The Mosque of Paris, build to honor the muslim troops who fought during the first world war, also saved some jews during the Occupation.

So how come a larger % of Jews in Germany are still around compared to those in Morocco?

@@huriale1617 This is part of our religion to disavow and fight tyrants such as hitler

@@owenm.1282 and yet so many are cheering for the massacre of Jews

the last righteous king of morocco

Wtf a signifiant majority of french and british colonial subjects fought against the nazis. What's this kind of historical revisionism ? Anybody can litteraly compare the numbers of muslim troops on both sides (or the number of western troops on the axis), the numbers of medails gained by the muslim troops, etc.

That’s not even remotely true. Islam is inherently anti-Semitic. That’s the reason.

perfect explanation.

twisted logic, Islam does the invading

@garyjohnstone6422 so ignored that the Germans were Christians and blame the muslims who fought in both sides

For west colonisation by France, Britain is good but Nazis are bad 🤡

​@@Sagar-vv9gdBoth are bad, but the Nazis were a lot lot worse.

​@@bigbootros4362France: How did you know if they were killing millions of people like me?

@@user-fl5mq9kp7g Should google what he thought about South Africans.

Mein Kampf is still quite popular in India.

it is like finland being an ally of axis. just protecting their lands from soviet union and nothing more.

@@TP_ERK Not just only against the Soviets, many of them supported the Axis against China and Britain.

Even Japan's native irregular fighters in Indonesia were commanded by islamic clerics

German-Japanese jihadism was crazy. I couldn't imagine this happening.

@@kraijom319 The Japanese did even attempt to create a pro-Japanese Islamic state in Central Asia. Long even before Hitler sought to materialise alliance with the Muslims, the Japanese nearly achieved this task. That's why during WW2, the Soviets and Chinese had to carefully patrol the region due to the pro-Japanese attitude among these Central Asian Turkomens.

That because he and the ottoman turk fought italy invasion of libya and continue helping the local resistance even after the war was lost and italy occupational.

​@@johnnyfives5416well yes, and + because itally straight up claiming territory from Turkey 💀 it wasnt just a "old rivalship". İtally was straight up threatening Turkey

Video lacks so many details, like the pogroms in Istanbul and how they were dismantled by ataturk and their leaders executed allowing the 15k Jews to come back to Istanbul to their property

You play stick war 3?

@@llamagames6803 ye

Muslims were divided in sea about the issue. Main stream nationalism hated the Japanese and Western powers. The Japanese committed genocide against some Muslim population . Those who supported the Japanese were either desperate or promised independence which was a lie.

Same arabs that turned their blind eye on the Turks

This is wrong you know that Muslims india is who started and supported to stand against colonizer, amd there is no evidence of supporting what kind of support you means? If you don't know the history of Islam qhen they ruled they did nring justice to its region and that by itself is negative side because they will think that everyone is like them you have the historical records of when Mongolia attacked them or when the al andalusia fall so you can see the full picture there

Azad Hind were Hindu Nationalists LMAO

Many of the Christian fascists opposed Hitler, and some, like Metaxas, actively fought against him and had pro British policies before the war

Short answer: yes but you cant say it cause its offensive.

@@ottopotatum5775 Short answer is no. It is so simplified, that even you can understand it.

Nasser and a few others would try to keep pan-atabic ideas going.

​@@ottopotatum5775Germany keeps recruiting volunteer battalions. They always seem to scrounge up someone from Belgium or across the Ostfront or Poland.

Also Jabzy; you've forgot to mention Greeks of the city, whom constituted %≈2 of the city's population. I also suggest you not group Alawites in with Arabs, since Alawism of Nusayris is an ethnic religion. Many Alawites, such as Hafez al-Assad's father for example, were against the annexation of the Alawi State into Syria. Many Alawites in fact voted in favor of annexation into Turkey, generally urban Alawites. Rural Alawites (then the majority of the Alawite population) did not participate in the referandum. This has the effect of magnifying the Turkish Turnout, since, at the time majority of the locals you've classified as Arabs were of Nusayri/Alawite origin.

