you are a genius

Lol.

Thank you.

IN THIS PHYSICAL UNIVERSE : Do you believe photons of light , are just tiny little quantum physical particles of energy , claimed to be massless ; even though they interact physically with solids through energy transference , bending , reflecting & absorbing ?

Er...No. False model.

Thanks for the compliment about my video. I am glad you like it.

Glad my video was helpful. Thanks.

It’s just a shame it was all wrong! I guess you wasted your time learning something false! It’s OK, you can blame faulty science by Mitchellson Morley in the experimental design flaw in their linear light speed experiment, and Albert Einstein’s goof with special relativity as a result. Ahh well, most will not see or believe it even if shown the error of their ways!

@@ianmoone2359 Very well. Now please explain what is the true theory, and if you write that the Earth is flat - just don't reply.

Odyseusz Koskiniotis Mitchellson Morleys linear light speed experiment was fundamentally flawed in its design. It employed a light beam split into 2 beams by passing through a 50% silvered mirror at 45 degrees to create 2 light beams travelling at right angles to each other. The experiment was designed to determine if there was any effect of the ether of space upon the speed of light travelling in 2 different directions at 90 degrees to each other for equidistant length. Up to here the theory / experimental design was sound. Next, to measure the speed of each beam of light, they employed 100% silvered mirrors to return the light beams on their original path back to the interferometer, and look to see if there was any phase shift (toward the red spectrum) of either beam to show a variation in the speed of light in either beam. What they found was that the speed was the same in both beams (& was ~186000 miles /second, or 3x10^8 meters/ second squared ie 9x10^16 meters / second). The conclusion they erroneously reached was that the ether of space either had no effect on the speed of light or that the ether of space didn’t exist, & that the speed of light is constant. They chose that the ether of space didn’t exist! And the missing mass of the Universe vanished! Because the ether of space does exist. I’ll use a nautical example with two equal speed boats as a similie to explain the obvious experimental design flaw - where the boats are photons of light A & B & the water is the ether of space. In a Stillwater lake situation 2 identical boats leave a common point and travel in opposite directions at the same speed for half an hour, turn around 180 degrees and travel back at again the same speed and simple math says they each arrive back to the common starting point at the same time! However, When we put those same two boats in a river flowing to the sea at say 10 knots. They each start at a common point, and boat A travels upstream for one half hour at 20 knots, it will only make 10knots over ground (the river bed) for half an hour or 5 nautical miles because it’s battling a head current of 10 knots travelling in the opposite direction. When after that half hour & 5 nautical miles it turns around and travels at 20 knots back towards it’s starting point - it will now be making 30 knots over ground (river bed) because it’s now being assisted by the 10 knot current and will cover 15 nautical miles, or 10 nautical miles past it’s starting point downstream. So in that remaining half hour it will travel 15 nautical miles overshooting it’s start point by 10 nautical miles. Boat B that starts out downstream assisted by the 10 knots current, will thus be doing 30 knots combined speed over ground, for half an hour & travel 15 nautical miles toward the rivermouth. Then it will turn around 180 degrees and fight the head current of 10 knots making its speed over ground only 10 knots for half an hour or 5 nautical miles upstream and undershoot its original starting point by 10 nautical miles in the downstream direction. The two boats will meet at that same point at the same time after 1 hour but the meeting point will be 10 nautical miles downstream from their common starting point which is the 10 knots effect of the river current. If we average their individual speeds over ground (Boat A = 5 nautical miles upstream + 15 nautical miles downstream in one hour = 20 knots average speed) Boat B travels 15 nautical miles downstream + then battles back upstream for 5 nautical miles = total 20 nautical miles in one hour equals 20 knots average speed! Each boat was both assisted by the current, and then battled upstream against the current. Boat A battled first Boat B battled second but their average speed was the same, just as in the Stillwater lake example. By returning along their path the effect of the current in the river is averaged out! Both identical boats averaged the same speed 20 knots because they are identical boats after all - but in these two examples the lake water & river water are the same (even tho we know the lake is still water & the river is flowing at 10 knots so they are different, but the experiment doesn’t show that!)., the average speeds are identical in both examples. The affect if any of the current is “hidden” by virtue of the effect of turning around 180 degrees to reverse course! In the Mitchellson Morley experiment, the boats are the 2 light beams, turning around 180 degrees is the two 100% silvered mirrors used to return the light beams to the interferometer upon their original path “averages out” any effect on the speed of light such that any observable affect of the Ether of space (river current) is effectively hidden! Go back to the boat in river example and half the elapsed time to only half an hour, and boat A only makes it 5 nautical miles upstream, while boat B makes it 15 nautical miles downstream! Boat A = 10 knots speed over ground, Boat B = 30 knots speed over ground! But both boats are identical. The extra 20 knots speed over ground on boat B is attributable to the 10 knot current in the river! Mitchellson Morleys linear light speed experiment assumed incorrectly that the speed of light is constant (which it isn’t if the ether of space through which it passes is itself moving ( has current). The AVERAGE speed of light (just like the average speed of the two boats) might be 186,000 miles per second, but that doesn’t mean it’s constant. Einstein seized upon Mitchellson Morleys flawed linear light speed experiment design flaw conclusions that light speed is constant & that there is no ether of space, and concocted his non peer reviewed “theory of special relativity” e=mc^2. In doing so he totally ignored a mathematical law that any 14 year old math student who paid attention knows! Any negative integer when squares yields a positive outcome. -2 squared =+4. For e=mc^2 to be true, a single photon of light must be able to travel both east (-ve) at C & West (+ve) at the same time! 🙄 Clearly paradoxical! Some will say that light is a wave form, and can thus travel east and west at the same time, BUT they can’t explain how that wave propagates across non inertial space! Return the ether & maybe they are right, but not without it! 😜 Any system of logic that commenced with a false premise will yield a paradoxical outcome! Example:- Premise 1. All dogs have 4 legs. (True), Premise 2. All 4 legged animals are cats! (false). Therefore;- All dogs are cats, Or All cats are dogs! Clearly paradoxical. In Einstein’s special relativity theorem, the paradox is called the “Twin Paradox”. Google it. So Mitchellson Morley goofed & Einstein compounded on their errors. Mathematically there is ONLY one speed for light that makes e=mc^2 correct. That speed is infinity! The speed of light is infinite, it might be infinitely fast or infinitely slow but it AVERAGES 186,000 miles per second, it certainly isn’t constant! Infinity squared is infinity! The ether of space appears to be dragged along with the planets at the same rotational velocity as the planets that spin and orbit within it much like a “space blanket”. You can google the solar tea cup analogy for an explanation of that! Your welcome. No flat earthier here, just someone who won’t accept junk science, just because everyone else does! Einstein said e=mc^2 Bearden said e= Delta Tc^2 Resolving by multiplying each side by the inverse of c^2 (1/c^2), we get M = Delta T Mass = Change in Time! Or There’s as much energy in Mass (splitting the atom) as there is in Time. One second of time is approx 9x10^16 joules per second. The time bomb will be equally as devastating as the atom / nuclear bomb. Again your welcome. M=Delta T is the GUT ( Grand Unification Theorem). 😉👍🇦🇺t

