In World War II two weapons outgunned the rest. The German MG34 and it's update the 42. Belt fed these weapons guzzled ammo easily outgunning smaller capacity magazine based rivals.
Пікірлер: 581
@SpaceHitler7 жыл бұрын
My favorite weapon of all time...
@davonteadams47884 жыл бұрын
💯%
@themysteriousmaster87553 жыл бұрын
😳
@Ozan_Dread3 жыл бұрын
Same❤
@zombies4evadude243 жыл бұрын
Bonesaw go: *BrRrRrRrRrRrRr*
@murinus87633 жыл бұрын
"Bone saw"
@Klendathu_Hotdrop4 жыл бұрын
0:34 "careful Hans, zis is our last ammo bel... aaand its gone!"
@tansanbotilya14434 жыл бұрын
How underrated... Totally deserved more likes
@zombies4evadude243 жыл бұрын
Nein, das ist nicht gut. Rückzug!
@DachlatteFN3 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣👍
@krangster6583Ай бұрын
LOL
@sirajdevil8 жыл бұрын
the buzzsaw! probably the meanest sounding nickname given to a gun
@mardiffv.87758 жыл бұрын
Or Hitler's zipper as it was also called.
@mitchellvliem62006 жыл бұрын
BlackToothGrin both are true
@trxiyker78283 жыл бұрын
I heard that "Hitlers Buzzsaw" is a common Nickname in America
@zombies4evadude243 жыл бұрын
@@mardiffv.8775 With different context “Hitler’s Zipper” takes on a whole new meaning...
@mxblyxky8 жыл бұрын
The high rate of fire of the MG42 and its distinctive sound caused panic all troops from all countries who fought against the Germans in WW2, due to mutilations caused by it. The Americans had to create a manual with psychological instructions for official orientate the troops; however the fear of gun persisted to the end.
@Legomax182 жыл бұрын
Anyone know where to find this manual?
@mxblyxky2 жыл бұрын
@@Legomax18 I don't know where it can be found; it can also be a reserved series of service orders; but the fact is that the US Army was keen to try to neutralize the negative effect of the sound caused by the high rate of fire of the MG42, as many soldiers did not move from their positions after hearing the bursts. It is known that one of the tactics used to decrease the fear of MG42 was to tell soldiers that the weapon was not efficient; but of course, the mutilated bodies of those who fell said otherwise. The fear of MG42 reached all allied nations. Even the soldiers of the Brazilian Expeditionary Force who fought the Germans up the mountain in Northern Italy remember very well the peculiar sound of their bursts.
@Legomax182 жыл бұрын
@@mxblyxky Fascinating. There’s no limit to what one can learn about WWII. Sad that the firsthand accounts and word-of-mouth tales are growing exponentially more faint with each passing day, as the last of those guys and the Greatest Gen rapidly disappear. Anyway… definitely didn’t expect a reply to a 5 year old comment. Thx for the info. You’re badass!
@mxblyxky2 жыл бұрын
@@Legomax18 I know the style. It's the "Boy from Hollywood"! He got used to seeing in films and "documentaries" the heroic allies to win whenever they are angry to see their "heroes" discredited. Same with Sherman. The denial Hollywood boys were outraged to learn that the tank was a coffin on tracks in front of German armor. Only in recent years has this been revealed through the testimony of veterans. This vulnerability was covered up so as not to discourage the crews and not cause a scandal, as more than fifty thousand were produced. My boy is now doubting that the MG42 was a weapon that instilled terror, as this, for obvious reasons, was covered up during the war and remained so later. Do you know what a machine gun that fires 1200 rounds per minute does to a body? It can tear off arms, head and cuts the body like a chainsaw. That was the psychological effect on the soldiers who had to advance against her. The Reichfürer Himmler felt ill and had to withdraw as he watched a public demonstration in Prague of hostages being executed by on MG42 in reprisal for the killing of germans soldiers by guerrillas. Pieces of bodies and limbs were torn off with the hostages still alive.
@klutzspecter34702 жыл бұрын
I think they were more concerned about not getting their ass shot to hell than the sound.