Do Alawites consider themselves Muslims?

@@user-dy9jq4lc5y Depends on the Alawite.

@@user-dy9jq4lc5y Alawism and Alevism are completely two different things. But unfortunately very often confused due to similar names.

One mistake bud, Afrin is ethnically Kurdi including the Ezidis.

Too many foreign soldiers for a racist state if you ask me

Enemy of my Enemy is my friend (uk and france ) ​@@kazmahamza3115

@@kazmahamza3115 muslims never destroyed europe and germany that was jews

@@kazmahamza3115 non european divisions usually were just canon fodder

While of course the allies had a significant portion of the Indian Army, about ten percent of the Soviet Army and quite a sizeable French North African contingent with a smaller West African contingent, no doubt there were others in all far outnumbering those you cite.

we are 🗿

Iran means “land of Aryans”. Most descendant ethnicities of proto-indo-Europeans are Aryan by definition.

If you don't know it, you should watch a video about what the Nazis actually believed (especially Himmler). They send researchers to check if Tibetans were maybe the original Aryans.

he pretty much picked the name from Iran so that's not as surprise

Only the aristocracy

Turks already destory our friendship both against kurds italians and germans.

pLaNnEd To CrEaTe

@@NathanDudani​​⁠I’ll personally message you and link the video as soon as it is published. You’re gonna have to wait until May 2025, but i’m sure you’ll enjoy it. The dissertation proposal has already been submitted if that helps :)

It’s really intresting because the tripartite pact was more of an alliance of convenience then an actual alliance, Bulgaria also notably didn’t give its Jews to Germany

Italy is under practical German occupation at the end of the war.

It's why I'd love to see more people remove Nazism from Fascism. Nazism even predates Fascism. Nazism evolved from German Socialism and goes as far back as the 19th century meanwhile Fascism evolved from Marxist Syndicalism and evolved over the span of the Great War into a new movement. One is built around the idea of the Totalitarian Corporate State and the other a Social Democrats Racial Religion were the Bourgeoisie are the J*ws and the end goal is the racialization of the means of production. 😂

I heard some where the surname "Mussolini" derived from Muslim. ie, his ancestor was a Muslim.

@@smortv9629 In the German ideal vision, post-war Europe would have been Germany and a bunch of client states with second-class people. And others just depopulated and colonized with germans.

Italy did send geologist Ardito Desio to Libya, to search for oil and other natural resources. He did find oil and in collaboration with the Italian petroleum company Agip there were plans to begin extraction. However, this was in late 1938 and operations were suspended once Italy entered WW2

Yeah their are a bunch of fossil fuels and iron ore in Ethiopia aswell , could've helped the axis alot.

That’s straight up false Most Muslims may have fought for the Allies because they were from allied countries, but those from non allied countries, and many from allied countries, flocked to the SS Hitler’s best pall was the grand mufti of Jerusalem, who would try to finish what he started just 2 years later

@@jonathanwilliams1065 he was initially somewhat successful but ended up unsuccessful. There were very little volunteers from countries that weren’t under British and French rule and he had no reason to appeal to those who weren’t under British and French rule. I’ve meet Muslims who lived during ww2 and they weren’t pro nazi. The majority of them were actually fascinated by the soviets and the Soviet army which is what led to many Muslim countries almost becoming communist. You mean to tell me they were pro Nazi and communist at the same time? Please read or study

​@@EgyptianChiefKeefThe Soviets would keep a lot of influence in places like Egypt through the cold war. A lot of these places still have local communist or socialist parties.

@@SusCalvin Had Turkey not joined NATO, communism could have spread in the Middle East

@@jonathanwilliams1065 what do you mean by "finishing the job 2 years later" that's absolutely unrelated

Turkey didn't even fought...🦃

@@roderik3059overused joke. 0 laughs :)

@@JustYourRandomTurk Maybe I'm lying. What Turkey did in World War II?

@@roderik3059 nothing. lol. better than spending millions of dollars as a newly founded republic and losing half our population tbh

@@JustYourRandomTurk So why the hell do you writte team Germany Turkey? Ridiculous. 😂

Ataturks government post-1939?...

