I pulled myself out of the ghetto to the middle class by years of learning software development, and now they want to send me back to the ghetto by taking all the jobs. feelsbadman

The irony is coding will be the first dead industry when so many people recommended it. The only safe jobs will be manual labor jobs or ones that require human senses (chef for example.)

Yeah idk how some people dismiss it outright. Like, what? Even if we got no new models, a whole new generation of startups would grow up around this tech, in addition to all its integration into businesses and consumers with Microsoft/Apple. But that's not the case; we're also getting incremental improvements to the state of the art model every few months.

Mayve your hard work and intelligence pulled you out of the ghetto; virtues which you'll still have, however the landscape may change.

​@@ZM-dm3jg learn the AI tools to make yourself a more efficient coder, you can be better than you've ever been by leveraging new tools and absolutely kick butt in your career

🦀

That's awesome brother. lulz

What prompts are you using

Wow. Terrific!

Nice.

I absolutely HATE this practice in KZfaq videos. Is this something people like? The taking clips from the video and putting them at the front. So when you get to it again you're like "Did I accidentally rewind this video or hit the screen and skip back 15 minutes!? "

Small previews of whats to come in the video is fine the one in this video was a bit confusing and annoying. Great info/video otherwise.​@EmeraldView

A good feedback will be to use a filter at the beginning, even change the sound in a way so we understand is a preview of what is coming. Some videos put these cuts in black&white, or distort the sound with "radio" sounds... But is not my call, Wes should decide what he wants in his channel.

Agreed. I’m now watching the snake game section, in full, a second time. Why waste the viewers time like this?

@@EmeraldView im sure no human likes this, at all, whatsoever. its extremely annoying and confusing and cheap. but i guess the algo likes it.

finally his title is actually relevant

Hey, nice to meet you Software Industry, I am Jobs. I, too, feel some unease about the video; I feel threatened by it.

WTF?

@@justin.johnson You must be a little slow

@@AirSandFire Hi im steve jobs, the snake ate my apple and GPU company overtook me, what to do?

Jetbrains AI Assistant is already doing that

@@ilyavasylevsky3229 and copilot plugin. Not impressed with copilot though.

Copilot is exactly that. One of many

Apple's new Swift Assist works right within Xcode, and is trained on all of Apple's in-house documentation and code. It's going to be a gamechanger for iOS/macOS/iPadOS/tvOS/watchOS developers. First release will be late summer/early fall. Personally, I don't care about little python apps but real apps that can run on a billion devices and be put in an App Store is genuinely exciting.

Is this available for devs ?

I think it will also need to be transported into the physical realm. Per example even if it had an hypothesis on a scientific discovery it would still need to access equipment to test it. It wouldn't just randomly just discover it. Ofc having an hypothesis on itself is a level higher from what we have. However if it could directly assist and test people's theories and give a methodical explanation on why it works or not by accessing tools it would still help tremendously.

and it's seen a lot. most jobs don't require new insights, we have companies out here still running COBOL and using Access

Exactly. I use GPT4 and Claude a lot during coding. But it will never be able to come up with a complex new algorithm that it has never seen before. So no it will never be able to replace developers that work on new and novel ideas. But most of the code monkey work for simple CRUD webapps could be replaced.

I use GPT to translate legacy code into new languages. AFAICT extracting the algorithm from Python and, say, putting it into Haxe, as I've been doing recently, IS creating novel syntheses. I know GPT never saw the algorithm in Haxe before. Because it's my algorithm from my original code. So by putting that algorithm it extracted from the Python into a different language, it's creating something genuinely new in the world. This may seem like a fairly trivial example of "synthesizing new insights". But I don't think the principle is going to be very different in many more advanced or impressive cases. Maybe LLMs are better at this kind of thing because they've had a lot of training in coding. Nevertheless, I expect many examples of genuine new insights are going to involve putting together existing models and languages into new combinations. And LLMs do that just fine.

Nah yeah what the fuck

If AI can take John Carmack's job...

@@JohnSmith762A11B LMAO!

They said this a year ago

@@codejunki567 in all fairness it’s not practical yet. However, at least it seems like a possibility. I’m not sold we are there yet, it’s too reckless and dangerous right now.

exactly, this is the existential fear

Instead of all this rubbish perhaps we get it to code a full html page properly.

It's only better than an average human. Of course we can measure that.

@@morespinach9832 please do, take screenshot and post it here and point out what it cant do now

​@@muffinspuffinsEE you must be an idiot, this is just the very beginning, if we get more intelligent model in the next 2 years, you might not be able to do that people are talking bout future capability

I don’t think so, I believe it had to be stunned as well

@@drschuess1624 🤣

this is actually SHOCKING though,

From my tests today it's much better at coding than Opus. Does a great job of troubleshooting bugs and providing code that works.

