I like the intro

There are answers but this program would end if any of them were clearly articulated. We would all go home and stop watching. No more revenue.

balance…

nothing wrong with being grateful for the AND the unknown

a great imagination

@@dforbes8783 But true 👍

Listen to me my friend yes I truly existe, I am in Quebec city Canada. Listen you the first that know now. I just meat my HOLY ARMY FEW MINUTES AGO. IT WAS FULL HIDING IN THE CLOUD THAT THEY MAKE THAT CLOUD HUGE AS THE HOLE QUÉBEC AREA NOT MOUVING FOR ABOUT 4 HOURS. IT WAS SO LONG TO ME AND THEM SINCE LAST TIME WE WERE ALL TOGETHER, THEY ARE HERE NOW DON'T KEEP THE SECRET MY FREIND. I WISH CLOSER TO TRUE CAME HERE BUT EVERY TIME I SAY THAT NO ONE ANSWERED ME. IF THEY COME I WILL BE ON CAMERA NO PROBLEM. OK LOVE YOU

Total woo woo

Vedanta is not Mumbo jumbo. Read and understand the original source material in Sanskrit to understand dharma.

Various subjects under my purview are coalescing. For some time I have been interested in the String Theory of physics. Analytic Theology is a newly discovered subject. Transcendence paradox, if studied under the auspices of Analytic Theology would be very fascinating to me. You, Mr 3D Walthrough inserted an interesting parallel from the Vedic Literature. I would be very interested in the study of Vedic concepts, if I could find someone doing Vedic studies in the format of "Analytic Theology" If anyone can provide more information regarding my quest, I would be very grateful.

@@NickManeck send an email to my Id and I’ll send you an analytic theology paper in the works that explains dharma via a vis religion.

@@rickwyant That would be taken as a complement in some circles, and in the sense that there are greater truths then we can even imagine considering the scope of time in the universe. Science could be considered much more we were in the negative way and that theories are popping up and being this approved or not approved yet science is asking for unconditional faith in the rational of what can be presented objectively, when each result understood differently in terms of subjectively, there is a paradox for you. Science bags for blind faith in its rationality with hopeful promises that are no more valuable than a post-dated check. Science claimed a so-called great victory by the moon landing in 1969 but in the last 53 years I haven’t seen wars or poverty eliminated an earth and actually things may be at an all time low at the moment. What have you been up to lately Science aside from juicing up a virus that was non-transmittable to humans and making it very transmittable, so that it could kill millions? Good job!

You are right about “not meant to know”, but at the same time something is rooting for us to know. Our evolution has been moving towards that climax.

Such is the nature of mental frameworks. Their application comes back to intent. Philosophy without purpose falls into this trap.

@@FalseCogs I agree. So many of today's cultural issues are all only about the definition of words. No my definition of marriage, God, Woman...It's so tired and silly

I don't either, and I'm a Christian who bases my own arguments on science and logic.

Why is falsifiability crucial? My ur-question is "does God exist or not?" and although no possible answer can be falsified, it is really the overarching/crucial of all questions.

you don't need falsifiability. you just need to ask for falsifiability

@@matterasmachine He's asking about "falsifiability."

@@20july1944 fixed. My version of god is falsifiable, but that’s not really what anybody needs;)

@@matterasmachine I don't know what Alex is talking about.

Whatever you say buddy

How can there be more than one Christian doctrine? Multiple interpretations perhaps, all but one of which (& perhaps all of which) must be wrong.

@@amateurprojects3341 there are multiple Christian Bible flr example

The scriptures are derivative of Theology; that being nature(physics), cosmology, astrology, science, etc. This is where the Word come from, rather how we conceieved of it; it is the Word, the Logos, christ, the demiurge. Where the religious go wrong is trying to grasp the scriptures point of view by itself which is extremely difficult, so trying to understand God. Instead, a Spiritual man should go into the wilderness, renouncing the worldly ways, even his own ego and understanding, becoming pure in mind for clarity, and when engaged into nature within himself and the stars, having Known thyself, the meaning therein scriptures will be revealed. Because the Bible is Theology, analytic Theology would be in depth study of nature(physics), metaphysics, science, cosmology, astrology, spirituality, psychology. It's great your copy pasting scriptures. The Trinity is theee persons in One. Father: dielectric Mother(holy spirit): magnetism Christ: electric -- hybrid of father and mother The triune. God is ONE, three persons. And then there's emanation, or the gods. Only those who acknowledge the gods will ever come to see God. Like a painting on the wall, he who observes the art work comes to know of the artificer Intuitively, as God is inconceivable; whereas Christians want to know the artificer by ignoring the art work, thus they never truly see, bevause they haven't grasped intuitively where God is found. Much of the scriptures seem contradictory, and when you see intuitively there are no contradictions. The misconceptions is due to looking at it materialistically or logically.