@@JabzyJoe yeah I posted both comments at the same time, look foward to the next episode :)

Fun fact, there were more dutch soldiers that fought for the Axis than the allies. And also the last defender's of Berlin were French SS soldiers.

​@@NobleBossThe local fascists in Belgium run a big anti-communist recruitment drive I think. They try to do the same in half-pacified Norway.

Nah we just following the latest fashions :)

No he wasn’t. His nephew Arafat continued To Fight Hitler’s war w help from Nazis who fled to Middle East.

Well, they have been trying for a century but they always walk away running off to the UN asking Israel to show restraint. Go for round 526 I suppose?

That wasn’t the thought of most people back then. Muslims and Jews lived fine and then Zionism ruined it. Most Muslims don’t hate Jews and vice versa but to paint it this way is stupid and shows you’re uneducated. Also, the state of Israel has been found guilty of numerous warcrimes and is probably going to get a very small punishment for it. Anyways, please do research before commenting something stupid.

To be honest.. The Arabs say Jews...the one who say and promoted "Zionists, not Jews" are the communists xD

What is Zionist? a supporter of Zionism; a person who believes in the development and protection of a Jewish nation in what is now Israel. how could you separate a Jewish person from this? do you think you don’t believe your own self determination and protection do you believe that you don’t deserve to exist?

@@cendistbenjamin7066 Calm down I'm a proud Israeli zionist myself even believe Khane is right. I just lough at the blind Arab hate that even this series exposes. How in their eyes you can't be a decent person without advocating to throw jews to the sea. How jews legaly coming and buying and developing land that even they enjoy cause of the increase of uppertonity is somehow evil. I love this series cause it shows how even during the rule of the ottoman empire you didn't have peace How Arabs fought among themselves.

His talk of building an ethnic homeland and creating living room by clearing out the natives sounds more like mustache man though.

@@barahngwow, that’s a real 💩ty take.

History books. Not wiki

Yes and no muslim can live with jews without a problem

You're mixing Zionism with Judaism here. A very idiotic remark.

My attempt at saying Ikhwan

@@JabzyJoe thanks for responding bro!

It is reasonable to understand National Socialism as the very unique and organic movement it was. But it's unfair to completely disconnect it with Fascism, which is its core political philosophy. During the 1920s and 1930s, the main thing that divided Fascist movements (including National Socialism) were more so national interests than anything, of course there were rather minut ideological divisions, which were also influenced by national interests. The reality is that you won't really find any philosophical differences between Fascism and National Socialism when you realize that Fascism is not an ideology, but a political philosophy that movements connect to. Most people attempt to divide National Socialism and Fascism by utilizing Italian Fascism as the differentiating factor, but that falls flat since Italian Fascism is the Italian realization of Fascism, rather than the all-sayer of Fascism itself - and obviously, Mussolini is no Marx of Fascism; Fascism has no Marx. That being said, all European Fascist movements (Even Italian Fascism) at the time recognized the reality of race and embraced it. Though, not to the extend the National Socialists did as they were Germanic-centred and believed that the Germanic race should be the leaders of the white race. Speaking as a Fascist myself.