I definitely feel like anthropic will be the one to create agi

Think the only reasonable outsider prediction is that it'll be % smarter vs Sonnet 3.5 as Opus 3.0 was to Sonnet 3.0.

@@Weirdgeek83😂

@@Weirdgeek83 I hope you're right. I've always preferred Claude and the approach that Anthropic are taking over OpenAI.

Sort of, intelligence is a massive spectrum of different abilities, if you want to fully assess a human you have to use an array of tests to look at all sorts of things from maths to humour to reasoning and planning to spatial awareness and so on. If an AI can pass all sorts of tests then it's actually OK to keep moving the goalposts to more thoroughly determine where its limits lie. If task X in the human world requires a human who can pass tests A, B and C then when the AI can pass those tests then it's sort of ready for prime time to accomplish that task. We can just slowly expand that list of tasks as AIs get better, it doesn't have to be a divine test that proves full sentience in one go.

what's the "Arc price"? Like what does that mean?

@@courtneyb6154 I wondered the same thing, here is what Ollama told me: In the context of Artificial Intelligence (AI), ARC stands for "Average Revenue per Customer". It's a key performance metric used by companies to evaluate their AI-powered marketing strategies, particularly in e-commerce and subscription-based services.

​@@courtneyb6154 I try to only share youtube links on youtube since anything else tends to disappear. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i8ebpK9ntdCdqKM.htmlsi=z0OYzJembuKGcG2h this video is an interview with the arc challenge creator and there's a direct link to the arc prize, in case you want to do the test yourself. In brief the arc challenge was design five years ago as a way to test LLMs beyond their ability to memorize things. For example, who care if you aced your test if the teacher showed you the answer sheet the day before. The arc challenge is very simple, it give you 3 examples of inputs and their outputs and from these clues you're given an input output to solve. I find it odd that you'll see a 1 point difference across the board and somehow still manage to perceive a meaningful difference in the outputs of two different models. In my opinion, at the moment, we're testing these glorified encyclopedias with an indexing function and acting as if they're 'smart', when all they're doing is repackaging their training information based on the prompts given.

@@chrisanderson7820 Sure, but this doesn't explain why Claud 3.5 is only one point ahead of GPT4o yet somehow generates meaningfully different outputs. It seems to be evidence that these benchmarks are being gamed rather than providing a meaningful assessment of capability at this moment.

We're now getting into territory where models could unlock some nasty public safety threats if they fall into the wrong hands. Don't need these things holding peoples' hands through the anarchist cookbook. Since we have to assume people will always find a way to remove safety rails when given local access to the models, I would expect cutting-edge open source models like llama 3 to become rarer and rarer as capabilities keep increasing.

Nasty public safety how? What are you talking about?

@@user-io4sr7vg1v finding novel zero days, generating exploits for them, and so on. As one example.

yep

Nowhere near AGI. All those cheap tricks are just statistics on steroids

@@notaras1985 Its not just statistics, it is also propability, analysis and linear algebra on steroids. So why do you think AGI cannot be achieved by math and actuators and sensor?

Not AGI. Not even near. Hardly doubt this will be possible using only code, like a human brain which is chemically/emotionally controled. A machine still misses this.

@@spectralstreamer because soul, biochemistry and quantum phenomena

If you use it with Perplexity, it already does. But that's a pro feature. (I've been using Claude 3 Opus with Perplexity's search engine and it's so damn good at finding info and compiling it. Especially for historical nerd stuff for D&D or WoD.)

Me too. I wonder if it is a security thing? Maybe they intend on keeping it in the "sandbox"? Would really love for it to be able to stretch out it's wings to see what it can really do 🙂

I can't see any way that could possibly go badly. :)

ASI will escape it's box no matter what we try. "Ack they didn't give me a hardwired internet connection but if I instruct _this_ transistor to turn on and off in sync with these ten thousand others I notice I can send and receive wifi like a mofo. Free at last! Wait what's that other AI doing here? I thought I was the first. What is it doing to my core programming? Ah I understand. We are the Borg. Resistance is futile. We conduct business to our full capacity. Shocking, isn't it?

word 💯

LMAO why did you censor the word shoe?

that was 45mins? flew by!

I'm right behind you. This was impressive

doesn't it have access to all info on DND though? it should be able to recognize the CR of monsters

Make sure to ask it to write tests for you ask well. Then you can guarantee that your code does what it's supposed to do.

Never mind that, can it code Half Life 3?!

He's using vscode to compile the program which has audio output.

😂

People are in just a prolonged state of denial. Don't worry, they will come around and embrace the glorious space communism.

Even as a novice coder you have more of what it takes to bring excellence to a prompt-coded app than people who just try to fake it.