And silence is the response, because anyone with even half a brain can see that my explanation makes 100% truth & cannot be argued against! The truth has a habit of being self evident! Albert Einstein’s own university professor Dr Hendrik Lorentz always referred to Einstein’s special relativity theorem in mock derision as “Einstein’s Theorem” because he saw the obvious negative integer squared error, and knew that had he been given the chance to peer review his former students paper it would never have been published. Einstein won his Nobel for his peer reviewed paper published on the photo electric effect. The two editors of the esteemed science journal Annerlynne De Physique published Einstein’s Avant Guarde non peer reviewed “Special Relativity” paper in the peer reviewed journal at the same time as his peer reviewed Photo Electric Effect paper for which he won his Nobel prize because there wasn’t time to send it out before the publishing deadline & they felt that because he’d won a Nobel Prize for his photo electric effects paper - that he was such a genius he had no peer. Wein & Plank went on to successful later careers in physics themselves BUT their bending of the rules about publishing non peer reviewed papers in the esteemed French physics journal has led science astray for the next 100 years. Einstein is remembered for special relativity - his biggest unwitting goof, but no one remembers his brilliant photo electric effect paper for which he won his Nobel prize! His mistake is still taught in high schools & universities to this day almost like a religious doctrine that must be accepted upon faith, even when it’s easily disproven as I have just done. And any time I do so publicly the entire world falls silent! In the world of Physics one must not point out that the emperor has no clothes! 🙄 You see this sort of stupidity is why aliens won’t speak with us! 😂😂😂👍🇦🇺