@@Milk-nf9px Well that was a load of garbage. Italian Fascism is the "Realization" of Fascism itself. THEY INVENTED IT. The Nazis didn't call themselves Fascist, evolved independently, and built their system off the Nordic Social Democratic Model, sure they borrowed from the Italian Fascist but so did they also borrow from the Marxist. Hitler himself even stated Fascism may work for Italy but will not work for Germany. When the Germans took control of Northern Italy in 1943 they didn't re-establish the Italian Fascist Party, but created a completely new government under National Socialist beliefs. The Nazis also oppressed and arrested the Fatherland Front leaders, ie the Austrian Fascist Party. The British who adopted Italian Fascism vs those who adopted National Socialist beliefs also clashed with each other in Britain. These are not the same ideologies. Claiming your a Fascist doesn't change that. Definitely being most modern Fascist have been poisoned by post war Nazi and Fascist Larpers who sometimes even belief Marxist propaganda about Fascism. Most famous example of this is National Bolshevism which literally just recreated Nazism, because they assumed Nazism was Capitalist at it's core. So removed the "Capitalist" elements which never existed to begin with. This same confusion is the primary reason the British Union of Fascist and the Imperial Fascist League basically went to war with each other in Britain. British Union of Fascist adopted the Italian system while the Imperial Fascist League Modeled themselves off National Socialism. Both ideologies directly clashed with each other. The only reason the Imperial Fascist League called themselves Fascist was because in Britain everyone called the Nazis Fascist. So similar to the British Fascist (another earlier group) they called themselves Fascist without realizing what Fascism was, btw the British Fascist under Rotha Orman were literally pro capitalist feminist who were anti Marxist, they never bothered to learn what Fascism was but can be best described as Larpers. Which is a common thread. You even see this today with the book Socialism of Duty, where the author literally uses Julius Evola as a bridge to marry Fascist and Nazi beliefs together... basically EXACTLY WHAT THE MARXIST DID... like Umberto Echo, and the author of Socialism of Duty considers himself a Fascist, yet believes Marxist propaganda on Fascism.

He described him as inexperienced in both war and politics and therefore unreliable for making drastic changes he also rejected switching to outright fascism when it was seen as successful in Italy

@@kriemhild9425well it’s pretty clear Hitler knew more than ataturk lol (no offense)

@@kriemhild9425 thanks you seem informed so where could I get information like this please?

@@Ciech_mateBe aware that a lot of lies are created about him by kemalists to suit their narrative.

@@Ramirez83786 thank you mate, I am aware of potential bias. As a historian I can sniff it out, or at least try to.

🤯🤯🤯

@@alter3602 Is that supposed to be Saddam Hussein?

Super inflation

Thank you , truth is they're the most pure Kurds , they speak Kurdish , and have their prayers in kurdish.

funny since Marxists are the ones running the culture and currently running it into the dirt. Of course they are telling you about people dead not for decades but for over a century. Pay more attention to the current people casusing issues in your nation rather than people who have no power in other nations that say words you dislike

You seem like a liberal, might want to do some introspection before calling others shitty people

Britain and the others are placing their own immigration controls in the pre-war years. Germany starts to confiscate property of all Jewish exiles and refusing these now impoverished Jews in the UK etc re-entry. They have some idea that this will spread the "Jew problem". Jews in the UK have to fund refugees themselves.

aran

Yeah ironically he killed muslims than anyone

The awards ironic like the peace prize.

That's a good bunch of lies on Timur,

And like the crusaders wen they soups to protect Christianity but they killed and re..p christians in byzantine empire

@@islammehmeov2334 keep looking Moor

How is that relevant to this video?

​@@christianweibrecht6555every people had their AH supporters

IBM made machines that did the shoah en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust

many major industrial figures supported hitler before ww2 because they were at odds with big finance and people of wall street. By 1945 big finance took over most of america's industries and then gradually over a period of time the rest of the world.

🙄 “what about”

the christians murdered an entire continent

guess who is the biggest murderers of all time , yup , the west , britin , france , and USA .

Yes jews and europeans

@@manofwar2354 I disagree with both: Japanese and Germans

@@randomperson-uj4bp both germans and japanese did was retaliation to invaders Read what in ww1 did to germany and how nasty america was to japan

This is pseude-history to cover up that zionists funded the nazi's. This is zionist propaganda - just like "there is a list ". to make it oke to kill muslims

Comes up when I deal with ww2 itself...