@اااعجاز8 жыл бұрын
I Love MG42 now and Always
@mardiffv.87758 жыл бұрын
MG42 is around today as the MG3 in 7,62 X 51mm Nato ammo. Spain produced a 5,56 X 45mm version of the M42. The only drawback was regular cleaning of the gun, because dirt and dust could jam the MG42. Now it is being replaced by a MG from HK.
@starboydevil99296 жыл бұрын
haven't you heard of MG3?
@samuelkenny3756 жыл бұрын
King Ijaz Malik me too
@اااعجاز2 жыл бұрын
@@starboydevil9929 No
@ReptilianAnusWizzard2 жыл бұрын
My grandpa loved it also
@SMVB-cl6oc8 жыл бұрын
German weapons and design in world war 2 outclassed all their rivals. panzer kpw 5 panther, mg42 , the first jet fighters.
@SMVB-cl6oc8 жыл бұрын
***** agreed.
@BewareOfTheKraut8 жыл бұрын
+plebion kangaroo Don't forget the first guided bomb "Fritz X".
@Sundara2298 жыл бұрын
+plebion kangaroo but they still lost.
@Sundara2298 жыл бұрын
***** Wow. Just kidding dude. Besides that, taking and studying others technology happend everywhere at anytime in human history. So i dont care about some paperclips and smth.
@cptant76108 жыл бұрын
+plebion kangaroo B29 bomber, Essex class aircraft carrier, proximity fuse, atomic bomb. German tech is only superior in WW2 if you blatantly ignore all the areas the Allies were ahead in. And no they didn't steal the atom bomb designs from the Germans, the Germans completely wasted the pre-war advantage they had in that field.
@kj4ilk8 жыл бұрын
If i remember correctly the MG42 was the fastest MG of ww2
@beantownjunkie778 жыл бұрын
It's still the fastest. Just over 1000 rounds per minute. We don't have anything close to that even now. It was an amazing weapon
@SilverlaneGaming8 жыл бұрын
Joshua is right. And in addition: You don't have to replace the barrel so often. The MG42 has a mechanism to change the barrel as fast as possible. There are machine guns with higher rate of fire, BUT they all have more than one barrel. Like the Minigun and GSh-6-23 you mentioned
@SilverlaneGaming8 жыл бұрын
+Joshua Chita Ah. Thanks, never heared about that weapon ;-)
@carlosperry43017 жыл бұрын
kjilk simble maybe today too
@kj4ilk7 жыл бұрын
maybe..
@zessjh335 жыл бұрын
I use MG-42 sound to wake up my American friends and use Stuka’s sound to wake up British Friends.
@gaborkiss14255 жыл бұрын
i bet you are really popular with them :D
@zombies4evadude243 жыл бұрын
@Ok Ok yeah, we Americans like to puff up our egos, but let’s not forget who got to Berlin first...
@zombies4evadude243 жыл бұрын
@larrywize 5 I mean if Hitler just waited a few years until after Britain was defeated and U.S. coaxed to their side, then Germany wouldn’t have to fight 2 fronts at once, not to mention the Russian winter screwed things over too. Blitzkrieg could’ve been effective in the summer but they rushed in way too damn early and the Russians punished them severely for it (Oversimplified reference not intended).
@JohnSmith-lf4be Жыл бұрын
@@zombies4evadude24 Soviets were preparing to conquer all of Europe before operation barbarosa.
@tB3o3tR9o9 Жыл бұрын
phone ring tone or what?
@ThatGuy-qw7ie5 жыл бұрын
German engineering at it's best
@maribelparado42223 жыл бұрын
@no use for a name ilove germans
@kaietaniya44473 жыл бұрын
Germans are nice Until it comes to war
@jasonholdem68143 жыл бұрын
usa still kicked your ass in ww2 with inferior weapons. its because we have.....what is it they call it?......testicles.
@hms_dreadnought19363 жыл бұрын
@@jasonholdem6814 No, because Hitler was an idiot and started battles with too many fractions and Germany was overwhelmed by them. If Hitler was a better warlord, the germans might have defended France or at least Germany from the allies. But let’s just be glad that didn’t happen.