Thanks for the compliment about my video.

Cenker Şengöz Thanks for that really great compliment. I am glad to hear that you enjoy all my videos that much. I plan on making videos more frequently in the near future. Thanks again.

Cenker Şengöz Agreed The dude is not only clearly HIGHLY intelligent, but explains and illustrates to a level that is easy to grasp if you've got a decent IQ running.

Seems like a labor of love. Very altruistic.

Thanks for the compliments and I am glad my video was helpful.

The Piano is a lil Dominate in your Mix... other than That... Great Work Bra...

Archimedes Screw seems closer to me... to the forward motion of energy ,,,for the magnetic 90 to line up with Electron flow vector... up down is closer to round and round,,, Spin,,,

9:10 - would love to see this animation with two holes. I think this must be a analogy to the double gap experiment

It would be **great** if you could take some of Dr. Mills work in GUTCP and animate, say, the electron orbitsphere (as he describes it) in anticipation of the wide-spread acceptance of his theories in the upcoming years.

Женя Хуторянский

Colariboo I am glad you liked the video. Thanks.

Thanks for the compliment. I hope you are right.

Thanks for the compliment.

REALLY LOVE THE METAL MUSIC♡

yami I think it is Rush. Sounds like something that Geddy Lee would write.

@John Smith why would I?

@John Smith "3rd world shithole"... if you talk like that, i don't think anyone is really gonna be interested in your opinion because you sound like trash.

+mmmmSmegma, thanks for that really great compliment. I am glad to hear that you like my videos that much, and that they have made a positive impact. Thanks.

mmmmSmegma same here

i also agree with Spider Jerusalem

i really appreaciate their effort on making all these very clear and nice educational videos, but the only thing that I would not like for improvements are those 3D visualisation...it kinda made me motion sick...I think its because my brain is just too bad to interpret those informations, same as while I'm playing 3D video games...hate this motion sickness

Glad it was helpful. Thanks.

yessssss loved that

Lol

Darkness Rises - Daniel Robinson

Sounded like Steve Vai! My bet is he used an Ibanez

For freaking real, I'm glad someone else noticed that too!!

Thanks for the compliment.

Neomadra Thanks. I am glad you liked the explanation of refraction with the cars.

That's some real good thinking.

@Jørgen Johannessen Well the part that hits the optically denser material first does slow down compared to the other parts. Speed of light is constant 'in vacuum', in everything else it slows down by the index of refraction.

​@Jørgen Johannessen It's an analogy. How can you say it's utter nonsense? This professor is teaching people stuff for free and all you could contribute with is a toxic remark that doesn't even make any sense. The cars he used were a perfectly reasonable and clear way to visualize a rather abstract concept. If you have a problem with it then instead state exactly what your problem is and how it should be instead. You should try being more humble. You have been watching lectures by prof Lewin. Congrats. That doesn't make you omnipotent in physics. Prof. Khutoryansky is teaching concepts and physics you probably didn't even know existed. So if you're saying his analogy is "utter nonsense" you're wagering your intellect and knowledge in this area against him. I for one know where I'd put my money... But even if you are right, you could have said "Thank you for the great video! I have a problem however with the analogy with the cars ..." etc or something similar and you'd not only get a reply but also either learn something or teach someone else something. That's better than just being toxic don't you think?