@@JabzyJoe ahh my apologies, didnt see the year range

The story of Christendom was always an empirial religion, born under the auspices of constantine, the subjects were converted at the edge of the sword and rendered into slaves for his majesty, often referring to him as their lord. In Islam such slavery is unthinkable. The only lordship is that of the creator, no station into which man was brought into the lands of Islam was to any degree as bad as the repugnant chattel slavery brought by the primitive tribalism inherent in their texts, for example, the word עוֹלֵל, ʿôlēl which means 'Babe, infant, little one, a suckling' occurs 21 King James Bible Verses Of these verses: “Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.” -Psalm 137:9 “Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.” -1 Samuel 15:3 “Therefore I am full of the fury of the LORD; I am weary with holding in: I will pour it out upon the children abroad, and upon the assembly of young men together: for even the husband with the wife shall be taken, the aged with him that is full of days.” -Jeremiah 6:11 “Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.” -Hosea 13:16 The other verses are not much different. Infact it is always in association with violence. Indeed these verses are the reason why in the Crusades the sense of pious rejoicing at massacre does not appear to be the product of later theologizing; it is also found, in the account of the eye-witness Raymond of Aguilers: “in the Temple and porch of Solomon, men rode in blood up to their knees and bridle reins. Indeed, it was a just and splendid judgment of God that this place should be filled with the blood of the unbelievers, since it had suffered so long from their blasphemies.” In fact, Raymond continues, “This day, I say, will be famous in all future ages, for it turned our labours and sorrows into joy and exultation; this day, I say, marks the justification of all Christianity, the humiliation of paganism, and the renewal of our faith.” Another account by a chronicler and eyewitness-priest, Albert of Aachen, describes the killing of fleeing women, and depicts crusaders as:: “seizing [infants who were still suckling] by the soles of their feet from their mothers’ laps or their cradles…and dashing them against the walls or lintels of the doors and breaking their necks […] they were sparing absolutely no gentile of any age or kind.”The incoherence inherent in a stranger to Abraham calling the children of Abraham gentiles notwithstanding, this account evokes the very same Psalm 137:9 imprecation against Babylon, in Latin, “beatus qui tenebit et adlidet parvulos tuos ad petram.” Albert describes a massacre occurring, in cold blood, on the second day following the conquest, painting a scene that is as horrific as it is realistic and detailed: "Girls, women, matrons, tormented by fear of imminent death and horror-struck by the violent murder wrapped themselves around the Christians’ bodies in the hope to save their lives, even as the Christians were raving and venting their rage in murder of both sexes. Some threw themselves at their feet, begging them with pitiable weeping and wailing for their lives and safety. When children five or three years old saw the cruel fate of their mothers and fathers, of one accord they stepped up the weeping and pitiable clamour. But they were making these signals for pity and mercy in vain. For the Christians gave over their whole hearts to murder, so that not a suckling little male-child or female, not even an infant of one year would escape the hand of the murderer". Evoking several of these verses in practice: - (Num 31:17-18) Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves. - (Deut 7:2, 9:3, Num 21) thou shalt smite them, and utterly destroy them; thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor shew mercy unto them... - (Deut 20:16-17) thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth - (1 Sam 27:9,11) And David smote the land and left neither man nor woman alive ... - (Ezek 9:6) Slay utterly old [and] young both maids and little children and women: but come not near any man upon whom [is] mark begin at my sanctuary. This is the polar opposite of how the crusaders were treated in return; Eyewitness-chronicler of the fifth crusade, Oliver of Paderborn writes on how the starving defeated crusaders were treated after their defeat: "Who could doubt that such goodness, friendship and charity come from God? Men whose parents, sons and daughters, brothers and sisters, had died in agony at our hands, whose lands we took, whom we drove naked from their homes, revived us with their own food when we were dying of hunger and showered us with kindness even when we were in their power." This is the polar opposite in the Quran in Surah Al-Tanwir, literally "The Englightenining" Surah, Aya 8-9, we have the death of a newborn is mentioned amongst the penultimate signs of the end of times, emphasizing the gravity of such an action. That child, now resurrected, is asked for what wrong doing was she murdered. This is to emphasize that she had done nothing wrong, for she had done nothing wrong and this is the day of retribution where those who omitted the evil are to be punished. This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190, which exhorts to fight unbelievers and not be "Aggressors", in the commentary of what it means to be aggressors, this was stated Al-Hasan Al-Basri stated that transgression (indicated by the Ayah): "includes mutilating the dead, theft (from the captured goods), killing women, children and old people who do not participate in warfare, killing priests and residents of houses of worship, burning down trees and killing animals without real benefit." This is also the opinion of Ibn `Abbas, `Umar bin `Abdul-`Aziz, Muqatil bin Hayyan and others. Muslim recorded in his Sahih that Buraydah narrated that Allah's Messenger said: "Fight for the sake of Allah and fight those who disbelieve in Allah. Fight, but do not steal, commit treachery, mutilate, or kill a child, or those who reside in houses of worship." It is reported in the Two Sahihs that Ibn `Umar said, "The Prophet forbade killing women and children." بابتداء القتال أو بقتال من نهيتم عن قتاله من النساء والشيوخ والصبيان والذين بينكم وبينهم عهد أو بالمثلة أو بالمفاجأة من غير دعوة "To kill those whom you were forbidden to from women, elderly, children and those whom betwixt you is a treaty or custom or by surprise or without cause" -Tafsir Al-Zamakshari of the meaning of Aggressors in the Aya More hadith from Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah: حَدَّثَنَا حُمَيْدُ بْنُ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ شَيْخٍ، مِنْ أَهْلِ الْمَدِينَةِ مَوْلَى لِبَنِي عَبْدِ الْأَشْهَلِ، عَنْ دَاوُدَ، عَنْ عِكْرِمَةَ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ كَانَ إِذَا بَعَثَ جُيُوشَهُ قَالَ: «§لَا تَقْتُلُوا أَصْحَابَ الصَّوَامِعِ» "Do not kill the dwellers of monasteries" حَدَّثَنَا ابْنُ فُضَيْلٍ، عَنْ جُوَيْبِرٍ، عَنِ الضَّحَّاكِ قَالَ: كَانَ «§يُنْهَى عَنْ قَتْلِ الْمَرْأَةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ» سَعْدٍ قَالَ: «§نَهَى رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ عَنْ قَتْلِ النِّسَاءِ وَالذُّرِّيَّةِ، وَالشَّيْخِ الْكَبِيرِ الَّذِي لَا حَرَاكَ بِهِ» "The prophet forbids the killing of women, children, and the elderly" This is the polar opposite in the Qur'an, Surah Al-Anfal Ayah 61 in which even oath breaking deniers/unbelievers are allowed to sue for peace states if the unbelievers they ask for peace, give it to them. The modifiable testament testament commands indiscriminate killing, genocide, plunder, mutilation, enslavement, or torture of enemies, including women, on the other hand.Surah Al-Baqara Aya 190 limits war to those who fight against Muslims, prohibits transgression, and implies respect for human dignity and life Indeed it is what precedes the famous "sword verse", always cited out of context. Surah Al-Nisaa Aya 46 - Addresses people who take Ayat from the Quran out of their context God did bring down the Qur’an, Mohamed is his Messenger.