@AzizDoufikar22803 жыл бұрын
@no use for a name And the British troops in the video couldn't even raise his head lmao.
@cptant76108 жыл бұрын
I have always felt that the MG34 was the real game changer and that the MG42 was more an evolutionary improvement of the design.
@josefmengele181 Жыл бұрын
Based comment
@blutrache19 Жыл бұрын
To an extent, yes. But the MG34, with its very well structured (too "sleek and mechanised") parts and components need constant care from the elements - snow, cold, dirt, water, etc. that most needed to be disassembled often. It IS one of the best handheld weapons of WW2, at least before the introduction of the 42 and Stg 44 (both of which came too late for the Germans). Nevertheless, these are all a witness and proof of German engineering superiority.
@andik859 Жыл бұрын
Grund war auch das MG 34 zu teuer war und in der Fertigung zu aufwendig. Das MG 42 aus Blechstanzteilen war schneller und billiger herzustellen.
@kostas2302597 жыл бұрын
opponents be like oh fuck not you again
@jerrybutrustyboi68665 жыл бұрын
Amarica: we ceated a machine gun that can fire 450 rounds a min Germany: hold my beer
@@MrHKN76 I wasnt meant to be mean, i just said it in English
@MrHKN764 жыл бұрын
@@cheddar_6614 ok no problem 👍
@Mr.fox136867 жыл бұрын
one of the strongest army in modern history.
@filthymcnastyazz Жыл бұрын
Beaten twice
@Adonnus100 Жыл бұрын
Strongest army. Wars won: 0
@cxercxesjaen29057 жыл бұрын
MG42 + NEST = GG
@Gulpman18 жыл бұрын
I can understand the feeling of the soldiers meeting the MG42 fight during the second world war.
@tarasb.ukrainian19477 жыл бұрын
awesome Germans!
@EternalMuscovite4 жыл бұрын
Thx
@SculptingMinds3 жыл бұрын
after 4 Years
@centurymemes12087 жыл бұрын
1:07 that epic Accent
@fortnutz-gaming88357 жыл бұрын
Lmao British accent is so adorable
@evillain9996 жыл бұрын
haha i was just about to mention it
@s.ballert5 жыл бұрын
Faayae
@s.ballert3 жыл бұрын
Found my own comment again lol
@MW-lw5mn6 жыл бұрын
Yeah the 42 had real satisfying ability. Not only it was usable and good to handle. Even its enormous rpm.
@Toni1120079 жыл бұрын
"MG42 isn't as accurate as the Browning tho" Only it has superior accuracy to browning.
@Toni1120079 жыл бұрын
Thành Hoàng Ngọc Mg 42 is still more accurate than browning tho.
@USMarineRifleman03118 жыл бұрын
+Firmus Piett Which Browning? There were literally 3 used during WW2. The watercooled M1917 was the most accurate HMG of the war in the 7.62 caliber, due to its weight and a sturdy tripod. The M1919 also benefitted from a tripod. The M2 HMG also made by Browning was a .50 BMG HMG that could double the range of the MG42. All 3 were made from solid steel parts. The MG42 was stamped steel with sights on the receiver and a barrel that detached. That alone does not spell accuracy.
@Chickenassable8 жыл бұрын
+Cpl. A. Gadway USMC all of them....MG42>Browning
@mightza37818 жыл бұрын
The MG42 was a squad level weapon for a 13 man squad, not a company or platoon level weapon for every 80-250 soldiers like a browning. That's why the video compared it to the BAR and Bren which which was the Allied squad level weapon for every 12 men. The MG42 still exists in the MG3 and M60, so you know it's good.
@andro78628 жыл бұрын
+US Marine Rifleman The brownings were heavy and slow, MG42 is my choice.
@franzluth6 жыл бұрын
German technology is always 👌 in my opinion.
@kreativitasku50483 жыл бұрын
Mercedes Benz and BMW
@combat-kirschiihrr...31997 жыл бұрын
Hundreds! ...These MG42 have taken more than 180000 soldiers from their fear in Normandy. Rest in peace...
