Bangladesh

Bangladesh

Yes but little less of the tree hugger BS. The first sign of this mass extinction started when all the mega fauna started to die off. Yes , we need to keep our planet clean. But this isn't all us.

@@rexmann1984 it's mostly China

yes please 😅

I know! These videos are awesome!

Yes precisely. Just subbed.

I agree

@@harrietharlow9929 pop 0ú

💯

Correct I was just about to point this out when I seen your comment. For the channel to say that there is no conclusive evidence for this is a a big blunder to make.

How strange is it to think that us and 90% of all creatures most likely will die within the next hundred thousand years or so, and all of human life and history will be forgotten...then in hundreds of millions of years time, perhaps a new intelligent being will take over.

Life finds always a way! I would not wonder if there is life on Venus, Mars and many moons. I guess the starting condition is essential, but when life covered all kinds of areas, it will stay, just in a different form. Mass extinctions only happen when something happens thats going on too fst to addapt or its too extreme. One problem is, life needs a certain temperature to be vital enough to change over time. All other things are a gamble. Does it change good enough to survive or not? On Mars there is maybe something left underground, but this will be not big or very vital. On Venus there is only a chance for up high in the atmosphere, on the ground or benathe it its way to hot for any life. I know extremophiles that life at black smokers, but they dont live inside them, just close to them. I think the range is much wider than we can imagine, but there are limits. Except there is no carbon based life, but thats something we didnt find yet.

We only understand life on our planet. I'm positive there's life out there that's simply beyond our understanding.

It's not that the astrobiologists don't know about extremophiles. It's that they want to first look in the most likely places for life to exist as that's the most likely place to find them.

@@tahustvedt I don't know, if you look at the history of the earth, lifeforms lived for hundreds of millions of years in conditions we would classify as extreme now. In comparison the conditions now have only been around for the blink of an eye. Wouldn't it make more sense to look for life in places with conditions that have been known to support life the longest?

I live in Karachi Pakistan and I like your comment thanks

TBH, the reasons for this and the event itself is what I find most frightening. We will not survive an ecological collapse, and it's coming. I suspect it will behave like a phase change or a critical point. Things will be fine and then they won't. It will happen fast.

I call unknown good Cryptos Hidden gems 🧐

Omg ur hot

There's really not.

Yep. Nature

South Park actually confirmed it's just a reality show for aliens.

Gods joke on life.

Half the population of the US struggles with facts.

Rite straight from the organisms mouth , no he say she say.. 😆😆😆

No, not necessarily. Those organisms were single celled, basically the foundation of life that would have evolved from them later on. Their make ups were very basic, and were the creations of basic chemistry.

For sure , you can’t make something out of nothing 🌈💐🤗

I feel really bad for you

Hail helium.

I feel the same way about you dude, then, why can't sciences still can't explain the Soul? This is just one example. Even if all the scientific community gathered around this matter they will give no explanation for it. You can start trying

@Younes Lahouili i don’t think we human have soul it is just what religious writer say so they can invent heaven and hell.Sorry if i reply to your comment i know that comment of yours is for younes.

@@juliocasim4330 but what's the purpose of this life if there was no heaven and hellfire. We are here to be tested. And of course there will be a judgment. But we still have a Soul, and it's said in religious scripture that no one will be able to define what it is. Anyway, if science does not prove the existence of God then the science is wrong

Hey bro, it's called "Who will save us now?" By David Chappell. Enjoy 🙌

@@uprisinggbr4108 thank you so much!! ❤️

Check out the Suspicious 0bservers KZfaq channel, in particular his play lists on this very subject (the Galactic current sheet)

@@stevefox8605 Suspicious Observers is a scientist who does science and then denies climate science with it. He mainly focuses of climate change denial without ever really saying so but he also may have some research on magnetism and electricity which have some value pursuing if only he wasn't trying to rewrite all other understood science with it. Still kinda worth watching for possible explanations of past extinctions which currently have no other reasons. But if you watch enough you will start to see that under his work is a climate denier disguised as a new theory of everything scientist which most main stream scientist realize.

@@remicaron3191 he doesn't disguise it, it's one of the main premises of the channel (to get the facts out there). Been watching Ben every day since 2013 - I don't agree with everything he says, but there's much information that's very useful, ranging from the blummin obvious once pointed out (no dark matter, it's electromagnetic) to the more eclectic (space weather interaction with the earth and our bodies etc) His broadcasts are the tip of the iceberg, he always provides links to his source material which is worthwhile reading too. Thanks for your comment 👍🏻

@@remicaron3191 "denies climate science".. no he shows you what is real climate science compared to the climate hysteria propaganda in mainstream news also known as the "man made climate change", he undeniably proofs that climate has always changed due to changes in activity of the sun, periodic orbital changes of earth and galactic current sheet. You are one of those people who are easy to brainwash to believe anything, like that cow farts are going to warm our climate. If you had studied anything at all you would know that the "climate science" isn't even science at all since they have on purpose ignored chunks of data that doesn't fit in their narrative.

@@larrymcfagerstrom9172 and my point is proven. A pseudoscientist with his true goal of confusing the less informed and easily distracted.

Excellent point!

And radioactivity too.

Nope

Like a large family gathering at Thanksgiving ... should have had a bowl game on TV.

Lets just make it through the next 500 yrs.