jobs. As a result of the supply and demand of capitalism that results in people getting paid less. Try applying some logic.,

Im all for technological innovations, but Im not sure we need to do it exclusively in service of bigger profits. If a robot can do it and save ppl time, hard labour under harsh and dangerous conditions, and do it with less waste more efficiently, then this is what we should do, regardless. And if this means we dont need construction workers anymore thats fine, we don't need elevator operators anymore either. That is being said this cannot mean that those ppl get left behind, the advancements has to benefit all of humanity including workers, not just the wealthy capital investors and business owners. We should automatize as much as we can, we don't need stupid 9-5 work 6 day a week until we get old, we need good living conditions and a chance to do what we like (and presumably what we good at) which I belive is a bit more than laying bricks.

I totally agree with you, but this Industrial revolution is different. Basically, you can and will replace all easy jobs from people with robots, but it doesnt end there: lawyers can be replaced by machines and even medical personal. So, If noone really works anymore and you can just produce stuff on demand, you dont need money anymore. Then we could all get the Universal Basic income and noone needs to work anymore, at least thats the vision. I dont know If everything I said is right, so please correct me If im wrong:)

@@ez9566 No, as I see it is correct in the sense that most if not all work you can think of is indeed automatizable, some might argue that even those which now considered creative, artistic or high level decision making jobs are prone to be automatized with enough advancement. I for one inclined to belive that as if you think about it there is no inherit physical limitation on what a machine can or cannot do, only technical cap which being rapidly revised every day. To be honest I can't see a field (maybe social worker is an exception) where a machine could not exceed a human's capability. Not a lot of ppl realize that this could be a very good thing, as for example doctors needs a lot of learning their training cost a lot, they need to work for very long to get the proper amount of experience and this makes them very expensive and irreplaceble yet still vulnerable to human error. I think the only way, we could ever have a cheap yet high quality healthcare system is to automatize the shit out of it. Computer administrator, algorythmic diagnostic, robot surgeon, high tech hospitals possibly everything automatized, that is proably the only way to finally have enough doctor, specialized expertise, caring attention (now that the robot serves you the medicine and the food the nurse has time to actually care about you) and virtualy no waiting list (or very short ones). Mark my word, humanity starts a new era of health and well being after we reach a point when we don't need ppl to save or cure ppl anymore !

We are not sokving the worlds problem. We ARE the worlds problem. Esp. the unsustainable life style we in the "West" think about as "normal".

This kind of technology creates more problems than it solves, it strips people from their jobs and makes them surplus to needs. Then it creates wealth for only those wealthy enough to invest in its development and profitable use. Disruptive technology is a threat not a solution.

You are being naive. If you were employed in the construction industry or associated services this video would be like a looming redundancy notice. It wont solve homelessness if it creates unemployment. Big Tech innovations seem to only benefit the wealthy in the long run, while the jobless and poor it creates have to depend upon charity or the state. Stick the homeless in a pod while the rich extend their lives with the surgical use of printed organs! Its a recipe for misery.

@@jarofspanners3523 No, you are naive if you think you can stop the development of new technology, a Luddite if ever there was one. There have to be political changes to accompany the technological changes that are going to come whether you like it or not, and that is what we need to fight for, not ”burn the machines”. Also, I hope you don’t work a JCB, it put loads of people out of work that just used spades...

@@pcuimac 🤢 Barf!

compare a team of people to a machine which was built to do exactly what is measured in the competition isn't a competition .. let anything be in the way, uneven floor, low quality material, something that forces to change the planned structure to be slightly different .. and the machine will be in serious troubble. if everything goes as planned .. it will be totaly out of competition

Yep, then try doing structural tests with them.

The battle was scheduled, but Paul Bunion was forced to drop out because of foot pain. ( Bunyans)

But it's slowed. We're reaching the limits of what we can physucally build for microchips AT THE ATOMIC SCALE. Because once we get down to silica only a few atoms thick, it doesn't work anymore. Moore's law has slowed more and more. But we were still getting faster chips for less money, but they weren't twice as fast as before, and they weren't half as much. Now, the price has actually been INCREASING for comparable chips or slightly better chips. Their cost isn't increasing as fast as inflation, but it's still an issue. Until we hit a BIG break and there are two ont he horizon that are inevitable: nano tech/nanobots for building all the components other than the chips, making all the other stuff really small, and 2) quantum computers. Once we can have quantum computers at room temp (or even with conventional refrigerators and not like liquid nitrogen) size won't matter so much. and then, a little futher out, is the End Game. Out last invention the last thing we'll ever make: a thing maker, MAKER. General Intelligence AI, Super intelligent General Ai? Whatever it is, a computer that's smart enough to make a better version of itself. Which will of course make an even better version. And then... i think you see where that leads. It's the last thing we'll ever make for two reasons. One ggood and one really really bad: The good reason is taht we won't NEED to make anything ever again because the thing-maker maker will be making (inventing, prototyping, refining, then manufacturing) all the things and doing it better, faster, cheaper. So we can just chill. But we can't chill for long! Becuase of the bad reason! it iwll destroy us!

Nope.

@@timhofstetter5654 Yes it is, because land owners have done exactly what the free market has always entailed for how to increase profits as quickly as possible: They have formed local governments to work the same way as a trust between water companies in artificially suppressing the supply so that it is the buyers who have to compete with ever increasing mortgage sizes in order to get the same houses. If these zoning laws were removed, then it would be land owners competing against each other to build large numbers of new houses to sell or rent, and immediately using this technology to reduce the prices of homes for everyone!

