Been waiting for the follow up for a long time lol

Pretty sure there are a few examples out there...

There are plenty of movies that actually had no script writer and some have even been masterpieces

Then there's no movie.

You get Ghostbusters(2016)

Bollywood movies in a nutshell

billygowhoop true! But a lot of that can he done on a budget, it’s just less convenient. There’s some stuff that costs a lot because of its physical properties (lenses, accurate lights) but things like jibs and dollies can be definitely be DIY. The director of Lights Out and Shazam has a great channel on here where he teaches that stuff, I highly recommend it.

@@DodaGarcia And the critical piece of information missing is that his channel is called "Ponysmasher."

😂😂

Yes. And not the ones with "cinematic colour filters" or technical mumbo jumbo.

​@@ganeshsonawanemail I love slowmo as much as the next guy, but you very rarely see slowmo sequences in real cinema, so it's funny how cinematic became associated with that.

@@NewLayer I know who you're talking about.

@@ufukkiblat Haha, I wasn't referring to anyone specific, because I think it's about 90% of people at this point :)

cinematography relies more on the lighting.

Should have been "but me ma ain't around no more, is she?" and how 3+ people let that incorrect phrasing go through is beyond me.

FlameMage2 this guy[character] doesn’t seem like he had the best schooling nor cares to much about using proper grammar while speaking...

FlameMage2 that’s the point

They snap the time stone

In every pause that happens, the actors are just staying still

ROFL

It could be in post just to make sure that the acting and the lighting is the same and the only difference is the camera shake, which actually is pretty smart and gives a good A/B comparison

I was thinking the same about the whip pan

Ikr

@@hypercept Cloverfield was great but I get your point.

haha! i was looking for this comment :D

That’s what I thought

Boy that ain't symmetrical at all look at the angle of the shelf

@@johnnycampos1760 he's saying Wes Anderson does a lot of whip pan

Best part of the whole video :P

So you think a director is going to allow some camera operator just to do whatever he likes. Understand that so called bad director has no idea he is bad (more likely he thinks he's great) therefore he is not going to give up the control, so as for bad writing but usually that does not get to the set unless it is the director producer or other money person doing the writing. Your proffer supposes the bad director or writer realizes it has an epiphany and lays down on the floor prostrate in contrition. You will never ever see that.

I love how you said "this kinda type of"

*InVeST*

+1

Same here

Realizing the nail filer is conducive to the plot of this short, I would keep the shot on the filer as the hitman moved toward the lawyer. I would've just incorporated a simple pan shot.

that's what I thought

but the lawyer guy seemed to deliver the line in a more menacing tone in the first take, then switch it to a more meek-jokey delivery in the second.

Thank you! This video was some of the most misinformed "education" I've seen. These were all director choices. The real problems with not having a camera operator would be lack of focus if there is no First AC and less precise camera move. That's it.

It was shot on a sony FS7 with Canon EF CN-E lenses

Drinker_Of_ Milk exactly. My point exactly. I was indeed a waste of time.