.... So your definition of right wing = what exactly?

Were the crusaders right wing or left wing or is it a habit of jabzy to make anachronistic statements without substance? Save us the juvenile value judgements and stick to a timleline fact sheet from now on.

Were the crusaders rightwing or leftwing? Or is it a habit of jabzy to make anachronistic substance without substance? Save us the juvenile value statements and stick to an animated timeline of events.

Everyone is left wing compared to Nazis

Your forgetting that we muslims who fought in any side of ww2 were just used as canon fodder, wether it was for the western allies, axis or soviets

The title is a question. As all things, there is nuance, which is touched upon in the video. The answer to that question should be reached by the viewer with the information provided. He never claims that Muslims as a group supported Nazis, and provides instances where there was a conflict of interest. The reason there is no "did Christians support the Nazis" video is because nobody's actually thinking about that, meanwhile the question of Muslim loyalties is much more obscure. And why would he need to clarify about it being Middle Eastern Muslims? The video is part of a series ON the Middle East. The fact it's about Middle Eastern Muslims should be obvious, even with the title.

@@FF-le3ps Only true muslims did not fight in the war but those who did are not real muslims

@@NoUsername534 tbh the vast majority of Muslims who fought in ww2 had little to know choice, either forced through gunpoint or starvation

South asian muslims did ut cause they were forced too