@@S3RAVA3LM "Seem contradictory" and actually being contradictory are two different things, but I guarantee that you could not prove a single contradiction. As to the Scriptures supposedly needing to be understood in the context of outside sources, the Bible says: "Go in through the narrow gate, because broad is the gate and spacious is the road leading off into destruction, and many are going in through it; whereas narrow is the gate and cramped the road leading off into life, and few are finding it."--Matthew 7:13, 14. After discussing the Old Testament alone, it says, "For the word of God is alive and exerts power and is sharper than any two-edged sword and pierces even to the dividing of soul and spirit, and of joints from the marrow, and is able to discern thoughts and intentions of the heart."--Heb 4:12. After discussing the Hebrew Scriptures alone, it says, "All Scripture is inspired of God and beneficial for teaching, for reproving, for setting things straight, for disciplining in righteousness, so that the man of God may be fully competent, completely equipped for every good work." (2 Timothy 3:16, 17) Thus there is no room for outside help in understanding the Bible. You are recycling claims made in the movie Zeitgeist that have long since been debunked, which can be easily found with a little research on any of your claims. You will not find truth by chasing every fairytale. The Bible says, "we should no longer be children, tossed about as by waves and carried here and there by every wind of teaching by means of the trickery of men, by means of cunning in deceptive schemes. But speaking the truth, let us by love grow up in all things into him who is the head, Christ."--Ephesians 4:14, 15. What is the truth the Bible says to speak? Jesus said, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."--John 14:6. "No, it was not by following artfully contrived false stories that we made known to you the power and presence of our Lord Jesus Christ, but rather, we were eyewitnesses of his magnificence. For he received from God the Father honor and glory when words such as these were conveyed to him by the magnificent glory: 'This is my Son, my beloved, whom I myself have approved.' Yes, these words we heard coming from heaven while we were with him in the holy mountain. "So we have the prophetic word made more sure, and you are doing well in paying attention to it as to a lamp shining in a dark place (until day dawns and a daystar rises) in your hearts. For you know this first, that no prophecy of Scripture springs from any private interpretation. For prophecy was at no time brought by man’s will, but men spoke from God as they were moved by holy spirit."--2 Peter 1:16-21. Anything you say that contradicts these things is only going to be double-speak and sidestep the facts presented here. You have been poisoned by lies seeking to stop your thinking, and you will only keep speaking lies every time you repeat that stuff. If you are only interested in truth, then I suggest you accept a personal Bible study from Jehovah's Witnesses rather than repeat whatever you are told by people who do not want to know the truth and are happy with having their ears tickled by false stories.

@@Dismythed you are blasphemous for thinking all that is literal. Paul says: Do not be a minister of the LETTER. Christ: I speak in parables This refutes every literal position you take, and you dont even know what you're talking about. I never watched zeitgeist.

@@Dismythed jehovah's witnesses? I'm S3RAVA3LM -- tell your cult this. You're clearly sick. When you find the courage within to sacrifice your ego, I can help.

You've got your categories messed up.

But ideas help us to escape those dreaded existential fears. The other option -- embracing oneness -- is even scarier, as it could mean dying even sooner.

You might say the more unsolvable a problem is, the longer people will dwell on it. If a belief system is too consistent or too easy to understand, people may get over it too quickly. This is analogous to a doctor curing an illness too fast. There is a conflict of interest in efficient teachings or prescriptions.

Christianity is the root, from which all others derive. That includes the ancient religions-hinduism & zoroastrianism etc, which do not predate Christianity (remember, Christians believe Jesus was present at Creation) Unlike other religions' Christian precepts at least have their basis in accurate cosmology, science, medicine, history, archeology etc. Not bad for texts compiled thousands of years ago.

The earliest Buddhist sources were replete with gods. It's more of a later development that they became obsolete. There is this false western idea of some sort of pure buddhism that's over-assumed. I can show you two sources that make this clear, if you like.

@@tychocollapse Hm. I see no references to any common concept of God in the Atthakavagga, believed by many to be the earliest writing in the Pali Canon.

@@bobs4429 by "common concept" you must mean a singular creator god. That's a western bias. Mara is in the Pali Canon, among many others.

@@tychocollapse Let's not argue about something so trivial, irrelevant and tangential. Getting back to my point (which I think you agree with), even Buddhism has sufficient material for an Analytic Theology.

@@bobs4429 probably yes.

The fact that you refer to gawd as a he, him, with a his, like it has a penis and testicles; instead as an unknown conceptual divinity, shows how primitive the Abrahamic conception of divinity is. The proof is in your words. Also how simple to think that some words on paper is the same thing as "god said", or "god did". You should be ashamed that you mistake culture for spirituality.

maybe a new title closer to the gaps

The men who wrote the Bible were far more scientific and Wise and Spiritual than any modern scientists today. You have no idea what you're saying. You can think you know what youre saying.

There's nothing primitive about the scripture's. They're the highest level content we have and I bet you cannot decoded even 3 pages. You read it and expect the knowledge to be fed to you by spoon.

The worse part is that he is reaching to religion after exhausting science. He needs to focus more on dharma and it’s epistemology

@@kafiruddinmulhiddeen2386 He is Reaching. I suppose that’s what many of us do but Robert had better come to the realization like I have that I will never know enough to PROVE God or the Multiverse!!

I agree with you. Furthermore, I suspect God prevents us from 'proving' his existence to enable us to believe in him through the mechanism of free will on our part. 'Proof' would invalidate that. That said, I believe there is abundant evidence for his existence.

Kind of like your face?

Mohammad was a pedophile slaver murderer tho, so we can’t really use him as a reliable source of god. Your points about Al lat may be true.