@mattbaker9597 жыл бұрын
hell, the Germans were also experimenting the first stealth fighter....think about how advanced they would of been if they didn't attack the soviet union and controlled Europe still
@fmi0057 жыл бұрын
Matt Baker they also had the first guided bomb
@hp20847 жыл бұрын
They had a few guided bombs not just the Fritz-x. They were also experimenting on radio guided SAMs.
@Abensberg6 жыл бұрын
no... we wouldnt have that if we didnt attack russia our tanks were way worse in 1941 pz.3 with short 5cm gun? pz4 with short 7,5 infantry-gun? 5cm AT-gun? advanced weapons need an superior enemy to counter so if the war stopped in 1940, there would NEVER have been a tiger, panther, mg42 and so on because it wouldnt have been needed same with aircrafts a lot planes were designed in a desperate way to counter allied superiority
@peterson70826 жыл бұрын
Except they weren't. Nor were they advanced relative to enemy countries.
@peterlustig68886 жыл бұрын
Nathan Peterson Ofcourse they were. What about stating some counter arguments?
@upgraded7527 Жыл бұрын
dude, imagine being a German engineer and finding a way to improve an already amazing gun into another gun like itself but cheaper and way better
@myfavoritepointguard4463 жыл бұрын
Everybody a gangsta till normandy starts to speak *MG42*
@Repoocn3 жыл бұрын
Heinrich Severloh .. The tru example of how lethal the mg42 is
@mauriciomorais78187 жыл бұрын
Can I have one? I wanna unleash a tsunami of lead
@mauriciomorais78187 жыл бұрын
Kevlar Fox Forty Thousand?!!? Shit, I didn't think it would cost more than five thousand! I'm saving to buy a car. Hitler's buzzsaw will have to wait.
@biver18783 жыл бұрын
The German soldier on d-day was named Heinrich Severloh and he shot around 1000-2000 people in a time span of 9 hours. Imagine, he sat there 9 hours long, killing people. He was very traumatised…
@tB3o3tR9o9 Жыл бұрын
i did not knew him, but he lived in my district until his death. in a documentary, when he met a american D-Day survivor, he told under tears, that he's sorry for all that and that it haunted him for the rest of his life.
@kathyf1237 жыл бұрын
More than half the video clips are of the MG34. not the Mg42.
@MustangDesudiroz5 жыл бұрын
1:08 Stunning volume of faya
@MachineGunMike4 жыл бұрын
Talks about MG42. Mostly shows footage of MG34.
@thelostprofessor83536 жыл бұрын
just to clear things up, the mg42 and m2 browning were developed to suit 2 completely different doctrines. Therefore neither was really better. The m2 browning was meant as an antiaircraft and light anti vehicle weapon. It was not a general usage mg like the mg42. The soviet 12.7 dshk mg is a more realistic comparison. Furthermore as I said the mg42 was meant as a cheap general usage mg that could be used in infantry, antiaircraft, vehicle mounted, and static roles. It was not meant or used for taking out light vehicles. It had a better chance again ground attack aircraft but i cant say anything about its effectiveness in that role.
@tricepsish7 жыл бұрын
16 relatives of Gis and Red army soldiers disliked this video #mowndown
@peterlee46822 жыл бұрын
I heard it was 19,000 rounds not 12,000. He was at it ALL DAY. A weapon that fires at 1,500 rpm. That's less than 13 minutes of continuous fire....
@kitchentrout58676 жыл бұрын
It’s difficult to imagine facing something like this as many many allied forces did. Scary shit.
@mitchhammond32138 жыл бұрын
Best light machine gun of ww2
@MandenTV7 жыл бұрын
The Third Reich was technologically magnificent. Everyone always makes fun of them for losing the war even with these amazing (for the time) weapons. But what people fail to take into account is how many enemies Germany was facing. What's amazing is how long they held out.
@edstar835 жыл бұрын
Everyone was pretty much against them and they were still ahead until America was forced into the war. Up until then Americans were pro Germans. To me the Germans were the best soldiers of WWII.