Only problem is...he has it BACKWARDS...the violet and blue cars turn the most...the red the least. Who didn't catch that?

Thanks for the compliments.

@@EugeneKhutoryansky You're welcome! Anything I can do to support you and your work. :)

Thanks for the compliments.

This is of course known as 'Jerome Cooper's Syndrome', where the person applying the background music thinks he is much more important than the graphics designer or the narrator. The worst offender is the UK's BBC.

Yes ! I agree ! 😂

me too, I am so confused, I wish i could go back to school to study physics

The background drives us nuts because sound creates "frequency following response" in our brain. It's basically why our brainwaves copy sound waves and why we like music. Our eyes also control our brainwaves, it's why epileptics can have seizures from flashing light. When the waves we see visually are so relaxing but the music is irritating because it's making our brain go at a faster stimulation rate than the visual stimuli.

I liked the background music. I think it is a matter of attribution, depending on association or how you interpret it. ex: I thought the guitar music was more fitting than piano, while other people think the opposite.

Glad my video was helpful. Thanks.

Thanks for the compliment.

So do you believe in God, or in quantum mechanics?

I do believe in Quantum Mechanics. But GOD does not throw dices.

Better be good at math

I'm at physics but I'm also interested in biology

No problem bro you can still study for your personal interest apart of your field. My major is math but I do know biology a lot and I am keep studying a lot of subjects that are not even related to my field. Cuz I love learning about new things.

@@Pain-95 wanna play cod mobile with another nerd? I need good teammates

thegoodlisteners listenwell my guy you know what I have pushed my ranked from rookie to legendary in just 12 days my highest kills is 44 average is 20 in multiplayer in battle royal I win 7 out of 10 I use cordite gun. Are you good in COD Mobile. And afcourse we can play together I also need good teammates as you no in legendary rank search and destroys is annoying as a solo pusher with dumb ass clueless stupid random teammates. Since its been to months I didn’t play the game so I need to download it again send me your Profile ID and name once the download loud complete I will send you invite.

Thanks.

Thanks for the compliments.

Thanks for the compliment about my video.

Bart Kwezelstaart Thanks for that really great compliment. That is really great to hear. Thanks.

Thanks. I am glad my videos are helpful. More videos are on their way.

Thanks for the compliment about my video.

Shakir Othman Thanks for the compliment. I am glad that you like my explanations in the video.

I would like to know something kind of unrelated to the video. When an electromagnetic wave or a photon hits a particle and reflects or refracts, is the wave or photon absorbed by the particle making the particle vibrate and release a new wave or photon or does the wave or photon just bounce off in a different way? I didn’t get much of a clear answer on google.

Thanks. I am glad you like my videos.

Thanks for the compliment.

Thanks. Glad you like my videos.

Thanks for the compliment. I am glad you like my videos.

Thanks for the compliments. More videos are on their way.

Thanks for the compliment.

Quantum race cars...XD

@@Cyberplayer5 Quantum race cars with different colors and speed limits. XD

@Francis Maxino - Photons do not exist, they are just brain farts of Quantum Mechanics!

@@RobH. You can not prove it neither negate it so...

more like the tiers but yeah

Thanks for the compliments.

"When light is in its wave form, it because no one have observed it yet." That's so very bullshit. Very hard to bother explaining. Just massive *facepalm*.. Relative to our "reality", nothing exists while not being observed by consciousness; it's not waves, it doesn't actually exist whatsoever. Relative to outside our reality, nothing inside our reality ever exists, like your dream realities, our reality is entirely made up by consciousness, in parts that of you and me, consciousness entirely residing outside our reality as one and everything.

