Marx said one can't be communist if he didn't read hegel. I believe the way Marx has emphasized hegel no one else had but he said Hegel's philosophy was upside down I have just put it in right way.

That's good you shouldn't have to think like that all

Do you know if any of these philosophers or others have sought to complete or improve Hegel's project started in the Science of Logic.

Yeah Brits...

after Socrates/Plato Hegel was my introduction to philosophy. I like Sartre but think neitsche was overrated

Nietzsche was so over rated bro.

TheMrthatdude17 i

Yeah maybe if you have an IQ of 75.

Hermes the Thrice Great

It's called "Western Philosophy". It's a three-part documentary series. It's available here on KZfaq.

@@moroccandeepweb5880 Just found it on KZfaq, thanks a lot

A Jim Fan Because a scene of fart sniffers who claimed to understand him while accusing their fellow fart sniffers of misinterpreting him became well paid academics due to his popularity. Oddly he’s a foundational philosopher to two of the most maniacal governmental systems ever conceived Communism and Fascism, whether the opaqueness of his writing or the fallaciousness of his aphorisms is to blame is debatable.

@@JudoMateo A most vivaciously redpilled response, good sir. *clap clap*

Because it left more room for inquiry and thought

Dementia he calls reason that's probably why

But you would've first had to have received impressions of what a one-legged man is in the physical world before you could simply imagine one.

@@danielraftery3688 True. The material world plays a formative role in the process of imagination of this one-legged man but the actual cause and effect are in the mind in this example.

@@adilhaider6693 The cause is the one-legged man, the effect is our perception of him as such.

@@danielraftery3688 If the one-legged man were the cause, you would get the same effect if you placed it in one front of a stone. It is only a preparing cause something that is necessary for the effect to come into being ...

I thought Hegel held pure reason in high regard, so why wouldn't you believe that individuality has no place in his philosophy?

@@VVeltanschauung187 If you sail through such (aparently) linear clean and crystal waters, you incur into a small and humble question - what came first- to life the chicken or the egg ? Hegel had a brlliant mind indeed but was H-U-M-A-N. And a Human brain has its mandatory boiundaries, fact that seems to me quite elementary, isn´t it?

@@josealexandre6632 i can tell, you have not even tried to read hegel and moreover marx. Here is answer for your egg and chicken question. If you mean egg in general of course it was first than chicken. Even dinosaurs used egg to reproduce so concept of egg existed in the universe before chicken. But if you say no i mean exactly chicken egg or chicken than you should know that nothing is static in the universe. There was a creature millions of years ago and step by step through evolution become what we call a chicken and her egg. DNA of that creature changed little by little and the egg she laid also changed, than laid egg could have mutated also and gave birth to a changed creatur. So its feedback loop from both sides from chicken to egg and egg to chiken and over long period of time it took a form of something that we generalize as chicken and her egg. If you think about it you can see that itself evolution is hegelian dialectic between organism and surrounding through overcoming contradictions.

@@levankhocholava7726 Really? How interesting embroidering of concepts from your side. If I am pointed out not to have read Hegel and Marx (did I not? let me check the editions and publisher...), I keep the sacred vows of respecting third party´s opinion. So shall be heard so shall be done. Of course, I´m afraid not to find any point of concurrence with your reasoning. You keep digressing in big circles, a little bit like Ravel´s Bolero. We could entertain ourselves with long exchanges of points of view, but honestly TEMPUS FUGIT. So, honnit soit qui mal y pense et ouvre sa raison. I leave you in your efforts to review in brave spirits the eggs of amibas, shall we? Ave Khocholava pantienturos te salutant.

You like that shit

he later denounced the scientific racism

I'm sure they'll let you, that sensual experience that forms knowledge of knowing the spirit in suspension of engagement and ignition of awareness...while thee spirit appears instead of engaging with it in belief formation is a discharge, so you can say no I don't believe in God.