@headhunter1945 Жыл бұрын
@@edstar83 The Soviets turned the tide, not the Americans, just look up casualty rates by front, West vs East. Yet despite being outnumbered between 1:2 and 1:3 most of the time, the Germans inflicted nearly 5:1 kill ratios on the Soviets. Anyway, by the end of '44, 2.7M Germans had died on the Eastern front, while only 0.3M died to the Western Allies. So I agree with you in general - just a little comment to people coming after reminding of the large role the Soviets played here.
@gratefulguy4130 Жыл бұрын
@@headhunter1945 lol the Soviets never could have held out without lend-lease. Stalin & Kruschev are among the many Soviet commanders who admitted as much multiple times.
@EngPheniks4 жыл бұрын
Modern Marine: Gosh, Afghanistan is horrible. Omaha beach survivor: Hold my beer 🍺
@sushmajamwal13856 жыл бұрын
MG42 such a dangerous machine gun
@devonmartinski65964 жыл бұрын
Germany had everything necessary to win a major war: technology, manpower, engineering, leadership. its Achilles heel? natural resources
@iansmith89442 жыл бұрын
Don’t forget leadership that couldn’t cooperate
@vsboy25777 жыл бұрын
the ss units had no mercy with high rate fire missions
@stegtflaesk5 жыл бұрын
Still getting used today In the mg3 variant. However chambered in 7.62 instead of 7.92 with 300 less rpm.
@hb91454 жыл бұрын
Turning the rate of fire a little lower was not a bad idea.
@simonyip59784 жыл бұрын
It's strange that both Germany and Japan were able to take on half of the world between them and even though they were completely defeated, within decades they were richer than most of the countries that had actually won the war. It shows that national character and the spirit of the people are very very important in how a country will end up becoming. The Chinese have the national characteristics of being very independent and hardworking and self confident and their ancient history and their recent history shows those traits time and time again. The oldest continous civilization and now the second biggest economy in the world couldn't be achieved by most other nations.
@gratefulguy4130 Жыл бұрын
Well when it comes to China they were propped up deliberately.
@akashsavangade5185 жыл бұрын
MG-42 a nightmare to allied soldiers....
@kellychuang83733 жыл бұрын
Oh yeah that also a fact and can really get up and go with that weapon too.
@DESIBOY-fe7nm6 жыл бұрын
Perfect weapon for blitzkrieg attack
@kingoftheskies64252 жыл бұрын
THE MG42 IS IN STAR WARS BATTLEFRONT 2 CALLED THE VALKEN 38 X
@hans.Guitars2 жыл бұрын
Much satisfying sound than a MG42 1:07 "stunning volume of fire"
@robscott82963 жыл бұрын
I love the gun but it has its downs 1. It could overheat very easily if ya don’t know how to handle it and fire it in bursts of course but this can be over looked 2. It eats up ammo like popcorn 3. (This can be a positive or a negative depending on the person) it has a strong recoil 4. If fired for long time and ya need to move up ya can’t pick it up unless you want to end up with 3rd degree burns on your hand
@pradyumn26922 жыл бұрын
It looks so beautiful. Like a magic wand.
@grabakasennin27637 жыл бұрын
Lindybeige disliked this video
@samuelkenny3756 жыл бұрын
the terrifying German mg42 in Omaha beach bunker
@kj4ilk8 жыл бұрын
The only gun with a semi close rate of fire would have been the Russian PPSH42
@MashedJoetatoes8 жыл бұрын
I believe its max rate of fire was actually 1,000 rounds/ minute.
@user-bw1zh2yb1q7 жыл бұрын
so higher or lower quality equals higher rpm?
@eduardobaccaroschrepel4035 Жыл бұрын
Soldados alemães, os melhores da 2 guerra mundial.
@ryanlikesdietcoke8 жыл бұрын
Thanks for uploading these types of videos LightningWar
@JundaComputersGmbH5 жыл бұрын
My favourite gun in Battlefield V!