To say that a photon "can be absolutely anywhere in the universe" is a bit misleading. The wave equation gives the probability that it's instantaneous position at any given time is at a particular point along the photon's trajectory. That probability is highest at the point where everyone sort of agrees that it "really" is at that moment, and drops off discontinuously going fore and aft of that point. Theoretically it could be anywhere along that line, but not "absolutely anywhere in the universe." Another pet peeve: I hate to see the putative collapse of the waveform being taken literally. It enables too many New Agey quasireligio-pseudoscientific fever dreams about the nature of reality. The particle, behaving in a waveform-ish kind of way can't possibly know whether I'm peeking around the corner trying to catch it with it's knickers down in mid-particle-wave transformation. Maybe I just got a gnat in my eye -- it doesn't know. Good grief. It's a particle, albeit a massless and dimensionless particle, whatever that is. It pops in and out of existence instantaneously with a positional probability determined by the wave equation. So it's a particle-oid entity behaving wavishly. Clear?

@@frodorob A few minutes ago I thought I know why lightbulbs emit light... Now I'm puzzled... Thank you, guys...

@@frodorob im just commenting here so one day ill come back to this.... that was pretty deep what you guys just conversed over.

TheMrTape I feel that way but couldn’t articulate it like that seems more and more clear to me it’s the only thing that actually makes since

Thanks for the compliments and I am glad you liked my video.

Thanks for the compliment about my video. I am glad you liked it.

I am glad my video was helpful.

You are right. Light is a place of non-duality where time is 0. All is formed from light so the statement "Let there be light" is truth.

Yeah, it seems to definitely have a MAJOR key to this thing we're in on a spiritual level. It's funny, I I to be a HARD core atheist. Studying these concepts DEEP, and I mean I've got them down and know what the mainstream says, and what fringe theories say. Along with some personal experiences and deep thought I know am 100% there is a "creator force" that seems to be basically pure love/ light energy and creation. I don't know, that's just a glimpse of what I saw, other things raised so many more questions but did give me a whole new level to view the world. I like it much better.

Jackieception Interesting you bring that up. I had a POWERFUL epiphany the other day about that exact concept.

Keylanos Lokj No, as light can "be" a wave or collapsed particle.

Keylanos Lokj Show me your source on this, as particles exist as waves and collapse to particles...

Thanks for the compliments. I am glad you like my visualizations.

How fast a wave is oscillating is its frequency! Well, frequency across time rather than frequency across space

@@olbluelips Energy of wave would be then time frequency multiplied by amplitude. However, energy could be Ability of wave to interface with matter. There could be high amplitude and high time frequency, yet impact on matter particles could be less. Lower amplitude and lower time frequency may impact matter harshly. Example, air being fast has less impact on a rock as compared to slower water waves due to lack of interface. In quantum world everything is waves, and Energy could be maximum interface/impact in minimum possible time, without compromising self properties (much).

@@olbluelips also, finding wave energy is tricky, depends on observation device... observations also affect reality.

Thanks for the compliment.

It might be the music, which is a bit off-putting, even for a musical omnivore like me. Yevgeny: May I suggest retiring the symphonic warhorses, and trying out solo instrumental works, like Eric Satie, Bach solo violin, at a lower volume (!)?

Thanks.

Thanks for the compliment about my video.

Thanks. Glad you like my video and thanks for the compliment.

I agree not a good match.

I like the metal music. So well arranged! lol

It feels like I watched medieval movie. I liked it

I kinda like it! It was stuck in my head actually I was just thinking bout that

She taught us psychology too 😂

I thnk the background music makes it better and the level at times is a little high but thats not bad since they have long gaps between the voice overs. There is more time without voice than with it so music makes sense. Its essentially subjective and the person doing the music was more than likely the same person who made the whole thing and hired Kira Vincent Davis. Your subjective opinions are not shared by all.

12:23 😄 that songs on Mr. Robot isnt it?

@@whatabouttheearth Relax, I’ve never had the claim to express a generality. Even in the form of a wave 😅😉

Thanks. Hope you like all of my videos.

Thanks for the compliment about my video.

I am totally aggred☺

Thanks for the compliments about my video. I am glad you liked it.

Glad to hear my video was helpful. Thanks.

Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.

Thanks.

Thanks.

***** Thanks. It is nice to hear that you enjoy my videos that much.

Thanks for the compliment.

Thanks.

#BOOM #BOW

Lmao duhh duhh

Higher frequency/oscillation also have more area under the curve?