@@evannibbe9375 If zoning laws were removed, then what would prevent your next-door neighbor from setting up Chernobyl right next to your back yard? What would prevent some huge trucking company from moving in right next to your house? Or a speedway? Or a WalMart outlet store? That's what zoning does for you. News flash: the vast majority, by far, of landowners have no interest whatever in quick profit. The vast majority of landowners use their own land for their own residence and just want a nice neighborhood in which to live, preferably with the lowest possible property value until the moment at which they're forced by circumstance to sell, at which point they want the highest possible property value for the duration of the sale deal. In order for a monopoly to exist, all these landowners would have to be involved in a massive conspiracy. Are you a conspiracy theorist, Even?

@@timhofstetter5654 You do not understand the context: **housing** zoning. The Dutch have amazing options like beautiful 4-story apartments with safe streets and shared gardens for children to play in. Amazing quiet neighborhoods, where there is actual community and where children have independence. Too many back and front yards are just rotting away. We are doing jack shit with our yards, and so are most people most of the year. Regulate in soundproofing and such, of course. There's also minimum parking laws wasting a shit tonne of space, especially public space. Lots on-street parking only 1/4 being used, while driveways are empty. Auckland is going through lots of changes right now - we are about to abolish minimum parking around PT hubs enhancing our city's 'town centres' - and the diversity of buildings and options for different types of people is amazing. Don't force me to buy a 70,000NZD garage, when I can have an external cupboard for ebikes. Not doing this is anti-community, anti-children independence, anti-market, anti-choice.

@@C0deH0wler Isn't this all in reference to a question about US multi-family housing? What do the Dutch have to do with New Zealand? You've been everywhere in Holland and The Netherlands and everywhere you went, the Dutch had "beautiful 4-story apartments with safe streets and shared gardens for children"? I can't account for the stupidity of crown rule; we threw the oppressive English out of our country a long, long time ago and good riddance. It's been a while since I spent time in New Zealand, but I don't remember any yards "rotting away" or anything at all unusual about parking. Is all this zoning trouble a newish thing?

I used to be really naive and optimistic like you. But sadly due to our current economical and political system the positive effects of such wonderful technologies will be limited for humanity imo

yeah!!! and a hyperloop station everywere !!!!

Yep, curb your enthusiasm, you will be on a very rocky path before you ever get to own a house that’s you can swing a cat in, you will be made bankrupt by the people who are pushing this, then you will be put into a tower block with whoever or whatever, you will own nothing including your house, have a look at the wef website and then you will get all this into context.

but that is how the rentier class makes money. they wont part with the goose with the golden eggs willingly. it will require the use of force. it always has, historically.

I think the better way to stop the hoarding of land is to impose a progressive property tax where you have to pay say $1*(value of all land you own)*atan(ln(value of all land you own)/1000)/pi. This means that it suddenly makes sense for landlords to divide up and sell their units to their tenants (potentially for mortgages which have a monthly interest equal to what the rent would be) in order to decrease the total tax liability of everyone even if the total value of the property remains the same. This way, when those owners go to develop the property they just bought with additional units, they can now sell those additional units under similar terms, and as an area becomes more desirable, the profits from these sales can be distributed to more people!

In a way that's good, it will mean a lot of jobs for people to finish off the properties if this technology becomes the norm.

@@AbraxasArcadia agreed . The only reason I made this comment is because as an ex builder I know people get the wrong idea ... Most will assume its finished in that time ... Like you have on TV with these programs giving the wrong impression .. Makes builders life's harder than they are already as people have unrealistic expectations

Oh come on... People understand that they're not printing a damned fridge out of concrete.

@@brettvv7475 Have you met people? I assure you, there will be some that think that. lol

And it's mostly lies. By printing houses they remove human labor, which creates homeless people without a job.

@@pcuimac i was thinking the exact thing.. reducing the need of construction workers by up to 70%. So, creating homes, for the homeless, and for the people made homeless, lmao.

Housing Hoax😅

These 3D printing technology are being prepared for AI and robotics😂😂

Me too.

@Pindex fake go away

@@FaulksDigital wow, how do they make these fake accounts?! different encoding of the characters or?

@@kaziqta5053 it doesn't have the name border and you can name a brand channel anything you like

Yeah and only the rich will have access to organ replacement in the US.

We need to be “saved from capitalism”!? You’ve got to be one of those “non-deplorables” produced by a university education. Only universities produce such mindless ignorance and stupidity.

@@gunglegeorge7213 You call me stupid and ignorant, yet you didn't even try to find one argument. By the way, since I'm ignorant (and not from the US), would be so kind as to explain this "non deplorable" and "university" hatred thing ?

the solution for that is quite simple; automation tax.

@@TheSuperappelflap That's only part of the solution. I takes from the owners, that's a good first step, but it doesn't give any solution to the jobless. And I think it is hard to enforce. Just one exemple. Human workers' condition already get neglected at Amazon and regulation doesn't really manage to strike Jeff Besos. We also have to improve the structures that enforce work laws.

I was thinking the same thing.

I expect some of the weavers in the nineteenth century thought the same thing.

if we gave everyone a cheap 3d printed home with a vegetable garden, they wouldnt need to work construction jobs to prove their right to exist.

Cheap construction equals higher profitability. Profit before people, but this video tries to spin it otherwise. The UK is still blighted with the mistakes of the fifties concrete revolution.

No it isnt.

And all that ppl, which work like a builders... where they will get 3$ daily if their will be without job :D There will lost too much ppl job in early future... I have no clue, what we will do with that.