@didickcheeseburger5 жыл бұрын
i cant help but feel like our govt thought our soldiers lives were cheap sending them onto the beaches of normandy against the mg42 like that.
@zombies4evadude243 жыл бұрын
Wouldn’t be the first time, nor the last. *vietnam flashbacks*
@methylene5 Жыл бұрын
Random internet person: MG-42 is the best gun ever. Phased plasma rifle with 40 watt ranging: Hold my beer.
@D.W.6605 жыл бұрын
Made In Germany
@jamesebola12506 жыл бұрын
You never mention the fact these machine guns would quickly overheat. Needing rest and barrel replacement.
@swunt104 жыл бұрын
which takes less time then to change the belt so it was not a big deal
@jamesebola12504 жыл бұрын
@@swunt10 You never fired this gun, have you? Especially not under fire and battle stress.
@swunt104 жыл бұрын
@@jamesebola1250 neither did you so shut up
@jamesebola12504 жыл бұрын
@@swunt10 My father and two of his brothers used them on Germans during WW II.
@swunt104 жыл бұрын
@@jamesebola1250 wow kid that clearly makes you an expert with lots of experience by association..
@UFCMania1556 жыл бұрын
depending on the pins and bolts it used, the MG42 could fire up to 2,000 rounds/min. But the MINIMUM rate of fire was 1,200 rounds/min
@peterson70826 жыл бұрын
+UFCMania155 I know of no case of that rate of fire even being attempted. 1,200 was the average maximum rate of fire achievable. Nor is that sustainable rate of fire.
@roberth.goddardthefatherof63766 жыл бұрын
No the Minimum ROF was 900 the standard was 1,200 and 2,000 is just in your Wehraboo delusions and was NEVER done Irl at 2,000 the Gun would jam in 2 seconds, it was not designed to cope with that ROF.
@TheJuan723 жыл бұрын
The M60 was a copy of the MG 42 , we trained with it in basic training.
@rsaakahexar43853 жыл бұрын
Father of machine gun...when mg42 show up the job is done😂 legendary weapons
@smw11 Жыл бұрын
I was a MG51 server in the Swiss army in the 80'. The Swiss MG51 is essentially a copy of the MG42 just a Rolex edition Absolutely a great MG but at a rate of 1200 S/sec , 30 sec of fire were 30Kg to carry around (7.5 caliber) , the MG and the tripod were another 16 and 26kg +another 10kg of extra equipment don't be fooled that's a lot of weight to carry as such they don't make any sense in modern context
@96_stars224 жыл бұрын
They don't call it a buzz saw for nothing
@caelanshpak20078 ай бұрын
In my opinion the mg's 42 biggest flaw was its rate of fire 1500 rounds per minute you would burn through ammo so quickly you'd be out before you know it and that gun would melt in no time the amount of ammo they would have to make and bring just to keep up with the rate of fire seems enormous but that's just my opinion
@just-sumdude68234 жыл бұрын
Imagine this, some guys who came out of a the treaty of Versailles, then make technological advancements against you
@zombies4evadude243 жыл бұрын
Versailles, verdammt! Nein, das ist schlecht. Sehr schlecht zwar.
@Sassenhaim Жыл бұрын
Lynette was Arjen back then , recognised the voice immediately
@NihilistGhost5 жыл бұрын
Heinrich Severloh welcoming the Invaders of Europe with his MG42.
@danielnavarro5373 жыл бұрын
Good weapon. Overall good infantry weapon that hone on the tactics of infantry. Just overall couldn't keep up with the might of the Allies.
@ProjectStrum Жыл бұрын
Facts ! Finally a expert saying 1500 rpm and not 1200 like every other noob.if the mg3 is a slowed down version of the 42 with a cyclic rate of 1200 then...he knows.
@daveyboy_2 жыл бұрын
0:18 i've seen that guy in a few docs before . That Atwater guy also
@StrixWar5 жыл бұрын
One thing I hate about when people talk about Normandy they never talk about the other countries that helped out like Canada was a main part of winning that battle
@NotCondorTheBird5 жыл бұрын
1:40 yah i don't blame u man, shit must be brutally loud in a window
@williamthegreat96325 жыл бұрын
I know one thing that could out gun a mg 42, a ppsh41 may not be a lmg, but like the mg42 it has a very very fast fire rate
@headhunter1945 Жыл бұрын
True that it does have a high ROF. The MG42 as issued with the standard bolt from the start of WW2 had a firing rate of 1,500, the PPSH had a firing rate of 1,250. By the end of the war they also made heavier bolts available, so some of them fired "only" at 1,200 rpm. Beyond that, though, the PPSH fires a pistol size round (about 700J of energy) while the MG42 fires a full sized round, and a powerful one (4,100J energy) at that. Lastly, the maximum effective firing rate of the MG42 is 3,500m (3,828 yd) when outfitted with tripod and telescopic sight, while the max effective firing range of the PPSH is 250m (273 yd).
Bren: brrrrrrt..................brrrrrrrrrt................brrrrrrrrt........ MG42: (yawn, hold my belt) rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
@EngelinZivilBO2 жыл бұрын
Sargent: Heinz, when they are knee deep in the water, you have to shoot
@drummnjar55262 жыл бұрын
Better than new mg's. Germany, Austria, Sweden, Croatia (partially) are still using it in 2022. And no i am not talking about MG3, i am talking about genuine ww2 era MG42. Of course that 90% of bundeswehr LMG's are MG3, however .. there are still more than 60 units using MG42. Difference is mainly in caliber and in rate of fire. MG3 is 7.62x51 nato and has 1000-1200rpm rate of fire. MG42 is chambered in 7.92x57 (8mm Mauser) and has 1400-1700rpm rate of fire.
@elitecaps10175 жыл бұрын
I bet soldiers danced when they were lit up by the mg42
@JohnFleming-sw7hn3 ай бұрын
So in this Death Wish 3 1985 Charles Bronson film! Someone a junkyard owner had a couple machine guns from world war 2 and Browning M1919 and a MG42! When he tried to shoot a mg42 it didn't fire and got over jumped on by the gangs! If so anyone why didn't his mg42 work in that film scene? Thanks!
@AndresGonzalez-qn2kv3 жыл бұрын
this killed more americans than McDonald's
@stefan54692 ай бұрын
1:08 this looks like a 150-200rounds belt… gone just in 3seconds
@gnarmarmilla4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for posting this bro
@impsimp3 жыл бұрын
Audie Murphy: I’m going to take their precious MG42 and end their whole career.
@heinz-josefostholt2445 жыл бұрын
Geile Knarre,😄 brauch ich für die nächste Lohnverhandlung!!
@scott-o33456 жыл бұрын
"....Machine guuuun, tearin' my body all apart......."
@keizibates4 жыл бұрын
Where can you find ww2 footage of the mg42 in action anybody?
@alexsanchez36353 жыл бұрын
🔥MG-42 Pure hell🔥
@alexamerling793 жыл бұрын
My favorite weapon ever.
@michaelsuarez11263 жыл бұрын
Mg42 inspired american m60 gp machine gun!
@Geoffrey6_3 жыл бұрын
But it never outgunned Mg42
@yoyouk26976 жыл бұрын
I use this gun in call of duty world war 2
@heinzrombke95682 жыл бұрын
Its no wonder that the Red Army called the MG42 the Hitler Saw.
@tiagomonteiro130 Жыл бұрын
The Germans called it the bone saw
@heinzrombke95689 ай бұрын
It@@tiagomonteiro130
@kaietaniya44473 жыл бұрын
British - “ why do I hear boss music “
@UselessNekoGang5 жыл бұрын
0:18 oh look, it’s the guy who randomly decided he wanted to be a woman.
@swunt104 жыл бұрын
yeah lol
@StromBugSlayer4 жыл бұрын
Make you wonder about the switch to the M-27.
@Rayven-gi3os3 жыл бұрын
“American troops land on Omaha and Normandy”
@Generalpmmttoriginal6 жыл бұрын
mg 42.... but the half of the shown guns are mg 34...